ietf-voucher@2018-04-26.yang		sandy.yang
	skipping to change at line 62		skipping to change at line 62
	This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8366; see the RFC		This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 8366; see the RFC
	itself for full legal notices.";		itself for full legal notices.";
	revision 2018-04-26 {		revision 2018-04-26 {
	description		description
	"Initial version";		"Initial version";
	reference "RFC 8366: Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols";		reference "RFC 8366: Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols";
	}		}
	// Top-level statement		// Top-level statement
	rc:yang-data voucher-artifact {		rc:yang-data "voucher-artifact" {
	uses voucher-artifact-grouping;		uses voucher-artifact-grouping;
	}		}
	// Grouping defined for future augmentations		// Grouping defined for future augmentations
	grouping voucher-artifact-grouping {		grouping voucher-artifact-grouping {
	description		description
	"Grouping to allow reuse/extensions in future work.";		"Grouping to allow reuse/extensions in future work.";
	container voucher {		container voucher {
	description		description
	"A voucher assigns a pledge to an owner (pinned-domain-cert).";		"A voucher assigns a pledge to an owner (pinned-domain-cert).";
	leaf created-on {		leaf created-on {
	type yang:date-and-time;		type yang:date-and-time;
	mandatory true;		mandatory true;
	description		description
	"A value indicating the date this voucher was created. This		"A value indicating the date this voucher was created. This
	node is primarily for human consumption and auditing. Future		node is primarily for human consumption and auditing. Future
	work MAY create verification requirements based on this		work MAY create verification requirements based on this
	node.";		node.";
	skipping to change at line 114		skipping to change at line 114
	integration).";		integration).";
	}		}
	enum logged {		enum logged {
	description		description
	"Indicates that the voucher has been issued after		"Indicates that the voucher has been issued after
	minimal verification of ownership or control. The		minimal verification of ownership or control. The
	issuance has been logged for detection of		issuance has been logged for detection of
	potential security issues (e.g., recipients of		potential security issues (e.g., recipients of
	vouchers might verify for themselves that unexpected		vouchers might verify for themselves that unexpected
	vouchers are not in the log). This is similar to		vouchers are not in the log). This is similar to
	unsecured trust-on-first-use principles but with		unsecured trust-on-first-use principles but with the
	the logging providing a basis for detecting unexpected		logging providing a basis for detecting unexpected
	events.";		events.";
	}		}
	enum proximity {		enum proximity {
	description		description
	"Indicates that the voucher has been issued after		"Indicates that the voucher has been issued after
	the MASA verified a proximity proof provided by the		the MASA verified a proximity proof provided by the
	device and target domain. The issuance has been logged		device and target domain. The issuance has been logged
	for detection of potential security issues. This is		for detection of potential security issues. This is
	stronger than just logging, because it requires some		stronger than just logging, because it requires some
	verification that the pledge and owner are		verification that the pledge and owner are
	in communication but is still dependent on analysis of		in communication but is still dependent on analysis of
	the logs to detect unexpected events.";		the logs to detect unexpected events.";
End of changes. 5 change blocks.
	5 lines changed or deleted		4 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/