| rfc7432v2.txt | rfc7432.txt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| skipping to change at page 2, line 33 | skipping to change at page 2, line 33 | |||
| 2. Specification of Requirements ...................................4 | 2. Specification of Requirements ...................................4 | |||
| 3. Terminology .....................................................4 | 3. Terminology .....................................................4 | |||
| 4. BGP MPLS-Based EVPN Overview ....................................6 | 4. BGP MPLS-Based EVPN Overview ....................................6 | |||
| 5. Ethernet Segment ................................................7 | 5. Ethernet Segment ................................................7 | |||
| 6. Ethernet Tag ID ................................................10 | 6. Ethernet Tag ID ................................................10 | |||
| 6.1. VLAN-Based Service Interface ..............................11 | 6.1. VLAN-Based Service Interface ..............................11 | |||
| 6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface .............................11 | 6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface .............................11 | |||
| 6.2.1. Port-Based Service Interface .......................11 | 6.2.1. Port-Based Service Interface .......................11 | |||
| 6.3. VLAN-Aware Bundle Service Interface .......................11 | 6.3. VLAN-Aware Bundle Service Interface .......................11 | |||
| 6.3.1. Port-Based VLAN-Aware Service Interface ............12 | 6.3.1. Port-Based VLAN-Aware Service Interface ............12 | |||
| 7. BGP EVPN Routes ................................................12 | 7. BGP EVPN Routes ................................................13 | |||
| 7.1. Ethernet Auto-discovery Route .............................13 | 7.1. Ethernet Auto-discovery Route .............................14 | |||
| 7.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route ................................14 | 7.2. MAC/IP Advertisement Route ................................14 | |||
| 7.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route ....................15 | 7.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route ....................15 | |||
| 7.4. Ethernet Segment Route ....................................15 | 7.4. Ethernet Segment Route ....................................16 | |||
| 7.5. ESI Label Extended Community ..............................16 | 7.5. ESI Label Extended Community ..............................16 | |||
| 7.6. ES-Import Route Target ....................................16 | 7.6. ES-Import Route Target ....................................17 | |||
| 7.7. MAC Mobility Extended Community ...........................17 | 7.7. MAC Mobility Extended Community ...........................18 | |||
| 7.8. Default Gateway Extended Community ........................17 | 7.8. Default Gateway Extended Community ........................18 | |||
| 7.9. Route Distinguisher Assignment per EVI ....................18 | 7.9. Route Distinguisher Assignment per EVI ....................18 | |||
| 7.10. Route Targets ............................................18 | 7.10. Route Targets ............................................19 | |||
| 7.10.1. Auto-derivation from the Ethernet Tag ID ..........18 | 7.10.1. Auto-derivation from the Ethernet Tag ID ..........19 | |||
| 8. Multihoming Functions ..........................................18 | 8. Multihoming Functions ..........................................19 | |||
| 8.1. Multihomed Ethernet Segment Auto-discovery ................18 | 8.1. Multihomed Ethernet Segment Auto-discovery ................19 | |||
| 8.1.1. Constructing the Ethernet Segment Route ............19 | 8.1.1. Constructing the Ethernet Segment Route ............19 | |||
| 8.2. Fast Convergence ..........................................19 | 8.2. Fast Convergence ..........................................20 | |||
| 8.2.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per Ethernet | 8.2.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per Ethernet | |||
| Segment Route ......................................20 | Segment Route ......................................21 | |||
| 8.2.1.1. Ethernet A-D Route Targets ................21 | 8.2.1.1. Ethernet A-D Route Targets ................21 | |||
| 8.3. Split Horizon .............................................21 | 8.3. Split Horizon .............................................22 | |||
| 8.3.1. ESI Label Assignment ...............................21 | 8.3.1. ESI Label Assignment ...............................22 | |||
| 8.3.1.1. Ingress Replication .......................22 | 8.3.1.1. Ingress Replication .......................22 | |||
| 8.3.1.2. P2MP MPLS LSPs ............................23 | 8.3.1.2. P2MP MPLS LSPs ............................24 | |||
| 8.4. Aliasing and Backup Path ..................................24 | 8.4. Aliasing and Backup Path ..................................25 | |||
| 8.4.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance Route ..25 | 8.4.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance Route ..26 | |||
| 8.5. Designated Forwarder Election .............................26 | 8.5. Designated Forwarder Election .............................27 | |||
| 8.6. Interoperability with Single-Homing PEs ...................28 | 8.6. Interoperability with Single-Homing PEs ...................29 | |||
| 9. Determining Reachability to Unicast MAC Addresses ..............28 | 9. Determining Reachability to Unicast MAC Addresses ..............30 | |||
| 9.1. Local Learning ............................................28 | 9.1. Local Learning ............................................30 | |||
| 9.2. Remote Learning ...........................................29 | 9.2. Remote Learning ...........................................30 | |||
| 9.2.1. Constructing MAC/IP Address Advertisement ..........29 | 9.2.1. Constructing MAC/IP Address Advertisement ..........31 | |||
| 9.2.2. Route Resolution ...................................31 | 9.2.2. Route Resolution ...................................33 | |||
| 10. ARP and ND ....................................................32 | 10. ARP and ND ....................................................34 | |||
| 10.1. Default Gateway ..........................................33 | 10.1. Default Gateway ..........................................35 | |||
| 11. Handling of Multi-destination Traffic .........................35 | 11. Handling of Multi-destination Traffic .........................36 | |||
| 11.1. Constructing Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route ......35 | 11.1. Constructing Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route ......36 | |||
| 11.2. P-Tunnel Identification ..................................35 | 11.2. P-Tunnel Identification ..................................37 | |||
| 12. Processing of Unknown Unicast Packets .........................36 | 12. Processing of Unknown Unicast Packets .........................38 | |||
| 12.1. Ingress Replication ......................................37 | 12.1. Ingress Replication ......................................39 | |||
| 12.2. P2MP MPLS LSPs ...........................................37 | 12.2. P2MP MPLS LSPs ...........................................39 | |||
| 13. Forwarding Unicast Packets ....................................38 | 13. Forwarding Unicast Packets ....................................39 | |||
| 13.1. Forwarding Packets Received from a CE ....................38 | 13.1. Forwarding Packets Received from a CE ....................40 | |||
| 13.2. Forwarding Packets Received from a Remote PE .............39 | 13.2. Forwarding Packets Received from a Remote PE .............41 | |||
| 13.2.1. Unknown Unicast Forwarding ........................39 | 13.2.1. Unknown Unicast Forwarding ........................41 | |||
| 13.2.2. Known Unicast Forwarding ..........................40 | 13.2.2. Known Unicast Forwarding ..........................41 | |||
| 14. Load Balancing of Unicast Packets .............................40 | 14. Load Balancing of Unicast Packets .............................41 | |||
| 14.1. Load Balancing of Traffic from a PE to Remote CEs ........40 | 14.1. Load Balancing of Traffic from a PE to Remote CEs ........41 | |||
| 14.1.1. Single-Active Redundancy Mode .....................40 | 14.1.1. Single-Active Redundancy Mode .....................42 | |||
| 14.1.2. All-Active Redundancy Mode ........................41 | 14.1.2. All-Active Redundancy Mode ........................42 | |||
| 14.2. Load Balancing of Traffic between a PE and a Local CE ....42 | 14.2. Load Balancing of Traffic between a PE and a Local CE ....44 | |||
| 14.2.1. Data-Plane Learning ...............................43 | 14.2.1. Data-Plane Learning ...............................44 | |||
| 14.2.2. Control-Plane Learning ............................43 | 14.2.2. Control-Plane Learning ............................44 | |||
| 15. MAC Mobility ..................................................43 | 15. MAC Mobility ..................................................45 | |||
| 15.1. MAC Duplication Issue ....................................45 | 15.1. MAC Duplication Issue ....................................47 | |||
| 15.2. Sticky MAC Addresses .....................................45 | 15.2. Sticky MAC Addresses .....................................47 | |||
| 16. Multicast and Broadcast .......................................46 | 16. Multicast and Broadcast .......................................47 | |||
| 16.1. Ingress Replication ......................................46 | 16.1. Ingress Replication ......................................47 | |||
| 16.2. P2MP LSPs ................................................46 | 16.2. P2MP LSPs ................................................48 | |||
| 16.2.1. Inclusive Trees ...................................46 | 16.2.1. Inclusive Trees ...................................48 | |||
| 17. Convergence ...................................................47 | 17. Convergence ...................................................49 | |||
| 17.1. Transit Link and Node Failures between PEs ...............47 | 17.1. Transit Link and Node Failures between PEs ...............49 | |||
| 17.2. PE Failures ..............................................47 | 17.2. PE Failures ..............................................49 | |||
| 17.3. PE-to-CE Network Failures ................................47 | 17.3. PE-to-CE Network Failures ................................49 | |||
| 18. Frame Ordering ................................................48 | 18. Frame Ordering ................................................50 | |||
| 19. Security Considerations .......................................48 | 19. Security Considerations .......................................50 | |||
| 20. IANA Considerations ...........................................50 | 20. IANA Considerations ...........................................52 | |||
| 21. References ....................................................50 | 21. References ....................................................52 | |||
| 21.1. Normative References .....................................50 | 21.1. Normative References .....................................52 | |||
| 21.2. Informative References ...................................51 | 21.2. Informative References ...................................53 | |||
| Acknowledgements ..................................................52 | Acknowledgements ..................................................54 | |||
| Contributors ......................................................53 | Contributors ......................................................55 | |||
| Authors' Addresses ................................................53 | Authors' Addresses ................................................55 | |||
| 1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
| Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS), as defined in [RFC4664], | Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS), as defined in [RFC4664], | |||
| [RFC4761], and [RFC4762], is a proven and widely deployed technology. | [RFC4761], and [RFC4762], is a proven and widely deployed technology. | |||
| However, the existing solution has a number of limitations when it | However, the existing solution has a number of limitations when it | |||
| comes to multihoming and redundancy, multicast optimization, | comes to multihoming and redundancy, multicast optimization, | |||
| provisioning simplicity, flow-based load balancing, and multipathing; | provisioning simplicity, flow-based load balancing, and multipathing; | |||
| these limitations are important considerations for Data Center (DC) | these limitations are important considerations for Data Center (DC) | |||
| deployments. [RFC7209] describes the motivation for a new solution | deployments. [RFC7209] describes the motivation for a new solution | |||
| skipping to change at page 4, line 47 | skipping to change at page 4, line 47 | |||
| document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. | document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. | |||
| 3. Terminology | 3. Terminology | |||
| Broadcast Domain: In a bridged network, the broadcast domain | Broadcast Domain: In a bridged network, the broadcast domain | |||
| corresponds to a Virtual LAN (VLAN), where a VLAN is typically | corresponds to a Virtual LAN (VLAN), where a VLAN is typically | |||
| represented by a single VLAN ID (VID) but can be represented | represented by a single VLAN ID (VID) but can be represented | |||
| by several VIDs where Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) is used | by several VIDs where Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) is used | |||
| per [802.1Q]. | per [802.1Q]. | |||
| Bridge Domain: An instantiation of a broadcast domain on a | Bridge Table: An instantiation of a broadcast domain on a MAC-VRF. | |||
| bridge node. | ||||
| CE: Customer Edge device, e.g., a host, router, or switch. | CE: Customer Edge device, e.g., a host, router, or switch. | |||
| EVI: An EVPN instance spanning the Provider Edge (PE) devices | EVI: An EVPN instance spanning the Provider Edge (PE) devices | |||
| participating in that EVPN. | participating in that EVPN. | |||
| MAC-VRF: A Virtual Routing and Forwarding table for Media Access | MAC-VRF: A Virtual Routing and Forwarding table for Media Access | |||
| Control (MAC) addresses on a PE for an EVI. | Control (MAC) addresses on a PE for an EVI. | |||
| Ethernet Segment (ES): When a customer site (device or network) is | Ethernet Segment (ES): When a customer site (device or network) is | |||
| skipping to change at page 11, line 15 | skipping to change at page 11, line 15 | |||
| The following Ethernet Tag ID value is reserved: | The following Ethernet Tag ID value is reserved: | |||
| - Ethernet Tag ID {0xFFFFFFFF} is known as MAX-ET. | - Ethernet Tag ID {0xFFFFFFFF} is known as MAX-ET. | |||
| 6.1. VLAN-Based Service Interface | 6.1. VLAN-Based Service Interface | |||
| With this service interface, an EVPN instance consists of only a | With this service interface, an EVPN instance consists of only a | |||
| single broadcast domain (e.g., a single VLAN). Therefore, there is a | single broadcast domain (e.g., a single VLAN). Therefore, there is a | |||
| one-to-one mapping between a VID on this interface and a MAC-VRF. | one-to-one mapping between a VID on this interface and a MAC-VRF. | |||
| Since a MAC-VRF corresponds to a single VLAN, it consists of a single | Since a MAC-VRF corresponds to a single VLAN, it consists of a single | |||
| bridge domain corresponding to that VLAN. If the VLAN is represented | bridge table corresponding to that VLAN. If the VLAN is represented | |||
| by multiple VIDs (e.g., a different VID per Ethernet segment per PE), | by multiple VIDs (e.g., a different VID per Ethernet segment per PE), | |||
| then each PE needs to perform VID translation for frames destined to | then each PE needs to perform VID translation for frames destined to | |||
| its Ethernet segment(s). In such scenarios, the Ethernet frames | its Ethernet segment(s). In such scenarios, the Ethernet frames | |||
| transported over an MPLS/IP network SHOULD remain tagged with the | transported over an MPLS/IP network SHOULD remain tagged with the | |||
| originating VID, and a VID translation MUST be supported in the data | originating VID, and a VID translation MUST be supported in the data | |||
| path and MUST be performed on the disposition PE. The Ethernet Tag | path and MUST be performed on the disposition PE. The Ethernet Tag | |||
| ID in all EVPN routes MUST be set to 0. | ID in all EVPN routes MUST be set to 0. | |||
| 6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface | 6.2. VLAN Bundle Service Interface | |||
| With this service interface, an EVPN instance corresponds to several | With this service interface, an EVPN instance corresponds to multiple | |||
| broadcast domains (e.g., several VLANs); however, only a single | broadcast domains (e.g., multiple VLANs); however, only a single | |||
| bridge domain is maintained per MAC-VRF, which means multiple VLANs | bridge table is maintained per MAC-VRF, which means multiple VLANs | |||
| share the same bridge domain. This implies that MAC addresses MUST | share the same bridge table. This implies that MAC addresses MUST be | |||
| be unique across different VLANs for this service to work. In other | unique across all VLANs for that EVI in order for this service to | |||
| words, there is a many-to-one mapping between VLANs and a MAC-VRF, | work. In other words, there is a many-to-one mapping between VLANs | |||
| and the MAC-VRF consists of a single bridge domain. Furthermore, a | and a MAC-VRF, and the MAC-VRF consists of a single bridge table. | |||
| single VLAN must be represented by a single VID -- e.g., no VID | Furthermore, a single VLAN must be represented by a single VID -- | |||
| translation is allowed for this service interface type. The MPLS | e.g., no VID translation is allowed for this service interface type. | |||
| encapsulated frames MUST remain tagged with the originating VID. Tag | The MPLS-encapsulated frames MUST remain tagged with the originating | |||
| translation is NOT permitted. The Ethernet Tag ID in all EVPN routes | VID. Tag translation is NOT permitted. The Ethernet Tag ID in all | |||
| MUST be set to 0. | EVPN routes MUST be set to 0. | |||
| 6.2.1. Port-Based Service Interface | 6.2.1. Port-Based Service Interface | |||
| This service interface is a special case of the VLAN bundle service | This service interface is a special case of the VLAN bundle service | |||
| interface, where all of the VLANs on the port are part of the same | interface, where all of the VLANs on the port are part of the same | |||
| service and map to the same bundle. The procedures are identical to | service and map to the same bundle. The procedures are identical to | |||
| those described in Section 6.2. | those described in Section 6.2. | |||
| 6.3. VLAN-Aware Bundle Service Interface | 6.3. VLAN-Aware Bundle Service Interface | |||
| With this service interface, an EVPN instance consists of several | With this service interface, an EVPN instance consists of multiple | |||
| broadcast domains (e.g., several VLANs) with each VLAN having its own | broadcast domains (e.g., multiple VLANs) with each VLAN having its | |||
| bridge domain -- i.e., multiple bridge domains (one per VLAN) are | own bridge table -- i.e., multiple bridge tables (one per VLAN) are | |||
| maintained by a single MAC-VRF corresponding to the EVPN instance. | maintained by a single MAC-VRF corresponding to the EVPN instance. | |||
| Broadcast, unknown unicast, or multicast (BUM) traffic is sent only | ||||
| to the CEs in a given broadcast domain; however, the broadcast | ||||
| domains within an EVI either MAY each have their own P-Tunnel or MAY | ||||
| share P-Tunnels -- e.g., all of the broadcast domains in an EVI MAY | ||||
| share a single P-Tunnel. | ||||
| In the case where a single VLAN is represented by a single VID and | ||||
| thus no VID translation is required, an MPLS-encapsulated packet MUST | ||||
| carry that VID. The Ethernet Tag ID in all EVPN routes MUST be set | ||||
| to that VID. The advertising PE MAY advertise the MPLS Label1 in the | ||||
| MAC/IP Advertisement route representing ONLY the EVI or representing | ||||
| both the Ethernet Tag ID and the EVI. This decision is only a local | ||||
| matter by the advertising PE (which is also the disposition PE) and | ||||
| doesn't affect any other PEs. | ||||
| In the case where a single VLAN is represented by different VIDs on | In the case where a single VLAN is represented by different VIDs on | |||
| different CEs and thus VID translation is required, a normalized | different CEs and thus VID translation is required, a normalized | |||
| Ethernet Tag ID (VID) MUST be carried in the MPLS-encapsulated | Ethernet Tag ID (VID) MUST be carried in the EVPN BGP routes. | |||
| frames, and an Ethernet Tag ID translation function MUST be supported | Furthermore, the advertising PE advertises the MPLS Label1 in the | |||
| in the data path. This translation MUST be performed in the data | MAC/IP Advertisement route representing both the Ethernet Tag ID and | |||
| path on both the imposition and disposition PEs (translating to a | the EVI, so that upon receiving an MPLS-encapsulated packet, it can | |||
| normalized Ethernet Tag ID on the imposition PE and translating to a | identify the corresponding bridge table from the MPLS EVPN label and | |||
| local Ethernet Tag ID on the disposition PE). The Ethernet Tag ID in | perform Ethernet Tag ID translation ONLY at the disposition PE -- | |||
| all EVPN routes MUST be set to the normalized value assigned by the | i.e., the Ethernet frames transported over the MPLS/IP network MUST | |||
| remain tagged with the originating VID, and VID translation is | ||||
| performed on the disposition PE. The Ethernet Tag ID in all EVPN | ||||
| routes MUST be set to the normalized Ethernet Tag ID assigned by the | ||||
| EVPN provider. | EVPN provider. | |||
| 6.3.1. Port-Based VLAN-Aware Service Interface | 6.3.1. Port-Based VLAN-Aware Service Interface | |||
| This service interface is a special case of the VLAN-aware bundle | This service interface is a special case of the VLAN-aware bundle | |||
| service interface, where all of the VLANs on the port are part of the | service interface, where all of the VLANs on the port are part of the | |||
| same service and are mapped to a single bundle but without any VID | same service and are mapped to a single bundle but without any VID | |||
| translation. The procedures are a subset of those described in | translation. The procedures are a subset of those described in | |||
| Section 6.3. | Section 6.3. | |||
| skipping to change at page 14, line 35 | skipping to change at page 15, line 10 | |||
| | MPLS Label1 (3 octets) | | | MPLS Label1 (3 octets) | | |||
| +---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| | MPLS Label2 (0 or 3 octets) | | | MPLS Label2 (0 or 3 octets) | | |||
| +---------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------+ | |||
| For the purpose of BGP route key processing, only the Ethernet Tag | For the purpose of BGP route key processing, only the Ethernet Tag | |||
| ID, MAC Address Length, MAC Address, IP Address Length, and IP | ID, MAC Address Length, MAC Address, IP Address Length, and IP | |||
| Address fields are considered to be part of the prefix in the NLRI. | Address fields are considered to be part of the prefix in the NLRI. | |||
| The Ethernet Segment Identifier, MPLS Label1, and MPLS Label2 fields | The Ethernet Segment Identifier, MPLS Label1, and MPLS Label2 fields | |||
| are to be treated as route attributes as opposed to being part of the | are to be treated as route attributes as opposed to being part of the | |||
| "route". The IP address length is in bits. | "route". Both the IP and MAC address lengths are in bits. | |||
| For procedures and usage of this route, please see Sections 9 | For procedures and usage of this route, please see Sections 9 | |||
| ("Determining Reachability to Unicast MAC Addresses") and 14 ("Load | ("Determining Reachability to Unicast MAC Addresses") and 14 ("Load | |||
| Balancing of Unicast Packets"). | Balancing of Unicast Packets"). | |||
| 7.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route | 7.3. Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag Route | |||
| An Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route type specific EVPN NLRI | An Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route type specific EVPN NLRI | |||
| consists of the following: | consists of the following: | |||
| skipping to change at page 17, line 48 | skipping to change at page 18, line 36 | |||
| used to ensure that PEs retain the correct MAC/IP Advertisement route | used to ensure that PEs retain the correct MAC/IP Advertisement route | |||
| when multiple updates occur for the same MAC address. | when multiple updates occur for the same MAC address. | |||
| 7.8. Default Gateway Extended Community | 7.8. Default Gateway Extended Community | |||
| The Default Gateway community is an Extended Community of an Opaque | The Default Gateway community is an Extended Community of an Opaque | |||
| Type (see Section 3.3 of [RFC4360]). It is a transitive community, | Type (see Section 3.3 of [RFC4360]). It is a transitive community, | |||
| which means that the first octet is 0x03. The value of the second | which means that the first octet is 0x03. The value of the second | |||
| octet (Sub-Type) is 0x0d (Default Gateway) as assigned by IANA. The | octet (Sub-Type) is 0x0d (Default Gateway) as assigned by IANA. The | |||
| Value field of this community is reserved (set to 0 by the senders, | Value field of this community is reserved (set to 0 by the senders, | |||
| ignored by the receivers). | ignored by the receivers). For procedures and usage of this | |||
| attribute, please see Section 10.1 ("Default Gateway"). | ||||
| 7.9. Route Distinguisher Assignment per EVI | 7.9. Route Distinguisher Assignment per EVI | |||
| The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be set to the RD of the EVI that is | The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be set to the RD of the EVI that is | |||
| advertising the NLRI. An RD MUST be assigned for a given EVI on a | advertising the NLRI. An RD MUST be assigned for a given EVI on a | |||
| PE. This RD MUST be unique across all EVIs on a PE. It is | PE. This RD MUST be unique across all EVIs on a PE. It is | |||
| RECOMMENDED to use the Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The value field | RECOMMENDED to use the Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The value field | |||
| comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the loopback address) | comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the loopback address) | |||
| followed by a number unique to the PE. This number may be generated | followed by a number unique to the PE. This number may be generated | |||
| by the PE. Or, in the Unique VLAN EVPN case, the low-order 12 bits | by the PE. Or, in the Unique VLAN EVPN case, the low-order 12 bits | |||
| skipping to change at page 18, line 25 | skipping to change at page 19, line 13 | |||
| to 0. | to 0. | |||
| 7.10. Route Targets | 7.10. Route Targets | |||
| The EVPN route MAY carry one or more Route Target (RT) attributes. | The EVPN route MAY carry one or more Route Target (RT) attributes. | |||
| RTs may be configured (as in IP VPNs) or may be derived | RTs may be configured (as in IP VPNs) or may be derived | |||
| automatically. | automatically. | |||
| If a PE uses RT Constraint, the PE advertises all such RTs using RT | If a PE uses RT Constraint, the PE advertises all such RTs using RT | |||
| Constraints per [RFC4684]. The use of RT Constraints allows each | Constraints per [RFC4684]. The use of RT Constraints allows each | |||
| Ethernet A-D route to reach only those PEs that are configured to | EVPN route to reach only those PEs that are configured to import at | |||
| import at least one RT from the set of RTs carried in the EVPN route. | least one RT from the set of RTs carried in the EVPN route. | |||
| 7.10.1. Auto-derivation from the Ethernet Tag ID | 7.10.1. Auto-derivation from the Ethernet Tag ID | |||
| For the "Unique VLAN EVPN" scenario, it is highly desirable to | For the "Unique VLAN EVPN" scenario, it is highly desirable to | |||
| auto-derive the RT from the Ethernet Tag ID (VLAN ID) for that EVPN | auto-derive the RT from the Ethernet Tag ID (VLAN ID) for that EVPN | |||
| instance. The procedure for performing such auto-derivation is as | instance. The procedure for performing such auto-derivation is as | |||
| follows: | follows: | |||
| + The Global Administrator field of the RT MUST be set to the | + The Global Administrator field of the RT MUST be set to the | |||
| Autonomous System (AS) number with which the PE is associated. | Autonomous System (AS) number with which the PE is associated. | |||
| skipping to change at page 19, line 9 | skipping to change at page 19, line 45 | |||
| 8.1. Multihomed Ethernet Segment Auto-discovery | 8.1. Multihomed Ethernet Segment Auto-discovery | |||
| PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment can automatically discover | PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment can automatically discover | |||
| each other with minimal to no configuration through the exchange of | each other with minimal to no configuration through the exchange of | |||
| the Ethernet Segment route. | the Ethernet Segment route. | |||
| 8.1.1. Constructing the Ethernet Segment Route | 8.1.1. Constructing the Ethernet Segment Route | |||
| The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The | The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The | |||
| value field comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the | value field comprises an IP address of the PE (typically, the | |||
| loopback address) followed by zeroes. | loopback address) followed by a number unique to the PE. | |||
| The Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI) MUST be set to the 10-octet | The Ethernet Segment Identifier (ESI) MUST be set to the 10-octet | |||
| value described in Section 5. | value described in Section 5. | |||
| The BGP advertisement that advertises the Ethernet Segment route MUST | The BGP advertisement that advertises the Ethernet Segment route MUST | |||
| also carry an ES-Import route target, as defined in Section 7.6. | also carry an ES-Import Route Target, as defined in Section 7.6. | |||
| The Ethernet Segment route filtering MUST be done such that the | The Ethernet Segment route filtering MUST be done such that the | |||
| Ethernet Segment route is imported only by the PEs that are | Ethernet Segment route is imported only by the PEs that are | |||
| multihomed to the same Ethernet segment. To that end, each PE that | multihomed to the same Ethernet segment. To that end, each PE that | |||
| is connected to a particular Ethernet segment constructs an import | is connected to a particular Ethernet segment constructs an import | |||
| filtering rule to import a route that carries the ES-Import extended | filtering rule to import a route that carries the ES-Import Route | |||
| community, constructed from the ESI. | Target, constructed from the ESI. | |||
| 8.2. Fast Convergence | 8.2. Fast Convergence | |||
| In EVPN, MAC address reachability is learned via the BGP control | In EVPN, MAC address reachability is learned via the BGP control | |||
| plane over the MPLS network. As such, in the absence of any fast | plane over the MPLS network. As such, in the absence of any fast | |||
| protection mechanism, the network convergence time is a function of | protection mechanism, the network convergence time is a function of | |||
| the number of MAC/IP Advertisement routes that must be withdrawn by | the number of MAC/IP Advertisement routes that must be withdrawn by | |||
| the PE encountering a failure. For highly scaled environments, this | the PE encountering a failure. For highly scaled environments, this | |||
| scheme yields slow convergence. | scheme yields slow convergence. | |||
| skipping to change at page 20, line 6 | skipping to change at page 20, line 42 | |||
| of RTs. Each Ethernet A-D per ES route is differentiated from the | of RTs. Each Ethernet A-D per ES route is differentiated from the | |||
| other routes in the set by a different Route Distinguisher (RD). | other routes in the set by a different Route Distinguisher (RD). | |||
| Upon a failure in connectivity to the attached segment, the PE | Upon a failure in connectivity to the attached segment, the PE | |||
| withdraws the corresponding set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes. This | withdraws the corresponding set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes. This | |||
| triggers all PEs that receive the withdrawal to update their next-hop | triggers all PEs that receive the withdrawal to update their next-hop | |||
| adjacencies for all MAC addresses associated with the Ethernet | adjacencies for all MAC addresses associated with the Ethernet | |||
| segment in question. If no other PE had advertised an Ethernet A-D | segment in question. If no other PE had advertised an Ethernet A-D | |||
| route for the same segment, then the PE that received the withdrawal | route for the same segment, then the PE that received the withdrawal | |||
| simply invalidates the MAC entries for that segment. Otherwise, the | simply invalidates the MAC entries for that segment. Otherwise, the | |||
| PE updates the next-hop adjacencies to point to the backup PE(s). | PE updates its next-hop adjacencies accordingly. | |||
| 8.2.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per Ethernet Segment Route | 8.2.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per Ethernet Segment Route | |||
| This section describes the procedures used to construct the Ethernet | This section describes the procedures used to construct the Ethernet | |||
| A-D per ES route, which is used for fast convergence (as discussed | A-D per ES route, which is used for fast convergence (as discussed | |||
| above) and for advertising the ESI label used for split-horizon | above) and for advertising the ESI label used for split-horizon | |||
| filtering (as discussed in Section 8.3). Support of this route is | filtering (as discussed in Section 8.3). Support of this route is | |||
| REQUIRED. | REQUIRED. | |||
| The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The | The Route Distinguisher (RD) MUST be a Type 1 RD [RFC4364]. The | |||
| skipping to change at page 24, line 51 | skipping to change at page 25, line 45 | |||
| Note that the Ethernet A-D per EVI route may be received by a remote | Note that the Ethernet A-D per EVI route may be received by a remote | |||
| PE before it receives the set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes. | PE before it receives the set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes. | |||
| Therefore, in order to handle corner cases and race conditions, the | Therefore, in order to handle corner cases and race conditions, the | |||
| Ethernet A-D per EVI route MUST NOT be used for traffic forwarding by | Ethernet A-D per EVI route MUST NOT be used for traffic forwarding by | |||
| a remote PE until it also receives the associated set of Ethernet A-D | a remote PE until it also receives the associated set of Ethernet A-D | |||
| per ES routes. | per ES routes. | |||
| The backup path is a closely related function, but it is used in | The backup path is a closely related function, but it is used in | |||
| Single-Active redundancy mode. In this case, a PE also advertises | Single-Active redundancy mode. In this case, a PE also advertises | |||
| that it has reachability to a give EVI/ES using the same combination | that it has reachability to a given EVI/ES using the same combination | |||
| of Ethernet A-D per EVI route and Ethernet A-D per ES route as | of Ethernet A-D per EVI route and Ethernet A-D per ES route as | |||
| discussed above, but with the "Single-Active" bit in the flags of the | discussed above, but with the "Single-Active" bit in the flags of the | |||
| ESI Label extended community set to 1. A remote PE that receives a | ESI Label extended community set to 1. A remote PE that receives a | |||
| MAC/IP Advertisement route with a non-reserved ESI SHOULD consider | MAC/IP Advertisement route with a non-reserved ESI SHOULD consider | |||
| the advertised MAC address to be reachable via any PE that has | the advertised MAC address to be reachable via any PE that has | |||
| advertised this combination of Ethernet A-D routes, and it SHOULD | advertised this combination of Ethernet A-D routes, and it SHOULD | |||
| install a backup path for that MAC address. | install a backup path for that MAC address. | |||
| 8.4.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance Route | 8.4.1. Constructing Ethernet A-D per EVPN Instance Route | |||
| skipping to change at page 25, line 35 | skipping to change at page 26, line 28 | |||
| The Ethernet Tag ID is the identifier of an Ethernet tag on the | The Ethernet Tag ID is the identifier of an Ethernet tag on the | |||
| Ethernet segment. This value may be a 12-bit VLAN ID, in which case | Ethernet segment. This value may be a 12-bit VLAN ID, in which case | |||
| the low-order 12 bits are set to the VLAN ID and the high-order | the low-order 12 bits are set to the VLAN ID and the high-order | |||
| 20 bits are set to 0. Or, it may be another Ethernet tag used by the | 20 bits are set to 0. Or, it may be another Ethernet tag used by the | |||
| EVPN. It MAY be set to the default Ethernet tag on the Ethernet | EVPN. It MAY be set to the default Ethernet tag on the Ethernet | |||
| segment or to the value 0. | segment or to the value 0. | |||
| Note that the above allows the Ethernet A-D route to be advertised | Note that the above allows the Ethernet A-D route to be advertised | |||
| with one of the following granularities: | with one of the following granularities: | |||
| + One Ethernet A-D route for a given <ESI, Ethernet Tag ID> tuple per | + One Ethernet A-D route per <ESI, Ethernet Tag ID> tuple per EVI. | |||
| EVI. This is applicable when the PE uses MPLS-based disposition. | This is applicable when the PE uses MPLS-based disposition with VID | |||
| translation or may be applicable when the PE uses MAC-based | ||||
| disposition with VID translation. | ||||
| + One Ethernet A-D route per <ESI, EVI> (where the Ethernet Tag ID is | + One Ethernet A-D route for each <ESI> per EVI (where the Ethernet | |||
| set to 0). This is applicable when the PE uses MAC-based | Tag ID is set to 0). This is applicable when the PE uses MAC-based | |||
| disposition, or when the PE uses MPLS-based disposition when no | disposition or MPLS-based disposition without VID translation. | |||
| VLAN translation is required. | ||||
| The usage of the MPLS label is described in Section 14 ("Load | The usage of the MPLS label is described in Section 14 ("Load | |||
| Balancing of Unicast Packets"). | Balancing of Unicast Packets"). | |||
| The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | |||
| be set to the IPv4 or IPv6 address of the advertising PE. | be set to the IPv4 or IPv6 address of the advertising PE. | |||
| The Ethernet A-D route MUST carry one or more Route Target (RT) | The Ethernet A-D route MUST carry one or more Route Target (RT) | |||
| attributes, per Section 7.10. | attributes, per Section 7.10. | |||
| skipping to change at page 27, line 17 | skipping to change at page 28, line 20 | |||
| extended community attribute. | extended community attribute. | |||
| 2. The PE then starts a timer (default value = 3 seconds) to allow | 2. The PE then starts a timer (default value = 3 seconds) to allow | |||
| the reception of Ethernet Segment routes from other PE nodes | the reception of Ethernet Segment routes from other PE nodes | |||
| connected to the same Ethernet segment. This timer value should | connected to the same Ethernet segment. This timer value should | |||
| be the same across all PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment. | be the same across all PEs connected to the same Ethernet segment. | |||
| 3. When the timer expires, each PE builds an ordered list of the IP | 3. When the timer expires, each PE builds an ordered list of the IP | |||
| addresses of all the PE nodes connected to the Ethernet segment | addresses of all the PE nodes connected to the Ethernet segment | |||
| (including itself), in increasing numeric value. Each IP address | (including itself), in increasing numeric value. Each IP address | |||
| in this list is extracted from the "Originator Router's IP | in this list is extracted from the "Originating Router's IP | |||
| address" field of the advertised Ethernet Segment route. Every PE | address" field of the advertised Ethernet Segment route. Every PE | |||
| is then given an ordinal indicating its position in the ordered | is then given an ordinal indicating its position in the ordered | |||
| list, starting with 0 as the ordinal for the PE with the | list, starting with 0 as the ordinal for the PE with the | |||
| numerically lowest IP address. The ordinals are used to determine | numerically lowest IP address. The ordinals are used to determine | |||
| which PE node will be the DF for a given EVPN instance on the | which PE node will be the DF for a given EVPN instance on the | |||
| Ethernet segment, using the following rule: | Ethernet segment, using the following rule: | |||
| Assuming a redundancy group of N PE nodes, the PE with ordinal i | Assuming a redundancy group of N PE nodes, the PE with ordinal i | |||
| is the DF for an EVPN instance with an associated Ethernet tag | is the DF for an EVPN instance with an associated Ethernet tag | |||
| value V when (V mod N) = i. In the case where multiple Ethernet | value V when (V mod N) = i. In the case where multiple Ethernet | |||
| tags are associated with a single EVPN instance, then the | tags are associated with a single EVPN instance, then the | |||
| numerically lowest Ethernet tag value in that EVPN instance on | numerically lowest Ethernet tag value in that EVPN instance on | |||
| that ES MUST be used in the modulo function. | that ES MUST be used in the modulo function. | |||
| It should be noted that using the "Originator Router's IP address" | It should be noted that using the "Originating Router's IP | |||
| field in the Ethernet Segment route to get the PE IP address | address" field in the Ethernet Segment route to get the PE IP | |||
| needed for the ordered list allows for a CE to be multihomed | address needed for the ordered list allows for a CE to be | |||
| across different ASes if such a need ever arises. | multihomed across different ASes if such a need ever arises. | |||
| 4. The PE that is elected as a DF for a given EVPN instance will | 4. The PE that is elected as a DF for a given EVPN instance will | |||
| unblock traffic for the Ethernet tags associated with that EVPN | unblock traffic for the Ethernet tags associated with that EVPN | |||
| instance. Note that the DF PE unblocks multi-destination traffic | instance. Note that the DF PE unblocks multi-destination traffic | |||
| in the egress direction towards the segment. All non-DF PEs | in the egress direction towards the segment. All non-DF PEs | |||
| continue to drop multi-destination traffic (for the associated | continue to drop multi-destination traffic (for the associated | |||
| EVPN instances) in the egress direction towards the segment. | EVPN instances) in the egress direction towards the segment. | |||
| In the case of link or port failure, the affected PE withdraws its | In the case of link or port failure, the affected PE withdraws its | |||
| Ethernet Segment route. This will re-trigger the service carving | Ethernet Segment route. This will re-trigger the service carving | |||
| skipping to change at page 30, line 7 | skipping to change at page 31, line 19 | |||
| The RD MUST be the RD of the EVI that is advertising the NLRI. The | The RD MUST be the RD of the EVI that is advertising the NLRI. The | |||
| procedures for setting the RD for a given EVI are described in | procedures for setting the RD for a given EVI are described in | |||
| Section 7.9. | Section 7.9. | |||
| The Ethernet Segment Identifier is set to the 10-octet ESI described | The Ethernet Segment Identifier is set to the 10-octet ESI described | |||
| in Section 5 ("Ethernet Segment"). | in Section 5 ("Ethernet Segment"). | |||
| The Ethernet Tag ID may be zero or may represent a valid Ethernet | The Ethernet Tag ID may be zero or may represent a valid Ethernet | |||
| Tag ID. This field may be non-zero when there are multiple bridge | Tag ID. This field may be non-zero when there are multiple bridge | |||
| domains in the MAC-VRF (i.e., the PE needs to perform qualified | tables in the MAC-VRF (i.e., the PE needs to support VLAN-aware | |||
| learning for the VLANs in that MAC-VRF). | bundle service for that EVI). | |||
| When the Ethernet Tag ID in the NLRI is set to a non-zero value for a | When the Ethernet Tag ID in the NLRI is set to a non-zero value for a | |||
| particular bridge domain, then this Ethernet Tag ID may be either the | particular bridge table, then this Ethernet Tag ID may be either the | |||
| CE's Ethernet tag value (e.g., CE VLAN ID) or the EVPN provider's | CE's Ethernet tag value (e.g., CE VLAN ID) or the EVPN provider's | |||
| Ethernet tag value (e.g., provider VLAN ID). The latter would be the | Ethernet tag value (e.g., provider VLAN ID). The latter would be the | |||
| case if the CE Ethernet tags (e.g., CE VLAN ID) for a particular | case if the CE Ethernet tags (e.g., CE VLAN ID) for a particular | |||
| bridge domain are different on different CEs. | bridge table are different on different CEs. | |||
| The MAC Address Length field is in bits, and it is set to 48. MAC | The MAC Address Length field is in bits, and it is set to 48. MAC | |||
| address length values other than 48 bits are outside the scope of | address length values other than 48 bits are outside the scope of | |||
| this document. The encoding of a MAC address MUST be the 6-octet MAC | this document. The encoding of a MAC address MUST be the 6-octet MAC | |||
| address specified by [802.1Q] and [802.1D-REV]. | address specified by [802.1Q] and [802.1D-REV]. | |||
| The IP Address field is optional. By default, the IP Address Length | The IP Address field is optional. By default, the IP Address Length | |||
| field is set to 0, and the IP Address field is omitted from the | field is set to 0, and the IP Address field is omitted from the | |||
| route. When a valid IP address needs to be advertised, it is then | route. When a valid IP address needs to be advertised, it is then | |||
| encoded in this route. When an IP address is present, the IP Address | encoded in this route. When an IP address is present, the IP Address | |||
| skipping to change at page 30, line 45 | skipping to change at page 32, line 8 | |||
| 20 bits contain the label value. The MPLS Label1 MUST be downstream | 20 bits contain the label value. The MPLS Label1 MUST be downstream | |||
| assigned, and it is associated with the MAC address being advertised | assigned, and it is associated with the MAC address being advertised | |||
| by the advertising PE. The advertising PE uses this label when it | by the advertising PE. The advertising PE uses this label when it | |||
| receives an MPLS-encapsulated packet to perform forwarding based on | receives an MPLS-encapsulated packet to perform forwarding based on | |||
| the destination MAC address toward the CE. The forwarding procedures | the destination MAC address toward the CE. The forwarding procedures | |||
| are specified in Sections 13 and 14. | are specified in Sections 13 and 14. | |||
| A PE may advertise the same single EVPN label for all MAC addresses | A PE may advertise the same single EVPN label for all MAC addresses | |||
| in a given EVI. This label assignment is referred to as a per EVI | in a given EVI. This label assignment is referred to as a per EVI | |||
| label assignment. Alternatively, a PE may advertise a unique EVPN | label assignment. Alternatively, a PE may advertise a unique EVPN | |||
| label per <ESI, Ethernet tag> combination. This label assignment is | label per <EVI, Ethernet tag> combination. This label assignment is | |||
| referred to as a per <ESI, Ethernet tag> label assignment. As a | referred to as a per <EVI, Ethernet tag> label assignment. As a | |||
| third option, a PE may advertise a unique EVPN label per MAC address. | third option, a PE may advertise a unique EVPN label per <ESI, | |||
| This label assignment is referred to as a per MAC label assignment. | Ethernet tag> combination. This label assignment is referred to as a | |||
| All of these label assignment methods have their trade-offs. The | per <ESI, Ethernet tag> label assignment. As a fourth option, a PE | |||
| choice of a particular label assignment methodology is purely local | may advertise a unique EVPN label per MAC address. This label | |||
| to the PE that originates the route. | assignment is referred to as a per MAC label assignment. All of | |||
| these label assignment methods have their trade-offs. The choice of | ||||
| a particular label assignment methodology is purely local to the PE | ||||
| that originates the route. | ||||
| An assignment per EVI label requires the least number of EVPN labels | An assignment per EVI label requires the least number of EVPN labels | |||
| but requires a MAC lookup in addition to an MPLS lookup on an egress | but requires a MAC lookup in addition to an MPLS lookup on an egress | |||
| PE for forwarding. On the other hand, a unique label per <ESI, | PE for forwarding. On the other hand, a unique label per <ESI, | |||
| Ethernet tag> or a unique label per MAC allows an egress PE to | Ethernet tag> or a unique label per MAC allows an egress PE to | |||
| forward a packet that it receives from another PE, to the connected | forward a packet that it receives from another PE, to the connected | |||
| CE, after looking up only the MPLS labels without having to perform a | CE, after looking up only the MPLS labels without having to perform a | |||
| MAC lookup. This includes the capability to perform appropriate VLAN | MAC lookup. This includes the capability to perform appropriate VLAN | |||
| ID translation on egress to the CE. | ID translation on egress to the CE. | |||
| skipping to change at page 35, line 38 | skipping to change at page 37, line 11 | |||
| The Ethernet Tag ID is the identifier of the Ethernet tag. It may be | The Ethernet Tag ID is the identifier of the Ethernet tag. It may be | |||
| set to 0 or to a valid Ethernet tag value. | set to 0 or to a valid Ethernet tag value. | |||
| The Originating Router's IP Address field value MUST be set to an IP | The Originating Router's IP Address field value MUST be set to an IP | |||
| address of the PE that should be common for all the EVIs on the PE | address of the PE that should be common for all the EVIs on the PE | |||
| (e.g., this address may be the PE's loopback address). The IP | (e.g., this address may be the PE's loopback address). The IP | |||
| Address Length field is in bits. | Address Length field is in bits. | |||
| The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | The Next Hop field of the MP_REACH_NLRI attribute of the route MUST | |||
| be set to the same IP address as the one carried in the Originating | be set to the IPv4 or IPv6 address of the advertising PE. | |||
| Router's IP Address field. | ||||
| The BGP advertisement for the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route | The BGP advertisement for the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag route | |||
| MUST also carry one or more Route Target (RT) attributes. The | MUST also carry one or more Route Target (RT) attributes. The | |||
| assignment of RTs as described in Section 7.10 MUST be followed. | assignment of RTs as described in Section 7.10 MUST be followed. | |||
| 11.2. P-Tunnel Identification | 11.2. P-Tunnel Identification | |||
| In order to identify the P-tunnel used for sending broadcast, unknown | In order to identify the P-tunnel used for sending broadcast, unknown | |||
| unicast, or multicast traffic, the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag | unicast, or multicast traffic, the Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag | |||
| route MUST carry a Provider Multicast Service Interface (PMSI) Tunnel | route MUST carry a Provider Multicast Service Interface (PMSI) Tunnel | |||
| skipping to change at page 38, line 51 | skipping to change at page 40, line 36 | |||
| If the MAC address is unknown and if the administrative policy on the | If the MAC address is unknown and if the administrative policy on the | |||
| PE requires flooding of unknown unicast traffic, then: | PE requires flooding of unknown unicast traffic, then: | |||
| - The PE MUST flood the packet to other PEs. The PE MUST first | - The PE MUST flood the packet to other PEs. The PE MUST first | |||
| encapsulate the packet in the ESI MPLS label as described in | encapsulate the packet in the ESI MPLS label as described in | |||
| Section 8.3. If ingress replication is used, the packet MUST be | Section 8.3. If ingress replication is used, the packet MUST be | |||
| replicated to each remote PE, with the VPN label being an MPLS | replicated to each remote PE, with the VPN label being an MPLS | |||
| label determined as follows: This is the MPLS label advertised by | label determined as follows: This is the MPLS label advertised by | |||
| the remote PE in a PMSI Tunnel attribute in the Inclusive Multicast | the remote PE in a PMSI Tunnel attribute in the Inclusive Multicast | |||
| Ethernet Tag route for an <EVPN instance, Ethernet tag> | Ethernet Tag route for an <EVI> or <EVI, Ethernet tag> combination. | |||
| combination. The Ethernet tag in the route may be the same as the | ||||
| Ethernet tag associated with the interface on which the ingress PE | The Ethernet tag in the route may be the same as the Ethernet tag | |||
| receives the packet. If P2MP LSPs are being used, the packet MUST | associated with the interface on which the ingress PE receives the | |||
| be sent on the P2MP LSP of which the PE is the root, for the | packet. If P2MP LSPs are being used, the packet MUST be sent on | |||
| Ethernet tag in the EVPN instance. If the same P2MP LSP is used | the P2MP LSP of which the PE is the root, for the Ethernet tag in | |||
| for all Ethernet tags, then all the PEs in the EVPN instance MUST | the EVPN instance. If the same P2MP LSP is used for all Ethernet | |||
| be the leaves of the P2MP LSP. If a distinct P2MP LSP is used for | tags, then all the PEs in the EVPN instance MUST be the leaves of | |||
| a given Ethernet tag in the EVPN instance, then only the PEs in the | the P2MP LSP. If a distinct P2MP LSP is used for a given Ethernet | |||
| Ethernet tag MUST be the leaves of the P2MP LSP. The packet MUST | tag in the EVPN instance, then only the PEs in the Ethernet tag | |||
| be encapsulated in the P2MP LSP label stack. | MUST be the leaves of the P2MP LSP. The packet MUST be | |||
| encapsulated in the P2MP LSP label stack. | ||||
| If the MAC address is unknown, then, if the administrative policy on | If the MAC address is unknown, then, if the administrative policy on | |||
| the PE does not allow flooding of unknown unicast traffic: | the PE does not allow flooding of unknown unicast traffic: | |||
| - the PE MUST drop the packet. | - the PE MUST drop the packet. | |||
| 13.2. Forwarding Packets Received from a Remote PE | 13.2. Forwarding Packets Received from a Remote PE | |||
| This section describes the procedures for forwarding known and | This section describes the procedures for forwarding known and | |||
| unknown unicast packets received from a remote PE. | unknown unicast packets received from a remote PE. | |||
| skipping to change at page 40, line 20 | skipping to change at page 41, line 49 | |||
| the label or does a destination MAC address lookup to forward the | the label or does a destination MAC address lookup to forward the | |||
| packet to a CE. | packet to a CE. | |||
| 14. Load Balancing of Unicast Packets | 14. Load Balancing of Unicast Packets | |||
| This section specifies the load-balancing procedures for sending | This section specifies the load-balancing procedures for sending | |||
| known unicast packets to a multihomed CE. | known unicast packets to a multihomed CE. | |||
| 14.1. Load Balancing of Traffic from a PE to Remote CEs | 14.1. Load Balancing of Traffic from a PE to Remote CEs | |||
| Whenever a remote PE imports a MAC advertisement for a given <ESI, | Whenever a remote PE imports a MAC/IP Advertisement route for a given | |||
| Ethernet tag> in an EVI, it MUST examine all imported Ethernet A-D | <ESI, Ethernet tag> in an EVI, it MUST examine all imported Ethernet | |||
| routes for that ESI in order to determine the load-balancing | A-D routes for that ESI in order to determine the load-balancing | |||
| characteristics of the Ethernet segment. | characteristics of the Ethernet segment. | |||
| 14.1.1. Single-Active Redundancy Mode | 14.1.1. Single-Active Redundancy Mode | |||
| For a given ES, if the remote PE has imported the set of Ethernet A-D | For a given ES, if the remote PE has imported the set of Ethernet A-D | |||
| per ES routes from at least one PE, where the "Single-Active" flag in | per ES routes from at least one PE, where the "Single-Active" flag in | |||
| the ESI Label extended community is set, then the remote PE MUST | the ESI Label extended community is set, then the remote PE MUST | |||
| deduce that the ES is operating in Single-Active redundancy mode. As | deduce that the ES is operating in Single-Active redundancy mode. As | |||
| such, the MAC address will be reachable only via the PE announcing | such, the MAC address will be reachable only via the PE announcing | |||
| the associated MAC/IP Advertisement route -- this is referred to as | the associated MAC/IP Advertisement route -- this is referred to as | |||
| the primary PE. The other PEs advertising the set of Ethernet A-D | the primary PE. The other PEs advertising the set of Ethernet A-D | |||
| per ES routes for the same ES provide backup paths for that ES, in | per ES routes for the same ES provide backup paths for that ES, in | |||
| case the primary PE encounters a failure, and are referred to as | case the primary PE encounters a failure, and are referred to as | |||
| backup PEs. It should be noted that the primary PE for a given <ES, | backup PEs. It should be noted that the primary PE for a given <ESI, | |||
| EVI> is the DF for that <ES, EVI>. | EVI> is the DF for that <ESI, EVI>. | |||
| If the primary PE encounters a failure, it MAY withdraw its set of | If the primary PE encounters a failure, it MAY withdraw its set of | |||
| Ethernet A-D per ES routes for the affected ES prior to withdrawing | Ethernet A-D per ES routes for the affected ES prior to withdrawing | |||
| its set of MAC/IP Advertisement routes. | its set of MAC/IP Advertisement routes. | |||
| If there is only one backup PE for a given ES, the remote PE MAY use | If there is only one backup PE for a given ES, the remote PE MAY use | |||
| the primary PE's withdrawal of its set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes | the primary PE's withdrawal of its set of Ethernet A-D per ES routes | |||
| as a trigger to update its forwarding entries, for the associated MAC | as a trigger to update its forwarding entries, for the associated MAC | |||
| addresses, to point towards the backup PE. As the backup PE starts | addresses, to point towards the backup PE. As the backup PE starts | |||
| learning the MAC addresses over its attached ES, it will start | learning the MAC addresses over its attached ES, it will start | |||
| skipping to change at page 46, line 19 | skipping to change at page 47, line 50 | |||
| 16.1. Ingress Replication | 16.1. Ingress Replication | |||
| The PEs may use ingress replication for flooding BUM traffic as | The PEs may use ingress replication for flooding BUM traffic as | |||
| described in Section 11 ("Handling of Multi-destination Traffic"). A | described in Section 11 ("Handling of Multi-destination Traffic"). A | |||
| given broadcast packet must be sent to all the remote PEs. However, | given broadcast packet must be sent to all the remote PEs. However, | |||
| a given multicast packet for a multicast flow may be sent to only a | a given multicast packet for a multicast flow may be sent to only a | |||
| subset of the PEs. Specifically, a given multicast flow may be sent | subset of the PEs. Specifically, a given multicast flow may be sent | |||
| to only those PEs that have receivers that are interested in the | to only those PEs that have receivers that are interested in the | |||
| multicast flow. Determining which of the PEs have receivers for a | multicast flow. Determining which of the PEs have receivers for a | |||
| given multicast flow is done using explicit tracking, as described | given multicast flow is done using explicit tracking per [RFC7117]. | |||
| below. | ||||
| 16.2. P2MP LSPs | 16.2. P2MP LSPs | |||
| A PE may use an "Inclusive" tree for sending a BUM packet. This | A PE may use an "Inclusive" tree for sending a BUM packet. This | |||
| terminology is borrowed from [RFC7117]. | terminology is borrowed from [RFC7117]. | |||
| A variety of transport technologies may be used in the service | A variety of transport technologies may be used in the service | |||
| provider (SP) network. For Inclusive P-multicast trees, these | provider (SP) network. For Inclusive P-multicast trees, these | |||
| transport technologies include point-to-multipoint LSPs created by | transport technologies include point-to-multipoint LSPs created by | |||
| RSVP-TE or Multipoint LDP (mLDP). | RSVP-TE or Multipoint LDP (mLDP). | |||
| skipping to change at page 47, line 41 | skipping to change at page 49, line 30 | |||
| session. This failure detection can be in the sub-second range if | session. This failure detection can be in the sub-second range if | |||
| Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is used to detect BGP | Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is used to detect BGP | |||
| session failures. PE3 can update its forwarding state to start | session failures. PE3 can update its forwarding state to start | |||
| sending all traffic for CE1 to only PE2. | sending all traffic for CE1 to only PE2. | |||
| 17.3. PE-to-CE Network Failures | 17.3. PE-to-CE Network Failures | |||
| If the connectivity between the multihomed CE and one of the PEs to | If the connectivity between the multihomed CE and one of the PEs to | |||
| which it is attached fails, the PE MUST withdraw the set of Ethernet | which it is attached fails, the PE MUST withdraw the set of Ethernet | |||
| A-D per ES routes that had been previously advertised for that ES. | A-D per ES routes that had been previously advertised for that ES. | |||
| When the MAC entry on the PE ages out, the PE MUST withdraw the MAC | This enables the remote PEs to remove the MPLS next hop to this | |||
| address from BGP. Note that to aid convergence, the Ethernet A-D per | particular PE from the set of MPLS next hops that can be used to | |||
| EVI routes MAY be withdrawn before the MAC routes. This enables the | forward traffic to the CE. When the MAC entry on the PE ages out, | |||
| remote PEs to remove the MPLS next hop to this particular PE from the | the PE MUST withdraw the MAC address from BGP. | |||
| set of MPLS next hops that can be used to forward traffic to the CE. | ||||
| When an Ethernet tag is decommissioned on an Ethernet segment, then | When an Ethernet tag is decommissioned on an Ethernet segment, then | |||
| the PE MUST withdraw the Ethernet A-D per EVI route(s) announced for | the PE MUST withdraw the Ethernet A-D per EVI route(s) announced for | |||
| the <ESI, Ethernet tags> that are impacted by the decommissioning. | the <ESI, Ethernet tags> that are impacted by the decommissioning. | |||
| In addition, the PE MUST also withdraw the MAC/IP Advertisement | In addition, the PE MUST also withdraw the MAC/IP Advertisement | |||
| routes that are impacted by the decommissioning. | routes that are impacted by the decommissioning. | |||
| The Ethernet A-D per ES routes should be used by an implementation to | The Ethernet A-D per ES routes should be used by an implementation to | |||
| optimize the withdrawal of MAC/IP Advertisement routes. When a PE | optimize the withdrawal of MAC/IP Advertisement routes. When a PE | |||
| receives a withdrawal of a particular Ethernet A-D route from an | receives a withdrawal of a particular Ethernet A-D route from an | |||
| skipping to change at page 48, line 34 | skipping to change at page 50, line 25 | |||
| the destination out of order. This out-of-order delivery can happen | the destination out of order. This out-of-order delivery can happen | |||
| during steady state in the absence of any failures, resulting in | during steady state in the absence of any failures, resulting in | |||
| significant impact on network operations. | significant impact on network operations. | |||
| In order to avoid any such misordering, the following rules are | In order to avoid any such misordering, the following rules are | |||
| applied: | applied: | |||
| - If a network uses deep packet inspection for its ECMP, then the | - If a network uses deep packet inspection for its ECMP, then the | |||
| "Preferred PW MPLS Control Word" [RFC4385] SHOULD be used with the | "Preferred PW MPLS Control Word" [RFC4385] SHOULD be used with the | |||
| value 0 (e.g., a 4-octet field with a value of zero) when sending | value 0 (e.g., a 4-octet field with a value of zero) when sending | |||
| EVPN encapsulated packets over an MP2P LSP. | EVPN-encapsulated packets over an MP2P LSP. | |||
| - If a network uses entropy labels [RFC6790], then the control word | - If a network uses entropy labels [RFC6790], then the control word | |||
| SHOULD NOT be used when sending EVPN encapsulated packets over an | SHOULD NOT be used when sending EVPN-encapsulated packets over an | |||
| MP2P LSP. | MP2P LSP. | |||
| - When sending EVPN encapsulated packets over a P2MP LSP or P2P LSP, | - When sending EVPN-encapsulated packets over a P2MP LSP or P2P LSP, | |||
| then the control word SHOULD NOT be used. | then the control word SHOULD NOT be used. | |||
| 19. Security Considerations | 19. Security Considerations | |||
| Security considerations discussed in [RFC4761] and [RFC4762] apply to | Security considerations discussed in [RFC4761] and [RFC4762] apply to | |||
| this document for MAC learning in the data plane over an Attachment | this document for MAC learning in the data plane over an Attachment | |||
| Circuit (AC) and for flooding of unknown unicast and ARP messages | Circuit (AC) and for flooding of unknown unicast and ARP messages | |||
| over the MPLS/IP core. Security considerations discussed in | over the MPLS/IP core. Security considerations discussed in | |||
| [RFC4364] apply to this document for MAC learning in the control | [RFC4364] apply to this document for MAC learning in the control | |||
| plane over the MPLS/IP core. This section describes additional | plane over the MPLS/IP core. This section describes additional | |||
| skipping to change at page 50, line 20 | skipping to change at page 52, line 16 | |||
| This document defines a new NLRI, called "EVPN", to be carried in BGP | This document defines a new NLRI, called "EVPN", to be carried in BGP | |||
| using multiprotocol extensions. This NLRI uses the existing AFI of | using multiprotocol extensions. This NLRI uses the existing AFI of | |||
| 25 (L2VPN). IANA has assigned BGP EVPNs a SAFI value of 70. | 25 (L2VPN). IANA has assigned BGP EVPNs a SAFI value of 70. | |||
| IANA has allocated the following EVPN Extended Community sub-types in | IANA has allocated the following EVPN Extended Community sub-types in | |||
| [RFC7153], and this document is the only reference for them. | [RFC7153], and this document is the only reference for them. | |||
| 0x00 MAC Mobility [RFC7432] | 0x00 MAC Mobility [RFC7432] | |||
| 0x01 ESI Label [RFC7432] | 0x01 ESI Label [RFC7432] | |||
| 0x02 ES-Import Route Targe [RFC7432] | 0x02 ES-Import Route Target [RFC7432] | |||
| This document creates a registry called "EVPN Route Types". New | This document creates a registry called "EVPN Route Types". New | |||
| registrations will be made through the "RFC Required" procedure | registrations will be made through the "RFC Required" procedure | |||
| defined in [RFC5226]. The registry has a maximum value of 255. | defined in [RFC5226]. The registry has a maximum value of 255. | |||
| Initial registrations are as follows: | Initial registrations are as follows: | |||
| 0 Reserved [RFC7432] | 0 Reserved [RFC7432] | |||
| 1 Ethernet Auto-discovery [RFC7432] | 1 Ethernet Auto-discovery [RFC7432] | |||
| 2 MAC/IP Advertisement [RFC7432] | 2 MAC/IP Advertisement [RFC7432] | |||
| 3 Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag [RFC7432] | 3 Inclusive Multicast Ethernet Tag [RFC7432] | |||
| End of changes. 40 change blocks. | ||||
| 150 lines changed or deleted | 171 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||