rfc8881.original.xml   rfc8881.xml 
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629-xhtml.ent">
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="std" docName="draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-04" number="8881" obsoletes="5661" ipr="pre5378Trust200902" updates="" submissionType="IETF" consensus="true" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" tocDepth="2" symRefs="false" sortRefs="false" version="3">
<!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 2.41.0 -->
<front>
<title abbrev="NFSv4.1 with Namespace Update ">
Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol
</title>
<seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8881"/>
<author fullname="David Noveck" initials="D." surname="Noveck" role="editor">
<organization abbrev="NetApp">NetApp</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>1601 Trapelo Road, Suite 16</street>
<city>Waltham</city>
<region>MA</region>
<code>02451</code>
<country>United States of America</country>
</postal>
<phone>+1-781-768-5347</phone>
<email>dnoveck@netapp.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author initials="C." surname="Lever" fullname="Charles Lever">
<organization abbrev="ORACLE">
Oracle Corporation
</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>1015 Granger Avenue</street>
<city>Ann Arbor</city>
<region>MI</region>
<code>48104</code>
<country>United States of America</country>
</postal>
<phone>+1-248-614-5091</phone>
<email>chuck.lever@oracle.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<date month="July" year="2020"/>
<area>Transport</area>
<workgroup>NFSv4</workgroup>
<keyword>example</keyword>
<abstract>
<t>
This document describes the Network File System (NFS) version 4
minor version 1,
including features retained from the base protocol (NFS version 4 minor
version 0, which is specified in RFC 7530) and protocol
extensions made subsequently. The later minor version
has no dependencies on NFS version 4 minor version 0, and
is considered a separate protocol.
</t>
<t>
This document obsoletes RFC 5661. It substantially revises the treatment
of features relating to multi-server namespace, superseding the
description of those features appearing in RFC 5661.
</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<middle>
<section anchor="intro" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Introduction</name>
<section anchor="intro_the_document" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Introduction to This Update</name>
<t>
Two important features previously defined in minor version 0 but
never fully addressed in minor version 1 are trunking, which is the
simultaneous use of
multiple connections between a client and server, potentially to
different network addresses, and Transparent State Migration, which
allows a file system to be transferred between servers in a way that
provides to the client the ability to maintain its existing locking
state across the transfer.
</t>
<t>
The revised description of the NFS version 4 minor version 1
(NFSv4.1) protocol presented in this update is necessary to enable
full use of these features together with other multi-server namespace
features. This document is in the form of an updated description of
the NFSv4.1 protocol previously defined in RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>.
RFC 5661 is obsoleted by this document. However, the update has a
limited scope and is focused on enabling full use of trunking and
Transparent State Migration. The need for these changes is discussed
in <xref target="NEED"/>. <xref target="CHG"/> describes the specific changes made to
arrive at the current text.
</t>
<t>
This limited-scope update replaces the current NFSv4.1 RFC with the
intention of providing an authoritative and complete specification, the
motivation for which is discussed in
<xref target="I-D.roach-bis-documents" format="default"/>,
addressing the issues within the scope of the update. However, it will
not address issues that are known but outside of this limited scope
as could be expected by a full update of the protocol. Below are some
areas that are known to need addressing in a future update of the
protocol:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Work needs to be done with regard to RFC 8178
<xref target="RFC8178" format="default"/>, which establishes NFSv4-wide
versioning rules. As
RFC 5661 is currently inconsistent with
that document, changes are needed in order
to arrive at a situation in which there
would be no need for RFC 8178 to update the NFSv4.1 specification.
</li>
<li>
Work needs to be done with regard to RFC 8434
<xref target="RFC8434" format="default"/>, which establishes the requirements
for parallel NFS (pNFS) layout types, which are not clearly defined in
RFC 5661. When that
work is done and the resulting documents approved,
the new NFSv4.1 specification document will provide a clear set
of requirements for layout types and a description of the file layout
type that conforms to those requirements. Other layout types will
have their own specification documents that conform to those
requirements as well.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Work needs to be done to address many errata reports relevant to
RFC 5661, other than errata report 2006 <xref target="Err2006" format="default"/>,
which is addressed in this document.
Addressing that report was not deferrable because of the
interaction of the changes suggested there
and the newly described handling of state and session migration.
</t>
<t>
The errata reports that have been deferred and that will need to
be addressed in a later document include reports currently assigned
a range of statuses in the errata reporting system, including reports
marked Accepted and those marked Hold For Document Update
because the change was
too minor to address immediately.
</t>
<t>
In addition, there is a set of other reports, including at least one
in state Rejected, that will need to be addressed in a later document.
This will involve making changes to consensus decisions reflected
in RFC 5661, in situations in which the working group has decided that
the treatment in RFC 5661 is incorrect and needs to be revised to
reflect the working group's new consensus and to ensure compatibility
with existing implementations that do not follow the handling
described in RFC 5661.
</t>
<t>
Note that it is expected that all such errata reports will remain
relevant to implementors and the authors of an eventual rfc5661bis,
despite the fact that this document, when approved,
will obsolete RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>.
</t>
</li>
<li>
There is a need for a new approach to the description of
internationalization since the current internationalization section
(<xref target="internationalization" format="default"/>) has never been
implemented and does
not meet the needs of the NFSv4 protocol. Possible solutions are
to create a new internationalization section modeled on that in
<xref target="RFC7530" format="default"/> or to create a new document describing
internationalization for all
NFSv4 minor versions and reference that document in the RFCs
defining both NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1.
</li>
<li>
There is a need for a revised treatment of security
in NFSv4.1. The issues with the existing treatment are discussed in
<xref target="SECBAD" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Until the above work is done, there will not be a consistent set of
documents that provides a description of the NFSv4.1 protocol, and any
full description would involve documents updating other documents
within the specification. The updates applied by
RFC 8434 <xref target="RFC8434" format="default"/> and RFC 8178
<xref target="RFC8178" format="default"/>
to RFC 5661 also apply to this specification, and will apply to
any subsequent v4.1 specification until that work is done.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="intro_the_protocol" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The NFS Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol</name>
<t>
The NFS version 4 minor version 1 (NFSv4.1) protocol
is the second minor version of the NFS version 4
(NFSv4) protocol. The first minor version, NFSv4.0, is
now described in RFC 7530 <xref target="RFC7530" format="default"/>. It generally
follows the guidelines for minor versioning that are
listed in Section <xref target="RFC3530" sectionFormat="bare" section="10"/>
of RFC 3530 <xref target="RFC3530" format="default"/>. However, it
diverges from guidelines 11 ("a client and server
that support minor version X must support minor
versions 0 through X-1") and 12 ("no new features may be
introduced as mandatory in a minor version"). These
divergences are due to the introduction of
the sessions model for managing non-idempotent
operations and the RECLAIM_COMPLETE operation.
These two new features are infrastructural in
nature and simplify implementation of existing and
other new features. Making them anything but <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>
would add undue complexity to protocol definition and
implementation. NFSv4.1 accordingly updates the
<xref target="minor_versioning" format="default">minor versioning
guidelines</xref>.
</t>
<t>
As a minor version, NFSv4.1 is consistent with the overall
goals for NFSv4, but extends the protocol so as to
better meet those goals, based on experiences with NFSv4.0.
In addition, NFSv4.1 has adopted some additional goals, which
motivate some of the major extensions in NFSv4.1.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Requirements Language</name>
<t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and
"<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
RFC 2119 <xref target="RFC2119"/>.</t>
</section>
<section anchor="scope_of_doc" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Scope of This Document</name>
<t>
This document describes the NFSv4.1 protocol. With
respect to NFSv4.0, this document does not:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
describe the NFSv4.0 protocol, except where needed
to contrast with NFSv4.1.
</li>
<li>
modify the specification of the NFSv4.0 protocol.
</li>
<li>
clarify the NFSv4.0 protocol.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="version4_goals" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4 Goals</name>
<t>
The NFSv4 protocol is a further revision of the NFS protocol
defined already by NFSv3
<xref target="RFC1813" format="default"/>. It retains
the essential characteristics of previous versions: easy
recovery; independence of transport protocols, operating systems, and
file systems; simplicity; and good performance. NFSv4 has the following goals:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Improved access and good performance on the Internet
</t>
<t>
The protocol is designed to transit firewalls easily, perform well
where latency is high and bandwidth is low, and scale to very
large numbers of clients per server.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Strong security with negotiation built into the protocol
</t>
<t>
The protocol builds on the work of the ONCRPC working group in
supporting the RPCSEC_GSS protocol. Additionally, the
NFSv4.1 protocol provides a mechanism to allow clients and
servers the ability to negotiate security and require clients and servers to
support a minimal set of security schemes.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Good cross-platform interoperability
</t>
<t>
The protocol features a file system model that provides a useful,
common set of features that does not unduly favor one file system
or operating system over another.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Designed for protocol extensions
</t>
<t>
The protocol is designed to accept standard extensions within a
framework that enables and encourages backward compatibility.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="minor_version1_goals" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4.1 Goals</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 has the following goals, within the framework
established by the overall NFSv4 goals.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
To correct significant structural weaknesses and oversights
discovered in the base protocol.
</li>
<li>
To add clarity and specificity to areas left
unaddressed or not addressed in sufficient
detail in the base protocol. However, as stated
in <xref target="scope_of_doc" format="default"/>, it is not
a goal to clarify the NFSv4.0 protocol in the
NFSv4.1 specification.
</li>
<li>
To add specific features based on experience with the existing
protocol and recent industry developments.
</li>
<li>
To provide protocol support to take advantage of clustered
server deployments including the ability to provide scalable
parallel access to files distributed among multiple servers.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="intro_definitions" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>General Definitions</name>
<t>
The following definitions provide an appropriate context for the reader.
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>Byte:</dt>
<dd anchor="byte">
In this document, a byte is an octet, i.e., a datum
exactly 8 bits in length.
</dd>
<dt>Client:</dt>
<dd anchor="client_def">
<t>
The client is the entity that accesses the NFS server's
resources. The client may be an application that contains
the logic to access the NFS server directly. The client
may also be the traditional operating system client that
provides remote file system services for a set of applications.
</t>
<t>
A client is uniquely identified by a client owner.
</t>
<t>
With reference to byte-range locking, the client is also the entity that
maintains a set of locks on behalf of one or more
applications. This client is responsible for crash or
failure recovery for those locks it manages.
</t>
<t>
Note that multiple clients may share the same transport and
connection and
multiple clients may exist on the same network node.
</t>
</dd>
<dt>Client ID:</dt>
<dd>
The client ID is a 64-bit quantity used as a unique, short-hand reference to
a client-supplied verifier and client owner. The server is
responsible for supplying the client ID.
</dd>
<dt>Client Owner:</dt>
<dd>
The client owner is a unique string, opaque to the server,
that identifies a client. Multiple network connections and source
network addresses originating from those connections may share
a client owner. The server is expected to treat requests
from connections with the same client owner as coming from
the same client.
</dd>
<dt>File System:</dt>
<dd>
The file system is the collection of objects on a server (as
identified by the major identifier of a server
owner, which is defined later in this section)
that share the same fsid attribute (see <xref target="attrdef_fsid" format="default"/>).
</dd>
<dt>Lease:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
A lease is an interval of time defined by the server for which the
client is irrevocably granted locks. At the end of a
lease period, locks may be revoked if the lease has not
been extended. A lock must be revoked if a conflicting
lock has been granted after the lease interval.
</t>
<t>
A server grants a client a single lease for all state.
</t>
</dd>
<dt>Lock:</dt>
<dd>
The term "lock" is used to refer to byte-range (in UNIX environments,
also known as record)
locks, share reservations, delegations, or layouts unless
specifically stated otherwise.
</dd>
<dt>Secret State Verifier (SSV):</dt>
<dd>
The SSV is a unique secret key shared between a client and
server. The SSV serves as the secret key for an internal (that
is, internal to NFSv4.1) Generic Security Services (GSS)
mechanism (the SSV GSS mechanism;
see <xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>). The SSV GSS mechanism uses the
SSV to compute message integrity code (MIC) and Wrap tokens.
See <xref target="protect_state_change" format="default"/> for more details on how NFSv4.1 uses
the SSV and the SSV GSS mechanism.
</dd>
<dt>Server:</dt>
<dd>
The Server is the entity responsible for coordinating
client access to a set of file systems and is identified by a server
owner. A server can span multiple network addresses.
</dd>
<dt>Server Owner:</dt>
<dd>
The server owner identifies the server to the client.
The server owner consists of a major identifier and a minor identifier.
When the client has two connections each to a peer with the
same major identifier, the client assumes that both peers are
the same server (the server namespace is the
same via each connection) and that
lock state is shareable across both connections. When each peer
has both the same major and minor identifiers, the client
assumes that each connection might be associable with the same session.
</dd>
<dt>Stable Storage:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
Stable storage is storage from which data stored by
an NFSv4.1 server can be recovered without data
loss from multiple power failures (including cascading
power failures, that is, several power failures in quick
succession), operating system failures, and/or hardware
failure of components other than the storage medium itself
(such as disk, nonvolatile RAM, flash memory, etc.).
</t>
<t>
Some examples of stable storage that are allowable for an
NFS server include:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Media commit of data; that is, the modified data has
been successfully written to the disk media, for
example, the disk platter.
</li>
<li>
An immediate reply disk drive with battery-backed,
on-drive intermediate storage or uninterruptible power
system (UPS).
</li>
<li>
Server commit of data with battery-backed intermediate
storage and recovery software.
</li>
<li>
Cache commit with uninterruptible power system (UPS) and
recovery software.
</li>
</ol>
</dd>
<dt>Stateid:</dt>
<dd>
A stateid is a 128-bit quantity returned by a server that uniquely
defines the open and locking states provided by the server
for a specific open-owner or lock-owner/open-owner pair
for a specific file and type of lock.
</dd>
<dt>Verifier:</dt>
<dd>
A verifier is a 64-bit quantity generated by the client that the server
can use to determine if the client has restarted and lost
all previous lock state.
</dd>
</dl>
</section>
<section anchor="feature-overview" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Overview of NFSv4.1 Features</name>
<t>
The major features of
the NFSv4.1 protocol will be reviewed in brief. This will be done
to provide an appropriate context for both the reader who is familiar
with the previous versions of the NFS protocol and the reader
who is new to the NFS protocols. For the reader new to the NFS protocols,
there is still a set of fundamental knowledge that is expected.
The reader should be familiar with the External Data
Representation (XDR) and Remote Procedure Call (RPC) protocols
as described in <xref target="RFC4506" format="default"/> and <xref target="RFC5531" format="default"/>.
A basic knowledge of file systems and distributed file systems is expected as well.
</t>
<t>
In general, this specification of NFSv4.1 will
not distinguish those features added in minor version
1 from those present in the base protocol but
will treat NFSv4.1 as a unified whole. See <xref target="intro_differences" format="default"/> for a summary of
the differences between NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.1.
</t>
<section anchor="rpc_and_security" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>RPC and Security</name>
<t>
As with previous versions of NFS, the External Data Representation
(XDR) and Remote Procedure Call (RPC) mechanisms used for the NFSv4.1 protocol are those defined in
<xref target="RFC4506" format="default"/> and <xref target="RFC5531" format="default"/>. To
meet end-to-end security requirements, the RPCSEC_GSS framework
<xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/> is used to extend the basic
RPC security. With the
use of RPCSEC_GSS, various mechanisms can be provided to offer
authentication, integrity, and privacy to the NFSv4 protocol.
Kerberos V5 is used as described in
<xref target="RFC4121" format="default"/> to provide one
security framework.
With the use of
RPCSEC_GSS, other mechanisms may also be specified and used for NFSv4.1 security.
</t>
<t>
To enable in-band security negotiation, the NFSv4.1 protocol
has operations that provide the client a method of
querying the server about its policies regarding which security
mechanisms must be used for access to the server's file system
resources. With this, the client can securely match the security
mechanism that meets the policies specified at both the client and
server.
</t>
<t>
NFSv4.1 introduces parallel access (see <xref target="parallel_access" format="default"/>), which is
called pNFS.
The security framework
described in this section is
significantly modified by the
introduction of pNFS (see <xref target="security_considerations_pnfs" format="default"/>),
because data access is sometimes not over
RPC. The level of significance varies
with the storage protocol (see <xref target="storage_protocol" format="default"/>) and can be as low as zero
impact (see <xref target="file_security_considerations" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="protocol_structure" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Protocol Structure</name>
<section anchor="core_protocol" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Core Protocol</name>
<t>
Unlike NFSv3, which used a series of ancillary
protocols (e.g., NLM, NSM (Network Status Monitor), MOUNT), within all minor versions
of NFSv4 a single RPC protocol is used to make requests to
the server.
Facilities that had been separate protocols, such
as locking, are now integrated within a single unified
protocol.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="parallel_access" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Parallel Access</name>
<t>
Minor version 1 supports high-performance data access to a
clustered server implementation by enabling a separation of
metadata access and data access, with the latter done to
multiple servers in parallel.
</t>
<t>
Such parallel data access is controlled by recallable
objects known as "layouts", which are integrated into the
protocol locking model. Clients direct requests for
data access to a set of data servers specified by the
layout via a data
storage protocol which may be NFSv4.1 or may be another
protocol.
</t>
<t>
Because the protocols used for parallel
data access are not necessarily
RPC-based, the RPC-based security model
(<xref target="rpc_and_security" format="default"/>) is
obviously impacted (see <xref target="security_considerations_pnfs" format="default"/>).
The degree of impact varies with the
storage protocol (see <xref target="storage_protocol" format="default"/>) used for
data access, and can be as low as zero (see
<xref target="file_security_considerations" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="file_system_model" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Model</name>
<t>
The general file system
model used for the NFSv4.1 protocol
is the same as previous versions. The server file system is
hierarchical with the regular files contained within being
treated as opaque byte
streams. In a slight departure, file and directory names are encoded
with UTF-8 to deal with the basics of internationalization.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol does not require a separate
protocol to provide for the initial mapping between path
name and filehandle. All file systems exported by a server
are presented as a tree so that all file systems are reachable
from a special per-server global root filehandle. This
allows LOOKUP operations to be used to perform functions
previously provided by the MOUNT protocol. The server
provides any necessary pseudo file systems to bridge any
gaps that arise due to unexported gaps between exported
file systems.
</t>
<section anchor="intro_filehandles" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Filehandles</name>
<t>
As in previous versions of the NFS protocol, opaque
filehandles are used to identify individual files
and directories. Lookup-type and create operations
translate file and directory names to
filehandles, which are then used to identify objects
in subsequent operations.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol provides support for
persistent filehandles, guaranteed to be valid
for the lifetime of the file system object designated.
In addition, it provides support to servers to provide
filehandles with more limited validity guarantees,
called volatile filehandles.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="intro_attributes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File Attributes</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol has a rich and extensible
file object attribute structure, which is divided
into <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>, <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, and named attributes
(see <xref target="file_attributes" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
Several (but not all) of the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attributes
are derived from the attributes of NFSv3 (see
the definition of the fattr3 data type in <xref target="RFC1813" format="default"/>). An example of a <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>
attribute is the file object's type (<xref target="attrdef_type" format="default"/>) so that regular files
can be distinguished from directories (also known
as folders in some operating environments) and
other types of objects. <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attributes are
discussed in <xref target="mandatory_attributes_intro" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
An example of three <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes are
acl, sacl, and dacl. These attributes define an
Access Control List (ACL) on a file object
(<xref target="acl" format="default"/>). An ACL provides
directory and file access control beyond the
model used in NFSv3. The ACL definition allows
for specification of specific sets of permissions
for individual users and groups. In addition,
ACL inheritance allows propagation of access
permissions and restrictions down a directory tree
as file system objects are created. <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>
attributes are discussed in <xref target="recommended_attributes_intro" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
A named attribute is an opaque byte stream that is associated
with a directory or file and referred to by a string name.
Named attributes are meant to be used by client applications
as a method to associate application-specific data with a
regular file or directory. NFSv4.1 modifies named attributes
relative to NFSv4.0 by tightening the allowed operations in
order to prevent the development of non-interoperable
implementations. Named attributes are discussed in <xref target="named_attributes_intro" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="PREP-intro" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Multi-Server Namespace</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 contains a number of features to allow
implementation of namespaces that cross server boundaries
and that allow and facilitate a nondisruptive transfer of
support for individual file systems between servers. They
are all based upon attributes that allow one file system to
specify alternate, additional, and new location information
that specifies how the client may access
that file system.
</t>
<t>
These attributes can be used to provide for individual active
file systems:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Alternate network addresses to access the
current file system instance.
</li>
<li>
The locations of alternate file system instances
or replicas to be used in the event that the current
file system instance becomes unavailable.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
These file system location
attributes may be used together with the concept
of absent file systems, in which a position in the server
namespace is associated with locations on other servers without
there being any corresponding file system instance on the
current server. For example,
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
These attributes may be used with absent file systems
to implement referrals whereby one server may direct the
client to a file system provided by another server. This
allows extensive multi-server namespaces to be constructed.
</li>
<li>
These attributes may be provided when a previously
present file system becomes absent. This allows
nondisruptive migration of file systems to alternate
servers.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="intro_locking" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Locking Facilities</name>
<t>
As mentioned previously, NFSv4.1 is a single protocol that
includes locking facilities. These locking facilities
include support for many types of locks including a number
of sorts of recallable locks. Recallable locks such as
delegations allow the client to be assured that certain
events will not occur so long as that lock is held. When
circumstances change, the lock is recalled
via a callback request. The assurances provided by
delegations allow more extensive caching to be done safely
when circumstances allow it.
</t>
<t>
The types of locks are:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Share reservations as established by OPEN operations.
</li>
<li>
Byte-range locks.
</li>
<li>
File delegations, which are recallable locks that assure
the holder that inconsistent opens and file changes cannot
occur so long as the delegation is held.
</li>
<li>
Directory delegations, which are recallable locks
that assure the holder that inconsistent directory
modifications cannot occur so long as the delegation
is held.
</li>
<li>
Layouts, which are recallable objects that assure the
holder that direct access to the file data may be
performed directly by the client and that no change
to the data's location that is inconsistent with that access
may be made so long as the layout is held.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
All locks for a given client are tied together under a
single client-wide lease. All requests made on sessions
associated with the client renew that lease. When the client's
lease
is not promptly renewed, the client's locks are subject to revocation.
In the event of server restart, clients have the
opportunity to safely reclaim their locks within a special
grace period.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="intro_differences" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Differences from NFSv4.0</name>
<t>
The following summarizes the major differences between minor version
1 and the base protocol:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Implementation of the sessions model (<xref target="Session" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Parallel access to data (<xref target="pnfs" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Addition of the RECLAIM_COMPLETE operation to better structure
the lock reclamation process (<xref target="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
<t>
Enhanced delegation support as follows.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Delegations on directories and other
file types in addition to regular files (<xref target="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION" format="default"/>, <xref target="OP_WANT_DELEGATION" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Operations to optimize acquisition of recalled
or denied delegations (<xref target="OP_WANT_DELEGATION" format="default"/>, <xref target="OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG" format="default"/>, <xref target="OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Notifications of changes to files and directories
(<xref target="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION" format="default"/>, <xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
A method to allow a server to indicate that it is
recalling one or more delegations for resource
management reasons, and thus a method to allow
the client to pick which delegations to return
(<xref target="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY" format="default"/>).
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Attributes can be set atomically
during exclusive file create via the OPEN operation
(see the new EXCLUSIVE4_1 creation method in
<xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Open files can be preserved if removed and the
hard link count ("hard link" is defined in
an <xref target="hardlink" format="default">Open Group</xref> standard) goes
to zero, thus obviating the
need for clients to rename deleted files to
partially hidden names -- colloquially called
"silly rename" (see the new
OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED reply flag in
<xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Improved compatibility with Microsoft Windows for
Access Control Lists (<xref target="attrdef_sacl" format="default"/>, <xref target="attrdef_dacl" format="default"/>, <xref target="auto_inherit" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Data retention (<xref target="retention" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Identification of the implementation of the NFS client
and server (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
Support for notification of the availability of
byte-range locks (see the new
OPEN4_RESULT_MAY_NOTIFY_LOCK reply flag in <xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/> and see <xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
In NFSv4.1, LIPKEY and SPKM-3 are not required security mechanisms
<xref target="RFC2847" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="Core_Infrastructure" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Core Infrastructure</name>
<section anchor="Introduction" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Introduction</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 relies on core infrastructure common to nearly
every operation. This core infrastructure is described in the remainder
of this section.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Introduction -->
<section anchor="RPC_and_XDR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>RPC and XDR</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol is a Remote Procedure Call (RPC)
application that uses RPC version 2 and the corresponding eXternal
Data Representation (XDR) as defined in
<xref target="RFC5531" format="default"/> and
<xref target="RFC4506" format="default"/>.
</t>
<section anchor="RPC-based_Security" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>RPC-Based Security</name>
<t>
Previous NFS versions have been thought of as having a
host-based authentication model, where the NFS server
authenticates the NFS client, and trusts the client
to authenticate all users.
Actually, NFS has always depended on RPC for
authentication. One of the first forms of RPC authentication,
AUTH_SYS, had no strong authentication and
required a host-based authentication
approach. NFSv4.1 also depends on RPC for basic security
services and mandates RPC support for a user-based
authentication model. The user-based authentication
model has user principals authenticated by a server, and
in turn the server authenticated by user principals.
RPC provides some basic security services that are used
by NFSv4.1.
</t>
<section anchor="RPC_Security_Flavors" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>RPC Security Flavors</name>
<t>
As described in "Authentication", <xref target="RFC5531" sectionFormat="of" section="7"/>,
RPC security is encapsulated in the RPC header, via a
security or authentication flavor, and information
specific to the specified security flavor.
Every RPC header conveys information used to identify
and authenticate a client and server. As discussed in
<xref target="RPCSEC_GSS_and_Security_Services" format="default"/>,
some security flavors provide additional security
services.
</t>
<t>
NFSv4.1 clients and servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> implement RPCSEC_GSS.
(This requirement to implement is not a requirement to
use.) Other flavors, such as AUTH_NONE and
AUTH_SYS, <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be implemented as well.
</t>
<section anchor="RPCSEC_GSS_and_Security_Services" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>RPCSEC_GSS and Security Services</name>
<t>
RPCSEC_GSS <xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/> uses the
functionality of GSS-API <xref target="RFC2743" format="default"/>. This allows for the
use of various security mechanisms by the RPC layer
without the additional implementation overhead of
adding RPC security flavors.
</t>
<section anchor="Authentication_Integrity_Privacy" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Identification, Authentication, Integrity, Privacy</name>
<t>
Via the GSS-API, RPCSEC_GSS can be used to identify and authenticate
users on clients to servers, and servers to users. It can also
perform integrity checking on the entire RPC message, including
the RPC header, and on the arguments or results. Finally, privacy,
usually via encryption, is a service available with RPCSEC_GSS.
Privacy is performed on the arguments and results. Note that
if privacy is selected, integrity, authentication, and identification
are enabled.
If privacy is not selected, but integrity is selected, authentication
and identification are enabled. If integrity and privacy are not
selected, but authentication is enabled,
identification is enabled. RPCSEC_GSS does not provide identification as
a separate service.
</t>
<t>
Although GSS-API has an authentication service distinct from its
privacy and integrity services, GSS-API's
authentication service is not used for RPCSEC_GSS's authentication
service. Instead, each RPC request and response header is
integrity protected with the GSS-API integrity service, and
this allows RPCSEC_GSS to offer per-RPC authentication and
identity. See <xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/> for more information.
</t>
<t>
NFSv4.1 client and servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support RPCSEC_GSS's integrity and authentication
service. NFSv4.1 servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support RPCSEC_GSS's privacy service.
NFSv4.1 clients <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support RPCSEC_GSS's privacy service.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Identity, Authentication, Integrity, Privacy -->
<section anchor="security_mechs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Mechanisms for NFSv4.1</name>
<t>
RPCSEC_GSS, via GSS-API, normalizes access to mechanisms that
provide security services. Therefore, NFSv4.1 clients and servers
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the Kerberos V5 security mechanism.
</t>
<t>
The use of RPCSEC_GSS requires selection of mechanism,
quality of protection (QOP), and service (authentication,
integrity, privacy). For the mandated security mechanisms,
NFSv4.1 specifies that a QOP of zero is used, leaving it up
to the mechanism or the mechanism's configuration to map
QOP zero to
an appropriate level of protection.
Each mandated mechanism specifies a minimum set of cryptographic
algorithms for implementing integrity and privacy. NFSv4.1
clients and servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be implemented on operating environments
that comply with the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> cryptographic algorithms
of each <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> mechanism.
</t>
<section anchor="kerberosv5" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Kerberos V5</name>
<t>
The Kerberos V5 GSS-API mechanism as described in
<xref target="RFC4121" format="default"/> <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be implemented with
the RPCSEC_GSS services as specified in the following
table:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
column descriptions:
1 == number of pseudo flavor
2 == name of pseudo flavor
3 == mechanism's OID
4 == RPCSEC_GSS service
5 == NFSv4.1 clients MUST support
6 == NFSv4.1 servers MUST support
1 2 3 4 5 6
------------------------------------------------------------------
390003 krb5 1.2.840.113554.1.2.2 rpc_gss_svc_none yes yes
390004 krb5i 1.2.840.113554.1.2.2 rpc_gss_svc_integrity yes yes
390005 krb5p 1.2.840.113554.1.2.2 rpc_gss_svc_privacy no yes
]]></artwork>
<t>
Note that the number and name of the pseudo flavor
are presented here as a mapping aid to the implementor.
Because the NFSv4.1 protocol includes a method to negotiate
security and it understands the GSS-API mechanism, the pseudo flavor
is not needed. The pseudo flavor is needed for the NFSv3 since the security negotiation is done via
the MOUNT protocol as described in <xref target="RFC2623" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
At the time NFSv4.1 was specified, the Advanced Encryption
Standard (AES) with HMAC-SHA1 was
a <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> algorithm set for Kerberos V5. In contrast, when
NFSv4.0 was specified, weaker algorithm sets were <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> for
Kerberos V5, and were <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> in the NFSv4.0 specification, because
the Kerberos V5 specification at the time did not specify stronger
algorithms.
The NFSv4.1 specification does not specify <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> algorithms
for Kerberos V5, and instead, the implementor is expected
to track the evolution of the Kerberos V5 standard if and when
stronger algorithms are specified.
</t>
<section anchor="krb5_sec_consider" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Considerations for Cryptographic Algorithms in Kerberos V5</name>
<t>
When deploying NFSv4.1, the strength of the security achieved depends
on the existing Kerberos V5 infrastructure. The algorithms
of Kerberos V5 are not directly exposed to or selectable by the
client or server, so there is some due diligence required by
the user of NFSv4.1 to ensure that security is acceptable
where needed.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Kerberos V5 -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Security mechanisms for NFSv4.1 -->
<section anchor="GSS_Server_Principal" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>GSS Server Principal</name>
<t>
Regardless of what security mechanism under RPCSEC_GSS
is being used, the NFS server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> identify itself
in GSS-API via a GSS_C_NT_HOSTBASED_SERVICE name type.
GSS_C_NT_HOSTBASED_SERVICE names are of the form:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
service@hostname
]]></artwork>
<t>
For NFS, the "service" element is
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
nfs
]]></artwork>
<t>
Implementations of security mechanisms will convert
nfs@hostname to various different forms. For Kerberos
V5, the following form is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
nfs/hostname
]]></artwork>
</section>
<!-- [auth] GSS Server Principal -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] RPCSEC_GSS and Security Services -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] RPC Security Flavors -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] RPC-based Security -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] RPC and XDR -->
<section anchor="COMPOUND_and_CB_COMPOUND" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND</name>
<t>
A significant departure from the versions of the NFS
protocol before NFSv4 is the introduction of the
COMPOUND procedure. For the NFSv4 protocol,
in all minor versions, there are exactly two RPC procedures,
NULL and COMPOUND. The COMPOUND procedure is defined
as a series of individual operations and these operations
perform the sorts of functions performed by traditional
NFS procedures.
</t>
<t>
The operations combined within a COMPOUND
request are evaluated in order by the server, without
any atomicity guarantees. A limited set of facilities
exist to pass results from one operation to another. Once an
operation returns a failing result, the evaluation ends
and the results of all
evaluated operations are returned to the client.
</t>
<t>
With the use of the COMPOUND procedure, the client is able to build
simple or complex requests. These COMPOUND requests allow for a
reduction in the number of RPCs needed for logical file system
operations. For example, multi-component look up requests can
be constructed by combining multiple LOOKUP operations. Those
can be further combined with operations such as GETATTR, READDIR,
or OPEN plus READ to do more complicated sets of operation without
incurring additional latency.
</t>
<t>
NFSv4.1 also contains a considerable set of
callback operations in which the server makes an RPC
directed at the client. Callback RPCs have a similar
structure to that of the normal server requests.
In all minor versions of the NFSv4 protocol,
there are two callback RPC procedures:
CB_NULL and CB_COMPOUND. The CB_COMPOUND procedure is defined
in an analogous fashion to that of COMPOUND
with its own set of callback operations.
</t>
<t>
The addition of new server and callback operations within the
COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND request
framework provides a means of extending the protocol in
subsequent minor versions.
</t>
<t>
Except for a small number of operations needed for session
creation, server requests and callback requests are performed
within the context of a session. Sessions provide a client
context for every request and support robust replay
protection for non-idempotent requests.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND -->
<section anchor="Client_Identifiers" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Identifiers and Client Owners</name>
<t>
For each operation that obtains or depends on locking state, the
specific client needs to be identifiable by the server.
</t>
<t>
Each distinct client instance is represented
by a client ID. A client ID is a 64-bit identifier
representing a specific client at a given time.
The client ID is changed whenever the client re-initializes,
and may change when the server re-initializes.
Client IDs are used to support lock identification
and crash recovery.
</t>
<t>
During steady state operation,
the client ID associated with each operation
is derived from the session (see <xref target="Session" format="default"/>) on which the operation is sent. A session is associated with
a client ID when the session is created.
</t>
<t>
Unlike NFSv4.0, the only NFSv4.1 operations possible before a
client ID is established are those needed to
establish the client ID.
</t>
<t>
A sequence of an EXCHANGE_ID operation followed by a
CREATE_SESSION operation using that client ID
(eir_clientid as returned from EXCHANGE_ID)
is required to establish and confirm the
client ID on the server. Establishment of identification by a
new incarnation of the client also has the effect of immediately
releasing any locking state that a previous incarnation of that
same client might have had on the server. Such released state
would include all byte-range lock, share reservation, layout state, and -- where the server supports neither the CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV nor CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH claim types -- all delegation state associated with the same client with the same
identity. For discussion of delegation state recovery, see
<xref target="delegation_recovery" format="default"/>. For discussion of layout state
recovery, see <xref target="pnfs_client_recovery" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Releasing such state requires that the server be able to determine
that one client instance is the successor of another. Where this
cannot be done, for any of a number of reasons, the locking state
will remain for a time subject to lease expiration
(see <xref target="lease_renewal" format="default"/>)
and the new client will need to wait for
such state to be removed, if it makes conflicting lock requests.
</t>
<t>
Client identification is encapsulated in the following client owner
data type:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct client_owner4 {
verifier4 co_verifier;
opaque co_ownerid<NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The first field, co_verifier, is a client incarnation
verifier, allowing the server to distinguish successive incarnations
(e.g., reboots) of the same client. The server will start the process of
canceling the client's leased state if co_verifier
is different than what the server has previously
recorded for the identified client (as specified in
the co_ownerid field).
</t>
<t>
The second field, co_ownerid, is a variable length string that uniquely defines
the client so that subsequent instances of the same client bear the
same co_ownerid with a different verifier.
</t>
<t>
There are several considerations for how the client
generates the co_ownerid string:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The string should be unique so that multiple clients
do not present the same string. The consequences of
two clients presenting the same string range from
one client getting an error to one client having its
leased state abruptly and unexpectedly cancelled.
</li>
<li>
The string should be selected so that subsequent incarnations
(e.g., restarts) of the same client cause the client to present
the same string. The implementor
is cautioned from an approach that requires the string to
be recorded in a local file because this precludes the use
of the implementation in an environment where there is no local
disk and all file access is from an NFSv4.1 server.
</li>
<li>
The string should be the same for each server network address that
the client accesses.
This way, if a server has multiple interfaces, the client
can trunk traffic over multiple network paths
as described in <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>.
(Note: the precise opposite was advised in the NFSv4.0
specification <xref target="RFC3530" format="default"/>.)
</li>
<li>
The algorithm for generating the string should not
assume that the client's network address will not
change, unless the client implementation knows it
is using statically assigned network addresses.
This includes changes between client incarnations
and even changes while the client is still running
in its current incarnation. Thus, with dynamic
address assignment, if the
client includes just the client's network address
in the co_ownerid string, there is a real risk
that after the
client gives up the network address, another
client, using a similar algorithm for generating
the co_ownerid string, would generate a conflicting
co_ownerid string.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Given the above considerations, an example of a well-generated co_ownerid
string is one that includes:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If applicable, the client's statically assigned network address.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Additional information that tends to be unique, such as one or more
of:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The client machine's serial number (for privacy reasons, it is best
to perform some one-way function on the serial number).
</li>
<li>
A Media Access Control (MAC) address (again, a one-way function should be performed).
</li>
<li>
The timestamp of when the NFSv4.1 software was first installed
on the client (though this is subject to the previously mentioned
caution about using information that is stored in a file, because the
file might only be accessible over NFSv4.1).
</li>
<li>
A true random number. However, since this number ought to be the same
between client incarnations, this shares the same problem as that of
using the timestamp of the software installation.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
For a user-level NFSv4.1 client, it should contain additional
information to distinguish the client from other user-level clients
running on the same host, such as a process identifier or other unique
sequence.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The client ID is assigned by the server (the eir_clientid result from EXCHANGE_ID)
and should be chosen so that it will not
conflict with a client ID previously assigned by the
server. This applies across server restarts.
</t>
<t>
In the event of a server restart, a client may find
out that its current client ID is no longer valid when
it receives an NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID error. The precise
circumstances depend on the characteristics of the
sessions involved, specifically whether the session is
persistent (see <xref target="Persistence" format="default"/>), but in
each case the client will receive this error when it attempts
to establish a new session with the existing client ID and
receives the error NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID, indicating that a new
client ID needs to be obtained via EXCHANGE_ID and the new session
established with that client ID.
</t>
<t>
When a session is not persistent, the client will find out that
it needs to create a new session as a result of getting an
NFS4ERR_BADSESSION, since the session in question was lost
as part of a server restart. When the existing client ID is
presented to a server as part of creating a session
and that client ID is not recognized, as would happen after a server
restart, the server will reject the request with the error
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID.
</t>
<t>
In the case of the session being persistent, the
client will re-establish communication using the
existing session after the restart. This session
will be associated with the existing client ID but
may only be used to retransmit operations that the
client previously transmitted and did not see replies
to. Replies to operations that the server previously performed
will come from the reply cache; otherwise,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION will be returned.
Hence, such a session is referred to as "dead". In this situation,
in order to perform new operations, the client needs to
establish a new session. If an attempt is made to
establish this new session with the existing client ID,
the server will reject the request with
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID.
</t>
<t>
When NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID is received in either of
these situations, the client needs to obtain a
new client ID by use of the EXCHANGE_ID operation, then
use that client ID as the basis of a new session, and
then proceed to
any other necessary recovery for the server restart case (see
<xref target="server_failure" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
See the descriptions of EXCHANGE_ID
(<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) and CREATE_SESSION
(<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>) for a complete
specification of these operations.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Upgrade from NFSv4.0 to NFSv4.1</name>
<t>
To facilitate upgrade from NFSv4.0 to NFSv4.1, a server
may compare a value of data type client_owner4 in an EXCHANGE_ID with a
value of data type nfs_client_id4 that was established using the SETCLIENTID operation of
NFSv4.0. A server that does so will allow
an upgraded client to avoid waiting
until the lease (i.e., the lease established by the NFSv4.0 instance
client) expires.
This requires that the value of data type client_owner4 be constructed
the same way as the value of data type nfs_client_id4. If the latter's
contents included the server's network address (per the
recommendations of the NFSv4.0 specification <xref target="RFC3530" format="default"/>), and
the NFSv4.1 client does not wish to use a client
ID that prevents trunking, it should send two
EXCHANGE_ID operations. The first EXCHANGE_ID will
have a client_owner4 equal to the nfs_client_id4.
This will clear the state created by the NFSv4.0
client. The second EXCHANGE_ID will not have the
server's network address. The state created for the
second EXCHANGE_ID will not have to wait for lease
expiration, because there will be no state to expire.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Release of Client ID</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 introduces a new operation called
DESTROY_CLIENTID (<xref target="OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID" format="default"/>),
which the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> use to destroy a client ID it
no longer needs. This permits graceful, bilateral release of
a client ID. The operation cannot be used if there are sessions
associated with the client ID, or state with an unexpired lease.
</t>
<t>
If the server determines that the client holds no associated state
for its client ID (associated state includes unrevoked sessions,
opens, locks, delegations, layouts, and wants), the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
choose to unilaterally release the client ID in order to
conserve resources.
If the client
contacts the server after this release, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ensure that the client receives the appropriate error
so that it will use the EXCHANGE_ID/CREATE_SESSION
sequence to establish a new client ID.
The server ought to be very hesitant to
release a client ID since the resulting work on the
client to recover from such an event will be the same
burden as if the server had failed and restarted.
Typically, a server would not release a client ID
unless there had been no activity from that client
for many minutes. As long as there are sessions,
opens, locks, delegations, layouts, or wants, the
server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> release the client ID. See <xref target="loss_of_session" format="default"/> for discussion on
releasing inactive sessions.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Server Release of Client ID -->
<section anchor="cowner_conflicts" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Resolving Client Owner Conflicts</name>
<t>
When the server gets an EXCHANGE_ID for a client owner that
currently has no state, or that has state but the lease has expired,
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> allow the
EXCHANGE_ID and confirm the new client ID if followed by the
appropriate CREATE_SESSION.
</t>
<t>
When the server gets an EXCHANGE_ID for a
new incarnation of a client owner that
currently has an old incarnation with state and an unexpired lease, the
server is allowed to dispose of the state of the
previous incarnation of the client owner if
one of the following is true:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The principal that created the client ID for the client owner
is the same as the principal that is sending the EXCHANGE_ID operation.
Note that if the client ID was created with
SP4_MACH_CRED state protection (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>),
the principal <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be based on RPCSEC_GSS authentication,
the RPCSEC_GSS service used <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be integrity or
privacy, and the
same GSS mechanism and principal
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used as that used when the client ID
was created.
</li>
<li>
The client ID was established with SP4_SSV
protection (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>,
<xref target="protect_state_change" format="default"/>)
and the client sends the EXCHANGE_ID with the
security flavor set to RPCSEC_GSS using the GSS
SSV mechanism (<xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
The client ID was established with SP4_SSV
protection, and under the conditions described herein,
the EXCHANGE_ID was sent with SP4_MACH_CRED state protection.
Because the SSV might not persist
across client and server restart, and because
the first time a client sends EXCHANGE_ID to
a server it does not have an SSV, the client
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> send the subsequent EXCHANGE_ID without
an SSV RPCSEC_GSS handle. Instead, as with
SP4_MACH_CRED protection, the principal <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
based on RPCSEC_GSS authentication, the RPCSEC_GSS
service used <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be integrity or privacy, and the
same GSS mechanism and principal <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used as
that used when the client ID was created.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If none of the above situations apply, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE.
</t>
<t>
If the server accepts the principal and co_ownerid
as matching that which created the client ID, and
the co_verifier in the EXCHANGE_ID differs from the
co_verifier used when the client ID was created,
then after the server receives a CREATE_SESSION that
confirms the client ID, the server deletes state.
If the co_verifier values are the same (e.g., the
client either is updating properties of the client ID
(<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) or
is attempting trunking (<xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>),
the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> delete state.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Handling Client Owner Conflicts -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Client Identifiers -->
<section anchor="Server_Owners" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Owners</name>
<t>
The server owner is similar to a client owner
(<xref target="Client_Identifiers" format="default"/>), but unlike the
client owner, there is no shorthand server ID.
The server owner is defined in the following data type:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct server_owner4 {
uint64_t so_minor_id;
opaque so_major_id<NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The server owner is returned from
EXCHANGE_ID. When the so_major_id fields are the same in
two EXCHANGE_ID results, the connections that each EXCHANGE_ID
were sent over can be assumed to address the same server
(as defined in <xref target="intro_definitions" format="default"/>). If
the so_minor_id fields are also the same, then not only
do both connections connect to the same server, but the
session can be shared across both
connections. The reader is cautioned that multiple
servers may deliberately or accidentally claim to have
the same so_major_id or so_major_id/so_minor_id; the
reader should examine Sections <xref target="Trunking" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="counter"/> in order to avoid
acting on falsely matching server owner values.
</t>
<t>
The considerations for generating an so_major_id are
similar to that for generating a co_ownerid string (see
<xref target="Client_Identifiers" format="default"/>). The consequences
of two servers generating conflicting so_major_id values
are less dire than they are for co_ownerid conflicts
because the client can use RPCSEC_GSS to compare the
authenticity of each server
(see <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Server Owners -->
<section anchor="Security_Service_Negotiation" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Service Negotiation</name>
<t>
With the NFSv4.1 server potentially offering
multiple security mechanisms, the client needs a method
to determine or negotiate which mechanism is to be
used for its communication with the server. The NFS
server may have multiple points within its file system
namespace that are available for use by NFS clients.
These points can be considered security policy boundaries,
and, in some NFS implementations, are tied to NFS export points.
In turn, the NFS server may be configured such that each
of these security policy boundaries may have different or multiple
security mechanisms in use.
</t>
<t>
The security negotiation between client and server
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be done with a secure channel to eliminate
the possibility of a third party intercepting the
negotiation sequence and forcing the client and server
to choose a lower level of security than required or
desired. See
<xref target="SECCON" format="default"/> for further discussion.
</t>
<section anchor="NFSv4_Security_Tuples" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4.1 Security Tuples</name>
<t>
An NFS server can assign one or more "security tuples" to each
security policy boundary in its namespace. Each security tuple
consists of a security flavor
(see <xref target="RPC_Security_Flavors" format="default"/>) and, if the flavor
is RPCSEC_GSS, a GSS-API mechanism Object Identifier (OID), a GSS-API quality of
protection, and an RPCSEC_GSS service.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] NFSv4.1 Security Tuples -->
<section anchor="SECINFO_and_SECINFO_NO_NAME" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME</name>
<t>
The SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME operations allow the client to
determine, on a per-filehandle basis, what security tuple is to be
used for server access. In general, the client will not have to
use either operation except during initial communication with the
server or when the client crosses security policy boundaries at the
server. However, the server's policies may also change at any time
and force the client to negotiate a new security tuple.
</t>
<t>
Where the use of different security tuples would affect the type of
access that would be allowed if a request was sent over the same
connection used for the SECINFO or SECINFO_NO_NAME operation
(e.g., read-only vs. read-write) access, security tuples that allow
greater access should be presented first. Where the general level
of access is the same and different security flavors limit the
range of principals whose privileges are recognized (e.g., allowing
or disallowing root access), flavors supporting the greatest range
of principals should be listed first.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME -->
<section anchor="Security_Error" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Error</name>
<t>
Based on the assumption that each NFSv4.1 client
and server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support a minimum set of security (i.e.,
Kerberos V5 under RPCSEC_GSS),
the NFS client will initiate file access to the server
with one of the minimal security tuples. During
communication with the server, the client may receive an
NFS error of NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. This error allows the
server to notify the client that the security tuple
currently being used contravenes the server's
security policy. The client is then responsible for
determining (see <xref target="using_secinfo" format="default"/>) what
security tuples are available at the server and choosing
one that is appropriate for the client.
</t>
<section anchor="using_secinfo" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Using NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC, SECINFO, and SECINFO_NO_NAME</name>
<t>
This section explains the mechanics of NFSv4.1 security negotiation.
</t>
<section anchor="putfh_series" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Put Filehandle Operations</name>
<t>
The term "put filehandle operation" refers to
PUTROOTFH, PUTPUBFH, PUTFH, and RESTOREFH. Each of the subsections
herein describes how the server handles a subseries of operations
that starts with a put filehandle operation.
</t>
<section anchor="PUTFHplusSAVEFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Put Filehandle Operation + SAVEFH</name>
<t>
The client is saving a filehandle for a future
RESTOREFH, LINK, or RENAME. SAVEFH <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. To determine whether or not the put
filehandle operation returns NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC,
the server implementation pretends SAVEFH is not in
the series of operations and examines which of the
situations described in the other subsections of <xref target="putfh_series" format="default"/> apply.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Put Filehandle Operation + SAVEFH -->
<section anchor="PUTFHplusPUTFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Two or More Put Filehandle Operations</name>
<t>
For a series of N put filehandle operations, the server
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC to the first N-1 put
filehandle operations.
The Nth put filehandle operation
is handled as if it is the first in a subseries of
operations.
For example, if the
server received a COMPOUND request with this series of
operations -- PUTFH, PUTROOTFH, LOOKUP -- then the
PUTFH operation is ignored for NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC purposes, and the
PUTROOTFH, LOOKUP subseries is processed as according
to <xref target="PUTFHplusLOOKUP" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] PUTFH + PUTFH -->
<section anchor="PUTFHplusLOOKUP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Put Filehandle Operation + LOOKUP (or OPEN of an Existing Name)</name>
<t>
This situation also applies to a put filehandle operation followed
by a LOOKUP or an OPEN operation that specifies an existing component name.
</t>
<t>
In this situation, the client is potentially crossing
a security policy boundary, and the set of security tuples
the parent directory supports may differ from those of
the child.
The server implementation may decide whether to impose
any restrictions on security policy administration.
There are at least three approaches (sec_policy_child is
the tuple set of the child export, sec_policy_parent is
that of the parent).
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="(%c)">
<li>
sec_policy_child &lt;= sec_policy_parent (&lt;= for subset). This
means that the set of security tuples specified on the
security policy of a child directory is always a subset
of its parent directory.
</li>
<li>
sec_policy_child ^ sec_policy_parent != {} (^ for intersection, {}
for the empty set). This means that the set of security tuples specified
on the security policy of a child directory always has a non-empty intersection
with that of the parent.
</li>
<li>
sec_policy_child ^ sec_policy_parent == {}. This means that the
set of security tuples specified on the security policy of a child directory
may not intersect with that of the parent. In other words, there
are no restrictions on how the system administrator may
set up these tuples.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
In order for a server to support approaches (b)
(for the case when a client chooses a flavor that is
not a member of sec_policy_parent) and (c), the put
filehandle operation cannot return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
when there is a security tuple mismatch. Instead,
it should be returned from the LOOKUP (or OPEN by
existing component name) that follows.
</t>
<t>
Since the above guideline does not contradict approach
(a), it should be followed in general. Even if approach
(a) is implemented, it is possible for the security
tuple used to be acceptable for the target of LOOKUP
but not for the filehandles used in the put filehandle operation. The
put filehandle operation
could be a PUTROOTFH or PUTPUBFH, where the
client cannot know the security tuples for the root
or public filehandle. Or the security policy for the
filehandle used by the put filehandle operation
could have changed since the
time the filehandle was obtained.
</t>
<t>
Therefore, an NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
in response to the put filehandle operation
if the operation
is immediately followed by a LOOKUP or an OPEN by component name.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] PUTFH + LOOKUP -->
<section anchor="PUTFHplusLOOKUPP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Put Filehandle Operation + LOOKUPP</name>
<t>
Since SECINFO only works its way down, there is no way LOOKUPP can
return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC without SECINFO_NO_NAME. SECINFO_NO_NAME
solves this issue via style
SECINFO_STYLE4_PARENT, which works in the opposite direction as SECINFO.
As with <xref target="PUTFHplusLOOKUP" format="default"/>, a put filehandle operation
that is followed by a LOOKUPP
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC.
If the server does not support SECINFO_NO_NAME, the client's
only recourse is to send the put filehandle operation,
LOOKUPP, GETFH sequence
of operations with every security tuple it supports.
</t>
<t>
Regardless of whether SECINFO_NO_NAME is supported, an
NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC in
response to a put filehandle operation if the
operation is immediately followed by a LOOKUPP.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] PUTFH + LOOKUPP -->
<section anchor="PUTFHplusSECINFO" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Put Filehandle Operation + SECINFO/SECINFO_NO_NAME</name>
<t>
A security-sensitive client is allowed to choose
a strong security tuple when querying a server to
determine a file object's permitted security tuples.
The security tuple chosen by the client does not have
to be included in the tuple list of the security policy
of either the parent directory indicated in the put filehandle
operation or the child file object indicated in SECINFO (or any parent directory
indicated in SECINFO_NO_NAME). Of course, the server has to be
configured for whatever security
tuple the client selects; otherwise, the request will
fail at the RPC layer with an appropriate authentication error.
</t>
<t>
In theory, there is no connection between the security
flavor used by SECINFO or SECINFO_NO_NAME and those
supported by the security policy. But in practice, the
client may start looking for strong flavors from those
supported by the security policy, followed by those in
the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> set.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC to a
put filehandle operation that
is immediately followed by SECINFO or SECINFO_NO_NAME.
The NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC from SECINFO or
SECINFO_NO_NAME.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] PUTFH + SECINFO -->
<section anchor="PUTFHplusNothing" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Put Filehandle Operation + Nothing</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] PUTFH + Nothing -->
<section anchor="PUTFHplusAnythingElse" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Put Filehandle Operation + Anything Else</name>
<t>
"Anything Else" includes OPEN by filehandle.
</t>
<t>
The security policy enforcement applies to the
filehandle specified in the put filehandle operation. Therefore, the
put filehandle operation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC when there is a security tuple
mismatch. This avoids the complexity of
adding NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC as an allowable error to every
other operation.
</t>
<t>
A COMPOUND containing the series put filehandle
operation + SECINFO_NO_NAME (style SECINFO_STYLE4_CURRENT_FH) is an
efficient way for the client to recover from
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC to
any operation other than a put filehandle operation,
LOOKUP, LOOKUPP, and OPEN (by component name).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] PUTFH + Anything Else -->
<section anchor="aftersecinfo" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operations after SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME</name>
<t>
Suppose a client sends a COMPOUND procedure
containing the series SEQUENCE, PUTFH,
SECINFO_NONAME, READ, and suppose the security tuple
used does not match that required for the target
file. By rule (see <xref target="PUTFHplusSECINFO" format="default"/>),
neither PUTFH nor SECINFO_NO_NAME can
return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. By rule (see <xref target="PUTFHplusAnythingElse" format="default"/>), READ cannot return
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. The issue is resolved by the fact
that SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME consume the current
filehandle (note that this is a change from NFSv4.0). This leaves no current filehandle for
READ to use, and READ returns NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Operations after SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME" -->
</section>
<section anchor="link_rename" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>LINK and RENAME</name>
<t>
The LINK and RENAME operations use both the current
and saved filehandles.
Technically, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC from
LINK or RENAME
if the security policy of the
saved filehandle rejects the security flavor used in the
COMPOUND request's credentials. If the server does so,
then if there is no intersection between the security
policies of saved and current filehandles, this means that it
will be impossible for the client to perform the intended
LINK or RENAME operation.
</t>
<t>
For example, suppose the client sends this COMPOUND
request: SEQUENCE, PUTFH bFH, SAVEFH, PUTFH aFH,
RENAME "c" "d", where filehandles bFH and aFH refer
to different directories. Suppose no common security
tuple exists between the security policies of aFH and
bFH. If the client sends the request using credentials
acceptable to bFH's security policy but not aFH's
policy, then the PUTFH aFH operation will fail with
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. After a SECINFO_NO_NAME request,
the client sends SEQUENCE, PUTFH bFH, SAVEFH, PUTFH
aFH, RENAME "c" "d", using credentials acceptable to
aFH's security policy but not bFH's policy. The server
returns NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC on the RENAME operation.
</t>
<t>
To prevent a client from an endless sequence of a
request containing LINK or RENAME, followed by a request
containing SECINFO_NO_NAME or SECINFO, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> detect
when the security policies of the current and saved
filehandles have no mutually acceptable security tuple,
and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC from LINK or RENAME
in that situation. Instead
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> do one of two things:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The server can return NFS4ERR_XDEV.
</li>
<li>
The server can
allow the security policy of the current filehandle to
override that of the saved filehandle, and so return NFS4_OK.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Using NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC, SECINFO, and SECINFO_NO_NAME -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Security Error -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Security Service Negotiation -->
<section anchor="minor_versioning" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Minor Versioning</name>
<t>
To address the requirement of an NFS protocol that can evolve as the
need arises, the NFSv4.1 protocol contains the rules and
framework to allow for future minor changes or versioning.
</t>
<t>
The base assumption with respect to minor versioning is that any
future accepted minor version will be
documented in one or more Standards Track RFCs.
Minor version 0 of the NFSv4 protocol is represented by
<xref target="RFC3530" format="default"/>, and minor version 1 is represented by
this RFC.
The COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND
procedures support the encoding of the minor version
being requested by the client.
</t>
<t>
The following items represent the basic rules for the development of
minor versions. Note that a future minor version may modify
or add to the following rules as part of the minor version definition.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
<t>
Procedures are not added or deleted.
</t>
<t>
To maintain the general RPC model, NFSv4 minor versions will
not add to or delete procedures from the NFS program.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Minor versions may add operations to the COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND
procedures.
</t>
<t>
The addition of operations to the COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND procedures
does not affect the RPC model.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Minor versions may append attributes to the bitmap4 that represents
sets of attributes and to the fattr4 that represents sets of attribute
values.
</t>
<t>
This allows for the expansion of the attribute model to allow for
future growth or adaptation.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Minor version X must append any new attributes after the last
documented attribute.
</t>
<t>
Since attribute results are specified as an opaque array of
per-attribute, XDR-encoded results, the complexity of adding new
attributes in the midst of the current definitions would be too
burdensome.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Minor versions must not modify the structure of an existing
operation's arguments or results.
</t>
<t>
Again, the complexity of handling multiple structure definitions for a
single operation is too burdensome. New operations should be added
instead of modifying existing structures for a minor version.
</t>
<t>
This rule does not preclude the following adaptations in a minor version:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
adding bits to flag fields, such as new attributes to GETATTR's bitmap4
data type, and providing corresponding variants of opaque arrays,
such as a notify4 used together with such bitmaps
</li>
<li>
adding bits to existing attributes like ACLs that have flag words
</li>
<li>
extending enumerated types (including NFS4ERR_*) with new values
</li>
<li>
adding cases to a switched union
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Minor versions must not modify the structure of existing attributes.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Minor versions must not delete operations.
</t>
<t>
This prevents the potential reuse of a particular operation "slot" in
a future minor version.
</t>
</li>
<li>
Minor versions must not delete attributes.
</li>
<li>
Minor versions must not delete flag bits or enumeration values.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Minor versions may declare an operation <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be implemented.
</t>
<t>
Specifying that an operation <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be implemented is equivalent
to obsoleting an operation. For the client, it means that the
operation <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be sent to the server. For the server, an NFS
error can be returned as opposed to "dropping" the request as an XDR
decode error. This approach allows for the obsolescence of an
operation while maintaining its structure so that a future minor version can reintroduce the operation.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Minor versions may declare that an attribute <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be implemented.
</li>
<li>
Minor versions may declare that a flag bit or enumeration value <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
be implemented.
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
Minor versions may downgrade features from <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> to <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>,
or <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>.
</li>
<li>
Minor versions may upgrade features from <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> to <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, or
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>.
</li>
<li>
A client and server that support minor version X <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support minor
versions zero through X-1 as well.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Except for infrastructural changes, a minor version must not
introduce <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> new features.
</t>
<t>
This rule allows for the introduction of new functionality and forces
the use of implementation experience before designating a feature as
<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>. On the other hand, some classes of features are
infrastructural and have broad effects. Allowing infrastructural features
to be <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> or <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> complicates implementation of the minor version.
</t>
</li>
<li>
A client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> attempt to use a stateid, filehandle, or similar
returned object from the COMPOUND procedure with minor version X for
another COMPOUND procedure with minor version Y, where X != Y.
</li>
</ol>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Minor Versioning -->
<section anchor="Non-RPC-based_Security_Services" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Non-RPC-Based Security Services</name>
<t>
As described in <xref target="Authentication_Integrity_Privacy" format="default"/>,
NFSv4.1 relies on RPC for identification,
authentication, integrity, and privacy. NFSv4.1 itself
provides or enables additional security services as described in the
next several subsections.
</t>
<section anchor="Authorization" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Authorization</name>
<t>
Authorization to access a file object via an NFSv4.1
operation is ultimately determined by the NFSv4.1
server. A client can predetermine its access to a file
object via the OPEN (<xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/>)
and the ACCESS (<xref target="OP_ACCESS" format="default"/>)
operations.
</t>
<t>
Principals with appropriate access rights can modify the
authorization on a file object via the SETATTR
(<xref target="OP_SETATTR" format="default"/>) operation. Attributes that affect
access rights include mode, owner, owner_group, acl, dacl, and
sacl. See <xref target="file_attributes" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Authorization -->
<section anchor="Auditing" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Auditing</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 provides auditing on a per-file object basis, via the acl
and sacl attributes as described in <xref target="acl" format="default"/>. It is
outside the scope of this specification to specify audit log
formats or management policies.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Auditing -->
<section anchor="Intrusion_Detection" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Intrusion Detection</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 provides alarm control on a per-file object basis, via the
acl and sacl attributes as described in <xref target="acl" format="default"/>.
Alarms may serve as the basis for intrusion detection. It is
outside the scope of this specification to specify heuristics for
detecting intrusion via alarms.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Intrusion Detection -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Non-RPC-based Security Services -->
<section anchor="Transport_Layers" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Transport Layers</name>
<section anchor="Required_and_Recommended_Transport_Attributes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name><bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> and <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> Properties of Transports</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 works over Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) and non-RDMA-based transports with
the following attributes:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The transport supports reliable delivery of data, which
NFSv4.1 requires but neither NFSv4.1 nor RPC has facilities
for ensuring <xref target="Chet" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
The transport delivers data in the order it was sent.
Ordered delivery simplifies detection of transmit
errors, and simplifies the sending of arbitrary sized
requests and responses via the record marking
protocol <xref target="RFC5531" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Where an NFSv4.1 implementation supports operation
over the IP network protocol, any transport used between
NFS and IP <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be among the IETF-approved congestion
control transport protocols. At the time this document
was written, the only two transports that had the above
attributes were TCP and the Stream
Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP). To enhance the
possibilities for interoperability, an NFSv4.1
implementation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support operation over the TCP
transport protocol.
</t>
<t>
Even if NFSv4.1 is used over a non-IP network
protocol, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that the transport support
congestion control.
</t>
<t>
It is permissible for a connectionless transport to
be used under NFSv4.1; however, reliable and in-order
delivery of data combined with congestion control
by the connectionless transport is
<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>. As a consequence, UDP by itself <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used
as an NFSv4.1 transport. NFSv4.1 assumes that a client transport
address and server transport address used to send data
over a transport together constitute a connection,
even if the underlying transport eschews the concept
of a connection.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Required and Recommended Transport Attributes -->
<section anchor="Client_and_Server_Transport_Behavior" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client and Server Transport Behavior</name>
<t>
If a connection-oriented transport (e.g., TCP) is used,
the client and server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> use long-lived connections
for at least three reasons:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
This will prevent the weakening of the transport's
congestion control mechanisms via short-lived
connections.
</li>
<li>
This will improve performance for the WAN environment
by eliminating the need for connection setup
handshakes.
</li>
<li>
The NFSv4.1 callback model differs from NFSv4.0, and
requires the client and server to maintain a
client-created backchannel (see <xref target="conn_chann_assoc" format="default"/>) for the server to use.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
In order to reduce congestion, if a connection-oriented
transport is used, and the request is not the NULL
procedure:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
A requester <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> retry a request unless the connection the request
was sent over was lost before the reply was
received.
</li>
<li>
A replier <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> silently drop a request, even if the request is a
retry. (The silent drop behavior of RPCSEC_GSS
<xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/> does not apply
because this behavior happens at the RPCSEC_GSS layer,
a lower layer in the request processing.) Instead, the
replier <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return an appropriate error (see
<xref target="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" format="default"/>),
or it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> disconnect the connection.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When sending a reply, the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send the reply
to the same full network address (e.g., if using an
IP-based transport, the source port of the requester
is part of the full network address) from which the requester
sent the request. If using a connection-oriented
transport, replies <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be sent on the same connection from which
the request was received.
</t>
<t>
If a connection is dropped after the replier receives
the request but before the replier sends the reply, the
replier might have a pending reply.
If a connection is established with the same
source and destination full network address as the
dropped connection, then the replier <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> send
the reply until the requester retries the request. The
reason for this prohibition is that the requester <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
retry a request over a different connection (provided that connection
is associated with the original request's session).
</t>
<t>
When using RDMA transports, there are other reasons for not
tolerating retries over the same connection:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
RDMA transports use "credits" to enforce flow control, where
a credit is a right to a peer to transmit a message.
If one peer were to retransmit a request (or reply), it would
consume an additional credit.
If the replier
retransmitted a reply, it would certainly result in an RDMA
connection loss, since the requester would typically only post a
single receive buffer for each request. If the requester
retransmitted a request, the additional credit consumed on the
server might lead to RDMA connection failure unless the client
accounted for it and decreased its available credit, leading to
wasted resources.
</li>
<li>
RDMA credits present a new issue to the reply cache in
NFSv4.1. The reply cache may be used when a connection within a
session is lost, such as after the client reconnects. Credit
information is a dynamic property of the RDMA connection, and stale
values must not be replayed from the cache. This implies that the
reply cache contents must not be blindly used when replies are
sent from it, and credit information appropriate to the channel
must be refreshed by the RPC layer.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In addition, as described in
<xref target="Retry_and_Replay" format="default"/>, while a session is active,
the NFSv4.1 requester <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> stop waiting for a reply.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Client and Server Transport Behavior -->
<section anchor="Ports" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Ports</name>
<t>
Historically, NFSv3 servers have listened over
TCP port 2049. The registered port 2049 <xref target="RFC3232" format="default"/>
for the NFS protocol should be the default configuration. NFSv4.1
clients <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> use the RPC binding protocols as described in
<xref target="RFC1833" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Ports -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Transport Layers -->
<section anchor="Session" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Session</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 clients and servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the session
feature as described in this section.
</t>
<section anchor="Motivation_and_Overview" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Motivation and Overview</name>
<t>
Previous versions and minor versions of NFS have suffered from
the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Lack of support for Exactly Once Semantics (EOS). This includes
lack of support for EOS through server failure and recovery.
</li>
<li>
Limited callback support, including no support for sending callbacks
through firewalls, and races between replies to normal requests
and callbacks.
</li>
<li>
Limited trunking over multiple network paths.
</li>
<li>
Requiring machine credentials for fully secure operation.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Through the introduction of a session, NFSv4.1 addresses the
above shortfalls with practical solutions:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
EOS is enabled by a reply cache with a bounded size,
making it feasible to keep the cache in persistent storage and enable
EOS through server failure and recovery. One reason that
previous revisions of NFS did not support EOS was
because some EOS approaches often limited parallelism.
As will be explained in
<xref target="Exactly_Once_Semantics" format="default"/>,
NFSv4.1 supports both EOS and unlimited parallelism.
</li>
<li>
The NFSv4.1 client (defined in <xref target="client_def" format="default"/>) creates transport
connections and provides them to the server to use for sending
callback requests, thus solving the firewall issue
(<xref target="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION" format="default"/>). Races between
responses from client requests and callbacks caused by
the requests are detected via the session's sequencing
properties that are a consequence of EOS
(<xref target="sessions_callback_races" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
The NFSv4.1 client can associate an arbitrary number of connections with
the session, and thus provide trunking (<xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
The NFSv4.1 client and server produce a session key independent of client
and server machine credentials which can be
used to compute a digest for protecting critical session management operations
(<xref target="protect_state_change" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
The NFSv4.1 client can also create secure RPCSEC_GSS contexts
for use by the session's backchannel that do not require
the server to authenticate to a client machine principal
(<xref target="Backchannel_RPC_Security" format="default"/>).
</li>
</ul>
<t>
A session is a dynamically created, long-lived server object
created by a client and used over time from one or more transport
connections. Its function is to maintain the server's state
relative to the connection(s) belonging to a client instance. This
state is entirely independent of the connection itself, and indeed
the state exists whether or not the connection exists. A client may
have one or more sessions associated with it so that
client-associated state may be accessed using any of the sessions
associated with that client's client ID, when connections are
associated with those sessions. When no connections are associated
with any of a client ID's sessions for an extended time, such
objects as locks, opens, delegations, layouts, etc. are subject to
expiration. The session serves as an object representing a means
of access by a client to the associated client state on the server,
independent of the physical means of access to that state.
</t>
<t>
A single client may create multiple sessions. A single session <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> serve multiple clients.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Motivation and Overview -->
<section anchor="NFSv4_Integration" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4 Integration</name>
<t>
Sessions are part of NFSv4.1 and not NFSv4.0. Normally, a major
infrastructure change such as sessions would require a new major
version number to an Open Network Computing (ONC) RPC program like
NFS. However, because NFSv4 encapsulates its functionality in a single procedure, COMPOUND,
and because COMPOUND can support an arbitrary number of
operations, sessions have been added to NFSv4.1 with little difficulty. COMPOUND includes
a minor version number field, and for NFSv4.1 this minor version
is set to 1. When the NFSv4 server processes a COMPOUND with
the minor version set to 1, it expects a different set of
operations than it does for NFSv4.0. NFSv4.1 defines the
SEQUENCE operation, which is required for every
COMPOUND that operates over an established session, with the
exception of some session administration operations, such
as DESTROY_SESSION (<xref target="OP_DESTROY_SESSION" format="default"/>).
</t>
<section anchor="SEQUENCE_and_CB_SEQUENCE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>SEQUENCE and CB_SEQUENCE</name>
<t>
In NFSv4.1, when the SEQUENCE operation is present, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
the first operation in the COMPOUND procedure. The primary purpose
of SEQUENCE is to carry the session identifier. The session identifier
associates all other operations in the COMPOUND procedure with
a particular session. SEQUENCE also contains required information
for maintaining EOS (see <xref target="Exactly_Once_Semantics" format="default"/>).
Session-enabled NFSv4.1 COMPOUND requests thus have the form:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
+-----+--------------+-----------+------------+-----------+----
| tag | minorversion | numops |SEQUENCE op | op + args | ...
| | (== 1) | (limited) | + args | |
+-----+--------------+-----------+------------+-----------+----
]]></artwork>
<t>
and the replies have the form:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
+------------+-----+--------+-------------------------------+--//
|last status | tag | numres |status + SEQUENCE op + results | //
+------------+-----+--------+-------------------------------+--//
//-----------------------+----
// status + op + results | ...
//-----------------------+----
]]></artwork>
<t>
A CB_COMPOUND procedure request and reply has a similar form to
COMPOUND, but
instead of a SEQUENCE operation, there is a CB_SEQUENCE operation.
CB_COMPOUND also has an additional field called "callback_ident", which
is superfluous in NFSv4.1 and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by
the client. CB_SEQUENCE has the same information
as SEQUENCE, and also includes other information needed to resolve
callback races
(<xref target="sessions_callback_races" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] SEQUENCE and CB_SEQUENCE -->
<section anchor="Client_ID_and_Session_Association" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client ID and Session Association</name>
<t>
Each client ID (<xref target="Client_Identifiers" format="default"/>) can have
zero or more active sessions. A client ID and associated
session are required to perform file access in
NFSv4.1. Each time a session is used (whether by a client sending
a request to the server or the client replying to a callback
request from the server), the state leased to its associated
client ID is automatically renewed.
</t>
<t>
State (which can consist of share reservations, locks, delegations,
and layouts (<xref target="intro_locking" format="default"/>)) is tied to
the client ID. Client state is not tied to any individual session.
Successive state changing operations from a given state
owner <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> go over different sessions, provided the
session is associated with the same client ID. A callback
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> arrive over a different session than that of the request
that originally acquired the state pertaining to the
callback. For example, if session A is used to
acquire a delegation, a request to recall the
delegation <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> arrive over session B if both sessions are
associated with the same client ID. Sections
<xref target="Session_Callback_Security" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="Backchannel_RPC_Security" format="counter"/> discuss
the security considerations around callbacks.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Client ID and Session Association -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] NFSv4 Integration -->
<section anchor="Channels" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Channels</name>
<t>
A channel is not a connection. A channel represents the
direction ONC RPC requests are sent.
</t>
<t>
Each session has one or two channels: the fore channel and the backchannel.
Because there are at most two channels per session, and because each
channel has a distinct purpose, channels are not assigned
identifiers.
</t>
<t>
The fore channel is
used for ordinary requests from the client to the server, and
carries COMPOUND requests and responses.
A session always has a fore channel.
</t>
<t>
The backchannel is used for callback requests from server
to client, and carries CB_COMPOUND requests and responses.
Whether or not there is a backchannel is decided by the
client; however, many features of NFSv4.1 require a backchannel.
NFSv4.1 servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support backchannels.
</t>
<t>
Each session has resources for each channel,
including separate reply caches (see
<xref target="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" format="default"/>).
Note that even the backchannel requires a reply cache (or, at least,
a slot table in order to detect retries) because
some callback operations are non-idempotent.
</t>
<section anchor="conn_chann_assoc" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Association of Connections, Channels, and Sessions</name>
<t>
Each channel is associated with zero or more transport
connections (whether of the same transport protocol or different
transport protocols). A connection can be associated with
one channel or both channels of a session; the client
and server negotiate whether a connection will carry
traffic for one channel or both channels via the
CREATE_SESSION (<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>) and the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION (<xref target="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION" format="default"/>) operations. When a
session is created via CREATE_SESSION, the connection
that transported the CREATE_SESSION request is
automatically associated with the fore channel, and
optionally the backchannel. If the client specifies no
state protection (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>)
when the session is created, then when SEQUENCE is
transmitted on a different connection, the connection
is automatically associated with the fore channel of
the session specified in the SEQUENCE operation.
</t>
<t>
A connection's association with a session is
not exclusive. A connection associated with the channel(s)
of one session may be simultaneously
associated with the channel(s) of other sessions including
sessions associated with other client IDs.
</t>
<t>
It is permissible for connections of multiple transport
types to be associated with the same channel. For
example, both TCP and RDMA connections can be
associated with the fore channel. In the event an
RDMA and non-RDMA connection are associated with the
same channel, the maximum number of slots <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be
at least one more than the total number of RDMA credits
(<xref target="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" format="default"/>).
This way, if all RDMA credits are used, the non-RDMA
connection can have at least one outstanding request.
If a server supports multiple transport types, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
allow a client to associate connections from each transport
to a channel.
</t>
<t>
It is permissible for a connection of one type of
transport to be associated with the fore channel,
and a connection of a different type to be associated
with the backchannel.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Channels -->
<section anchor="Server_Scope" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Scope</name>
<t>
Servers each specify a server scope value in the form
of an opaque string eir_server_scope returned as part of
the results of an EXCHANGE_ID operation. The purpose of
the server scope is to allow a group of servers to
indicate to clients that a set of servers sharing the
same server scope value has arranged to use distinct
values of opaque identifiers so that the two servers never
assign the same value to two distinct objects. Thus, the identifiers
generated by two servers within that set can be assumed compatible
so that, in certain important cases,
identifiers generated by one server in that set may be
presented to
another server of the same scope.
</t>
<t>
The use of such compatible values does not imply that
a value generated by one server will always be accepted
by another. In most cases, it will not. However, a
server will not inadvertently accept a value generated by another
server. When it does accept it, it will be because
it is recognized as valid and carrying the same meaning
as on another server of the same scope.
</t>
<t>
When servers are of the same server scope, this compatibility
of values applies to the following identifiers:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Filehandle values. A filehandle value accepted by two
servers of the same server scope denotes the same object.
A WRITE operation sent to one server is reflected immediately
in a READ sent to the other.
</li>
<li>
Server owner values. When the server scope values are
the same, server owner value may be validly compared.
In cases where the server scope values are different, server
owner values are treated as different even if they
contain identical strings of bytes.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The coordination among servers required to provide such
compatibility can be quite minimal, and limited to a simple
partition of the ID space. The recognition of common values
requires additional implementation, but this can be tailored
to the specific situations in which that recognition is
desired.
</t>
<t>
Clients will have occasion to compare the server scope values
of multiple servers under a number of circumstances, each of
which will be discussed under the appropriate functional
section:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When server owner values received in response to
EXCHANGE_ID operations sent to multiple network
addresses are compared for the purpose of determining
the validity of various forms of trunking, as described
in <xref target="SEC11-USES-trunk" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
When network or server reconfiguration causes the same
network address to possibly be directed to different
servers, with the necessity for the client to determine
when lock reclaim should be attempted, as described
in <xref target="reclaim_locks" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When two replies from EXCHANGE_ID, each from two different
server network addresses, have the same server scope, there
are a number of ways a client can validate that the common
server scope is due to two servers cooperating in a group.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If both EXCHANGE_ID requests were sent with RPCSEC_GSS
(<xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/>, <xref target="RFC5403" format="default"/>,
<xref target="RFC7861" format="default"/>)
authentication and the server principal is the same for
both targets, the equality of server scope is validated.
It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that two servers intending to share the
same server scope and server_owner major_id also share the
same principal name. In some cases, this
simplifies the client's task of validating server scope.
</li>
<li>
The client may accept the appearance of the second
server in the fs_locations or fs_locations_info attribute
for a relevant file system. For example, if there is
a migration event for a particular file system
or there are locks to be reclaimed on a particular file
system, the attributes for that particular file system
may be used. The client sends the GETATTR request to
the first server for the fs_locations or
fs_locations_info attribute with RPCSEC_GSS
authentication. It may need to do this in advance
of the need to verify the common server scope.
If the client successfully authenticates the reply
to GETATTR, and the GETATTR request and reply containing
the fs_locations or fs_locations_info attribute refers
to the second server, then the equality of server scope
is supported. A client may choose to limit the use of
this form of support to information relevant to the
specific file system involved (e.g. a file system
being migrated).
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="Trunking" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Trunking</name>
<t>
Trunking is the use of multiple connections between a
client and server in order to increase the speed of data
transfer. NFSv4.1 supports two types of trunking:
session trunking and client ID trunking.
</t>
<t>
In the context of a single server network address, it
can be assumed that all connections are accessing the
same server, and NFSv4.1
servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support both forms of trunking. When
multiple connections use a set of network addresses
to access the same server, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support both forms of trunking.
NFSv4.1 servers in a clustered configuration <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> allow
network addresses for different servers to use client ID
trunking.
</t>
<t>
Clients may use either form of trunking as long as they
do not, when trunking between different server network
addresses, violate the servers' mandates as to the
kinds of trunking to be allowed (see below). With regard
to callback channels, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> allow the server to
choose among all callback channels valid for a given
client ID and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support trunking when the connections
supporting the backchannel allow session or client ID
trunking to be used for callbacks.
</t>
<t>
Session trunking is essentially the association of multiple
connections, each with potentially different target and/or source
network addresses, to the same session. When the target network
addresses (server addresses) of the two connections are the same,
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
support such session trunking. When the target network addresses
are different, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> indicate such support using the
data returned by the EXCHANGE_ID operation (see below).
</t>
<t>
Client ID trunking is the association of multiple
sessions to the same client ID. Servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support client ID
trunking for two target network addresses whenever they allow
session trunking for those same two network addresses.
In addition, a server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>, by presenting the same
major server owner ID
(<xref target="Server_Owners" format="default"/>) and server scope
(<xref target="Server_Scope" format="default"/>), allow an additional
case of client ID trunking. When two
servers return the same major server owner and server
scope, it means that the two servers are cooperating on
locking state management, which is a prerequisite
for client ID trunking.
</t>
<t>
Distinguishing when the client is allowed to use session and
client ID trunking requires understanding how the results of the
EXCHANGE_ID (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>)
operation identify a server.
Suppose a client sends EXCHANGE_IDs over two different
connections, each with a possibly different target
network address, but each EXCHANGE_ID operation has the same
value in the eia_clientowner field. If the same
NFSv4.1 server is listening over each connection,
then each EXCHANGE_ID result <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the same
values of eir_clientid, eir_server_owner.so_major_id,
and eir_server_scope. The client can then treat each
connection as referring to the same server (subject
to verification; see
<xref target="PREP-trunk-verify" format="default"/> below),
and it can use each connection to trunk requests and
replies.
The client's choice is whether session trunking
or client ID trunking applies.
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>Session Trunking.</dt>
<dd>
<t>
If the eia_clientowner argument is the same in
two different EXCHANGE_ID requests, and
the eir_clientid, eir_server_owner.so_major_id,
eir_server_owner.so_minor_id, and eir_server_scope
results match in both EXCHANGE_ID results, then
the client is permitted to perform session trunking.
If the client has no session mapping to the tuple of
eir_clientid, eir_server_owner.so_major_id, eir_server_scope, and
eir_server_owner.so_minor_id, then it creates
the session via a CREATE_SESSION operation over one
of the connections, which associates the connection
to the session. If there is a session for the tuple,
the client can send BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION to associate
the connection to the session.
</t>
<t>
Of course, if the client
does not desire to use session trunking, it is not
required to do so. It can invoke
CREATE_SESSION on the connection. This will result
in client ID trunking as described below. It can also
decide to drop the connection if it does not choose to
use trunking.
</t>
</dd>
<dt>Client ID Trunking.</dt>
<dd>
<t>
If the eia_clientowner argument is the same in
two different EXCHANGE_ID requests, and
the eir_clientid, eir_server_owner.so_major_id,
and eir_server_scope
results match in both EXCHANGE_ID results, then
the client is permitted to perform client ID trunking
(regardless of whether the eir_server_owner.so_minor_id results match).
The client can associate
each connection with different sessions, where
each session is associated with the same server.
</t>
<t>
The client completes the act of client ID trunking by invoking
CREATE_SESSION on each connection, using the same
client ID that was returned in eir_clientid. These
invocations create two sessions and also associate
each connection with its respective session. The client
is free to decline to use client ID trunking by simply
dropping the connection at this point.
</t>
<t>
When doing client ID trunking, locking state
is shared across sessions associated with that same
client ID. This requires the server to coordinate
state across sessions and the client to be able to
associate the same locking state with multiple sessions.
</t>
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
It is always possible that, as a result of various sorts
of reconfiguration events, eir_server_scope and
eir_server_owner values may be different on subsequent
EXCHANGE_ID requests made to the same network address.
</t>
<t>
In most cases, such reconfiguration events will be
disruptive and indicate that an IP address formerly connected
to one server is now connected to an entirely different one.
</t>
<t>
Some guidelines on client handling of such situations follow:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When eir_server_scope changes, the client has no assurance
that any IDs that it obtained previously (e.g., filehandles) can
be validly used on the new server, and, even if the new
server accepts them, there is no assurance that this is not
due to accident. Thus, it is best to treat all such state
as lost or stale, although a client may assume that the
probability of inadvertent acceptance is low and treat
this situation as within the next case.
</li>
<li>
When eir_server_scope remains the same and
eir_server_owner.so_major_id changes, the client can use
the filehandles it has, consider its locking state lost,
and attempt
to reclaim or otherwise re-obtain its locks. It might find
that
its filehandle is now stale. However, if NFS4ERR_STALE is not
returned, it can proceed to reclaim or otherwise re-obtain its
open locking state.
</li>
<li>
When eir_server_scope and
eir_server_owner.so_major_id remain the same,
the client has to use the now-current values
of eir_server_owner.so_minor_id in deciding on appropriate
forms of trunking. This may result in connections being
dropped or new sessions being created.
</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="PREP-trunk-verify" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Verifying Claims of Matching Server Identity</name>
<t>
When the server responds using two different connections that claim
matching or partially matching eir_server_owner,
eir_server_scope, and eir_clientid values, the client
does not have to trust the servers' claims. The client
may verify these claims before trunking traffic in
the following ways:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
For session trunking,
clients <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
reliably verify if connections between different
network paths are in fact associated with the same NFSv4.1
server and usable on the same session, and servers
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> allow clients to perform reliable verification.
When a client ID is created, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> specify that
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION is to be verified according to the
SP4_SSV or SP4_MACH_CRED (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>)
state protection options. For SP4_SSV, reliable
verification depends on a shared secret (the
SSV) that is established via the SET_SSV (see
<xref target="OP_SET_SSV" format="default"/>) operation.
</t>
<t>
When a new connection is associated with the
session (via the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION operation,
see <xref target="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION" format="default"/>), if
the client specified SP4_SSV state protection for the
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION operation, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send
the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION with RPCSEC_GSS protection,
using integrity or privacy, and an RPCSEC_GSS handle created
with the GSS SSV mechanism (see <xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
If the client mistakenly tries to associate a
connection to a session of a wrong server, the
server will either reject the attempt because
it is not aware of the session identifier of the
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION arguments, or it will reject
the attempt because the RPCSEC_GSS authentication
fails. Even if the server mistakenly or maliciously
accepts the connection association attempt, the
RPCSEC_GSS verifier it computes in the response
will not be verified by the client, so the client will
know it cannot use the connection for trunking the
specified session. </t>
<t> If the
client specified SP4_MACH_CRED state protection, the
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION operation will use RPCSEC_GSS
integrity or privacy, using the same credential that
was used when the client ID was created. Mutual
authentication via RPCSEC_GSS assures the client
that the connection is associated with the correct
session of the correct server.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
For client ID trunking, the client has at least two
options for verifying that the same client ID
obtained from two different EXCHANGE_ID operations
came from the same server. The first option is
to use RPCSEC_GSS authentication when sending each
EXCHANGE_ID operation. Each time an EXCHANGE_ID is sent with
RPCSEC_GSS authentication, the client notes the
principal name of the GSS target. If the EXCHANGE_ID
results indicate that client ID trunking is possible,
and the GSS targets' principal names are the same,
the servers are the same and client ID trunking is
allowed.
</t>
<t>
The second option for verification is to
use SP4_SSV protection. When the client sends
EXCHANGE_ID, it specifies SP4_SSV protection. The
first EXCHANGE_ID the client sends always has to
be confirmed by a CREATE_SESSION call. The client
then sends SET_SSV. Later, the client
sends EXCHANGE_ID to a second destination
network address different from the one the first
EXCHANGE_ID was sent to.
The client checks that each EXCHANGE_ID reply has the
same eir_clientid, eir_server_owner.so_major_id, and
eir_server_scope. If so, the client verifies the
claim by sending a CREATE_SESSION operation to the second
destination address, protected with RPCSEC_GSS integrity
using an RPCSEC_GSS handle returned by the second
EXCHANGE_ID. If the server accepts the CREATE_SESSION
request, and if the client verifies the RPCSEC_GSS
verifier and integrity codes, then the client has
proof the second server knows the SSV, and thus
the two servers are cooperating for the purposes of
specifying server scope and client ID trunking.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="Exactly_Once_Semantics" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Exactly Once Semantics</name>
<t>
Via the session, NFSv4.1 offers exactly once semantics (EOS)
for requests sent over a channel. EOS is supported on both the
fore channel and backchannel.
</t>
<t>
Each COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND request that is sent
with a leading SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE operation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be executed by the receiver exactly once. This requirement
holds regardless of whether the request is sent with reply
caching specified (see <xref target="optional_reply_caching" format="default"/>).
The requirement holds even if the requester is sending the
request over a session created between a pNFS data client
and pNFS data server. To understand the rationale for this requirement,
divide the requests into three
classifications:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Non-idempotent requests.
</li>
<li>
Idempotent modifying requests.
</li>
<li>
Idempotent non-modifying requests.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
An example of a non-idempotent request is
RENAME. Obviously, if a replier executes the
same RENAME request twice, and the first execution succeeds,
the re-execution will fail. If the replier returns the
result from the re-execution, this result is incorrect.
Therefore, EOS is required for non-idempotent requests.
</t>
<t>
An example of an idempotent modifying request is
a COMPOUND request containing a WRITE operation.
Repeated execution of the same WRITE
has the same effect as execution of that WRITE a single time.
Nevertheless, enforcing EOS for WRITEs and other idempotent
modifying requests is necessary
to avoid data corruption.
</t>
<t>
Suppose a client sends WRITE A to a
noncompliant server that does not enforce EOS, and
receives no response, perhaps due to a network
partition. The client reconnects to the server and
re-sends WRITE A. Now, the server has
outstanding two instances of A. The
server can be in a situation in which it executes and
replies to the retry of A, while the first
A is still waiting in the server's internal I/O system for some
resource. Upon receiving the
reply to the second attempt of WRITE A,
the client believes its WRITE is done so it is free
to send WRITE B, which overlaps the byte-range of
A. When the original A is dispatched from the server's
I/O system and
executed (thus the second time A will have
been written), then what has been
written by B can be overwritten and thus corrupted.
</t>
<t>
An example of an idempotent non-modifying request
is a COMPOUND containing SEQUENCE, PUTFH, READLINK,
and nothing else. The re-execution of such a
request will not cause data corruption or
produce an incorrect result. Nonetheless,
to keep the implementation simple,
the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> enforce EOS for all requests, whether or not
idempotent and non-modifying.
</t>
<t>
Note that true and complete EOS is not possible unless the
server persists the reply cache in stable storage, and unless the
server is somehow implemented to never require a restart
(indeed, if such a server exists, the distinction between a
reply cache kept in stable storage versus one that is not is
one without meaning). See <xref target="Persistence" format="default"/> for
a discussion of persistence in the reply cache.
Regardless, even if the server does not persist the reply cache,
EOS improves robustness and correctness over previous versions
of NFS because the legacy duplicate request/reply caches were
based on the ONC RPC transaction identifier (XID).
<xref target="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" format="default"/>
explains the shortcomings of the XID as a basis for
a reply cache and describes how NFSv4.1 sessions improve
upon the XID.
</t>
<section anchor="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Slot Identifiers and Reply Cache</name>
<t>
The RPC layer provides a transaction ID (XID), which,
while required to be unique, is not
convenient for tracking requests for two reasons.
First, the XID is only
meaningful to the requester; it cannot be interpreted
by the replier except to test for equality with
previously sent requests. When consulting an RPC-based
duplicate request cache, the opaqueness of the XID requires
a computationally expensive look up (often via a hash that
includes XID and source address). NFSv4.1 requests use
a non-opaque slot ID, which is an index into a slot table,
which is far more efficient. Second, because RPC requests
can be executed by the replier in any order, there is
no bound on the number of requests that may be outstanding
at any time. To achieve perfect EOS, using ONC RPC
would require storing all replies in the reply cache.
XIDs are 32 bits; storing over four billion (2<sup>32</sup>) replies
in the reply cache is not practical. In practice, previous versions
of NFS have chosen to store a fixed number of replies in
the cache, and to use a least recently used (LRU) approach to
replacing cache entries with new entries when the cache
is full. In NFSv4.1, the number of outstanding requests is
bounded by the size of the slot table, and a sequence ID
per slot is used to tell the replier when it is safe to
delete a cached reply.
</t>
<t>
In the NFSv4.1 reply cache, when the requester sends a new request,
it selects a slot ID in the
range 0..N, where N is the replier's current maximum slot ID
granted to the requester on the session over which the request is to be
sent. The value of N starts out as equal to
ca_maxrequests - 1 (<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>), but
can be adjusted by the response to SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE as described
later in this section.
The slot ID must be unused by any of the requests that the
requester has already active on the session. "Unused" here means the
requester has no outstanding request for that slot ID.
</t>
<t>
A slot contains a sequence ID and the cached reply corresponding to
the request sent with that sequence ID. The sequence ID is a
32-bit unsigned value, and is therefore in the range 0..0xFFFFFFFF (2<sup>32</sup> - 1).
The first time a slot is used, the requester <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> specify
a sequence ID of one (<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>).
Each time a slot is reused, the request <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> specify a sequence ID
that is one greater than that of the previous request on the
slot. If the previous sequence ID was 0xFFFFFFFF, then the next
request for the slot <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have the sequence ID set to zero (i.e.,
(2<sup>32</sup> - 1) + 1 mod 2<sup>32</sup>).
</t>
<t>
The sequence ID accompanies the slot ID in each request. It is
for the critical check at the replier: it used to efficiently
determine whether a request using a certain
slot ID is a retransmit or a new, never-before-seen request. It is
not feasible for the requester to assert that it is retransmitting to
implement this, because for any given request the requester cannot
know whether the replier has seen it unless the replier actually replies. Of
course, if the requester has seen the reply, the requester would
not retransmit.
</t>
<t>
The replier compares each received request's
sequence ID with the last one previously received for that slot ID,
to see if the new request is:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
A new request, in which the sequence ID is one greater
than that previously seen in the slot (accounting for sequence
wraparound). The replier proceeds to execute the new request,
and the replier
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> increase the slot's sequence ID by one.
</li>
<li>
A retransmitted request, in which the sequence ID is equal to
that currently recorded in the slot.
If the original request has
executed to completion, the replier returns the cached
reply. See <xref target="Retry_and_Replay" format="default"/> for direction on how the replier
deals with retries of requests that are still in progress.
</li>
<li>
A misordered retry, in which the sequence ID
is less than (accounting for sequence wraparound)
that previously seen in the slot. The
replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED (as the
result from SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE).
</li>
<li>
A misordered new request, in which the sequence ID
is two or more than (accounting for sequence
wraparound) that previously seen in the
slot. Note that because the sequence ID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
wrap around to zero once it reaches 0xFFFFFFFF, a
misordered new request and a misordered retry
cannot be distinguished. Thus, the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED (as the result from
SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE).
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Unlike the XID, the slot ID is always within a specific
range; this has two implications. The first
implication is that for a given session, the replier
need only cache the results of a limited number of
COMPOUND requests.
The second implication derives
from the first, which is that unlike XID-indexed reply
caches (also known as duplicate request caches - DRCs),
the slot ID-based reply cache cannot be overflowed.
Through use of the sequence ID to identify
retransmitted requests, the replier does not need to
actually cache the request itself, reducing the
storage requirements of the reply cache further. These
facilities make it practical to maintain all the
required entries for an effective reply cache.
</t>
<t>
The slot ID, sequence ID, and session ID therefore take over the traditional role
of the XID and source network address in the replier's
reply cache implementation.
This approach is considerably
more portable and completely robust -- it is not subject to the
reassignment of ports as clients reconnect over IP
networks. In addition, the RPC XID is not used in the reply cache,
enhancing robustness of the cache in the face of any rapid reuse of
XIDs by the requester. While the replier does not care
about the XID for the purposes of reply cache management
(but the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the same XID that was in the request),
nonetheless there are considerations for the XID in NFSv4.1
that are the same as all other previous versions of NFS.
The RPC XID remains in each message and needs to be formulated
in NFSv4.1 requests as in any other ONC RPC request. The reasons
include:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The RPC layer retains its existing semantics and implementation.
</li>
<li>
The requester and replier must be able to interoperate at the
RPC layer, prior to the NFSv4.1 decoding of the SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE
operation.
</li>
<li>
If an operation is being used that does not start with
SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE (e.g., BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION),
then the RPC XID is needed for correct operation to
match the reply to the request.
</li>
<li>
The SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE operation may generate an error.
If so, the embedded slot ID, sequence ID, and session ID (if
present) in the request will not be in the reply, and the
requester has only the XID to match the reply to the request.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Given that well-formulated XIDs continue to be required,
this raises the question: why do SEQUENCE and CB_SEQUENCE replies
have a session ID, slot ID, and sequence ID? Having the session ID
in the reply means that the requester does not have to use the
XID to look up
the session ID, which would be necessary if the connection were
associated with multiple sessions. Having the slot ID and sequence ID
in the reply means that the requester does not have to use the XID to
look up the slot ID and sequence ID.
Furthermore, since the XID is only 32 bits, it is too small to
guarantee the re-association of a reply with its request
<xref target="rpc_xid_issues" format="default"/>; having
session ID, slot ID, and sequence ID in the reply allows the
client to validate that the reply in fact belongs to the matched request.
</t>
<t>
The SEQUENCE (and CB_SEQUENCE) operation also carries
a "highest_slotid" value, which carries additional
requester slot usage information. The requester <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
always indicate the slot ID representing the outstanding request with the
highest-numbered slot
value.
The requester should in all cases provide the most
conservative value possible, although it can be increased somewhat
above the actual instantaneous usage to maintain some minimum or
optimal level. This provides a way for the requester to yield unused
request slots back to the replier, which in turn can use the
information to reallocate resources.
</t>
<t>
The replier
responds with both a new target highest_slotid and an
enforced highest_slotid, described as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
The target highest_slotid is
an indication to the requester of the highest_slotid the replier
wishes the requester to be using. This permits the replier to withdraw
(or add) resources from a requester that has been found to not be
using them, in order to more fairly share resources among a varying
level of demand from other requesters. The requester must always comply
with the replier's value updates, since they indicate newly
established hard limits on the requester's access to session
resources. However, because of request pipelining, the requester may
have active requests in flight reflecting prior values; therefore,
the replier must not immediately require the requester to comply.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
The enforced highest_slotid indicates the highest slot ID
the requester is permitted to use on a subsequent SEQUENCE or
CB_SEQUENCE operation. The replier's enforced highest_slotid <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
be no less than the highest_slotid the requester indicated
in the SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE arguments.
</t>
<t>
A requester can be intransigent with respect to lowering its
highest_slotid argument to a Sequence operation, i.e. the requester
continues to ignore the target highest_slotid in the response to
a Sequence operation, and continues to set its highest_slotid
argument to be higher than the target highest_slotid. This can
be considered particularly egregious behavior when the replier
knows there are no outstanding requests with slot IDs higher than
its target highest_slotid. When faced with such intransigence,
the replier is free to take more forceful action, and <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> reply with
a new enforced highest_slotid that is less than its previous
enforced highest_slotid. Thereafter, if the requester continues
to send requests with a highest_slotid that is greater than
the replier's new enforced highest_slotid, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_BAD_HIGH_SLOT, unless the slot ID in the request is greater
than the new enforced highest_slotid and the request is a retry.
</t>
<t>
The replier <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> retain the slots it wants to retire
until
the requester sends a request with a highest_slotid less than
or equal to the replier's new enforced highest_slotid.
</t>
<t>
The requester can also be intransigent with
respect to sending non-retry requests that have a slot ID that
exceeds the replier's highest_slotid.
Once the replier has forcibly lowered the enforced
highest_slotid, the requester is only allowed to
send retries on slots that exceed the replier's highest_slotid.
If a request is received with a slot ID that is higher than
the new enforced highest_slotid, and the sequence ID
is one higher than what is in the slot's reply cache, then
the server can both retire the slot and return NFS4ERR_BADSLOT
(however, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> do one and not the other).
The reason it is safe to retire the slot
is because by using the next sequence ID, the requester
is indicating it has received the previous reply for the
slot.
</t>
</li>
<li>
The requester <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> use the lowest available
slot when sending a new request. This way, the
replier may be able to retire slot entries faster.
However, where the replier is actively adjusting
its granted highest_slotid,
it will not be able
to use only the receipt of the slot ID and highest_slotid
in the request. Neither the slot ID nor the
highest_slotid used in a request may reflect the
replier's current idea of the requester's session
limit, because the request may have been sent from the
requester before the update was received. Therefore,
in the downward adjustment case, the replier may have
to retain a number of reply cache entries at least as
large as the old value of maximum requests
outstanding, until it can infer that the requester
has seen a reply containing the new granted highest_slotid.
The replier can infer that the requester has seen such a
reply when it receives a new request with the same
slot ID as the request replied to and the next higher
sequence ID.
</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="cacheseq" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Caching of SEQUENCE and CB_SEQUENCE Replies</name>
<t>
When a SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE operation is
successfully executed, its reply <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> always be
cached. Specifically, session ID, sequence ID,
and slot ID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be cached in the reply cache.
The reply from SEQUENCE also includes the highest
slot ID, target highest slot ID, and status flags. Instead
of caching these values, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
re-compute the values from the current
state of the fore channel, session, and/or client
ID as appropriate. Similarly, the reply from
CB_SEQUENCE includes a highest slot ID and target
highest slot ID. The client
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> re-compute the values from the
current state of the session as appropriate.
</t>
<t>
Regardless of whether or not a replier is re-computing highest slot ID,
target slot ID, and status on replies to retries, the requester
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> assume that the values are being re-computed whenever it
receives a reply after a retry is sent, since it has no way
of knowing whether the reply it has received was sent by the
replier in response to the retry or is a delayed response to
the original request. Therefore, it may be the case that
highest slot ID, target slot ID, or status bits may reflect
the state of affairs when the request was first executed.
Although acting based on such delayed information is valid,
it may cause the receiver of the reply to do unneeded work. Requesters
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> choose to send additional requests to get the current
state of affairs or use the state of affairs reported by
subsequent requests, in preference to acting immediately
on data that might be out of date.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_sequence" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Errors from SEQUENCE and CB_SEQUENCE</name>
<t>
Any time SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE returns an error, the
sequence ID of the slot <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> change. The replier <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
modify the reply cache entry for the slot whenever an error
is returned from SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Errors from SEQUENCE and CB_SEQUENCE -->
<section anchor="optional_reply_caching" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Optional Reply Caching</name>
<t>
On a per-request basis, the requester can choose to
direct the replier to cache the reply to all operations
after the first operation (SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE) via
the sa_cachethis or csa_cachethis fields of the arguments
to SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE.
The reason it would not direct the replier to cache
the entire reply is that the request is composed of all
idempotent operations <xref target="Chet" format="default"/>.
Caching the reply may offer little benefit. If
the reply is too large (see
<xref target="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" format="default"/>),
it may not be cacheable anyway. Even if the reply to
idempotent request is small enough to cache, unnecessarily
caching the reply slows down the server and increases
RPC latency.
</t>
<t>
Whether or not the requester requests the reply to be cached
has no effect on the slot processing. If the
result of SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE is NFS4_OK, then
the slot's sequence ID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be incremented by one.
If a requester does not direct the replier to cache
the reply, the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> do one of following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The replier can cache the entire original reply.
Even though sa_cachethis or csa_cachethis is FALSE,
the replier is always free to cache. It may choose
this approach in order to simplify implementation.
</li>
<li>
<t>
The replier enters into its reply cache a reply consisting
of the original results to the SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE
operation, and with the next operation in
COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND having the error NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP.
Thus, if the requester later retries the request, it will
get NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP.
If a replier receives a retried Sequence operation where the reply
to the COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND was not cached, then the replier,
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP
in reply to a Sequence operation if the
Sequence operation is not the first
operation (granted, a requester that
does so is in violation of the NFSv4.1
protocol).
</li>
<li>
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP in reply to
a Sequence operation if the Sequence
operation is the first operation.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
If the second operation is an illegal operation, or an
operation that was legal in a previous minor version of
NFSv4 and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
be supported in the current minor version (e.g., SETCLIENTID), the
replier <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> ever return NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP.
Instead the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL or
NFS4ERR_BADXDR or NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP as appropriate.
</li>
<li>
If the second operation can result in another error status,
the replier <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return a status other than NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
provided the operation is not executed in such a way that the state
of the replier is changed. Examples of such
an error status include: NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP returned for an
operation that is legal but not <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> in the current
minor versions, and thus not supported by the replier;
NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS; and NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The discussion above assumes that the
retried request matches the original
one. <xref target="false_retry" format="default"/>
discusses what the replier might do, and
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> do when original and retried requests do not match.
Since the replier may
only cache a small amount of the
information that would be required to
determine whether this is a case of a
false retry, the replier may send to the
client any of the following responses:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The cached reply to the original request (if the replier has cached
it in its entirety and the users of the original request and retry match).
</li>
<li>
A reply that consists only of the Sequence operation with the error
NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY.
</li>
<li>
A reply consisting of the response to Sequence with the status
NFS4_OK, together with the second operation as it appeared in the retried
request with an error of NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP or other error as
described above.
</li>
<li>
A reply that consists of the response to Sequence with the status
NFS4_OK, together with the second operation as it appeared in the original
request with an error of NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP or other error as
described above.
</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="false_retry" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>False Retry</name>
<t>
If a requester sent a Sequence operation
with a slot ID and sequence ID that are
in the reply cache but the replier
detected that the retried request is not
the same as the original request,
including a retry that has different
operations or different arguments in the
operations from the original and a retry
that uses a different principal in the
RPC request's credential field that
translates to a different user, then this
is a false retry. When the replier
detects a false retry, it is permitted
(but not always obligated) to return
NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY in response to the
Sequence operation when it detects a
false retry.
</t>
<t>
Translations of particularly privileged
user values to other users due to the
lack of appropriately secure credentials,
as configured on the replier, should be
applied before determining whether the
users are the same or different. If the
replier determines the users are
different between the original request
and a retry, then the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY.
</t>
<t>
If an operation of the retry is an
illegal operation, or an operation that
was legal in a previous minor version of
NFSv4 and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be supported in the
current minor version (e.g., SETCLIENTID),
the replier <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY (and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> do so if
the users of the original request and
retry differ). Otherwise, the replier <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL or NFS4ERR_BADXDR or
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP as appropriate. Note
that the handling is in contrast for how the
replier deals with retries requests with
no cached reply. The difference is due to
NFS4ERR_FALSE_RETRY being a valid error
for only Sequence operations, whereas
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP is a valid
error for all operations except illegal
operations and operations that <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be
supported in the current minor version of
NFSv4.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Optional Reply Caching -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Slot Identifiers and Server Reply Cache -->
<section anchor="Retry_and_Replay" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Retry and Replay of Reply</name>
<t>
A requester <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> retry a request, unless
the connection it used to send the request
disconnects. The requester can then reconnect
and re-send the request, or it can re-send the
request over a different connection that is
associated with the same session.
</t>
<t>
If the requester is a server wanting to re-send a callback
operation over the backchannel of a session, the requester
of course cannot reconnect because only the client can
associate connections with the backchannel. The
server can re-send the request over another connection that
is bound to the same session's backchannel. If there is no
such connection, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> indicate that the session has no backchannel by setting
the SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN_SESSION flag bit in the response
to the next SEQUENCE operation from the client. The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
then associate a connection with the session (or destroy
the session).
</t>
<t>
Note that it is not fatal for a requester to retry
without a disconnect between the request and retry.
However, the retry does consume resources, especially
with RDMA, where each request, retry or not, consumes
a credit. Retries for no reason, especially retries
sent shortly after the previous attempt, are a poor
use of network bandwidth and defeat the purpose of a
transport's inherent congestion control system.
</t>
<t>
A requester <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> wait for a reply to a request before using
the slot for another request. If it does not wait for
a reply, then the requester does not know what
sequence ID to use for the slot on its next request.
For example, suppose a requester sends a request with sequence ID
1, and does not wait for the response. The next time it uses
the slot, it sends the new request with sequence ID 2.
If the replier has not seen the request with sequence ID 1, then
the replier is not expecting sequence ID 2, and rejects the
requester's new request with NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED (as the
result from SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE).
</t>
<t>
RDMA fabrics do not guarantee that the memory handles
(Steering Tags) within each RPC/RDMA "chunk" <xref target="RFC8166" format="default"/>
are valid on a scope
outside that of a single connection. Therefore, handles used by
the direct operations become invalid after connection loss. The
server must ensure that any RDMA operations that must be replayed
from the reply cache use the newly provided handle(s) from the
most recent request.
</t>
<t>
A retry might be sent while the original request is still in
progress on the replier. The replier <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> deal with the issue
by returning NFS4ERR_DELAY as the reply to SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE
operation, but implementations <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_MISORDERED.
Since errors from SEQUENCE and CB_SEQUENCE are
never recorded in the reply cache, this approach allows the
results of the execution of the original request to be
properly recorded in the reply cache (assuming that the requester
specified the reply to be cached).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Retry and Replay -->
<section anchor="sessions_callback_races" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Resolving Server Callback Races</name>
<t>
It is possible for server callbacks to arrive at the
client before the reply from related fore channel
operations. For example, a client may have been
granted a delegation to a file it has opened, but the
reply to the OPEN (informing the client of the
granting of the delegation) may be delayed in the
network. If a conflicting operation arrives at the
server, it will recall the delegation using the
backchannel, which may be on a different
transport connection, perhaps even a different
network, or even a different session associated with
the same client ID.
</t>
<t>
The presence of a session between the client and server
alleviates this issue. When a session is in place,
each client request is uniquely identified by its {
session ID, slot ID, sequence ID } triple. By the rules under which
slot entries (reply cache entries) are
retired, the server has knowledge whether the client
has "seen" each of the server's replies. The server
can therefore provide sufficient information to the
client to allow it to disambiguate between an
erroneous or conflicting callback race
condition.
</t>
<t>
For each client operation that might result in some
sort of server callback, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> "remember"
the { session ID, slot ID, sequence ID } triple of the client request
until the slot ID retirement rules allow the server to
determine that the client has, in fact, seen the
server's reply. Until the time the { session ID, slot ID,
sequence ID } request triple can be retired, any recalls
of the associated object <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> carry an array of these
referring identifiers (in the CB_SEQUENCE operation's
arguments), for the benefit of the client. After this
time, it is not necessary for the server to provide
this information in related callbacks, since it is
certain that a race condition can no longer occur.
</t>
<t>
The CB_SEQUENCE operation that begins each server
callback carries a list of "referring" { session ID, slot ID,
sequence ID } triples. If the client finds the request
corresponding to the referring session ID, slot ID, and sequence ID
to be currently outstanding (i.e., the server's reply has
not been seen by the client), it can determine that
the callback has raced the reply, and act
accordingly. If the client does not find the request
corresponding to the referring triple to be outstanding (including
the case of a session ID referring to a destroyed session),
then there is no race with respect to this triple.
The server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> limit the referring triples
to requests that refer to just those that apply to the objects
referred to in
the CB_COMPOUND procedure.
</t>
<t>
The client must not simply wait forever for the
expected server reply to arrive before responding to the
CB_COMPOUND that won the race,
because it is possible
that it will be delayed indefinitely. The client should
assume the likely case that the reply will arrive within
the average round-trip time for COMPOUND requests to the
server, and wait that period of time. If
that period of time
expires, it can respond to the CB_COMPOUND with
NFS4ERR_DELAY. There are other scenarios under which callbacks
may race replies.
Among them are pNFS layout recalls as described in
<xref target="pnfs_operation_sequencing" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Resolving server callback races with sessions -->
<section anchor="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND Construction Issues</name>
<t>
Very large requests and replies may pose both buffer
management issues (especially with RDMA) and reply
cache issues. When the session is created
(<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>), for each channel (fore and
back), the client and server
negotiate the maximum-sized request they will
send or process (ca_maxrequestsize), the maximum-sized reply
they will return or process (ca_maxresponsesize), and the
maximum-sized reply they will store in the reply cache
(ca_maxresponsesize_cached).
</t>
<t>
If a request exceeds ca_maxrequestsize, the reply will
have the status NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG. A replier <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG as the status for the first operation
(SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE) in the request (which means that
no operations in the request executed and that the
state of the slot in the reply cache is unchanged), or it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
opt to return it on a subsequent operation in the same
COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND request (which means that at least one
operation did execute and that the state of the slot in the reply cache does
change). The replier <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG on the
operation that exceeds ca_maxrequestsize.
</t>
<t>
If a reply exceeds ca_maxresponsesize, the reply will
have the status NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG. A replier <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG as the status for the first operation
(SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE) in the request, or it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
opt to return it on a subsequent operation (in the same
COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND reply). A replier <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG
in the reply to SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE, even if the response
would still exceed ca_maxresponsesize.
</t>
<t>
If sa_cachethis or csa_cachethis is TRUE, then the
replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> cache a reply except if an error is
returned by the SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE operation (see
<xref target="err_sequence" format="default"/>). If the reply exceeds
ca_maxresponsesize_cached (and sa_cachethis or
csa_cachethis is TRUE), then the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE. Even if
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE (or any other error for
that matter) is returned on an operation other than the
first operation (SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE), then
the reply <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be cached if sa_cachethis or
csa_cachethis is TRUE.
For example, if a COMPOUND has eleven
operations, including SEQUENCE, the fifth operation is
a RENAME, and the tenth operation is a READ for one
million bytes, the server may return
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE on the tenth operation.
Since the server executed several operations, especially
the non-idempotent RENAME, the client's request to
cache the reply needs to be honored in order for the
correct operation of exactly once semantics. If the
client retries the request, the server will have cached
a reply that contains results for ten of the eleven requested
operations, with
the tenth operation having a status of NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE.
</t>
<t>
A client needs to take care that, when sending
operations that change the current filehandle (except for
PUTFH, PUTPUBFH, PUTROOTFH, and RESTOREFH), it
does not exceed the maximum reply buffer before the GETFH
operation. Otherwise, the client will have to retry
the operation that changed the current filehandle, in order
to obtain the desired filehandle.
For the OPEN operation (see <xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/>),
retry is not always available as an option.
The following guidelines for the handling of
filehandle-changing operations are advised:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Within the same COMPOUND procedure, a client
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send GETFH immediately after a current
filehandle-changing operation. A client
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send GETFH after a current filehandle-changing operation
that is also non-idempotent (e.g., the OPEN operation), unless
the operation is RESTOREFH. RESTOREFH is
an exception, because even though it is
non-idempotent, the filehandle RESTOREFH
produced originated from an operation that
is either idempotent (e.g., PUTFH, LOOKUP),
or non-idempotent (e.g., OPEN, CREATE). If the
origin is non-idempotent, then because the client
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send GETFH after the origin operation, the
client can recover if RESTOREFH returns an error.
</li>
<li>
A server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG or
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE (if sa_cachethis is TRUE)
on a filehandle-changing operation if the reply would
be too large on the next operation.
</li>
<li>
A server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG or
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE (if sa_cachethis is TRUE)
on a filehandle-changing, non-idempotent operation if the reply would
be too large on the next operation, especially if the operation
is OPEN.
</li>
<li>
A server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_UNSAFE_COMPOUND to a non-idempotent
current filehandle-changing operation, if
it looks at the next operation (in the same COMPOUND procedure)
and finds it is
not GETFH. The server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> do this if it is unable to
determine in advance whether the total response size
would exceed ca_maxresponsesize_cached or ca_maxresponsesize.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<!-- [auth] COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND Construction Issues -->
<section anchor="Persistence" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Persistence</name>
<t>
Since the reply cache is bounded, it is practical for
the reply cache to persist across server restarts.
The replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> persist the following information
if it agreed to persist the session (when the session
was created; see <xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>):
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The session ID.
</li>
<li>
The slot table including the sequence ID and cached reply for
each slot.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The above are sufficient for a replier to provide EOS semantics
for any requests that were sent and executed before the server
restarted.
If the replier is a client, then there is no need for
it to persist any more information, unless the client will
be persisting all other state across client restart, in which case,
the server will never see any NFSv4.1-level protocol manifestation
of a client restart.
If the replier is a server, with just the
slot table and session ID persisting,
any requests the client retries after the server restart will
return the results that are cached in the reply cache,
and any new requests (i.e., the sequence ID is one greater than the
slot's sequence ID) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be rejected with NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION
(returned by SEQUENCE). Such a session is considered dead.
A server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> re-animate a session
after a server restart so that the session will accept new
requests as well as retries. To re-animate a session,
the server needs to persist additional information
through server restart:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The client ID. This is a prerequisite to let the client
create more sessions associated with the same client ID
as the re-animated session.
</li>
<li>
The client ID's sequence ID that is used for creating
sessions (see Sections <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="counter"/>). This is a
prerequisite to let the client create more sessions.
</li>
<li>
The principal that created the client ID. This
allows the server to authenticate the client when
it sends EXCHANGE_ID.
</li>
<li>
The SSV, if SP4_SSV state protection was
specified when the client ID was created (see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>). This lets the
client create new sessions, and associate connections
with the new and existing sessions.
</li>
<li>
The properties of the client ID as defined in
<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
A persistent reply cache places certain demands on the server.
The execution of the sequence of operations (starting with SEQUENCE)
and placement of its results in the persistent cache <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be atomic. If
a client retries a sequence of operations that was previously
executed on the server, the only acceptable outcomes are either
the original cached reply or an indication that the client ID
or session has been lost (indicating a catastrophic loss
of the reply cache or a session that has been deleted because
the client failed to use the session for an extended period
of time).
</t>
<t>
A server could fail and restart in the middle of a
COMPOUND procedure that contains one or more non-idempotent
or idempotent-but-modifying operations. This creates
an even higher challenge for atomic execution and
placement of results in the reply cache. One way
to view the problem is as a single transaction consisting of
each operation in the COMPOUND followed by storing
the result in persistent storage, then finally a transaction
commit. If there is a failure before the transaction
is committed, then the server rolls back the transaction.
If the server itself fails, then when it restarts, its
recovery logic could roll back the transaction
before starting the NFSv4.1 server.
</t>
<t>
While the description of the
implementation for atomic execution of the request
and caching of the reply
is beyond the scope of this document, an example implementation
for NFSv2 <xref target="RFC1094" format="default"/> is described in <xref target="ha_nfs_ibm" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Persistence -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Exactly Once Semantics -->
<section anchor="RDMA_Considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>RDMA Considerations</name>
<t>
A complete discussion of the operation of RPC-based
protocols over RDMA transports is in <xref target="RFC8166" format="default"/>. A
discussion of the operation of NFSv4, including NFSv4.1,
over RDMA is in <xref target="RFC8267" format="default"/>. Where RDMA is considered,
this specification assumes the use of such a layering;
it addresses only the upper-layer issues relevant to
making best use of RPC/RDMA.
</t>
<section anchor="RDMA_Connection_Resources" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>RDMA Connection Resources</name>
<t>
RDMA requires its consumers to register memory and post
buffers of a specific size and number for receive
operations.
</t>
<t>
Registration of memory can be a relatively high-overhead operation,
since it requires pinning of buffers, assignment of attributes
(e.g., readable/writable), and initialization of hardware
translation. Preregistration is desirable to reduce overhead.
These registrations are specific to hardware interfaces and even to
RDMA connection endpoints; therefore, negotiation of their limits is
desirable to manage resources effectively.
</t>
<t>
Following basic registration, these buffers must be posted by
the RPC layer to handle receives. These buffers remain in use by
the RPC/NFSv4.1 implementation; the size and number of them must be
known to the remote peer in order to avoid RDMA errors that would
cause a fatal error on the RDMA connection.
</t>
<t>
NFSv4.1 manages slots as resources on a per-session
basis (see <xref target="Session" format="default"/>), while RDMA
connections manage credits on a per-connection basis.
This means that in order for a peer to send data over
RDMA to a remote buffer, it has to have both an NFSv4.1
slot and an RDMA credit. If multiple RDMA connections
are associated with a session, then if the total number
of credits across all RDMA connections associated with
the session is X, and the number of slots in the session
is Y, then the maximum number of outstanding requests
is the lesser of X and Y.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] RDMA Connection Resources -->
<section anchor="Flow_Control" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Flow Control</name>
<t>
Previous versions of NFS do not provide flow control;
instead, they rely on the windowing provided by
transports like TCP to throttle requests. This does
not work with RDMA, which provides no operation flow
control and will terminate a connection in error when
limits are exceeded.
Limits such as maximum number of requests
outstanding are therefore negotiated when a session
is created (see the ca_maxrequests field in <xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>). These limits then
provide the maxima within which each connection associated
with the session's channel(s) must remain.
RDMA connections are managed within these limits as
described in <xref target="RFC8166" sectionFormat="of" section="3.3"/>; if there are multiple
RDMA connections, then the maximum number of requests
for a channel will be divided among the RDMA
connections. Put a different way, the onus is on the
replier to ensure that the total number of RDMA credits
across all connections associated with the replier's
channel does exceed the channel's maximum number of
outstanding requests.
</t>
<t>
The limits may also be modified
dynamically at the replier's choosing by manipulating
certain parameters present in each NFSv4.1 reply. In
addition, the CB_RECALL_SLOT callback operation (see
<xref target="OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT" format="default"/>) can be sent by
a server to a client to return RDMA credits to the
server, thereby lowering the maximum number of requests
a client can have outstanding to the server.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Flow Control -->
<section anchor="Padding" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Padding</name>
<t>
Header padding is requested by each peer at session initiation
(see the ca_headerpadsize argument to CREATE_SESSION in
<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>), and
subsequently used by the RPC RDMA layer, as described in <xref target="RFC8166" format="default"/>.
Zero padding is permitted.
</t>
<t>
Padding leverages the useful property
that RDMA preserve alignment of data, even when they are
placed into anonymous (untagged) buffers. If requested, client
inline writes will insert appropriate pad bytes within the request
header to align the data payload on the specified boundary. The
client is encouraged to add sufficient padding (up to the
negotiated size) so that
the "data" field of the WRITE operation
is aligned.
Most servers can make good use of such padding,
which allows them to chain receive buffers in such a way that any
data carried by client requests will be placed into appropriate
buffers at the server, ready for file system processing. The
receiver's RPC layer encounters no overhead from skipping over pad
bytes, and the RDMA layer's high performance makes the insertion
and transmission of padding on the sender a significant
optimization. In this way, the need for servers to perform RDMA
Read to satisfy all but the largest client writes is obviated. An
added benefit is the reduction of message round trips on the network
-- a potentially good trade, where latency is present.
</t>
<t>
The value to choose for padding is subject to a number of criteria.
A primary source of variable-length data in the RPC header is the
authentication information, the form of which is client-determined,
possibly in response to server specification. The contents of
COMPOUNDs, sizes of strings such as those passed to RENAME, etc. all
go into the determination of a maximal NFSv4.1 request size and
therefore minimal buffer size. The client must select its offered
value carefully, so as to avoid overburdening the server, and vice
versa. The benefit of an appropriate padding value is higher
performance.
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
Sender gather:
|RPC Request|Pad bytes|Length| -> |User data...|
\------+----------------------/ \
\ \
\ Receiver scatter: \-----------+- ...
/-----+----------------\ \ \
|RPC Request|Pad|Length| -> |FS buffer|->|FS buffer|->...
]]></artwork>
<t>
In the above case, the server may recycle unused buffers to the
next posted receive if unused by the actual received request, or
may pass the now-complete buffers by reference for normal write
processing. For a server that can make use of it, this removes
any need for data copies of incoming data, without resorting to
complicated end-to-end buffer advertisement and management. This
includes most kernel-based and integrated server designs, among
many others. The client may perform similar optimizations, if
desired.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Padding -->
<section anchor="dual" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Dual RDMA and Non-RDMA Transports</name>
<t>
Some RDMA transports (e.g., RFC 5040 <xref target="RFC5040" format="default"/>)
permit a "streaming" (non-RDMA) phase,
where ordinary traffic might flow before "stepping up"
to RDMA mode, commencing RDMA traffic. Some RDMA
transports start connections always in RDMA mode.
NFSv4.1 allows, but does not assume, a streaming phase
before RDMA mode. When a connection
is associated with a session, the client and server negotiate whether the
connection is used in RDMA or non-RDMA mode (see Sections
<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION" format="counter"/>).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] RDMA Transports -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] RDMA Considerations -->
<section anchor="Sessions_Security" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Session Security</name>
<section anchor="Session_Callback_Security" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Session Callback Security</name>
<t>
Via session/connection association, NFSv4.1 improves security over
that provided by NFSv4.0 for the backchannel. The
connection is client-initiated (see
<xref target="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION" format="default"/>) and subject to the same
firewall and routing checks as the fore channel.
At the client's option (see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>),
connection association is fully authenticated before being
activated (see <xref target="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION" format="default"/>).
Traffic from the server over the
backchannel is authenticated exactly as the client specifies
(see <xref target="Backchannel_RPC_Security" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Session Callback Security -->
<section anchor="Backchannel_RPC_Security" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Backchannel RPC Security</name>
<t>
When the NFSv4.1 client establishes the backchannel, it
informs the server of the security flavors and principals
to use when sending requests. If the security flavor is
RPCSEC_GSS, the client expresses the principal in the form
of an established RPCSEC_GSS context. The server is free
to use any of the flavor/principal combinations the client
offers, but it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use unoffered combinations.
This way, the client need not provide a target
GSS principal for the backchannel as it did with
NFSv4.0, nor does the server have to implement an
RPCSEC_GSS initiator as it did with NFSv4.0 <xref target="RFC3530" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
The CREATE_SESSION (<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>)
and BACKCHANNEL_CTL (<xref target="OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL" format="default"/>)
operations allow the client to specify flavor/principal combinations.
</t>
<t>
Also note that the SP4_SSV state protection mode
(see Sections <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="counter"/> and <xref target="protect_state_change" format="counter"/>) has the side
benefit of providing SSV-derived RPCSEC_GSS contexts (<xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Backchannel RPC Security -->
<section anchor="protect_state_change" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Protection from Unauthorized State Changes</name>
<t>
As described to this point in the specification, the state model
of NFSv4.1 is vulnerable to an attacker that
sends a SEQUENCE operation with a forged session ID and with a slot ID that
it expects the legitimate client to use next. When the legitimate client
uses the slot ID with the same sequence number, the server
returns the attacker's result from the reply cache, which
disrupts the legitimate client and thus denies service to it.
Similarly, an attacker could send a CREATE_SESSION with a forged
client ID to create a new session associated with the client ID.
The attacker could send requests using the new session that
change locking state, such as LOCKU operations to release locks
the legitimate client has acquired. Setting a security
policy on the file that requires RPCSEC_GSS credentials when
manipulating the file's state is one potential work around,
but has the disadvantage of preventing a legitimate client from
releasing state when RPCSEC_GSS is required to do so, but
a GSS context cannot be obtained (possibly because the user
has logged off the client).
</t>
<t>
NFSv4.1 provides three options to a client for state protection,
which are specified when a client creates
a client ID via EXCHANGE_ID (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The first (SP4_NONE) is to simply waive state protection.
</t>
<t>
The other two options (SP4_MACH_CRED and SP4_SSV)
share several traits:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
An RPCSEC_GSS-based credential is used to authenticate
client ID and session maintenance operations,
including creating and destroying a session,
associating a connection with the session, and
destroying the client ID.
</li>
<li>
Because RPCSEC_GSS is used to authenticate
client ID and session maintenance, the attacker cannot
associate a rogue connection with a legitimate session, or
associate a rogue session with a legitimate client ID in
order to maliciously alter the client ID's lock state
via CLOSE, LOCKU, DELEGRETURN, LAYOUTRETURN, etc.
</li>
<li>
In cases where the server's security policies on a
portion of its namespace require RPCSEC_GSS authentication,
a client may have to use an RPCSEC_GSS credential
to remove per-file state (e.g., LOCKU, CLOSE, etc.).
The server may require that the principal that removes
the state match certain criteria (e.g.,
the principal might have to be the same as the one
that acquired the state). However, the client might
not have an RPCSEC_GSS context for such a principal,
and might not be able to create such a context (perhaps
because the user has logged off). When the client
establishes SP4_MACH_CRED or SP4_SSV protection,
it can specify a list of operations that the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
allow using the machine credential (if SP4_MACH_CRED
is used) or the SSV credential (if SP4_SSV is used).
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The SP4_MACH_CRED state protection option uses a machine
credential where the principal that
creates the client ID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> also be the principal
that performs client ID and session maintenance
operations.
The security of the machine credential state protection approach
depends entirely on safeguarding the per-machine credential.
Assuming a proper safeguard using the per-machine credential
for operations like CREATE_SESSION, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
DESTROY_SESSION, and DESTROY_CLIENTID will prevent an attacker
from associating a rogue connection with a session, or
associating a rogue session with a client ID.
</t>
<t>
There are at least three scenarios for the SP4_MACH_CRED
option:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The system administrator configures a unique,
permanent per-machine credential for one of the
mandated GSS mechanisms (e.g., if Kerberos
V5 is used, a "keytab" containing a principal derived from a
client host name could be used).
</li>
<li>
The client is used by a single user, and so the
client ID and its sessions are used by just that
user. If the user's credential expires, then session
and client ID maintenance cannot occur, but since
the client has a single user, only that user is
inconvenienced.
</li>
<li>
The physical client has multiple users, but the
client implementation has a unique client ID for
each user. This is effectively the same as the
second scenario, but a disadvantage is that each
user needs to be allocated at least one session each,
so the approach suffers from lack of economy.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
The SP4_SSV protection option uses the SSV (<xref target="intro_definitions" format="default"/>), via RPCSEC_GSS and the SSV GSS
mechanism (<xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>), to protect state from attack.
The SP4_SSV protection option is intended for the situation
comprised of a client that has multiple active users and a system
administrator who wants to avoid the burden of installing a permanent
machine credential on each client. The SSV is
established and updated on the server via SET_SSV (see <xref target="OP_SET_SSV" format="default"/>). To prevent eavesdropping,
a client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send SET_SSV via RPCSEC_GSS with
the privacy service. Several aspects of the SSV
make it intractable for an attacker to guess the SSV,
and thus associate rogue connections with a session,
and rogue sessions with a client ID:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The arguments to and results of SET_SSV include digests of the old and
new SSV, respectively.
</li>
<li>
Because the initial value of the SSV is zero,
therefore known, the client that opts for SP4_SSV
protection and opts to apply SP4_SSV protection to
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION and CREATE_SESSION <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send
at least one SET_SSV operation before the first
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION operation or before the second
CREATE_SESSION operation on a client ID. If it does
not, the SSV mechanism will not generate tokens
(<xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>).
A client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send SET_SSV as soon as a session
is created.
</li>
<li>
A SET_SSV request does not replace the SSV with the argument to
SET_SSV. Instead, the current SSV on the server is logically
exclusive ORed (XORed) with the argument to SET_SSV.
Each time a new principal uses a client ID for the first
time, the client
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send a SET_SSV with that principal's RPCSEC_GSS
credentials, with RPCSEC_GSS service set to RPC_GSS_SVC_PRIVACY.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Here are the types of attacks that can be attempted by an attacker named
Eve on a victim named Bob, and how SP4_SSV protection foils
each attack:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Suppose Eve is the first user to log into a
legitimate client. Eve's use of an NFSv4.1
file system will cause the legitimate client to
create a client ID
with SP4_SSV protection, specifying that the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION
operation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the SSV credential. Eve's use of
the file system also causes an SSV to be created. The
SET_SSV operation that creates the SSV will be protected by
the RPCSEC_GSS context created by the legitimate
client, which uses Eve's GSS principal and
credentials. Eve can eavesdrop on the network while
her RPCSEC_GSS context is created and the SET_SSV
using her context is sent. Even if the legitimate
client sends the SET_SSV with RPC_GSS_SVC_PRIVACY,
because Eve knows her own credentials, she can
decrypt the SSV. Eve can compute an RPCSEC_GSS
credential that BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION will accept,
and so associate a new connection with the
legitimate session. Eve can change the slot ID and
sequence state of a legitimate session, and/or the
SSV state, in such a way that when Bob accesses
the server via the same legitimate client, the
legitimate client will be unable to use the session.
</t>
<t>
The client's only recourse is to create a new client
ID for Bob to use, and establish a new SSV for the
client ID. The client will be unable to delete
the old client ID, and will let the lease on the old
client ID expire.
</t>
<t>
Once the legitimate client establishes an SSV over
the new session using Bob's RPCSEC_GSS context,
Eve can use the new session via the legitimate
client, but she cannot disrupt Bob. Moreover,
because the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> have modified the SSV
due to Eve using the new session, Bob cannot get
revenge on Eve by associating a rogue connection
with the session.
</t>
<t>
The question is how did the legitimate client detect
that Eve has hijacked the old session? When the
client detects that a new principal, Bob, wants to
use the session, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> have sent a SET_SSV,
which leads to the following sub-scenarios:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Let us suppose that from the rogue connection, Eve
sent a SET_SSV with the same slot ID and sequence ID that
the legitimate client later uses. The server will
assume the SET_SSV sent with Bob's credentials is a retry,
and return to the legitimate
client the reply it sent Eve. However, unless Eve can
correctly guess the SSV the legitimate client will use,
the digest verification checks in the SET_SSV response
will fail. That is an indication to the client that the
session has apparently been hijacked.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Alternatively, Eve sent a SET_SSV with a different slot ID than
the legitimate client uses for its SET_SSV. Then the digest
verification of the SET_SSV sent with Bob's credentials fails
on the server, and the error returned to the client makes it
apparent that the session has been hijacked.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Alternatively, Eve sent an operation other than SET_SSV,
but with the same slot ID and sequence that the legitimate client
uses for its SET_SSV. The server returns to the legitimate
client the response it sent Eve. The client sees that the
response is not at all what it expects. The client
assumes either session hijacking or a server bug, and either way
destroys the old session.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Eve associates a rogue connection with the session
as above, and then destroys the session. Again, Bob
goes to use the server from the legitimate client,
which sends a SET_SSV using Bob's credentials. The client receives an error
that indicates that the session does not exist. When
the client tries to create a new session, this
will fail because the SSV it has does not match that which the
server has, and now the client knows the session
was hijacked. The legitimate client establishes a
new client ID.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
If Eve creates a connection before the legitimate
client establishes an SSV, because the initial
value of the SSV is zero and therefore known,
Eve can send a SET_SSV that will pass the digest
verification check. However, because the new
connection has not been associated with the session,
the SET_SSV is rejected for that reason.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In summary, an attacker's disruption of state when
SP4_SSV protection is in use is limited to the
formative period of a client ID, its first session,
and the establishment of the SSV. Once a non-malicious
user uses the client ID, the client quickly detects
any hijack and rectifies the situation. Once a
non-malicious user successfully modifies the SSV,
the attacker cannot use NFSv4.1 operations to disrupt
the non-malicious user.
</t>
<t>
Note that neither the SP4_MACH_CRED nor
SP4_SSV protection approaches prevent hijacking
of a transport connection that has previously been
associated with a session. If the goal of a counter-threat
strategy is to prevent connection hijacking, the use of IPsec is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>.
</t>
<t>
If a connection hijack occurs, the hijacker could in
theory change locking state and negatively impact the
service to legitimate clients. However, if the server
is configured to require the use of RPCSEC_GSS with
integrity or privacy on the affected file objects, and
if EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID capability (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) is in force, this will
thwart unauthorized attempts to change locking state.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Protection from Unauthorized State Changes -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Sessions Security -->
<section anchor="ssv_mech" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The Secret State Verifier (SSV) GSS Mechanism</name>
<t>
The SSV provides the secret key for a GSS mechanism internal to NFSv4.1
that NFSv4.1 uses for state protection. Contexts for this
mechanism are not established via the RPCSEC_GSS
protocol. Instead, the contexts are automatically
created when EXCHANGE_ID specifies
SP4_SSV protection. The only tokens
defined are the PerMsgToken (emitted by GSS_GetMIC)
and the SealedMessage token (emitted by GSS_Wrap).
</t>
<t>
The mechanism OID for the SSV mechanism is
iso.org.dod.internet.private.enterprise.Michael
Eisler.nfs.ssv_mech (1.3.6.1.4.1.28882.1.1). While the
SSV mechanism does not define any initial context
tokens, the OID can be used to let servers indicate
that the SSV mechanism is acceptable whenever the
client sends a SECINFO or SECINFO_NO_NAME operation
(see
<xref target="Security_Service_Negotiation" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The SSV mechanism defines four subkeys derived from
the SSV value. Each time SET_SSV is invoked, the subkeys
are recalculated by the client and server. The
calculation of each of the four subkeys depends on each
of the four respective ssv_subkey4 enumerated values. The calculation
uses the HMAC
<xref target="RFC2104" format="default"/> algorithm, using the current SSV as the key, the one-way hash
algorithm as negotiated by EXCHANGE_ID,
and the input text as represented by the XDR encoded
enumeration value for that subkey of data type ssv_subkey4.
If the length of the output of the HMAC algorithm exceeds the length of
key of the encryption algorithm (which is also negotiated by EXCHANGE_ID),
then the subkey <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be truncated from the HMAC output, i.e., if the
subkey is of N bytes long, then the first N bytes of the HMAC output
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used for the subkey. The specification of EXCHANGE_ID
states that the length of the output of the HMAC algorithm <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
be less than the length of subkey needed for the encryption algorithm
(see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>).
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* Input for computing subkeys */
enum ssv_subkey4 {
SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_I2T = 1,
SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_T2I = 2,
SSV4_SUBKEY_SEAL_I2T = 3,
SSV4_SUBKEY_SEAL_T2I = 4
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The subkey derived from SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_I2T
is used for calculating message integrity codes (MICs)
that originate from the NFSv4.1 client, whether as part
of a request over the fore channel or a response
over the backchannel. The subkey derived from
SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_T2I is used for MICs originating from the
NFSv4.1 server. The subkey derived from SSV4_SUBKEY_SEAL_I2T
is used for encryption text originating from the NFSv4.1
client, and the subkey derived from SSV4_SUBKEY_SEAL_T2I
is used for encryption text originating from the
NFSv4.1 server.
</t>
<t>
The PerMsgToken description is based on an XDR definition:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* Input for computing smt_hmac */
struct ssv_mic_plain_tkn4 {
uint32_t smpt_ssv_seq;
opaque smpt_orig_plain<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* SSV GSS PerMsgToken token */
struct ssv_mic_tkn4 {
uint32_t smt_ssv_seq;
opaque smt_hmac<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The field smt_hmac is an HMAC calculated by using the
subkey derived from SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_I2T or
SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_T2I as the key, the one-way hash algorithm
as negotiated by EXCHANGE_ID, and the input text
as represented by data of type ssv_mic_plain_tkn4.
The field smpt_ssv_seq is the same as smt_ssv_seq.
The field smpt_orig_plain is the "message" input passed
to GSS_GetMIC() (see <xref target="RFC2743" sectionFormat="of" section="2.3.1"/>).
The caller of GSS_GetMIC() provides a pointer to a buffer
containing the plain text. The SSV mechanism's entry point for
GSS_GetMIC() encodes this into an opaque array, and the encoding
will include an initial four-byte length, plus any necessary padding.
Prepended to this will be the XDR encoded value of smpt_ssv_seq,
thus making up an XDR encoding of a value of data type
ssv_mic_plain_tkn4, which in turn is the input into the HMAC.
</t>
<t>
The token emitted by GSS_GetMIC() is XDR encoded and
of XDR data type ssv_mic_tkn4. The field smt_ssv_seq
comes from the SSV sequence number, which is equal to
one after SET_SSV (<xref target="OP_SET_SSV" format="default"/>)
is called the first time on a client
ID.
Thereafter, the SSV sequence number is incremented on each SET_SSV.
Thus, smt_ssv_seq represents the version of the SSV at
the time GSS_GetMIC() was called. As noted in <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>, the client and server
can maintain multiple concurrent versions of the SSV.
This allows the SSV to be changed without serializing
all RPC calls that use the SSV mechanism with SET_SSV
operations.
Once the HMAC is calculated, it is XDR encoded into
smt_hmac, which will include an initial four-byte length,
and any necessary padding. Prepended to this will be
the XDR encoded value of smt_ssv_seq.
</t>
<t>
The SealedMessage description is based on an XDR definition:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* Input for computing ssct_encr_data and ssct_hmac */
struct ssv_seal_plain_tkn4 {
opaque sspt_confounder<>;
uint32_t sspt_ssv_seq;
opaque sspt_orig_plain<>;
opaque sspt_pad<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* SSV GSS SealedMessage token */
struct ssv_seal_cipher_tkn4 {
uint32_t ssct_ssv_seq;
opaque ssct_iv<>;
opaque ssct_encr_data<>;
opaque ssct_hmac<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The token emitted by GSS_Wrap() is XDR encoded and
of XDR data type ssv_seal_cipher_tkn4.
</t>
<t>
The ssct_ssv_seq field has the same meaning as smt_ssv_seq.
</t>
<t>
The ssct_encr_data field is the result of encrypting a
value of the XDR encoded data type ssv_seal_plain_tkn4.
The encryption key is the subkey derived from SSV4_SUBKEY_SEAL_I2T
or SSV4_SUBKEY_SEAL_T2I, and the encryption
algorithm is that negotiated by EXCHANGE_ID.
</t>
<t>
The ssct_iv field is the initialization vector (IV)
for the encryption algorithm (if applicable) and is
sent in clear text. The content and size of the IV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
comply with the specification of the encryption algorithm.
For example, the id-aes256-CBC algorithm <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use
a 16-byte initialization vector (IV), which <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
unpredictable for each instance of a value of data type
ssv_seal_plain_tkn4 that is encrypted with a particular
SSV key.
</t>
<t>
The ssct_hmac field is the result of computing an HMAC using the value
of the XDR encoded data type ssv_seal_plain_tkn4 as the input
text. The key is the subkey derived from SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_I2T or
SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_T2I, and the one-way hash algorithm is that
negotiated by EXCHANGE_ID.
</t>
<t>
The sspt_confounder field is a random value.
</t>
<t>
The sspt_ssv_seq field is the same as ssvt_ssv_seq.
</t>
<t>
The field sspt_orig_plain field is the original plaintext
and is the "input_message" input passed to
GSS_Wrap() (see <xref target="RFC2743" sectionFormat="of" section="2.3.3"/>).
As with the handling of the plaintext by the SSV mechanism's
GSS_GetMIC() entry point, the entry point for GSS_Wrap()
expects a pointer to the plaintext, and will XDR encode
an opaque array into sspt_orig_plain
representing the plain text, along with
the other fields of an instance of data type ssv_seal_plain_tkn4.
</t>
<t>
The sspt_pad field is present to support encryption
algorithms that require inputs to be in fixed-sized
blocks. The content of sspt_pad is zero filled
except for the length. Beware that the XDR encoding
of ssv_seal_plain_tkn4 contains three variable-length
arrays, and so each array consumes four bytes for an
array length, and each array that follows the length
is always padded to a multiple of four bytes per the
XDR standard.
</t>
<t>
For example, suppose the encryption algorithm uses 16-byte blocks, and
the sspt_confounder is three bytes long, and
the sspt_orig_plain field is 15 bytes long.
The XDR encoding of sspt_confounder uses eight bytes
(4 + 3 + 1-byte pad),
the XDR encoding of sspt_ssv_seq uses four bytes,
the XDR encoding of sspt_orig_plain uses 20 bytes
(4 + 15 + 1-byte pad),
and the smallest XDR encoding of the sspt_pad field
is four bytes.
This totals 36 bytes. The next multiple of 16 is 48;
thus, the length field of sspt_pad needs to be set to
12 bytes, or a total encoding of 16 bytes.
The total number of XDR encoded bytes is thus 8 +
4 + 20 + 16 = 48.
</t>
<t>
GSS_Wrap() emits a token that is an XDR
encoding of a value of data type ssv_seal_cipher_tkn4.
Note that regardless of whether or not the caller of GSS_Wrap()
requests confidentiality, the token always has
confidentiality. This is because the SSV mechanism
is for RPCSEC_GSS, and RPCSEC_GSS never produces
GSS_wrap() tokens without confidentiality.
</t>
<t>
There is one SSV per client ID.
There is a single GSS context for
a client ID / SSV pair.
All SSV mechanism RPCSEC_GSS handles of a client ID / SSV pair
share the same GSS context.
SSV GSS contexts do not expire except when the SSV
is destroyed (causes would include the client ID
being destroyed or a server restart).
Since one
purpose of context expiration is to replace keys that
have been in use for "too long", hence vulnerable to
compromise by brute force or accident, the client can
replace the SSV key by
sending periodic SET_SSV operations, which is done by cycling through
different users' RPCSEC_GSS credentials. This way, the SSV is
replaced without destroying the SSV's GSS contexts.
</t>
<t>
SSV RPCSEC_GSS handles can be expired or deleted by the server
at any time, and the EXCHANGE_ID operation can be used to create
more SSV RPCSEC_GSS handles. Expiration of SSV RPCSEC_GSS handles
does not imply that the SSV or its GSS context has expired.
</t>
<t>
The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> establish an SSV via SET_SSV before the
SSV GSS context can be used to emit tokens from GSS_Wrap()
and GSS_GetMIC(). If SET_SSV has not been successfully
called, attempts to emit tokens <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> fail.
</t>
<t>
The SSV mechanism does not support replay detection and sequencing
in its tokens because RPCSEC_GSS does not use those features (see
"Context Creation Requests", <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="of" section="5.2.2"/>). However, <xref target="rpcsec_ssv_consider" format="default"/> discusses special
considerations for the SSV mechanism when used with RPCSEC_GSS.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] The SSV GSS Mechanism -->
<section anchor="rpcsec_ssv_consider" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Considerations for RPCSEC_GSS When Using the SSV Mechanism</name>
<t>
When a client ID is created with SP4_SSV state protection (see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>), the client is permitted to associate
multiple RPCSEC_GSS handles with the single SSV GSS context
(see <xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>). Because of the way RPCSEC_GSS
(both version 1 and version 2, see <xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/> and
<xref target="RFC5403" format="default"/>) calculate the verifier of the reply,
special care must be taken by the implementation of the NFSv4.1
client to prevent attacks by a man-in-the-middle. The verifier
of an RPCSEC_GSS reply is the output of GSS_GetMIC() applied to
the input value of the seq_num field of the RPCSEC_GSS credential
(data type rpc_gss_cred_ver_1_t) (see <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="of" section="5.3.3.2"/>). If multiple RPCSEC_GSS handles share
the same
GSS context, then if one handle is used to send a request with the
same seq_num value as another handle, an attacker could block the
reply, and replace it with the verifier used for the other handle.
</t>
<t>
There are multiple ways to prevent the attack on the SSV RPCSEC_GSS
verifier in the reply. The simplest is believed to be as follows.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Each time one or more new SSV RPCSEC_GSS handles are created via
EXCHANGE_ID, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send a SET_SSV operation to modify
the SSV. By changing the SSV, the new handles will not result in the
re-use of an SSV RPCSEC_GSS verifier in a reply.
</li>
<li>
When a requester decides to use N SSV RPCSEC_GSS handles, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
assign a unique and non-overlapping range of seq_nums to each SSV
RPCSEC_GSS handle. The size of each range <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be equal to MAXSEQ
/ N (see <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="of" section="5"/> for the definition
of MAXSEQ). When an SSV RPCSEC_GSS handle reaches its maximum, it
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> force the replier to destroy the handle by sending a NULL
RPC request with seq_num set to MAXSEQ + 1 (see
<xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="of" section="5.3.3.3"/>).
</li>
<li>
When the requester wants to increase or decrease N, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> force
the replier to destroy all N handles by sending a NULL RPC request on
each handle with seq_num set to MAXSEQ + 1. If the requester is the
client, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send a SET_SSV operation before using new handles.
If the requester is the server, then the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send a SET_SSV
operation when it detects that the server has forced it to destroy a
backchannel's SSV RPCSEC_GSS handle. By sending a SET_SSV operation,
the SSV will change, and so the attacker will be unavailable to
successfully replay a previous verifier in a reply to the requester.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that if the replier carefully creates the SSV RPCSEC_GSS
handles, the related risk of a man-in-the-middle splicing a forged
SSV RPCSEC_GSS credential with a verifier for another handle does
not exist. This is because the verifier in an RPCSEC_GSS request
is computed from input that includes both the RPCSEC_GSS handle and
seq_num (see <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="of" section="5.3.1"/>). Provided the
replier takes care to avoid re-using the value of an RPCSEC_GSS
handle that it creates, such as by including a generation number in the
handle, the man-in-the-middle will not be able to successfully replay
a previous verifier in the request to a replier.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="Session_Mechanics_Steady_State" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Session Mechanics - Steady State</name>
<section anchor="Obligations_of_the_Server" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Obligations of the Server</name>
<t>
The server has the primary obligation to monitor the
state of backchannel resources that the client has
created for the server (RPCSEC_GSS contexts and backchannel
connections). If these resources vanish, the
server takes action as specified in <xref target="Events_Requiring_Server_Action" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Obligations of the Server -->
<section anchor="Obligations_of_the_Client" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Obligations of the Client</name>
<t>
The client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> honor the following obligations in order to
utilize the session:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Keep a necessary session from going idle on the server. A client
that requires a session but nonetheless is not
sending operations risks having the session be destroyed
by the server. This is because sessions consume
resources, and resource limitations may force the
server to cull an inactive session. A server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> consider
a session to be inactive if the client has not used
the session before the session inactivity timer (<xref target="session_inactive" format="default"/>) has expired.
</li>
<li>
Destroy the session when not needed. If a client has
multiple sessions, one of which has no
requests waiting for replies, and has been idle for
some period of time, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> destroy the session.
</li>
<li>
Maintain GSS contexts and RPCSEC_GSS handles
for the backchannel. If the client
requires the server to use the RPCSEC_GSS security
flavor for callbacks, then it needs to be sure the
RPCSEC_GSS handles and/or their GSS
contexts that are handed to the server via BACKCHANNEL_CTL or
CREATE_SESSION are unexpired.
</li>
<li>
Preserve a connection for a backchannel. The server
requires a backchannel in order to gracefully recall
recallable state or notify the client of certain
events. Note that if the connection is not being used
for the fore channel, there is no way for the client to tell
if the connection is still alive (e.g., the server
restarted without sending a disconnect). The onus is
on the server, not the client, to determine if the
backchannel's connection is alive, and to indicate in
the response to a SEQUENCE operation when the last
connection associated with a session's backchannel
has disconnected.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Obligations of the Client -->
<section anchor="Steps_the_Client_Takes_To_Establish_a_Session" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Steps the Client Takes to Establish a Session</name>
<t>
If the client does not have a client ID, the client
sends EXCHANGE_ID to establish a client ID. If it
opts for SP4_MACH_CRED or SP4_SSV protection, in the
spo_must_enforce list of operations, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> at
minimum specify CREATE_SESSION, DESTROY_SESSION,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, BACKCHANNEL_CTL, and DESTROY_CLIENTID.
If it opts for SP4_SSV protection, the client needs to
ask for SSV-based RPCSEC_GSS handles.
</t>
<t>
The client uses the client ID to send a
CREATE_SESSION on a connection to the server.
The results of CREATE_SESSION indicate whether or not the
server will persist the session reply cache through
a server that has restarted, and the client notes this
for future reference.
</t>
<t>
If the client specified SP4_SSV state protection
when the client ID was created, then it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send
SET_SSV in the first COMPOUND after the session is
created. Each time a new principal goes to use the
client ID, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send a SET_SSV again.
</t>
<t>
If the client wants to use delegations, layouts,
directory notifications, or any other state that
requires a backchannel, then it needs to add a connection
to the backchannel if CREATE_SESSION did not already
do so. The client creates a connection, and calls
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION to associate the connection
with the session and the session's backchannel. If
CREATE_SESSION did not already do so, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
tell the server what security is required in order
for the client to accept callbacks. The client does
this via BACKCHANNEL_CTL. If the client selected
SP4_MACH_CRED or SP4_SSV protection when it called
EXCHANGE_ID, then the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> specify that the
backchannel use RPCSEC_GSS contexts for security.
</t>
<t>
If the client wants to use additional
connections for the backchannel, then it needs to call
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION on each connection it wants to
use with the session. If the client wants to use
additional connections for the fore channel, then
it needs to call BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION if it specified
SP4_SSV or SP4_MACH_CRED state protection when the
client ID was created.
</t>
<t>
At this point, the session has reached steady state.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Steps the Client Takes To Establish a Session -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Session Mechanics - Steady State -->
<section anchor="session_inactive" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Session Inactivity Timer</name>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> maintain a session inactivity timer for
each session. If the session inactivity timer expires,
then the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> destroy the session. To avoid losing
a session due to inactivity, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> renew
the session inactivity timer. The length of session
inactivity timer <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be less than the lease_time
attribute (<xref target="attrdef_lease_time" format="default"/>).
As with lease renewal (<xref target="lease_renewal" format="default"/>),
when the server receives a SEQUENCE operation,
it resets the session inactivity timer, and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> allow the
timer to expire while the rest of the operations in the
COMPOUND procedure's request are still executing. Once the
last operation has finished, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the session
inactivity timer to expire no sooner than the sum of the
current time and the value of the lease_time attribute.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="Session_Mechanics_Recovery" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Session Mechanics - Recovery</name>
<section anchor="Events_Requiring_Client_Action" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Events Requiring Client Action</name>
<t>
The following events require client action to recover.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>RPCSEC_GSS Context Loss by Callback Path</name>
<t>
If all RPCSEC_GSS handles
granted by the client to the server for callback use have
expired, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
establish a new handle via BACKCHANNEL_CTL. The
sr_status_flags field of the SEQUENCE results indicates when callback handles
are nearly expired, or fully expired (see <xref target="OP_SEQUENCE_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] RPCSEC_GSS Context Loss by Callback_Path -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Connection Loss</name>
<t>
If the client loses the last connection of the session
and wants to retain the session, then it needs to
create a new connection, and if, when the client
ID was created, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION was specified
in the spo_must_enforce list, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION to associate the connection with
the session.
</t>
<t>
If there was a request outstanding at the time
of connection loss, then if the client wants to continue
to use the session, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> retry the request, as
described in
<xref target="Retry_and_Replay" format="default"/>. Note that it
is not necessary to retry requests over a connection
with the same source network address or the same
destination network address as the lost connection. As
long as the session ID, slot ID, and sequence ID in the
retry match that of the original request, the server
will recognize the request as a retry if it executed
the request prior to disconnect.
</t>
<t>
If the connection that was lost was the last one associated with
the backchannel, and the client wants to retain the backchannel and/or
prevent revocation of recallable state, the client needs to
reconnect, and if it does, it
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> associate the connection to the session and backchannel via
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION.
The server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> indicate when it has no callback connection
via the sr_status_flags result from SEQUENCE.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Connection Disconnect -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Backchannel GSS Context Loss</name>
<t>
Via the sr_status_flags result of the SEQUENCE operation or
other means, the client will learn if some or all of
the RPCSEC_GSS contexts it assigned to the backchannel have
been lost. If the client wants to retain the backchannel and/or
not put recallable state subject to revocation,
the client needs to use BACKCHANNEL_CTL to
assign new contexts.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Backchannel GSS Context Loss -->
<section anchor="loss_of_session" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Loss of Session</name>
<t>
The replier might lose a record of the session. Causes include:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Replier failure and restart.
</li>
<li>
A catastrophe that causes the reply cache to be corrupted or
lost on the media on which it was stored. This applies
even if the replier indicated in the CREATE_SESSION results
that it would persist the cache.
</li>
<li>
The server purges the session of a client that has been
inactive for a very extended period of time.
</li>
<li>
As a result of configuration changes among a set of clustered
servers, a network address previously connected to one
server becomes connected to a different server that has
no knowledge of the session in question. Such a configuration
change will generally only happen when the original server
ceases to function for a time.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Loss of reply cache is equivalent to loss of session.
The replier indicates loss of session to the requester
by returning NFS4ERR_BADSESSION on the next operation
that uses the session ID that refers to the lost
session.
</t>
<t>
After an event like a server restart, the client may have
lost its connections. The client assumes for the moment
that the session has not been lost. It reconnects, and
if it specified connection association enforcement when
the session was created, it
invokes BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION using the session ID. Otherwise,
it invokes SEQUENCE. If
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION or SEQUENCE returns NFS4ERR_BADSESSION, the
client knows the session is not available to it when communicating
with that network address. If the connection survives
session loss, then the next SEQUENCE operation the client
sends over the connection will get back NFS4ERR_BADSESSION.
The client again knows the session was lost.
</t>
<t>
Here is one suggested algorithm for the client when it gets
NFS4ERR_BADSESSION. It is not obligatory in that, if a
client does not want to take advantage of such features as
trunking, it may omit parts of it. However, it is a useful
example that draws attention to various possible recovery
issues:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
If the client has other connections to
other server network addresses
associated with the same session, attempt
a COMPOUND with a single operation, SEQUENCE,
on each of the other connections.
</li>
<li>
If the attempts succeed, the session is still alive,
and this is a strong indicator that the server's
network address has moved.
The client might send an EXCHANGE_ID on the
connection that returned NFS4ERR_BADSESSION
to see if there are opportunities for client ID
trunking (i.e., the same client ID and so_major_id value
are
returned). The client might use DNS to see if
the moved network address was replaced with another,
so that the performance and availability benefits of
session trunking can continue.
</li>
<li>
If the SEQUENCE requests fail with NFS4ERR_BADSESSION,
then the session no longer exists on any of the
server network addresses for which the client has connections
associated with that session ID. It is possible the
session is still alive and available on other
network addresses. The client sends an EXCHANGE_ID
on all the connections to see if the server owner
is still listening on those network addresses.
If the same server owner is returned but a new
client ID is returned, this is a strong
indicator of a server restart. If both the same
server owner and same client ID are
returned, then this is a strong indication
that the server did delete the session, and the
client will need to send a CREATE_SESSION if it
has no other sessions for that client ID.
If a different server owner is returned,
the client can use DNS to find
other network addresses. If it does not, or if
DNS does not find any other addresses for the server,
then the client will be unable to provide NFSv4.1
service, and fatal errors should be returned
to processes that were using the server. If the
client is using a "mount" paradigm, unmounting
the server is advised.
</li>
<li>
If the client knows of no other connections associated
with the session ID and server network addresses that
are, or have been, associated with the session ID,
then the client can use DNS to find
other network addresses. If it does not, or if
DNS does not find any other addresses for the server,
then the client will be unable to provide NFSv4.1
service, and fatal errors should be returned
to processes that were using the server. If the
client is using a "mount" paradigm, unmounting
the server is advised.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
If there is a reconfiguration event that results in the
same network address being assigned to servers where the
eir_server_scope value is different, it cannot be guaranteed
that a session ID generated by the first will be recognized
as invalid by the first. Therefore, in managing server
reconfigurations among servers with different server scope
values, it is necessary to make sure that all clients have
disconnected from the first server before effecting
the reconfiguration. Nonetheless, clients should not
assume that servers will always adhere to this requirement;
clients <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be prepared to deal with unexpected
effects of server reconfigurations.
Even where a session ID is inappropriately
recognized as valid, it is likely either that the connection
will not be recognized as valid or that a sequence value
for a slot will not be correct. Therefore, when a client
receives results indicating such unexpected errors, the use of
EXCHANGE_ID to determine the current server configuration
is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>.
</t>
<t>
A variation on the above is that after a server's network
address moves, there is no NFSv4.1 server listening, e.g., no
listener on port 2049. In this example, one of the following occur: the NFSv4 server returns
NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH, the NFS server returns a
PROG_MISMATCH error, the RPC listener on 2049 returns
PROG_UNVAIL, or attempts to reconnect to the network address
timeout. These <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be treated as equivalent to SEQUENCE
returning NFS4ERR_BADSESSION for these purposes.
</t>
<t>
When the client detects session loss, it needs to call CREATE_SESSION
to recover. Any non-idempotent operations that were in progress
might have been performed on the server at the time of
session loss. The client has no general way to recover from this.
</t>
<t>
Note that loss of session does not imply loss of byte-range lock, open, delegation,
or layout state because locks, opens, delegations, and layouts
are tied to the client ID and depend on the client ID, not the session.
Nor does loss of byte-range lock, open, delegation,
or layout state imply loss of session state, because the session depends
on the client ID; loss of client ID however does imply loss of
session, byte-range lock, open, delegation, and layout state.
See <xref target="server_failure" format="default"/>.
A session can survive a server restart,
but lock recovery may still be needed.
</t>
<t>
It is possible that CREATE_SESSION will fail with NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID
(e.g., the server restarts and does not preserve client ID
state).
If so, the client needs to call EXCHANGE_ID, followed by
CREATE_SESSION.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Loss of Session -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Events Requiring Client Action -->
<section anchor="Events_Requiring_Server_Action" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Events Requiring Server Action</name>
<t>
The following events require server action to recover.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Crash and Restart</name>
<t>
As described in <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>,
a restarted client sends EXCHANGE_ID in such a way that it
causes the server to delete any sessions it had.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Client Crash and Restart -->
<section anchor="client_crash_no_restart" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Crash with No Restart</name>
<t>
If a client crashes and never comes back, it will never send
EXCHANGE_ID with its old client owner. Thus, the server has session
state that will never be used again. After an extended period of time,
and if the server has resource constraints, it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> destroy the old
session as well as locking state.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Client Crash with No Restart -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Extended Network Partition</name>
<t>
To the server, the extended network partition may be no
different from a
client crash with no
restart (see
<xref target="client_crash_no_restart" format="default"/>).
Unless the server can discern that there is
a network partition, it is free to treat the
situation as if the client has crashed permanently.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Extended Network Partition" -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Backchannel Connection Loss</name>
<t>
If there were callback requests outstanding at the time
of a connection loss, then the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> retry the requests, as described in
<xref target="Retry_and_Replay" format="default"/>. Note that it
is not necessary to retry requests over a connection
with the same source network address or the same destination
network address as the lost connection. As long as
the session ID, slot ID, and sequence ID in the retry
match that of the original request, the callback target will
recognize the request as a retry even if it did see the request
prior to disconnect.
</t>
<t>
If the connection lost is the last one associated with the backchannel,
then the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> indicate that in the sr_status_flags field of
every SEQUENCE reply until the backchannel is re-established.
There are two situations, each of which uses different
status flags: no connectivity for the session's backchannel
and no connectivity for any session backchannel of the client.
See <xref target="OP_SEQUENCE" format="default"/> for a description of
the appropriate flags in sr_status_flags.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Backchannel Connection Loss -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>GSS Context Loss</name>
<t>
The server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> monitor when the number of RPCSEC_GSS
handles assigned to the backchannel reaches one, and when that
one handle is near expiry (i.e., between
one and two periods of lease time), and
indicate so in the sr_status_flags field of all SEQUENCE replies.
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> indicate when all of the
backchannel's assigned RPCSEC_GSS handles
have expired via the sr_status_flags field of all SEQUENCE replies.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] GSS Context Loss -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Events Requiring Server Action -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Session Mechanics - Recovery -->
<section anchor="pnfs_and_sessions" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Parallel NFS and Sessions</name>
<t>
A client and server can potentially be a non-pNFS implementation,
a metadata server implementation, a data server implementation, or two or
three types of implementations. The EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS,
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS, and EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS flags
(not mutually exclusive) are passed in the EXCHANGE_ID arguments
and results to allow the client to indicate how it wants to use sessions created
under the client ID, and to allow the server to indicate how it
will allow the sessions to be used.
See <xref target="pnfs_session_stuff" format="default"/> for pNFS sessions considerations.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Parallel NFS and Sessions -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Session -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] Core Infrastructure -->
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Protocol Constants and Data Types</name>
<t>
The syntax and semantics to describe the data types of the NFSv4.1
protocol are defined in the XDR (<xref target="RFC4506" format="default">RFC 4506</xref>) and RPC
(<xref target="RFC5531" format="default">RFC 5531</xref>) documents. The next sections
build upon the XDR data types to define constants, types, and structures
specific to this protocol. The full list of XDR data types is in <xref target="RFC5662" format="default"/>.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Basic Constants</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const NFS4_FHSIZE = 128;
const NFS4_VERIFIER_SIZE = 8;
const NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT = 1024;
const NFS4_SESSIONID_SIZE = 16;
const NFS4_INT64_MAX = 0x7fffffffffffffff;
const NFS4_UINT64_MAX = 0xffffffffffffffff;
const NFS4_INT32_MAX = 0x7fffffff;
const NFS4_UINT32_MAX = 0xffffffff;
const NFS4_MAXFILELEN = 0xffffffffffffffff;
const NFS4_MAXFILEOFF = 0xfffffffffffffffe;
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Except where noted, all these constants are defined in bytes.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
NFS4_FHSIZE is the maximum size of a filehandle.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_VERIFIER_SIZE is the fixed size of a verifier.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT is the maximum size of certain
opaque information.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_SESSIONID_SIZE is the fixed size of a session identifier.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_INT64_MAX is the maximum value of a signed 64-bit integer.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_UINT64_MAX is the maximum value of an unsigned 64-bit integer.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_INT32_MAX is the maximum value of a signed 32-bit integer.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_UINT32_MAX is the maximum value of an unsigned 32-bit integer.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_MAXFILELEN is the maximum length of a regular file.
</li>
<li>
NFS4_MAXFILEOFF is the maximum offset into a regular file.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Basic Data Types</name>
<t>
These are the base NFSv4.1 data types.
</t>
<table anchor="basic_data_types" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Data Type</th>
<th align="left">Definition</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">int32_t</td>
<td align="left">typedef int int32_t;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">typedef unsigned int uint32_t;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">int64_t</td>
<td align="left">typedef hyper int64_t;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">typedef unsigned hyper uint64_t;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">attrlist4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef opaque attrlist4&lt;&gt;;</t>
<t>Used for file/directory attributes.</t></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">bitmap4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint32_t bitmap4&lt;&gt;;</t>
<t>Used in attribute array encoding.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">changeid4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint64_t changeid4;</t>
<t>Used in the definition of change_info4.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">clientid4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint64_t clientid4;</t>
<t>Shorthand reference to client identification.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">count4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint32_t count4;</t>
<t>Various count parameters (READ, WRITE,
COMMIT).</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">length4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint64_t length4;</t>
<t>The length of a byte-range within a file.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">mode4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint32_t mode4;</t>
<t>Mode attribute data type.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">nfs_cookie4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint64_t nfs_cookie4;</t>
<t>Opaque cookie value for READDIR.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">nfs_fh4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef opaque nfs_fh4&lt;NFS4_FHSIZE&gt;;</t>
<t>Filehandle definition.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">nfs_ftype4</td>
<td align="left"><t>enum nfs_ftype4;</t>
<t>Various defined file types.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">nfsstat4</td>
<td align="left"><t>enum nfsstat4;</t>
<t>Return value for operations.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">offset4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint64_t offset4;</t>
<t>Various offset designations (READ, WRITE, LOCK, COMMIT).</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">qop4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint32_t qop4;</t>
<t>Quality of protection designation in SECINFO.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sec_oid4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef opaque sec_oid4&lt;&gt;;</t>
<t>Security Object Identifier. The sec_oid4 data type is not
really opaque. Instead, it contains an ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER
as used by GSS-API in the mech_type argument to
GSS_Init_sec_context. See <xref target="RFC2743"
format="default"/> for details.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sequenceid4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint32_t sequenceid4;</t>
<t>Sequence number used for various session operations
(EXCHANGE_ID, CREATE_SESSION, SEQUENCE, CB_SEQUENCE).</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">seqid4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint32_t seqid4;</t>
<t>Sequence identifier used for locking.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sessionid4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef opaque sessionid4[NFS4_SESSIONID_SIZE];</t>
<t>Session identifier.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">slotid4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef uint32_t slotid4;</t>
<t>Sequencing artifact for various session operations
(SEQUENCE, CB_SEQUENCE).</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">utf8string</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef opaque utf8string&lt;&gt;;</t>
<t>UTF-8 encoding for strings.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">utf8str_cis</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef utf8string utf8str_cis;</t>
<t>Case-insensitive UTF-8 string.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">utf8str_cs</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef utf8string utf8str_cs;</t>
<t>Case-sensitive UTF-8 string.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">utf8str_mixed</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef utf8string utf8str_mixed;</t>
<t>UTF-8 strings with a case-sensitive prefix and a
case-insensitive suffix.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">component4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef utf8str_cs component4;</t>
<t>Represents pathname components.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">linktext4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef utf8str_cs linktext4;</t>
<t>Symbolic link contents ("symbolic link" is defined in an
<xref target="symlink" format="default">Open Group</xref>
standard).</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">pathname4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef component4 pathname4&lt;&gt;;</t>
<t>Represents pathname for fs_locations.</t>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">verifier4</td>
<td align="left"><t>typedef opaque verifier4[NFS4_VERIFIER_SIZE];</t>
<t>Verifier used for various operations (COMMIT, CREATE,
EXCHANGE_ID, OPEN, READDIR, WRITE) NFS4_VERIFIER_SIZE is defined
as 8.</t>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>End of Base Data Types</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] start here for the structured data types -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Structured Data Types</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="nfstime4" numbered="true">
<name>nfstime4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct nfstime4 {
int64_t seconds;
uint32_t nseconds;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The nfstime4 data type gives the number of seconds and
nanoseconds since midnight or zero hour January 1, 1970
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). Values greater than zero
for the seconds field denote dates after the zero hour January 1,
1970. Values less than zero for the seconds field denote
dates before the zero hour January 1, 1970. In both cases, the
nseconds field is to be added to the seconds field for the
final time representation. For example, if the time to be
represented is one-half second before zero hour January 1, 1970,
the seconds field would have a value of negative one (-1) and
the nseconds field would have a value of one-half second
(500000000). Values greater than 999,999,999 for nseconds are
invalid.
</t>
<t>
This data type is used to pass time and date information. A
server converts to and from its local representation of time
when processing time values, preserving as much accuracy as
possible. If the precision of timestamps stored for a
file system object is less than defined, loss of precision can
occur. An adjunct time maintenance protocol is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to
reduce client and server time skew.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="time_how4" numbered="true">
<name>time_how4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum time_how4 {
SET_TO_SERVER_TIME4 = 0,
SET_TO_CLIENT_TIME4 = 1
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="settime4" numbered="true">
<name>settime4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union settime4 switch (time_how4 set_it) {
case SET_TO_CLIENT_TIME4:
nfstime4 time;
default:
void;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The time_how4 and settime4 data types are used
for setting timestamps in file object attributes. If set_it is SET_TO_SERVER_TIME4, then the server
uses its local representation of time for the time value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="specdata4" numbered="true">
<name>specdata4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct specdata4 {
uint32_t specdata1; /* major device number */
uint32_t specdata2; /* minor device number */
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This data type represents the device numbers for the device file
types NF4CHR and NF4BLK.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="fsid4" numbered="true">
<name>fsid4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct fsid4 {
uint64_t major;
uint64_t minor;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="chg_policy4" numbered="true">
<name>change_policy4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct change_policy4 {
uint64_t cp_major;
uint64_t cp_minor;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The change_policy4 data type is used for the change_policy
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attribute. It provides change sequencing indication
analogous to the change attribute. To enable the server to
present a value valid across server re-initialization without
requiring persistent storage, two 64-bit quantities are used,
allowing one to be a server instance ID and the second to be
incremented non-persistently, within a given server instance.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="fattr4" numbered="true">
<name>fattr4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct fattr4 {
bitmap4 attrmask;
attrlist4 attr_vals;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The fattr4 data type is used to represent file and directory attributes.
</t>
<t>
The bitmap is a counted array of 32-bit integers used to contain bit
values. The position of the integer in the array that contains bit n
can be computed from the expression (n / 32), and its bit within that
integer is (n mod 32).
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
0 1
+-----------+-----------+-----------+--
| count | 31 .. 0 | 63 .. 32 |
+-----------+-----------+-----------+--
]]></artwork>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="change_info4" numbered="true">
<name>change_info4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct change_info4 {
bool atomic;
changeid4 before;
changeid4 after;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This data type is used with the CREATE, LINK, OPEN, REMOVE, and RENAME
operations to let the client know the value of the change attribute
for the directory in which the target file system object resides.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="netaddr4" numbered="true">
<name>netaddr4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct netaddr4 {
/* see struct rpcb in RFC 1833 */
string na_r_netid<>; /* network id */
string na_r_addr<>; /* universal address */
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The netaddr4 data type is used to identify network transport endpoints.
The na_r_netid and na_r_addr fields respectively contain a netid
and uaddr. The netid and uaddr concepts are defined in
<xref target="RFC5665" format="default"/>. The netid and uaddr formats for
TCP over IPv4 and TCP over IPv6 are defined in <xref target="RFC5665" format="default"/>,
specifically Tables 2 and 3 and in
Sections <xref target="RFC5665" section="5.2.3.3" sectionFormat="bare"/> and <xref target="RFC5665" section="5.2.3.4" sectionFormat="bare"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="state_owner4" numbered="true">
<name>state_owner4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct state_owner4 {
clientid4 clientid;
opaque owner<NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT>;
};
typedef state_owner4 open_owner4;
typedef state_owner4 lock_owner4;
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The state_owner4 data type is the base type for the
open_owner4 (<xref target="open_owner4" format="default"/>) and
lock_owner4 (<xref target="lock_owner4" format="default"/>).
</t>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="open_owner4" numbered="true">
<name>open_owner4</name>
<t>
This data type is used to identify the owner of OPEN state.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="lock_owner4" numbered="true">
<name>lock_owner4</name>
<t>
This structure is used to identify the owner of byte-range
locking state.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="open_to_lock_owner4" numbered="true">
<name>open_to_lock_owner4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct open_to_lock_owner4 {
seqid4 open_seqid;
stateid4 open_stateid;
seqid4 lock_seqid;
lock_owner4 lock_owner;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This data type is used for the first LOCK operation done for
an open_owner4. It provides both the open_stateid and
lock_owner, such that the transition is made from a valid
open_stateid sequence to that of the new lock_stateid
sequence. Using this mechanism avoids the confirmation of the
lock_owner/lock_seqid pair since it is tied to established
state in the form of the open_stateid/open_seqid.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="stateid4" numbered="true">
<name>stateid4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct stateid4 {
uint32_t seqid;
opaque other[12];
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This data type is used for the various state sharing
mechanisms between the client and server. The client
never modifies a value of data type stateid.
The starting value of the
"seqid" field is undefined. The server is required to
increment the "seqid" field by one at each transition
of the stateid. This is important since the client will
inspect the seqid in OPEN stateids to determine the order of
OPEN processing done by the server.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="layouttype4" numbered="true">
<name>layouttype4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum layouttype4 {
LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES = 0x1,
LAYOUT4_OSD2_OBJECTS = 0x2,
LAYOUT4_BLOCK_VOLUME = 0x3
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This data type indicates what type of layout is being used.
The file server advertises the
layout types it supports through the fs_layout_type file
system attribute (<xref target="attrdef_fs_layout_type" format="default"/>).
A client asks for layouts of a particular type in LAYOUTGET,
and processes those layouts in its layout-type-specific logic.
</t>
<t>
The layouttype4 data type is 32 bits in length. The range
represented by the layout type is split into three parts. Type
0x0 is reserved. Types
within the range 0x00000001-0x7FFFFFFF are globally unique and
are assigned according to the description in <xref target="pnfsiana" format="default"/>; they are maintained by IANA. Types
within the range 0x80000000-0xFFFFFFFF are site specific and
for private use only.
</t>
<t>
The LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES enumeration specifies that the NFSv4.1
file layout type, as defined in <xref target="file_layout_type" format="default"/>, is to be used. The LAYOUT4_OSD2_OBJECTS
enumeration specifies that the object layout, as defined in
<xref target="RFC5664" format="default"/>, is to be used. Similarly,
the LAYOUT4_BLOCK_VOLUME enumeration specifies that the block/volume
layout, as defined in <xref target="RFC5663" format="default"/>, is to be
used.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="deviceid4" numbered="true">
<name>deviceid4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const NFS4_DEVICEID4_SIZE = 16;
typedef opaque deviceid4[NFS4_DEVICEID4_SIZE];
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Layout information includes device IDs that
specify a storage device through a compact handle.
Addressing and type information is obtained
with the GETDEVICEINFO operation. Device IDs
are not guaranteed to be valid across metadata
server restarts. A device ID is unique per client
ID and layout type. See <xref target="device_ids" format="default"/> for more details.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="device_addr4" numbered="true">
<name>device_addr4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct device_addr4 {
layouttype4 da_layout_type;
opaque da_addr_body<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The device address is used to set up a communication channel
with the storage device. Different layout types will require
different data types to define how they communicate
with storage devices. The opaque da_addr_body field is
interpreted based on the specified da_layout_type field.
</t>
<t>
This document defines the device address for the NFSv4.1 file
layout (see <xref target="file_data_types" format="default"/>), which
identifies a storage device by network IP address and port
number. This is sufficient for the clients to communicate
with the NFSv4.1 storage devices, and may be sufficient for
other layout types as well. Device types for object-based storage
devices and block storage devices (e.g., Small Computer System
Interface (SCSI) volume labels)
are defined by their respective layout specifications.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="layout_content4" numbered="true">
<name>layout_content4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct layout_content4 {
layouttype4 loc_type;
opaque loc_body<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The loc_body field is interpreted based on the layout type (loc_type).
This document defines the loc_body for the NFSv4.1
file layout type; see <xref target="file_data_types" format="default"/> for its definition.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="layout4" numbered="true">
<name>layout4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct layout4 {
offset4 lo_offset;
length4 lo_length;
layoutiomode4 lo_iomode;
layout_content4 lo_content;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The layout4 data type defines a layout for a file. The layout
type specific data is opaque within lo_content.
Since layouts are sub-dividable, the offset
and length together with the file's filehandle, the client ID,
iomode, and layout type identify the layout.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="layoutupdate4" numbered="true">
<name>layoutupdate4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct layoutupdate4 {
layouttype4 lou_type;
opaque lou_body<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The layoutupdate4 data type is used by the client to return
updated layout information to the metadata server via the
LAYOUTCOMMIT (<xref target="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT" format="default"/>) operation.
This data type provides a channel to pass
layout type specific information (in field lou_body)
back to the metadata server.
For example, for the block/volume layout type, this could include the
list of reserved blocks that were written. The contents of
the opaque lou_body argument are determined by the layout type.
The NFSv4.1 file-based layout
does not use this data type; if lou_type is LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES,
the lou_body field <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
have a zero length.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="layouthint4" numbered="true">
<name>layouthint4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct layouthint4 {
layouttype4 loh_type;
opaque loh_body<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The layouthint4 data type is used by the client to pass in a
hint about the type of layout it would like created for a particular
file. It is the data type specified by the layout_hint
attribute described in <xref target="attrdef_layout_hint" format="default"/>.
The metadata server may ignore the hint
or may selectively ignore fields within the hint. This hint should
be provided at create time as part of the initial attributes within
OPEN. The loh_body field is specific to the type of layout (loh_type).
The NFSv4.1 file-based layout uses the nfsv4_1_file_layouthint4
data type as defined in <xref target="file_data_types" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="layoutiomode4" numbered="true">
<name>layoutiomode4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum layoutiomode4 {
LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ = 1,
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW = 2,
LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY = 3
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The iomode specifies whether the client intends to just read or both
read and write the data represented by the
layout. While the LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY iomode <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used in
the arguments to the LAYOUTGET operation, it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
be used in the arguments to the LAYOUTRETURN and CB_LAYOUTRECALL
operations. The LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY iomode
specifies that layouts pertaining to both LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ
and LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW iomodes are being returned or recalled,
respectively. The metadata server's use of the iomode may
depend on the layout type being used. The storage devices <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
validate I/O accesses against the iomode and reject invalid accesses.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="nfs_impl_id4" numbered="true">
<name>nfs_impl_id4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct nfs_impl_id4 {
utf8str_cis nii_domain;
utf8str_cs nii_name;
nfstime4 nii_date;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This data type is used to identify client and server
implementation details. The nii_domain field is the DNS domain
name with which the implementor is associated. The nii_name
field is the product name of the implementation and is
completely free form. It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that the nii_name be
used to distinguish machine architecture, machine platforms,
revisions, versions, and patch levels. The nii_date field is
the timestamp of when the software instance was published or
built.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="threshold_item4" numbered="true">
<name>threshold_item4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct threshold_item4 {
layouttype4 thi_layout_type;
bitmap4 thi_hintset;
opaque thi_hintlist<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This data type contains a list of hints specific to
a layout type for helping the client determine when
it should send I/O directly through the metadata
server versus the storage devices. The data type
consists of the layout type (thi_layout_type),
a bitmap (thi_hintset) describing the set of
hints supported by the server (they may differ
based on the layout type), and a list of hints
(thi_hintlist) whose content is determined by
the hintset bitmap. See the mdsthreshold attribute
for more details.
</t>
<t>
The thi_hintset field is a bitmap of the following values:
</t>
<table align="center" anchor="table2">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">name</th>
<th align="left">#</th>
<th align="left">Data Type</th>
<th align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">threshold4_read_size</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">length4</td>
<td align="left">
If a file's length is less than the value of threshold4_read_size,
then it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that the client read from the file via the MDS and not
a storage device.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">threshold4_write_size</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">length4</td>
<td align="left">
If a file's length is less than the value of threshold4_write_size,
then it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that the client write to the file via the MDS and not
a storage device.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">threshold4_read_iosize</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">length4</td>
<td align="left">
For read I/O sizes below this threshold, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to
read data through the MDS.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">threshold4_write_iosize</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">length4</td>
<td align="left">
For write I/O sizes below this threshold, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to
write data through the MDS.
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="mdsthreshold4" numbered="true">
<name>mdsthreshold4</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct mdsthreshold4 {
threshold_item4 mth_hints<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This data type holds an array of elements of data type
threshold_item4,
each of which is valid for a particular layout type. An array
is necessary because a server can support multiple layout types
for a single file.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] End of Data Types -->
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="Filehandles" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Filehandles</name>
<t>
The filehandle in the NFS protocol is a per-server unique identifier
for a file system object. The contents of the filehandle are opaque
to the client. Therefore, the server is responsible for translating
the filehandle to an internal representation of the file system
object.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Obtaining the First Filehandle</name>
<t>
The operations of the NFS protocol are defined in terms of one
or more filehandles. Therefore, the client needs a filehandle
to initiate communication with the server. With the NFSv3
protocol (<xref target="RFC1813" format="default">RFC 1813</xref>), there
exists an ancillary protocol to obtain this first filehandle.
The MOUNT protocol, RPC program number 100005, provides the
mechanism of translating a string-based file system pathname to
a filehandle, which can then be used by the NFS protocols.
</t>
<t>
The MOUNT protocol has deficiencies in the area of security and
use via firewalls. This is one reason that the use of the
public filehandle was introduced in <xref target="RFC2054" format="default">RFC 2054</xref> and <xref target="RFC2055" format="default">RFC 2055</xref>. With the use of the public
filehandle in combination with the LOOKUP operation in the NFSv3
protocol, it has been demonstrated that the
MOUNT protocol is unnecessary for viable interaction between NFS
client and server.
</t>
<t>
Therefore, the NFSv4.1 protocol will not use an ancillary
protocol for translation from string-based pathnames to a filehandle.
Two special filehandles will be used as starting points for the NFS
client.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Root Filehandle</name>
<t>
The first of the special filehandles is the ROOT filehandle. The ROOT
filehandle is the "conceptual" root of the file system namespace at
the NFS server. The client uses or starts with the ROOT filehandle
by employing the PUTROOTFH operation. The PUTROOTFH operation
instructs the server to set the "current" filehandle to the ROOT of
the server's file tree. Once this PUTROOTFH operation is used, the
client can then traverse the entirety of the server's file tree with
the LOOKUP operation. A complete discussion of the server namespace
is in <xref target="single_server_namespace" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Public Filehandle</name>
<t>
The second special filehandle is the PUBLIC filehandle. Unlike the
ROOT filehandle, the PUBLIC filehandle may be bound or represent an
arbitrary file system object at the server. The server is responsible
for this binding. It may be that the PUBLIC filehandle and the ROOT
filehandle refer to the same file system object. However, it is up to
the administrative software at the server and the policies of the
server administrator to define the binding of the PUBLIC filehandle
and server file system object. The client may not make any
assumptions about this binding. The client uses the PUBLIC filehandle
via the PUTPUBFH operation.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Filehandle Types</name>
<t>
In the NFSv3 protocol, there was one type of filehandle
with a single set of semantics. This type of filehandle is termed
"persistent" in NFSv4.1. The semantics of a persistent
filehandle remain the same as before. A new type of filehandle
introduced in NFSv4.1 is the "volatile" filehandle, which
attempts to accommodate certain server environments.
</t>
<t>
The volatile filehandle type was introduced to address server
functionality or implementation issues that make correct
implementation of a persistent filehandle infeasible. Some server
environments do not provide a file-system-level invariant that can be
used to construct a persistent filehandle. The underlying server
file system may not provide the invariant or the server's file system
programming interfaces may not provide access to the needed invariant.
Volatile filehandles may ease the implementation of server
functionality such as hierarchical storage management or file system
reorganization or migration. However, the volatile filehandle
increases the implementation burden for the client.
</t>
<t>
Since the client will need to handle persistent and volatile
filehandles differently, a file attribute is defined that may be used
by the client to determine the filehandle types being returned by the
server.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>General Properties of a Filehandle</name>
<t>
The filehandle contains all the information the
server needs to distinguish an individual file.
To the client, the filehandle is opaque. The
client stores filehandles for use in a later
request and can compare two filehandles from the
same server for equality by doing a byte-by-byte
comparison. However, the client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> otherwise
interpret the contents of filehandles. If two
filehandles from the same server are equal, they
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> refer to the same file. Servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> try
to maintain a one-to-one correspondence between
filehandles and files, but this is not required.
Clients <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use filehandle comparisons only to
improve performance, not for correct behavior.
All clients need to be prepared for situations
in which it cannot be determined whether two
filehandles denote the same object and in such
cases, avoid making invalid assumptions that might
cause incorrect behavior. Further discussion
of filehandle and attribute comparison in the
context of data caching is presented in <xref target="data_caching_and_file_identity" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
As an example, in the case that two different pathnames when
traversed at the server terminate at the same file system object, the
server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return the same filehandle for each path. This can
occur if a hard link (see <xref target="hardlink" format="default"/>) is used
to create two file names that refer to the same underlying
file object and associated data. For example, if paths /a/b/c
and /a/d/c refer to the same file, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return
the same filehandle for both pathnames' traversals.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Persistent Filehandle</name>
<t>
A persistent filehandle is defined as having a fixed value for the
lifetime of the file system object to which it refers. Once the
server creates the filehandle for a file system object, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> accept the same filehandle for the object for the lifetime of the
object. If the server restarts, the NFS server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> honor
the same filehandle value as it did in the server's previous
instantiation. Similarly, if the file system is migrated, the new NFS
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> honor the same filehandle as the old NFS server.
</t>
<t>
The persistent filehandle will be become stale or invalid when the
file system object is removed. When the server is presented with a
persistent filehandle that refers to a deleted object, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
an error of NFS4ERR_STALE. A filehandle may become stale when the
file system containing the object is no longer available. The file
system may become unavailable if it exists on removable media and the
media is no longer available at the server or the file system in whole
has been destroyed or the file system has simply been removed from the
server's namespace (i.e., unmounted in a UNIX environment).
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Volatile Filehandle</name>
<t>
A volatile filehandle does not share the same longevity
characteristics of a persistent filehandle. The server may
determine that a volatile filehandle is no longer valid at many
different points in time. If the server can definitively determine
that a volatile filehandle refers to an object that has been removed,
the server should return NFS4ERR_STALE to the client (as is the case
for persistent filehandles). In all other cases where the server
determines that a volatile filehandle can no longer be used, it should
return an error of NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED.
</t>
<t>
The <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attribute "fh_expire_type" is used by the client to
determine what type of filehandle the server is providing for a
particular file system. This attribute is a bitmask with the
following values:
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>FH4_PERSISTENT</dt>
<dd>
The value of FH4_PERSISTENT is used to indicate a persistent
filehandle, which is valid until the object is removed from the
file system. The server will not return NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED for this
filehandle. FH4_PERSISTENT is defined as a value in which none of the
bits specified below are set.
</dd>
<dt>FH4_VOLATILE_ANY</dt>
<dd>
The filehandle may expire at any time, except as specifically
excluded (i.e., FH4_NO_EXPIRE_WITH_OPEN).
</dd>
<dt>FH4_NOEXPIRE_WITH_OPEN</dt>
<dd>
May only be set when FH4_VOLATILE_ANY is set. If this bit is set,
then the meaning of FH4_VOLATILE_ANY is qualified to exclude any
expiration of the filehandle when it is open.
</dd>
<dt>FH4_VOL_MIGRATION</dt>
<dd>
The filehandle will expire as a result of a file system
transition (migration or replication), in those cases in
which the continuity of filehandle use is not specified by
handle class information
within the fs_locations_info attribute. When this bit is
set, clients without access to fs_locations_info
information should assume that filehandles will expire on file
system transitions.
</dd>
<dt>FH4_VOL_RENAME</dt>
<dd>
The filehandle will expire during rename. This includes a rename by
the requesting client or a rename by any other client. If FH4_VOL_ANY
is set, FH4_VOL_RENAME is redundant.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
Servers that provide volatile filehandles that can expire
while open require special care as regards handling of RENAMEs
and REMOVEs. This situation can arise if FH4_VOL_MIGRATION or
FH4_VOL_RENAME is set, if FH4_VOLATILE_ANY is set and
FH4_NOEXPIRE_WITH_OPEN is not set, or if a non-read-only file system
has a transition target in a different handle
class. In these cases, the server should deny a RENAME
or REMOVE that would affect an OPEN file of any of the
components leading to the OPEN file. In addition, the server
should deny all RENAME or REMOVE requests during the grace period,
in order to make sure that reclaims of files where filehandles
may have expired do not do a reclaim for the wrong file.
</t>
<t>
Volatile filehandles are especially suitable for implementation
of the pseudo file systems used to bridge exports. See
<xref target="pseudo_fs_volatility" format="default"/> for a discussion of this.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>One Method of Constructing a Volatile Filehandle</name>
<t>
A volatile filehandle, while opaque to the client, could contain:
</t>
<sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[
[volatile bit = 1 | server boot time | slot | generation number]
]]></sourcecode>
<ul>
<li>slot is an index in the server volatile filehandle table</li>
<li>generation number is the generation number for the table entry/slot</li>
</ul>
<t>
When the client presents a volatile filehandle, the server makes the
following checks, which assume that the check for the volatile bit has
passed. If the server boot time is less than the current server boot
time, return NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED. If slot is out of range, return
NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE. If the generation number does not match, return
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED.
</t>
<t>
When the server restarts, the table is gone (it is volatile).
</t>
<t>
If the volatile bit is 0, then it is a persistent filehandle with a
different structure following it.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Recovery from Filehandle Expiration</name>
<t>
If possible, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> recover from the receipt of an
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED error. The client must take on additional
responsibility so that it may prepare itself to recover from the
expiration of a volatile filehandle. If the server returns persistent
filehandles, the client does not need these additional steps.
</t>
<t>
For volatile filehandles, most commonly the client will need to store
the component names leading up to and including the file system object
in question. With these names, the client should be able to recover
by finding a filehandle in the namespace that is still available or
by starting at the root of the server's file system namespace.
</t>
<t>
If the expired filehandle refers to an object that has been removed
from the file system, obviously the client will not be able to recover
from the expired filehandle.
</t>
<t>
It is also possible that the expired filehandle refers to a file that
has been renamed. If the file was renamed by another client, again it
is possible that the original client will not be able to recover.
However, in the case that the client itself is renaming the file and
the file is open, it is possible that the client may be able to
recover. The client can determine the new pathname based on the
processing of the rename request. The client can then regenerate the
new filehandle based on the new pathname. The client could also use
the COMPOUND procedure to construct a series of operations
like:
</t>
<sourcecode type="nfsv4compound"><![CDATA[
RENAME A B
LOOKUP B
GETFH
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Note that the COMPOUND procedure does not provide atomicity. This
example only reduces the overhead of recovering from an expired
filehandle.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="file_attributes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File Attributes</name>
<t>
To meet the requirements of extensibility and increased
interoperability with non-UNIX platforms, attributes need to be handled
in a flexible manner. The NFSv3 fattr3 structure contains a
fixed list of attributes that not all clients and servers are able to
support or care about. The fattr3 structure cannot be extended as
new needs arise and it provides no way to indicate non-support. With
the NFSv4.1 protocol, the client is able to query what attributes
the server supports and construct requests with only those supported
attributes (or a subset thereof).
</t>
<t>
To this end, attributes are divided into three groups: <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>,
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, and named. Both <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> and <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes are
supported in the NFSv4.1 protocol by a specific and well-defined
encoding and are identified by number. They are requested by setting
a bit in the bit vector sent in the GETATTR request; the server
response includes a bit vector to list what attributes were returned
in the response. New <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> or <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes may be added
to the NFSv4 protocol as part of a new minor version
by publishing a
Standards Track RFC that allocates a new attribute number value and
defines the encoding for the attribute. See
<xref target="minor_versioning" format="default"/> for further
discussion.
</t>
<t>
Named attributes are accessed by the new OPENATTR operation, which
accesses a hidden directory of attributes associated with a file
system object. OPENATTR takes a filehandle for the object and returns
the filehandle for the attribute hierarchy. The filehandle for the
named attributes is a directory object accessible by LOOKUP or READDIR
and contains files whose names represent the named attributes and
whose data bytes are the value of the attribute. For example:
</t>
<table align="center" anchor="table3">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left"/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">LOOKUP</td>
<td align="left">"foo"</td>
<td align="left">; look up file</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GETATTR</td>
<td align="left">attrbits</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">OPENATTR</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">; access foo's named attributes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LOOKUP</td>
<td align="left">"x11icon"</td>
<td align="left">; look up specific attribute</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">READ</td>
<td align="left">0,4096</td>
<td align="left">; read stream of bytes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
Named attributes are intended for data needed by applications rather
than by an NFS client implementation. NFS implementors are strongly
encouraged to define their new attributes as <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes by
bringing them to the IETF Standards Track process.
</t>
<t>
The set of attributes that are classified as <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> is
deliberately small since servers need to do whatever it takes to support
them. A server should support as many of the <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes
as possible but, by their definition, the server is not required to
support all of them. Attributes are deemed <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> if the data is
both needed by a large number of clients and is not otherwise
reasonably computable by the client when support is not provided on
the server.
</t>
<t>
Note that the hidden directory returned by OPENATTR is a convenience
for protocol processing. The client should not make any assumptions
about the server's implementation of named attributes and whether
or not the underlying file system at the server has a named
attribute directory. Therefore, operations such as SETATTR and
GETATTR on the named attribute directory are undefined.
</t>
<section anchor="mandatory_attributes_intro" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name><bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> Attributes</name>
<t>
These <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be supported by every NFSv4.1 client and server in
order to ensure a minimum level of interoperability. The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
store and return these attributes, and the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be able to
function with an attribute set limited to these attributes. With just
the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attributes some client functionality may be impaired or
limited in some ways. A client may ask for any of these attributes to
be returned by setting a bit in the GETATTR request, and the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return their value.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="recommended_attributes_intro" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name><bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> Attributes</name>
<t>
These attributes are understood well enough to warrant support in the
NFSv4.1 protocol. However, they may not be supported on all
clients and servers. A client may ask for any of these attributes to
be returned by setting a bit in the GETATTR request but must handle
the case where the server does not return them. A client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> ask for
the set of attributes the server supports and <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> request
attributes the server does not support. A server should be tolerant
of requests for unsupported attributes and simply not return them
rather than considering the request an error. It is expected that
servers will support all attributes they comfortably can and only fail
to support attributes that are difficult to support in their
operating environments. A server should provide attributes whenever
they don't have to "tell lies" to the client. For example, a file
modification time should be either an accurate time or should not be
supported by the server. At times this will be difficult for
clients, but a client is better positioned to decide whether and how to
fabricate or construct an attribute or whether to do without the
attribute.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="named_attributes_intro" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Named Attributes</name>
<t>
These attributes are not supported by direct encoding in the NFSv4
protocol but are accessed by string names rather than
numbers and correspond to an uninterpreted stream of bytes that are
stored with the file system object. The namespace for these
attributes may be accessed by using the OPENATTR operation. The
OPENATTR operation returns a filehandle for a virtual "named attribute
directory", and further perusal and modification of the namespace may
be done using operations that work on more typical directories. In
particular, READDIR may be used to get a list of such named attributes,
and LOOKUP and OPEN may select a particular attribute. Creation of
a new named attribute may be the result of an OPEN specifying file
creation.
</t>
<t>
Once an OPEN is done, named attributes may be examined and changed
by normal READ and WRITE operations using the filehandles and stateids
returned by OPEN.
</t>
<t>
Named attributes and the named attribute directory may have
their own (non-named) attributes. Each of these objects <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have all
of the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attributes and may have additional <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>
attributes. However, the set of attributes for named attributes
and the named attribute directory need not be, and
typically will not be, as large as that for other objects in that
file system.
</t>
<t>
Named attributes and the named attribute directory might be the
target of delegations (in the case of the named attribute directory,
these will be directory delegations). However, since granting of
delegations is at the server's discretion, a server
need not support delegations on named attributes or the named
attribute directory.
</t>
<t>
It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that servers support arbitrary named attributes. A
client should not depend on the ability to store any named attributes
in the server's file system. If a server does support named
attributes, a client that is also able to handle them should be able
to copy a file's data and metadata with complete transparency from
one location to another; this would imply that names allowed for
regular directory entries are valid for named attribute names as well.
</t>
<t>
In NFSv4.1, the structure of named attribute directories is
restricted in a number of ways, in order to prevent the development
of non-interoperable implementations in which some servers support
a fully general hierarchical directory structure for named attributes
while others support a limited but adequate structure for named attributes.
In such an environment, clients or applications might come to
depend on non-portable extensions. The restrictions are:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
CREATE is not allowed in a named attribute directory. Thus, such
objects as symbolic links and special files are not allowed to
be named attributes. Further, directories may not be created
in a named attribute directory, so no hierarchical structure of
named attributes for a single object is allowed.
</li>
<li>
If OPENATTR is done on a named attribute directory or on
a named attribute, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE.
</li>
<li>
Doing a RENAME of a named attribute to a different named
attribute directory or to an ordinary (i.e., non-named-attribute)
directory is not allowed.
</li>
<li>
Creating hard links between named attribute directories or
between named attribute directories and ordinary directories
is not allowed.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Names of attributes will not be controlled by this document or other
IETF Standards Track documents. See
<xref target="namedattributesiana" format="default"/>
for further discussion.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Classification of Attributes</name>
<t>
Each of the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> and <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes can be classified in
one of three categories: per server (i.e., the value of the attribute will
be the same for all file objects that share the same
server owner; see <xref target="Server_Owners" format="default"/> for a definition of server
owner), per file system (i.e., the value of the attribute will
be the same for some or all file objects that share the
same <xref target="attrdef_fsid" format="default">fsid attribute</xref> and
server owner), or per file system
object. Note that it is possible that some per file system attributes
may vary within the file system, depending on the value of
the <xref target="attrdef_homogeneous" format="default">"homogeneous"</xref>
attribute. Note that the attributes time_access_set and
time_modify_set are not listed in this section because they are
write-only attributes corresponding to time_access and time_modify,
and are used in a special instance of SETATTR.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
The per-server attribute is:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
lease_time
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<t>
The per-file system attributes are:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
supported_attrs, suppattr_exclcreat, fh_expire_type, link_support,
symlink_support, unique_handles, aclsupport,
cansettime, case_insensitive, case_preserving,
chown_restricted, files_avail, files_free,
files_total, fs_locations, homogeneous, maxfilesize,
maxname, maxread, maxwrite, no_trunc, space_avail,
space_free, space_total, time_delta,
change_policy, fs_status,
fs_layout_type, fs_locations_info, fs_charset_cap
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<t>
The per-file system object attributes are:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
type, change, size, named_attr, fsid, rdattr_error,
filehandle, acl, archive, fileid, hidden, maxlink,
mimetype, mode, numlinks, owner, owner_group, rawdev,
space_used, system, time_access, time_backup,
time_create, time_metadata, time_modify,
mounted_on_fileid, dir_notif_delay, dirent_notif_delay,
dacl, sacl,
layout_type, layout_hint, layout_blksize, layout_alignment,
mdsthreshold, retention_get, retention_set, retentevt_get,
retentevt_set, retention_hold, mode_set_masked
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
For quota_avail_hard, quota_avail_soft, and quota_used, see their
definitions below for the appropriate classification.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="rw_attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Set-Only and Get-Only Attributes</name>
<t>
Some <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> and <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes are set-only; i.e., they
can be set via SETATTR but not retrieved via GETATTR. Similarly, some
<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> and <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes are get-only; i.e., they
can be retrieved via GETATTR but not set via SETATTR. If a client attempts
to set a get-only attribute or get a set-only attributes, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="mandatory_attributes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name><bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> Attributes - List and Definition References</name>
<t>
The list of <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attributes appears in <xref target="req_attr_table" format="default"/>.
The meaning of the columns of the table are:
</t>
<dl spacing="normal">
<dt>Name:</dt><dd>The name of the attribute.</dd>
<dt>Id:</dt><dd>The number assigned to the attribute. In
the event of conflicts between the assigned number and <xref target="RFC5662" format="default"/>, the latter is
likely authoritative, but should be resolved with Errata to
this document and/or
<xref target="RFC5662" format="default"/>. See <xref target="errata" format="default"/> for the Errata process.</dd>
<dt>Data Type:</dt><dd>The XDR data type of the attribute.</dd>
<dt>Acc:</dt><dd>Access allowed to the attribute. R means
read-only (GETATTR may retrieve, SETATTR may not
set). W means write-only (SETATTR may set, GETATTR
may not retrieve). R W means read/write (GETATTR
may retrieve, SETATTR may set).</dd>
<dt>Defined in:</dt><dd>The section of this specification that describes the
attribute.</dd>
</dl>
<table anchor="req_attr_table" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Name</th>
<th align="left">Id</th>
<th align="left">Data Type</th>
<th align="left">Acc</th>
<th align="left">Defined in:</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">supported_attrs</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">bitmap4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_supp_attr" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">type</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">nfs_ftype4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_type" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">fh_expire_type</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_fh_expire_type" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">change</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_change" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">size</td>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_size" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">link_support</td>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_link_support" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">symlink_support</td>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_symlink_support" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">named_attr</td>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_named_attr" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">fsid</td>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">fsid4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_fsid" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">unique_handles</td>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_unique_handles" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">lease_time</td>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="left">nfs_lease4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_lease_time" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">rdattr_error</td>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="left">enum</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_rdattr_error" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">filehandle</td>
<td align="left">19</td>
<td align="left">nfs_fh4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_filehandle" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">suppattr_exclcreat</td>
<td align="left">75</td>
<td align="left">bitmap4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_suppattr_exclcreat" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section anchor="recommended_attributes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name><bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> Attributes - List and Definition References</name>
<t>
The <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes are defined in
<xref target="rec_attr_tbl" format="default"/>. The meanings
of the column headers are the same as
<xref target="req_attr_table" format="default"/>; see <xref target="mandatory_attributes" format="default"/> for the meanings.
</t>
<table anchor="rec_attr_tbl" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Name</th>
<th align="left">Id</th>
<th align="left">Data Type</th>
<th align="left">Acc</th>
<th align="left">Defined in:</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">acl</td>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">nfsace4&lt;&gt;</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_acl" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">aclsupport</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_aclsupport" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">archive</td>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_archive" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">cansettime</td>
<td align="left">15</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_cansettime" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">case_insensitive</td>
<td align="left">16</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_case_insensitive" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">case_preserving</td>
<td align="left">17</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_case_preserving" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">change_policy</td>
<td align="left">60</td>
<td align="left">chg_policy4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_change_policy" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">chown_restricted</td>
<td align="left">18</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_chown_restricted" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">dacl</td>
<td align="left">58</td>
<td align="left">nfsacl41</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_dacl" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">dir_notif_delay</td>
<td align="left">56</td>
<td align="left">nfstime4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_dir_notif_delay" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">dirent_notif_delay</td>
<td align="left">57</td>
<td align="left">nfstime4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_dirent_notif_delay" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">fileid</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_fileid" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">files_avail</td>
<td align="left">21</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_files_avail" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">files_free</td>
<td align="left">22</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_files_free" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">files_total</td>
<td align="left">23</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_files_total" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">fs_charset_cap</td>
<td align="left">76</td>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_fs_charset_cap" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">fs_layout_type</td>
<td align="left">62</td>
<td align="left">layouttype4&lt;&gt;</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_fs_layout_type" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">fs_locations</td>
<td align="left">24</td>
<td align="left">fs_locations</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_fs_locations" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">fs_locations_info</td>
<td align="left">67</td>
<td align="left">fs_locations_info4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_fs_locations_info" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">fs_status</td>
<td align="left">61</td>
<td align="left">fs4_status</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_fs_status" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">hidden</td>
<td align="left">25</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_hidden" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">homogeneous</td>
<td align="left">26</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_homogeneous" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">layout_alignment</td>
<td align="left">66</td>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_layout_alignment" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">layout_blksize</td>
<td align="left">65</td>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_layout_blksize" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">layout_hint</td>
<td align="left">63</td>
<td align="left">layouthint4</td>
<td align="left">  W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_layout_hint" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">layout_type</td>
<td align="left">64</td>
<td align="left">layouttype4&lt;&gt;</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_layout_type" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">maxfilesize</td>
<td align="left">27</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_maxfilesize" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">maxlink</td>
<td align="left">28</td>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_maxlink" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">maxname</td>
<td align="left">29</td>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_maxname" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">maxread</td>
<td align="left">30</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_maxread" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">maxwrite</td>
<td align="left">31</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_maxwrite" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">mdsthreshold</td>
<td align="left">68</td>
<td align="left">mdsthreshold4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_mdsthreshold" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">mimetype</td>
<td align="left">32</td>
<td align="left">utf8str_cs</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_mimetype" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">mode</td>
<td align="left">33</td>
<td align="left">mode4</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_mode" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">mode_set_masked</td>
<td align="left">74</td>
<td align="left">mode_masked4</td>
<td align="left">  W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_mode_set_masked" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">mounted_on_fileid</td>
<td align="left">55</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_mounted_on_fileid" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">no_trunc</td>
<td align="left">34</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_no_trunc" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">numlinks</td>
<td align="left">35</td>
<td align="left">uint32_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_numlinks" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">owner</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">utf8str_mixed</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_owner" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">owner_group</td>
<td align="left">37</td>
<td align="left">utf8str_mixed</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_owner_group" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">quota_avail_hard</td>
<td align="left">38</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_quota_avail_hard" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">quota_avail_soft</td>
<td align="left">39</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_quota_avail_soft" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">quota_used</td>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_quota_used" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">rawdev</td>
<td align="left">41</td>
<td align="left">specdata4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_rawdev" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">retentevt_get</td>
<td align="left">71</td>
<td align="left">retention_get4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_retentevt_get" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">retentevt_set</td>
<td align="left">72</td>
<td align="left">retention_set4</td>
<td align="left">  W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_retentevt_set" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">retention_get</td>
<td align="left">69</td>
<td align="left">retention_get4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_retention_get" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">retention_hold</td>
<td align="left">73</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_retention_hold" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">retention_set</td>
<td align="left">70</td>
<td align="left">retention_set4</td>
<td align="left">  W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_retention_set" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sacl</td>
<td align="left">59</td>
<td align="left">nfsacl41</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_sacl" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">space_avail</td>
<td align="left">42</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_space_avail" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">space_free</td>
<td align="left">43</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_space_free" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">space_total</td>
<td align="left">44</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_space_total" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">space_used</td>
<td align="left">45</td>
<td align="left">uint64_t</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_space_used" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">system</td>
<td align="left">46</td>
<td align="left">bool</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_system" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">time_access</td>
<td align="left">47</td>
<td align="left">nfstime4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_time_access" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">time_access_set</td>
<td align="left">48</td>
<td align="left">settime4</td>
<td align="left">  W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_time_access_set" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">time_backup</td>
<td align="left">49</td>
<td align="left">nfstime4</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_time_backup" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">time_create</td>
<td align="left">50</td>
<td align="left">nfstime4</td>
<td align="left">R W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_time_create" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">time_delta</td>
<td align="left">51</td>
<td align="left">nfstime4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_time_delta" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">time_metadata</td>
<td align="left">52</td>
<td align="left">nfstime4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_time_metadata" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">time_modify</td>
<td align="left">53</td>
<td align="left">nfstime4</td>
<td align="left">R</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_time_modify" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">time_modify_set</td>
<td align="left">54</td>
<td align="left">settime4</td>
<td align="left">  W</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="attrdef_time_modify_set" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section anchor="attribute_definitions" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute Definitions</name>
<section anchor="required_attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Definitions of <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> Attributes</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_supp_attr" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 0: supported_attrs</name>
<t>
The bit vector that would retrieve all <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> and
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes that are supported for this object.
The scope of this attribute applies to all objects with a
matching fsid.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_type" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 1: type</name>
<t>
Designates the type of an object in terms of one of a number
of special constants:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
NF4REG designates a regular file.
</li>
<li>
NF4DIR designates a directory.
</li>
<li>
NF4BLK designates a block device special file.
</li>
<li>
NF4CHR designates a character device special file.
</li>
<li>
NF4LNK designates a symbolic link.
</li>
<li>
NF4SOCK designates a named socket special file.
</li>
<li>
NF4FIFO designates a fifo special file.
</li>
<li>
NF4ATTRDIR designates a named attribute directory.
</li>
<li>
NF4NAMEDATTR designates a named attribute.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Within the explanatory text and operation descriptions, the
following phrases will be used with the meanings given below:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The phrase "is a directory" means that the object's
type attribute is NF4DIR or NF4ATTRDIR.
</li>
<li>
The phrase "is a special file" means that the object's type
attribute is NF4BLK, NF4CHR, NF4SOCK, or NF4FIFO.
</li>
<li>
The phrases "is an ordinary file" and
"is a regular file" mean that the object's
type attribute is NF4REG or NF4NAMEDATTR.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_fh_expire_type" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 2: fh_expire_type</name>
<t>
Server uses this to specify filehandle expiration behavior
to the client. See <xref target="Filehandles" format="default"/> for additional
description.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_change" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 3: change</name>
<t>
A value created by the server that the client can use to
determine if file data, directory contents, or attributes of
the object have been modified. The server may return the
object's time_metadata attribute for this attribute's value,
but only if the file system object cannot be updated more
frequently than the resolution of time_metadata.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_size" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 4: size</name>
<t>
The size of the object in bytes.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_link_support" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 5: link_support</name>
<t>
TRUE, if the object's file system supports hard links.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_symlink_support" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 6: symlink_support</name>
<t>
TRUE, if the object's file system supports symbolic links.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_named_attr" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 7: named_attr</name>
<t>
TRUE, if this object has named attributes. In other words,
object has a non-empty named attribute directory.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_fsid" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 8: fsid</name>
<t>
Unique file system identifier for the file system holding this
object. The fsid attribute has major and minor components, each of
which are of data type uint64_t.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_unique_handles" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 9: unique_handles</name>
<t>
TRUE, if two distinct filehandles are guaranteed to refer to two
different file system objects.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_lease_time" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 10: lease_time</name>
<t>
Duration of the lease at server in seconds.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_rdattr_error" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 11: rdattr_error</name>
<t>
Error returned from an attempt to retrieve attributes during a READDIR operation.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_filehandle" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 19: filehandle</name>
<t>
The filehandle of this object (primarily for READDIR requests).
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_suppattr_exclcreat" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 75: suppattr_exclcreat</name>
<t>
The bit vector that would set all <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> and
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes that are supported by the EXCLUSIVE4_1
method of file creation via the OPEN operation.
The scope of this attribute applies to all objects with a
matching fsid.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="recommended_attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Definitions of Uncategorized <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> Attributes</name>
<t>
The definitions of most of the <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes follow. Collections
that share a common category are defined in other sections.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_archive" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 14: archive</name>
<t>
TRUE, if this file has been archived since the time of last
modification (deprecated in favor of time_backup).
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_cansettime" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 15: cansettime</name>
<t>
TRUE, if the server is able to change the times for a
file system object as specified in a SETATTR operation.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_case_insensitive" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 16: case_insensitive</name>
<t>
TRUE, if file name comparisons on this file system are case
insensitive.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_case_preserving" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 17: case_preserving</name>
<t>
TRUE, if file name case on this file system is preserved.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_change_policy" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 60: change_policy</name>
<t>
A value created by the server that the client can use to
determine if some server policy related to the current
file system has been subject to change. If the value
remains the same, then the client can be sure that the
values of the attributes related to fs location
and the fss_type field of the fs_status attribute have
not changed. On the other hand, a change in this value does
necessarily imply a change in policy. It is up to the client
to interrogate the server to determine if some policy relevant to
it has changed. See <xref target="chg_policy4" format="default"/> for
details.
</t>
<t>
This attribute <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> change when the value returned by
the fs_locations or fs_locations_info attribute changes, when
a file system goes from read-only to writable or vice versa,
or when the allowable set of security flavors for the file system
or any part thereof is changed.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_chown_restricted" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 18: chown_restricted</name>
<t>
If TRUE, the server will reject any request to change either
the owner or the group associated with a file if the caller
is not a privileged user (for example, "root" in UNIX
operating environments or, in Windows 2000, the "Take
Ownership" privilege).
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_fileid" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 20: fileid</name>
<t>
A number uniquely identifying the file within the file system.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_files_avail" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 21: files_avail</name>
<t>
File slots available to this user on the file system
containing this object -- this should be the smallest
relevant limit.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_files_free" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 22: files_free</name>
<t>
Free file slots on the file system containing this object --
this should be the smallest relevant limit.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_files_total" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 23: files_total</name>
<t>
Total file slots on the file system containing this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_fs_charset_cap" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 76: fs_charset_cap</name>
<t>
Character set capabilities for this file system. See
<xref target="utf8_caps" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_fs_locations" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 24: fs_locations</name>
<t>
Locations where this file system may be found. If the server
returns NFS4ERR_MOVED as an error, this attribute <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
supported.
See <xref target="fs_locations" format="default"/> for more details.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_fs_locations_info" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 67: fs_locations_info</name>
<t>
Full function file system location.
See <xref target="SEC11-fsli-info" format="default"/> for more details.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_fs_status" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 61: fs_status</name>
<t>
Generic file system type information.
See <xref target="fs_status" format="default"/> for more details.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_hidden" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 25: hidden</name>
<t>
TRUE, if the file is considered hidden with respect to
the Windows API.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_homogeneous" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 26: homogeneous</name>
<t>
TRUE, if this object's file system is homogeneous; i.e., all
objects in the file system (all objects on the server with the
same fsid) have common values for all per-file-system attributes.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_maxfilesize" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 27: maxfilesize</name>
<t>
Maximum supported file size for the file system of this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_maxlink" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 28: maxlink</name>
<t>
Maximum number of links for this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_maxname" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 29: maxname</name>
<t>
Maximum file name size supported for this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_maxread" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 30: maxread</name>
<t>
Maximum amount of data the READ operation will return for this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_maxwrite" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 31: maxwrite</name>
<t>
Maximum amount of data the WRITE operation will accept for this object.
This
attribute <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be supported if the file is writable. Lack
of this attribute can lead to the client either wasting
bandwidth or not receiving the best performance.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_mimetype" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 32: mimetype</name>
<t>
MIME body type/subtype of this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_mounted_on_fileid" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 55: mounted_on_fileid</name>
<t>
Like fileid, but if the target filehandle is the root of a
file system, this attribute represents the fileid of the
underlying directory.
</t>
<t>
UNIX-based operating environments connect a file system into
the namespace by connecting (mounting) the file system onto
the existing file object (the mount point, usually a
directory) of an existing file system. When the mount point's
parent directory is read via an API like readdir(), the return
results are directory entries, each with a component name and
a fileid. The fileid of the mount point's directory entry will
be different from the fileid that the stat() system call
returns. The stat() system call is returning the fileid of the
root of the mounted file system, whereas readdir() is
returning the fileid that stat() would have returned before any
file systems were mounted on the mount point.
</t>
<t>
Unlike NFSv3, NFSv4.1 allows a client's LOOKUP
request to cross other file systems. The client detects the
file system crossing whenever the filehandle argument of
LOOKUP has an fsid attribute different from that of the
filehandle returned by LOOKUP. A UNIX-based client will
consider this a "mount point crossing". UNIX has a legacy
scheme for allowing a process to determine its current working
directory. This relies on readdir() of a mount point's parent
and stat() of the mount point returning fileids as previously
described. The mounted_on_fileid attribute corresponds to the
fileid that readdir() would have returned as described
previously.
</t>
<t>
While the NFSv4.1 client could simply fabricate a fileid
corresponding to what mounted_on_fileid provides (and if the
server does not support mounted_on_fileid, the client has no
choice), there is a risk that the client will generate a
fileid that conflicts with one that is already assigned to
another object in the file system. Instead, if the server can
provide the mounted_on_fileid, the potential for client
operational problems in this area is eliminated.
</t>
<t>
If the server detects that there is no mounted point at the
target file object, then the value for mounted_on_fileid that
it returns is the same as that of the fileid attribute.
</t>
<t>
The mounted_on_fileid attribute is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, so the server
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> provide it if possible, and for a UNIX-based server,
this is straightforward. Usually, mounted_on_fileid will be
requested during a READDIR operation, in which case it is
trivial (at least for UNIX-based servers) to return
mounted_on_fileid since it is equal to the fileid of a
directory entry returned by readdir(). If mounted_on_fileid
is requested in a GETATTR operation, the server should obey an
invariant that has it returning a value that is equal to the
file object's entry in the object's parent directory,
i.e., what readdir() would have returned. Some operating
environments allow a series of two or more file systems to be
mounted onto a single mount point. In this case, for the
server to obey the aforementioned invariant, it will need to
find the base mount point, and not the intermediate mount
points.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_no_trunc" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 34: no_trunc</name>
<t>
If this attribute is TRUE, then if the client uses a file
name longer than name_max, an error will be
returned instead of the name being truncated.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_numlinks" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 35: numlinks</name>
<t>
Number of hard links to this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_owner" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 36: owner</name>
<t>
The string name of the owner of this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_owner_group" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 37: owner_group</name>
<t>
The string name of the group ownership of this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_quota_avail_hard" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 38: quota_avail_hard</name>
<t anchor="quota_avail_hard">
The value in bytes that represents the amount of additional
disk space beyond the current allocation that can be allocated
to this file or directory before further allocations will be
refused. It is understood that this space may be consumed by
allocations to other files or directories.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_quota_avail_soft" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 39: quota_avail_soft</name>
<t anchor="quota_avail_soft">
The value in bytes that represents the amount of additional
disk space that can be allocated to this file or directory
before the user may reasonably be warned. It is understood
that this space may be consumed by allocations to other files
or directories though there is a rule as to which other files
or directories.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_quota_used" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 40: quota_used</name>
<t anchor="quota_used">
The value in bytes that represents the amount of disk
space used by this file or directory and possibly a
number of other similar files or directories, where the
set of "similar" meets at least the criterion that
allocating space to any file or directory in the set
will reduce the "quota_avail_hard" of every other file
or directory in the set.
</t>
<t>
Note that there may be a number of distinct but
overlapping sets of files or directories for which a
quota_used value is maintained, e.g., "all files with a
given owner", "all files with a given group owner", etc.
The server is at liberty to choose any of those sets when
providing the content of the quota_used attribute, but
should do so in a repeatable way. The rule may be
configured per file system or may be "choose the set with
the smallest quota".
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_rawdev" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 41: rawdev</name>
<t>
Raw device number of file of type NF4BLK or NF4CHR. The device
number is split into major and minor numbers.
If the file's type attribute is not NF4BLK or NF4CHR,
the value returned <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be considered useful.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_space_avail" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 42: space_avail</name>
<t>
Disk space in bytes available to this user on the file system
containing this object -- this should be the smallest
relevant limit.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_space_free" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 43: space_free</name>
<t>
Free disk space in bytes on the file system containing this
object -- this should be the smallest relevant limit.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_space_total" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 44: space_total</name>
<t>
Total disk space in bytes on the file system containing this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_space_used" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 45: space_used</name>
<t>
Number of file system bytes allocated to this object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_system" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 46: system</name>
<t>
This attribute is TRUE if this file is a "system" file with
respect to the Windows operating environment.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_time_access" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 47: time_access</name>
<t>
The time_access attribute represents the time of last access to
the object by a READ operation sent to the server. The notion
of what is an "access" depends on the server's operating environment
and/or the server's file system semantics. For example, for
servers obeying Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) semantics, time_access would be updated only
by the READ and READDIR operations and not any of the operations
that modify the content of the object <xref target="read_atime" format="default"/>,
<xref target="readdir_atime" format="default"/>, <xref target="write_atime" format="default"/>. Of
course, setting the corresponding time_access_set attribute is
another way to modify the time_access attribute.
</t>
<t>
Whenever the file object resides on a writable file system,
the server should make its best efforts to record time_access into
stable storage. However, to mitigate the performance effects
of doing so, and most especially whenever the server is
satisfying the read of the object's content from its cache,
the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> cache access time updates and lazily write them
to stable storage. It is also acceptable to give
administrators of the server the option to disable time_access
updates.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_time_access_set" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 48: time_access_set</name>
<t>
Sets the time of last access to the object. SETATTR use only.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_time_backup" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 49: time_backup</name>
<t>
The time of last backup of the object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_time_create" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 50: time_create</name>
<t>
The time of creation of the object. This attribute does not
have any relation to the traditional UNIX file attribute
"ctime" or "change time".
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_time_delta" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 51: time_delta</name>
<t>
Smallest useful server time granularity.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_time_metadata" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 52: time_metadata</name>
<t>
The time of last metadata modification of the object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_time_modify" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 53: time_modify</name>
<t>
The time of last modification to the object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_time_modify_set" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 54: time_modify_set</name>
<t>
Sets the time of last modification to the object. SETATTR use only.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="owner_owner_group" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Interpreting owner and owner_group</name>
<t>
The <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes "owner" and "owner_group" (and also
users and groups within the "acl" attribute) are represented in
terms of a UTF-8 string. To avoid a representation that is tied
to a particular underlying implementation at the client or
server, the use of the UTF-8 string has been chosen. Note that
Section <xref target="RFC2624" sectionFormat="bare" section="6.1"/>
of RFC 2624 <xref target="RFC2624" format="default"/> provides
additional rationale. It is expected that the client and server
will have their own local representation of owner and
owner_group that is used for local storage or presentation to
the end user. Therefore, it is expected that when these
attributes are transferred between the client and server,
the local representation is translated to a syntax of the form
"user@dns_domain". This will allow for a client and server that
do not use the same local representation the ability to
translate to a common syntax that can be interpreted by both.
</t>
<t>
Similarly, security principals may be represented in different
ways by different security mechanisms. Servers normally
translate these representations into a common format,
generally that used by local storage, to serve as a means of
identifying the users corresponding to these security
principals. When these local identifiers are translated to
the form of the owner attribute, associated with files created
by such principals, they identify, in a common format, the
users associated with each corresponding set of security
principals.
</t>
<t>
The translation used to interpret owner and group strings is
not specified as part of the protocol. This allows various
solutions to be employed. For example, a local translation
table may be consulted that maps a numeric identifier to the
user@dns_domain syntax. A name service may also be used to
accomplish the translation. A server may provide a more
general service, not limited by any particular translation
(which would only translate a limited set of possible strings)
by storing the owner and owner_group attributes in local
storage without any translation or it may augment a
translation method by storing the entire string for attributes
for which no translation is available while using the local
representation for those cases in which a translation is
available.
</t>
<t>
Servers that do not provide support for all possible values of
the owner and owner_group attributes <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return an error
(NFS4ERR_BADOWNER) when a string is presented that has no
translation, as the value to be set for a SETATTR of the
owner, owner_group, or acl attributes. When a server does
accept an owner or owner_group value as valid on a SETATTR
(and similarly for the owner and group strings in an acl), it
is promising to return that same string when a corresponding
GETATTR is done. Configuration changes (including
changes from the mapping of the string to the local representation)
and ill-constructed
name translations (those that contain aliasing) may make that
promise impossible to honor. Servers should make appropriate
efforts to avoid a situation in which these attributes have
their values changed when no real change to ownership has
occurred.
</t>
<t>
The "dns_domain" portion of the owner string is meant to be a
DNS domain name, for example, user@example.org. Servers should
accept as valid a set of users for at least one domain. A
server may treat other domains as having no valid
translations. A more general service is provided when a
server is capable of accepting users for multiple domains, or
for all domains, subject to security constraints.
</t>
<t>
In the case where there is no translation available to the
client or server, the attribute value will be constructed
without the "@". Therefore, the absence of the @ from the
owner or owner_group attribute signifies that no translation
was available at the sender and that the receiver of the
attribute should not use that string as a basis for
translation into its own internal format. Even though the
attribute value cannot be translated, it may still be useful.
In the case of a client, the attribute string may be used for
local display of ownership.
</t>
<t>
To provide a greater degree of compatibility with NFSv3,
which identified users and groups by 32-bit unsigned user
identifiers and group identifiers, owner and group strings that
consist of decimal numeric values with no leading zeros can be
given a special interpretation by clients and servers that
choose to provide such support. The receiver may treat such a
user or group string as representing the same user as would be
represented by an NFSv3 uid or gid having the corresponding
numeric value. A server is not obligated to accept such a
string, but may return an NFS4ERR_BADOWNER instead. To avoid
this mechanism being used to subvert user and group translation,
so that a client might pass all of the owners and groups in
numeric form, a server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return an NFS4ERR_BADOWNER error
when there is a valid translation for the user or owner
designated in this way. In that case, the client must use the
appropriate name@domain string and not the special form for compatibility.
</t>
<t>
The owner string "nobody" may be used to designate an
anonymous user, which will be associated with a file created
by a security principal that cannot be mapped through normal
means to the owner attribute. Users and implementations
of NFSv4.1 <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> use "nobody" to designate a real user whose access is not anonymous.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="character_case_attributes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Character Case Attributes</name>
<t>
With respect to the case_insensitive and case_preserving
attributes, each UCS-4 character (which UTF-8 encodes) can be
mapped according to Appendix
<xref target="RFC3454" sectionFormat="bare" section="B.2"/>
of RFC 3454 <xref target="RFC3454" format="default"/>.
For general character handling and internationalization issues,
see <xref target="internationalization" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="dir_not_attrs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Directory Notification Attributes</name>
<t>
As described in <xref target="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION" format="default"/>, the
client can request a minimum delay for notifications of changes
to attributes, but the server is free to ignore what the client
requests. The client can determine in advance what notification
delays the server will accept by sending a GETATTR operation for either or
both of two directory notification attributes. When the client
calls the GET_DIR_DELEGATION operation and asks for attribute
change notifications, it should request notification delays that
are no less than the values in the server-provided attributes.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_dir_notif_delay" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 56: dir_notif_delay</name>
<t>
The dir_notif_delay attribute is the minimum number of seconds
the server will delay before notifying the client of a change
to the directory's attributes.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_dirent_notif_delay" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 57: dirent_notif_delay</name>
<t>
The dirent_notif_delay attribute is the minimum number of seconds
the server will delay before notifying the client of a change
to a file object that has an entry in the directory.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="pnfs_attr_full" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>pNFS Attribute Definitions</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_fs_layout_type" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 62: fs_layout_type</name>
<t>
The fs_layout_type attribute (see
<xref target="layouttype4" format="default"/>) applies to a
file system and indicates what layout types are supported by
the file system. When the client encounters a new fsid, the
client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> obtain the value for the fs_layout_type
attribute associated with the new file system. This attribute
is used by the client to determine if the layout types
supported by the server match any of the client's supported
layout types.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_layout_alignment" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 66: layout_alignment</name>
<t>
When a client holds layouts on files of a file system, the
layout_alignment attribute indicates the preferred alignment
for I/O to files on that file system. Where possible, the
client should send READ and WRITE operations with offsets
that are whole multiples of the layout_alignment attribute.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_layout_blksize" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 65: layout_blksize</name>
<t>
When a client holds layouts on files of a file system, the
layout_blksize attribute indicates the preferred block size
for I/O to files on that file system. Where possible, the
client should send READ operations with a count argument that
is a whole multiple of layout_blksize, and WRITE operations
with a data argument of size that is a whole multiple of
layout_blksize.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_layout_hint" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 63: layout_hint</name>
<t>
The layout_hint attribute (see
<xref target="layouthint4" format="default"/>) may be set on
newly created files to influence the metadata server's choice
for the file's layout. If possible, this attribute is one of
those set in the initial attributes within the OPEN operation.
The metadata server may choose to ignore this attribute. The
layout_hint attribute is a subset of the layout structure
returned by LAYOUTGET. For example, instead of specifying
particular devices, this would be used to suggest the stripe
width of a file. The server implementation determines which
fields within the layout will be used.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_layout_type" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 64: layout_type</name>
<t>
This attribute lists the layout type(s) available for a file.
The value returned by the server is for informational purposes
only. The client will use the LAYOUTGET operation to obtain
the information needed in order to perform I/O, for example,
the specific device information for the file and its layout.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_mdsthreshold" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 68: mdsthreshold</name>
<t>
This attribute is a server-provided hint used to communicate
to the client when it is more efficient to send READ and
WRITE operations to the metadata server or the data server.
The two types of thresholds described are file size thresholds
and I/O size thresholds. If a file's size is smaller than the
file size threshold, data accesses <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be sent to the
metadata server. If an I/O request has a length
that is below the I/O size threshold,
the I/O <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be sent to the metadata server.
Each threshold type is specified separately for read and
write.
</t>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> provide both types of thresholds for a file.
If both file size and I/O size are provided, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
reach or exceed both thresholds before sending its read or write
requests to the data server. Alternatively, if only one of
the specified thresholds is reached or exceeded, the I/O requests are
sent to the metadata server.
</t>
<t>
For each threshold type, a value of zero indicates no READ or WRITE
should be sent to the metadata server, while a value of all ones
indicates that all READs or WRITEs should be sent to the metadata
server.
</t>
<t>
The attribute is available on a per-filehandle basis. If the
current filehandle refers to a non-pNFS file or directory, the
metadata server should return an attribute that is
representative of the filehandle's file system. It is suggested
that this attribute is queried as part of the OPEN operation.
Due to dynamic system changes, the client should not assume that
the attribute will remain constant for any specific time period;
thus, it should be periodically refreshed.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "PNFS Attributes" -->
<section anchor="retention" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Retention Attributes</name>
<t>
Retention is a concept whereby a file object can be placed in an
immutable, undeletable, unrenamable state for a fixed or
infinite duration of time. Once in this "retained" state, the
file cannot be moved out of the state until the duration of
retention has been reached.
</t>
<t>
When retention is enabled, retention <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> extend to the data of
the file, and the name of file. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> extend retention
to any other property of the file, including any subset of
<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>, <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, and named attributes, with the
exceptions noted in this section.
</t>
<t>
Servers <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support or not support retention on
any file object type.
</t>
<t>
The five retention attributes are explained in the next subsections.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_retention_get" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 69: retention_get</name>
<t>
If retention is enabled for the associated file,
this attribute's value represents the retention
begin time of the file object. This attribute's
value is only readable with the GETATTR operation
and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be modified by the SETATTR operation
(<xref target="rw_attr" format="default"/>). The value of the
attribute consists of:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const RET4_DURATION_INFINITE = 0xffffffffffffffff;
struct retention_get4 {
uint64_t rg_duration;
nfstime4 rg_begin_time<1>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The field rg_duration is the duration in seconds indicating how
long the file will be retained once retention is enabled. The
field rg_begin_time is an array of up to one absolute time
value. If the array is zero length, no beginning retention time
has been established, and retention is not enabled.
If rg_duration is equal to RET4_DURATION_INFINITE, the file, once
retention is enabled, will be retained for an infinite duration.
</t>
<t>
If (as soon as) rg_duration is zero, then rg_begin_time will be
of zero length, and again, retention is not (no longer) enabled.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_retention_set" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 70: retention_set</name>
<t>
This attribute is used to set the retention
duration and optionally enable retention for
the associated file object. This attribute is
only modifiable via the SETATTR operation and
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be retrieved by the GETATTR operation
(<xref target="rw_attr" format="default"/>).
This attribute corresponds to retention_get.
The value of the attribute consists of:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct retention_set4 {
bool rs_enable;
uint64_t rs_duration<1>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
If the client sets rs_enable to TRUE, then it is enabling
retention on the file object with the begin time of retention
starting from the server's current time and date. The
duration of the retention can also be provided if the
rs_duration array is of length one. The duration is the time in
seconds from the begin time of retention, and if set to
RET4_DURATION_INFINITE, the file is to be retained forever. If
retention is enabled, with no duration specified in either
this SETATTR or a previous SETATTR, the duration defaults to
zero seconds. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> restrict the enabling of
retention or the duration of retention on the basis of the
ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION ACL permission. The enabling of
retention <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> prevent the enabling of event-based
retention or the modification of the retention_hold
attribute.
</t>
<t>
The following rules apply to both the retention_set and
retentevt_set attributes.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
As long as retention is not enabled, the client
is permitted to decrease the duration.
</li>
<li>
The duration can always be set to an
equal or higher value, even if retention is
enabled. Note that once retention is enabled,
the actual duration (as returned by the
retention_get or retentevt_get attributes;
see <xref target="attrdef_retention_get" format="default"/>
or <xref target="attrdef_retentevt_get" format="default"/>)
is constantly counting down to zero (one unit
per second), unless the duration was set to
RET4_DURATION_INFINITE. Thus, it will not be
possible for the client to precisely extend the
duration on a file that has retention enabled.
</li>
<li>
While retention is enabled, attempts to disable
retention or decrease the retention's duration
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> fail with the error NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</li>
<li>
If the principal attempting to change
retention_set or retentevt_set does not have
ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION permissions, the attempt
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> fail with NFS4ERR_ACCESS.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_retentevt_get" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 71: retentevt_get</name>
<t>
Gets the event-based retention duration, and if enabled, the
event-based retention begin time of the file object. This
attribute is like retention_get, but refers to event-based
retention. The event that triggers event-based retention is
not defined by the NFSv4.1 specification.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_retentevt_set" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 72: retentevt_set</name>
<t>
Sets the event-based retention duration, and optionally enables
event-based retention on the file object. This attribute
corresponds to retentevt_get and is like retention_set, but
refers to event-based retention. When event-based retention
is set, the file <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be retained even if non-event-based
retention has been set, and the duration of non-event-based
retention has been reached. Conversely, when non-event-based
retention has been set, the file <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be retained even if
event-based retention has been set, and the duration of
event-based retention has been reached. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
restrict the enabling of event-based retention or the duration
of event-based retention on the basis of the
ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION ACL permission. The enabling of
event-based retention <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> prevent the enabling of
non-event-based retention or the modification of the
retention_hold attribute.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="attrdef_retention_hold" numbered="true">
<name>Attribute 73: retention_hold</name>
<t>
Gets or sets administrative retention holds, one hold per bit
position.
</t>
<t>
This attribute allows one to 64 administrative holds, one hold
per bit on the attribute. If retention_hold is not zero, then
the file <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be deleted, renamed, or modified, even if
the duration on enabled event or non-event-based retention has
been reached. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> restrict the modification of
retention_hold on the basis of the ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION_HOLD
ACL permission. The enabling of administration retention
holds does not prevent the enabling of event-based or
non-event-based retention.
</t>
<t>
If the principal attempting to change retention_hold does
not have ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION_HOLD permissions,
the attempt <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> fail with NFS4ERR_ACCESS.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="acl" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Access Control Attributes</name>
<t>
Access Control Lists (ACLs) are file attributes that specify
fine-grained access control. This section covers the
"acl", "dacl", "sacl",
"aclsupport", "mode", and
"mode_set_masked" file attributes and their
interactions. Note that file attributes may apply to any file
system object.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Goals</name>
<t>
ACLs and modes represent two well-established models for
specifying permissions. This section specifies requirements
that attempt to meet the following goals:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If a server supports the mode attribute, it should provide
reasonable semantics to clients that only set and retrieve
the mode attribute.
</li>
<li>
If a server supports ACL attributes, it should provide
reasonable semantics to clients that only set and retrieve
those attributes.
</li>
<li>
On servers that support the mode attribute, if ACL
attributes have never been set on an object, via
inheritance or explicitly, the behavior should be
traditional UNIX-like behavior.
</li>
<li>
<t>
On servers that support the mode attribute, if the ACL
attributes have been previously set on an object, either
explicitly or via inheritance:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Setting only the mode attribute should effectively
control the traditional UNIX-like permissions of read,
write, and execute on owner, owner_group, and other.
</li>
<li>
Setting only the mode attribute should provide
reasonable security. For example, setting a mode of
000 should be enough to ensure that future OPEN operations for
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ or OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE by any principal fail, regardless of a
previously existing or inherited ACL.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
NFSv4.1 may introduce different
semantics relating to the mode and ACL attributes,
but it does not render invalid any previously
existing implementations. Additionally, this
section provides clarifications based on previous
implementations and discussions around them.
</li>
<li>
On servers that support both the mode and the acl or
dacl attributes, the server must keep the two consistent
with each other. The value of the mode attribute (with
the exception of the three high-order bits described in
<xref target="attrdef_mode" format="default"/>) must be determined entirely
by the value of the ACL, so that use of the mode is
never required for anything other than setting the
three high-order bits. See <xref target="setattr" format="default"/>
for exact requirements.
</li>
<li>
When a mode attribute is set on an object, the ACL
attributes may need to be modified in order to not conflict
with the new mode. In such cases, it is desirable that the
ACL keep as much information as possible. This includes
information about inheritance, AUDIT and ALARM ACEs, and
permissions granted and denied that do not conflict with
the new mode.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File Attributes Discussion</name>
<section anchor="attrdef_acl" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute 12: acl</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 ACL attribute contains an array of Access
Control Entries (ACEs) that are associated with the file
system object. Although the client can set and
get the acl attribute, the server is responsible for using
the ACL to perform access control. The client can use the
OPEN or ACCESS operations to check access without modifying
or reading data or metadata.
</t>
<t>
The NFS ACE structure is defined as follows:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
typedef uint32_t acetype4;
typedef uint32_t aceflag4;
typedef uint32_t acemask4;
struct nfsace4 {
acetype4 type;
aceflag4 flag;
acemask4 access_mask;
utf8str_mixed who;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
To determine if a request succeeds, the server processes
each nfsace4 entry in order. Only ACEs that have a "who"
that matches the requester are considered. Each ACE is
processed until all of the bits of the requester's access
have been ALLOWED. Once a bit (see below) has been ALLOWED
by an ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE, it is no longer considered in the
processing of later ACEs. If an ACCESS_DENIED_ACE is
encountered where the requester's access still has unALLOWED
bits in common with the "access_mask" of the ACE, the
request is denied. When the ACL is fully processed, if
there are bits in the requester's mask that have not been
ALLOWED or DENIED, access is denied.
</t>
<t>
Unlike the ALLOW and DENY ACE types, the ALARM and AUDIT ACE
types do not affect a requester's access, and instead are
for triggering events as a result of a requester's access
attempt. Therefore, AUDIT and ALARM ACEs are processed only
after processing ALLOW and DENY ACEs.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 ACL model is quite rich. Some server
platforms may provide access-control functionality that goes
beyond the UNIX-style mode attribute, but that is not as
rich as the NFS ACL model. So that users can take advantage
of this more limited functionality, the server may support
the acl attributes by mapping between its ACL model and the
NFSv4.1 ACL model. Servers must ensure that the ACL
they actually store or enforce is at least as strict as the
NFSv4 ACL that was set. It is tempting to accomplish this
by rejecting any ACL that falls outside the small set that
can be represented accurately. However, such an approach
can render ACLs unusable without special client-side
knowledge of the server's mapping, which defeats the purpose
of having a common NFSv4 ACL protocol. Therefore, servers
should accept every ACL that they can without compromising
security. To help accomplish this, servers may make a
special exception, in the case of unsupported permission
bits, to the rule that bits not ALLOWED or DENIED by an ACL
must be denied. For example, a UNIX-style server might
choose to silently allow read attribute permissions even
though an ACL does not explicitly allow those permissions.
(An ACL that explicitly denies permission to read attributes
should still be rejected.)
</t>
<t>
The situation is complicated by the fact that a server may
have multiple modules that enforce ACLs. For example, the
enforcement for NFSv4.1 access may be different from,
but not weaker than, the enforcement for local access, and
both may be different from the enforcement for access
through other protocols such as SMB (Server Message Block). So it may be useful for
a server to accept an ACL even if not all of its modules are
able to support it.
</t>
<t>
The guiding principle with regard to NFSv4 access is
that the server must not accept ACLs that appear to
make access to the file more restrictive than it really is.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>ACE Type</name>
<t>
The constants used for the type field (acetype4) are as
follows:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const ACE4_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE = 0x00000000;
const ACE4_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE = 0x00000001;
const ACE4_SYSTEM_AUDIT_ACE_TYPE = 0x00000002;
const ACE4_SYSTEM_ALARM_ACE_TYPE = 0x00000003;
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Only the ALLOWED and DENIED bits may be used in the
dacl attribute, and only the AUDIT and ALARM bits may be
used in the sacl attribute. All four are permitted in the
acl attribute.
</t>
<table align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Value</th>
<th align="left">Abbreviation</th>
<th align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">ACE4_ACCESS_ALLOWED_ACE_TYPE</td>
<td align="left">ALLOW</td>
<td align="left">
Explicitly grants the access defined in acemask4 to
the file or directory.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ACE4_ACCESS_DENIED_ACE_TYPE</td>
<td align="left">DENY</td>
<td align="left">
Explicitly denies the access defined in acemask4 to
the file or directory.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ACE4_SYSTEM_AUDIT_ACE_TYPE</td>
<td align="left">AUDIT</td>
<td align="left">
Log (in a system-dependent way) any access attempt to
a file or directory that uses any of the access
methods specified in acemask4.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ACE4_SYSTEM_ALARM_ACE_TYPE</td>
<td align="left">ALARM</td>
<td align="left">
Generate an alarm (in a system-dependent way) when any
access attempt is made to a file or directory for the
access methods specified in acemask4.
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
The "Abbreviation" column denotes how the
types will be referred to throughout the rest of this
section.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="attrdef_aclsupport" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute 13: aclsupport</name>
<t>
A server need not support all of the above ACE types.
This attribute indicates which ACE types are supported for
the current file system. The bitmask constants used to
represent the above definitions within the aclsupport
attribute are as follows:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const ACL4_SUPPORT_ALLOW_ACL = 0x00000001;
const ACL4_SUPPORT_DENY_ACL = 0x00000002;
const ACL4_SUPPORT_AUDIT_ACL = 0x00000004;
const ACL4_SUPPORT_ALARM_ACL = 0x00000008;
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Servers that support either the ALLOW or DENY ACE type
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support both ALLOW and DENY ACE types.
</t>
<t>
Clients should not attempt to set an ACE unless the server
claims support for that ACE type. If the server receives a
request to set an ACE that it cannot store, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reject
the request with NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP. If the server
receives a request to set an ACE that it can store but
cannot enforce, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> reject the request with
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP.
</t>
<t>
Support for any of the ACL attributes is
optional (albeit <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>).
However, a server that supports either of the new ACL
attributes (dacl or sacl) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> allow use of the new ACL
attributes to access all of the ACE types that it
supports. In other words, if such a server supports ALLOW
or DENY ACEs, then it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the dacl attribute, and
if it supports AUDIT or ALARM ACEs, then it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support
the sacl attribute.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="acemask" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>ACE Access Mask</name>
<t>
The bitmask constants used for the access mask field
are as follows:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const ACE4_READ_DATA = 0x00000001;
const ACE4_LIST_DIRECTORY = 0x00000001;
const ACE4_WRITE_DATA = 0x00000002;
const ACE4_ADD_FILE = 0x00000002;
const ACE4_APPEND_DATA = 0x00000004;
const ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY = 0x00000004;
const ACE4_READ_NAMED_ATTRS = 0x00000008;
const ACE4_WRITE_NAMED_ATTRS = 0x00000010;
const ACE4_EXECUTE = 0x00000020;
const ACE4_DELETE_CHILD = 0x00000040;
const ACE4_READ_ATTRIBUTES = 0x00000080;
const ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES = 0x00000100;
const ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION = 0x00000200;
const ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION_HOLD = 0x00000400;
const ACE4_DELETE = 0x00010000;
const ACE4_READ_ACL = 0x00020000;
const ACE4_WRITE_ACL = 0x00040000;
const ACE4_WRITE_OWNER = 0x00080000;
const ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE = 0x00100000;
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Note that some masks have coincident values, for
example, ACE4_READ_DATA and ACE4_LIST_DIRECTORY.
The mask entries ACE4_LIST_DIRECTORY,
ACE4_ADD_FILE, and ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY are
intended to be used with directory objects,
while ACE4_READ_DATA, ACE4_WRITE_DATA, and
ACE4_APPEND_DATA are intended to be used with
non-directory objects.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Discussion of Mask Attributes</name>
<t>ACE4_READ_DATA</t>
<ul empty="true"><li> <dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>READ</t>
<t>OPEN</t></dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
Permission to read the data of the file.
</t>
<t>
Servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> allow a user the ability to read the data
of the file when only the ACE4_EXECUTE access mask bit is
allowed.
</t>
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_LIST_DIRECTORY</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd>READDIR</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to list the contents of a directory.
</dd>
</dl>
</li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_WRITE_DATA</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>WRITE</t>
<t>OPEN</t>
<t>SETATTR of size</t>
</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to modify a file's data.
</dd>
</dl>
</li></ul>
<t>ACE4_ADD_FILE</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>CREATE</t>
<t>LINK</t>
<t>OPEN</t>
<t>RENAME</t>
</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to add a new file in a directory.
The CREATE operation is affected when nfs_ftype4
is NF4LNK, NF4BLK, NF4CHR, NF4SOCK, or
NF4FIFO. (NF4DIR is not listed because it is
covered by ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY.) OPEN is
affected when used to create a regular file.
LINK and RENAME are always affected.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_APPEND_DATA</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>WRITE</t>
<t>OPEN</t>
<t>SETATTR of size</t>
</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
The ability to modify a file's data, but only
starting at EOF. This allows for the notion of
append-only files, by allowing ACE4_APPEND_DATA
and denying ACE4_WRITE_DATA to the same user or
group. If a file has an ACL such as the one
described above and a WRITE request is made for
somewhere other than EOF, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_ACCESS.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_ADD_SUBDIRECTORY</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>CREATE</t>
<t>RENAME</t></dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to create a subdirectory in a
directory. The CREATE operation is affected
when nfs_ftype4 is NF4DIR. The RENAME operation
is always affected.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_READ_NAMED_ATTRS</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>OPENATTR</t></dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to read the named attributes of a
file or to look up the named attribute
directory. OPENATTR is affected when it is not
used to create a named attribute directory.
This is when 1) createdir is TRUE, but a named
attribute directory already exists, or 2)
createdir is FALSE.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_WRITE_NAMED_ATTRS</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>OPENATTR</t>
</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to write the named attributes of a
file or to create a named attribute directory.
OPENATTR is affected when it is used to create a
named attribute directory. This is when
createdir is TRUE and no named attribute
directory exists. The ability to check whether
or not a named attribute directory exists
depends on the ability to look it up; therefore,
users also need the ACE4_READ_NAMED_ATTRS
permission in order to create a named attribute
directory.
</dd>
</dl>
</li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_EXECUTE</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>READ</t>
<t>OPEN</t>
<t>REMOVE</t>
<t>RENAME</t>
<t>LINK</t>
<t>CREATE</t>
</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
Permission to execute a file.
</t>
<t>
Servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> allow a
user the ability to read the data of the file
when only the ACE4_EXECUTE access mask bit is
allowed. This is because there is no way to
execute a file without reading the contents.
Though a server may treat ACE4_EXECUTE and
ACE4_READ_DATA bits identically when deciding to
permit a READ operation, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> still allow
the two bits to be set independently in ACLs,
and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> distinguish between them when replying
to ACCESS operations. In particular, servers
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> silently turn on one of the two bits
when the other is set, as that would make it
impossible for the client to correctly enforce
the distinction between read and execute
permissions.
</t>
<t>As an example, following a SETATTR of the following ACL:</t>
<ul empty="true">
<li>nfsuser:ACE4_EXECUTE:ALLOW</li>
</ul>
<t>
A subsequent GETATTR of ACL for that file <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return:
</t>
<ul empty="true">
<li>nfsuser:ACE4_EXECUTE:ALLOW</li>
</ul>
<t>
Rather than:
</t>
<ul empty="true">
<li>
nfsuser:ACE4_EXECUTE/ACE4_READ_DATA:ALLOW
</li></ul>
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_EXECUTE</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd>LOOKUP</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to traverse/search a directory.
</dd>
</dl>
</li></ul>
<t>ACE4_DELETE_CHILD</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>REMOVE</t>
<t>RENAME</t></dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to delete a file or directory within
a directory.
See <xref target="delete-delete_child" format="default"/>
for information on ACE4_DELETE and
ACE4_DELETE_CHILD interact.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_READ_ATTRIBUTES</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>GETATTR of file system object attributes</t>
<t>VERIFY</t>
<t>NVERIFY</t>
<t>READDIR</t></dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
The ability to read basic attributes (non-ACLs)
of a file. On a UNIX system, basic attributes
can be thought of as the stat-level attributes.
Allowing this access mask bit would mean that the
entity can execute "ls -l" and stat. If a
READDIR operation requests attributes, this mask
must be allowed for the READDIR to succeed.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>SETATTR of time_access_set, time_backup,</t>
<t>time_create, time_modify_set, mimetype, hidden, system</t></dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to change the times associated with a
file or directory to an arbitrary value. Also
permission to change the mimetype, hidden, and
system attributes. A user having
ACE4_WRITE_DATA or ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES will be
allowed to set the times associated with a file
to the current server time.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd>SETATTR of retention_set, retentevt_set.</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to modify the durations of event and
non-event-based retention. Also permission to
enable event and non-event-based retention. A
server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> behave such that setting
ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES allows
ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_WRITE_RETENTION_HOLD</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd>SETATTR of retention_hold.</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to modify the administration
retention holds. A server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> map
ACE4_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES to
ACE_WRITE_RETENTION_HOLD.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_DELETE</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd>REMOVE</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to delete the
file or directory.
See <xref target="delete-delete_child" format="default"/>
for information on ACE4_DELETE and
ACE4_DELETE_CHILD interact.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_READ_ACL</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd><t>GETATTR of acl, dacl, or sacl</t>
<t>NVERIFY</t>
<t>VERIFY</t></dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to read the ACL.
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_WRITE_ACL</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd>SETATTR of acl and mode</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>Permission to write the acl and mode attributes.</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_WRITE_OWNER</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd>SETATTR of owner and owner_group</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
Permission to write the owner and owner_group
attributes. On UNIX systems, this is the
ability to execute chown() and chgrp().
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE</t>
<ul empty="true"><li>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>Operation(s) affected:</dt>
<dd>NONE</dd>
<dt>Discussion:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
Permission to use the file object as a
synchronization primitive for interprocess
communication. This permission is not enforced
or interpreted by the NFSv4.1 server on behalf of
the client.
</t>
<t>
Typically, the ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE permission is
only meaningful on local file systems, i.e.,
file systems not accessed via NFSv4.1. The reason
that the permission bit exists is that some operating
environments, such as Windows, use ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE.
</t>
<t>
For example, if a client copies a file that has
ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE set from a local file system to
an NFSv4.1 server, and then later copies the file
from the NFSv4.1 server to a local file system,
it is likely that if ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE was set
in the original file, the client will want it
set in the second copy. The first copy will not
have the permission set unless the NFSv4.1 server
has the means to set the ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE bit. The
second copy will not have the permission set unless
the NFSv4.1 server has the means to retrieve the
ACE4_SYNCHRONIZE bit.
</t>
</dd>
</dl></li>
</ul>
<t>
Server implementations need not provide the granularity
of control that is implied by this list of masks. For
example, POSIX-based systems might not distinguish
ACE4_APPEND_DATA (the ability to append to a file) from
ACE4_WRITE_DATA (the ability to modify existing
contents); both masks would be tied to a single "write"
permission <xref target="chmod" format="default"/>. When such a server returns attributes to the
client, it would show both ACE4_APPEND_DATA and
ACE4_WRITE_DATA if and only if the write permission is
enabled.
</t>
<t>
If a server receives a SETATTR request that it cannot
accurately implement, it should err in the direction of
more restricted access, except in the previously
discussed cases of execute and read. For example,
suppose a server cannot distinguish overwriting data
from appending new data, as described in the previous
paragraph. If a client submits an ALLOW ACE where
ACE4_APPEND_DATA is set but ACE4_WRITE_DATA is not (or
vice versa), the server should either turn off
ACE4_APPEND_DATA or reject the request with
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="delete-delete_child" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>ACE4_DELETE vs. ACE4_DELETE_CHILD</name>
<t>
Two access mask bits govern the ability to delete a
directory entry: ACE4_DELETE on the object
itself (the "target") and ACE4_DELETE_CHILD on
the containing directory (the "parent").
</t>
<t>
Many systems also take the "sticky bit" (MODE4_SVTX)
on a directory to allow unlink only to a user that
owns either the target or the parent; on some
such systems the decision also depends on
whether the target is writable.
</t>
<t>
Servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> allow unlink if either ACE4_DELETE
is permitted on the target, or ACE4_DELETE_CHILD is
permitted on the parent. (Note that this is
true even if the parent or target explicitly
denies one of these permissions.)
</t>
<t>
If the ACLs in question neither explicitly ALLOW
nor DENY either of the above, and if MODE4_SVTX is
not set on the parent, then the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> allow
the removal if and only if ACE4_ADD_FILE is permitted.
In the case where MODE4_SVTX is set, the server
may also require the remover to own either the parent
or the target, or may require the target to be
writable.
</t>
<t>
This allows servers to support something close to
traditional UNIX-like semantics, with ACE4_ADD_FILE
taking the place of the write bit.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="aceflag" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>ACE flag</name>
<t>
The bitmask constants used for the flag field are as
follows:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE = 0x00000001;
const ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE = 0x00000002;
const ACE4_NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT_ACE = 0x00000004;
const ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE = 0x00000008;
const ACE4_SUCCESSFUL_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG = 0x00000010;
const ACE4_FAILED_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG = 0x00000020;
const ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP = 0x00000040;
const ACE4_INHERITED_ACE = 0x00000080;
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
A server need not support any of these flags. If the
server supports flags that are similar to, but not
exactly the same as, these flags, the implementation
may define a mapping between the protocol-defined
flags and the implementation-defined flags.
</t>
<t>
For example, suppose a client tries to set an ACE with
ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE set but not
ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE. If the server does not
support any form of ACL inheritance, the server should
reject the request with NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP. If the
server supports a single "inherit ACE" flag that
applies to both files and directories, the server may
reject the request (i.e., requiring the client to set
both the file and directory inheritance flags). The
server may also accept the request and silently turn
on the ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE flag.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Discussion of Flag Bits</name>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE</dt>
<dd>
Any non-directory file in any
sub-directory will get this ACE
inherited.
</dd>
<dt>ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE</dt>
<dd>
<t>
Can be placed on a directory and indicates
that this ACE should be added to each new
directory created.
</t>
<t>
If this flag is set in an ACE in an ACL
attribute to be set on a non-directory
file system object, the operation
attempting to set the ACL <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> fail
with NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP.
</t>
</dd>
<dt>ACE4_NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT_ACE</dt>
<dd>
Can be placed on a directory. This flag
tells the server that inheritance of this
ACE should stop at newly created child
directories.
</dd>
<dt>ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE</dt>
<dd>
<t>
Can be placed on a directory but does not
apply to the directory; ALLOW and DENY ACEs
with this bit set do not affect access to
the directory, and AUDIT and ALARM ACEs
with this bit set do not trigger log or
alarm events. Such ACEs only take effect
once they are applied (with this bit
cleared) to newly created files and
directories as specified by the
ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE and ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE
flags.
</t>
<t>
If this flag is present on an ACE, but
neither ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE nor
ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE is present, then
an operation attempting to set such an
attribute <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> fail with
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP.
</t>
</dd>
<dt>ACE4_SUCCESSFUL_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG</dt>
<dd/>
<dt>ACE4_FAILED_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG</dt>
<dd>
The ACE4_SUCCESSFUL_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG
(SUCCESS) and ACE4_FAILED_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG
(FAILED) flag bits may be set only on
ACE4_SYSTEM_AUDIT_ACE_TYPE (AUDIT) and
ACE4_SYSTEM_ALARM_ACE_TYPE (ALARM) ACE
types. If during the processing of the
file's ACL, the server encounters an AUDIT
or ALARM ACE that matches the principal
attempting the OPEN, the server notes that
fact, and the presence, if any, of the
SUCCESS and FAILED flags encountered in
the AUDIT or ALARM ACE. Once the server
completes the ACL processing, it then
notes if the operation succeeded or
failed. If the operation succeeded, and if
the SUCCESS flag was set for a matching
AUDIT or ALARM ACE, then the appropriate
AUDIT or ALARM event occurs. If the
operation failed, and if the FAILED flag
was set for the matching AUDIT or ALARM
ACE, then the appropriate AUDIT or ALARM
event occurs. Either or both of the
SUCCESS or FAILED can be set, but if
neither is set, the AUDIT or ALARM ACE is
not useful.
</dd>
<dt/>
<dd>
The previously described processing
applies to ACCESS operations even when
they return NFS4_OK. For the purposes of
AUDIT and ALARM, we consider an ACCESS
operation to be a "failure" if it fails
to return a bit that was requested and
supported.
</dd>
<dt>ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP</dt>
<dd>
Indicates that the "who" refers to a GROUP
as defined under UNIX or a GROUP ACCOUNT
as defined under Windows. Clients and
servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore the
ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP flag on ACEs with a
who value equal to one of the special
identifiers outlined in
<xref target="acewho" format="default"/>.
</dd>
<dt>ACE4_INHERITED_ACE</dt>
<dd>
Indicates that this ACE is inherited from
a parent directory. A server that supports
automatic inheritance will place
this flag on any ACEs inherited from the
parent directory when creating a new
object. Client applications will use this
to perform automatic inheritance.
Clients and servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> clear this
bit in the acl attribute; it may only
be used in the dacl and sacl attributes.
</dd>
</dl>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="acewho" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>ACE Who</name>
<t>
The "who" field of an ACE is an identifier that
specifies the principal or principals to whom the ACE
applies. It may refer to a user or a group, with the flag
bit ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP specifying which.
</t>
<t>
There are several special identifiers that need to be
understood universally, rather than in the context of a
particular DNS domain. Some of these identifiers cannot be
understood when an NFS client accesses the server, but
have meaning when a local process accesses the file. The
ability to display and modify these permissions is
permitted over NFS, even if none of the access methods on
the server understands the identifiers.
</t>
<table anchor="specialwho" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Who</th>
<th align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">OWNER</td>
<td align="left">
The owner of the file.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GROUP</td>
<td align="left">
The group associated with the file.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">EVERYONE</td>
<td align="left">
The world, including the owner and owning group.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">INTERACTIVE</td>
<td align="left">
Accessed from an interactive terminal.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NETWORK</td>
<td align="left">
Accessed via the network.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">DIALUP</td>
<td align="left">
Accessed as a dialup user to the server.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">BATCH</td>
<td align="left">
Accessed from a batch job.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ANONYMOUS</td>
<td align="left">
Accessed without any authentication.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">AUTHENTICATED</td>
<td align="left">
Any authenticated user (opposite of
ANONYMOUS).
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SERVICE</td>
<td align="left">
Access from a system service.
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
To avoid conflict, these special identifiers are
distinguished by an appended "@" and should appear in the
form "xxxx@" (with no domain name after the "@"), for
example, ANONYMOUS@.
</t>
<t>
The ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP flag <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored on
entries with these special identifiers. When encoding
entries with these special identifiers, the
ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP flag <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be set to zero.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Discussion of EVERYONE@</name>
<t>
It is important to note that "EVERYONE@" is not
equivalent to the UNIX "other" entity. This is
because, by definition, UNIX "other" does not include
the owner or owning group of a file. "EVERYONE@" means
literally everyone, including the owner or owning
group.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="attrdef_dacl" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute 58: dacl</name>
<t>
The dacl attribute is like the acl attribute,
but dacl allows
just ALLOW and DENY ACEs. The dacl
attribute supports automatic inheritance (see
<xref target="auto_inherit" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="attrdef_sacl" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute 59: sacl</name>
<t>
The sacl attribute is like the acl attribute,
but sacl allows
just AUDIT and ALARM ACEs. The sacl
attribute supports automatic inheritance (see
<xref target="auto_inherit" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="attrdef_mode" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute 33: mode</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 mode attribute is based on the UNIX mode
bits. The following bits are defined:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const MODE4_SUID = 0x800; /* set user id on execution */
const MODE4_SGID = 0x400; /* set group id on execution */
const MODE4_SVTX = 0x200; /* save text even after use */
const MODE4_RUSR = 0x100; /* read permission: owner */
const MODE4_WUSR = 0x080; /* write permission: owner */
const MODE4_XUSR = 0x040; /* execute permission: owner */
const MODE4_RGRP = 0x020; /* read permission: group */
const MODE4_WGRP = 0x010; /* write permission: group */
const MODE4_XGRP = 0x008; /* execute permission: group */
const MODE4_ROTH = 0x004; /* read permission: other */
const MODE4_WOTH = 0x002; /* write permission: other */
const MODE4_XOTH = 0x001; /* execute permission: other */
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Bits MODE4_RUSR, MODE4_WUSR, and MODE4_XUSR apply to the
principal identified in the owner attribute. Bits MODE4_RGRP,
MODE4_WGRP, and MODE4_XGRP apply to principals identified in
the owner_group attribute but who are not identified in the
owner attribute. Bits MODE4_ROTH, MODE4_WOTH, and MODE4_XOTH apply
to any principal that does not match that in the owner
attribute and does not have a group matching that of the
owner_group attribute.
</t>
<t>
Bits within a mode other than those specified above
are not defined by this protocol. A server
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return bits other than those defined above in a
GETATTR or READDIR operation, and it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL
if bits other than those defined above are set in a SETATTR,
CREATE, OPEN, VERIFY, or NVERIFY operation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="attrdef_mode_set_masked" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute 74: mode_set_masked</name>
<t>
The mode_set_masked attribute is a write-only attribute
that allows individual bits in the mode attribute to be
set or reset, without changing others. It allows, for
example, the bits MODE4_SUID, MODE4_SGID, and MODE4_SVTX
to be modified while leaving unmodified any of the
nine low-order mode bits devoted to permissions.
</t>
<t>
In such instances that the nine low-order bits are left
unmodified, then neither the acl nor the dacl attribute
should be automatically modified as discussed in
<xref target="setattr" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
The mode_set_masked attribute consists of two words,
each in the form of a mode4. The first consists of the
value to be applied to the current mode value and the
second is a mask. Only bits set to one in the mask word
are changed (set or reset) in the file's mode. All
other bits in the mode remain unchanged. Bits in the
first word that correspond to bits that are zero in
the mask are ignored, except that undefined bits are
checked for validity and can result in NFS4ERR_INVAL as
described below.
</t>
<t>
The mode_set_masked attribute is only valid in a SETATTR
operation. If it is used in a CREATE or OPEN operation, the
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
<t>
Bits not defined as valid in the mode attribute are not
valid in either word of the mode_set_masked attribute.
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL
if any such bits are set to one in a SETATTR.
If the mode and
mode_set_masked attributes are both specified in the
same SETATTR, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> also return NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Common Methods</name>
<t>
The requirements in this section will be referred to in future
sections, especially <xref target="aclreqs" format="default"/>.
</t>
<section anchor="useacl" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Interpreting an ACL</name>
<section anchor="serverinterp" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Considerations</name>
<t>
The server uses the algorithm described in
<xref target="attrdef_acl" format="default"/> to determine whether an ACL
allows access to an object. However, the ACL might not be
the sole determiner of access. For example:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
In the case of a file system exported as read-only,
the server may deny write access even though
an object's ACL grants it.
</li>
<li>
Server implementations <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> grant ACE4_WRITE_ACL
and ACE4_READ_ACL permissions to prevent
a situation from arising in which there is no valid
way to ever modify the ACL.
</li>
<li>
All servers will allow a user the ability to read
the data of the file when only the execute
permission is granted (i.e., if the ACL denies the
user the ACE4_READ_DATA access and allows the user
ACE4_EXECUTE, the server will allow the user to
read the data of the file).
</li>
<li>
Many servers have the notion of owner-override in
which the owner of the object is allowed to
override accesses that are denied by the ACL.
This may be helpful, for example, to allow users
continued access to open files on which the
permissions have changed.
</li>
<li>
Many servers have the notion of a
"superuser" that has privileges beyond
an ordinary user. The superuser may be able
to read or write data or metadata in ways that would
not be permitted by the ACL.
</li>
<li>
A retention attribute might also block access otherwise
allowed by ACLs (see <xref target="retention" format="default"/>).
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="clientinterp" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Considerations</name>
<t>
Clients <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> do their own access checks based on
their interpretation of the ACL, but rather use the OPEN and
ACCESS operations to do access checks. This allows the
client to act on the results of having the server
determine whether or not access should be granted based on
its interpretation of the ACL.
</t>
<t>
Clients must be aware of situations in which an object's
ACL will define a certain access even though the server
will not enforce it. In general, but especially in these
situations, the client needs to do its part in the
enforcement of access as defined by the ACL. To do this,
the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> send the appropriate ACCESS operation
prior to servicing the request of the user or application
in order to determine whether the user or application
should be granted the access requested. For examples in
which the ACL may define accesses that the server doesn't
enforce, see <xref target="serverinterp" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="computemode" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Computing a Mode Attribute from an ACL</name>
<t>
The following method can be used to calculate the MODE4_R*,
MODE4_W*, and MODE4_X* bits of a mode attribute, based upon
an ACL.
</t>
<t>
First, for each of the special identifiers OWNER@, GROUP@, and
EVERYONE@, evaluate the ACL in order, considering only ALLOW
and DENY ACEs for the identifier EVERYONE@ and for the
identifier under consideration. The result of the evaluation
will be an NFSv4 ACL mask showing exactly which bits are
permitted to that identifier.
</t>
<t>
Then translate the calculated mask for OWNER@, GROUP@, and
EVERYONE@ into mode bits for, respectively, the user, group,
and other, as follows:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Set the read bit (MODE4_RUSR, MODE4_RGRP, or
MODE4_ROTH) if and only if ACE4_READ_DATA is set in
the corresponding mask.
</li>
<li>
Set the write bit (MODE4_WUSR, MODE4_WGRP, or
MODE4_WOTH) if and only if ACE4_WRITE_DATA and
ACE4_APPEND_DATA are both set in the corresponding
mask.
</li>
<li>
Set the execute bit (MODE4_XUSR, MODE4_XGRP, or
MODE4_XOTH), if and only if ACE4_EXECUTE is set in the
corresponding mask.
</li>
</ol>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Discussion</name>
<t>
Some server implementations also add bits permitted to
named users and groups to the group bits (MODE4_RGRP,
MODE4_WGRP, and MODE4_XGRP).
</t>
<t>
Implementations are discouraged from doing this, because
it has been found to cause confusion for users who see
members of a file's group denied access that the mode
bits appear to allow. (The presence of DENY ACEs may also
lead to such behavior, but DENY ACEs are expected to be
more rarely used.)
</t>
<t>
The same user confusion seen when fetching the mode also
results if setting the mode does not effectively control
permissions for the owner, group, and other users; this
motivates some of the requirements that follow.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="aclreqs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Requirements</name>
<t>
The server that supports both mode and ACL must take care to
synchronize the MODE4_*USR, MODE4_*GRP, and MODE4_*OTH bits with
the ACEs that have respective who fields of "OWNER@", "GROUP@",
and "EVERYONE@". This way, the client can see if semantically equivalent
access permissions exist whether the client asks for the owner,
owner_group, and mode attributes or for just the ACL.
</t>
<t>
In this section, much is made of the methods in <xref target="computemode" format="default"/>. Many requirements refer to this section.
But note that the methods have behaviors specified with
"<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>". This is intentional, to avoid invalidating
existing implementations that compute the mode according to the
withdrawn POSIX ACL draft (1003.1e draft 17), rather than by
actual permissions on owner, group, and other.
</t>
<section anchor="setattr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Setting the Mode and/or ACL Attributes</name>
<t>
In the case where a server supports the sacl or
dacl attribute, in addition to the acl attribute,
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> fail a request to set the acl
attribute simultaneously with a dacl or sacl
attribute. The error to be given is NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP.
</t>
<section anchor="setmode" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Setting Mode and not ACL</name>
<t>
When any of the nine low-order mode bits
are subject to change, either because the mode
attribute was set or because the mode_set_masked
attribute was set and the mask included one or more
bits from the nine low-order mode bits,
and no ACL attribute is explicitly
set, the acl and dacl attributes must be modified
in accordance with the updated value of those bits.
This must happen
even if the value of the low-order bits
is the same after the mode is set as before.
</t>
<t>
Note that any AUDIT or ALARM ACEs (hence any ACEs in the
sacl attribute) are unaffected by changes to the mode.
</t>
<t>
In cases in which the permissions bits are subject to
change, the acl and dacl attributes
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be modified such that the mode computed via the
method in
<xref target="computemode" format="default"/>
yields the low-order nine bits (MODE4_R*, MODE4_W*,
MODE4_X*) of the mode attribute as modified by the
attribute change. The ACL attributes
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> also be modified such that:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
If MODE4_RGRP is not set, entities explicitly
listed in the ACL other than OWNER@ and EVERYONE@
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be granted ACE4_READ_DATA.
</li>
<li>
If MODE4_WGRP is not set, entities explicitly
listed in the ACL other than OWNER@ and
EVERYONE@ <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be granted
ACE4_WRITE_DATA or ACE4_APPEND_DATA.
</li>
<li>
If MODE4_XGRP is not set, entities explicitly
listed in the ACL other than OWNER@ and EVERYONE@
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be granted ACE4_EXECUTE.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
Access mask bits other than those listed above, appearing
in ALLOW ACEs, <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> also be disabled.
</t>
<t>
Note that ACEs with the flag ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE set do
not affect the permissions of the ACL itself, nor do ACEs
of the type AUDIT and ALARM. As such, it is desirable to
leave these ACEs unmodified when modifying the ACL
attributes.
</t>
<t>
Also note that the requirement may be met by
discarding the acl and dacl, in favor of an ACL
that represents the mode and only the mode. This is
permitted, but it is preferable for a server to
preserve as much of the ACL as possible without
violating the above requirements. Discarding the
ACL makes it effectively impossible for a file
created with a mode attribute to inherit an ACL
(see <xref target="aclcreate" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="settingacl" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Setting ACL and Not Mode</name>
<t>
When setting the acl or dacl and not setting the
mode or mode_set_masked attributes, the permission
bits of the mode need to be derived from the ACL.
In this case, the ACL attribute <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be set as
given. The nine low-order bits of the mode
attribute (MODE4_R*, MODE4_W*, MODE4_X*) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
modified to match the result of the method in
<xref target="computemode" format="default"/>. The three high-order bits
of the mode (MODE4_SUID, MODE4_SGID, MODE4_SVTX)
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> remain unchanged.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="setboth" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Setting Both ACL and Mode</name>
<t>
When setting both the mode (includes use of either the
mode attribute or the mode_set_masked attribute)
and the acl or dacl attributes in the
same operation, the attributes <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be applied in this
order: mode (or mode_set_masked), then ACL. The
mode-related attribute is set as given,
then the ACL attribute is set as given, possibly changing
the final mode, as described above in
<xref target="settingacl" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Retrieving the Mode and/or ACL Attributes</name>
<t>
This section applies only to servers that support both the
mode and ACL attributes.
</t>
<t>
Some server implementations may have a concept of
"objects without ACLs", meaning that all permissions
are granted and denied according to the mode attribute and
that no ACL attribute is stored for that object. If an ACL
attribute is requested of such a server, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
return an ACL that does not conflict with the mode; that is to
say, the ACL returned <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> represent the nine low-order bits
of the mode attribute (MODE4_R*, MODE4_W*, MODE4_X*) as
described in <xref target="computemode" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
For other server implementations, the ACL attribute is always
present for every object. Such servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> store at least
the three high-order bits of the mode attribute (MODE4_SUID,
MODE4_SGID, MODE4_SVTX). The server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return a mode
attribute if one is requested, and the low-order nine bits of
the mode (MODE4_R*, MODE4_W*, MODE4_X*) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> match the result
of applying the method in
<xref target="computemode" format="default"/> to the ACL attribute.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="aclcreate" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Creating New Objects</name>
<t>
If a server supports any ACL attributes, it may use the ACL
attributes on the parent directory to compute an initial ACL
attribute for a newly created object. This will be referred to
as the inherited ACL within this section. The act of adding
one or more ACEs to the inherited ACL that are based upon ACEs
in the parent directory's ACL will be referred to as
inheriting an ACE within this section.
</t>
<t>
Implementors should standardize what the behavior of CREATE
and OPEN must be depending on the presence or absence of the
mode and ACL attributes.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
<t>If just the mode is given in the call:
</t>
<t> In this case, inheritance
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> take place, but the mode <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be applied to the
inherited ACL as described in <xref target="setmode" format="default"/>, thereby modifying the ACL.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>If just the ACL is given in the call:
</t>
<t>
In this case, inheritance <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> take place, and
the ACL as defined in the CREATE or OPEN will be set
without modification, and the mode modified as in
<xref target="settingacl" format="default"/>.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>If both mode and ACL are given in the call:
</t>
<t> In this case, inheritance
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> take place, and both attributes will be set
as described in <xref target="setboth" format="default"/>.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
If neither mode nor ACL is given in the call:
</t>
<t>
In the case where an object is being created without
any initial attributes at all, e.g., an OPEN operation
with an opentype4 of OPEN4_CREATE and a createmode4 of
EXCLUSIVE4, inheritance <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> take place (note that
EXCLUSIVE4_1 is a better choice of createmode4, since it
does permit initial attributes).
Instead, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set permissions to deny all
access to the newly created object. It is expected
that the appropriate client will set the desired
attributes in a subsequent SETATTR operation, and the
server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> allow that operation to succeed,
regardless of what permissions the object is created
with. For example, an empty ACL denies all
permissions, but the server should allow the owner's
SETATTR to succeed even though WRITE_ACL is implicitly
denied.
</t>
<t>
In other cases, inheritance <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> take place, and no
modifications to the ACL will happen. The mode
attribute, if supported, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be as computed in
<xref target="computemode" format="default"/>, with the MODE4_SUID,
MODE4_SGID, and MODE4_SVTX bits clear.
If no inheritable ACEs exist on the parent directory,
the rules for creating acl, dacl, or sacl attributes
are implementation defined.
If either the dacl or sacl attribute is supported,
then the ACL4_DEFAULTED flag <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be set on the
newly created attributes.
</t>
</li>
</ol>
<section anchor="inheritreq" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The Inherited ACL</name>
<t>
If the object being created is not a directory, the
inherited ACL <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> inherit ACEs from the parent
directory ACL unless the ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_FLAG is set.
</t>
<t>
If the object being created is a directory, the inherited
ACL should inherit all inheritable ACEs from the parent
directory, that is, those that have the ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE or
ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE flag set.
If the inheritable
ACE has ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE set but
ACE4_DIRECTORY_INHERIT_ACE is clear, the inherited ACE on
the newly created directory <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have the
ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE flag set to prevent the directory
from being affected by ACEs meant for non-directories.
</t>
<t>
When a new directory is created, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> split
any inherited ACE that is both inheritable and effective
(in other words, that has neither ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE
nor ACE4_NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT_ACE set), into two ACEs,
one with no inheritance flags and one with
ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE set. (In the case of a dacl or
sacl attribute, both of those ACEs <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> also have the
ACE4_INHERITED_ACE flag set.) This makes it simpler to
modify the effective permissions on the directory
without modifying the ACE that is to be inherited to the
new directory's children.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="auto_inherit" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Automatic Inheritance</name>
<t>
The acl attribute consists only of an array of ACEs, but
the <xref target="attrdef_sacl" format="default">sacl</xref>
and <xref target="attrdef_dacl" format="default">dacl</xref> attributes
also include an additional flag field.
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct nfsacl41 {
aclflag4 na41_flag;
nfsace4 na41_aces<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The flag field
applies to the entire sacl or dacl; three flag values are
defined:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const ACL4_AUTO_INHERIT = 0x00000001;
const ACL4_PROTECTED = 0x00000002;
const ACL4_DEFAULTED = 0x00000004;
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
and all other bits must be cleared. The
ACE4_INHERITED_ACE flag may be set in the ACEs of the sacl
or dacl (whereas it must always be cleared in the acl).
</t>
<t>
Together these features allow a server to support automatic
inheritance, which we now explain in more detail.
</t>
<t>
Inheritable ACEs are normally inherited by child objects only
at the time that the child objects are created; later
modifications to inheritable ACEs do not result in
modifications to inherited ACEs on descendants.
</t>
<t>
However, the dacl and sacl provide an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> mechanism
that allows a client application to propagate changes to
inheritable ACEs to an entire directory hierarchy.
</t>
<t>
A server that supports this performs inheritance at object
creation time in the normal way, and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set the
ACE4_INHERITED_ACE flag on any inherited ACEs as they are
added to the new object.
</t>
<t>
A client application such as an ACL editor may then propagate
changes to inheritable ACEs on a directory by recursively
traversing that directory's descendants and modifying each ACL
encountered to remove any ACEs with the ACE4_INHERITED_ACE flag
and to replace them by the new inheritable ACEs (also with the
ACE4_INHERITED_ACE flag set). It uses the existing ACE
inheritance flags in the obvious way to decide which ACEs to
propagate. (Note that it may encounter further inheritable
ACEs when descending the directory hierarchy and that those
will also need to be taken into account when propagating
inheritable ACEs to further descendants.)
</t>
<t>
The reach of this propagation may be limited in two ways:
first, automatic inheritance is not performed from any
directory ACL that has the ACL4_AUTO_INHERIT flag
cleared; and second, automatic inheritance stops wherever
an ACL with the ACL4_PROTECTED flag is set, preventing
modification of that ACL and also (if the ACL is set on
a directory) of the ACL on any of the object's descendants.
</t>
<t>
This propagation is performed independently for the sacl
and the dacl attributes; thus, the ACL4_AUTO_INHERIT and
ACL4_PROTECTED flags may be independently set for the sacl
and the dacl, and propagation of one type of acl may continue
down a hierarchy even where propagation of the other acl has
stopped.
</t>
<t>
New objects should be created with a dacl and a sacl that
both have the ACL4_PROTECTED flag cleared and the
ACL4_AUTO_INHERIT flag set to the same value as that on,
respectively, the sacl or dacl of the parent object.
</t>
<t>
Both the dacl and sacl attributes are <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, and a server
may support one without supporting the other.
</t>
<t>
A server that supports both the old acl attribute and
one or both of the new dacl or sacl attributes must do so
in such a way as to keep all three attributes consistent
with each other. Thus, the ACEs reported in the acl attribute
should be the union of the ACEs reported in the dacl and
sacl attributes, except that the ACE4_INHERITED_ACE flag must
be cleared from the ACEs in the acl. And of course a
client that queries only the acl will be unable to determine
the values of the sacl or dacl flag fields.
</t>
<t>
When a client performs a SETATTR for the acl attribute,
the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set the ACL4_PROTECTED flag to true on
both the sacl and the dacl. By using the acl attribute,
as opposed to the dacl or sacl attributes, the client signals
that it may not understand automatic inheritance, and thus
cannot be trusted to set an ACL for which automatic
inheritance would make sense.
</t>
<t>
When a client application queries an ACL, modifies it, and sets
it again, it should leave any ACEs marked with
ACE4_INHERITED_ACE unchanged, in their original order, at the
end of the ACL. If the application is unable to do this, it
should set the ACL4_PROTECTED flag. This behavior
is not enforced by servers, but violations of this rule may
lead to unexpected results when applications perform automatic
inheritance.
</t>
<t>
If a server also supports the mode attribute, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set the
mode in such a way that leaves inherited ACEs unchanged, in
their original order, at the end of the ACL. If it is unable
to do so, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set the ACL4_PROTECTED flag on the file's
dacl.
</t>
<t>Finally, in the case where the request that creates a new file
or directory does not also set permissions for that file or
directory, and there are also no ACEs to inherit from the
parent's directory, then the server's choice of ACL for the new
object is implementation-dependent. In this case, the server
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set the ACL4_DEFAULTED flag on the ACL it chooses for
the new object. An application performing automatic
inheritance takes the ACL4_DEFAULTED flag as a sign that the
ACL should be completely replaced by one generated using the
automatic inheritance rules.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="single_server_namespace" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Single-Server Namespace</name>
<t>
This section describes the NFSv4 single-server namespace.
Single-server namespaces may be presented directly to clients,
or they may be used as a basis to form larger multi-server
namespaces (e.g., site-wide or organization-wide) to be presented
to clients, as described in <xref target="NEW11" format="default"/>.
</t>
<section anchor="server_exports" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Exports</name>
<t>
On a UNIX server, the namespace describes all the files reachable by
pathnames under the root directory or "/". On a Windows server, the
namespace constitutes all the files on disks named by mapped disk
letters. NFS server administrators rarely make the entire server's
file system namespace available to NFS clients. More often, portions
of the namespace are made available via an "export" feature. In
previous versions of the NFS protocol, the root filehandle for each
export is obtained through the MOUNT protocol; the client sent a
string that identified the export name within the namespace and
the server returned the root filehandle
for that export. The MOUNT protocol also provided an EXPORTS
procedure that enumerated the server's exports.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="browsing_exports" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Browsing Exports</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol provides a root filehandle that clients can
use to obtain filehandles for the exports of a particular server,
via a series of LOOKUP operations within a COMPOUND, to traverse
a path. A common user experience is to use a graphical user interface
(perhaps a file "Open" dialog window) to find a file via progressive
browsing through a directory tree. The client must be able to move
from one export to another export via single-component, progressive
LOOKUP operations.
</t>
<t>
This style of browsing is not well supported by the NFSv3 protocol. In NFSv3, the client expects all
LOOKUP operations to remain
within a single server file system. For example, the device attribute
will not change. This prevents a client from taking namespace paths
that span exports.
</t>
<t>
In the case of NFSv3, an automounter on the client
can obtain a snapshot of the server's namespace
using the EXPORTS procedure of the MOUNT protocol.
If it understands the server's pathname syntax,
it can create an image of the server's namespace
on the client. The parts of the namespace that
are not exported by the server are filled in
with directories that might be constructed similarly
to an NFSv4.1 "pseudo file system" (see <xref target="server_pseudo_file_system" format="default"/>) that
allows the user to browse from one mounted file
system to another. There is a drawback to this
representation of the server's namespace on the
client: it is static. If the server administrator
adds a new export, the client will be unaware of it.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="server_pseudo_file_system" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Pseudo File System</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 servers avoid this namespace inconsistency by
presenting all the exports for a given server within the
framework of a single namespace for that server.
An NFSv4.1 client uses LOOKUP and READDIR
operations to browse seamlessly from one export to another.
</t>
<t>
Where there are portions of the server namespace that are not
exported, clients require some way of traversing those portions
to reach actual exported file systems. A technique that servers
may use to provide for this is to bridge the unexported portion of
the namespace via a
"pseudo file system" that provides a view of exported directories
only. A pseudo file system has a unique fsid and behaves like a
normal, read-only file system.
</t>
<t>
Based on the construction of the server's namespace, it is possible
that multiple pseudo file systems may exist. For example,
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
/a pseudo file system
/a/b real file system
/a/b/c pseudo file system
/a/b/c/d real file system
]]></artwork>
<t>
Each of the pseudo file systems is considered a separate entity and
therefore <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have its own fsid, unique among all the fsids for that
server.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Multiple Roots</name>
<t>
Certain operating environments are sometimes described as
having "multiple roots". In such environments, individual file
systems are commonly represented by disk or volume names.
NFSv4 servers for these platforms can construct a pseudo file
system above these root names so that disk letters or volume names are
simply directory names in the pseudo root.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="pseudo_fs_volatility" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Filehandle Volatility</name>
<t>
The nature of the server's pseudo file system is that it is a logical
representation of file system(s) available from the server.
Therefore, the pseudo file system is most likely constructed
dynamically when the server is first instantiated. It is expected
that the pseudo file system may not have an on-disk counterpart from
which persistent filehandles could be constructed. Even though it is
preferable that the server provide persistent filehandles for the
pseudo file system, the NFS client should expect that pseudo file
system filehandles are volatile. This can be confirmed by checking
the associated "fh_expire_type" attribute for those filehandles in
question. If the filehandles are volatile, the NFS client must be
prepared to recover a filehandle value (e.g., with a series of
LOOKUP operations) when receiving an error of NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED.
</t>
<t>
Because it is quite likely that servers will implement pseudo
file systems using volatile filehandles, clients need to be
prepared for them, rather than assuming that all filehandles
will be persistent.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Exported Root</name>
<t>
If the server's root file system is exported, one might conclude that
a pseudo file system is unneeded. This is not necessarily so. Assume the
following file systems on a server:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
/ fs1 (exported)
/a fs2 (not exported)
/a/b fs3 (exported)]]></artwork>
<t>
Because fs2 is not exported, fs3 cannot be reached with simple
LOOKUPs. The server must bridge the gap with a pseudo file system.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Mount Point Crossing</name>
<t>
The server file system environment may be constructed in such a way
that one file system contains a directory that is 'covered' or
mounted upon by a second file system. For example:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
/a/b (file system 1)
/a/b/c/d (file system 2)]]></artwork>
<t>
The pseudo file system for this server may be constructed to look
like:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
/ (place holder/not exported)
/a/b (file system 1)
/a/b/c/d (file system 2)]]></artwork>
<t>
It is the server's responsibility to present the pseudo file system
that is complete to the client. If the client sends a LOOKUP request
for the path /a/b/c/d, the server's response is the filehandle of
the root of the file system /a/b/c/d. In previous versions of the
NFS protocol,
the server would respond with the filehandle of directory
/a/b/c/d within the file system /a/b.
</t>
<t>
The NFS client will be able to determine if it crosses a server mount
point by a change in the value of the "fsid" attribute.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Policy and Namespace Presentation</name>
<t>
Because NFSv4 clients possess the ability to change the security
mechanisms used, after determining what is allowed,
by using SECINFO and SECINFO_NONAME, the server
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> present a different view of the namespace based on
the security mechanism being used by a client. Instead, it
should present a consistent view and return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
if an attempt is made to access data with an inappropriate
security mechanism.
</t>
<t>
If security considerations make it necessary to hide the existence
of a particular file system, as opposed to all of the data within
it, the server can apply the security policy of
a shared resource in the server's namespace to components of the
resource's ancestors. For example:
</t>
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
/ (place holder/not exported)
/a/b (file system 1)
/a/b/MySecretProject (file system 2)]]></artwork>
<t>
The /a/b/MySecretProject directory is a real file system and
is the shared resource.
Suppose the security policy for /a/b/MySecretProject is Kerberos
with integrity and it is desired to limit knowledge of the existence
of this file system. In this case, the
server should apply the same security policy to /a/b. This allows
for knowledge of the existence of a file system to be secured
when desirable.
</t>
<t>
For the case of the use of multiple, disjoint security mechanisms in
the server's resources, applying that sort of policy would result
in the higher-level file system not being accessible using any
security flavor.
Therefore, that sort of configuration is not compatible
with hiding the existence (as opposed to the contents) from clients
using multiple disjoint sets of security flavors.
</t>
<t>
In other circumstances, a desirable policy is for the security of a
particular object in the
server's namespace to include the union of all security mechanisms of
all direct descendants. A common and convenient practice, unless
strong security requirements dictate otherwise, is to make the
entire the pseudo file system accessible by all of the valid security
mechanisms.
</t>
<t>
Where there is concern about the security of data on the network,
clients should use strong security mechanisms to access the pseudo
file system in order to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>State Management</name>
<t>
Integrating locking into the NFS protocol necessarily causes it to be
stateful. With the inclusion of such features as share reservations,
file and directory delegations, recallable layouts, and support for
mandatory byte-range locking, the protocol becomes substantially more
dependent on proper management of state than the traditional
combination of NFS and NLM (Network Lock Manager)
<xref target="xnfs" format="default"/>. These features include expanded
locking facilities, which provide some measure of inter-client
exclusion, but the state also offers
features not readily providable using a stateless model.
There are three components to
making this state manageable:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
clear division between client and server
</li>
<li>
ability to reliably detect inconsistency in state between client
and server
</li>
<li>
simple and robust recovery mechanisms
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In this model, the server owns the state information. The client
requests changes in locks and the server responds with the changes
made. Non-client-initiated changes in locking state are infrequent.
The client receives prompt notification of such changes and can adjust
its view of the locking state to reflect the server's changes.
</t>
<t>
Individual pieces of state created by the server and passed to the
client at its request are represented by 128-bit stateids. These
stateids may represent a particular open file, a set of
byte-range locks held
by a particular owner, or a recallable delegation of privileges
to access a file in particular ways or at a particular location.
</t>
<t>
In all cases, there is a transition from the most general
information that represents a client as a whole to the eventual
lightweight stateid used for most client and server
locking interactions. The details of this transition will vary
with the type of object but it always starts with a client ID.
</t>
<section anchor="client_id" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client and Session ID</name>
<t>
A client must establish a client ID (see <xref target="Client_Identifiers" format="default"/>)
and then one or more sessionids (see <xref target="Session" format="default"/>) before
performing any operations to open, byte-range lock, delegate, or obtain
a layout for a file object.
Each session ID is associated with a specific client ID, and thus
serves as a shorthand reference to an NFSv4.1 client.
</t>
<t>
For some types of locking interactions, the client will represent
some number of internal locking entities called "owners", which
normally correspond to processes internal to the client. For
other types of locking-related objects, such as delegations and
layouts, no such intermediate entities are provided for, and the
locking-related objects are considered to be transferred
directly between the server and a unitary client.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Client and Session ID" -->
<section anchor="stateid" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stateid Definition</name>
<t>
When the server grants a lock of any type (including opens,
byte-range locks, delegations, and layouts), it responds with a
unique stateid that represents a set of locks (often a single
lock) for the same file, of the same type, and sharing the same
ownership characteristics. Thus, opens of the same file by
different open-owners each have an identifying stateid. Similarly,
each set of byte-range locks on a file owned by a specific lock-owner
has its own
identifying stateid. Delegations and layouts also have
associated stateids by which they may be referenced.
The stateid is used as a shorthand reference to a lock or set
of locks, and given a stateid, the server can determine the associated
state-owner or state-owners (in the case of an open-owner/lock-owner pair)
and the associated filehandle. When stateids are used, the current
filehandle must be the one associated with that stateid.
</t>
<t>
All stateids associated with a given client ID are associated with
a common lease that represents the claim of those stateids
and the objects they represent to be maintained
by the server. See <xref target="lease_renewal" format="default"/> for a
discussion of the lease.
</t>
<t>
The server may assign stateids independently for different clients.
A stateid with the same bit pattern for one client may designate
an entirely different set of locks for a different client. The
stateid is always interpreted with respect to the client ID associated
with the current session. Stateids apply to all sessions associated
with the given client ID, and the client may use a stateid obtained from
one session on another session associated with the same client ID.
</t>
<section anchor="stateid_types" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stateid Types</name>
<t>
With the exception of special stateids (see <xref target="special_stateid" format="default"/>),
each stateid
represents locking objects of one of a set of types defined
by the NFSv4.1 protocol. Note that in all these cases, where
we speak of guarantee, it is understood there are
situations such as a client restart, or lock revocation,
that allow the guarantee to be voided.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Stateids may represent opens of files.
</t>
<t>
Each stateid in this case represents the OPEN state for a
given client ID/open-owner/filehandle triple. Such
stateids are subject to change (with consequent
incrementing of the stateid's seqid) in response to OPENs that
result in upgrade and OPEN_DOWNGRADE operations.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Stateids may represent sets of byte-range locks.
</t>
<t>
All locks held on a particular file by a particular owner and
gotten under the aegis of a particular open file
are associated with a single stateid with the seqid
being incremented whenever LOCK and LOCKU operations affect that
set of locks.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Stateids may represent file delegations, which are
recallable guarantees by the server to the client
that other clients will not reference or
modify a particular file, until the delegation
is returned. In NFSv4.1, file delegations may be
obtained on both regular and non-regular files.
</t>
<t>
A stateid represents a single delegation held by
a client for a particular filehandle.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Stateids may represent directory delegations, which
are recallable guarantees by the server to the client
that other clients will not modify the directory,
until the delegation is returned.
</t>
<t>
A stateid represents a single delegation held by
a client for a particular directory filehandle.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Stateids may represent layouts, which are recallable
guarantees by the server to the client that particular
files may be accessed via an alternate data access
protocol at specific locations. Such access is
limited to particular sets of byte-ranges and may
proceed until those byte-ranges are reduced or the
layout is returned.
</t>
<t>
A stateid represents the set of all layouts held by a particular
client for a particular filehandle with a given
layout type. The seqid is updated as the layouts
of that set of byte-ranges change, via layout stateid changing operations such
as LAYOUTGET and LAYOUTRETURN.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="stateid_structure" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stateid Structure</name>
<t>
Stateids are divided into two fields, a 96-bit
"other" field identifying the specific set
of locks and a 32-bit "seqid" sequence value.
Except in the case of special stateids
(see <xref target="special_stateid" format="default"/>),
a particular value of the
"other" field denotes a
set of locks of the same type (for example,
byte-range locks, opens, delegations, or layouts),
for a specific file or directory, and sharing
the same ownership characteristics. The seqid
designates a specific instance of such a set of
locks, and is incremented to indicate changes in
such a set of locks, either by the addition or
deletion of locks from the set, a change in the
byte-range they apply to, or an upgrade or downgrade
in the type of one or more locks.
</t>
<t>
When such a set of locks is first created, the server returns a
stateid with seqid value of one. On subsequent
operations that modify the set of locks, the server
is required to increment the "seqid" field by one
whenever it returns a stateid for the same
state-owner/file/type combination and there is some
change in the set of locks actually designated.
In this case, the server will return a stateid with an "other" field
the same as previously used for that
state-owner/file/type combination, with an
incremented "seqid" field.
This pattern continues until the seqid is incremented
past NFS4_UINT32_MAX, and one
(not zero) is the next seqid value.
</t>
<t>
The purpose of the incrementing of the seqid
is to allow the server to
communicate to the client the order in which
operations that modified locking state associated
with a stateid have been processed and to make
it possible for the client to send requests
that are conditional on the set of locks not
having changed since the stateid in question
was returned.
</t>
<t>
Except for layout stateids (<xref target="layout_stateid" format="default"/>),
when a client sends a stateid to the server, it has two
choices with regard to the seqid sent. It may set the seqid
to zero to indicate to the server that it wishes the most
up-to-date seqid for that stateid's "other" field to be
used. This would be the common choice in the case of a
stateid sent with a READ or WRITE operation. It also may
set a non-zero value, in which case the server checks if that
seqid is the correct one. In that case, the server is
required to return NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID if the seqid is lower
than the most current value and NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID if the
seqid is greater than the most current value. This would be
the common choice in the case of stateids sent with a CLOSE
or OPEN_DOWNGRADE. Because OPENs may be sent in parallel
for the same owner, a client might close a file without
knowing that an OPEN upgrade had been done by the server,
changing the lock in question. If CLOSE were sent with a
zero seqid, the OPEN upgrade would be cancelled before the
client even received an indication that an upgrade had
happened.
</t>
<t>
When a stateid is sent by the server to the client as part of
a callback operation, it is not subject to checking for
a current seqid and returning NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID. This
is because the client is not in a position to know the
most up-to-date seqid and thus cannot verify it. Unless
specially noted, the seqid value for a stateid sent by the
server to the client as part of a callback is required
to be zero with NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID returned if it is
not.
</t>
<t>
In making comparisons between seqids, both by the client
in determining the order of operations and by the server
in determining whether the NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID is to be
returned, the possibility of the seqid being swapped
around past the NFS4_UINT32_MAX value needs to be taken
into account. When two seqid values are being compared,
the total count of slots for all sessions associated
with the current client is used to do this. When one
seqid value is less than this total slot count and
another seqid value is greater than NFS4_UINT32_MAX
minus the total slot count, the former is to be treated
as lower than the latter, despite the fact that it is
numerically greater.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Stateid Structure" -->
<section anchor="special_stateid" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Special Stateids</name>
<t>
Stateid values whose "other" field is either all zeros or all
ones are reserved. They may not be assigned by the server but
have special meanings defined by the protocol. The particular
meaning depends on whether the "other" field is all zeros or
all ones and the specific value of the "seqid" field.
</t>
<t>
The following combinations of "other" and "seqid" are defined
in NFSv4.1:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When "other" and "seqid" are both zero, the
stateid is treated as a special anonymous
stateid, which can be used in READ, WRITE,
and SETATTR requests to indicate the absence
of any OPEN state associated with the
request. When an anonymous stateid value is
used and an existing open denies the form of
access requested, then access will be denied
to the request. This stateid <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be
used on operations to data servers (<xref target="ds_ops" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
When "other" and "seqid" are both all ones,
the stateid is a special READ bypass stateid.
When this value is used in WRITE or SETATTR,
it is treated like the anonymous value.
When used in READ, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> grant
access, even if access would normally be
denied to READ operations. This stateid <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> be used on operations to data servers.
</li>
<li>
When "other" is zero and "seqid" is one,
the stateid represents the current stateid,
which is whatever value is the last stateid
returned by an operation within the COMPOUND.
In the case of an OPEN, the stateid returned
for the open file and not the delegation is
used. The stateid passed to the operation in
place of the special value has its "seqid"
value set to zero, except when the current
stateid is used by the operation CLOSE or
OPEN_DOWNGRADE. If there is no operation
in the COMPOUND that has returned a stateid
value, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the error
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID. As illustrated in <xref target="csid_example4" format="default"/>, if the value of a
current stateid is a special stateid and the
stateid of an operation's arguments has
"other" set to zero and "seqid" set to one,
then the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the error
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</li>
<li>
When "other" is zero and "seqid" is NFS4_UINT32_MAX,
the stateid represents a reserved stateid
value defined to be invalid. When this
stateid is used, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the error
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If a stateid value is used that has all zeros or all ones in the
"other" field but does not match one of the cases above, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the error NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</t>
<t>
Special stateids, unlike other stateids, are not associated with
individual client IDs or filehandles and can be used with all valid
client IDs and filehandles. In the case of a special
stateid designating the current stateid, the current stateid
value substituted for the special stateid is associated with a
particular client ID and filehandle, and so, if it is used
where the current filehandle does not match that associated with the current
stateid, the operation to which the stateid is passed will return
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Special Stateids" -->
<section anchor="stateid_lifetime" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stateid Lifetime and Validation</name>
<t>
Stateids must remain valid until either a client restart or a
server restart or until the client returns all of the locks
associated with the stateid by means of an operation such as
CLOSE or DELEGRETURN.
If the locks are lost due to revocation, as long
as the client ID is valid, the stateid remains
a valid designation of that revoked state until
the client frees it by using FREE_STATEID.
Stateids associated
with byte-range locks are an exception. They remain valid even
if a LOCKU frees all remaining locks, so long as the open file
with which they are associated remains open, unless the client
frees the stateids via the FREE_STATEID operation.
</t>
<t>
It should be noted that there are situations in which the
client's locks become invalid, without the client requesting
they be returned. These include lease expiration and a number
of forms of lock revocation within the lease period. It is
important to note that in these situations, the stateid remains
valid and the client can use it to determine the disposition of
the associated lost locks.
</t>
<t>
An "other" value must never be reused for a different purpose
(i.e., different filehandle, owner, or type of locks) within the
context of a single client ID. A server may retain the "other"
value for the same purpose beyond the point where it may otherwise
be freed, but if it does so, it must maintain "seqid" continuity
with previous values.
</t>
<t>
One mechanism that may be used to satisfy the requirement that the
server recognize invalid and out-of-date stateids is for
the server to divide the "other" field of the stateid into two
fields.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
an index into a table of locking-state structures.
</li>
<li>
a generation number that is incremented on each allocation
of a table entry for a particular use.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
And then store in each table entry,
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
the client ID with which the stateid is associated.
</li>
<li>
the current generation number for the (at most one)
valid stateid sharing this index value.
</li>
<li>
the filehandle of the file on which the locks are taken.
</li>
<li>
an indication of the type of stateid (open, byte-range lock,
file delegation, directory delegation, layout).
</li>
<li>
the last "seqid" value returned corresponding to the current
"other" value.
</li>
<li>
an indication of the current status of the locks
associated with this stateid, in particular,
whether these have been revoked and if so, for what reason.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
With this information, an incoming stateid can be validated and
the appropriate error returned when necessary. Special and
non-special stateids are handled separately. (See
<xref target="special_stateid" format="default"/> for a discussion of special
stateids.)
</t>
<t>
Note that stateids are implicitly qualified by the current client
ID, as derived from the client ID associated with the current
session. Note, however, that the semantics of the session will
prevent stateids associated with a previous client or server
instance from being analyzed by this procedure.
</t>
<t>
If server restart has resulted in an invalid
client ID or a session ID that is invalid, SEQUENCE will return
an error and the operation that takes a stateid as an argument will never
be processed.
</t>
<t>
If there has been a server restart where there is a persistent
session and all leased state has been lost, then the session
in question will, although valid, be marked as dead, and any
operation not satisfied by means of the reply cache will
receive the error NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, and thus not be
processed as indicated below.
</t>
<t>
When a stateid is being tested and the "other" field is all
zeros or all ones, a check that
the "other" and "seqid" fields match a defined combination for
a special stateid is done and the results determined as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the "other" and "seqid" fields do not match a defined
combination associated with a special stateid, the error
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID is returned.
</li>
<li>
If the special stateid is one designating the current
stateid and there is a current stateid, then the current
stateid is substituted for the special stateid and the
checks appropriate to non-special stateids are performed.
</li>
<li>
If the combination is valid in general but is not
appropriate to the context in which the stateid is used
(e.g., an all-zero stateid is used when an OPEN stateid
is required in a LOCK operation), the error
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID is also returned.
</li>
<li>
Otherwise, the check is completed and the special stateid
is accepted as valid.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When a stateid is being tested,
and the "other" field is neither all zeros nor all ones, the
following procedure could be used to
validate an incoming stateid and return an appropriate error,
when necessary, assuming that the "other" field would be divided
into a table index and an entry generation.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the table index field is outside the range of the
associated table, return NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</li>
<li>
If the selected table entry is of a different generation than
that specified in the incoming stateid, return
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</li>
<li>
If the selected table entry does not match the current
filehandle, return NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</li>
<li>
If the client ID in the table entry does not match the
client ID associated with the current session,
return NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</li>
<li>
If the stateid represents revoked state, then return
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED, NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED, or
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED, as appropriate.
</li>
<li>
If the stateid type is not valid for the context in which the
stateid appears, return NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
Note that a stateid may be valid in general, as would be
reported by the TEST_STATEID operation, but be invalid for
a particular operation, as, for example, when a stateid
that doesn't represent byte-range locks is passed to
the non-from_open case of LOCK or to LOCKU, or when a stateid
that does not represent an open is passed to CLOSE or
OPEN_DOWNGRADE. In such cases, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</li>
<li>
If the "seqid" field is not zero and it is greater
than the current sequence value corresponding to the
current "other" field, return NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</li>
<li>
If the "seqid" field is not zero and it is less
than the current sequence value corresponding to the
current "other" field, return NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID.
</li>
<li>
Otherwise, the stateid is valid and the table entry
should contain any additional information about the
type of stateid and information associated with that
particular type of stateid, such as the associated
set of locks, e.g., open-owner and
lock-owner information, as well as information on the
specific locks, e.g., open modes and byte-ranges.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Stateid Lifetime and Validation" -->
<section anchor="stateid_use" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stateid Use for I/O Operations</name>
<t>
Clients performing I/O operations need to select an
appropriate stateid based on the
locks (including opens and delegations) held by the client and
the various types of state-owners sending the I/O requests.
SETATTR operations that change the file size are treated
like I/O operations in this regard.
</t>
<t>
The following rules, applied in order of decreasing priority,
govern the selection of the appropriate stateid. In following
these rules, the client will only consider locks of which it
has actually received notification by an appropriate operation
response or callback. Note that the
rules are slightly different in the case of I/O to data servers
when file layouts are being
used (see <xref target="global_stateid" format="default"/>).
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the client holds a delegation for the file in question, the
delegation stateid <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used.
</li>
<li>
Otherwise, if the entity corresponding to the lock-owner (e.g., a process)
sending the I/O has a byte-range lock stateid for the associated open file,
then the byte-range lock stateid for that lock-owner and open file <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
be used.
</li>
<li>
If there is no byte-range lock stateid, then the OPEN stateid for the open
file in question <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used.
</li>
<li>
Finally, if none of the above apply, then a special stateid
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Ignoring these rules may result in situations in which the server
does not have information necessary to properly process the request.
For example, when mandatory byte-range locks are in effect, if the
stateid does not indicate the proper lock-owner, via a lock stateid,
a request might be avoidably rejected.
</t>
<t>
The server however should not try to enforce these ordering rules
and should use whatever information is available to properly process
I/O requests. In particular, when a client has a delegation for a given file, it
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> take note of this fact in processing a request, even if it is
sent with a special stateid.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Stateid Use for I/O Operations" -->
<section anchor="stateid_use_sa" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stateid Use for SETATTR Operations</name>
<t>
Because each operation is associated with a session ID and from that
the clientid can be determined, operations do not need to
include a stateid for the server to be able to determine whether
they should cause a delegation to be recalled or are to be
treated as done within the scope of the delegation.
</t>
<t>
In the case of SETATTR operations, a stateid is present. In cases
other than those that set the file size, the client may send either
a special stateid or, when a delegation is held for the file in
question, a delegation stateid. While the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> validate
the stateid and may use the stateid to optimize the determination
as to whether a delegation is held, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> note the presence of
a delegation even when a special stateid is sent, and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> accept a
valid delegation stateid when sent.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Stateid Use for SETATTR Operations" -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Stateid Definition" -->
<section anchor="lease_renewal" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Lease Renewal</name>
<t>
Each client/server pair, as represented by a client ID, has a single
lease.
The purpose of the lease is to allow the client to indicate
to the server, in a low-overhead way, that it is active, and
thus that the server is to retain the client's locks. This arrangement
allows the server to remove stale locking-related objects
that are held by a client that has crashed or is otherwise
unreachable, once the relevant lease expires. This in turn allows
other clients to obtain conflicting locks without being
delayed indefinitely by inactive or unreachable clients.
It is not a
mechanism for cache consistency and lease
renewals may not be denied if the lease interval has not expired.
</t>
<t>
Since each session is associated with a specific
client (identified by the client's client ID), any
operation sent on that session is an indication
that the associated client is reachable. When a
request is sent for a given session, successful
execution of a SEQUENCE operation (or successful
retrieval of the result of SEQUENCE from the reply
cache) on an unexpired lease will result in the
lease being implicitly renewed, for the standard
renewal period (equal to the lease_time attribute).
</t>
<t>
If the client ID's lease has not expired when the
server receives a SEQUENCE operation, then the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> renew the lease. If the client ID's lease has expired
when the server receives a SEQUENCE operation, the
server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> renew the lease; this depends on whether
any state was revoked as a result of the client's
failure to renew the lease before expiration.
</t>
<t>
Absent other activity that would renew the lease, a COMPOUND
consisting of a single SEQUENCE operation will suffice. The
client should also take communication-related delays into
account and take steps to ensure that the renewal messages
actually reach the server in good time. For example:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When trunking is in effect, the client should
consider sending multiple requests on different
connections, in order to ensure that renewal
occurs, even in the event of blockage in the
path used for one of those connections.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Transport retransmission delays might become
so large as to approach or exceed the length
of the lease period. This may be particularly
likely when the server is unresponsive due to
a restart; see <xref target="reclaim_locks" format="default"/>. If the client implementation is not careful,
transport retransmission delays can result in the
client failing to detect a server restart before
the grace period ends. The scenario is that the
client is using a transport with exponential
backoff, such that the maximum retransmission
timeout exceeds both the grace period and the
lease_time attribute. A network partition causes
the client's connection's retransmission interval
to back off, and even after the partition heals,
the next transport-level retransmission is sent
after the server has restarted and its grace
period ends.
</t>
<t>
The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> either recover from the ensuing
NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE errors or it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ensure that,
despite transport-level retransmission intervals
that exceed the lease_time, a SEQUENCE operation is sent
that renews the lease before expiration. The client can achieve this
by associating a new connection with the session,
and sending a SEQUENCE operation on it. However, if
the attempt to establish a new connection is delayed
for some reason (e.g., exponential backoff of the connection
establishment packets), the client will have to
abort the connection establishment attempt before
the lease expires, and attempt to reconnect.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the server renews the lease upon receiving
a SEQUENCE operation, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> allow the lease
to expire while the rest of the operations
in the COMPOUND procedure's request are still
executing. Once the last operation has finished, and
the response to COMPOUND has been sent, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the lease to expire no sooner than the
sum of current time and the value of the lease_time attribute.
</t>
<t>
A client ID's lease can expire when it has been
at least the lease interval (lease_time) since the
last lease-renewing SEQUENCE operation was sent
on any of the client ID's sessions and there
are no active COMPOUND operations on any such sessions.
</t>
<t>
Because the SEQUENCE operation is the basic mechanism to renew
a lease, and because it must be done at least once for each
lease period, it is the natural mechanism whereby the server
will inform the client of changes in the lease status that the
client needs to be informed of. The client should inspect the
status flags (sr_status_flags) returned by sequence and take
the appropriate action (see
<xref target="OP_SEQUENCE_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/> for details).
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The status bits SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN and
SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN_SESSION indicate problems with
the backchannel that the client may need to address
in order to receive callback requests.
</li>
<li>
The status bits SEQ4_STATUS_CB_GSS_CONTEXTS_EXPIRING and
SEQ4_STATUS_CB_GSS_CONTEXTS_EXPIRED indicate
problems with GSS contexts or RPCSEC_GSS handles
for the backchannel that the
client might have to address in order to allow callback requests
to be sent.
</li>
<li>
The status bits SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED,
SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_SOME_STATE_REVOKED,
SEQ4_STATUS_ADMIN_STATE_REVOKED, and
SEQ4_STATUS_RECALLABLE_STATE_REVOKED notify the
client of lock revocation events. When these bits
are set, the client should use TEST_STATEID to find
what stateids have been revoked and use FREE_STATEID
to acknowledge loss of the associated state.
</li>
<li>
The status bit SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVE
indicates that
responsibility for lease renewal has been transferred to
one or more new servers.
</li>
<li>
The status bit SEQ4_STATUS_RESTART_RECLAIM_NEEDED
indicates that due to server
restart the client must reclaim locking state.
</li>
<li>
The status bit SEQ4_STATUS_BACKCHANNEL_FAULT
indicates that the server has encountered an unrecoverable fault
with the backchannel (e.g., it has lost track of a
sequence ID for a slot in the backchannel).
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Lease Renewal" -->
<section anchor="lock_crash_recovery" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Crash Recovery</name>
<t>
A critical requirement in crash recovery is that both the client
and the server know when the other has failed. Additionally, it
is required that a client sees a consistent view of data across
server restarts. All READ and WRITE operations that
may have been queued within the client or network buffers must
wait until the client has successfully recovered the locks
protecting the READ and WRITE operations. Any that reach the
server before the server can safely determine that the client
has recovered enough locking state to be sure that such
operations can be safely processed must be rejected.
This will happen because either:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The state presented is no longer valid since it is
associated with a now invalid client ID. In this case, the
client will receive either an NFS4ERR_BADSESSION or
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION error, and any attempt to attach a new
session to that invalid client ID will result in an
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID error.
</li>
<li>
Subsequent recovery of locks may make execution of the
operation inappropriate (NFS4ERR_GRACE).
</li>
</ul>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Failure and Recovery</name>
<t>
In the event that a client fails, the server may release the
client's locks when the associated lease has expired. Conflicting
locks from another client may only be granted after this lease
expiration. As discussed in <xref target="lease_renewal" format="default"/>, when
a client has not failed and re-establishes its lease before expiration
occurs, requests for conflicting locks will not be granted.
</t>
<t>
To minimize client delay upon restart, lock requests are associated
with an instance of the client by a client-supplied verifier. This
verifier is part of the client_owner4 sent in the initial
EXCHANGE_ID call made by the client.
The server returns a client ID as a result of the EXCHANGE_ID
operation. The client then confirms the use of the client ID by
establishing a session associated with that client ID (see
<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/> for a
description of how this is done). All locks,
including opens, byte-range locks, delegations, and layouts obtained
by sessions using that client ID, are associated with that client ID.
</t>
<t>
Since the verifier will be changed by the client upon each
initialization, the server can compare a new verifier to the verifier
associated with currently held locks and determine that they do not
match. This signifies the client's new instantiation and subsequent
loss (upon confirmation of the new client ID) of locking
state. As a result, the server is free to release all
locks held that are associated with the old client ID that was
derived from the old verifier. At this point, conflicting locks from
other clients, kept waiting while the lease had not yet expired, can
be granted. In addition, all stateids associated with the old client ID
can also be freed, as they are no longer reference-able.
</t>
<t>
Note that the verifier must have the same uniqueness properties as the
verifier for the COMMIT operation.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Client Failure and Recovery" -->
<section anchor="server_failure" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Failure and Recovery</name>
<t>
If the server loses locking state (usually as a result of a restart), it must allow clients time to discover this fact and
re-establish the lost locking state. The client must be able to
re-establish the locking state without having the server deny valid
requests because the server has granted conflicting access to another
client. Likewise, if there is a possibility that clients have not
yet re-established their locking state for a file and that
such locking state might make it invalid to perform READ or
WRITE operations. For example, if mandatory locks are a possibility,
the server must disallow READ and WRITE operations for that file.
</t>
<t>
A client can determine that loss of locking
state has occurred via several methods.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
When a SEQUENCE (most common) or other operation returns
NFS4ERR_BADSESSION, this may mean that the session has
been destroyed but the client ID is still valid.
The client sends a CREATE_SESSION request with the
client ID to re-establish the session. If
CREATE_SESSION fails with NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID,
the client must establish a new client ID (see
<xref target="client_id" format="default"/>) and re-establish its
lock state with the new client ID, after the CREATE_SESSION
operation succeeds (see <xref target="reclaim_locks" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
When a SEQUENCE (most common) or other operation on a
persistent session returns NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION, this indicates
that a session is no longer usable for new, i.e., not satisfied
from the reply cache, operations. Once all pending operations
are determined to be either performed before the retry or not
performed, the client sends a CREATE_SESSION request with the
client ID to re-establish the session. If
CREATE_SESSION fails with NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID,
the client must establish a new client ID (see
<xref target="client_id" format="default"/>) and re-establish its
lock state after the CREATE_SESSION, with the
new client ID, succeeds
(<xref target="reclaim_locks" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
When an operation, neither SEQUENCE nor preceded by SEQUENCE (for
example, CREATE_SESSION, DESTROY_SESSION), returns
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> establish
a new client ID (<xref target="client_id" format="default"/>) and
re-establish its lock state (<xref target="reclaim_locks" format="default"/>).
</li>
</ol>
<section anchor="reclaim_locks" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>State Reclaim</name>
<t>
When state information and the associated locks are lost
as a result of a server restart, the protocol must provide
a way to cause that state to be re-established. The
approach used is to define, for most types of locking
state (layouts are an exception), a request whose function
is to allow the client to
re-establish on the server a lock first obtained from a
previous instance. Generally, these requests are variants
of the requests normally used to create locks of that type
and are referred to as "reclaim-type" requests, and the process
of re-establishing such locks is referred to as "reclaiming"
them.
</t>
<t anchor="read_write_grace">
Because each client must have an opportunity to reclaim
all of the locks that it has without the possibility that
some other client will be granted a conflicting lock,
a "grace period" is devoted
to the reclaim process. During this period, requests
creating client IDs and
sessions are handled normally, but locking requests are
subject to special restrictions. Only
reclaim-type locking requests are allowed, unless the
server can reliably determine (through state
persistently maintained across restart instances) that
granting any such lock cannot possibly conflict with a
subsequent reclaim.
When a request is made to obtain
a new lock (i.e., not a reclaim-type request) during the
grace period and such a determination cannot be made,
the server must return the error NFS4ERR_GRACE.
</t>
<t>
Once a session is established using the new client ID, the
client will use reclaim-type locking requests (e.g., LOCK
operations with reclaim set to TRUE and OPEN operations with a
claim type of CLAIM_PREVIOUS; see
<xref target="open_br_reclaim" format="default"/>) to re-establish its locking
state. Once this is done, or if there is no such locking
state to reclaim, the client sends a global RECLAIM_COMPLETE
operation, i.e., one with the rca_one_fs argument set to FALSE, to
indicate that it has reclaimed all of the locking state that
it will reclaim. Once a client sends such a RECLAIM_COMPLETE
operation, it may attempt non-reclaim locking operations,
although it might get an NFS4ERR_GRACE status result from each such operation until
the period of special handling is over.
See <xref target="SEC11-EFF-lock" format="default"/> for a discussion of the
analogous handling lock reclamation in the case of file systems
transitioning from server to server.
</t>
<t>
During the grace period, the server must reject READ
and WRITE operations
and non-reclaim locking requests (i.e., other LOCK
and OPEN operations) with an error of NFS4ERR_GRACE,
unless it can guarantee that these may be done
safely, as described below.
</t>
<t>
The grace period may last until all clients that are known to
possibly have had locks have done a global RECLAIM_COMPLETE operation, indicating
that they have finished reclaiming the locks they held before
the server restart. This means that a client that has done a
RECLAIM_COMPLETE must be prepared to receive an NFS4ERR_GRACE
when attempting to acquire new locks.
In order for the server to know that all clients with possible prior
lock state have done a RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
the server must maintain in stable
storage a list clients that may have such locks. The server
may also terminate the grace period before all clients have
done a global RECLAIM_COMPLETE. The server <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> terminate the
grace period before a time equal to the lease period in order
to give clients an opportunity to find out about the server
restart, as a result of sending requests on associated
sessions with a frequency governed by the lease time.
Note that when a client does not send such requests (or they
are sent by the client but not received by the server),
it is possible for the grace period to expire before the client
finds out that the server restart has occurred.
</t>
<t>
Some additional time in
order to allow a client to
establish a new client ID and session and to effect lock
reclaims may be added to the lease time. Note that
analogous rules apply to
file system-specific grace periods discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-lock" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
If the server can reliably determine that granting a non-reclaim
request will not conflict with reclamation of locks by other
clients, the NFS4ERR_GRACE error does not have to be returned
even within the grace period, although NFS4ERR_GRACE must always
be returned to clients attempting a non-reclaim lock request
before doing their own global RECLAIM_COMPLETE.
For the server to be able
to service READ and WRITE operations during the grace period, it must
again be able to guarantee that no possible conflict could arise
between a potential reclaim locking request and the READ or WRITE
operation. If the server is unable to offer that guarantee, the
NFS4ERR_GRACE error must be returned to the client.
</t>
<t>
For a server to provide simple, valid handling during the grace
period, the easiest method is to simply reject all non-reclaim locking
requests and READ and WRITE operations by returning the NFS4ERR_GRACE
error. However, a server may keep information about granted locks in
stable storage. With this information, the server could determine if
a locking, READ or WRITE operation can be safely processed.
</t>
<t>
For example, if the server maintained on stable storage summary
information on whether mandatory locks exist, either mandatory
byte-range locks, or share reservations specifying deny modes,
many requests could be allowed during the grace period. If it
is known that no such share reservations exist, OPEN request that
do not specify deny modes may be safely granted. If, in addition,
it is known that no mandatory byte-range locks exist, either
through information stored on stable storage or simply because
the server does not support such locks, READ and WRITE operations
may be safely processed during the grace period.
Another important case is where it is known that no mandatory
byte-range locks exist, either because the server does not
provide support for them or because their absence is known
from persistently recorded data. In this case, READ and
WRITE operations specifying stateids derived from reclaim-type
operations may be validly processed during the grace period
because of the fact that the valid reclaim ensures that no lock
subsequently granted can prevent the I/O.
</t>
<t>
To reiterate, for a server that allows non-reclaim lock and I/O
requests to be processed during the grace period, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> determine
that no lock subsequently reclaimed will be rejected and that no lock
subsequently reclaimed would have prevented any I/O operation
processed during the grace period.
</t>
<t>
Clients should be prepared for the return of NFS4ERR_GRACE errors for
non-reclaim lock and I/O requests. In this case, the client should
employ a retry mechanism for the request. A delay (on the order of
several seconds) between retries should be used to avoid overwhelming
the server. Further discussion of the general issue is included in
<xref target="Floyd" format="default"/>. The client must account for the server that
can perform I/O and non-reclaim locking requests within the grace period
as well as those that cannot do so.
</t>
<t>
A reclaim-type locking request outside the server's grace period
can only succeed if the server can guarantee that no conflicting
lock or I/O request has been granted since restart.
</t>
<t>
A server may, upon restart, establish a new value for the lease
period. Therefore, clients should, once a new client ID is
established, refetch the lease_time attribute and use it as the basis
for lease renewal for the lease associated with that server. However,
the server must establish, for this restart event, a grace period at
least as long as the lease period for the previous server
instantiation. This allows the client state obtained during the
previous server instance to be reliably re-established.
</t>
<t>
The possibility exists that, because of server configuration
events, the client will be communicating with a server
different than the one on which the locks were obtained, as
shown by the combination of eir_server_scope and
eir_server_owner. This leads to the issue of if and when
the client should attempt to reclaim locks previously obtained
on what is being reported as a different server. The rules
to resolve this question are as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the server scope is different, the client should not
attempt to reclaim locks. In this situation, no lock
reclaim is possible. Any attempt to re-obtain the locks
with non-reclaim operations is problematic since there is
no guarantee that the existing filehandles will be recognized
by the new server, or that if recognized, they denote the
same objects. It is best to treat the locks as having been
revoked by the reconfiguration event.
</li>
<li>
If the server scope is the same, the client should attempt
to reclaim locks, even if the eir_server_owner value is
different. In this situation, it is the responsibility
of the server to return NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE if it cannot
provide correct support for lock reclaim operations,
including the prevention of edge conditions.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The eir_server_owner field is not used in making this
determination. Its function is to specify trunking
possibilities for the client (see <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>)
and not to control lock reclaim.
</t>
<section anchor="reclaim_security_considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Considerations for State Reclaim</name>
<t>
During the grace period, a client can reclaim state that it believes or
asserts it had before the server restarted. Unless the server
maintained a complete record of all the state the client had,
the server has little choice but to trust the client. (Of course,
if the server maintained a complete record, then it would not
have to force the client to reclaim state after server restart.)
While the server has to trust the client to tell the truth, the
negative consequences for security are limited to enabling
denial-of-service attacks in situations in which AUTH_SYS is
supported. The
fundamental rule for the server when processing reclaim requests
is that it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> grant the reclaim if an equivalent non-reclaim
request would not be granted during steady state due to access
control or access conflict issues. For example, an OPEN request
during a reclaim will be refused with NFS4ERR_ACCESS if the principal making
the request does not have access to open the file according to the
discretionary ACL (<xref target="attrdef_dacl" format="default"/>) on the file.
</t>
<t>
Nonetheless, it is possible that a client operating in error or
maliciously could, during reclaim, prevent another client from
reclaiming access to state. For example, an attacker could
send an OPEN reclaim operation with a deny mode that prevents
another client from reclaiming the OPEN state it had before the
server restarted.
The attacker could perform the same denial of service during
steady state prior to server restart, as long as the
attacker had permissions. Given that the attack
vectors are equivalent, the grace period does not offer any
additional opportunity for denial of service, and any concerns
about this attack vector, whether during grace or steady state,
are addressed the same way: use RPCSEC_GSS for authentication
and limit access to the file only to principals that the owner of
the file trusts.
</t>
<t>
Note that if prior to restart the server had client
IDs with the EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) capability set, then the server
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> record in stable storage the client owner and the
principal that established the client ID via EXCHANGE_ID.
If the server does not, then there is a risk a client will
be unable to reclaim state if it does not have a credential
for a principal that was originally authorized to
establish the state.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Security Considerations for State Reclaim" -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] "State Reclaim" -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Server Failure and Recovery" -->
<section anchor="network_partitions_and_recovery" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Network Partitions and Recovery</name>
<t>
If the duration of a network partition is greater than the lease
period provided by the server, the server will not have received a
lease renewal from the client. If this occurs, the server may free
all locks held for the client or it may allow the lock state to
remain for a considerable period, subject to the constraint that
if a request for a conflicting lock is made, locks associated with
an expired lease do not prevent such a conflicting lock from being
granted but <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be revoked as necessary so as to avoid interfering with
such conflicting requests.
</t>
<t>
If the server chooses to delay freeing of lock state until there
is a conflict, it may either free all of the client's locks once
there is a conflict or it may only revoke the minimum set of locks
necessary to allow conflicting requests. When it adopts the
finer-grained approach, it must revoke all locks associated with a
given stateid, even if the conflict is with only a subset of locks.
</t>
<t>
When the server chooses to free all of a client's lock state, either
immediately upon lease expiration or as a result of the first
attempt to obtain a conflicting a lock, the server may report the
loss of lock state in a number of ways.
</t>
<t>
The server may choose to invalidate the session and the associated
client ID. In this case, once the client can communicate
with the server, it will receive an NFS4ERR_BADSESSION error. Upon
attempting to create a new session, it would get an
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID. Upon creating the new client ID and new
session, the client will attempt to reclaim locks. Normally, the
server will not allow the client to reclaim locks, because the
server will not be in its recovery grace period.
</t>
<t>
Another possibility is for the server to maintain the session and
client ID but for all stateids held by the
client to become invalid or stale. Once the client can reach
the server after such a network partition, the status returned by
the SEQUENCE operation will indicate a loss of locking state; i.e.,
the flag SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED will be set in
sr_status_flags. In
addition, all I/O submitted by the
client with the now invalid stateids will fail with the server
returning the error NFS4ERR_EXPIRED. Once the client learns of
the loss of locking state, it
will suitably notify the applications that held the invalidated
locks. The client should then take action to free invalidated
stateids, either by establishing a new client ID using a new
verifier or by doing a FREE_STATEID operation to release each
of the invalidated stateids.
</t>
<t>
When the server adopts a finer-grained approach to revocation
of locks when a client's lease has expired, only a subset of stateids
will normally become invalid during a network partition.
When the client can communicate with the server after such a
network partition heals, the status returned by the SEQUENCE
operation will indicate a partial loss of locking state
(SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_SOME_STATE_REVOKED).
In addition, operations, including I/O submitted by the
client, with the now invalid stateids will fail with the server
returning the error NFS4ERR_EXPIRED. Once the client learns of
the loss of locking state, it will use the TEST_STATEID operation
on all of its stateids to
determine which locks have been lost and then
suitably notify the applications that held the invalidated
locks. The client can then release the invalidated locking
state and acknowledge the revocation of the associated locks
by doing a FREE_STATEID operation on each of the invalidated
stateids.
</t>
<t>
When a network partition is combined with a server restart, there are
edge conditions that place requirements on the server in order to
avoid silent data corruption following the server restart. Two of these
edge conditions are known, and are discussed below.
</t>
<t>
The first edge condition arises as a result of the scenarios such as
the following:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Client A acquires a lock.
</li>
<li>
Client A and server experience mutual network partition, such that
client A is unable to renew its lease.
</li>
<li>
Client A's lease expires, and the server releases the lock.
</li>
<li>
Client B acquires a lock that would have conflicted
with that of client A.
</li>
<li>
Client B releases its lock.
</li>
<li>
Server restarts.
</li>
<li>
Network partition between client A and server heals.
</li>
<li>
Client A connects to a new server instance and finds out about
server restart.
</li>
<li>
Client A reclaims its lock within the server's grace period.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
Thus, at the final step, the server has erroneously granted client A's
lock reclaim. If client B modified the object the lock was protecting,
client A will experience object corruption.
</t>
<t>
The second known edge condition arises in situations such as the following:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Client A acquires one or more locks.
</li>
<li>
Server restarts.
</li>
<li>
Client A and server experience mutual network
partition, such that client A is unable to reclaim
all of its locks within the grace period.
</li>
<li>
Server's reclaim grace period ends. Client A has either
no locks or an incomplete set of locks known to the server.
</li>
<li>
Client B acquires a lock that would have conflicted
with a lock of client A that was not reclaimed.
</li>
<li>
Client B releases the lock.
</li>
<li>
Server restarts a second time.
</li>
<li>
Network partition between client A and server heals.
</li>
<li>
Client A connects to new server instance and finds out about
server restart.
</li>
<li>
Client A reclaims its lock within the server's
grace period.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
As with the first edge condition, the final step of the scenario of
the second edge condition has the server erroneously granting client
A's lock reclaim.
</t>
<t>
Solving the first and second edge conditions requires either that the server
always assumes after it restarts that some edge condition
occurs, and thus returns NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE for all reclaim attempts, or that the server
record some information in stable storage. The amount
of information the
server records in stable storage is in inverse proportion to how harsh
the server intends to be whenever edge conditions arise.
The server
that is completely tolerant of all edge conditions will record in
stable storage every lock that is acquired, removing the lock record
from stable storage only when the lock is released.
For the two edge conditions discussed above, the harshest a
server can be, and still support a grace period for reclaims, requires
that the server record in stable storage some minimal
information. For example, a server implementation could, for each
client, save in stable storage a record containing:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
the co_ownerid field from the client_owner4 presented in the
EXCHANGE_ID operation.
</li>
<li>
a boolean that indicates if the client's lease expired
or if there was administrative intervention (see
<xref target="server_revocation" format="default"/>) to revoke
a byte-range lock, share reservation, or delegation and
there has been no acknowledgment, via FREE_STATEID,
of such revocation.
</li>
<li>
a boolean that indicates whether the client may have locks
that it believes to be reclaimable in situations in which the
grace period was terminated, making the server's view of
lock reclaimability suspect. The server will set this for
any client record in stable storage where the client has
not done a suitable RECLAIM_COMPLETE (global or file
system-specific depending on the target of the lock
request) before it grants any new (i.e., not reclaimed)
lock to any client.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Assuming the above record keeping, for the first edge condition, after
the server restarts, the record that client A's lease expired means
that another client could have acquired a conflicting byte-range lock,
share reservation, or delegation. Hence, the server must reject a
reclaim from client A with the error NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE.
</t>
<t>
For the second edge condition, after the server restarts for a second
time, the indication that the client had not completed its
reclaims at the time at which the grace period ended
means that the server must reject a reclaim from client A
with the error NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE.
</t>
<t>
When either edge condition occurs, the client's attempt to reclaim
locks will result in the error NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE. When this is
received, or after the client restarts with no lock state, the
client will send a global RECLAIM_COMPLETE. When
the RECLAIM_COMPLETE is received, the server and client are
again in agreement regarding reclaimable locks and both booleans in persistent
storage can be reset, to be set again only when there is a subsequent
event that causes lock reclaim operations to be questionable.
</t>
<t>
Regardless of the level and approach to record keeping, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> implement one of the following strategies (which apply to
reclaims of share reservations, byte-range locks, and delegations):
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Reject all reclaims with NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE. This
is extremely unforgiving, but necessary if the server does not
record lock state in stable storage.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Record sufficient state in stable storage such that
all known edge conditions involving server restart,
including the two noted in this section, are
detected. It is acceptable to erroneously recognize an edge condition
and not allow a reclaim, when, with sufficient knowledge, it
would be allowed. The error the server would return in this
case is NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE. Note that it is not known if there are other
edge conditions.
</t>
<t>
In the event that, after a server restart, the server
determines there is unrecoverable damage or
corruption to the information in stable storage, then for
all clients and/or locks that may be affected, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE.
</t>
</li>
</ol>
<t>
A mandate for the client's handling of the NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE error is
outside the scope of this specification, since the strategies for such
handling are very dependent on the client's operating environment.
However, one potential approach is described below.
</t>
<t>
When the client receives NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE, it could examine the change
attribute of the objects for which the client is trying to reclaim state,
and use that to determine whether to re-establish the state via normal
OPEN or LOCK operations. This is acceptable provided that the client's
operating environment allows it. In other words, the client
implementor is advised to document for his users the behavior. The
client could also inform the application that its byte-range lock or share
reservations (whether or not they were delegated) have been lost, such
as via a UNIX signal, a Graphical User Interface (GUI) pop-up window, etc.
See <xref target="data_caching_revocation" format="default"/>
for a discussion of what the client should do
for dealing with unreclaimed delegations on client state.
</t>
<t>
For further discussion of revocation of locks, see
<xref target="server_revocation" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Network Partitions and Recovery" -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Crash Recovery" -->
<section anchor="server_revocation" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Revocation of Locks</name>
<t>
At any point, the server can revoke locks held by a client, and the
client must be prepared for this event. When the client detects that
its locks have been or may have been revoked, the client is
responsible for validating the state information between itself and
the server. Validating locking state for the client means that it
must verify or reclaim state for each lock currently held.
</t>
<t>
The first occasion of lock revocation is upon server
restart. Note that this includes situations
in which sessions are persistent and locking state is
lost. In this class of instances, the client will
receive an error (NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID) on an
operation that takes client ID, usually as part of
recovery in response to a problem with the current
session), and the client will proceed
with normal crash recovery as described in the <xref target="reclaim_locks" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
The second occasion of lock revocation is the inability to renew the lease
before expiration, as discussed in
<xref target="network_partitions_and_recovery" format="default"/>. While this is
considered a rare or unusual event,
the client must be prepared to recover. The server is responsible
for determining the precise consequences of the lease expiration,
informing the client of the scope of the lock revocation decided
upon. The client then uses the status information provided
by the server in the SEQUENCE results (field sr_status_flags,
see <xref target="OP_SEQUENCE_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>)
to synchronize its locking state with that of the
server, in order to recover.
</t>
<t>
The third occasion of lock revocation can occur as a result of
revocation of locks within the lease period, either because of
administrative intervention or because a recallable lock (a
delegation or layout) was not returned within the lease period
after having been recalled. While these are
considered rare events, they are possible, and the client must be
prepared to deal with them. When either of these events occurs,
the client finds out about the situation through the status returned
by the SEQUENCE operation. Any use of stateids associated with
locks revoked during the lease period will receive the error
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED or NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED, as appropriate.
</t>
<t>
In all situations in which a subset of locking state may have been
revoked, which include all cases in which locking state is revoked
within the lease period, it is up to the client to determine which
locks have been revoked and which have not. It does this by
using the TEST_STATEID operation on the appropriate set of stateids.
Once the set of revoked locks has been determined, the applications
can be notified, and the invalidated stateids can be freed and
lock revocation acknowledged by using FREE_STATEID.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Server Revocation of Locks" -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Short and Long Leases</name>
<t>
When determining the time period for the server lease, the usual lease
trade-offs apply. A short lease is good for fast server recovery at a
cost of increased operations to effect lease renewal (when there are
no other operations during the period to effect lease renewal as a
side effect). A long lease is certainly kinder and gentler to
servers trying to handle very large numbers of clients. The number of extra requests
to effect lock renewal drops in inverse
proportion to the lease time. The disadvantages of a long lease
include the possibility of slower recovery after certain failures.
After server failure, a longer grace period may be required when
some clients do not promptly reclaim their locks and do a
global RECLAIM_COMPLETE. In the event of client failure,
the longer period for a lease to expire will force conflicting
requests to wait longer.
</t>
<t>
A long lease is practical if the server can store lease state in
stable storage. Upon recovery, the server can reconstruct the
lease state from its stable storage and continue operation with
its clients.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Short and Long Leases" -->
<section anchor="lease_propagation_delay" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Clocks, Propagation Delay, and Calculating Lease Expiration</name>
<t>
To avoid the need for synchronized clocks, lease times are granted by
the server as a time delta. However, there is a requirement that the
client and server clocks do not drift excessively over the duration of
the lease. There is also the issue of propagation delay across the
network, which could easily be several hundred milliseconds, as well as
the possibility that requests will be lost and need to be
retransmitted.
</t>
<t>
To take propagation delay into account, the client should
subtract it from lease times (e.g., if the client estimates the
one-way propagation delay as 200 milliseconds, then it can
assume that the lease is already 200 milliseconds old when it
gets it). In addition, it will take another 200 milliseconds to
get a response back to the server. So the client must send a
lease renewal or write data back to the server at least 400
milliseconds before the lease would expire. If the propagation delay
varies over the life of the lease (e.g., the client is on a mobile
host), the client will need to continuously subtract the increase
in propagation delay from the lease times.
</t>
<t>
The server's lease period configuration should take into account the
network distance of the clients that will be accessing the server's
resources. It is expected that the lease period will take into
account the network propagation delays and other network delay factors
for the client population. Since the protocol does not allow for an
automatic method to determine an appropriate lease period, the
server's administrator may have to tune the lease period.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Clocks, Propagation Delay, and Calculating Lease Expiration" -->
<section anchor="vestigial_locking" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Obsolete Locking Infrastructure from NFSv4.0</name>
<t>
There are a number of operations and fields within existing
operations that no longer have a function in NFSv4.1.
In one way or another, these changes are all due to
the implementation of sessions that provide client context
and exactly once semantics as a base feature of the protocol,
separate from locking itself.
</t>
<t>
The following NFSv4.0 operations <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be implemented in NFSv4.1.
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP if these operations are
found in an NFSv4.1 COMPOUND.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
SETCLIENTID since its function has been replaced by
EXCHANGE_ID.
</li>
<li>
SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM since client ID confirmation now
happens by means of CREATE_SESSION.
</li>
<li>
OPEN_CONFIRM because state-owner-based seqids
have been replaced by the sequence ID in the
SEQUENCE operation.
</li>
<li>
RELEASE_LOCKOWNER because lock-owners with no associated
locks do not have any sequence-related state and so can
be deleted by the server at will.
</li>
<li>
RENEW because every SEQUENCE operation for a session causes
lease renewal, making a separate operation superfluous.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Also, there are a number of fields, present in existing operations,
related to locking that have no use in minor version 1. They
were used in minor version 0 to perform functions now provided
in a different
fashion.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Sequence ids used to sequence requests for a given state-owner
and to provide retry protection, now provided
via sessions.
</li>
<li>
Client IDs used to identify the client associated with a given
request. Client identification is now available using the client ID
associated with the current session, without needing an explicit
client ID field.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Such vestigial fields in existing operations have no function in
NFSv4.1 and are ignored by the server. Note that client IDs in
operations new to NFSv4.1 (such as CREATE_SESSION and DESTROY_CLIENTID)
are not ignored.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Vestigial Locking Infrastructure From V4.0" -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] "State Management" -->
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="file_locking" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File Locking and Share Reservations</name>
<t>
To support Win32 share reservations, it is necessary to provide
operations that atomically open or create files. Having a
separate share/unshare operation would not allow correct
implementation of the Win32 OpenFile API. In order to
correctly implement share semantics, the previous NFS protocol
mechanisms used when a file is opened or created (LOOKUP, CREATE,
ACCESS) need to be replaced. The NFSv4.1 protocol defines
an OPEN operation that is capable of atomically looking up, creating,
and locking a file on the server.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Opens and Byte-Range Locks</name>
<t>
It is assumed that manipulating a byte-range lock is rare when
compared to READ
and WRITE operations. It is also assumed that server restarts and network
partitions are relatively rare. Therefore, it is important that the
READ and WRITE operations have a lightweight mechanism to indicate if
they possess a held lock. A LOCK operation contains the
heavyweight information required to establish a byte-range lock and uniquely
define the owner of the lock.
</t>
<section anchor="state-owner" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>State-Owner Definition</name>
<t>
When opening a file or requesting a byte-range lock, the
client must specify an identifier that represents the owner of
the requested lock. This identifier is in the form of a
state-owner, represented in the protocol by a state_owner4, a
variable-length opaque array that, when concatenated with the
current client ID, uniquely defines the owner of a lock managed
by the client. This may be a thread ID, process ID, or other
unique value.
</t>
<t>
Owners of opens and owners of byte-range locks are separate
entities and remain separate even if the same opaque arrays
are used to designate owners of each. The protocol distinguishes
between open-owners (represented by open_owner4 structures)
and lock-owners (represented by lock_owner4 structures).
</t>
<t>
Each open is associated with a specific open-owner while each
byte-range lock is associated with a lock-owner and an
open-owner, the latter being the open-owner associated with the
open file under which the LOCK operation was done. Delegations
and layouts, on the other hand, are not associated with a
specific owner but are associated with the client as a whole
(identified by a client ID).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "State-owner Definition" -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Use of the Stateid and Locking</name>
<t>
All READ, WRITE, and SETATTR operations contain a stateid. For the
purposes of this section, SETATTR operations that change the size
attribute of a file are treated as if they are writing the area
between the old and new sizes (i.e., the byte-range truncated or added to the
file by means of the SETATTR), even where SETATTR is not explicitly
mentioned in the text. The stateid passed to one of these operations must
be one that represents an open, a set of byte-range locks, or a
delegation, or it may be a special stateid representing anonymous
access or the special bypass stateid.
</t>
<t>
If the state-owner performs a READ or WRITE operation in a situation in which
it has established a byte-range lock or share reservation
on the server (any OPEN constitutes a share reservation), the
stateid (previously returned by the server) must be used to
indicate what locks, including both byte-range
locks and share reservations, are held by the state-owner. If no state
is established by the client, either a byte-range lock or a share reservation,
a special stateid for anonymous state (zero as the value for "other" and "seqid")
is used. (See <xref target="special_stateid" format="default"/> for a description of
'special' stateids in general.)
Regardless of whether a stateid for anonymous state
or a stateid returned by the server is used, if there is a
conflicting share reservation or mandatory byte-range lock held on the
file, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> refuse to service the READ or WRITE operation.
</t>
<t>
Share reservations are established by OPEN operations and by their
nature are mandatory in that when the OPEN denies READ or WRITE
operations, that denial results in such operations being rejected with
error NFS4ERR_LOCKED. Byte-range locks may be implemented by the server
as either mandatory or advisory, or the choice of mandatory or
advisory behavior may be determined by the server on the basis of the
file being accessed (for example, some UNIX-based servers support a
"mandatory lock bit" on the mode attribute such that if set, byte-range
locks are required on the file before I/O is possible). When byte-range
locks are advisory, they only prevent the granting of conflicting lock
requests and have no effect on READs or WRITEs. Mandatory byte-range
locks, however, prevent conflicting I/O operations. When they are
attempted, they are rejected with NFS4ERR_LOCKED. When the client
gets NFS4ERR_LOCKED on a file for which it knows it has the proper share
reservation, it will need to send a LOCK operation on the byte-range of
the file that includes the byte-range the I/O was to be performed on, with
an appropriate locktype field of the LOCK operation's arguments (i.e., READ*_LT for a READ operation, WRITE*_LT
for a WRITE operation).
</t>
<t>
Note that for UNIX environments that support mandatory byte-range locking,
the distinction between advisory and mandatory locking is subtle. In
fact, advisory and mandatory byte-range locks are exactly the same as
far as the APIs and requirements on implementation. If the mandatory
lock attribute is set on the file, the server checks to see if the
lock-owner has an appropriate shared (READ_LT) or exclusive (WRITE_LT) byte-range
lock on the byte-range it wishes to READ from or WRITE to. If there is no
appropriate lock, the server checks if there is a conflicting lock
(which can be done by attempting to acquire the conflicting lock on
behalf of the lock-owner, and if successful, release the lock after
the READ or WRITE operation is done), and if there is, the server returns
NFS4ERR_LOCKED.
</t>
<t>
For Windows environments, byte-range locks are always mandatory, so the
server always checks for byte-range locks during I/O requests.
</t>
<t>
Thus, the LOCK operation does not need to distinguish
between advisory and mandatory byte-range locks. It is the
server's processing of the READ and WRITE operations that introduces
the distinction.
</t>
<t>
Every stateid that is validly passed to READ, WRITE, or SETATTR,
with the exception of special stateid values,
defines an access mode for the file (i.e.,
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ, OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, or
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH).
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
For stateids associated with opens, this is the mode defined by
the original OPEN that caused the
allocation of the OPEN stateid
and as modified by subsequent OPENs and OPEN_DOWNGRADEs for the
same open-owner/file pair.
</li>
<li>
For stateids returned by byte-range LOCK operations,
the appropriate mode is the access mode for the OPEN
stateid associated with the lock set represented by the stateid.
</li>
<li>
For delegation stateids, the access mode is based on the type of delegation.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When a READ, WRITE, or SETATTR (that specifies the
size attribute) operation is done, the operation is subject to checking against
the access mode to verify that the operation is appropriate given the
stateid with which the operation is associated.
</t>
<t>
In the case of WRITE-type operations (i.e., WRITEs and SETATTRs that
set size), the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> verify that the access mode allows writing
and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return an NFS4ERR_OPENMODE error if it does not. In the case of
READ, the server may perform the corresponding check on the access
mode, or it may choose to allow READ on OPENs for OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, to
accommodate clients whose WRITE implementation may unavoidably do
reads (e.g., due to buffer cache constraints). However, even if READs
are allowed in these circumstances, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> still check for
locks that conflict with the READ (e.g., another OPEN specified OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ or OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH). Note that a server that does enforce the access mode check
on READs need not explicitly check for conflicting share reservations
since the existence of OPEN for OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ guarantees that no
conflicting share reservation can exist.
</t>
<t>
The READ bypass special stateid (all bits of "other" and "seqid" set
to one)
indicates a desire to bypass locking checks. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
allow READ operations to bypass
locking checks at the server, when this special stateid is used.
However, WRITE operations with
this special stateid value <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> bypass locking checks and are
treated exactly the same as if a special stateid for anonymous state
were used.
</t>
<t>
A lock may not be granted while a READ or WRITE operation using one of
the special stateids is being performed and the scope of the lock
to be granted would conflict with the READ or WRITE operation.
This can occur when:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
A mandatory byte-range lock is requested with a byte-range that
conflicts with the byte-range of the READ or WRITE operation.
For the purposes of this paragraph, a conflict occurs when
a shared lock is requested and a WRITE operation is being
performed, or an exclusive lock is requested and either a
READ or a WRITE operation is being performed.
</li>
<li>
A share reservation is requested that denies reading and/or
writing and the corresponding operation is being performed.
</li>
<li>
A delegation is to be granted and the delegation type would
prevent the I/O operation, i.e., READ and WRITE conflict with
an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation and WRITE conflicts with an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When a client holds a delegation, it needs to ensure
that the stateid sent conveys the association of
operation with the delegation, to avoid the delegation from
being avoidably recalled. When the delegation stateid,
a stateid open associated with that delegation, or a stateid
representing byte-range locks derived from such an open is
used, the server knows that the READ, WRITE, or SETATTR
does not conflict with the delegation but is sent under
the aegis of the delegation. Even though it is possible
for the server to determine from the client ID (via
the session ID) that the client does in fact have a
delegation, the server is not obliged to check this, so
using a special stateid can result in avoidable recall
of the delegation.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Use of the Stateid and Locking" -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Opens and Byte-Range Locks" -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Lock Ranges</name>
<t>
The protocol allows a lock-owner to request a lock with a byte-range
and then either upgrade, downgrade, or unlock a sub-range of
the initial lock, or a byte-range that
overlaps -- fully or partially -- either with that initial lock or a
combination of a set of existing locks for the same lock-owner. It
is expected that this will be an uncommon type of request. In any
case, servers or server file systems may not be able to support
sub-range lock semantics. In the event that a server receives a
locking request that represents a sub-range of current locking state
for the lock-owner, the server is allowed to return the error
NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE to signify that it does not support sub-range lock
operations. Therefore, the client should be prepared to receive this
error and, if appropriate, report the error to the requesting
application.
</t>
<t>
The client is discouraged from combining multiple independent locking
ranges that happen to be adjacent into a single request since the
server may not support sub-range requests for reasons related to
the recovery of byte-range locking state in the event of server failure. As
discussed in <xref target="server_failure" format="default"/>, the
server may employ certain optimizations during recovery that work
effectively only when the client's behavior during lock recovery is
similar to the client's locking behavior prior to server failure.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Lock Ranges" -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Upgrading and Downgrading Locks</name>
<t>
If a client has a WRITE_LT lock on a byte-range, it can request an atomic
downgrade of the lock to a READ_LT lock via the LOCK operation, by setting
the type to READ_LT. If the server supports atomic downgrade, the
request will succeed. If not, it will return NFS4ERR_LOCK_NOTSUPP. The
client should be prepared to receive this error and, if appropriate,
report the error to the requesting application.
</t>
<t>
If a client has a READ_LT lock on a byte-range, it can request an atomic
upgrade of the lock to a WRITE_LT lock via the LOCK operation by setting
the type to WRITE_LT or WRITEW_LT. If the server does not support
atomic upgrade, it will return NFS4ERR_LOCK_NOTSUPP. If the upgrade
can be achieved without an existing conflict, the request will
succeed. Otherwise, the server will return either NFS4ERR_DENIED or
NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK. The error NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK is returned if the client
sent the LOCK operation with the type set to WRITEW_LT and the server
has detected a deadlock. The client should be prepared to receive such
errors and, if appropriate, report the error to the requesting
application.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Upgrading and Downgrading Locks" -->
<section anchor="byte_range_seqid" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stateid Seqid Values and Byte-Range Locks</name>
<t>
When a LOCK or LOCKU operation is performed,
the stateid returned has the same "other" value as the argument's
stateid, and a
"seqid" value that is incremented (relative to the argument's
stateid) to reflect the occurrence
of the LOCK or LOCKU operation. The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> increment
the value of the "seqid" field whenever there is any change
to the locking status of any byte offset as described by
any of the locks covered by the stateid. A change in locking
status includes a change from locked to unlocked or the reverse or
a change from being locked for READ_LT to being locked for WRITE_LT
or the reverse.
</t>
<t>
When there is no such change, as, for example, when a range
already locked for WRITE_LT is locked again for WRITE_LT, the
server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> increment the "seqid" value.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Stateid Sequence Values and Byte-Range Locks" -->
<section anchor="multiple_openowners" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Issues with Multiple Open-Owners</name>
<t>
When the same file is opened by multiple open-owners,
a client will have multiple OPEN stateids for that
file, each associated with a different open-owner.
In that case, there can be multiple LOCK and LOCKU
requests for the same lock-owner sent using the
different OPEN stateids, and so a situation may
arise in which there are multiple stateids, each
representing byte-range locks on the same file and
held by the same lock-owner but each associated with
a different open-owner.
</t>
<t>
In such a situation, the locking status of each byte
(i.e., whether it is locked, the READ_LT or WRITE_LT type of
the lock, and the lock-owner holding the lock) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
reflect the last LOCK or LOCKU operation done for the
lock-owner in question, independent of the stateid through
which the request was sent.
</t>
<t>
When a byte is locked by the lock-owner in question, the
open-owner to which that byte-range lock is assigned <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be that
of the open-owner associated with the stateid through
which the last LOCK of that byte was done. When there
is a change in the open-owner associated with locks for
the stateid through which a LOCK or LOCKU was done, the
"seqid" field of the stateid <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be incremented, even
if the locking, in terms of lock-owners has not changed.
When there is a change to the set of locked bytes associated
with a different stateid for the same lock-owner, i.e.,
associated with a different open-owner, the "seqid" value
for that stateid <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be incremented.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Issues with Multiple Open-Owners" -->
<section anchor="blocking_locks" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Blocking Locks</name>
<t>
Some clients require the support of blocking locks. While NFSv4.1
provides a callback when a previously unavailable lock becomes
available, this is an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> feature and clients cannot
depend on its presence. Clients need to be prepared to continually
poll for the lock. This presents a fairness problem. Two of
the lock types, READW_LT and WRITEW_LT, are used to indicate to the
server that the client is requesting a blocking lock. When the
callback is not used, the server should maintain an ordered
list of pending blocking locks. When the conflicting lock is
released, the server may wait for the period of time equal to
lease_time for the first waiting
client to re-request the lock. After the lease period expires, the
next waiting client request is allowed the lock. Clients are required
to poll at an interval sufficiently small that it is likely to acquire
the lock in a timely manner. The server is not required to maintain a
list of pending blocked locks as it is used to increase fairness and
not correct operation. Because of the unordered nature of crash
recovery, storing of lock state to stable storage would be required to
guarantee ordered granting of blocking locks.
</t>
<t>
Servers may also note the lock types and delay returning denial of the
request to allow extra time for a conflicting lock to be released,
allowing a successful return. In this way, clients can avoid the
burden of needless frequent polling for blocking locks. The server
should take care in the length of delay in the event the client
retransmits the request.
</t>
<t>
If a server receives a blocking LOCK operation, denies it, and then
later receives a nonblocking request for the same lock, which is
also denied, then it should remove the lock in question from its list of
pending blocking locks. Clients should use such a nonblocking request
to indicate to the server that this is the last time they intend to poll
for the lock, as may happen when the process requesting the lock is
interrupted. This is a courtesy to the server, to prevent it from
unnecessarily waiting a lease period before granting other LOCK operations.
However, clients are not required to perform this courtesy, and servers
must not depend on them doing so. Also, clients must be prepared for
the possibility that this final locking request will be accepted.
</t>
<t>
When a server indicates, via the flag OPEN4_RESULT_MAY_NOTIFY_LOCK, that
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK callbacks might be done for the current open file, the
client should take notice of this, but, since this is a hint, cannot
rely on a CB_NOTIFY_LOCK always being done. A client may reasonably
reduce the frequency with which it polls for a denied lock, since the
greater latency that might occur is likely to be eliminated given a
prompt callback, but it still needs to poll. When it receives a
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK, it should promptly try to obtain the lock, but it
should be aware that other clients may be polling and that the server is under
no obligation to reserve the lock for that particular client.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] title="Blocking Locks" -->
<section anchor="share_reserve" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Share Reservations</name>
<t>
A share reservation is a mechanism to control access to a file. It is
a separate and independent mechanism from byte-range locking. When a
client opens a file, it sends an OPEN operation to the server
specifying the type of access required (READ, WRITE, or BOTH) and the
type of access to deny others (OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE,
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ, OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE, or OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH). If
the OPEN fails, the client will fail the application's open request.
</t>
<t>
Pseudo-code definition of the semantics:
</t>
<sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[
if (request.access == 0) {
return (NFS4ERR_INVAL)
} else {
if ((request.access & file_state.deny)) ||
(request.deny & file_state.access)) {
return (NFS4ERR_SHARE_DENIED)
}
return (NFS4ERR_OK);]]></sourcecode>
<t>
When doing this checking of share reservations on OPEN, the current
file_state used in the algorithm includes bits that reflect all
current opens, including those for the open-owner making the
new OPEN request.
</t>
<t>
The constants used for the OPEN and OPEN_DOWNGRADE operations for the
access and deny fields are as follows:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ = 0x00000001;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE = 0x00000002;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH = 0x00000003;
const OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE = 0x00000000;
const OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ = 0x00000001;
const OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE = 0x00000002;
const OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH = 0x00000003;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Share Reservations" -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>OPEN/CLOSE Operations</name>
<t>
To provide correct share semantics, a client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the OPEN
operation to obtain the initial filehandle and indicate the desired
access and what access, if any, to deny. Even if the client intends to
use a special stateid for anonymous state or READ bypass,
it must still obtain the
filehandle for the regular file with the OPEN operation so the
appropriate share semantics can be applied. Clients that do not
have a deny mode built into their programming interfaces for opening
a file should request a deny mode of
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE.
</t>
<t>
The OPEN operation with the CREATE flag also subsumes the CREATE
operation for regular files as used in previous versions of the NFS
protocol. This allows a create with a share to be done atomically.
</t>
<t>
The CLOSE operation removes all share reservations held by the
open-owner on that file. If byte-range locks are held, the client
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> release all locks before sending a CLOSE operation. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> free
all outstanding locks on CLOSE, but some servers may not support the
CLOSE of a file that still has byte-range locks held. The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
return failure, NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD, if any locks would exist after the
CLOSE.
</t>
<t>
The LOOKUP operation will return a filehandle without establishing any
lock state on the server. Without a valid stateid, the server will
assume that the client has the least access. For example, if one
client opened a file with OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH and another client
accesses the file via a filehandle obtained through LOOKUP, the
second client could only read the file using the special read
bypass stateid. The second client could not WRITE the file
at all because it would
not have a valid stateid from OPEN and the special anonymous stateid would
not be allowed access.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "OPEN/CLOSE Operations" -->
<section anchor="open_upgrade" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Open Upgrade and Downgrade</name>
<t>
When an OPEN is done for a file and the open-owner for which the OPEN
is being done already has the file open, the result is to upgrade the
open file status maintained on the server to include the access and
deny bits specified by the new OPEN as well as those for the existing
OPEN. The result is that there is one open file, as far as the
protocol is concerned, and it includes the union of the access and
deny bits for all of the OPEN requests completed. The OPEN
is represented by a single stateid whose "other" value matches
that of the original open, and whose "seqid" value is incremented
to reflect the occurrence of the upgrade. The increment is required
in cases in which the "upgrade" results in no change to the open mode (e.g., an OPEN
is done for read when the existing open file is opened for
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH). Only a single CLOSE will be done to reset the
effects of both OPENs. The client may use the stateid returned
by the OPEN effecting the upgrade or with a stateid sharing the
same "other" field and a seqid of zero,
although care needs to be taken as far as upgrades that happen
while the CLOSE is pending. Note that the
client, when sending the OPEN, may not know that the same file is in
fact being opened. The above only applies if both OPENs result in
the OPENed object being designated by the same filehandle.
</t>
<t>
When the server chooses to export multiple filehandles corresponding
to the same file object and returns different filehandles on two
different OPENs of the same file object, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> "OR"
together the access and deny bits and coalesce the two open files.
Instead, the server must maintain separate OPENs with separate
stateids and will require separate CLOSEs to free them.
</t>
<t>
When multiple open files on the client are merged into a single OPEN
file object on the server, the close of one of the open files (on the
client) may necessitate change of the access and deny status of the
open file on the server. This is because the union of the access and
deny bits for the remaining opens may be smaller (i.e., a proper
subset) than previously. The OPEN_DOWNGRADE operation is used to make
the necessary change and the client should use it to update the server
so that share reservation requests by other clients are handled
properly. The stateid returned has the same "other" field as
that passed to the server. The "seqid" value in the returned
stateid <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be incremented, even in situations in which there is
no change to the access and deny bits for the file.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Open Upgrade and Downgrade" -->
<section anchor="parallel_opens" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Parallel OPENs</name>
<t>
Unlike the case of NFSv4.0, in which OPEN operations for the same
open-owner are inherently serialized because of the owner-based seqid,
multiple OPENs for the same open-owner may be done in parallel. When
clients do this, they may encounter situations in which, because
of the existence of hard links, two OPEN operations may turn out
to open the same file, with a later OPEN performed being an upgrade of
the first, with this fact only visible to the
client once the operations complete.
</t>
<t>
In this situation, clients may determine the order in which the
OPENs were performed by examining the stateids returned by the OPENs.
Stateids that share a common value of the "other" field can be
recognized as having opened the same file, with the order of the
operations determinable from the order of the "seqid" fields, mod
any possible wraparound of the 32-bit field.
</t>
<t>
When the possibility exists that the client will send multiple
OPENs for the same open-owner in parallel, it may be the case that
an open upgrade may happen without the client knowing beforehand
that this could happen. Because of this possibility, CLOSEs and
OPEN_DOWNGRADEs should generally be sent with a non-zero seqid
in the stateid, to avoid the possibility that the status change
associated with an open upgrade is not inadvertently lost.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Parallel OPENs" -->
<section anchor="open_br_reclaim" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Reclaim of Open and Byte-Range Locks</name>
<t>
Special forms of the LOCK and OPEN operations are provided when it
is necessary to re-establish byte-range locks or opens after a
server failure.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
To reclaim existing opens, an OPEN operation is performed
using a CLAIM_PREVIOUS. Because the client, in this type
of situation, will have already opened the file and have
the filehandle of the target file, this operation requires
that the current filehandle be the target file, rather than
a directory, and no file name is specified.
</li>
<li>
To reclaim byte-range locks, a LOCK operation with the
reclaim parameter set to true is used.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Reclaims of opens associated with delegations are discussed in
<xref target="delegation_recovery" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] "File Locking and Share Reservations" -->
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client-Side Caching</name>
<t>
Client-side caching of data, of file attributes, and of file names is
essential to providing good performance with the NFS protocol.
Providing distributed cache coherence is a difficult problem, and
previous versions of the NFS protocol have not attempted it. Instead,
several NFS client implementation techniques have been used to reduce
the problems that a lack of coherence poses for users. These
techniques have not been clearly defined by earlier protocol
specifications, and it is often unclear what is valid or invalid client
behavior.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol uses many techniques similar to those that
have been used in previous protocol versions. The NFSv4.1
protocol does not provide distributed cache coherence. However, it
defines a more limited set of caching guarantees to allow locks and
share reservations to be used without destructive interference from
client-side caching.
</t>
<t>
In addition, the NFSv4.1 protocol introduces a delegation
mechanism, which allows many decisions normally made by the server to
be made locally by clients. This mechanism provides efficient support
of the common cases where sharing is infrequent or where sharing is
read-only.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Performance Challenges for Client-Side Caching</name>
<t>
Caching techniques used in previous versions of the NFS protocol have
been successful in providing good performance. However, several
scalability challenges can arise when those techniques are used with
very large numbers of clients. This is particularly true when clients
are geographically distributed, which classically increases the latency
for cache revalidation requests.
</t>
<t>
The previous versions of the NFS protocol repeat their file data cache
validation requests at the time the file is opened. This behavior can
have serious performance drawbacks. A common case is one in which a
file is only accessed by a single client. Therefore, sharing is
infrequent.
</t>
<t>
In this case, repeated references to the server to find that no
conflicts exist are expensive. A better option with regards to
performance is to allow a client that repeatedly opens a file to do so
without reference to the server. This is done until potentially
conflicting operations from another client actually occur.
</t>
<t>
A similar situation arises in connection with byte-range locking. Sending
LOCK and LOCKU operations as well as the READ and
WRITE operations necessary to make data caching consistent with the
locking semantics (see <xref target="dc_file_locking" format="default"/>)
can severely limit performance. When locking is used to provide
protection against infrequent conflicts, a large penalty is incurred.
This penalty may discourage the use of byte-range locking by applications.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol provides more aggressive caching strategies
with the following design goals:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Compatibility with a large range of server semantics.
</li>
<li>
Providing the same caching benefits as previous versions of
the NFS protocol when unable to support the more aggressive model.
</li>
<li>
Requirements for aggressive caching are organized so that a
large portion of the benefit can be obtained even when not
all of the requirements can be met.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The appropriate requirements for the server are discussed in later
sections in which specific forms of caching are covered (see
<xref target="open_delegation" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="deleg_and_cb" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Delegation and Callbacks</name>
<t>
Recallable delegation of server responsibilities for a file to a
client improves performance by avoiding repeated requests to the
server in the absence of inter-client conflict. With the use of a
"callback" RPC from server to client, a server recalls delegated
responsibilities when another client engages in sharing of a delegated
file.
</t>
<t>
A delegation is passed from the server to the client, specifying the
object of the delegation and the type of delegation. There are
different types of delegations, but each type contains a stateid to be
used to represent the delegation when performing operations that
depend on the delegation. This stateid is similar to those associated
with locks and share reservations but differs in that the stateid for
a delegation is associated with a client ID and may be used on behalf
of all the open-owners for the given client. A delegation is made
to the client as a whole and not to any specific process or thread of
control within it.
</t>
<t>
The backchannel is established by CREATE_SESSION and
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, and the client is required
to maintain it. Because the backchannel may be down, even
temporarily,
correct protocol operation does not depend on
them. Preliminary testing of backchannel functionality by means of a
CB_COMPOUND procedure with a single operation, CB_SEQUENCE,
can be used to check the continuity of the backchannel. A
server avoids delegating responsibilities until it has
determined that the backchannel exists. Because the granting of a
delegation is always conditional upon the absence of conflicting
access, clients <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> assume that a delegation will be granted and
they <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> always be prepared for OPENs, WANT_DELEGATIONs, and
GET_DIR_DELEGATIONs to be processed without any
delegations being granted.
</t>
<t>
Unlike locks, an operation by a second client to a delegated file will
cause the server to recall a delegation through a callback. For
individual operations, we will describe, under IMPLEMENTATION, when
such operations are required to effect a recall. A number of
points should be noted, however.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The server is free to recall a delegation
whenever it feels it is desirable and may do so even if no
operations requiring recall are being done.
</li>
<li>
Operations done outside the NFSv4.1 protocol, due to, for
example, access by other protocols, or by local access,
also need to result in delegation recall when they make
analogous changes to file system data. What is crucial
is if the change would invalidate the guarantees provided
by the delegation. When this is possible, the
delegation needs to be recalled and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned or
revoked before allowing the operation to proceed.
</li>
<li>
The semantics of the file system are crucial in defining
when delegation recall is required. If a particular change
within a specific implementation causes change to a
file attribute, then delegation recall is required, whether
that operation has been specifically listed as requiring
delegation recall. Again, what is critical is whether the
guarantees provided by the delegation are being invalidated.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Despite those caveats, the implementation sections for a number
of operations describe situations in which delegation recall
would be required under some common circumstances:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
For GETATTR, see <xref target="OP_GETATTR_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For OPEN, see <xref target="OP_OPEN_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For READ, see <xref target="OP_READ_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For REMOVE, see <xref target="OP_REMOVE_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For RENAME, see <xref target="OP_RENAME_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For SETATTR, see <xref target="OP_SETATTR_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For WRITE, see <xref target="OP_WRITE_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
On recall, the client holding the delegation needs to flush modified
state (such as modified data) to the server and return the
delegation. The conflicting request will not be acted on until
the recall is complete. The recall is considered complete when
the client returns the delegation or the server times its wait
for the delegation to be returned and revokes the delegation as
a result of the timeout. In the interim, the server will either
delay responding to conflicting requests or respond to them with
NFS4ERR_DELAY. Following the resolution of the recall, the
server has the information necessary to grant or deny the second
client's request.
</t>
<t>
At the time the client receives a delegation recall, it may have
substantial state that needs to be flushed to the server. Therefore,
the server should allow sufficient time for the delegation to be
returned since it may involve numerous RPCs to the server. If the
server is able to determine that the client is diligently flushing
state to the server as a result of the recall, the server may extend
the usual time allowed for a recall. However, the time allowed for
recall completion should not be unbounded.
</t>
<t>
An example of this is when responsibility to mediate opens on a given
file is delegated to a client (see <xref target="open_delegation" format="default"/>).
The server will not know what opens are in effect on the client.
Without this knowledge, the server will be unable to determine if the
access and deny states for the file allow any particular open until
the delegation for the file has been returned.
</t>
<t>
A client failure or a network partition can result in failure to
respond to a recall callback. In this case, the server will revoke the
delegation, which in turn will render useless any modified state still
on the client.
</t>
<section anchor="delegation_recovery" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Delegation Recovery</name>
<t>
There are three situations that delegation recovery needs to deal with:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
client restart
</li>
<li>
server restart
</li>
<li>
network partition (full or backchannel-only)
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In the event the client restarts, the failure to renew
the lease will result in the revocation of byte-range locks and share
reservations. Delegations, however, may be treated a bit differently.
</t>
<t>
There will be situations in which delegations will need to be
re-established after a client restarts. The reason for this
is that the client may have file data stored locally and this data was
associated with the previously held delegations. The client will need
to re-establish the appropriate file state on the server.
</t>
<t>
To allow for this type of client recovery, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> extend the
period for delegation recovery beyond the typical lease expiration
period. This implies that requests from other clients that conflict
with these delegations will need to wait. Because the normal recall
process may require significant time for the client to flush changed
state to the server, other clients need be prepared for delays that
occur because of a conflicting delegation. This longer interval would
increase the window for clients to restart and consult stable storage
so that the delegations can be reclaimed. For OPEN delegations, such
delegations are reclaimed using OPEN with a claim type of
CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV or CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH (see Sections
<xref target="data_caching_revocation" format="counter"/>
and <xref target="OP_OPEN" format="counter"/> for discussion of OPEN delegation
and the details of OPEN, respectively).
</t>
<t>
A server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support claim types of CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV and
CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH, and if it
does, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> remove delegations upon a CREATE_SESSION that
confirm a client ID created by EXCHANGE_ID.
Instead, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, for a period of time no less than that of the value of
the lease_time attribute, maintain the client's delegations to allow
time for the client to send CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV and/or CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH requests. The server
that supports CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV and/or CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the DELEGPURGE
operation.
</t>
<t>
When the server restarts, delegations are reclaimed (using
the OPEN operation with CLAIM_PREVIOUS) in a similar fashion to byte-range
locks and share reservations. However, there is a slight semantic
difference. In the normal case, if the server decides that a
delegation should not be granted, it performs the requested action
(e.g., OPEN) without granting any delegation. For reclaim, the server
grants the delegation but a special designation is applied so that the
client treats the delegation as having been granted but recalled by
the server. Because of this, the client has the duty to write all
modified state to the server and then return the delegation. This
process of handling delegation reclaim reconciles three principles of
the NFSv4.1 protocol:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Upon reclaim, a client reporting resources assigned to it by an
earlier server instance must be granted those resources.
</li>
<li>
The server has unquestionable authority to determine whether
delegations are to be granted and, once granted, whether they are to
be continued.
</li>
<li>
The use of callbacks should not be depended upon until the client has
proven its ability to receive them.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When a client needs to reclaim a delegation and there is no associated
open, the client may use the CLAIM_PREVIOUS variant of the
WANT_DELEGATION operation. However, since the server is not required
to support this operation, an alternative is to reclaim via a dummy OPEN
together with the delegation
using an OPEN of type CLAIM_PREVIOUS. The dummy open file can
be released using a CLOSE to re-establish the original state to be
reclaimed, a delegation without an associated open.
</t>
<t>
When a client has more than a single open associated with a delegation,
state for those additional opens can be established using OPEN
operations of type CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR. When these are used to
establish opens associated with reclaimed delegations, the
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> allow them when made within the grace period.
</t>
<t>
When a network partition occurs, delegations are subject to freeing by
the server when the lease renewal period expires. This is similar to
the behavior for locks and share reservations. For delegations,
however, the server may extend the period in which conflicting
requests are held off. Eventually, the occurrence of a conflicting
request from another client will cause revocation of the delegation.
A loss of the backchannel (e.g., by later network configuration
change) will have the same effect. A recall request will fail and
revocation of the delegation will result.
</t>
<t>
A client normally finds out about revocation of a delegation when it
uses a stateid associated with a delegation and receives one of the
errors NFS4ERR_EXPIRED, NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED, or NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED.
It also may find out about delegation revocation
after a client restart when it attempts to reclaim a delegation and
receives that same error. Note that in the case of a revoked OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, there are issues because data may have been modified
by the client whose delegation is revoked and separately by other
clients. See <xref target="revocation_recovery_write" format="default"/>
for a discussion of such issues. Note also that when
delegations are revoked, information about the revoked delegation will
be written by the server to stable storage (as described in
<xref target="network_partitions_and_recovery" format="default"/>). This is done
to deal with the case in
which a server restarts after revoking a delegation but before the
client holding the revoked delegation is notified about the
revocation.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Caching</name>
<t>
When applications share access to a set of files, they need to be
implemented so as to take account of the possibility of conflicting
access by another application. This is true whether the applications
in question execute on different clients or reside on the same client.
</t>
<t>
Share reservations and byte-range locks are the facilities the NFSv4.1 protocol
provides to allow applications to coordinate access by
using mutual exclusion facilities. The NFSv4.1 protocol's
data caching must be implemented such that it does not invalidate the
assumptions on which those using these facilities depend.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Caching and OPENs</name>
<t>
In order to avoid invalidating the sharing assumptions on which
applications rely, NFSv4.1 clients should not provide cached
data to applications or modify it on behalf of an application when it
would not be valid to obtain or modify that same data via a READ or
WRITE operation.
</t>
<t>
Furthermore, in the absence of an OPEN delegation
(see <xref target="open_delegation" format="default"/>),
two additional rules apply. Note that these rules are
obeyed in practice by many NFSv3 clients.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
First, cached data present on a client must be revalidated after doing
an OPEN. Revalidating means that the client fetches the change
attribute from the server, compares it with the cached change
attribute, and if different, declares the cached data (as well as the
cached attributes) as invalid. This is to ensure that the data for
the OPENed file is still correctly reflected in the client's cache.
This validation must be done at least when the client's OPEN operation
includes a deny of OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE or
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH, thus terminating a period in which
other
clients may have had the opportunity to open the file with
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE/OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH
access. Clients may choose to do the revalidation more often (i.e., at
OPENs specifying a deny mode of OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE) to parallel the NFSv3 protocol's
practice for the benefit of users assuming this degree of cache
revalidation.
</t>
<t>
Since the change attribute is updated for data and metadata
modifications, some client implementors may be tempted to use the
time_modify attribute and not the change attribute to validate cached data, so that
metadata changes do not spuriously invalidate clean data. The
implementor is cautioned in this approach. The change attribute is
guaranteed to change for each update to the file, whereas time_modify
is guaranteed to change only at the granularity of the time_delta
attribute. Use by the client's data cache validation logic of
time_modify and not change runs the risk of the client incorrectly
marking stale data as valid. Thus, any cache validation approach
by the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include the use of the change attribute.
</t>
</li>
<li>
Second, modified data must be flushed to the server before closing a
file OPENed for OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE. This is complementary to the first rule. If
the data is not flushed at CLOSE, the revalidation done
after the client OPENs a file is unable to achieve its
purpose. The other aspect to flushing the data before
close is that the data must be committed to stable
storage, at the server, before the CLOSE operation is
requested by the client. In the case of a server restart and a CLOSEd
file, it may not be possible to retransmit the data to be written to
the file, hence, this requirement.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="dc_file_locking" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Caching and File Locking</name>
<t>
For those applications that choose to use byte-range locking instead of
share reservations to exclude inconsistent file access, there is an
analogous set of constraints that apply to client-side data caching.
These rules are effective only if the byte-range locking is used in a way
that matches in an equivalent way the actual READ and WRITE operations
executed. This is as opposed to byte-range locking that is based on pure
convention. For example, it is possible to manipulate a two-megabyte
file by dividing the file into two one-megabyte ranges and protecting
access to the two byte-ranges by byte-range locks on bytes zero and one. A WRITE_LT lock on
byte zero of the file would represent the right to perform
READ and WRITE operations on the first byte-range. A WRITE_LT lock on
byte one of the file would represent the right to perform READ and WRITE
operations on the second byte-range. As long as all applications
manipulating the file obey this convention, they will work on a local
file system. However, they may not work with the NFSv4.1
protocol unless clients refrain from data caching.
</t>
<t>
The rules for data caching in the byte-range locking environment are:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
First, when a client obtains a byte-range lock for a particular byte-range, the
data cache corresponding to that byte-range (if any cache data exists)
must be revalidated. If the change attribute indicates that the file
may have been updated since the cached data was obtained, the client
must flush or invalidate the cached data for the newly locked byte-range.
A client might choose to invalidate all of the non-modified cached data
that it has for the file, but the only requirement for correct
operation is to invalidate all of the data in the newly locked byte-range.
</li>
<li>
Second, before releasing a WRITE_LT lock for a byte-range, all modified data
for that byte-range must be flushed to the server. The modified data must
also be written to stable storage.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that flushing data to the server and the invalidation of cached
data must reflect the actual byte-ranges locked or unlocked. Rounding
these up or down to reflect client cache block boundaries will cause
problems if not carefully done. For example, writing a modified block
when only half of that block is within an area being unlocked may
cause invalid modification to the byte-range outside the unlocked area.
This, in turn, may be part of a byte-range locked by another client.
Clients can avoid this situation by synchronously performing portions
of WRITE operations that overlap that portion (initial or final) that
is not a full block. Similarly, invalidating a locked area that is
not an integral number of full buffer blocks would require the client
to read one or two partial blocks from the server if the revalidation
procedure shows that the data that the client possesses may not be
valid.
</t>
<t>
The data that is written to the server as a prerequisite to the
unlocking of a byte-range must be written, at the server, to stable
storage. The client may accomplish this either with synchronous
writes or by following asynchronous writes with a COMMIT operation.
This is required because retransmission of the modified data after a
server restart might conflict with a lock held by another client.
</t>
<t>
A client implementation may choose to accommodate applications that
use byte-range locking in non-standard ways (e.g., using a byte-range lock as a
global semaphore) by flushing to the server more data upon a LOCKU
than is covered by the locked range. This may include modified data
within files other than the one for which the unlocks are being done.
In such cases, the client must not interfere with applications whose
READs and WRITEs are being done only within the bounds of byte-range locks
that the application holds. For example, an application locks a
single byte of a file and proceeds to write that single byte. A
client that chose to handle a LOCKU by flushing all modified data to
the server could validly write that single byte in response to an
unrelated LOCKU operation. However, it would not be valid to write the entire
block in which that single written byte was located since it includes
an area that is not locked and might be locked by another client.
Client implementations can avoid this problem by dividing files with
modified data into those for which all modifications are done to areas
covered by an appropriate byte-range lock and those for which there are
modifications not covered by a byte-range lock. Any writes done for the
former class of files must not include areas not locked and thus not
modified on the client.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Caching and Mandatory File Locking</name>
<t>
Client-side data caching needs to respect mandatory byte-range locking when
it is in effect. The presence of mandatory byte-range locking for a given
file is indicated when the client gets back NFS4ERR_LOCKED from a READ
or WRITE operation on a file for which it has an appropriate share reservation. When
mandatory locking is in effect for a file, the client must check for
an appropriate byte-range lock for data being read or written. If a byte-range lock
exists for the range being read or written, the client may satisfy the
request using the client's validated cache. If an appropriate
byte-range lock is not held for the range of the read or write, the read or write
request must not be satisfied by the client's cache and the request
must be sent to the server for processing. When a read or write
request partially overlaps a locked byte-range, the request should be
subdivided into multiple pieces with each byte-range (locked or not)
treated appropriately.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="data_caching_and_file_identity" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Caching and File Identity</name>
<t>
When clients cache data, the file data needs to be organized according
to the file system object to which the data belongs. For NFSv3
clients, the typical practice has been to assume for the purpose of
caching that distinct filehandles represent distinct file system
objects. The client then has the choice to organize and maintain the
data cache on this basis.
</t>
<t>
In the NFSv4.1 protocol, there is now the possibility to have
significant deviations from a "one filehandle per object" model
because a filehandle may be constructed on the basis of the object's
pathname. Therefore, clients need a reliable method to determine if
two filehandles designate the same file system object. If clients
were simply to assume that all distinct filehandles denote distinct
objects and proceed to do data caching on this basis, caching
inconsistencies would arise between the distinct client-side objects
that mapped to the same server-side object.
</t>
<t>
By providing a method to differentiate filehandles, the NFSv4.1
protocol alleviates a potential functional regression in comparison
with the NFSv3 protocol. Without this method, caching
inconsistencies within the same client could occur, and this has not
been present in previous versions of the NFS protocol. Note that it
is possible to have such inconsistencies with applications executing
on multiple clients, but that is not the issue being addressed here.
</t>
<t>
For the purposes of data caching, the following steps allow an
NFSv4.1 client to determine whether two distinct filehandles denote
the same server-side object:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If GETATTR directed to two filehandles returns different values of the
fsid attribute, then the filehandles represent distinct objects.
</li>
<li>
If GETATTR for any file with an fsid that matches the fsid of the two
filehandles in question returns a unique_handles attribute with a
value of TRUE, then the two objects are distinct.
</li>
<li>
If GETATTR directed to the two filehandles does not return the fileid
attribute for both of the handles, then it cannot be determined
whether the two objects are the same. Therefore,
operations that depend on that knowledge (e.g.,
client-side data caching) cannot be
done reliably. Note that if GETATTR does not return the fileid
attribute for both filehandles, it will return it for neither of
the filehandles, since the fsid for both filehandles is the same.
</li>
<li>
If GETATTR directed to the two filehandles returns different values
for the fileid attribute, then they are distinct objects.
</li>
<li>
Otherwise, they are the same object.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="open_delegation" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Open Delegation</name>
<t>
When a file is being OPENed, the server may delegate further handling
of opens and closes for that file to the opening client. Any such
delegation is recallable since the circumstances that allowed for the
delegation are subject to change. In particular, if the server
receives a conflicting OPEN from another client, the server must recall
the delegation before deciding whether the OPEN from the other client
may be granted. Making a delegation is up to the server, and clients
should not assume that any particular OPEN either will or will not
result in an OPEN delegation. The following is a typical set of
conditions that servers might use in deciding whether an OPEN should be
delegated:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The client must be able to respond to the
server's callback requests. If a backchannel
has been established, the server will send
a CB_COMPOUND request, containing a single
operation, CB_SEQUENCE, for a test of backchannel
availability.
</li>
<li>
The client must have responded properly to previous recalls.
</li>
<li>
There must be no current OPEN conflicting with the requested
delegation.
</li>
<li>
There should be no current delegation that conflicts with the
delegation being requested.
</li>
<li>
The probability of future conflicting open requests should be
low based on the recent history of the file.
</li>
<li>
The existence of any server-specific semantics of OPEN/CLOSE
that would make the required handling incompatible with the
prescribed handling that the delegated client would apply
(see below).
</li>
</ul>
<t>
There are two types of OPEN delegations: OPEN_DELEGATE_READ and OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE. An OPEN_DELEGATE_READ
delegation allows a client to handle, on its own, requests to open a
file for reading that do not deny OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ access to others. Multiple
OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegations may be outstanding simultaneously and do not
conflict. An OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation allows the client to handle, on its
own, all opens. Only OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation may exist for a given
file at a given time, and it is inconsistent with any OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegations.
</t>
<t>
When a client has an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation, it is assured that
neither the contents, the attributes (with the exception of
time_access), nor the names of any
links to the file will change without its knowledge, so long as the
delegation is held. When a client has an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, it
may modify the file data locally since no other client will be
accessing the file's data. The client holding an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation
may only locally affect file attributes that are intimately
connected with the file data: size, change, time_access,
time_metadata, and time_modify.
All other attributes must be reflected on the server.
</t>
<t>
When a client has an OPEN delegation, it does not need to send OPENs or
CLOSEs to the server. Instead, the client may update the
appropriate status internally. For an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation, opens
that cannot be handled locally (opens that are for OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE/OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH or that
deny OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ access) must be sent to the server.
</t>
<t>
When an OPEN delegation is made, the reply to the OPEN contains an
OPEN delegation structure that specifies the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
the type of delegation (OPEN_DELEGATE_READ or OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE).
</li>
<li>
space limitation information to control flushing of data on close
(OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation only;
see <xref target="open_delegation_caching" format="default"/>)
</li>
<li>
an nfsace4 specifying read and write permissions
</li>
<li>
a stateid to represent the delegation
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The delegation stateid is separate and distinct from the stateid for
the OPEN proper. The standard stateid, unlike the delegation stateid,
is associated with a particular lock-owner and will continue to be
valid after the delegation is recalled and the file remains open.
</t>
<t>
When a request internal to the client is made to open a file and an OPEN
delegation is in effect, it will be accepted or rejected solely on the
basis of the following conditions. Any requirement for other checks
to be made by the delegate should result in the OPEN delegation being
denied so that the checks can be made by the server itself.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The access and deny bits for the request and the file as
described in <xref target="share_reserve" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
The read and write permissions as determined below.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The nfsace4 passed with delegation can be used to avoid frequent
ACCESS calls. The permission check should be as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the nfsace4 indicates that the open may be done, then it should be
granted without reference to the server.
</li>
<li>
If the nfsace4 indicates that the open may not be done, then an ACCESS
request must be sent to the server to obtain the definitive answer.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The server may return an nfsace4 that is more restrictive than the
actual ACL of the file. This includes an nfsace4 that specifies
denial of all access. Note that some common practices such as mapping
the traditional user "root" to the user "nobody" (see <xref target="owner_owner_group" format="default"/>) may make it incorrect
to return the actual ACL of the file in the delegation response.
</t>
<t>
The use of a delegation together with various other forms of caching
creates the possibility that no server authentication and authorization
will ever be
performed for a given user since all of the user's requests might be
satisfied locally. Where the client is depending on the server for
authentication and authorization, the client should be sure authentication and authorization occurs for
each user by use of the ACCESS operation. This should be the case
even if an ACCESS operation would not be required otherwise. As
mentioned before, the server may enforce frequent authentication by
returning an nfsace4 denying all access with every OPEN delegation.
</t>
<section anchor="open_delegation_caching" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Open Delegation and Data Caching</name>
<t>
An OPEN delegation allows much of the message overhead associated with
the opening and closing files to be eliminated. An open when an OPEN
delegation is in effect does not require that a validation
message be sent to the server. The continued endurance of the
"OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation" provides a guarantee that no OPEN
for OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE/OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH, and thus
no write, has occurred. Similarly, when closing a file opened
for OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE/OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH and if an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation is in effect,
the data written does not have to be written to the server until
the OPEN delegation is recalled. The continued endurance of
the OPEN delegation provides a
guarantee that no open, and thus no READ or WRITE, has been done by
another client.
</t>
<t>
For the purposes of OPEN delegation, READs and WRITEs done without an
OPEN are treated as the functional equivalents of a corresponding type
of OPEN. Although a client <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> use special stateids when
an open exists, delegation handling on the server can use the
client ID associated with the current session to determine if the
operation has been done by the holder of the delegation (in which
case, no recall is necessary) or by another client (in which case,
the delegation must be recalled and I/O not proceed until the
delegation is returned or revoked).
</t>
<t>
With delegations, a client is able to avoid writing data to the server
when the CLOSE of a file is serviced. The file close system call is
the usual point at which the client is notified of a lack of stable
storage for the modified file data generated by the application. At
the close, file data is written to the server and, through normal
accounting, the server is able to determine if the available file system
space for the data has been exceeded (i.e., the server returns
NFS4ERR_NOSPC or NFS4ERR_DQUOT). This accounting includes quotas.
The introduction of delegations requires that an alternative method be
in place for the same type of communication to occur between client
and server.
</t>
<t>
In the delegation response, the server provides either the limit of
the size of the file or the number of modified blocks and associated
block size. The server must ensure that the client will be able to
write modified data to the server of a size equal to that provided in the
original delegation. The server must make this assurance for all
outstanding delegations. Therefore, the server must be careful in its
management of available space for new or modified data, taking into
account available file system space and any applicable quotas. The
server can recall delegations as a result of managing the available
file system space. The client should abide by the server's state
space limits for delegations. If the client exceeds the stated limits
for the delegation, the server's behavior is undefined.
</t>
<t>
Based on server conditions, quotas, or available file system space, the
server may grant OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegations with very restrictive space
limitations. The limitations may be defined in a way that will always
force modified data to be flushed to the server on close.
</t>
<t>
With respect to authentication, flushing modified data to the server
after a CLOSE has occurred may be problematic. For example, the user
of the application may have logged off the client, and unexpired
authentication credentials may not be present. In this case, the
client may need to take special care to ensure that local unexpired
credentials will in fact be available. This may be accomplished by
tracking the expiration time of credentials and flushing data well in
advance of their expiration or by making private copies of credentials
to assure their availability when needed.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Open Delegation and File Locks</name>
<t>
When a client holds an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, lock operations are
performed locally. This includes those required for mandatory byte-range
locking. This can be done since the delegation implies that there can
be no conflicting locks. Similarly, all of the revalidations that
would normally be associated with obtaining locks and the flushing of
data associated with the releasing of locks need not be done.
</t>
<t>
When a client holds an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation, lock operations are not
performed locally. All lock operations, including those requesting
non-exclusive locks, are sent to the server for resolution.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="handling_cb_getattr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Handling of CB_GETATTR</name>
<t>
The server needs to employ special handling for a GETATTR where the
target is a file that has an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation in effect. The
reason for this is that the client holding the OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation may
have modified the data, and the server needs to reflect this change to
the second client that submitted the GETATTR. Therefore, the client
holding the OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation needs to be interrogated. The server
will use the CB_GETATTR operation. The only attributes that the
server can reliably query via CB_GETATTR are size and change.
</t>
<t>
Since CB_GETATTR is being used to satisfy another client's GETATTR
request, the server only needs to know if the client holding the
delegation has a modified version of the file. If the client's copy
of the delegated file is not modified (data or size), the server can
satisfy the second client's GETATTR request from the attributes stored
locally at the server. If the file is modified, the server only needs
to know about this modified state. If the server determines that the
file is currently modified, it will respond to the second client's
GETATTR as if the file had been modified locally at the server.
</t>
<t>
Since the form of the change attribute is determined by the server and
is opaque to the client, the client and server need to agree on a
method of communicating the modified state of the file. For the size
attribute, the client will report its current view of the file size.
For the change attribute, the handling is more involved.
</t>
<t>
For the client, the following steps will be taken when receiving an
OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The value of the change attribute will be obtained from the server and
cached. Let this value be represented by c.
</li>
<li>
The client will create a value greater than c that will be used for
communicating that modified data is held at the client. Let this value be
represented by d.
</li>
<li>
When the client is queried via CB_GETATTR for the change attribute, it
checks to see if it holds modified data. If the file is modified, the
value d is returned for the change attribute value. If this file is
not currently modified, the client returns the value c for the change
attribute.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
For simplicity of implementation, the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> for each CB_GETATTR
return the same value d. This is true even if, between successive
CB_GETATTR operations, the client again modifies the file's data or
metadata in its cache. The client can return the same value because
the only requirement is that the client be able to indicate to the
server that the client holds modified data. Therefore, the value of d
may always be c + 1.
</t>
<t>
While the change attribute is opaque to the client in the sense that
it has no idea what units of time, if any, the server is counting
change with, it is not opaque in that the client has to treat it as an
unsigned integer, and the server has to be able to see the results of
the client's changes to that integer. Therefore, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
encode the change attribute in network order when sending it to the
client. The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> decode it from network order to its native
order when receiving it, and the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> encode it in network order
when sending it to the server. For this reason, change is defined as
an unsigned integer rather than an opaque array of bytes.
</t>
<t>
For the server, the following steps will be taken when providing an
OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Upon providing an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, the server will cache a copy of the
change attribute in the data structure it uses to record the
delegation. Let this value be represented by sc.
</li>
<li>
When a second client sends a GETATTR operation on the same file to the
server, the server obtains the change attribute from the first client.
Let this value be cc.
</li>
<li>
If the value cc is equal to sc, the file is not modified and the
server returns the current values for change, time_metadata, and
time_modify (for example) to the second client.
</li>
<li>
If the value cc is NOT equal to sc, the file is currently modified at
the first client and most likely will be modified at the server at a
future time. The server then uses its current time to construct
attribute values for time_metadata and time_modify. A new value of
sc, which we will call nsc, is computed by the server, such that nsc
&gt;= sc + 1. The server then returns the constructed time_metadata,
time_modify, and nsc values to the requester. The server replaces sc
in the delegation record with nsc. To prevent the possibility of
time_modify, time_metadata, and change from appearing to go backward
(which would happen if the client holding the delegation fails to
write its modified data to the server before the delegation is revoked
or returned), the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> update the file's metadata record with
the constructed attribute values. For reasons of reasonable
performance, committing the constructed attribute values to stable
storage is <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
As discussed earlier in this section, the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return the same
cc value on subsequent CB_GETATTR calls, even if the file was modified
in the client's cache yet again between successive CB_GETATTR calls.
Therefore, the server must assume that the file has been modified yet
again, and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> take care to ensure that the new nsc it constructs and
returns is greater than the previous nsc it returned. An example
implementation's delegation record would satisfy this mandate by
including a boolean field (let us call it "modified") that is set to
FALSE when the delegation is granted, and an sc value set at the time
of grant to the change attribute value. The modified field would be
set to TRUE the first time cc != sc, and would stay TRUE until the
delegation is returned or revoked. The processing for constructing
nsc, time_modify, and time_metadata would use this pseudo code:
</t>
<sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[
if (!modified) {
do CB_GETATTR for change and size;
if (cc != sc)
modified = TRUE;
} else {
do CB_GETATTR for size;
}
if (modified) {
sc = sc + 1;
time_modify = time_metadata = current_time;
update sc, time_modify, time_metadata into file's metadata;
}]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This would return to the client (that sent GETATTR) the attributes
it requested, but make sure size comes from what
CB_GETATTR returned. The server would not update the file's
metadata with the client's modified size.
</t>
<t>
In the case that the file attribute size is different than the
server's current value, the server treats this as a modification
regardless of the value of the change attribute retrieved via
CB_GETATTR and responds to the second client as in the last step.
</t>
<t>
This methodology resolves issues of clock differences between client
and server and other scenarios where the use of CB_GETATTR break down.
</t>
<t>
It should be noted that the server is under no obligation to use
CB_GETATTR, and therefore the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> simply recall the delegation
to avoid its use.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Recall of Open Delegation</name>
<t>
The following events necessitate recall of an OPEN delegation:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
potentially conflicting OPEN request (or a READ or WRITE operation
done with a special stateid)
</li>
<li>
SETATTR sent by another client
</li>
<li>
REMOVE request for the file
</li>
<li>
RENAME request for the file as either the source or target of the RENAME
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Whether a RENAME of a directory in the path leading to the file
results in recall of an OPEN delegation depends on the semantics of
the server's file system. If that file system denies such RENAMEs when
a file is open, the recall must be performed to determine whether the
file in question is, in fact, open.
</t>
<t>
In addition to the situations above, the server may choose to recall
OPEN delegations at any time if resource constraints make it advisable
to do so. Clients should always be prepared for the possibility of
recall.
</t>
<t>
When a client receives a recall for an OPEN delegation, it needs
to update state on the server before returning the delegation.
These same updates must be done whenever a client chooses to
return a delegation voluntarily. The following items of state
need to be dealt with:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the file associated with the delegation is no longer open and no
previous CLOSE operation has been sent to the server, a CLOSE
operation must be sent to the server.
</li>
<li>
If a file has other open references at the client, then OPEN
operations must be sent to the server. The appropriate stateids will
be provided by the server for subsequent use by the client since the
delegation stateid will no longer be valid. These OPEN requests are
done with the claim type of CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR. This will allow the
presentation of the delegation stateid so that the client can
establish the appropriate rights to perform the OPEN. (see
<xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/>, which describes the OPEN operation,
for details.)
</li>
<li>
If there are granted byte-range locks, the corresponding LOCK operations
need to be performed. This applies to the OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation case
only.
</li>
<li>
For an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, if
at the time of recall the file is not open for
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE/OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH, all modified
data for the file must be flushed to the
server. If the delegation had not existed, the client would have done
this data flush before the CLOSE operation.
</li>
<li>
For an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation when a file is still open at the time of
recall, any modified data for the file needs to be flushed to the
server.
</li>
<li>
With the OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation in place, it is possible that the file
was truncated during the duration of the delegation. For example, the
truncation could have occurred as a result of an OPEN UNCHECKED with a
size attribute value of zero. Therefore, if a truncation of
the file has occurred and this operation has not been propagated to
the server, the truncation must occur before any modified data is
written to the server.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In the case of OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, byte-range locking imposes some
additional requirements. To precisely maintain the associated
invariant, it is required to flush any modified data in any byte-range for
which a WRITE_LT lock was released while the OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation was in
effect. However, because the OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation implies no other
locking by other clients, a simpler implementation is to flush all
modified data for the file (as described just above) if any WRITE_LT lock
has been released while the OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation was in effect.
</t>
<t>
An implementation need not wait until delegation recall (or
the decision to voluntarily return a delegation) to perform any of the above
actions, if implementation considerations (e.g., resource availability
constraints) make that desirable. Generally, however, the fact that
the actual OPEN state of the file may continue to change makes it not
worthwhile to send information about opens and closes to the server,
except as part of delegation return. An exception is
when the client has no more internal opens of the file. In this
case, sending a CLOSE is useful because it
reduces resource utilization on the client
and server.
Regardless of the client's choices on scheduling these
actions, all must be performed before the delegation is returned,
including (when applicable) the close that corresponds to the OPEN
that resulted in the delegation. These actions can be performed
either in previous requests or in previous operations in the same
COMPOUND request.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Clients That Fail to Honor Delegation Recalls</name>
<t>
A client may fail to respond to a recall for various reasons, such as
a failure of the backchannel from server to the client. The client
may be unaware of a failure in the backchannel. This lack of
awareness could result in the client finding out long after the
failure that its delegation has been revoked, and another client has
modified the data for which the client had a delegation. This is
especially a problem for the client that held an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation.
</t>
<t>
Status bits returned by SEQUENCE operations help to provide an
alternate way of informing the client of issues regarding the
status of the backchannel and of recalled delegations. When the
backchannel is not available, the server returns the status bit
SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN on SEQUENCE operations. The client can
react by attempting to re-establish the backchannel and by
returning recallable objects if a backchannel cannot be successfully
re-established.
</t>
<t>
Whether the backchannel is functioning or not, it may be that the
recalled delegation is not returned. Note that the client's lease
might still be renewed, even though the recalled delegation is not
returned. In this situation, servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> revoke delegations that
are not returned in a period of time equal to the lease period. This
period of time should allow the client time to note the
backchannel-down status and re-establish the backchannel.
</t>
<t>
When delegations are revoked, the server will return with the
SEQ4_STATUS_RECALLABLE_STATE_REVOKED status bit set on subsequent
SEQUENCE operations. The client should note this and then use
TEST_STATEID to find which delegations have been revoked.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Delegation Revocation</name>
<t>
At the point a delegation is revoked, if there are associated opens
on the client, these opens may or may not be revoked. If no
byte-range lock or open is granted that is inconsistent with the existing open,
the stateid for the open may remain valid and be disconnected
from the revoked delegation, just as would be the case if the
delegation were returned.
</t>
<t>
For example, if an OPEN for OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH with a deny of OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE is
associated with the delegation, granting of another such OPEN
to a different client will revoke the delegation but need not
revoke the OPEN, since the two OPENs are consistent with each other.
On the other hand, if an OPEN denying write access is
granted, then the existing OPEN must be revoked.
</t>
<t>
When opens and/or locks are revoked,
the applications holding these opens or locks need to be notified.
This notification usually occurs by returning errors for READ/WRITE
operations or when a close is attempted for the open file.
</t>
<t>
If no opens exist for the file at the point the delegation is revoked,
then notification of the revocation is unnecessary. However, if there
is modified data present at the client for the file, the user of the
application should be notified. Unfortunately, it may not be possible
to notify the user since active applications may not be present at the
client. See <xref target="revocation_recovery_write" format="default"/>
for additional details.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="via_want_delegation" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Delegations via WANT_DELEGATION</name>
<t>
In addition to providing delegations as part of the reply
to OPEN operations, servers <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> provide delegations
separate from open, via the <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> WANT_DELEGATION operation. This
allows delegations to be obtained in advance of an OPEN that
might benefit from them, for objects that are not a valid target
of OPEN, or to deal with cases in which a
delegation has been recalled and the client wants to make
an attempt to re-establish it if the absence of use by other
clients allows that.
</t>
<t>
The WANT_DELEGATION operation may be performed on any type of
file object other than a directory.
</t>
<t>
When a delegation is obtained using WANT_DELEGATION, any open
files for the same filehandle held by that client are to be
treated as subordinate to the delegation, just as if they had
been created using an OPEN of type CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR. They are
otherwise unchanged as to seqid, access and deny modes, and the
relationship with byte-range locks. Similarly, because
existing byte-range
locks are subordinate to an open, those byte-range locks also become
indirectly subordinate to that new delegation.
</t>
<t>
The WANT_DELEGATION operation provides for delivery of delegations
via callbacks, when the delegations are not immediately available.
When a requested delegation is available, it is delivered to the
client via a CB_PUSH_DELEG operation. When this happens, open files
for the same filehandle become subordinate to the new delegation
at the point at which the delegation is delivered, just as if they had
been created using an OPEN of type CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR.
Similarly, this occurs for existing byte-range locks subordinate to an open.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="data_caching_revocation" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Caching and Revocation</name>
<t>
When locks and delegations are revoked, the assumptions upon which
successful caching depends are no longer guaranteed. For any locks or
share reservations that have been revoked, the corresponding state-owner
needs to be notified. This notification includes applications with a
file open that has a corresponding delegation that has been revoked.
Cached data associated with the revocation must be removed from the
client. In the case of modified data existing in the client's cache,
that data must be removed from the client without being written to
the server. As mentioned, the assumptions made by the client are no
longer valid at the point when a lock or delegation has been revoked.
For example, another client may have been granted a conflicting byte-range lock
after the revocation of the byte-range lock at the first client. Therefore, the
data within the lock range may have been modified by the other client.
Obviously, the first client is unable to guarantee to the application
what has occurred to the file in the case of revocation.
</t>
<t>
Notification to a state-owner will in many cases consist of simply
returning an error on the next and all subsequent READs/WRITEs to the
open file or on the close. Where the methods available to a client
make such notification impossible because errors for certain
operations may not be returned, more drastic action such as signals or
process termination may be appropriate. The justification here is
that an invariant on which an application depends may be violated.
Depending on how errors are typically treated for the client-operating
environment, further levels of notification including logging, console
messages, and GUI pop-ups may be appropriate.
</t>
<section anchor="revocation_recovery_write" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Revocation Recovery for Write Open Delegation</name>
<t>
Revocation recovery for an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation poses the special
issue of modified data in the client cache while the file is not open.
In this situation, any client that does not flush modified data to
the server on each close must ensure that the user receives
appropriate notification of the failure as a result of the revocation.
Since such situations may require human action to correct problems,
notification schemes in which the appropriate user or administrator is
notified may be necessary. Logging and console messages are typical
examples.
</t>
<t>
If there is modified data on the client, it must not be flushed
normally to the server. A client may attempt to provide a copy of the
file data as modified during the delegation under a different name in
the file system namespace to ease recovery. Note that when the
client can determine that the file has not been modified by any other
client, or when the client has a complete cached copy of the file in
question, such a saved copy of the client's view of the file may be of
particular value for recovery. In another case, recovery using a copy
of the file based partially on the client's cached data and partially
on the server's copy as modified by other clients will be anything but
straightforward, so clients may avoid saving file contents in these
situations or specially mark the results to warn users of possible
problems.
</t>
<t>
Saving of such modified data in delegation revocation situations
may be limited to files of a certain size or might be used only when
sufficient disk space is available within the target file system.
Such saving may also be restricted to situations when the client has
sufficient buffering resources to keep the cached copy available
until it is properly stored to the target file system.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute Caching</name>
<t>
This section pertains to the caching of a file's attributes on a client
when that client does not hold a delegation on the file.
</t>
<t>
The attributes discussed in this section do not include named
attributes. Individual named attributes are analogous to files, and
caching of the data for these needs to be handled just as data caching
is for ordinary files. Similarly, LOOKUP results from an OPENATTR
directory (as well as the directory's contents) are to be cached on
the same basis as any other pathnames.
</t>
<t>
Clients may cache file attributes obtained from the server and use
them to avoid subsequent GETATTR requests. Such caching is write
through in that modification to file attributes is always done by
means of requests to the server and should not be done locally and
should not be cached. The exception to this are modifications to attributes that
are intimately connected with data caching. Therefore, extending a
file by writing data to the local data cache is reflected immediately
in the size as seen on the client without this change being
immediately reflected on the server. Normally, such changes are not
propagated directly to the server, but when the modified data is
flushed to the server, analogous attribute changes are made on the
server. When OPEN delegation is in effect, the modified attributes
may be returned to the server in reaction to a CB_RECALL call.
</t>
<t>
The result of local caching of attributes is that the attribute
caches maintained on individual clients will not be coherent.
Changes made in one order on the server may be seen in a different
order on one client and in a third order on another client.
</t>
<t>
The typical file system application programming interfaces do not
provide means to atomically modify or interrogate attributes for
multiple files at the same time. The following rules provide an
environment where the potential incoherencies mentioned above can be
reasonably managed. These rules are derived from the practice of
previous NFS protocols.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
All attributes for a given file (per-fsid attributes excepted) are
cached as a unit at the client so that no non-serializability can
arise within the context of a single file.
</li>
<li>
An upper time boundary is maintained on how long a client cache entry
can be kept without being refreshed from the server.
</li>
<li>
When operations are performed that change attributes at the server,
the updated attribute set is requested as part of the containing RPC.
This includes directory operations that update attributes indirectly.
This is accomplished by following the modifying operation with a
GETATTR operation and then using the results of the GETATTR to update
the client's cached attributes.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that if the full set of attributes to be cached is requested by
READDIR, the results can be cached by the client on the same basis as
attributes obtained via GETATTR.
</t>
<t>
A client may validate its cached version of attributes for a file by
fetching both the change and time_access attributes and assuming
that if the change attribute has the same value as it did when the
attributes were cached, then no attributes other than time_access have
changed. The reason why time_access is also fetched is because many
servers operate in environments where the operation that updates
change does not update time_access. For example, POSIX file semantics
do not update access time when a file is modified by the write system
call <xref target="write_atime" format="default"/>. Therefore, the client that wants a current time_access value
should fetch it with change during the attribute cache validation
processing and update its cached time_access.
</t>
<t>
The client may maintain a cache of modified attributes for those
attributes intimately connected with data of modified regular files
(size, time_modify, and change). Other than those three attributes,
the client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> maintain a cache of modified attributes. Instead,
attribute changes are immediately sent to the server.
</t>
<t>
In some operating environments, the equivalent to time_access is
expected to be implicitly updated by each read of the content of the
file object. If an NFS client is caching the content of a file
object, whether it is a regular file, directory, or symbolic link, the
client <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> update the time_access attribute (via SETATTR or a
small READ or READDIR request) on the server with each read that is
satisfied from cache. The reason is that this can defeat the
performance benefits of caching content, especially since an explicit
SETATTR of time_access may alter the change attribute on the server.
If the change attribute changes, clients that are caching the content
will think the content has changed, and will re-read unmodified data
from the server. Nor is the client encouraged to maintain a modified
version of time_access in its cache, since the client either would
eventually have to write the access time to the server
with bad performance effects or never update the
server's time_access, thereby resulting in a situation where an
application that caches access time between a close and open of
the same file observes the access time oscillating between the past and
present. The time_access attribute always means the time of last
access to a file by a read that was satisfied by the server. This way
clients will tend to see only time_access changes that go forward in
time.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data and Metadata Caching and Memory Mapped Files</name>
<t>
Some operating environments include the capability for an application
to map a file's content into the application's address space. Each
time the application accesses a memory location that corresponds to a
block that has not been loaded into the address space, a page fault
occurs and the file is read (or if the block does not exist in the
file, the block is allocated and then instantiated in the
application's address space).
</t>
<t>
As long as each memory-mapped access to the file requires a page
fault, the relevant attributes of the file that are used to detect
access and modification (time_access, time_metadata, time_modify, and
change) will be updated. However, in many operating environments,
when page faults are not required, these attributes will not be updated
on reads or updates to the file via memory access (regardless of
whether the file is local or is accessed remotely). A client or
server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> fail to update attributes of a file that is being accessed
via memory-mapped I/O. This has several implications:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If there is an application on the server that has memory mapped a file
that a client is also accessing, the client may not be able to get a
consistent value of the change attribute to determine
whether or not its cache is stale. A server that knows that
the file is memory-mapped could always pessimistically
return updated values for change so as to force the
application to always get the most up-to-date data
and metadata for the file. However, due to the negative performance
implications of this, such behavior is <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>.
</li>
<li>
If the memory-mapped file is not being modified on the server, and
instead is just being read by an application via the memory-mapped
interface, the client will not see an updated time_access attribute.
However, in many operating environments, neither will any process
running on the server. Thus, NFS clients are at no disadvantage with
respect to local processes.
</li>
<li>
If there is another client that is memory mapping the file, and if
that client is holding an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, the same set of issues as
discussed in the previous two bullet points apply. So, when a server
does a CB_GETATTR to a file that the client has modified in its cache,
the reply from CB_GETATTR will not necessarily be accurate. As
discussed earlier, the client's obligation is to report that the file
has been modified since the delegation was granted, not whether it has
been modified again between successive CB_GETATTR calls, and the
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> assume that any file the client has modified in cache has
been modified again between successive CB_GETATTR calls. Depending on
the nature of the client's memory management system, this weak
obligation may not be possible. A client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return stale information
in CB_GETATTR whenever the file is memory-mapped.
</li>
<li>
<t>
The mixture of memory mapping and byte-range locking on the same file is
problematic. Consider the following scenario, where a page size on
each client is 8192 bytes.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Client A memory maps the first page (8192 bytes) of file X.
</li>
<li>
Client B memory maps the first page (8192 bytes) of file X.
</li>
<li>
Client A WRITE_LT locks the first 4096 bytes.
</li>
<li>
Client B WRITE_LT locks the second 4096 bytes.
</li>
<li>
Client A, via a STORE instruction, modifies part of its locked byte-range.
</li>
<li>
Simultaneous to client A, client B executes a STORE on part of its
locked byte-range.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Here the challenge is for each client to resynchronize to get a
correct view of the first page. In many operating environments, the
virtual memory management systems on each client only know a page is
modified, not that a subset of the page corresponding to the
respective lock byte-ranges has been modified. So it is not possible for
each client to do the right thing, which is to write to the
server only that portion of the page that is locked. For example, if
client A simply writes out the page, and then client B writes out the
page, client A's data is lost.
</t>
<t>
Moreover, if mandatory locking is enabled on the file, then we have a
different problem. When clients A and B execute the STORE instructions,
the resulting page faults require a byte-range lock on the entire page.
Each client then tries to extend their locked range to the entire
page, which results in a deadlock. Communicating the NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK
error to a STORE instruction is difficult at best.
</t>
<t>
If a client is locking the entire memory-mapped file, there is no
problem with advisory or mandatory byte-range locking, at least until the
client unlocks a byte-range in the middle of the file.
</t>
<t>
Given the above issues, the following are permitted:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Clients and servers <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> deny memory mapping a file for which they know there are
byte-range locks.
</li>
<li>
Clients and servers <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> deny a byte-range lock on a file they know is
memory-mapped.
</li>
<li>
A client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> deny memory mapping a file that it knows requires
mandatory locking for I/O. If mandatory locking is enabled after the
file is opened and mapped, the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> deny the application further
access to its mapped file.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="without_dir_deleg" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Name and Directory Caching without Directory Delegations</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 directory delegation facility
(described in <xref target="dir_deleg" format="default"/> below) is <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>
for servers to implement. Even where it is
implemented, it may not always be functional because of resource
availability issues or other constraints. Thus, it is
important to understand how name and directory caching are done
in the absence of directory delegations. These topics are
discussed in the next two subsections.
</t>
<section anchor="name_caching" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Name Caching</name>
<t>
The results of LOOKUP and READDIR operations may be cached to avoid
the cost of subsequent LOOKUP operations. Just as in the case of
attribute caching, inconsistencies may arise among the various client
caches. To mitigate the effects of these inconsistencies and given
the context of typical file system APIs, an upper time boundary is
maintained for how long a client name cache entry can be kept without
verifying that the entry has not been made invalid by a directory
change operation performed by another client.
</t>
<t>
When a client is not making changes to a directory for which there
exist name cache entries, the client needs to periodically fetch
attributes for that directory to ensure that it is not being modified.
After determining that no modification has occurred, the expiration
time for the associated name cache entries may be updated to be the
current time plus the name cache staleness bound.
</t>
<t>
When a client is making changes to a given directory, it needs to
determine whether there have been changes made to the directory by
other clients. It does this by using the change attribute as reported
before and after the directory operation in the associated
change_info4 value returned for the operation. The server is able to
communicate to the client whether the change_info4 data is provided
atomically with respect to the directory operation. If the change
values are provided atomically, the client has a basis for determining,
given proper care, whether other clients are modifying the directory
in question.
</t>
<t>
The simplest way to enable the client to make this determination is
for the client to serialize all changes made to a specific directory.
When this is done, and the server provides before and after values of the
change attribute atomically, the client can simply compare the
after value of the change attribute from one operation on a
directory with the before value on the subsequent operation
modifying that directory. When these are equal, the client is
assured that no other client is modifying the directory in question.
</t>
<t>
When such serialization is not used, and there may be multiple
simultaneous outstanding operations modifying a single directory sent
from a single client, making this sort of determination can be more
complicated. If two such operations
complete in a different order than they were actually performed,
that might give an appearance consistent with modification being
made by another client. Where this appears to happen, the client
needs to await the completion of all such modifications that were
started previously, to see if the outstanding before and after
change numbers can be sorted into a chain such that the before
value of one change number matches the after value of a previous
one, in a chain consistent with this client being the only one
modifying the directory.
</t>
<t>
In either of these cases, the client is able to determine whether
the directory is being modified by another client.
If the comparison indicates that the directory was updated by
another client, the name cache associated with the modified directory
is purged from the client. If the comparison indicates no
modification, the name cache can be updated on the client to reflect
the directory operation and the associated timeout can be extended. The
post-operation change value needs to be saved as the basis for future
change_info4 comparisons.
</t>
<t>
As demonstrated by the scenario above, name caching requires that the
client revalidate name cache data by inspecting the change attribute
of a directory at the point when the name cache item was cached. This
requires that the server update the change attribute for directories
when the contents of the corresponding directory is modified. For a
client to use the change_info4 information appropriately and
correctly, the server must report the pre- and post-operation change
attribute values atomically. When the server is unable to report the
before and after values atomically with respect to the directory
operation, the server must indicate that fact in the change_info4
return value. When the information is not atomically reported, the
client should not assume that other clients have not changed the
directory.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Directory Caching</name>
<t>
The results of READDIR operations may be used to avoid subsequent
READDIR operations. Just as in the cases of attribute and name
caching, inconsistencies may arise among the various client caches. To
mitigate the effects of these inconsistencies, and given the context of
typical file system APIs, the following rules should be followed:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Cached READDIR information for a directory that is not obtained in a
single READDIR operation must always be a consistent snapshot of
directory contents. This is determined by using a GETATTR before the
first READDIR and after the last READDIR that contributes to the
cache.
</li>
<li>
An upper time boundary is maintained to indicate the length of time a
directory cache entry is considered valid before the client must
revalidate the cached information.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The revalidation technique parallels that discussed in the case of
name caching. When the client is not changing the directory in
question, checking the change attribute of the directory with GETATTR
is adequate. The lifetime of the cache entry can be extended at these
checkpoints. When a client is modifying the directory, the client
needs to use the change_info4 data to determine whether there are
other clients modifying the directory. If it is determined that no
other client modifications are occurring, the client may update its
directory cache to reflect its own changes.
</t>
<t>
As demonstrated previously, directory caching requires that the client
revalidate directory cache data by inspecting the change attribute of
a directory at the point when the directory was cached. This requires
that the server update the change attribute for directories when the
contents of the corresponding directory is modified. For a client to
use the change_info4 information appropriately and correctly, the
server must report the pre- and post-operation change attribute values
atomically. When the server is unable to report the before and after
values atomically with respect to the directory operation, the server
must indicate that fact in the change_info4 return value. When the
information is not atomically reported, the client should not assume
that other clients have not changed the directory.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="dir_deleg" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Directory Delegations</name>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Introduction to Directory Delegations</name>
<t>
Directory caching for the NFSv4.1 protocol, as previously
described, is similar to file
caching in previous versions. Clients typically cache
directory information for
a duration determined by the client. At the end of a predefined
timeout, the client will query the server to see if the directory has
been updated. By caching attributes, clients reduce the number of
GETATTR calls made to the server to validate attributes. Furthermore,
frequently accessed files and directories, such as the current
working directory, have their attributes cached on the client so that
some NFS operations can be performed without having to make an RPC
call. By caching name and inode information about most recently
looked up entries in a Directory Name Lookup Cache (DNLC), clients do
not need to send LOOKUP calls to the server every time these files
are accessed.
</t>
<t>
This caching approach works reasonably well at reducing network
traffic in many environments. However, it does not address
environments where there are numerous queries for files that do not
exist. In these cases of "misses", the client sends requests to
the server in order to provide reasonable application semantics and
promptly detect the creation of new directory entries. Examples of
high miss activity are compilation in software development
environments. The current behavior of NFS limits its potential
scalability and wide-area sharing effectiveness in these types of
environments. Other distributed stateful file system architectures
such as AFS and DFS have proven that adding state around directory
contents can greatly reduce network traffic in high-miss
environments.
</t>
<t>
Delegation of directory contents is an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> feature of NFSv4.1.
Directory delegations provide similar traffic reduction
benefits as with file delegations. By allowing clients to cache
directory contents (in a read-only fashion) while being notified of
changes, the client can avoid making frequent requests to interrogate
the contents of slowly-changing directories, reducing network traffic
and improving client performance. It can also simplify the task of
determining whether other clients are making changes to the directory
when the client itself is making many changes to the directory and
changes are not serialized.
</t>
<t>
Directory delegations allow improved namespace cache consistency to be
achieved through delegations and synchronous recalls, in the absence
of notifications. In addition, if time-based consistency is
sufficient, asynchronous notifications can provide performance
benefits for the client, and possibly the server, under some common
operating conditions such as slowly-changing and/or very large
directories.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Directory Delegation Design</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 introduces the GET_DIR_DELEGATION
(<xref target="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION" format="default"/>) operation to allow the
client to ask for a
directory delegation. The delegation covers directory attributes and
all entries in the directory. If either of these change, the
delegation will be recalled synchronously. The operation causing the
recall will have to wait before the recall is complete. Any changes
to directory entry attributes will not cause the delegation to be
recalled.
</t>
<t>
In addition to asking for delegations, a client can also ask for
notifications for certain events. These events include changes to
the directory's attributes and/or its contents. If a client asks for
notification for a certain event, the server will notify the client
when that event occurs. This will not result in the delegation being
recalled for that client. The notifications are asynchronous and
provide a way of avoiding recalls in situations where a directory is
changing enough that the pure recall model may not be effective while
trying to allow the client to get substantial benefit. In the absence
of notifications, once the delegation is recalled the client has to
refresh its directory cache; this might not be very efficient for
very large directories.
</t>
<t>
The delegation is read-only and the client may not make changes to
the directory other than by performing NFSv4.1 operations that modify
the directory or the associated file attributes so that the server
has knowledge of these changes. In order to keep the client's
namespace synchronized with that of the server, the server will notify
the delegation-holding client (assuming it has requested
notifications) of the changes made as a result of that client's
directory-modifying operations. This is to avoid any need for
that client to send subsequent GETATTR or READDIR operations
to the server. If a single client is holding the delegation
and that client makes any changes to the directory (i.e., the
changes are made via operations sent on a session
associated with the client ID holding the delegation), the
delegation will not be recalled. Multiple clients may hold a delegation
on the same directory, but if any such client modifies the directory,
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> recall the delegation from the other clients,
unless those clients have made provisions to be notified of that
sort of modification.
</t>
<t>
Delegations can be recalled by the server at any time. Normally, the
server will recall the delegation when the directory changes in a way
that is not covered by the notification, or when the directory
changes and notifications have not been requested.
If another client removes the directory for
which a delegation has been granted, the server will recall the
delegation.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attributes in Support of Directory Notifications</name>
<t>
See <xref target="dir_not_attrs" format="default"/> for a description of the attributes
associated with directory notifications.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Directory Delegation Recall</name>
<t>
The server will recall the directory delegation by sending a callback
to the client. It will use the same callback procedure as used for
recalling file delegations. The server will recall the delegation
when the directory changes in a way that is not covered by the
notification. However, the server need not recall the delegation if
attributes of an entry within the directory change.
</t>
<t>
If the
server notices that handing out a delegation for a directory is
causing too many notifications to be sent out, it may decide to
not hand out delegations for that directory and/or recall those already
granted. If a client tries to remove the directory for which
a delegation has been granted, the server will recall all associated delegations.
</t>
<t>
The implementation sections for a number
of operations describe situations in which notification or
delegation recall would be required under some common circumstances.
In this regard, a similar set of caveats to those listed
in <xref target="deleg_and_cb" format="default"/> apply.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
For CREATE, see <xref target="OP_CREATE_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For LINK, see <xref target="OP_LINK_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For OPEN, see <xref target="OP_OPEN_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For REMOVE, see <xref target="OP_REMOVE_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For RENAME, see <xref target="OP_RENAME_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
For SETATTR, see <xref target="OP_SETATTR_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Directory Delegation Recovery</name>
<t>
Recovery from client or server restart for state on regular files
has two main goals: avoiding the necessity of
breaking application guarantees with respect to locked files and
delivery of updates cached at the client. Neither of these
goals applies to directories protected by OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegations and
notifications. Thus, no provision is made for reclaiming
directory delegations in the event of client or server restart.
The client can simply establish a directory delegation in the
same fashion as was done initially.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="NEW11" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Multi-Server Namespace</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 supports attributes that allow a namespace to extend
beyond the boundaries of a single server. It is desirable
that clients and servers support construction of such
multi-server namespaces. Use of such multi-server namespaces
is <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>; however, and for many purposes,
single-server namespaces are perfectly acceptable. The use
of multi-server namespaces can provide many advantages
by separating a file system's logical position in a namespace
from the (possibly changing) logistical and administrative
considerations that cause a particular file system to be
located on a particular server via a single network access
path that has to be known in advance or determined using DNS.
</t>
<section anchor="SEC11-TERM" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Terminology</name>
<t>
In this section as a whole (i.e., within all of <xref target="NEW11" format="default"/>),
the phrase "client ID" always refers to the
64-bit shorthand identifier assigned by the server (a clientid4)
and never to the structure that the client uses to identify itself
to the server (called an nfs_client_id4 or client_owner in NFSv4.0
and NFSv4.1, respectively). The opaque identifier within those
structures is referred to as a "client id string".
</t>
<section anchor="SEC11-TERM-trunking" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Terminology Related to Trunking</name>
<t>
It is particularly important to clarify the distinction
between trunking detection and trunking discovery.
The definitions we present are applicable to all
minor versions of NFSv4, but we will focus on how
these terms apply to NFS version 4.1.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Trunking detection refers to ways of deciding whether two
specific network
addresses are connected to the same NFSv4 server. The
means available to make this determination depends on the protocol
version, and, in some cases, on the client implementation.
</t>
<t>
In the case of NFS version 4.1 and later minor versions, the
means of
trunking detection are as described in this document
and are available to every client. Two network addresses
connected to the same server can always be used together
to access a particular server
but cannot necessarily be used together
to access a single session. See below for definitions
of the terms "server-trunkable" and "session-trunkable".
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Trunking discovery is a process by which a client using one
network address can obtain other addresses that are connected
to the same server.
Typically, it builds on a trunking detection facility by providing
one or more methods by which candidate addresses are made
available to the client,
who can then use trunking detection to appropriately filter them.
</t>
<t>
Despite the support for trunking detection, there was no
description of trunking discovery provided in
RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>, making it necessary to provide
those means in this document.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The combination of a server network address and a particular
connection type to be used by a connection
is referred to as a "server endpoint". Although using different
connection types may result in different ports being used, the
use of different ports by multiple connections to the same
network address in such cases is not the essence of the distinction
between the two endpoints used. This is in contrast to the case
of port-specific endpoints,
in which the explicit specification of port numbers within network
addresses is used to allow a single server node to support multiple
NFS servers.
</t>
<t>
Two network addresses connected to the same server are said to
be server-trunkable. Two such addresses support the use of
client ID trunking, as described in <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Two network addresses connected to the same server such that
those addresses can be used to support a single common session
are referred to as session-trunkable. Note that two addresses
may be server-trunkable without being session-trunkable, and that,
when two connections of different connection types are made
to the same network address and are based on a single file
system location entry, they are always
session-trunkable, independent of the connection type, as
specified by <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>, since their derivation from
the same file system location entry, together with the identity of
their network addresses, assures that both connections are to the
same server and will return server-owner information, allowing
session trunking to be used.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-TERM-loc" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Terminology Related to File System Location</name>
<t>
Regarding the terminology that relates to the construction of multi-server
namespaces out of a set of local per-server namespaces:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Each server has a set of exported file systems that may be accessed
by NFSv4 clients. Typically, this is done by assigning each
file system a name within the pseudo-fs associated with the
server, although the pseudo-fs may be dispensed with if there
is only a single exported file system. Each such file system
is part of the server's local namespace, and can be considered
as a file system instance within a larger multi-server namespace.
</li>
<li>
The set of all exported file systems for a given server
constitutes that server's local namespace.
</li>
<li>
In some cases, a server will have a namespace more extensive
than its local namespace by using features associated with
attributes that provide file system location information.
These features,
which allow construction of a multi-server namespace,
are all described in individual sections below and include
referrals (<xref target="SEC11-USES-ref" format="default"/>),
migration (<xref target="SEC11-USES-migr" format="default"/>), and
replication (<xref target="SEC11-USES-repl" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
A file system present in a server's pseudo-fs may have multiple
file system instances on different servers associated with it.
All such instances are considered replicas of one another.
Whether such replicas can be used simultaneously is discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-simul" format="default"/>, while the level of
coordination between them (important when switching
between them) is discussed in Sections
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-fh" format="counter"/>
through <xref target="SEC11-EFF-data" format="counter"/> below.
</li>
<li>
When a file system is present in a server's pseudo-fs, but
there is no corresponding local file system, it is said to
be "absent". In such cases, all associated instances will
be accessed on other servers.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Regarding the terminology that relates to attributes used in trunking
discovery and other multi-server namespace features:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
File system location attributes include the fs_locations and
fs_locations_info attributes.
</li>
<li>
<t>
File system location entries provide the individual file system
locations within the file system location attributes.
Each such entry specifies a
server, in the form of a hostname or an address, and an fs name,
which designates the location of the file system within
the server's local namespace. A file system location entry designates a set
of server endpoints to which the client may establish connections.
There may be multiple endpoints because a hostname may map to
multiple network addresses and because multiple connection types
may be
used to communicate with a single network address. However,
except where explicit port numbers are used to designate a set
of servers within a single server node, all
such endpoints <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> designate a way of connecting to a single server.
The exact form of the location entry varies with the
particular file system location attribute used, as described in
<xref target="SEC11-loc-attr" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
The network addresses used in file system location entries
typically appear without port number indications and are
used to designate a server at one of the standard ports for NFS access,
e.g., 2049 for TCP or 20049 for use with RPC-over-RDMA. Port
numbers may be used
in file system location entries to designate servers (typically
user-level ones) accessed using other port numbers. In the case where
network addresses indicate trunking relationships, the use of an explicit
port number is inappropriate since trunking is a relationship between
network addresses. See <xref target="SEC11-USES-trunk" format="default"/> for
details.
</t>
</li>
<li>
File system location elements are derived from
location entries, and each
describes a particular network access path consisting of a network
address and a location within the server's local namespace.
Such location elements need not appear
within a file system location attribute, but the
existence of each location element derives from a corresponding
location entry. When a
location entry specifies an IP address, there is only a single
corresponding location element. File system location entries that
contain a hostname are resolved using DNS, and may result
in one or more location elements. All location elements
consist of a location address that includes the IP address of
an interface to a server and an fs name, which is the location
of the file system within the server's local namespace. The fs name
can be empty if the server has no pseudo-fs and only a single exported
file system at the root filehandle.
</li>
<li>
Two file system location elements are said to be
server-trunkable if they
specify the same fs name and the location addresses are such
that the location addresses are server-trunkable. When the
corresponding network paths are used, the client will always be
able to use client ID trunking, but will only be able to use
session trunking if the paths are also session-trunkable.
</li>
<li>
Two file system location elements are said to be session-trunkable
if they
specify the same fs name and the location addresses are such
that the location addresses are session-trunkable. When the
corresponding network paths are used, the client will be able to
able to use either client ID trunking or session trunking.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Discussion of the term "replica" is complicated by the fact that
the term was used in RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> with a meaning
different from that used in this document. In short,
in <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> each replica is identified by a
single network access path, while in the current document, a set
of network access paths that have server-trunkable network
addresses and the same root-relative file system pathname is
considered to be a single replica with multiple network access
paths.
</t>
<t>
Each set of server-trunkable location elements defines a set of
available network access paths to a particular file system.
When there
are multiple such file systems, each of which containing the
same data, these file systems are considered replicas
of one another. Logically, such replication
is symmetric, since the fs currently in use and an alternate fs
are replicas of each other. Often, in other documents, the term
"replica" is not applied to the fs currently in use, despite the
fact that the replication relation is inherently symmetric.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-loc-attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Location Attributes</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 contains attributes that provide information
about how a given file system may be accessed
(i.e., at what network address and namespace position). As a result, file systems
in the namespace of one server can be
associated with one or more instances of that
file system on other servers. These attributes contain file
system location
entries specifying a server address
target (either as a DNS name representing one or more IP
addresses or as a specific IP address) together with the pathname
of that file system within the associated single-server namespace.
</t>
<t>
The fs_locations_info <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attribute
allows specification of one or more file system instance locations
where the data corresponding to a given file
system may be found.
In addition to the specification of file system instance locations,
this attribute provides helpful information to do the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Guide choices among the various file system instances
provided (e.g., priority for use, writability, currency, etc.).
</li>
<li>
Help the client efficiently effect as seamless
a transition as possible among multiple file system instances,
when and if that should be necessary.
</li>
<li>
Guide the selection of the appropriate
connection type to be used when establishing a connection.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Within the fs_locations_info attribute, each
fs_locations_server4 entry corresponds to a file system
location entry: the fls_server field designates the server,
and the fl_rootpath field of the encompassing fs_locations_item4
gives the location pathname within the server's pseudo-fs.
</t>
<t>
The fs_locations attribute defined in NFSv4.0 is also a part of
NFSv4.1. This attribute only allows specification of the file system
locations where the data corresponding to a given file
system may be found. Servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> make this attribute available
whenever fs_locations_info is supported, but client use of
fs_locations_info is preferable because it provides more information.
</t>
<t>
Within the fs_locations attribute, each fs_location4 contains a
file system location entry with the server field designating
the server and the rootpath field giving the location pathname
within the server's pseudo-fs.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="presence_or_absence" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Presence or Absence</name>
<t>
A given location in an NFSv4.1 namespace (typically but not necessarily
a multi-server namespace) can have a number of file system instance
locations
associated with it (via the fs_locations or fs_locations_info
attribute). There may also be an actual current file system at
that location, accessible via normal namespace operations (e.g.,
LOOKUP). In this case, the file system is said to be
"present" at that position in the namespace, and clients will
typically use it, reserving use of additional locations
specified via the location-related attributes to situations in
which the principal location is no longer available.
</t>
<t>
When there is no actual file system at the namespace location
in question, the file system is said to be "absent". An absent
file system contains no files or directories other than the
root. Any reference to it, except
to access a small set of attributes useful in determining
alternate locations, will result in an error, NFS4ERR_MOVED.
Note that if the server ever returns the error NFS4ERR_MOVED,
it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the fs_locations
attribute and <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support the fs_locations_info and fs_status
attributes.
</t>
<t>
While the error name suggests that we have a case of a file system
that once was present, and has only become absent later, this is
only one possibility. A position in the namespace may be permanently
absent with the set of file system(s) designated by the location
attributes being the only realization.
The name NFS4ERR_MOVED reflects an earlier,
more limited conception of its function, but this error will be
returned whenever the referenced file system is absent, whether it
has moved or not.
</t>
<t>
Except in the case of GETATTR-type operations (to be discussed
later), when the
current filehandle at the start of an operation is within an
absent file system, that operation is not performed and the error
NFS4ERR_MOVED is returned, to indicate that the file system is
absent on the current server.
</t>
<t>
Because a GETFH cannot succeed if the current filehandle is
within an absent file system, filehandles within an absent
file system cannot be transferred to the client. When a
client does have filehandles within an absent file system, it
is the result of obtaining them when the file system was
present, and having the file system become
absent subsequently.
</t>
<t>
It should be noted that because the check for the current
filehandle being within an absent file system happens at the
start of every operation, operations that change the current
filehandle so that it is within an absent file system will not
result in an error. This allows such combinations as
PUTFH-GETATTR and LOOKUP-GETATTR to be used to get attribute
information, particularly location attribute information,
as discussed below.
</t>
<t>
The <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> file system attribute fs_status
can be used to interrogate the present/absent status of a
given file system.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="absent_fs_attributes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Getting Attributes for an Absent File System</name>
<t>
When a file system is absent, most attributes are not available,
but it is necessary to allow the client access to the small
set of attributes that are available, and most particularly
those that give information about the correct current locations
for this file system: fs_locations and fs_locations_info.
</t>
<section anchor="absent_getattr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>GETATTR within an Absent File System</name>
<t>
As mentioned above, an exception is made for GETATTR in that
attributes may be obtained for a filehandle within an absent
file system. This exception only applies if the attribute
mask contains at least one attribute bit that indicates the
client is interested in a result regarding an absent file
system: fs_locations, fs_locations_info, or fs_status.
If none of these attributes
is requested, GETATTR will result in an NFS4ERR_MOVED error.
</t>
<t>
When a GETATTR is done on an absent file system, the set of
supported attributes is very limited. Many attributes, including
those that are normally <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>, will not be available on an
absent file system. In addition to the attributes mentioned
above (fs_locations, fs_locations_info, fs_status), the following
attributes <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be available on absent file systems. In the
case of <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attributes, they should be available at
least to the same degree that they are available on present file systems.
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>change_policy:</dt>
<dd>
This attribute is useful for absent file systems
and can be helpful in summarizing to the client when any
of the location-related attributes change.
</dd>
<dt>fsid:</dt>
<dd>
This attribute should be provided so that the client
can determine file system boundaries, including, in
particular, the boundary between present and absent file
systems. This value must be different from any other fsid
on the current server and need have no particular relationship
to fsids on any particular destination to which the client
might be directed.
</dd>
<dt>mounted_on_fileid:</dt>
<dd>
For objects at the top of an absent
file system, this attribute needs to be available. Since
the fileid is within the present parent file
system, there should be no need to reference the absent file
system to provide this information.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
Other attributes <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be made available for absent file
systems, even when it is possible to provide them. The server
should not assume that more information is always better and
should avoid gratuitously providing additional information.
</t>
<t>
When a GETATTR operation includes a bit mask for one of the
attributes fs_locations, fs_locations_info, or fs_status, but
where the bit mask includes attributes that are not supported,
GETATTR will not return an error, but will return the mask
of the actual attributes supported with the results.
</t>
<t>
Handling of VERIFY/NVERIFY is similar to GETATTR in that if
the attribute mask does not include fs_locations, fs_locations_info,
or fs_status, the error NFS4ERR_MOVED will result. It differs in
that any appearance in the attribute mask of an attribute not
supported for an absent file system (and note that this will
include some normally <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attributes) will also cause
an NFS4ERR_MOVED result.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="absent_readdir" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>READDIR and Absent File Systems</name>
<t>
A READDIR performed when the current filehandle is within an
absent file system will result in an NFS4ERR_MOVED error,
since, unlike the case of GETATTR, no such exception is
made for READDIR.
</t>
<t>
Attributes for an absent file system may be fetched via a
READDIR for a directory in a present file system, when that
directory contains the root directories of one or more absent
file systems. In this case, the handling is as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the attribute set requested includes one of the attributes
fs_locations, fs_locations_info, or fs_status, then fetching of
attributes proceeds normally and no NFS4ERR_MOVED indication
is returned, even when the rdattr_error attribute is
requested.
</li>
<li>
If the attribute set requested does not include one of the
attributes
fs_locations, fs_locations_info, or fs_status, then if the
rdattr_error attribute is requested, each directory entry for
the root of an absent file system will report
NFS4ERR_MOVED as the value of the rdattr_error attribute.
</li>
<li>
If the attribute set requested does not include any of the
attributes fs_locations, fs_locations_info, fs_status, or
rdattr_error, then the occurrence of the root of an absent
file system within the directory will result in the
READDIR failing with an NFS4ERR_MOVED error.
</li>
<li>
The unavailability of an attribute because of a file system's
absence, even one that is ordinarily <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>, does not result
in any error indication. The set of attributes returned for
the root directory of the absent file system in that case is
simply restricted to those actually available.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Uses of File System Location Information</name>
<t>
The file system location attributes
(i.e., fs_locations and fs_locations_info),
together with the possibility of absent file systems, provide
a number of important facilities for reliable, manageable,
and scalable data access.
</t>
<t>
When a file system is present, these attributes can provide
the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The locations of alternative replicas to be used to access the
same data in the event of server failures, communications problems,
or other difficulties that make continued access to the current
replica impossible or otherwise impractical. Provisioning and
use of such alternate replicas is referred to as "replication"
and is discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-USES-repl" format="default"/> below.
</li>
<li>
The network address(es) to be used to access the current file
system instance or replicas of it. Client use of this information is
discussed in <xref target="SEC11-USES-trunk" format="default"/> below.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Under some circumstances, multiple replicas
may be used simultaneously to provide higher-performance
access to the file system in question, although the lack of state
sharing between servers may be an impediment to such use.
</t>
<t>
When a file system is present but becomes absent, clients can be
given the opportunity to have continued access to their data
using a different replica. In this case, a continued attempt
to use the data in the now-absent file system will result
in an NFS4ERR_MOVED error, and then the successor
replica or set of possible replica choices
can be fetched and used to continue access. Transfer of access
to the new replica location is referred to as
"migration" and is discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-USES-repl" format="default"/> below.
</t>
<t>
When a file system is currently absent, specification
of file system location provides a means by which file systems
located on one server can be associated with a namespace
defined by another server, thus allowing a general multi-server
namespace facility. A designation of such a remote instance, in
place of a file system not previously present, is called
a "pure referral" and is discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-USES-ref" format="default"/> below.
</t>
<t>
Because client support for attributes related to file
system location is
<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>, a server may choose to take action
to hide migration and referral events from such clients, by
acting as a proxy, for example. The server can determine
the presence of client support from the arguments of the
EXCHANGE_ID operation (see
<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>).
</t>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES-mult" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Combining Multiple Uses in a Single Attribute</name>
<t>
A file system location attribute will sometimes contain information
relating to the location of multiple replicas, which may
be used in different ways:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
File system location entries that relate to the file system instance
currently in
use provide trunking information, allowing the client to
find additional network addresses by which the instance may be
accessed.
</li>
<li>
File system location entries that provide information about
replicas to which access is to be transferred.
</li>
<li>
Other file system location entries that relate to replicas
that are available to
use in the event that access to the current replica becomes
unsatisfactory.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In order to simplify client handling and to allow the best choice
of replicas to access, the server should adhere to the following
guidelines:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
All file system location entries that relate to a
single file system instance should be adjacent.
</li>
<li>
File system location entries that relate to the instance
currently in use should appear first.
</li>
<li>
File system location entries that relate to replica(s)
to which migration
is occurring should appear before replicas that are available
for later use if the current replica should become inaccessible.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES-trunk" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Location Attributes and Trunking</name>
<t>
Trunking is the use of multiple connections between a client and
server in order to increase the speed of data transfer.
A client may determine the set of network addresses to use to
access a given file system in a number of ways:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When the name of the server is known to the client, it may use
DNS to obtain a set of network addresses to use in
accessing the server.
</li>
<li>
The client may fetch the file system location attribute for the
file system. This will
provide either the name of the server (which can be turned
into a set of network addresses using DNS) or
a set of server-trunkable location entries. Using the latter
alternative, the server can
provide addresses it regards as desirable to use
to access the file system in question. Although these entries can
contain port numbers, these port numbers are not used in determining
trunking relationships. Once the candidate addresses have been
determined and EXCHANGE_ID done to the proper server, only the value
of the so_major_id field returned by the servers in question determines
whether a trunking relationship actually exists.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When the client fetches a location attribute
for a file system, it should be noted that the client may encounter multiple entries for a number of
reasons, such that when it determines trunking information, it may
need
to bypass addresses not trunkable with one already known.
</t>
<t>
The server can provide location entries that include either
names or network addresses. It might use the latter form
because of DNS-related security concerns or because the set
of addresses
to be used might require active management by the server.
</t>
<t>
Location entries used to discover candidate addresses for
use in trunking are subject to change, as discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-USES-changes" format="default"/> below.
The client may respond to
such changes by using additional addresses once they are
verified or by ceasing to use
existing ones. The server can force the client to cease using
an address by returning NFS4ERR_MOVED when that address is used to
access a file system. This allows a transfer of client access
that is similar to migration, although the same file system instance
is accessed throughout.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES-types" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Location Attributes and Connection Type Selection</name>
<t>
Because of the need to support multiple types of connections,
clients face
the issue of determining the proper connection type to use
when establishing
a connection to a given server network address. In some cases,
this issue can be addressed through the use of the connection
"step-up" facility described in
<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>. However,
because there are cases in which that facility is not available,
the client may have to choose a connection type with no
possibility of changing it within the scope of a single connection.
</t>
<t>
The two file system location attributes differ as to the
information made available in this regard. The fs_locations attribute provides no information
to support connection type selection. As a result, clients
supporting multiple connection types would need to attempt to
establish connections using multiple connection types until
the one preferred by the client is successfully established.
</t>
<t>
The fs_locations_info attribute includes the FSLI4TF_RDMA flag,
which is convenient for a client wishing to use RDMA. When this
flag is set, it indicates that RPC-over-RDMA support is available
using the specified location entry. A client can establish a TCP
connection and then convert that connection to use RDMA by using
the step-up facility.
</t>
<t>
Irrespective of the particular attribute used, when there is
no indication that a step-up operation can be performed,
a client supporting RDMA operation can establish a new RDMA
connection, and it can be bound to
the session already established by the
TCP connection, allowing the TCP connection to be dropped
and the session converted to further use in RDMA mode, if
the server supports that.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES-repl" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Replication</name>
<t>
The fs_locations and fs_locations_info attributes provide
alternative file system locations, to be used to access data in place
of or in addition to
the current file system instance. On first access to a
file system, the client should obtain the set
of alternate locations by interrogating the fs_locations or
fs_locations_info attribute, with the latter being preferred.
</t>
<t>
In the event that the occurrence of server failures, communications
problems,
or other difficulties make continued access to the current
file system impossible or otherwise impractical, the client
can use the alternate locations as a way to get continued
access to its data.
</t>
<t>
The alternate locations may be physical replicas of the
(typically read-only) file system data supplemented by
possible asynchronous propagation of updates. Alternatively,
they may provide for the use of various forms of server
clustering in which multiple servers provide alternate
ways of accessing the same physical file system. How the
difference between replicas affects file system transitions
can be represented within the fs_locations and fs_locations_info
attributes, and how the client deals with file system transition
issues will be discussed in detail in later sections.
</t>
<t>
Although the location attributes provide some information about
the nature of the inter-replica transition, many aspects of the
semantics of possible asynchronous updates are not currently described
by the protocol, which makes it necessary for clients using replication
to switch among replicas undergoing change to familiarize themselves
with the semantics of the update approach used.
Due to this lack of specificity, many applications may find the
use of migration more appropriate because a server can propagate
all updates made before an established point in time to the new
replica as part of the migration event.
</t>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES-repl-trunk" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Trunking Presented as Replication</name>
<t>
In some situations, a file system location entry may indicate
a file system access path to be used as an alternate location,
where trunking, rather than replication, is to be used. The
situations in which this is appropriate are limited to those
in which both of the following are true:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The two file system locations (i.e., the one on which the
location attribute is obtained and the one specified in the
file system location entry) designate the same locations within
their respective single-server namespaces.
</li>
<li>
The two server network addresses (i.e., the one being used to
obtain the location attribute and the one specified in the file system
location entry) designate the same server (as indicated by the
same value of the so_major_id field of the eir_server_owner field
returned in response to EXCHANGE_ID).
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When these conditions hold, operations using both access paths are
generally trunked, although trunking may be disallowed when the
attribute fs_locations_info is used:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
When the fs_locations_info attribute shows the two entries
as not having the same simultaneous-use class, trunking is
inhibited, and the two access paths cannot be used together.
</t>
<t>
In this case, the two paths can be used serially with no
transition activity required on the part of the client, and any
transition between access paths is transparent. In transferring
access from one to the other, the client acts as if communication
were interrupted, establishing a new connection and possibly a
new session to continue access to the same file system.
</t>
</li>
<li>
Note that for two such location entries, any information within
the fs_locations_info attribute that indicates the need for special
transition activity, i.e., the appearance of the two file system
location entries with different handle, fileid, write-verifier,
change, and readdir classes, indicates a serious problem. The
client, if it allows transition to the file system instance at
all, must not treat any transition as a transparent one.
The server <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> indicate that these two entries (for the
same file system on the same server) belong to
different handle, fileid, write-verifier, change, and readdir
classes, whether or not the two entries are shown belonging to
the same simultaneous-use class.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
These situations were recognized by <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>,
even though that document made no explicit mention of trunking:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
It treated the situation that we describe as trunking as one
of simultaneous use of two distinct file system instances,
even though, in the explanatory framework now used to
describe the situation, the case is one in which a single file
system is accessed by two different trunked addresses.
</li>
<li>
It treated the situation in which two paths are to be used
serially as a special sort of "transparent transition". However,
in the descriptive framework now used to categorize transition
situations, this is considered a case of a "network endpoint
transition" (see <xref target="SEC11-trans-oview" format="default"/>).
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES-migr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Migration</name>
<t>
When a file system is present and becomes inaccessible using the
current access path, the NFSv4.1 protocol provides a means by
which clients can be given the opportunity to have continued access to their data.
This may involve using a different access path to the existing replica or
providing a path to a different replica. The new access path or
the location of the new replica is specified by a file system
location attribute. The ensuing migration of access includes
the ability to retain locks across the transition. Depending on circumstances,
this can involve:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The continued use of the existing clientid when accessing
the current replica using a new access path.
</li>
<li>
Use of lock reclaim, taking advantage of a per-fs grace period.
</li>
<li>
Use of Transparent State Migration.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Typically, a client will be
accessing the file system in question, get an NFS4ERR_MOVED
error, and then use a file system location attribute
to determine the new access path for the data. When
fs_locations_info is used, additional information will be
available that will define the nature of the client's
handling of the transition to a new server.
</t>
<t>
In most instances, servers will choose to migrate all clients using
a particular file system to a successor replica at the same time
to avoid cases in which different clients are updating different
replicas. However, migration of an individual client can be helpful
in providing load balancing, as long as the replicas in question
are such that they represent the same data as described in
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-data" format="default"/>.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
In the case in which there is no transition between replicas (i.e.,
only a change in access path), there are no special
difficulties in using of this mechanism to effect load balancing.
</li>
<li>
In the case in which the two replicas are sufficiently coordinated
as to allow a single client coherent, simultaneous access to both,
there is, in general, no obstacle to the use of migration of particular
clients to effect load balancing. Generally, such simultaneous use
involves cooperation between servers to ensure that locks granted
on two coordinated replicas cannot conflict and can remain effective
when transferred to a common replica.
</li>
<li>
In the case in which a large set of clients is accessing a
file system in a read-only fashion, it can be helpful to migrate
all clients with writable access simultaneously, while using
load balancing on the set of read-only copies, as long as the
rules in <xref target="SEC11-EFF-data" format="default"/>,
which are designed to prevent data reversion, are followed.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In other cases, the client might not have sufficient guarantees
of data similarity or coherence to function properly (e.g., the data
in the two replicas is similar but not identical), and the
possibility that different clients are updating different replicas
can exacerbate the difficulties, making the use of load balancing in
such situations a perilous enterprise.
</t>
<t>
The protocol does not specify how the file system will be moved between
servers or how updates to multiple replicas will be coordinated.
It is anticipated that a number of different
server-to-server coordination mechanisms might be used, with the
choice left to the server implementer. The NFSv4.1 protocol
specifies the method used to communicate the migration
event between client and server.
</t>
<t>
In the case of various forms of server clustering, the new location
may be another server providing access to the same physical file system. The client's
responsibilities in dealing with this transition will depend
on whether a switch between replicas has occurred and
the means the server has chosen to provide continuity of locking state.
These issues will be discussed in detail below.
</t>
<t>
Although a single successor location is typical, multiple
locations may be provided. When multiple locations are
provided, the client will typically use the first one provided.
If that is inaccessible for some reason, later ones can be used. In such
cases, the client might consider the transition to the new
replica to be a migration event, even though some of the servers
involved might not be aware of the use of the server that was
inaccessible. In such a case, a client might lose access to
locking state as a result of the access transfer.
</t>
<t>
When an alternate location is designated as the target for
migration, it must designate the same data
(with metadata being the same to the degree indicated by the
fs_locations_info attribute). Where file systems are writable,
a change made on the original file system must be visible on
all migration targets. Where a file system is not writable
but represents a read-only copy (possibly periodically
updated) of
a writable file system, similar requirements apply to the
propagation of updates. Any change visible in the original
file system must already be effected on all migration targets,
to avoid any possibility that a client, in effecting a transition to
the migration target, will see any reversion in file system state.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES-ref" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Referrals</name>
<t>
Referrals allow the server to associate a file system namespace
entry located on one server with a file system located on another server.
When this includes
the use of pure referrals, servers are provided a way of
placing a file system in a location within the namespace
essentially without respect to its physical location on a
particular server. This allows a single server or a set of servers
to present a multi-server namespace that encompasses file systems
located on a wider range of servers. Some likely uses of this facility include
establishment of site-wide or organization-wide namespaces,
with the eventual possibility of combining such
together into a truly global namespace, such as the one
provided by AFS (the Andrew File System) <xref target="AFS" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Referrals occur when a client determines, upon first referencing
a position in the current namespace, that it is part of a new
file system and that the file system is absent. When this
occurs, typically upon receiving the error NFS4ERR_MOVED, the
actual location or locations of the file system can be
determined by fetching a locations attribute.
</t>
<t>
The file system location attribute may designate a single
file system location or multiple file system locations, to
be selected based on the needs of the client. The server,
in the fs_locations_info attribute, may specify priorities to
be associated with various file system location choices.
The server may assign different priorities to different
locations as reported to individual clients, in order to
adapt to client physical location or to effect load balancing.
When both read-only and read-write file systems are present,
some of the read-only locations might not be absolutely up-to-date
(as they would have to be in the case of replication and
migration). Servers may also specify file system locations
that include client-substituted variables so that different
clients are referred to different file systems (with different
data contents) based on client attributes such as CPU
architecture.
</t>
<t>
If the fs_locations_info attribute lists multiple possible targets,
the relationships among them may be important to the client in
selecting which one to use.
The same rules specified in <xref target="SEC11-USES-migr" format="default"/>
below regarding multiple migration targets
apply to these multiple replicas as well. For example, the
client might prefer a writable target on a server that has
additional writable
replicas to which it subsequently might switch. Note that,
as distinguished from the case of replication, there is no
need to deal with the case of propagation of updates made by
the current client, since the current client has not accessed
the file system in question.
</t>
<t>
Use of multi-server namespaces is enabled by NFSv4.1 but is not
required. The use of multi-server namespaces and their scope
will depend on the applications used and system administration
preferences.
</t>
<t>
Multi-server namespaces can be established by a single
server providing a large set of pure referrals to all of the
included file systems. Alternatively, a single multi-server
namespace may be administratively segmented with separate
referral file systems (on separate servers) for each
separately administered portion of the namespace. The
top-level referral file system or any segment may use
replicated referral file systems for higher availability.
</t>
<t>
Generally, multi-server namespaces are for the most part
uniform, in that the same data made available to one client
at a given location in the namespace is made available to
all clients at that namespace location. However,
there are facilities
provided that allow different clients to be directed to
different sets of data, for reasons such as enabling
adaptation to such client
characteristics as CPU architecture. These facilities are
described in
<xref target="SEC11-fsli-item" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Note that it is possible, when providing a uniform namespace,
to provide different location entries to different clients in
order to provide each client with a copy of the data physically
closest to it or otherwise optimize access (e.g., provide load
balancing).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-USES-changes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Changes in a File System Location Attribute</name>
<t>
Although clients will typically fetch a file system location attribute
when first accessing a file system and when NFS4ERR_MOVED
is returned, a client can choose to fetch the attribute
periodically, in which case, the value fetched may change over time.
</t>
<t>
For clients not prepared to access multiple replicas simultaneously (see
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-simul" format="default"/>),
the handling of the various cases of location change are as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Changes in the list of replicas or in the network addresses
associated with replicas do not require immediate action.
The client will typically update its list of replicas to
reflect the new information.
</li>
<li>
Additions to the list of network addresses for the
current file system instance need not be acted
on promptly. However, to prepare for a subsequent
migration event, the client can choose
to take note of the new address and then use it
whenever it needs to switch access to a new replica.
</li>
<li>
Deletions from the list of network addresses for the
current file system instance do not require the client to immediately
cease use of existing access paths, although new connections
are not to be established on addresses that have been deleted.
However, clients can choose to act on such deletions
by preparing for an eventual shift in access, which
becomes unavoidable as soon as the server returns
NFS4ERR_MOVED to indicate that a particular network access path is
not usable to access the current file system.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
For clients that are prepared to access several replicas simultaneously,
the following additional cases need to be addressed. As in
the cases discussed above, changes in the set of replicas
need not be acted upon promptly, although the client has
the option of adjusting its access even in the absence of
difficulties that would lead to the selection of a new replica.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When a new replica is added, which may be accessed
simultaneously with one currently in use, the client is free
to use the new replica immediately.
</li>
<li>
When a replica currently in use is deleted from the list, the
client need not cease using it immediately. However, since
the server may subsequently force such use to cease (by
returning NFS4ERR_MOVED), clients might decide to limit the
need for later state transfer. For example, new opens might
be done on other replicas, rather than on one not present in
the list.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-TRUNK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Trunking without File System Location Information</name>
<t>
In situations in which a file system is accessed using two
server-trunkable addresses (as indicated by the same value of the
so_major_id field of the eir_server_owner field returned in
response to EXCHANGE_ID), trunked access is allowed even though
there might not be any location entries specifically indicating
the use of trunking for that file system.
</t>
<t>
This situation was recognized by <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>, although
that document made no explicit mention of trunking and treated the
situation as one of simultaneous use of two distinct file system
instances. In the explanatory framework now used to
describe the situation, the case is one in which a single file
system is accessed by two different trunked addresses.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-users" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Users and Groups in a Multi-Server Namespace</name>
<t>
As in the case of a single-server environment (see
<xref target="owner_owner_group" format="default"/>),
when an owner or group name of the form "id@domain" is assigned to
a file, there is an implicit promise to return that same string when
the corresponding attribute is interrogated subsequently. In the
case of a multi-server namespace, that same promise applies even if
server boundaries have been crossed. Similarly, when the owner
attribute of a file is derived from the security principal that created
the file, that attribute should have the same value even if the
interrogation occurs on a different server from the file creation.
</t>
<t>
Similarly, the set of security principals recognized by all the
participating servers needs to be the same, with each such principal
having the same credentials, regardless of the particular server
being accessed.
</t>
<t>
In order to meet these requirements, those setting up multi-server
namespaces will need to limit the servers included so that:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
In all cases in which more than a single domain is supported,
the requirements stated in RFC 8000 <xref target="RFC8000" format="default"/>
are to be respected.
</li>
<li>
All servers support a common set of domains that includes all of
the domains clients use and expect to see returned as the domain
portion of an owner or group in the form "id@domain". Note that,
although this set most often consists of a single domain, it is
possible for multiple domains to be supported.
</li>
<li>
All servers, for each domain that they support, accept the same set
of user and group ids as valid.
</li>
<li>
All servers recognize the same set of security principals. For each
principal, the same credential is required, independent of the
server being accessed. In addition, the group membership for each such
principal is to be the same, independent of the server accessed.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that there is no requirement in general that the users
corresponding to particular security principals have the same local
representation on each server, even though it is most often the case that this is so.
</t>
<t>
When AUTH_SYS is used, the following additional requirements must be met:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Only a single NFSv4 domain can be supported through the use of AUTH_SYS.
</li>
<li>
The "local" representation of all owners and groups must be the same
on all servers. The word "local" is used here since that is the
way that numeric user and group ids are described in
<xref target="owner_owner_group" format="default"/>. However,
when AUTH_SYS or stringified numeric owners or
groups are used, these identifiers are not truly local, since they
are known to the clients as well as to the server.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Similarly, when stringified numeric user and group ids are used, the
"local" representation of all owners and groups must be the same on
all servers, even when AUTH_SYS is not used.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-csr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Additional Client-Side Considerations</name>
<t>
When clients make use of servers that implement referrals,
replication, and
migration, care should be taken that a user who mounts a given
file system that includes a referral or a relocated file system
continues to see a coherent picture of that user-side file system
despite the fact that it contains a number of server-side
file systems that may be on different servers.
</t>
<t>
One important issue is upward navigation from the root of a
server-side file system to its parent (specified as ".." in UNIX),
in the case in which it transitions to that file system as a
result of referral, migration, or a transition as a result of
replication. When the client is at such a point, and it needs to ascend to
the parent, it must go back to the parent as seen within the
multi-server namespace rather than sending a LOOKUPP operation to the
server, which would result in the parent within that server's
single-server namespace. In order to do this, the client
needs to remember the filehandles that represent such
file system roots and use these instead of sending a
LOOKUPP operation to the current server. This will allow the client
to present to applications a consistent namespace, where
upward navigation and downward navigation are consistent.
</t>
<t>
Another issue concerns refresh of referral locations. When
referrals are used extensively, they may change as server
configurations change. It is expected that clients will cache
information related to traversing referrals so that future
client-side requests are resolved locally without server
communication.
This is usually rooted in client-side name look up caching. Clients
should periodically purge this data for referral points in order to
detect changes in location information. When the change_policy
attribute changes for directories that hold referral entries
or for the referral entries themselves, clients should consider
any associated
cached referral information to be out of date.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-trans-oview" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Overview of File Access Transitions</name>
<t>
File access transitions are of two types:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Those that involve a transition from accessing the current
replica to another one in connection with either replication or migration.
How these are dealt with is discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-EFF" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
Those in which access to the current file system instance is retained, while
the network path used to access that instance is changed. This case is
discussed in <xref target="SEC11-nwa" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-nwa" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Effecting Network Endpoint Transitions</name>
<t>
The endpoints used to access a particular file system instance
may change in a number of ways, as listed below. In each of these
cases, the same fsid, client IDs, filehandles, and stateids are
used to continue access, with a continuity of lock state. In
many cases, the same sessions can also be used.
</t>
<t>
The appropriate action depends on the set of replacement addresses
that are available for use
(i.e., server endpoints that are server-trunkable with one previously
being used).
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When use of a particular address is to cease, and there is
also another address
currently in use that is server-trunkable with it, requests
that would have been issued on the address whose use is to be
discontinued can be issued on the remaining address(es). When an
address is server-trunkable but not session-trunkable with the
address whose use is to be discontinued, the request might need
to be modified to reflect the fact that a different session will
be used.
</li>
<li>
When use of a particular connection is to cease, as indicated
by receiving NFS4ERR_MOVED when using that connection, but
that address is
still indicated as accessible according to the appropriate
file system location
entries, it is likely that requests can be issued on a new
connection of a different connection type once that connection
is established.
Since any two non-port-specific server endpoints that share a
network address are inherently session-trunkable, the client
can use BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION to access the existing session
with the new connection.
</li>
<li>
When there are no potential replacement addresses in use, but there
are valid addresses session-trunkable with the one whose use is
to be discontinued, the client can use BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION
to access the existing session using the new address. Although
the target session will generally be accessible, there may be
rare situations in which that session is no longer accessible
when an attempt is made to bind the new connection to it. In this
case, the client can create a new session to enable continued
access to the existing instance using the new connection,
providing for the use of existing filehandles, stateids, and
client ids while supplying continuity of locking state.
</li>
<li>
When there is no potential replacement address in use, and there
are no valid addresses session-trunkable with the one whose use is
to be discontinued, other server-trunkable addresses may be
used to provide continued access. Although the use of CREATE_SESSION
is available to provide continued access to the existing instance,
servers have the option of providing continued access to the
existing session through the new network access path in a fashion
similar to that provided by session migration (see
<xref target="SEC11-trans-locking" format="default"/>).
To take advantage of this
possibility, clients can perform an initial BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
as in the previous case, and use CREATE_SESSION only if that fails.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Effecting File System Transitions</name>
<t>
There are a range of situations in which there is a change to be
effected in the set of replicas used to access a particular
file system. Some of these may involve an expansion or
contraction of the set of replicas used as discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-simul" format="default"/> below.
</t>
<t>
For reasons explained in that section, most transitions will involve
a transition from a single replica to a corresponding replacement
replica. When effecting replica transition, some types of
sharing between the replicas may affect handling of the
transition as described in
Sections <xref target="SEC11-EFF-fh" format="counter"/>
through <xref target="SEC11-EFF-data" format="counter"/> below.
The attribute fs_locations_info provides helpful information
to allow the client to determine the degree of inter-replica
sharing.
</t>
<t>
With regard to some types of state, the degree of continuity
across the transition depends on the occasion prompting the
transition, with transitions initiated by the servers
(i.e., migration) offering much more scope for a nondisruptive
transition than cases in which the client on its own
shifts its access to another replica (i.e., replication).
This issue potentially applies to locking state and to session
state, which are dealt with below as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
An introduction to the possible means of providing continuity in
these areas appears in <xref target="SEC11-EFF-lock" format="default"/> below.
</li>
<li>
Transparent State Migration is introduced in
<xref target="SEC11-trans-locking" format="default"/>.
The possible transfer of
session state is addressed there as well.
</li>
<li>
The client handling of transitions, including determining how to
deal with the various means that the server might take to
supply effective continuity of locking state, is discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-trans-client" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
The source and destination servers' responsibilities
in effecting Transparent State Migration
of locking and session state are discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-trans-server" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-simul" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Transitions and Simultaneous Access</name>
<t>
The fs_locations_info attribute (described in
<xref target="SEC11-li-new" format="default"/>)
may indicate that two replicas
may be used simultaneously, although some situations in which such
simultaneous access is permitted are more appropriately described
as instances of trunking (see <xref target="SEC11-USES-repl-trunk" format="default"/>).
Although situations
in which multiple replicas may be accessed simultaneously are
somewhat similar to those in which a single replica is
accessed by multiple network addresses, there are important
differences since locking state is not shared among multiple
replicas.
</t>
<t>
Because of this difference in state handling, many clients will
not have the ability to take advantage of the fact that such
replicas represent the same data. Such clients will not be
prepared to use multiple replicas simultaneously but will access
each file system using only a single replica, although the
replica selected might make multiple server-trunkable addresses
available.
</t>
<t>
Clients who are prepared to use multiple replicas simultaneously
can divide opens among replicas however they choose. Once that
choice is made, any subsequent transitions will treat the set of locking
state associated with each replica as a single entity.
</t>
<t>
For example, if one of the replicas become unavailable, access will be
transferred to a different replica, which is also capable of
simultaneous access with the one still in use.
</t>
<t>
When there is no such replica, the transition may be to the
replica already in use. At this point, the client has a
choice between merging the locking state for the two replicas
under the aegis of the sole replica in use or treating these
separately until another replica capable of simultaneous
access presents itself.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-fh" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Filehandles and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
There are a number of ways in which filehandles can be handled
across a file system transition. These can be divided into
two broad classes depending upon whether the two file systems
across which the transition happens share sufficient state to
effect some sort of continuity of file system handling.
</t>
<t>
When there is no such cooperation in filehandle assignment,
the two file systems are reported as being in different
handle classes. In this case,
all filehandles are assumed to expire as part of the
file system transition. Note that this behavior does not
depend on the fh_expire_type attribute and supersedes
the specification
of the FH4_VOL_MIGRATION bit, which only affects behavior when
fs_locations_info is not available.
</t>
<t>
When there is cooperation in filehandle assignment,
the two file systems are reported as being in the same
handle classes. In this case,
persistent filehandles remain valid after the file system
transition, while volatile filehandles (excluding those
that are only volatile due to the FH4_VOL_MIGRATION bit) are
subject to expiration on the target server.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-fileid" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Fileids and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
In NFSv4.0, the issue of continuity of fileids in the event
of a file system transition was not addressed. The general
expectation had been that in situations in
which the two file system instances are created by a single vendor
using some sort of file system image copy, fileids would be
consistent across the transition, while in the analogous
multi-vendor transitions they would not. This poses difficulties,
especially for the client without special knowledge
of the transition mechanisms adopted by the server. Note
that although fileid is not a <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attribute, many servers
support fileids and many clients provide APIs that depend on fileids.
</t>
<t>
It is important to note that while clients themselves may have no
trouble with a fileid changing as a result of a file system
transition event, applications do typically have access to the
fileid (e.g., via stat). The result is that an
application may work perfectly well if there is no file system
instance transition or if any such transition is among instances
created by a single vendor, yet be unable to deal with the
situation in which a multi-vendor transition occurs at the wrong
time.
</t>
<t>
Providing the same fileids in a multi-vendor (multiple server
vendors) environment has generally been held to be quite difficult.
While there is work to be done, it needs to be pointed out that
this difficulty is partly self-imposed. Servers have typically
identified fileid with inode number, i.e. with a quantity used to
find the file in question. This identification poses special
difficulties for migration of a file system between vendors
where assigning
the same index to a given file may not be possible. Note here that
a fileid is not required to be useful to find the file in
question, only that it is unique within the given file system. Servers
prepared to accept a fileid as a single piece of metadata and store
it apart from the value used to index the file information can
relatively easily maintain a fileid value across a migration event,
allowing a truly transparent migration event.
</t>
<t>
In any case, where servers can provide continuity of fileids, they
should, and the client should be able to find out that such
continuity is available and take appropriate action. Information
about the continuity (or lack thereof) of fileids across a file
system transition is represented by specifying whether the file systems
in question are of the same fileid class.
</t>
<t>
Note that when consistent fileids do not exist across a
transition (either because there is no continuity of fileids
or because fileid is not a supported attribute on one of
instances involved), and there are
no reliable filehandles across a transition event (either because
there is no filehandle continuity or because the filehandles are
volatile), the client is in a position where it cannot verify
that files it was accessing before the transition are the
same objects. It is forced to assume that no object has been
renamed, and, unless there are guarantees that provide this
(e.g., the file system is read-only), problems for applications
may occur. Therefore, use of such configurations should be
limited to situations where the problems that this may cause
can be tolerated.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-fsid" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Fsids and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
Since fsids are generally only unique on a per-server basis,
it is likely that they will change during a file system
transition.
Clients should not make the fsids received
from the server visible to applications since they may not be
globally unique, and because they may change during a file
system transition event. Applications are best served if they
are isolated from such transitions to the extent possible.
</t>
<t>
Although normally a single source file system will transition
to a single target file system, there is a provision for splitting
a single source file system into multiple target file systems, by
specifying the FSLI4F_MULTI_FS flag.
</t>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-fsid-split" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Splitting</name>
<t>
When a file system transition is made and the fs_locations_info
indicates that the file system in question might be split into
multiple file systems (via the FSLI4F_MULTI_FS flag), the client
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> do GETATTRs to determine the fsid attribute on all known
objects within the file system undergoing transition to determine
the new file system boundaries.
</t>
<t>
Clients might choose to
maintain the fsids passed to existing applications
by mapping all of the fsids for the descendant file systems to
the common fsid used for the original file system.
</t>
<t>
Splitting a file system can be done on a transition between
file systems of the same fileid
class, since the fact that fileids are unique within the
source file system ensure they will be unique in each of the
target file systems.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-change" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The Change Attribute and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
Since the change attribute is defined as a server-specific one,
change attributes fetched from one server are normally presumed to
be invalid on another server. Such a presumption is troublesome
since it would invalidate all cached change attributes, requiring
refetching. Even more disruptive, the absence of any assured
continuity for the change attribute means that even if the same
value is retrieved on refetch, no conclusions can be drawn as to whether
the object in question has changed. The identical change
attribute could be merely an artifact of a modified file with
a different change attribute construction algorithm, with that
new algorithm just happening to result in an identical change
value.
</t>
<t>
When the two file systems have consistent change attribute formats,
and this fact is communicated to the client by reporting
in the same change class, the
client may assume a continuity of change attribute construction
and handle this situation just as it would be handled without
any file system transition.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-wv" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Write Verifiers and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
In a file system transition, the two file systems might be
cooperating in the handling of unstably written data.
Clients can determine if this is the
case by seeing if the two file systems belong to the same
write-verifier class. When this is the case, write
verifiers returned
from one system may be compared to those returned by the
other and superfluous writes can be avoided.
</t>
<t>
When two file systems belong to different
write-verifier classes, any verifier
generated by one must not be compared to one provided by the
other. Instead, the two verifiers should be treated as not
equal even when the values are identical.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-rdc" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>READDIR Cookies and Verifiers and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
In a file system transition, the two file systems might be
consistent in their handling of READDIR cookies and verifiers.
Clients can determine if this is the
case by seeing if the two file systems belong to the same
readdir class. When this is the case, readdir class, READDIR
cookies, and verifiers
from one system will be recognized by the other, and
READDIR operations started on one server can be validly
continued on the other simply by presenting the
cookie and verifier returned by a READDIR operation done
on the first file system to the second.
</t>
<t>
When two file systems belong to different
readdir classes, any READDIR cookie and verifier
generated by one is not valid on the second and must not
be presented to that server by the client. The client
should act as if the verifier were rejected.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-data" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Data and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
When multiple replicas exist and are used simultaneously or in
succession by a client, applications using them will normally expect
that they contain either the same data or data that is consistent with
the normal sorts of changes that are made by other clients
updating the data of the file system
(with metadata being the same to the degree indicated by the
fs_locations_info attribute). However, when multiple file systems are
presented as replicas of one another, the precise relationship
between the data of one and the data of another is not, as a
general matter, specified by the NFSv4.1 protocol. It is quite
possible to present as replicas file systems where the data of
those file systems is sufficiently different that some applications
have problems dealing with the transition between replicas. The
namespace will typically be constructed so that applications can
choose an appropriate level of support, so that in one position in
the namespace, a varied set of replicas might be listed, while in
another, only those that are up-to-date would be considered replicas.
The protocol does define three special cases of the relationship among
replicas to be specified by the server and relied upon by clients:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When multiple replicas exist and are used simultaneously
by a client (see the FSLIB4_CLSIMUL definition within
fs_locations_info), they must designate the same
data. Where file systems are writable, a change made on
one instance must be visible on all instances at the same
time, regardless of whether the interrogated instance is the
one on which the modification was done.
This allows a client to use these replicas
simultaneously without any special adaptation to the fact
that there are multiple replicas, beyond adapting to the fact
that locks obtained on one replica are maintained separately
(i.e., under a different client ID).
In this case, locks (whether share reservations or
byte-range locks) and delegations obtained on one
replica are immediately reflected on all replicas, in the
sense that access from all other servers is prevented
regardless of the replica used. However, because the servers are
not required to treat two associated client IDs as
representing the same client, it is best to
access each file using only a single client ID.
</li>
<li>
When one replica is designated as the successor instance to another
existing instance after the return of NFS4ERR_MOVED (i.e., the case of
migration), the client may depend on the fact that all changes
written to stable storage on the original instance
are written to stable storage of the successor (uncommitted
writes are dealt with in <xref target="SEC11-EFF-wv" format="default"/> above).
</li>
<li>
Where a file system is not writable but represents a read-only
copy (possibly periodically updated) of a writable file system,
clients have similar requirements with regard to the propagation
of updates. They may need a guarantee that any change visible on
the original file system instance must be immediately visible on
any replica before the client transitions access to that replica,
in order to avoid any possibility that a client, in effecting a transition to a
replica, will see any reversion in file system state.
The specific means of this guarantee varies based on the value of
the fss_type field that is reported as part of the fs_status attribute
(see <xref target="fs_status" format="default"/>).
Since these file systems are presumed to be unsuitable for simultaneous use,
there is no specification of how locking is handled; in general, locks obtained on one file
system will be separate from those on others.
Since these are expected to be read-only file systems,
this is not likely to pose an issue for clients or applications.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When none of these special situations applies, there is no basis
within the protocol for the client to make assumptions about the
contents of a replica file system or its relationship to previous
file system instances. Thus, switching between nominally
identical read-write file systems would not be possible because either the
client does not use the fs_locations_info attribute, or the server does not support it.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-lock" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Lock State and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
While accessing a file system, clients obtain locks enforced
by the server, which may prevent actions by other clients
that are inconsistent with those locks.
</t>
<t>
When access is transferred between replicas, clients need to
be assured that the actions disallowed by holding these locks
cannot have occurred during the transition. This can be ensured
by the methods below. Unless at least one of these is implemented,
clients will not be assured of continuity of lock
possession across a migration event:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Providing the client an opportunity to re-obtain his locks via a per-fs grace
period on the destination server, denying all clients using the
destination file system the
opportunity to obtain new locks that conflict with those held
by the transferred client as long as that client
has not completed its per-fs grace period. Because the lock reclaim
mechanism was originally defined to support server reboot, it
implicitly assumes that filehandles will, upon reclaim,
be the same as those at open. In the case of migration, this
requires that source and destination servers use the same
filehandles, as evidenced by using the same server scope
(see <xref target="Server_Scope" format="default"/>)
or by showing this agreement using fs_locations_info
(see <xref target="SEC11-EFF-fh" format="default"/> above).
</t>
<t>
Note that such a grace period can be implemented without
interfering with the ability of non-transferred clients to
obtain new locks while it is going on. As long as the destination
server is aware of the transferred locks, it can distinguish requests
to obtain new locks that contrast with existing locks
from those that do not, allowing it to treat such client requests
without reference to the ongoing grace period.
</t>
</li>
<li>
Locking state can be transferred as part of the transition
by providing Transparent State Migration as
described in <xref target="SEC11-trans-locking" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Of these, Transparent State Migration provides the smoother
experience for clients in that there is no need to go through a
reclaim process before new locks can be obtained; however, it requires
a greater degree of inter-server coordination. In general, the
servers taking part in migration are free to provide either
facility. However, when the filehandles can differ across the
migration event, Transparent State Migration is the only
available means of providing the needed functionality.
</t>
<t>
It should be noted that these two methods are not mutually
exclusive and that a server might well provide both. In
particular, if there is some circumstance preventing a
specific lock from being transferred transparently,
the destination server can allow it to be reclaimed by
implementing a per-fs grace period for the migrated file system.
</t>
<section anchor="SEC11-EFF-lock-sc" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Consideration Related to Reclaiming Lock State after File System Transitions</name>
<t>
Although it is possible for a client reclaiming state to misrepresent
its state in the same fashion as described in
<xref target="reclaim_security_considerations" format="default"/>, most
implementations providing for such reclamation in the case of
file system transitions
will have the ability to detect such misrepresentations. This limits
the ability of unauthenticated clients to execute denial-of-service
attacks in these circumstances. Nevertheless, the rules stated in
<xref target="reclaim_security_considerations" format="default"/> regarding principal
verification for reclaim requests apply in this situation as well.
</t>
<t>
Typically, implementations that support file system transitions
will have extensive information about the locks
to be transferred. This is because of the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Since failure is not involved, there is no need to store locking
information in persistent storage.
</li>
<li>
There is no need, as there is in the failure case, to update
multiple repositories containing locking state to keep them in
sync. Instead, there is a one-time communication of locking
state from the source to the destination server.
</li>
<li>
Providing this information avoids potential interference with
existing clients using the destination file system by denying
them the ability to obtain new locks during the grace period.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When such detailed locking information, not necessarily including
the associated stateids, is available:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
It is possible to detect reclaim requests that attempt to
reclaim locks that did not exist before the transfer, rejecting
them with NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD (<xref target="err_RECLAIM_BAD" format="default"/>).
</li>
<li>
It is possible when dealing with non-reclaim requests, to determine
whether they conflict with existing locks, eliminating the need
to return NFS4ERR_GRACE (<xref target="err_GRACE" format="default"/>) on
non-reclaim requests.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
It is possible for implementations of grace periods in connection
with file system transitions not to have detailed locking
information available at the destination server, in which case,
the security situation is exactly as described in
<xref target="reclaim_security_considerations" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="transferred_lease" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Leases and File System Transitions</name>
<t>
In the case of lease renewal, the client may not be
submitting requests for a file system that has been transferred
to another server. This can occur
because of the lease renewal mechanism. The
client renews the lease associated with all file systems
when submitting
a request on an associated session, regardless of the
specific file system being referenced.
</t>
<t>
In order for the client to schedule renewal of its lease
where there is locking state that may have been relocated
to the new server, the client
must find out about lease relocation before that lease
expire. To accomplish this, the SEQUENCE operation will
return the status bit SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED
if responsibility for any of the renewed locking state
has been transferred to a new server. This
will continue until the client receives an
NFS4ERR_MOVED error for each of the file systems for which
there has been locking state relocation.
</t>
<t>
When a client receives an SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED indication from
a server, for each file system of the server for which the client
has locking state, the client should perform an operation.
For simplicity, the client may choose to reference
all file systems, but what is important
is that it must reference all file systems for which there was
locking state where that state has moved. Once the client
receives an NFS4ERR_MOVED error for each such file system,
the server will clear the SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED indication.
The client can terminate the process of checking file systems
once this indication is cleared (but only if the client
has received a reply for all outstanding SEQUENCE requests
on all sessions it has with the server), since there are no others
for which locking state has moved.
</t>
<t>
A client may use GETATTR of the fs_status
(or fs_locations_info) attribute on all of the file systems
to get absence indications in a single (or a few) request(s),
since absent file systems will not cause an error in this
context. However, it still must do an operation that
receives NFS4ERR_MOVED on each file system, in order to clear
the SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED indication.
</t>
<t>
Once the set of file systems with transferred locking state
has been determined, the client can follow the normal process
to obtain the new server information (through the
fs_locations and fs_locations_info attributes) and perform renewal
of that lease on the new server, unless information in the
fs_locations_info attribute shows that no state could have
been transferred. If the server has not
had state transferred to it transparently, the client
will receive NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID
from the new server,
as described above, and the client can then reclaim
locks
as is done in the event of server failure.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="transition_lease_time" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Transitions and the Lease_time Attribute</name>
<t>
In order that the client may appropriately manage its lease
in the case of a file system transition, the destination server must
establish proper values for the lease_time attribute.
</t>
<t>
When state is transferred transparently, that state
should include the correct value of the lease_time
attribute. The lease_time attribute on the destination
server must never be less than that on the source, since
this would result in premature expiration of a lease
granted by the source server. Upon transitions in which
state is transferred transparently, the client is under
no obligation to refetch the lease_time attribute and
may continue to use the value
previously fetched (on the source server).
</t>
<t>
If state has not been transferred transparently, either
because the associated servers are shown as having different
eir_server_scope strings or because the client ID
is rejected when presented to the new server,
the client should fetch the value
of lease_time on the new (i.e., destination) server, and
use it for subsequent locking requests. However, the server
must respect a grace
period of at least as long as the lease_time on the source
server, in order to ensure that clients have ample time to
reclaim their lock before potentially conflicting
non-reclaimed locks are granted.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-trans-locking" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Transferring State upon Migration</name>
<t>
When the transition is a result of a server-initiated decision
to transition access, and the source and destination servers have
implemented appropriate cooperation, it is possible to do the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Transfer locking state from the source to the destination
server in a fashion similar to that provided by Transparent State
Migration in NFSv4.0, as described in <xref target="RFC7931" format="default"/>.
Server responsibilities are described in <xref target="SEC11-XS-lock" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
Transfer session state from the source to the destination
server. Server responsibilities in effecting such a
transfer are described in <xref target="SEC11-XS-session" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The means by which the client determines which of these transfer
events has occurred are described in
<xref target="SEC11-trans-client" format="default"/>.
</t>
<section anchor="V41p-pnfs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Transparent State Migration and pNFS</name>
<t>
When pNFS is involved, the protocol is capable of supporting:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Migration of the Metadata Server (MDS), leaving the Data
Servers (DSs) in place.
</li>
<li>
Migration of the file system as a whole, including the MDS
and associated DSs.
</li>
<li>
Replacement of one DS by another.
</li>
<li>
Migration of a pNFS file system to one in which pNFS is not used.
</li>
<li>
Migration of a file system not using pNFS to one in which
layouts are available.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that migration, per se, is only involved in the transfer of
the MDS function. Although the servicing of a layout may be
transferred from one data server to another, this not done using
the file system location attributes. The MDS can effect such
transfers by recalling or revoking existing layouts and granting new
ones on a different data server.
</t>
<t>
Migration of the MDS function is directly supported by
Transparent State Migration. Layout state will normally be
transparently transferred, just as other state is.
As a result, Transparent State Migration provides a framework in
which, given appropriate inter-MDS data transfer, one MDS can
be substituted for another.
</t>
<t>
Migration of the file system function as a whole can be accomplished by
recalling all layouts as part of the initial phase of the
migration process. As a result, I/O will be done through the
MDS during the migration process, and new layouts can be granted
once the client is interacting with the new MDS. An MDS can
also effect this sort of transition by revoking all layouts
as part of Transparent State Migration, as long as the client is
notified about the loss of locking state.
</t>
<t>
In order to allow migration to a file system on which pNFS is
not supported, clients need to be prepared for a situation in
which layouts are not available or supported on the destination file
system and so direct I/O requests to the destination
server, rather than depending on layouts being available.
</t>
<t>
Replacement of one DS by another is not addressed by migration as
such but can be effected by an MDS recalling layouts for the DS
to be replaced and issuing new ones to be served by the
successor DS.
</t>
<t>
Migration may transfer a file system from a server that does
not support pNFS to one that does. In order to properly adapt
to this situation, clients that support pNFS, but function
adequately in its absence, should check for pNFS support when
a file system is migrated and be prepared to use pNFS when
support is available on the destination.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-trans-client" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Responsibilities When Access Is Transitioned</name>
<t>
For a client to respond to an access transition, it must become
aware of it. The ways in which this can happen are discussed
in <xref target="V41c-clrecov" format="default"/>, which discusses indications
that a specific file system access path has transitioned as well as
situations in which additional activity is necessary to
determine the set of file systems that have been migrated.
<xref target="V41c-migrdisc" format="default"/> goes on to complete the discussion
of how the set of migrated file systems might be determined.
Sections <xref target="V41c-omoved" format="counter"/> through
<xref target="V41c-ssnwas" format="counter"/>
discuss how the client should deal with
each transition it becomes aware of, either directly or as a
result of migration discovery.
</t>
<t>
The following terms are used to describe client activities:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
"Transition recovery" refers to the process of restoring access
to a file system on which NFS4ERR_MOVED was received.
</li>
<li>
"Migration recovery" refers to that subset of transition recovery
that applies when the file system has migrated to a different
replica.
</li>
<li>
"Migration discovery" refers to the process of determining which
file system(s) have been migrated. It is necessary to avoid a situation in
which leases could expire when a file system is not accessed for
a long period of time, since a client unaware of the migration
might be referencing an unmigrated file system and not renewing
the lease associated with the migrated file system.
</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="V41c-clrecov" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Transition Notifications</name>
<t>
When there is a change in the network access
path that a client is to use to access a file system, there
are a number of related status indications with which clients
need to deal:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
If an attempt is made to use or return a filehandle
within a file system that is no longer accessible at the
address previously used to access it, the
error NFS4ERR_MOVED is returned.
</t>
<t>
Exceptions are made to allow such filehandles to be used
when interrogating a file system location attribute.
This enables a client to determine
a new replica's location or a new network access path.
</t>
<t>
This condition continues on subsequent attempts to access
the file system in question. The only way the client
can avoid the error is to cease accessing the file system in
question at its old server location and access it instead
using a different address at which it is now available.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Whenever a client sends a SEQUENCE operation to a server that
generated state held on that client and associated with a
file system no longer accessible on that server, the response will contain
the status bit SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED, indicating that there has
been a lease migration.
</t>
<t>
This condition continues until the client acknowledges
the notification by fetching a file system location attribute for the
file system whose network access path is being changed.
When there are multiple such file systems, a location attribute
for each such file system needs to be fetched. The location
attribute for all migrated file systems needs to be fetched
in order to clear the condition. Even after the condition is cleared, the
client needs to respond by using the location information
to access the file system at its new location
to ensure that leases are not needlessly expired.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Unlike NFSv4.0, in which the corresponding
conditions are both errors and thus mutually exclusive,
in NFSv4.1 the client can,
and often will, receive both indications on the same
request. As a result, implementations need to address the
question of how to coordinate
the necessary recovery actions when both indications
arrive in the response to the same request. It should be noted
that when processing an NFSv4 COMPOUND, the server
will normally decide
whether SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED is to be set before
it determines which file system will be referenced or whether
NFS4ERR_MOVED is to be returned.
</t>
<t>
Since these indications are not mutually exclusive in NFSv4.1,
the following combinations are possible results when a COMPOUND
is issued:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
The COMPOUND status
is NFS4ERR_MOVED, and SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED is asserted.
</t>
<t>
In this case, transition recovery is required. While it is
possible that migration discovery is needed in addition, it
is likely that only the accessed file system has transitioned.
In any case, because addressing NFS4ERR_MOVED is necessary to
allow the rejected requests to be processed on the target,
dealing with it will typically have priority over
migration discovery.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
The COMPOUND status
is NFS4ERR_MOVED, and SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED is clear.
</t>
<t>
In this case, transition recovery is also required. It is
clear that migration discovery is not needed to find
file systems that have been migrated other than the one
returning NFS4ERR_MOVED. Cases in which this
result can arise include a referral or a migration for which
there is no associated locking state. This can also arise in
cases in which an access path transition
other than migration occurs within the same server. In such a
case, there is no need to set SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED, since
the lease remains associated with the current server even though
the access path has changed.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
The COMPOUND status
is not NFS4ERR_MOVED, and SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED is asserted.
</t>
<t>
In this case, no transition recovery activity is required on
the file system(s) accessed by the request. However, to prevent avoidable
lease expiration, migration discovery needs to be done.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
The COMPOUND status
is not NFS4ERR_MOVED, and SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED is clear.
</t>
<t>
In this case, neither transition-related activity nor migration
discovery is required.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that the specified actions only need to be taken if they are
not already going on. For example, when NFS4ERR_MOVED is received
while accessing a file system for which transition recovery is already occurring, the client
merely waits for that recovery to be completed, while the receipt of
the SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED indication only
needs to initiate migration discovery for a server if such
discovery is not already underway for that server.
</t>
<t>
The fact that a lease-migrated condition does not result in
an error in NFSv4.1 has a number of important consequences.
In addition to the fact that the two
indications are not mutually exclusive, as discussed above, there are number of
issues that are important in considering implementation of
migration discovery, as discussed in
<xref target="V41c-migrdisc" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Because SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED is not an error condition, it is possible
for file systems whose access paths have not changed to be
successfully accessed on a given server even though recovery
is necessary for other file systems on the same server. As
a result, access can take place while:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The migration discovery process is happening for that server.
</li>
<li>
The transition recovery process is happening for other
file systems connected to that server.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="V41c-migrdisc" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Performing Migration Discovery</name>
<t>
Migration discovery can be performed in the same context as
transition recovery, allowing recovery for each migrated file
system to be invoked as it is discovered. Alternatively, it may
be done in a separate migration discovery thread, allowing
migration discovery to be done in parallel with
one or more instances of transition recovery.
</t>
<t>
In either case, because the lease-migrated indication
does not result in an error, other access to file systems on the
server can proceed normally, with the possibility that further
such indications will be received, raising the issue of how
such indications are to be dealt with. In general:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
No action needs to be taken for such indications received by any
threads performing migration discovery, since continuation of that
work will address the issue.
</li>
<li>
In other cases in which migration discovery is currently being performed,
nothing further needs to be done to respond to such lease
migration indications, as long as one can be certain that the migration
discovery process would deal with those indications. See below for details.
</li>
<li>
For such indications received in all other contexts, the
appropriate response is to initiate or otherwise provide for the
execution of migration discovery for file systems
associated with the server IP address returning the indication.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
This leaves a potential difficulty in situations in which the
migration discovery process is near to completion but is still
operating. One should not ignore a SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED indication if
the migration discovery process is not able to respond to
the discovery of additional migrating file
systems without additional aid. A further complexity relevant in
addressing such situations is that a lease-migrated indication may
reflect the server's state at the time the SEQUENCE operation
was processed, which may be different from that in effect at the
time the response is received. Because new migration events
may occur at any time, and because a SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED indication may reflect
the situation in effect a considerable time before the indication
is received, special care needs to be taken to ensure that SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED
indications are not inappropriately ignored.
</t>
<t>
A useful approach to this issue involves the use of separate
externally-visible migration discovery states for each server.
Separate values could represent the various possible states for
the migration discovery process for a server:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Non-operation, in which migration discovery is not being
performed.
</li>
<li>
Normal operation, in which there is an ongoing scan for
migrated file systems.
</li>
<li>
Completion/verification of migration discovery processing,
in which the possible completion of migration discovery
processing needs to be verified.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Given that framework, migration discovery processing would proceed
as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
While in the normal-operation state, the thread performing
discovery would fetch, for
successive file systems known to the client on the server being
worked on, a file system location attribute plus the fs_status attribute.
</li>
<li>
If the fs_status attribute indicates that the file system
is a migrated one (i.e., fss_absent is true, and
fss_type != STATUS4_REFERRAL), then a migrated file system has
been found. In this situation, it is likely
that the fetch of the file system location attribute has
cleared one of the file systems contributing to the
lease-migrated indication.
</li>
<li>
In cases in which that happened, the thread cannot know whether
the lease-migrated indication has been cleared, and so it enters the
completion/verification state and proceeds to issue a COMPOUND
to see if the SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED indication has been cleared.
</li>
<li>
When the discovery process is in the completion/verification state,
if other requests get a lease-migrated indication,
they note that it was received. Later, the existence of such
indications is used when the request completes, as described below.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When the request used in the completion/verification state completes:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If a lease-migrated indication is returned, the discovery
continues normally. Note that this is so even if all file systems
have been traversed, since new migrations could have occurred
while the process was going on.
</li>
<li>
Otherwise, if there is any record that other requests saw a
lease-migrated indication while the request was occurring,
that record is cleared, and the verification request is retried. The discovery
process remains in the completion/verification state.
</li>
<li>
If there have been no lease-migrated indications, the work of
migration discovery is considered completed, and it enters the
non-operating state. Once it enters this state, subsequent
lease-migrated indications will trigger a new migration discovery
process.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
It should be noted that the process described above is not
guaranteed to terminate, as a long series of new migration
events might continually delay the clearing of the SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED
indication. To prevent unnecessary lease expiration, it is
appropriate for clients
to use the discovery of migrations to effect lease
renewal immediately, rather than waiting for the clearing of the
SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED indication when the complete set of migrations is
available.
</t>
<t>
Lease discovery needs to be provided as described above. This
ensures that the client discovers file system migrations soon
enough to renew its leases on each destination server before they
expire. Non-renewal of leases can lead to loss of locking state.
While the consequences of such
loss can be ameliorated through implementations of courtesy locks,
servers are under no obligation to do so, and a conflicting lock request
may mean that a lock is revoked unexpectedly. Clients should be aware
of this possibility.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="V41c-omoved" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Overview of Client Response to NFS4ERR_MOVED</name>
<t>
This section outlines a way in which a client that receives
NFS4ERR_MOVED can effect transition recovery by using a new
server or server endpoint
if one is available. As part of that process, it will
determine:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Whether the NFS4ERR_MOVED indicates migration has occurred,
or whether it indicates another sort of file system
access transition as discussed
in <xref target="SEC11-nwa" format="default"/> above.
</li>
<li>
In the case of migration, whether Transparent State
Migration has occurred.
</li>
<li>
Whether any state has been lost during the process of
Transparent State Migration.
</li>
<li>
Whether sessions have been transferred as part of Transparent
State Migration.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
During the first phase of this process, the client proceeds to
examine file system location entries to find the initial
network address
it will use to continue access
to the file system or its replacement.
For each location entry that the client examines, the process
consists of five steps:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Performing an EXCHANGE_ID
directed at the location address. This operation is used to
register the client owner (in the form of a client_owner4)
with the server, to obtain a client ID
to be used subsequently to communicate with it, to obtain that
client ID's confirmation status, and to determine server_owner4
and scope for the purpose of determining if the entry
is trunkable with the address
previously being used to access the file system (i.e., that
it represents another network access path to the same
file system and can share locking state with it).
</li>
<li>
Making an initial determination of whether migration has
occurred. The initial determination will be based
on whether the EXCHANGE_ID results indicate that the
current location element is server-trunkable with that
used to access the file system when access
was terminated by receiving NFS4ERR_MOVED.
If it is, then migration has not occurred. In that case, the
transition is
dealt with, at least initially, as one involving continued
access to the same file system on the same server through
a new network address.
</li>
<li>
Obtaining access to existing session state or creating new
sessions. How this is done depends on the initial
determination of whether migration has occurred and
can be done as described in <xref target="V41c-ssmig" format="default"/> below
in the case of migration or as described in
<xref target="V41c-ssnwas" format="default"/> below
in the case of a network address transfer without migration.
</li>
<li>
Verifying the trunking relationship assumed in step
2 as discussed in <xref target="PREP-trunk-verify" format="default"/>.
Although this step will generally confirm the initial
determination, it is possible for verification to invalidate
the initial determination of network address shift (without
migration) and instead determine that migration had occurred.
There is no need to redo
step 3 above, since it will be possible to continue use of the
session established already.
</li>
<li>
Obtaining access to existing locking state and/or
re-obtaining it. How this is done depends on the final
determination of whether migration has occurred and
can be done as described below in <xref target="V41c-ssmig" format="default"/>
in the case of migration or as described in
<xref target="V41c-ssnwas" format="default"/>
in the case of a network address transfer without migration.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
Once the initial address has been determined, clients are free
to apply an abbreviated process to find additional addresses
trunkable with it (clients may seek session-trunkable or
server-trunkable addresses depending on whether they support
client ID trunking). During this later phase of the process,
further location entries are examined using the abbreviated
procedure specified below:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="%C:">
<li>
Before the EXCHANGE_ID, the fs name of the location
entry is examined, and if it
does not match that currently being used, the entry is ignored.
Otherwise, one proceeds as specified by step 1 above.
</li>
<li>
In the case that the network address is session-trunkable with one
used previously, a BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION is used to access that
session using the new network address. Otherwise, or if the bind
operation fails, a CREATE_SESSION is done.
</li>
<li>
The verification procedure referred to in step 4 above is
used. However, if it fails, the entry is ignored and the next
available entry is used.
</li>
</ol>
</section>
<section anchor="V41c-ssmig" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Obtaining Access to Sessions and State after Migration</name>
<t>
In the event that migration has occurred, migration recovery
will involve determining whether Transparent State Migration has
occurred. This decision is made based on the client ID returned
by the EXCHANGE_ID and the reported confirmation status.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the client ID is an unconfirmed client ID not previously known
to the client, then Transparent State Migration has not occurred.
</li>
<li>
If the client ID is a confirmed client ID previously known
to the client, then any transferred state would have been
merged with an existing client ID representing the client to the
destination server. In this state merger case, Transparent
State Migration might
or might not have occurred, and a determination as to whether
it has occurred is deferred until sessions are established
and the client is ready to begin state recovery.
</li>
<li>
If the client ID is a confirmed client ID not previously known
to the client, then the client can conclude that the
client ID was transferred as part of Transparent State Migration.
In this transferred client ID case, Transparent State Migration
has occurred, although some state might have been lost.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Once the client ID has been obtained, it is necessary to
obtain access to sessions to continue communication with the
new server.
In any of the cases in which Transparent State Migration
has occurred, it is possible that a session was transferred
as well. To deal with that possibility, clients can, after
doing the EXCHANGE_ID, issue a BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION to
connect the transferred session to a connection to the new
server. If that fails, it is an indication that the session
was not transferred and that a new session needs to be created to
take its place.
</t>
<t>
In some situations, it is possible for a BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION
to succeed without session migration having occurred. If
state merger has taken place, then the associated client ID
may have already had a set of existing sessions, with it
being possible that the session ID of a given session is the
same as one that might have been migrated. In that event,
a BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION might succeed, even though there
could have been no migration of the session with that session ID.
In such cases, the client will receive sequence errors when the
slot sequence values used are not appropriate on the new
session. When this occurs, the client can create a new a
session and cease using the existing one.
</t>
<t>
Once the client has determined the initial migration status,
and determined that there was a shift to a new server, it
needs to re-establish its locking state, if possible. To enable
this to happen without loss of the guarantees normally provided by
locking, the destination server needs to implement a per-fs grace
period in all cases in which lock state was lost, including
those in which Transparent State Migration was not
implemented. Each client for which there was a transfer of locking
state to the new server will have the duration of the grace period
to reclaim its locks, from the time its locks were transferred.
</t>
<t>
Clients need to deal with the following cases:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
In the state merger case, it is possible that the server
has not attempted Transparent State Migration,
in which case state may have been
lost without it being reflected in the SEQ4_STATUS bits.
To determine whether this has happened, the client can use
TEST_STATEID to check whether the stateids created on the
source server are still accessible on the destination server.
Once a single stateid is found to have been successfully
transferred, the client can conclude that Transparent State
Migration was begun, and any failure to transport all of the
stateids will be reflected in the SEQ4_STATUS bits. Otherwise,
Transparent State Migration has not occurred.
</li>
<li>
In a case in which Transparent State Migration has not
occurred, the client can use the per-fs grace period provided
by the destination server to reclaim locks that were held on
the source server.
</li>
<li>
In a case in which Transparent State Migration has
occurred, and no lock state was lost (as shown by SEQ4_STATUS
flags), no lock reclaim is necessary.
</li>
<li>
In a case in which Transparent State Migration has
occurred, and some lock state was lost (as shown by SEQ4_STATUS
flags), existing stateids need to be checked for validity
using TEST_STATEID, and reclaim used to re-establish any that
were not transferred.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
For all of the cases above, RECLAIM_COMPLETE with an rca_one_fs
value of TRUE needs to be done before
normal use of the file system, including obtaining new locks for the
file system. This applies even if no locks were lost and there
was no need for any to be reclaimed.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="V41c-ssnwas" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Obtaining Access to Sessions and State after Network Address Transfer</name>
<t>
The case in which there is a transfer to a new network
address without migration is similar to that described
in <xref target="V41c-ssmig" format="default"/> above in that there is a need to
obtain access to needed sessions and locking state. However,
the details are simpler and will vary depending on the
type of trunking between the address receiving
NFS4ERR_MOVED and that to which the transfer is to be made.
</t>
<t>
To make a session available for use, a BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION
should be used to obtain access to the session previously
in use. Only if this fails, should a CREATE_SESSION be done.
While this procedure mirrors that in <xref target="V41c-ssmig" format="default"/>
above,
there is an important difference in that preservation of the
session is not purely optional but depends on the type of
trunking.
</t>
<t>
Access to appropriate locking state will generally need no actions
beyond access to the session. However, the SEQ4_STATUS bits need to be
checked for lost locking state, including the need to reclaim
locks after a server reboot, since there is always a possibility
of locking state being lost.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-trans-server" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Responsibilities Upon Migration</name>
<t>
In the event of file system migration, when the client connects
to the destination server, that server needs to be able to provide the
client continued access to the files it had open on the source server.
There are two ways to provide this:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
By provision of an fs-specific grace period, allowing the client the
ability to reclaim its locks, in a fashion similar to what would
have been done in the case of recovery from a server restart. See
<xref target="SEC11-XS-reclaim" format="default"/> for a more complete
discussion.
</li>
<li>
<t>
By implementing Transparent State Migration possibly in
connection with session migration, the server can provide
the client immediate access to the state built up on the
source server on the destination server.
</t>
<t>
These features are discussed separately in Sections
<xref target="SEC11-XS-lock" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="SEC11-XS-session" format="counter"/>,
which discuss Transparent State Migration and session
migration, respectively.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
All the features described above can involve transfer of
lock-related information between source and destination
servers. In some cases, this transfer is a necessary part
of the implementation, while in other cases, it is a helpful
implementation aid, which servers might or might not use.
The subsections below discuss the information that would be
transferred but do not define the specifics of the transfer
protocol. This is left as an implementation choice, although
standards in this area could be developed at a later time.
</t>
<section anchor="SEC11-XS-reclaim" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Responsibilities in Effecting State Reclaim after Migration</name>
<t>
In this case, the destination server needs no knowledge of
the locks held
on the source server. It relies on the clients to accurately report
(via reclaim operations) the locks previously held, and does not allow
new locks to be granted on migrated file systems until the grace
period expires. Disallowing of new locks applies to
all clients accessing these file systems, while grace period
expiration occurs for each migrated client independently.
</t>
<t>
During this grace period, clients have the opportunity to use
reclaim operations to obtain locks for file system objects within
the migrated file system, in the same way that they do when
recovering from server restart, and the servers typically
rely on clients to accurately report their locks, although they
have the option of subjecting these requests to verification.
If the clients only reclaim locks held on the source server, no
conflict can arise. Once the client has reclaimed its locks,
it indicates the completion of lock reclamation by performing a
RECLAIM_COMPLETE specifying rca_one_fs as TRUE.
</t>
<t>
While it is not necessary for source and destination servers
to cooperate to transfer information about locks, implementations
are well advised to consider transferring the following
useful information:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If information about the set of clients that have
locking state for the transferred file system is made available,
the destination
server will be able to terminate the grace period once all
such clients have reclaimed their locks, allowing normal
locking activity to resume earlier than it would have otherwise.
</li>
<li>
Locking summary information for individual clients (at various
possible levels of detail) can detect
some instances in which clients do not accurately represent the
locks held on the source server.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-XS-lock" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Responsibilities in Effecting Transparent State Migration</name>
<t>
The basic responsibility of the source server in effecting
Transparent State Migration is to make available to the
destination server a description of each piece of locking state
associated with the file system being migrated. In addition to
client id string and verifier, the source server needs to provide
for each stateid:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The stateid including the current sequence value.
</li>
<li>
The associated client ID.
</li>
<li>
The handle of the associated file.
</li>
<li>
The type of the lock, such as open, byte-range lock, delegation,
or layout.
</li>
<li>
For locks such as opens and byte-range locks, there will be
information about the owner(s) of the lock.
</li>
<li>
For recallable/revocable lock types, the current recall status
needs to be included.
</li>
<li>
For each lock type, there will be associated type-specific
information. For opens, this will include share and deny mode
while for byte-range locks and layouts, there will be a type and
a byte-range.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Such information will most probably be organized by client id string
on the destination server
so that it can be used to provide appropriate context to each client
when it makes itself known to the client. Issues connected with a
client impersonating another by presenting another client's client
id string can be addressed using NFSv4.1 state protection features,
as described in <xref target="SECCON" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
A further server responsibility concerns locks that are revoked
or otherwise lost during the process of file system migration.
Because locks that appear to be lost during the process of
migration will be reclaimed by the client, the servers have to
take steps to ensure that locks revoked soon before or soon
after migration are not inadvertently allowed to be reclaimed
in situations in which the continuity of lock possession
cannot be assured.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
For locks lost on the source but whose loss has not yet been
acknowledged by the client (by using FREE_STATEID), the
destination must be aware of this loss so that it can deny
a request to reclaim them.
</li>
<li>
For locks lost on the destination after the state transfer
but before the client's RECLAIM_COMPLETE is done, the
destination server should note these and not allow them to
be reclaimed.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
An additional responsibility of the cooperating
servers concerns situations
in which a stateid cannot be transferred transparently because it
conflicts with an existing stateid held by the client and
associated with a different file system. In this case, there
are two valid choices:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Treat the transfer, as in NFSv4.0, as one without Transparent
State Migration. In this case, conflicting locks cannot be
granted until the client does a RECLAIM_COMPLETE, after
reclaiming the locks it had, with the exception of reclaims
denied because they were attempts to reclaim locks that had
been lost.
</li>
<li>
Implement Transparent State Migration, except for the lock
with the conflicting stateid. In this case, the client will
be aware of a lost lock (through the SEQ4_STATUS flags) and be
allowed to reclaim it.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When transferring state between the source and destination, the
issues discussed in <xref target="RFC7931" sectionFormat="of" section="7.2"/>
must still be attended to. In this case, the use of NFS4ERR_DELAY may still be
necessary in NFSv4.1, as it was in NFSv4.0, to prevent locking
state changing while it is being transferred. See
<xref target="err_DELAY" format="default"/> for information about
appropriate client retry approaches in the event that NFS4ERR_DELAY
is returned.
</t>
<t>
There are a number of important differences in the NFS4.1
context:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The absence of RELEASE_LOCKOWNER means that the one case
in which an operation could not be deferred by use of
NFS4ERR_DELAY no longer exists.
</li>
<li>
Sequencing of operations is no longer done using owner-based
operation sequences numbers. Instead, sequencing is session-
based.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
As a result, when sessions are not transferred, the techniques
discussed in <xref target="RFC7931" sectionFormat="of" section="7.2"/>
are adequate and will not be further discussed.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-XS-session" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Responsibilities in Effecting Session Transfer</name>
<t>
The basic responsibility of the source server in effecting
session transfer is to make available to the
destination server a description of the current state of each
slot with the session, including the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The last sequence value received for that slot.
</li>
<li>
Whether there is cached reply data for the last request
executed and, if so, the cached reply.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When sessions are transferred, there are a number of issues that
pose challenges in terms of making the transferred state
unmodifiable during the period it is gathered up and
transferred to the destination server:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
A single session may be used to access multiple file systems,
not all of which are being transferred.
</li>
<li>
Requests made on a session may, even if rejected, affect
the state of the session by advancing the sequence number
associated with the slot used.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
As a result, when the file system state might otherwise be
considered unmodifiable, the client might have any number of
in-flight requests, each of which is capable of changing session
state, which may be of a number of types:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Those requests that were processed on the migrating file system
before migration began.
</li>
<li>
Those requests that received the error NFS4ERR_DELAY because the
file system being accessed was in the process of being
migrated.
</li>
<li>
Those requests that received the error NFS4ERR_MOVED because the
file system being accessed had been migrated.
</li>
<li>
Those requests that accessed the migrating file system
in order to obtain location or status information.
</li>
<li>
Those requests that did not reference the migrating file system.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
It should be noted that the history of any particular slot is likely
to include a number of these request classes. In the case in which
a session that is migrated is used by file systems other than the
one migrated, requests of class 5 may be common and may be the last
request processed for many slots.
</t>
<t>
Since session state can change even after the locking
state has been fixed as part of the migration process,
the session state known to the client could be different from that on
the destination server, which necessarily reflects the session
state on the source server at an earlier time.
In deciding how to deal with this situation, it is helpful to
distinguish between two sorts of behavioral consequences of
the choice of initial sequence ID values:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
The error NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED is returned when the sequence ID
in a request is neither equal to the last one seen for the
current slot nor the next greater one.
</t>
<t>
In view of the difficulty of arriving at a mutually acceptable
value for the correct last sequence value at the point of migration,
it may be necessary for the server to show some degree of
forbearance when the sequence ID is one that would be
considered unacceptable if session migration were not
involved.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Returning the cached reply for a previously executed
request when the sequence ID
in the request matches the last value recorded for the slot.
</t>
<t>
In the cases in which an error is returned and there is no
possibility of any non-idempotent operation having been executed,
it may not be necessary to adhere to this as strictly as might
be proper if session migration were not involved. For example,
the fact that the error NFS4ERR_DELAY
was returned may not assist the client in any material way, while
the fact that NFS4ERR_MOVED was returned by the source server
may not be relevant when the request was reissued and directed
to the destination server.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
An important issue is that the specification needs to take note of
all potential COMPOUNDs, even if they might be unlikely
in practice. For example, a COMPOUND is allowed to access
multiple file systems and might perform non-idempotent operations
in some of them before accessing a file system being migrated.
Also, a COMPOUND may return considerable data in the response
before being rejected with NFS4ERR_DELAY or NFS4ERR_MOVED, and may
in addition be marked as sa_cachethis. However, note that
if the client and server adhere to rules in
<xref target="err_DELAY" format="default"/>, there is no possibility of
non-idempotent operations being spuriously reissued after receiving
NFS4ERR_DELAY response.
</t>
<t>
To address these issues, a destination server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> do any of
the following when implementing session transfer:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Avoid enforcing any sequencing semantics for a particular slot
until the client has established the starting sequence for that
slot on the destination server.
</li>
<li>
For each slot, avoid
returning a cached reply returning NFS4ERR_DELAY or NFS4ERR_MOVED
until the client has established the starting sequence for that
slot on the destination server.
</li>
<li>
Until the client has established the starting sequence for a
particular slot on the destination server, avoid reporting
NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED or returning a cached reply that contains
either NFS4ERR_DELAY or NFS4ERR_MOVED and consists solely of
a series of operations where the response is NFS4_OK until the
final error.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Because of the considerations mentioned above, including the rules
for the handling of NFS4ERR_DELAY included in
<xref target="err_DELAY" format="default"/>, the destination
server can respond appropriately to SEQUENCE operations received
from the client by adopting the three policies listed below:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Not responding with NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED for the initial
request on a slot within a transferred session because the
destination server cannot be aware of requests made by the
client after the server handoff but before the client became
aware of the shift. In cases in which NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED
would normally have been reported, the request is to be processed
normally as a new request.
</li>
<li>
Replying as it would for a retry whenever the sequence matches
that transferred by the source server, even though this would
not provide retry handling for requests issued after the server
handoff, under the assumption that, when such requests are issued,
they will never be responded to in a state-changing fashion,
making retry support for them unnecessary.
</li>
<li>
Once a non-retry SEQUENCE is received for a given slot, using
that as the basis for further sequence checking, with no further
reference to the sequence value transferred by the source server.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="effecting_referrals" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Effecting File System Referrals</name>
<t>
Referrals are effected when an absent file system is encountered
and one or more alternate locations are made available by the
fs_locations or fs_locations_info attributes. The client will
typically get an NFS4ERR_MOVED error, fetch the appropriate
location information, and proceed to access the file system on
a different server, even though it retains its logical position
within the original namespace. Referrals differ from migration
events in that they happen only when the client has not
previously referenced the file system in question (so there
is nothing to transition). Referrals can only come into
effect when an absent file system is encountered at its
root.
</t>
<t>
The examples given in the sections below are somewhat artificial in
that an actual client will not typically do a multi-component
look up, but will have cached information regarding the upper levels
of the name hierarchy. However, these examples are chosen to make
the required behavior clear and easy to put within the scope of a
small number of requests, without getting into a discussion of the details of
how specific clients might choose to cache things.
</t>
<section anchor="referrals_lookup" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Referral Example (LOOKUP)</name>
<t>
Let us suppose that the following COMPOUND is sent in an
environment in which /this/is/the/path is absent from the
target server. This may be for a number of reasons. It may
be that the file system has moved, or it may be that
the target server is functioning mainly, or solely, to refer
clients to the servers on which various file systems are located.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTROOTFH
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "this"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "is"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "the"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "path"
</li>
<li>
GETFH
</li>
<li>
GETATTR (fsid, fileid, size, time_modify)
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Under the given circumstances, the following will be the result.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTROOTFH --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is now the root of
the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "this" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this and is
within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "is" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this/is
and is within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "the" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this/is/the
and is within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "path" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for
/this/is/the/path and is within a new, absent file system, but ...
the client will never see the value of that fh.
</li>
<li>
GETFH --&gt; NFS4ERR_MOVED.
Fails because current fh is in an absent file system at the start of
the operation, and the specification makes no exception for GETFH.
</li>
<li>
GETATTR (fsid, fileid, size, time_modify).
Not executed because the failure of the GETFH stops processing
of the COMPOUND.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Given the failure of the GETFH, the client has the job of
determining the root of the absent file system and where to find
that file system, i.e., the server and path relative to that
server's root fh. Note that in this example, the client did
not obtain filehandles and attribute information (e.g., fsid) for
the intermediate directories, so that it would not be sure where
the absent file system starts. It could be the case, for example,
that /this/is/the is the root of the moved file system and that
the reason that the look up of "path" succeeded is that the
file system was not absent on that operation but was moved between the last
LOOKUP and the GETFH (since COMPOUND is not atomic). Even if we
had the fsids for all of the intermediate directories, we could
have no way of knowing that /this/is/the/path was the root of a
new file system, since we don't yet have its fsid.
</t>
<t>
In order to get the necessary information, let us re-send the
chain of LOOKUPs with GETFHs and GETATTRs to at least get the
fsids so we can be sure where the appropriate file system boundaries are.
The client could choose to get fs_locations_info
at the same time but in
most cases the client will have a good guess as to where file system
boundaries are (because of where NFS4ERR_MOVED was, and was not,
received) making fetching of fs_locations_info unnecessary.
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>OP01:</dt>
<dd><t>PUTROOTFH --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>Current fh is root of pseudo-fs.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP02:</dt>
<dd><t>GETATTR(fsid) --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>Just for completeness. Normally, clients will know the fsid
of the pseudo-fs as soon as they establish communication with
a server.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP03:</dt>
<dd>LOOKUP "this" --&gt; NFS_OK</dd>
<dt>OP04:</dt>
<dd><t>GETATTR(fsid) --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>
Get current fsid to see where file system boundaries are. The fsid
will be that for the pseudo-fs in this example, so no
boundary.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP05:</dt>
<dd><t>GETFH --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>Current fh is for /this and is within pseudo-fs.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP06:</dt>
<dd><t>LOOKUP "is" --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>Current fh is for /this/is and is within pseudo-fs.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP07:</dt>
<dd><t>GETATTR(fsid) --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>
Get current fsid to see where file system boundaries are. The fsid
will be that for the pseudo-fs in this example, so no
boundary.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP08:</dt>
<dd>
<t>GETFH --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>Current fh is for /this/is and is within pseudo-fs.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP09:</dt>
<dd>
<t>LOOKUP "the" --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>
Current fh is for /this/is/the and is within pseudo-fs.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP10:</dt>
<dd>
<t>GETATTR(fsid) --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>
Get current fsid to see where file system boundaries are. The fsid
will be that for the pseudo-fs in this example, so no
boundary.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP11:</dt>
<dd>
<t>GETFH --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>Current fh is for /this/is/the and is within pseudo-fs.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP12:</dt>
<dd>
<t>LOOKUP "path" --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>
Current fh is for /this/is/the/path and is within a new,
absent file system, but ...</li>
<li>
The client will never see the value of that fh.</li></ul>
</dd>
<dt>OP13:</dt>
<dd>
<t>GETATTR(fsid, fs_locations_info) --&gt; NFS_OK</t>
<ul><li>
We are getting the fsid to know where the file system boundaries are.
In this operation, the fsid will be different than that of the
parent directory (which in turn was retrieved in OP10).
Note that the fsid we are given will not necessarily be preserved at the new
location. That fsid might be different, and in fact the fsid
we have for this file system might be a valid fsid of a different
file system on that new server.</li>
<li>
In this particular case, we are pretty sure anyway that what
has moved is /this/is/the/path rather than /this/is/the
since we have the fsid of the latter and it is that of the
pseudo-fs, which presumably cannot move. However, in other
examples, we might not have this kind of information to rely
on (e.g., /this/is/the might be a non-pseudo file system
separate from /this/is/the/path), so we need to have
other reliable source information on the boundary of the file system
that is moved. If, for example, the file system /this/is
had moved, we would have a case of migration rather than
referral, and once the boundaries of the migrated file system
was clear we could fetch fs_locations_info.</li>
<li>
We are fetching fs_locations_info because the fact that we got an
NFS4ERR_MOVED at this point means that it is most likely that
this is a referral and we need the destination. Even if it is
the case that /this/is/the is a file system that has
migrated, we will still need the location information for that
file system.</li></ul></dd>
<dt>OP14:</dt>
<dd>
<t>GETFH --&gt; NFS4ERR_MOVED</t>
<ul><li>
Fails because current fh is in an absent file system at the start of
the operation, and the specification makes no exception for GETFH. Note
that this means the server will never send the client a
filehandle from within an absent file system.</li></ul>
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
Given the above, the client knows where the root of the absent file
system is (/this/is/the/path) by noting where the change of
fsid occurred (between "the" and "path"). The
fs_locations_info attribute also gives the client the
actual location of
the absent file system, so that the referral can proceed. The
server gives the client the bare minimum of information about the
absent file system so that there will be very little scope for
problems of conflict between information sent by the referring
server and information of the file system's home. No filehandles
and very few attributes are present on the referring server, and the
client can treat those it receives as transient
information with the function of enabling the referral.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="referrals_readdir" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Referral Example (READDIR)</name>
<t>
Another context in which a client may encounter referrals is when
it does a READDIR on a directory in which some of the sub-directories
are the roots of absent file systems.
</t>
<t>
Suppose such a directory is read as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTROOTFH
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "this"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "is"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "the"
</li>
<li>
READDIR (fsid, size, time_modify, mounted_on_fileid)
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In this case, because rdattr_error is not requested,
fs_locations_info
is not requested, and some of the attributes cannot be provided, the
result will be an NFS4ERR_MOVED error on the READDIR, with the
detailed results as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTROOTFH --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is at the root of the
pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "this" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this and is
within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "is" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this/is
and is within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "the" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this/is/the
and is within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
READDIR (fsid, size, time_modify, mounted_on_fileid) --&gt;
NFS4ERR_MOVED. Note that the same error would have been
returned if /this/is/the had migrated, but it is returned because the
directory contains the root of an absent file system.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
So now suppose that we re-send with rdattr_error:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTROOTFH
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "this"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "is"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "the"
</li>
<li>
READDIR (rdattr_error, fsid, size, time_modify, mounted_on_fileid)
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The results will be:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTROOTFH --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is at the root of the
pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "this" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this and is
within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "is" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this/is
and is within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "the" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this/is/the
and is within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
READDIR (rdattr_error, fsid, size, time_modify, mounted_on_fileid)
--&gt; NFS_OK. The attributes for directory entry with the
component named "path" will only contain
rdattr_error
with the value NFS4ERR_MOVED, together with an fsid
value and a value for mounted_on_fileid.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Suppose we do another READDIR to get fs_locations_info (although
we could have used a GETATTR directly, as in
<xref target="referrals_lookup" format="default"/>).
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTROOTFH
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "this"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "is"
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "the"
</li>
<li>
READDIR (rdattr_error, fs_locations_info, mounted_on_fileid, fsid,
size, time_modify)
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The results would be:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTROOTFH --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is at the root of the
pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "this" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this and is
within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "is" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this/is
and is within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP "the" --&gt; NFS_OK. The current fh is for /this/is/the
and is within the pseudo-fs.
</li>
<li>
READDIR (rdattr_error, fs_locations_info, mounted_on_fileid, fsid,
size, time_modify) --&gt; NFS_OK. The attributes will be as shown below.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The attributes for the directory entry with the
component named "path" will only contain:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
rdattr_error (value: NFS_OK)
</li>
<li>
fs_locations_info
</li>
<li>
mounted_on_fileid (value: unique fileid within referring file system)
</li>
<li>
fsid (value: unique value within referring server)
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The attributes for entry "path" will not contain size or
time_modify because these attributes are not available within an
absent file system.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="fs_locations" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The Attribute fs_locations</name>
<t>
The fs_locations attribute is structured in the following way:
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct fs_location4 {
utf8str_cis server<>;
pathname4 rootpath;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct fs_locations4 {
pathname4 fs_root;
fs_location4 locations<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The fs_location4 data type is used to represent the location of a
file system by providing a server name and the path to the root
of the file system within that server's namespace.
When a set of servers have corresponding file systems at the
same path within their namespaces, an array of server names may
be provided. An
entry in the server array is a UTF-8 string and represents one
of a
traditional DNS host name, IPv4 address, IPv6 address, or a
zero-length string.
An IPv4 or IPv6 address is represented as a universal
address (see <xref target="netaddr4" format="default"/> and <xref target="RFC5665" format="default"/>), minus the netid, and either with
or without the trailing ".p1.p2" suffix that
represents the port number. If the suffix is omitted,
then the default port, 2049, <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be assumed.
A zero-length string <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be used to indicate the current address
being used for the RPC call. It is not
a requirement that all servers that share the same rootpath
be listed
in one fs_location4 instance. The array of server names is provided for
convenience. Servers that share the same rootpath may also be listed
in separate fs_location4 entries in the fs_locations attribute.
</t>
<t>
The fs_locations4 data type and the fs_locations attribute each
contain an array of
such locations. Since the namespace of each server may be
constructed differently, the "fs_root" field is provided. The
path represented
by fs_root represents the location of the file system in the
current server's namespace, i.e., that of the
server from which the fs_locations attribute was obtained. The
fs_root path is meant to aid the client by clearly referencing
the root of the file system whose locations are being reported,
no matter what object within the current file system the
current filehandle designates. The fs_root is simply the
pathname the client used to reach the object on the current server
(i.e., the object to which the fs_locations attribute applies).
</t>
<t>
When the fs_locations attribute
is interrogated and there are no alternate file system locations,
the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return a zero-length array of fs_location4
structures, together with a valid fs_root.
</t>
<t>
As an example, suppose there is a replicated file system located
at two
servers (servA and servB). At servA, the file system is located at
path /a/b/c. At, servB the file system is located at path /x/y/z.
If the client were to obtain the fs_locations value for the
directory at /a/b/c/d, it might not necessarily know
that the file system's root is located in servA's namespace
at /a/b/c. When the client switches to servB, it will need
to determine that the directory it first referenced at servA is now
represented by the path /x/y/z/d on servB. To facilitate this, the
fs_locations attribute provided by servA would have an fs_root value
of /a/b/c and two entries in fs_locations. One entry in fs_locations
will be for itself (servA) and the other will be for servB with a
path of /x/y/z. With this information, the client is able to
substitute /x/y/z for the /a/b/c at the beginning of its access
path and construct /x/y/z/d to use for the new server.
</t>
<t>
Note that there is no requirement that the number
of components in each rootpath be the same; there
is no relation between the number of components in
rootpath or fs_root, and none of the components
in a rootpath and fs_root have to be the same. In
the above example, we could have had a third element
in the locations array, with server equal to "servC"
and rootpath equal to "/I/II", and a fourth element in
locations with server equal to "servD" and rootpath
equal to "/aleph/beth/gimel/daleth/he".
</t>
<t>
The relationship between fs_root to a rootpath is
that the client replaces the pathname indicated in
fs_root for the current server for the substitute
indicated in rootpath for the new server.
</t>
<t>
For an example of a referred or migrated file
system, suppose there is a file system located
at serv1. At serv1, the file system is located at
/az/buky/vedi/glagoli. The client finds that object
at glagoli has migrated (or is a referral). The
client gets the fs_locations attribute, which contains
an fs_root of /az/buky/vedi/glagoli, and one element
in the locations array, with server equal to serv2,
and rootpath equal to /izhitsa/fita. The client
replaces /az/buky/vedi/glagoli with /izhitsa/fita,
and uses the latter pathname on serv2.
</t>
<t>
Thus, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return an fs_root that is equal
to the path the client used to reach the object to which the
fs_locations attribute applies. Otherwise, the
client cannot determine the new path to use on the new server.
</t>
<t>
Since the fs_locations attribute lacks information defining various
attributes of the various file system choices presented, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
only be interrogated and used when fs_locations_info is not available.
When fs_locations is used, information about the
specific locations should be assumed based on the following rules.
</t>
<t>
The following rules are general and apply irrespective of the
context.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
All listed
file system instances should be considered as of the
same handle class, if and only if, the
current fh_expire_type attribute does not include the
FH4_VOL_MIGRATION
bit. Note that in the case of referral, filehandle issues do
not apply since there can be no filehandles known within the
current file system, nor is there any access to the fh_expire_type
attribute on the referring (absent) file system.
</li>
<li>
All listed file system instances should be considered as of the
same fileid class if and only if the
fh_expire_type attribute indicates persistent filehandles and
does not include the FH4_VOL_MIGRATION
bit. Note that in the case of referral, fileid issues do
not apply since there can be no fileids known within the
referring (absent) file system, nor is there any access to
the fh_expire_type attribute.
</li>
<li>
All file system instances
servers should be considered as of different
change classes.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
For other class assignments, handling of file system
transitions depends on the reasons for the transition:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When the transition is due to migration, that is, the client was
directed to a new file system after receiving an NFS4ERR_MOVED error,
the target should be
treated as being of the same
write-verifier class as the source.
</li>
<li>
When the transition is due to failover to another replica,
that is, the client selected another replica without
receiving an NFS4ERR_MOVED error, the target should be
treated as being of a different
write-verifier class from the source.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The specific choices reflect typical implementation patterns for
failover and controlled migration, respectively. Since other
choices are possible and useful, this information is better
obtained by using fs_locations_info. When a server implementation
needs to communicate other choices, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the
fs_locations_info attribute.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="SECCON" format="default"/> for a
discussion on the recommendations for the security
flavor to be used by any GETATTR operation that
requests the fs_locations attribute.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-li-new" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The Attribute fs_locations_info</name>
<t>
The fs_locations_info attribute is intended as a more functional
replacement for the fs_locations attribute, which will continue to exist
and be supported. Clients can use it to get a more complete set of
data about alternative file system locations, including additional
network paths to access replicas in use and additional replicas.
When the server does not support
fs_locations_info, fs_locations can be used to get a subset of the
data. A server that supports fs_locations_info <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support
fs_locations as well.
</t>
<t>
There is additional data present in
fs_locations_info that is not available in fs_locations:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Attribute continuity information. This information
will allow a client to select a
replica that meets the transparency requirements of the
applications accessing the data and to leverage
optimizations due to the server guarantees of attribute
continuity (e.g., if the
change attribute of a file of the file system is continuous
between multiple replicas,
the client does not have to invalidate the file's cache
when switching to a different replica).
</li>
<li>
<t>
File system identity information that indicates when multiple
replicas, from the client's point of view, correspond to the
same target file system, allowing them to be used
interchangeably, without disruption, as distinct synchronized
replicas of the same file data.
</t>
<t>
Note that having two replicas with common identity information is
distinct from the case of two (trunked) paths to the same
replica.
</t>
</li>
<li>
Information that will bear on the suitability of various
replicas, depending on the use that the client intends. For
example, many applications need an absolutely up-to-date copy
(e.g., those that write), while others may only need access to
the most up-to-date copy reasonably available.
</li>
<li>
Server-derived preference information for replicas, which can
be used to implement load-balancing while giving the client
the entire file system list to be used in case the primary fails.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The fs_locations_info attribute is structured similarly to the
fs_locations attribute. A top-level structure
(fs_locations_info4) contains the entire attribute including the root
pathname of the file system and an array of lower-level structures that
define replicas that share a common rootpath on their respective
servers. The lower-level structure in turn
(fs_locations_item4) contains a specific pathname and information on one
or more individual network access paths. For that last, lowest level,
fs_locations_info has an fs_locations_server4
structure that contains per-server-replica information in addition
to the file system
location entry. This per-server-replica information includes a
nominally opaque array, fls_info, within which specific pieces
of information are located at the specific indices listed below.
</t>
<t>
Two fs_location_server4 entries that are within different
fs_location_item4 structures are never trunkable, while two entries
within in the same fs_location_item4 structure might or might not be
trunkable. Two entries that are trunkable will have identical
identity information, although, as noted above, the converse is
not the case.
</t>
<t>
The attribute will always contain at least a single fs_locations_server
entry. Typically, there will be an entry with the FS4LIGF_CUR_REQ
flag set, although in the case of a referral there will be no
entry with that flag set.
</t>
<t>
It should be noted that fs_locations_info attributes returned by
servers for various replicas may differ for various reasons.
One server may know about a set of replicas that are not known to
other servers. Further, compatibility attributes may differ.
Filehandles might be of the same class going from replica A to
replica B but not going in the reverse direction. This might happen
because the filehandles are the same, but
replica B's server implementation might not have provision to note
and report that equivalence.
</t>
<t>
The fs_locations_info attribute consists of a root
pathname (fli_fs_root, just like fs_root in the
fs_locations attribute), together with an array of
fs_location_item4 structures. The fs_location_item4
structures in turn consist of a root pathname
(fli_rootpath) together with an array (fli_entries)
of elements of data type fs_locations_server4,
all defined as follows.
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* Defines an individual server access path
*/
struct fs_locations_server4 {
int32_t fls_currency;
opaque fls_info<>;
utf8str_cis fls_server;
};
/*
* Byte indices of items within
* fls_info: flag fields, class numbers,
* bytes indicating ranks and orders.
*/
const FSLI4BX_GFLAGS = 0;
const FSLI4BX_TFLAGS = 1;
const FSLI4BX_CLSIMUL = 2;
const FSLI4BX_CLHANDLE = 3;
const FSLI4BX_CLFILEID = 4;
const FSLI4BX_CLWRITEVER = 5;
const FSLI4BX_CLCHANGE = 6;
const FSLI4BX_CLREADDIR = 7;
const FSLI4BX_READRANK = 8;
const FSLI4BX_WRITERANK = 9;
const FSLI4BX_READORDER = 10;
const FSLI4BX_WRITEORDER = 11;
/*
* Bits defined within the general flag byte.
*/
const FSLI4GF_WRITABLE = 0x01;
const FSLI4GF_CUR_REQ = 0x02;
const FSLI4GF_ABSENT = 0x04;
const FSLI4GF_GOING = 0x08;
const FSLI4GF_SPLIT = 0x10;
/*
* Bits defined within the transport flag byte.
*/
const FSLI4TF_RDMA = 0x01;
/*
* Defines a set of replicas sharing
* a common value of the rootpath
* within the corresponding
* single-server namespaces.
*/
struct fs_locations_item4 {
fs_locations_server4 fli_entries<>;
pathname4 fli_rootpath;
};
/*
* Defines the overall structure of
* the fs_locations_info attribute.
*/
struct fs_locations_info4 {
uint32_t fli_flags;
int32_t fli_valid_for;
pathname4 fli_fs_root;
fs_locations_item4 fli_items<>;
};
/*
* Flag bits in fli_flags.
*/
const FSLI4IF_VAR_SUB = 0x00000001;
typedef fs_locations_info4 fattr4_fs_locations_info;
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
As noted above, the fs_locations_info attribute, when supported, may
be requested of absent file systems without causing NFS4ERR_MOVED to
be returned. It is generally expected that it will be available for
both present and absent file systems even if only a single
fs_locations_server4 entry is present, designating the current (present)
file system, or two fs_locations_server4 entries designating the
previous location of an absent file system (the one just referenced) and its
successor location. Servers are strongly urged to support this
attribute on all file systems if they support it on any file system.
</t>
<t>
The data presented in the fs_locations_info attribute may be obtained
by the server in any number of ways, including specification by
the administrator or by current protocols for transferring data
among replicas and protocols not yet developed. NFSv4.1 only defines
how this information is presented by the server to
the client.
</t>
<section anchor="SEC11-fsli-server" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The fs_locations_server4 Structure</name>
<t>
The fs_locations_server4 structure consists of the following items
in addition to the fls_server field, which specifies a network
address or set of addresses to be used to access the specified file
system. Note that both of these items (i.e., fls_currency and
fls_info)
specify attributes of the
file system replica and should not be different when there are
multiple fs_locations_server4 structures, each
specifying a network path to the chosen replica, for the same
replica.
</t>
<t>
When these values are different in two fs_locations_server4 structures,
a client has no basis for choosing one over the other and is best off
simply ignoring both entries, whether these entries apply to migration
replication or referral. When there are more than two such entries,
majority voting can be used to exclude a single erroneous entry from
consideration. In the case in which trunking information is provided
for a replica currently being accessed, the additional trunked addresses
can be ignored while access continues on the address currently being
used, even if the entry corresponding to that path might be considered
invalid.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
An indication of how up-to-date the file system is (fls_currency) in
seconds. This value
is relative to the master copy. A negative
value indicates that the server is unable to give any
reasonably useful value here. A value of zero indicates that the
file system is the actual writable data or a reliably coherent
and fully up-to-date copy. Positive values indicate how
out-of-date this copy can normally be before it is considered for
update. Such a value is not a guarantee that such updates
will always be performed on the required schedule but instead
serves as a hint about how far the copy of the data would be
expected to be behind the most up-to-date copy.
</li>
<li>
A counted array of one-byte values (fls_info) containing
information about the particular file system instance. This
data includes general flags, transport capability flags,
file system equivalence class information, and selection
priority information. The encoding will be discussed below.
</li>
<li>
The server string (fls_server). For the case of the
replica currently
being accessed (via GETATTR), a zero-length string <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used to
indicate the current address being used for the RPC call.
The fls_server field can also be an IPv4 or IPv6 address,
formatted the same way as an IPv4 or IPv6 address in the "server"
field of the fs_location4 data type (see
<xref target="fs_locations" format="default"/>).
</li>
</ul>
<t>
With the exception of the transport-flag field (at offset
FSLI4BX_TFLAGS with the fls_info array), all of this data defined
in this specification applies to the replica specified by the entry,
rather than the specific network path used to access it.
The classification of data in extensions to this data is discussed below.
</t>
<t>
Data within the fls_info array is in the form of 8-bit data items
with constants giving the offsets within the array of various
values describing this particular file system instance.
This style of
definition was chosen, in preference to explicit XDR
structure definitions for these values, for a number of
reasons.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The kinds of data in the fls_info array, representing flags,
file system classes, and priorities among sets of file systems
representing the same data, are such that 8 bits provide
a quite acceptable range of values. Even where there might
be more than 256 such file system instances, having more than
256 distinct classes or priorities is unlikely.
</li>
<li>
Explicit definition of the various specific data items within
XDR would limit expandability in that any extension within
would require yet another attribute,
leading to specification and implementation clumsiness.
In the context of the NFSv4 extension model in effect at the time
fs_locations_info was designed (i.e., that which is described in
RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>), this would
necessitate a new minor version
to effect any Standards Track extension to the data in fls_info.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The set of fls_info data is subject to expansion in a future minor
version or in a Standards Track RFC within the context of a single
minor version. The server <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> send and the
client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use indices within the fls_info array
or flag bits that are not defined in Standards Track RFCs.
</t>
<t>
In light of the new extension model defined in RFC 8178
<xref target="RFC8178" format="default"/>
and the fact that the individual items within fls_info are not
explicitly referenced in the XDR, the following practices should be
followed when extending or otherwise changing the structure of
the data returned in fls_info within the scope of a single minor
version:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
All extensions need to be described by Standards Track documents.
There is no need for such documents to be marked as updating
RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> or this document.
</li>
<li>
It needs to be made clear whether the information in any added data
items applies to the replica specified by the entry or to the specific
network paths specified in the entry.
</li>
<li>
There needs to be a reliable way defined to determine whether the
server is aware of the extension. This may be based on the
length field of the fls_info array, but it is more flexible to
provide fs-scope or server-scope attributes to indicate what
extensions are provided.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
This encoding scheme can be adapted to the specification of
multi-byte numeric values, even though none are currently
defined. If extensions are made via Standards Track RFCs,
multi-byte quantities will be encoded as a range of bytes
with a range of indices, with the byte interpreted in big-endian
byte order. Further, any such index assignments will be constrained
by the need for the relevant quantities not to
cross XDR word boundaries.
</t>
<t>
The fls_info array currently contains:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Two 8-bit flag fields, one devoted to general file-system
characteristics and a second reserved for transport-related
capabilities.
</li>
<li>
Six 8-bit class values that define various file system
equivalence classes as explained below.
</li>
<li>
Four 8-bit priority values that govern file system selection
as explained below.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The general file system characteristics flag (at byte index
FSLI4BX_GFLAGS) has the following
bits defined within it:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
FSLI4GF_WRITABLE indicates that this file system target is writable,
allowing it to be selected by clients that may need to write
on this file system. When the current file system instance
is writable and is defined as of the same simultaneous use
class (as specified by the value at index FSLI4BX_CLSIMUL)
to which the client was previously writing, then it must
incorporate within its data any committed
write made on the source file system instance. See
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-wv" format="default"/>, which discusses
the write-verifier class. While there is no harm in not setting
this flag for a file system that turns out to be writable,
turning the flag on for a read-only file system can cause
problems for clients that select a migration or replication
target based on the flag and then find themselves unable to write.
</li>
<li>
FSLI4GF_CUR_REQ indicates that this replica is the one on which
the request is being made. Only a single server entry may
have this flag set and, in the case of a referral, no entry
will have it set. Note that this flag might be set even if the
request was made on a network access path different from any of
those specified in the current entry.
</li>
<li>
FSLI4GF_ABSENT indicates that this entry corresponds to an absent
file system replica. It can only be set if FSLI4GF_CUR_REQ is set.
When both such bits are set, it indicates that a file system
instance is not usable but that the information in the entry
can be used to determine the sorts of continuity available
when switching from this replica to other possible replicas.
Since this bit can only be true if FSLI4GF_CUR_REQ is true, the
value could be determined using the fs_status attribute, but
the information is also made available here for the
convenience of the client. An entry with this bit, since it
represents a true file system (albeit absent), does not appear
in the event of a referral, but only when a file system has
been accessed at this location and has subsequently been migrated.
</li>
<li>
<t>
FSLI4GF_GOING indicates that a replica, while still available,
should not be used further. The client, if using it, should
make an orderly transfer to another file system instance as
expeditiously as possible. It is expected that file systems
going out of service will be announced as FSLI4GF_GOING some time
before the actual loss of service. It is also expected that the
fli_valid_for value
will be sufficiently small to allow clients to detect and act
on scheduled events, while large enough that the cost of the
requests to fetch the fs_locations_info values will not be
excessive. Values on the order of ten minutes seem
reasonable.
</t>
<t>
When this flag is seen as part of a transition into a new
file system, a client might choose to transfer immediately
to another replica, or it may reference the current file system
and only transition when a migration event occurs. Similarly,
when this flag appears as a replica in the referral, clients
would likely avoid being referred to this instance whenever
there is another choice.
</t>
<t>
This flag, like the other items within fls_info, applies to the
replica rather than to a particular path to that replica. When
it appears, a transition to a new replica, rather than to a
different path to the same replica, is indicated.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
FSLI4GF_SPLIT indicates that when a transition occurs from
the current file system instance to this one, the replacement
may consist of multiple file systems. In this case, the
client has to be prepared for the possibility that objects
on the same file system before migration will be on different ones
after. Note that FSLI4GF_SPLIT is not incompatible with the
file systems belonging to the same fileid
class
since, if one has a set of fileids that are unique within
a file system, each subset assigned to a smaller file system after migration
would not have any conflicts internal to that file system.
</t>
<t>
A client, in the case of a split file system, will interrogate
existing files with which it has continuing connection (it
is free to simply forget cached filehandles). If the client
remembers the directory filehandle associated with each open
file, it may proceed upward using LOOKUPP to find the new file system
boundaries. Note that in the event of a referral, there will
not be any such files and so these actions will not be performed.
Instead, a reference to a portion of the original
file system now split off into other file systems
will encounter an fsid change and possibly a
further referral.
</t>
<t>
Once the client recognizes that one file system has been split
into two, it can prevent the disruption of running applications
by presenting the two file systems as a single
one until a convenient point to recognize the transition,
such as a restart. This would require a mapping
from the server's fsids to fsids as seen by the client, but
this is already necessary for other reasons. As noted
above, existing fileids within the two descendant file systems
will not conflict. Providing non-conflicting fileids for
newly created files on the split file systems
is the responsibility of the server (or servers working in
concert). The server can encode filehandles such
that filehandles generated before the split event can be discerned
from those generated after the split,
allowing the server to determine when the need
for emulating two file systems as one is over.
</t>
<t>
Although it is possible for this flag to be present in the
event of referral, it would generally be of little interest
to the client, since the client is not expected to have
information regarding the current contents of the absent
file system.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The transport-flag field (at byte index FSLI4BX_TFLAGS) contains
the following bits related to the transport
capabilities of the specific network path(s) specified by the
entry:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
FSLI4TF_RDMA indicates that any specified network paths
provide NFSv4.1 clients
access using an RDMA-capable transport.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Attribute continuity and file system identity information are
expressed by defining equivalence relations on the sets of
file systems presented to the client. Each such relation
is expressed as a set of file system equivalence classes.
For each relation, a file system has an 8-bit class number.
Two file systems belong to the same class if both have
identical non-zero class numbers. Zero is treated as
non-matching. Most often,
the relevant question for the client will be whether a
given replica is identical to / continuous with the current one in a
given respect, but the information should be available also as to
whether two other replicas match in that respect as well.
</t>
<t>
The following fields specify the file system's class numbers
for the equivalence relations used in determining the nature of
file system transitions. See Sections
<xref target="SEC11-trans-oview" format="counter"/>
through <xref target="SEC11-trans-server" format="counter"/>
and their various subsections
for details about how
this information is to be used. Servers may assign these values
as they wish, so long as file system instances that share the
same value have the specified relationship to one another;
conversely, file systems that have the specified relationship
to one another share a common class value. As each instance
entry is added, the relationships of this instance to previously
entered instances can be consulted, and if one is found that
bears the specified relationship, that entry's class value can
be copied to the new entry. When no such previous entry exists,
a new value for that byte index (not previously used) can be
selected, most likely by incrementing the value of the last class
value assigned for that index.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The field with byte index FSLI4BX_CLSIMUL defines the
simultaneous-use class for the file system.
</li>
<li>
The field with byte index FSLI4BX_CLHANDLE defines the handle
class for the file system.
</li>
<li>
The field with byte index FSLI4BX_CLFILEID defines the fileid
class for the file system.
</li>
<li>
The field with byte index FSLI4BX_CLWRITEVER defines the
write-verifier class for the file system.
</li>
<li>
The field with byte index FSLI4BX_CLCHANGE defines the change
class for the file system.
</li>
<li>
The field with byte index FSLI4BX_CLREADDIR defines the readdir
class for the file system.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Server-specified preference information is also provided via
8-bit values within the fls_info array. The values provide a
rank and an order (see below) to be used with separate values
specifiable for the cases of read-only and writable file
systems.
These values are compared
for different file systems to establish the server-specified
preference, with lower values indicating "more preferred".
</t>
<t>
Rank is used to express a strict server-imposed ordering on
clients, with lower values indicating "more preferred". Clients
should attempt to use all replicas with a given rank before they
use one with a higher rank. Only if all of those file systems are
unavailable should the client proceed to those of a higher rank.
Because specifying a rank will override client preferences, servers
should be conservative about using this mechanism, particularly
when the environment is one in which client communication characteristics
are neither tightly controlled nor visible to the server.
</t>
<t>
Within a rank, the order value is used to specify the server's
preference to guide the client's selection when the client's own
preferences are not controlling, with lower values of order
indicating "more preferred". If replicas are approximately equal
in all respects, clients should defer to the order specified by the
server. When clients look at server latency as part of their
selection, they are free to use this criterion, but it is suggested
that when latency differences are not significant, the
server-specified order should guide selection.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The field at byte index FSLI4BX_READRANK gives the rank value to
be used for read-only access.
</li>
<li>
The field at byte index FSLI4BX_READORDER gives the order value to
be used for read-only access.
</li>
<li>
The field at byte index FSLI4BX_WRITERANK gives the rank value to
be used for writable access.
</li>
<li>
The field at byte index FSLI4BX_WRITEORDER gives the order value to
be used for writable access.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Depending on the potential need for write access by a given client,
one of the pairs of rank and order values is used.
The read rank and order should only be used
if the client knows that only reading will ever be done or if it is
prepared to switch to a different replica in the event that any
write access capability is required in the future.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-fsli-info" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The fs_locations_info4 Structure</name>
<t>
The fs_locations_info4 structure, encoding the fs_locations_info
attribute, contains the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The fli_flags field, which contains general flags that affect
the interpretation of this fs_locations_info4 structure and
all fs_locations_item4 structures within it. The only flag
currently defined is FSLI4IF_VAR_SUB. All bits in the
fli_flags field that are not defined should always be returned as zero.
</li>
<li>
The fli_fs_root field, which contains the pathname of the root of
the current file system on the current server, just as it does
in the fs_locations4 structure.
</li>
<li>
An array called fli_items of fs_locations4_item structures, which contain
information about replicas of the current file system. Where
the current file system is actually present, or has been
present, i.e., this is not a referral situation, one of the
fs_locations_item4 structures will contain an fs_locations_server4 for
the current server. This structure will have FSLI4GF_ABSENT set
if the current file system is absent, i.e., normal access to it
will return NFS4ERR_MOVED.
</li>
<li>
The fli_valid_for field specifies a time in seconds
for which it is reasonable for a client to use the fs_locations_info attribute
without refetch. The fli_valid_for value does not provide a
guarantee of validity since servers can unexpectedly go out of
service or become inaccessible for any number of reasons.
Clients are well-advised to refetch this information for an
actively accessed file system at every fli_valid_for seconds. This
is particularly important when file system replicas may go out
of service in a controlled way using the FSLI4GF_GOING flag to
communicate an ongoing change. The server should set
fli_valid_for to a value that allows well-behaved clients to
notice the FSLI4GF_GOING flag and make an orderly switch before
the loss of service becomes effective. If this value is zero,
then no refetch interval is appropriate and the client need
not refetch this data on any particular schedule.
In the event of a transition to a new file system instance, a
new value of the fs_locations_info attribute will be fetched at
the destination. It is to be expected that this may have a
different fli_valid_for value, which the client should then use
in the same fashion as the previous value. Because a refetch
of the attribute causes information from all component entries to
be refetched, the server will typically provide a low value for
this field if any of the replicas are likely to go out of service
in a short time frame. Note that, because of the ability of the
server to return NFS4ERR_MOVED to trigger the use of different paths,
when alternate trunked paths are available, there is generally no
need to use low values of fli_valid_for in connection with the
management of alternate paths to the same replica.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The FSLI4IF_VAR_SUB flag within fli_flags controls whether variable
substitution is to be enabled. See <xref target="SEC11-fsli-item" format="default"/>
for an explanation of variable substitution.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-fsli-item" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The fs_locations_item4 Structure</name>
<t>
The fs_locations_item4 structure contains a pathname
(in the field fli_rootpath) that encodes
the path of the target file system replicas on the set of
servers designated by the included fs_locations_server4 entries.
The precise manner in which this target location
is specified depends on the value of the FSLI4IF_VAR_SUB
flag within the associated fs_locations_info4 structure.
</t>
<t>
If this flag is not set, then fli_rootpath simply designates
the location of the target file system within each server's
single-server namespace just as it does for the rootpath
within the fs_location4 structure. When this bit is set,
however, component entries of a certain form are subject
to client-specific variable substitution so as to allow
a degree of namespace non-uniformity in order to accommodate
the selection of client-specific file system targets to
adapt to different client architectures or other
characteristics.
</t>
<t>
When such substitution is in effect, a variable beginning
with the string "${" and ending with the string "}"
and containing a colon is to be
replaced by the client-specific value associated with
that variable. The string "unknown" should be used
by the client when it has no value for such a variable.
The pathname resulting from such
substitutions is used to designate the target file system,
so that different clients may have different file systems,
corresponding to that location in the multi-server namespace.
</t>
<t>
As mentioned above, such substituted pathname variables
contain a colon. The part before the colon is to be a
DNS domain name, and the part after is to be a case-insensitive
alphanumeric string.
</t>
<t>
Where the domain is "ietf.org", only variable names defined
in this document or subsequent Standards Track RFCs
are subject to such substitution. Organizations are
free to use their domain names to create their own sets
of client-specific variables, to be subject to such
substitution. In cases where such variables are intended
to be used more broadly than a single organization,
publication of an Informational RFC defining such variables
is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>.
</t>
<t>
The variable ${ietf.org:CPU_ARCH} is used to denote that the
CPU architecture object files are compiled. This specification
does not limit the acceptable values (except that they must be
valid UTF-8 strings), but such values as "x86", "x86_64", and "sparc"
would be expected to be used in line with industry practice.
</t>
<t>
The variable ${ietf.org:OS_TYPE} is used to denote the
operating system, and thus the kernel and library APIs,
for which code might be compiled. This specification does
not limit the acceptable values (except that they must be
valid UTF-8 strings), but such values as "linux" and "freebsd"
would be expected to be used in line with industry practice.
</t>
<t>
The variable ${ietf.org:OS_VERSION} is used to denote the
operating system version, and thus the specific details
of versioned interfaces,
for which code might be compiled. This specification does
not limit the acceptable values (except that they must be
valid UTF-8 strings). However, combinations of numbers and
letters with interspersed dots would be expected to be used
in line with industry practice, with the details of the
version format depending on the specific value of
the variable ${ietf.org:OS_TYPE} with which
it is used.
</t>
<t>
Use of these variables could result in the direction of different
clients to different file systems on the same server, as
appropriate to particular clients. In cases in which the
target file systems are located on different servers, a single
server could serve as a referral point so that each valid
combination of variable values would designate a referral
hosted on a single server, with the targets of those referrals on
a number of different servers.
</t>
<t>
Because namespace administration is affected by the values
selected to substitute for various variables, clients should
provide convenient means of determining what variable
substitutions a client will implement, as well as, where
appropriate, providing means to control the substitutions to
be used. The exact means by which this will be done is
outside the scope of this specification.
</t>
<t>
Although variable substitution is most suitable for use
in the context of referrals, it may be used in the context
of replication and migration. If it is used in these contexts,
the server must ensure that no matter what values the
client presents for the substituted variables, the result
is always a valid successor file system instance to that
from which a transition is occurring, i.e., that the data is
identical or represents a later image of a writable file
system.
</t>
<t>
Note that when fli_rootpath is a null pathname (that is, one
with zero components), the file system designated is at the
root of the specified server, whether or not the FSLI4IF_VAR_SUB
flag within the associated fs_locations_info4 structure is
set.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="fs_status" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The Attribute fs_status</name>
<t>
In an environment in which multiple copies of the same basic set of
data are available, information regarding the particular source of
such data and the relationships among different copies can be very
helpful in providing consistent data to applications.
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum fs4_status_type {
STATUS4_FIXED = 1,
STATUS4_UPDATED = 2,
STATUS4_VERSIONED = 3,
STATUS4_WRITABLE = 4,
STATUS4_REFERRAL = 5
};
struct fs4_status {
bool fss_absent;
fs4_status_type fss_type;
utf8str_cs fss_source;
utf8str_cs fss_current;
int32_t fss_age;
nfstime4 fss_version;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The boolean fss_absent indicates whether the file system is
currently absent. This value will be set if the file system was
previously present and becomes absent, or if the file system has
never been present and the type is STATUS4_REFERRAL. When this
boolean is set and the type is not STATUS4_REFERRAL, the
remaining information in the fs4_status reflects that last valid
when the file system was present.
</t>
<t>
The fss_type field indicates the kind of file system image represented.
This is of particular importance when using the version values to
determine appropriate succession of file system images.
When fss_absent is set, and the file system was previously
present, the value of fss_type reflected is that when the file was last present.
Five values are distinguished:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
STATUS4_FIXED, which indicates a read-only image in the sense
that it will never change. The possibility is allowed that, as
a result of migration or switch to a different image, changed
data can be accessed, but within the confines of this instance,
no change is allowed. The client can use this fact to
cache aggressively.
</li>
<li>
STATUS4_VERSIONED, which indicates that the image, like the
STATUS4_UPDATED case, is updated externally, but it provides
a guarantee that the server will carefully update an
associated version value so that the client can
protect itself from a situation in which it reads
data from one version of the file system and then later reads
data from an earlier version of the same file system. See
below for a discussion of how this can be done.
</li>
<li>
STATUS4_UPDATED, which indicates an image that cannot be
updated by the user writing to it but that may be changed
externally, typically because it is a periodically updated
copy of another writable file system somewhere else. In
this case, version information is not provided, and the
client does not have the responsibility of making sure
that this version only advances upon a file system instance
transition. In this case, it is the responsibility of the
server to make sure that the data presented after a file
system instance transition is a proper successor image and
includes all changes seen by the client and any change made
before all such changes.
</li>
<li>
STATUS4_WRITABLE, which indicates that the file system is an
actual writable one. The client need not, of course, actually
write to the file system, but once it does, it should not
accept a transition to anything other than a writable instance
of that same file system.
</li>
<li>
STATUS4_REFERRAL, which indicates that the file system in
question is absent and has never been present on this
server.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that in the STATUS4_UPDATED and STATUS4_VERSIONED cases, the
server is responsible for the appropriate handling of locks that
are inconsistent with external changes to delegations.
If a server gives out delegations, they <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be recalled
before an inconsistent change is made to the data, and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be revoked if this is not possible. Similarly, if an OPEN is
inconsistent with data that is changed (the OPEN has
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE/OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH
and the data is changed), that OPEN <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be considered
administratively revoked.
</t>
<t>
The opaque strings fss_source and fss_current provide a way of presenting
information about the source of the file system image being present.
It is not intended that the client do anything with this information
other than make it available to administrative tools. It is
intended that this information be helpful when researching possible
problems with a file system image that might arise when it is
unclear if the correct image is being accessed and, if not, how that
image came to be made. This kind of diagnostic information will be
helpful, if, as seems likely, copies of file systems are made in
many different ways (e.g., simple user-level copies,
file-system-level point-in-time copies,
clones of the underlying storage),
under a variety of administrative arrangements. In such
environments, determining how a given set of data was constructed
can be very helpful in resolving problems.
</t>
<t>
The opaque string fss_source is used to indicate the source of a
given file system with the expectation that tools capable of
creating a file system image propagate this information, when
possible. It is understood that this may not always be possible
since a user-level copy may be thought of as creating a new data
set and the tools used may have no mechanism to propagate this
data. When a file system is initially created, it is desirable
to associate with it
data regarding how the file system was created, where it was
created, who created it, etc. Making this information available
in this attribute in a human-readable
string will be helpful for applications and
system administrators and will also serve to make it available when
the original file system is used to make subsequent copies.
</t>
<t>
The opaque string fss_current should provide whatever information is
available about the source of the current copy. Such
information includes
the tool creating it, any relevant parameters to that tool, the
time at which the copy was done, the user making the change, the
server on which the change was made, etc. All information should be
in a human-readable string.
</t>
<t>
The field fss_age provides an indication of how out-of-date the file system
currently is with respect to its ultimate data source (in case of
cascading data updates). This complements the fls_currency field of
fs_locations_server4 (see <xref target="SEC11-li-new" format="default"/>) in the
following way: the information in fls_currency
gives a bound for how out of date the data in a file system might
typically get, while the value in fss_age gives a bound on how out-of-date that
data actually is. Negative values imply that no information is
available. A zero means that this data is known to be current.
A positive value means that this data is known to be no older than
that number of seconds with respect to the ultimate data source.
Using this value, the client may be able to decide that a data copy
is too old, so that it may search for a newer version to use.
</t>
<t>
The fss_version field provides a version identification, in the form of
a time value, such that successive versions always have later time
values. When the fs_type is anything other than
STATUS4_VERSIONED, the server may provide such a value, but there is
no guarantee as to its validity and clients will not use it except
to provide additional information to add to fss_source and fss_current.
</t>
<t>
When fss_type is STATUS4_VERSIONED, servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> provide a value
of fss_version that progresses monotonically whenever any new version
of the data is established. This allows the client, if reliable
image progression is important to it, to fetch this attribute as
part of each COMPOUND where data or metadata from the file system is
used.
</t>
<t>
When it is important to the client to make sure that only valid
successor images are accepted, it must make sure that it does not
read data or metadata from the file system without updating its
sense of the current state of the image. This is to avoid the possibility
that the fs_status that the client holds will be one for an
earlier image, which would cause the client to accept a new file
system instance that is later than that but still earlier than
the updated data read by the client.
</t>
<t>
In order to accept valid images reliably, the client must do a GETATTR of the fs_status
attribute that follows any interrogation of data or metadata within the
file system in question. Often this is most conveniently done by
appending such a GETATTR after all other operations that reference
a given file system. When errors occur between reading file system
data and performing such a GETATTR, care must be exercised to make
sure that the data in question is not used before obtaining the
proper fs_status value. In this connection, when an OPEN is done
within such a versioned file system and the associated GETATTR of
fs_status is not successfully completed, the open file in question
must not be accessed until that fs_status is fetched.
</t>
<t>
The procedure above will ensure that before using any data from the
file system the client has in hand a newly-fetched current version
of the file system image. Multiple values for multiple requests in
flight can be resolved by assembling them into the required partial
order (and the elements should form a total order within the
partial order) and
using the last.
The client may then, when switching among
file system instances, decline to use an instance that does not have
an fss_type of STATUS4_VERSIONED or whose fss_version field is earlier than the
last one obtained from the predecessor file system instance.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="pnfs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Parallel NFS (pNFS)</name>
<section anchor="pnfs_intro" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Introduction</name>
<t>
pNFS is an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> feature within NFSv4.1; the pNFS feature
set allows direct client access to the storage devices containing
file data. When file data for a single NFSv4 server is stored on
multiple and/or higher-throughput storage devices (by comparison to
the server's throughput capability), the result can be significantly
better file access performance. The relationship among multiple
clients, a single server, and multiple storage devices for pNFS
(server and clients have access to all storage devices) is shown in
<xref target="fig_system" format="default"/>.
</t>
<figure anchor="fig_system">
<artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
+-----------+
|+-----------+ +-----------+
||+-----------+ | |
||| | NFSv4.1 + pNFS | |
+|| Clients |<------------------------------>| Server |
+| | | |
+-----------+ | |
||| +-----------+
||| |
||| |
||| Storage +-----------+ |
||| Protocol |+-----------+ |
||+----------------||+-----------+ Control |
|+-----------------||| | Protocol|
+------------------+|| Storage |------------+
+| Devices |
+-----------+
]]></artwork>
</figure>
<t>
In this model, the clients, server, and storage devices are
responsible for managing file access. This is in contrast to NFSv4
without pNFS, where it is primarily the server's responsibility; some
of this responsibility may be delegated to the client under strictly
specified conditions. See <xref target="storage_protocol" format="default"/>
for a discussion of the Storage Protocol. See <xref target="control_protocol" format="default"/> for a
discussion of the Control Protocol.
</t>
<t>
pNFS takes the form of <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> operations that manage protocol
objects called 'layouts' (<xref target="layout_types" format="default"/>) that
contain a byte-range and storage location information. The layout
is managed in a similar fashion
as NFSv4.1 data delegations. For example, the layout is leased,
recallable, and revocable. However, layouts are distinct abstractions
and are manipulated with new operations. When a client holds a
layout, it is granted the ability to directly access the byte-range
at the storage location specified in the layout.
</t>
<t>
There are interactions between layouts and other NFSv4.1
abstractions such as data delegations and byte-range locking.
Delegation issues are discussed in <xref target="recalling_layout" format="default"/>. Byte-range locking issues are
discussed in Sections <xref target="layout_iomode" format="counter"/> and <xref target="layout_semantics" format="counter"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>pNFS Definitions</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1's pNFS feature provides parallel data access to a
file system that stripes its content across multiple
storage servers. The first instantiation of pNFS, as
part of NFSv4.1, separates the file system protocol
processing into two parts: metadata processing and data
processing. Data consist of the contents of regular
files that are striped across storage servers. Data
striping occurs in at least two ways: on a file-by-file
basis and, within sufficiently large files, on a
block-by-block basis. In contrast, striped access to
metadata by pNFS clients is not provided in NFSv4.1, even
though the file system back end of a pNFS server might
stripe metadata. Metadata consist of everything else,
including the contents of non-regular files (e.g.,
directories); see <xref target="metadata" format="default"/>. The
metadata functionality is implemented by an NFSv4.1
server that supports pNFS and the operations described in
<xref target="nfsv41operations" format="default"/>; such a server is
called a metadata server (<xref target="mds" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The data functionality is implemented by one or more storage devices, each of which
are accessed by the client via a storage protocol. A subset (defined in <xref target="ds_ops" format="default"/>) of NFSv4.1 is one such storage protocol. New terms are
introduced to the NFSv4.1 nomenclature and existing terms are
clarified to allow for the description of the pNFS feature.
</t>
<section anchor="metadata" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Metadata</name>
<t>
Information about a file system object, such as its name, location
within the namespace, owner, ACL, and other attributes. Metadata may
also include storage location information, and this will vary based
on the underlying storage mechanism that is used.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="mds" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Metadata Server</name>
<t>
An NFSv4.1 server that supports the pNFS feature. A variety of
architectural choices exist for the metadata server and its use of
file system information held at the server. Some servers may
contain metadata only for file objects residing at the
metadata server, while the file data resides on associated storage
devices. Other metadata servers may hold both metadata and a
varying degree of file data.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>pNFS Client</name>
<t>
An NFSv4.1 client that supports pNFS operations and supports at
least one storage protocol for performing I/O
to storage devices.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Storage Device</name>
<t>
A storage device stores a regular file's data, but leaves metadata
management to the metadata server. A storage device could be
another NFSv4.1 server, an object-based storage device (OSD),
a block
device accessed over a System Area Network (SAN, e.g., either
FiberChannel or iSCSI SAN), or some other entity.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="storage_protocol" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Storage Protocol</name>
<t>
As noted in <xref target="fig_system" format="default"/>,
the storage protocol is the method used by the client to
store and retrieve data directly from the storage devices.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 pNFS feature has been structured to allow for a variety
of storage protocols to be defined and used.
One example storage protocol is NFSv4.1 itself (as documented in
<xref target="file_layout_type" format="default"/>). Other options for the storage protocol
are described elsewhere and include:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Block/volume protocols such as Internet SCSI (iSCSI)
<xref target="RFC3720" format="default"/> and FCP <xref target="FCP-2" format="default"/>. The block/volume
protocol support can be independent of the addressing structure
of the block/volume protocol used, allowing more than one
protocol to access the same file data and enabling extensibility
to other block/volume protocols. See
<xref target="RFC5663" format="default"/> for a layout
specification that
allows pNFS to use block/volume storage protocols.
</li>
<li>
Object protocols such as OSD over iSCSI or Fibre Channel <xref target="OSD-T10" format="default"/>. See
<xref target="RFC5664" format="default"/> for a layout specification
that allows pNFS to use object storage protocols.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
It is possible that various storage protocols are available to
both client and server and it may be possible that a client and
server do not have a matching storage protocol available to them.
Because of this, the pNFS server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support normal NFSv4.1 access
to any file accessible by the pNFS feature; this will allow for
continued interoperability between an NFSv4.1 client and server.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="control_protocol" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Control Protocol</name>
<t>
As noted in <xref target="fig_system" format="default"/>,
the control protocol is used by the exported file system between the
metadata server and storage devices. Specification of such
protocols is outside the scope of the NFSv4.1 protocol. Such
control protocols would be used to control activities such as the
allocation and deallocation of storage, the management of state
required by the storage devices to perform client access control,
and, depending on the storage protocol, the enforcement of
authentication and authorization so that restrictions that
would be enforced by the metadata server are also enforced by
the storage device.
</t>
<t>
A particular control protocol is not <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> by NFSv4.1 but
requirements are placed on the control protocol for maintaining
attributes like modify time, the change attribute, and the end-of-file
(EOF) position. Note that if pNFS is layered over a clustered, parallel
file system (e.g., <xref target="PVFS" format="default">PVFS</xref>), the mechanisms that
enable clustering and parallelism in that file system can be considered
the control protocol.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="layout_types" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout Types</name>
<t>
A layout describes the mapping of a file's data to the storage
devices that hold the data. A layout is said to belong to a
specific layout type (data type layouttype4, see <xref target="layouttype4" format="default"/>). The layout type allows for variants to
handle different storage protocols, such as those associated with
block/volume <xref target="RFC5663" format="default"/>, object <xref target="RFC5664" format="default"/>, and file (<xref target="file_layout_type" format="default"/>) layout types. A metadata server, along with its control
protocol, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support at least one layout type. A private
sub-range of the layout type namespace is also defined. Values from
the private layout type range <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used for internal testing or
experimentation (see <xref target="layouttype4" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
As an example, the organization of the file layout type could be
an array of tuples (e.g., device ID, filehandle), along with a
definition of how the data is
stored across the devices (e.g., striping). A block/volume layout
might be an array of tuples that store &lt;device ID, block number,
block count&gt;
along with information about block size and the
associated file offset of the block number. An object layout might
be an array of tuples &lt;device ID, object ID&gt; and an additional
structure (i.e., the aggregation map) that defines how the logical
byte sequence of the file data is serialized into the different
objects. Note that the actual layouts are typically more complex
than these simple expository examples.
</t>
<t>
Requests for pNFS-related operations will often specify a layout
type. Examples of such operations are GETDEVICEINFO and LAYOUTGET.
The response for these operations will include structures such
as a device_addr4 or a layout4, each of which includes a layout type within
it. The layout type sent by the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> always be the same
one requested by the client. When a server sends a response that
includes a different layout type, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> ignore the
response and behave as if the server had returned an error response.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="layout" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout</name>
<t>
A layout defines how a file's data is organized on one or more
storage devices. There are many potential layout types; each of the
layout types are differentiated by the storage protocol used to
access data and by the aggregation scheme that lays out the file
data on the underlying storage devices. A layout is precisely
identified by the tuple &lt;client ID, filehandle, layout
type, iomode, range&gt;, where filehandle refers to the filehandle
of the file on the metadata server.
</t>
<t>
It is important to define when layouts overlap and/or conflict with
each other. For two layouts with overlapping byte-ranges to
actually overlap each other, both layouts must be of the same layout
type, correspond to the same filehandle, and have the same iomode.
Layouts conflict when they overlap and differ in the content of the
layout (i.e., the storage device/file mapping parameters differ).
Note that differing iomodes do not lead to conflicting layouts. It
is permissible for layouts with different iomodes, pertaining to the
same byte-range, to be held by the same client. An example of this
would be copy-on-write functionality for a block/volume layout type.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="layout_iomode" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout Iomode</name>
<t>
The layout iomode (data type layoutiomode4, see <xref target="layoutiomode4" format="default"/>) indicates to the metadata server the
client's intent to perform either just READ operations
or a mixture containing READ
and WRITE operations. For certain layout
types, it is useful for a client to specify this intent at the time it sends LAYOUTGET
(<xref target="OP_LAYOUTGET" format="default"/>). For example, for
block/volume-based protocols, block allocation could occur when a
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW iomode is specified. A special LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY iomode is defined
and can only be used for LAYOUTRETURN and CB_LAYOUTRECALL, not for
LAYOUTGET. It specifies that layouts pertaining to both LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ and
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW iomodes are being returned or recalled, respectively.
</t>
<t>
A storage device may validate I/O with regard to the iomode; this
is dependent upon storage device implementation and layout type.
Thus, if the client's layout iomode is inconsistent with the I/O
being performed, the storage device may reject the client's I/O with
an error indicating that a new layout with the correct iomode should be
obtained via LAYOUTGET. For example, if a client gets a layout with a LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ iomode and
performs a WRITE to a storage device, the storage device is allowed
to reject that WRITE.
</t>
<t>
The use of the layout iomode does not conflict with OPEN share modes or byte-range LOCK operations;
open share mode and byte-range lock conflicts are enforced as they are without the
use of pNFS and are logically separate from the pNFS layout level.
Open share modes and byte-range locks are the preferred method for
restricting user access to data files. For example, an OPEN of
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE does not conflict with a LAYOUTGET containing an iomode
of LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW performed by another client. Applications that depend
on writing into the same file concurrently may use byte-range locking to
serialize their accesses.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="device_ids" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Device IDs</name>
<t>
The device ID (data type deviceid4, see
<xref target="deviceid4" format="default"/>) identifies a group of storage devices. The scope
of a device ID is the pair &lt;client ID, layout type&gt;. In practice, a
significant amount of information may be required to fully address
a storage device. Rather than embedding all such information in a
layout, layouts embed device IDs. The NFSv4.1 operation
GETDEVICEINFO (<xref target="OP_GETDEVICEINFO" format="default"/>) is used to
retrieve the complete address information (including
all device addresses for the device ID) regarding the storage
device according to its layout type and device ID. For example,
the address of an NFSv4.1 data server or of an object-based storage
device could be an IP address and port. The address of a block
storage device could be a volume label.
</t>
<t>
Clients cannot expect the mapping between a device ID and
its storage device address(es) to persist across metadata server restart.
See <xref target="mds_recovery" format="default"/> for a description of how
recovery works in that situation.
</t>
<t>
A device ID lives as long as there is a layout
referring to the device ID. If there are no layouts
referring to the device ID, the server is free to
delete the device ID any time.
Once a device ID is deleted by the server, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
reuse the device ID for the same layout type and client ID again.
This requirement is feasible because the device ID is 16 bytes
long, leaving sufficient room to store a generation number if the
server's implementation requires most of the rest of the device ID's
content to be reused. This requirement is necessary because
otherwise the race conditions between asynchronous notification
of device ID addition and deletion would be too difficult to
sort out.
</t>
<t>
Device ID to device address mappings are not leased,
and can be changed at any time. (Note that while
device ID to device address mappings are likely
to change after the metadata server restarts, the
server is not required to change the mappings.)
A server has two
choices for changing mappings. It can recall all
layouts referring to the device ID or it can use a
notification mechanism.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol has no optimal way to recall
all layouts that referred to a particular device ID
(unless the server associates a single device ID with
a single fsid or a single client ID; in which case,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL has options for recalling all layouts
associated with the fsid, client ID pair, or just the
client ID).
</t>
<t>
Via a notification mechanism
(see <xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" format="default"/>),
device ID to device address mappings can change over the duration
of server operation without recalling or revoking the layouts that
refer to device ID. The notification mechanism can also delete
a device ID, but only if the client has no layouts referring
to the device ID.
A notification of a change to a device ID to device address
mapping will immediately or eventually invalidate some or all of
the device ID's mappings.
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support notifications and the client must
request them before they can be used. For further information
about the notification types, see <xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="pnfs_ops" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>pNFS Operations</name>
<t>
NFSv4.1 has several operations that are needed for
pNFS servers, regardless of layout type or storage
protocol. These operations are all sent to a metadata
server and summarized here. While pNFS is an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>
feature, if pNFS is implemented, some operations
are <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> in order to comply with pNFS. See <xref target="operation_mandlist" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
These are the fore channel pNFS operations:
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>GETDEVICEINFO</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_GETDEVICEINFO" format="default"/>), as noted previously
(<xref target="device_ids" format="default"/>), returns the mapping of device ID to
storage device address.
</dd>
<dt>GETDEVICELIST</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_GETDEVICELIST" format="default"/>)
allows clients to fetch all device IDs
for a specific file system.
</dd>
<dt>LAYOUTGET</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_LAYOUTGET" format="default"/>) is used by a client to get
a layout for a file.
</dd>
<dt>LAYOUTCOMMIT</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT" format="default"/>) is used
to inform the metadata server of the client's intent to commit data
that has been written to the storage device (the storage device as
originally indicated in the return value of LAYOUTGET).
</dd>
<dt>LAYOUTRETURN</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_LAYOUTRETURN" format="default"/>) is used
to return layouts for a file, a file system ID (FSID), or a client ID.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
These are the backchannel pNFS operations:
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>CB_LAYOUTRECALL</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL" format="default"/>) recalls
a layout, all layouts belonging to a file system, or all
layouts belonging to a client ID.
</dd>
<dt>CB_RECALL_ANY</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY" format="default"/>)
tells a client that it needs to return some number of recallable
objects, including layouts, to the metadata server.
</dd>
<dt>CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL" format="default"/>) tells a client
that a recallable object that it was denied (in case of
pNFS, a layout denied by LAYOUTGET) due to resource exhaustion
is now available.
</dd>
<dt>CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID</dt>
<dd>
(<xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" format="default"/>) notifies the client of
changes to device IDs.
</dd>
</dl>
</section>
<section anchor="pnfs_attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>pNFS Attributes</name>
<t>
A number of attributes specific to pNFS are listed and described in
<xref target="pnfs_attr_full" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout Semantics</name>
<section anchor="layout_semantics" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Guarantees Provided by Layouts</name>
<t>
Layouts grant to the client the ability to access data located at
a storage device with the appropriate storage protocol. The client
is guaranteed the layout will be recalled when one of two things
occur: either a conflicting layout is requested or the state
encapsulated by the layout becomes invalid (this can happen when
an event directly or indirectly modifies the layout). When a layout
is recalled and returned by the client, the client continues with
the ability to access file data with normal NFSv4.1 operations
through the metadata server. Only the ability to access the storage
devices is affected.
</t>
<t>
The requirement of NFSv4.1 that all user access rights <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
obtained through the appropriate OPEN, LOCK, and ACCESS operations
is not modified with the existence of layouts. Layouts are provided
to NFSv4.1 clients, and user access still follows the rules of the
protocol as if they did not exist. It is a requirement that for a
client to access a storage device, a layout must be held by the
client. If a storage device receives an I/O request for a byte-range for
which the client does not hold a layout, the storage device <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
reject that I/O request. Note that the act of modifying a file for
which a layout is held does not necessarily conflict with the
holding of the layout that describes the file being modified.
Therefore, it is the requirement of the storage protocol or layout
type that determines the necessary behavior. For example,
block/volume layout types require that the layout's
iomode agree with the type of I/O being performed.
</t>
<t>
Depending upon the layout type and storage protocol in use, storage
device access permissions may be granted by LAYOUTGET and may be
encoded within the type-specific layout. For an example of storage
device access permissions, see an object-based protocol such as <xref target="OSD-T10" format="default"/>. If access permissions are encoded within the
layout, the metadata server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> recall the layout when those
permissions become invalid for any reason -- for example, when a file
becomes unwritable or inaccessible to a client. Note, clients are
still required to perform the appropriate
OPEN, LOCK, and ACCESS operations as described above. The degree to which it is
possible for the client to circumvent these operations and
the consequences of doing so must be clearly specified by the
individual layout type specifications. In addition, these
specifications must be clear about the requirements and
non-requirements for the checking performed by the server.
</t>
<t>
In the presence of pNFS functionality, mandatory byte-range locks <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
behave as they would without pNFS. Therefore, if mandatory file
locks and layouts are provided simultaneously, the storage device
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be able to enforce the mandatory byte-range locks. For example, if
one client obtains a mandatory byte-range lock and a second client accesses the
storage device, the storage device <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> appropriately restrict I/O
for the range of the mandatory byte-range lock. If the storage
device is incapable of providing this check in the presence of
mandatory byte-range locks, then the metadata server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> grant
layouts and mandatory byte-range locks simultaneously.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="obtaining_layout" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Getting a Layout</name>
<t>
A client obtains a layout with the
LAYOUTGET operation. The metadata server
will grant layouts of a particular type
(e.g., block/volume, object, or file).
The client selects an appropriate layout
type that the server supports and the client
is prepared to use. The layout returned to
the client might not exactly match the
requested byte-range as described in <xref target="OP_LAYOUTGET_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>. As needed a client
may send multiple LAYOUTGET operations; these might result
in multiple overlapping, non-conflicting layouts (see
<xref target="layout" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
In order to get a layout, the client must first have opened the file
via the OPEN operation. When a client has no layout on a file, it
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> present an open stateid, a delegation stateid, or
a byte-range lock stateid in the loga_stateid argument. A successful
LAYOUTGET result includes a layout stateid. The first successful
LAYOUTGET processed by the server using a non-layout stateid as an
argument <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have the "seqid" field of the layout stateid in the
response set to one. Thereafter, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use a layout
stateid (see <xref target="layout_stateid" format="default"/>) on future invocations
of LAYOUTGET on the file, and the "seqid" <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be set to
zero. Once the layout has been retrieved, it can be held across
multiple OPEN and CLOSE sequences. Therefore, a client may hold a
layout for a file that is not currently open by any user on the
client. This allows for the caching of layouts beyond CLOSE.
</t>
<t>
The storage protocol used by the client to access the data on the
storage device is determined by the layout's type. The client is
responsible for matching the layout type with an available method to
interpret and use the layout. The method for this layout type
selection is outside the scope of the pNFS functionality.
</t>
<t>
Although the metadata server is in control
of the layout for a file, the pNFS client
can provide hints to the server when a file
is opened or created about the preferred
layout type and aggregation schemes.
pNFS introduces a layout_hint attribute (<xref target="attrdef_layout_hint" format="default"/>)
that the client can set at file creation
time to provide a hint to the server for new
files. Setting this attribute separately,
after the file has been created might make
it difficult, or impossible, for the server
implementation to comply.
</t>
<t>
Because the EXCLUSIVE4 createmode4 does not allow the
setting of attributes at file creation time, NFSv4.1
introduces the EXCLUSIVE4_1 createmode4, which does
allow attributes to be set at file creation time. In
addition, if the session is created with persistent
reply caches, EXCLUSIVE4_1 is neither necessary
nor allowed. Instead, GUARDED4 both works better and is
prescribed. <xref target="exclusive_create" format="default"/> in <xref target="OP_OPEN_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/> summarizes how a client
is allowed to send an exclusive create.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="layout_stateid" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout Stateid</name>
<t>
As with all other stateids, the layout stateid consists of a "seqid" and
"other" field. Once a layout stateid is established, the "other" field
will stay constant unless the stateid is revoked or the client
returns all layouts on the file and the server disposes of the
stateid. The "seqid" field is initially set to one, and is never
zero on any NFSv4.1 operation that uses layout stateids, whether it
is a fore channel or backchannel operation. After the layout stateid
is established, the server increments by one the value of the
"seqid" in each subsequent LAYOUTGET and LAYOUTRETURN response, and
in each CB_LAYOUTRECALL request.
</t>
<t>
Given the design goal of pNFS to provide parallelism, the layout
stateid differs from other stateid types in that the client is
expected to send LAYOUTGET and LAYOUTRETURN operations in parallel.
The "seqid" value is used by the client to properly sort responses
to LAYOUTGET and LAYOUTRETURN. The "seqid" is also used to prevent
race conditions between LAYOUTGET and CB_LAYOUTRECALL. Given that the
processing rules differ from layout stateids and other stateid
types, only the pNFS sections of this document should be considered
to determine proper layout stateid handling.
</t>
<t>
Once the client receives a layout stateid, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the correct
"seqid" for subsequent LAYOUTGET or LAYOUTRETURN operations. The
correct "seqid" is defined as the highest "seqid" value from
responses of fully processed LAYOUTGET or LAYOUTRETURN operations or
arguments of a fully processed CB_LAYOUTRECALL operation. Since the
server is incrementing the "seqid" value on each layout operation,
the client may determine the order of operation processing by
inspecting the "seqid" value. In the case of overlapping layout
ranges, the ordering information will provide the client the
knowledge of which layout ranges are held. Note that overlapping
layout ranges may occur because of the client's specific requests or
because the server is allowed to expand the range of a requested
layout and notify the client in the LAYOUTRETURN results. Additional
layout stateid sequencing requirements are provided in
<xref target="pnfs_operation_sequencing" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
The client's receipt of a "seqid" is not sufficient for subsequent
use. The client must fully process the operations before the
"seqid" can be used. For LAYOUTGET results, if
the client is not using the forgetful model
(<xref target="recall_robustness" format="default"/>), it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> first update its
record of what ranges of the file's layout it has before using the
seqid. For LAYOUTRETURN results, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> delete the range
from its record of what ranges of the file's layout it had before
using the seqid. For CB_LAYOUTRECALL arguments, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send
a response to the recall before using the seqid.
The fundamental requirement in client
processing is that the "seqid" is used to provide the order of
processing. LAYOUTGET results may be processed in parallel.
LAYOUTRETURN results may be processed in parallel. LAYOUTGET and
LAYOUTRETURN responses may be processed in parallel as long as the
ranges do not overlap. CB_LAYOUTRECALL request processing <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
processed in "seqid" order at all times.
</t>
<t>
Once a client has no more layouts on a file, the layout stateid is
no longer valid and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used. Any attempt to use such a
layout stateid will result in NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="committing_layout" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Committing a Layout</name>
<t>
Allowing for varying storage protocol capabilities, the pNFS
protocol does not require the metadata server and storage devices to
have a consistent view of file attributes and data location
mappings. Data location mapping refers to aspects such as which offsets
store data as opposed to storing holes (see <xref target="sparse_dense" format="default"/> for a discussion). Related issues arise
for storage protocols where a layout may hold provisionally
allocated blocks where the allocation of those blocks does not
survive a complete restart of both the client and server. Because
of this inconsistency, it is necessary to resynchronize the client
with the metadata server and its storage devices and make any
potential changes available to other clients. This is accomplished
by use of the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation.
</t>
<t>
The LAYOUTCOMMIT operation is responsible for committing a modified
layout to the metadata server. The data should be written
and committed to the appropriate storage devices before the
LAYOUTCOMMIT occurs. The
scope of the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation depends on the storage protocol
in use. It is important to note that the level of
synchronization is from the point of view of the client that sent
the LAYOUTCOMMIT. The updated state on the metadata server need
only reflect the state as of the client's last operation previous to
the LAYOUTCOMMIT. The metadata server is not <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> to maintain a global view
that accounts for other clients' I/O that may have occurred within
the same time frame.
</t>
<t>
For block/volume-based layouts, LAYOUTCOMMIT may require
updating the block list that comprises the file and committing this
layout to stable storage. For file-based layouts, synchronization of
attributes between the metadata and storage devices, primarily the
size attribute, is required.
</t>
<t>
The control protocol is free to synchronize the attributes before
it receives a LAYOUTCOMMIT; however, upon successful completion of a
LAYOUTCOMMIT, state that exists on the metadata server that
describes the file <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be synchronized with the state that exists on the
storage devices that comprise that file as of the client's
last sent operation. Thus, a client that queries the size of a file
between a WRITE to a storage device and the LAYOUTCOMMIT might observe
a size that does not reflect the actual data written.
</t>
<t>
The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have a layout in order to send a LAYOUTCOMMIT operation.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>LAYOUTCOMMIT and change/time_modify</name>
<t>
The change and time_modify attributes may be updated
by the server when the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation is processed. The
reason for this is that some layout types do not support the update
of these attributes when the storage devices process I/O operations.
If a client has a layout with the LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW iomode on the file,
the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> provide a suggested value to the server for
time_modify within the arguments to LAYOUTCOMMIT.
Based on the layout type, the provided value may or may not be used.
The server should sanity-check the client-provided values
before they are used. For example, the server should ensure that
time does not flow backwards. The client always has the option to
set time_modify through an explicit SETATTR operation.
</t>
<t>
For some layout protocols, the storage device is able to notify the
metadata server of the occurrence of an I/O; as a result, the
change and time_modify attributes may be updated at
the metadata server. For a metadata server that is capable of
monitoring updates to the change and time_modify
attributes, LAYOUTCOMMIT processing is not required to update the
change attribute. In this case, the metadata server must ensure that
no further update to the data has occurred since the last update of
the attributes; file-based protocols may have enough information to
make this determination or may update the change attribute upon each
file modification. This also applies for the time_modify
attribute. If the server implementation is able to
determine that the file has not been modified since the last
time_modify update, the server need not update time_modify at
LAYOUTCOMMIT. At LAYOUTCOMMIT completion, the updated attributes
should be visible if that file was modified since the latest
previous LAYOUTCOMMIT or LAYOUTGET.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="general_layoutcommit" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>LAYOUTCOMMIT and size</name>
<t>
The size of a file may be updated when the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation is
used by the client. One of the fields in the argument to
LAYOUTCOMMIT is loca_last_write_offset; this field indicates the
highest byte offset written but not yet committed with the
LAYOUTCOMMIT operation. The data type of loca_last_write_offset is
newoffset4 and is switched on a boolean value, no_newoffset, that
indicates if a previous write occurred or not. If no_newoffset is
FALSE, an offset is not given. If the client has a layout with
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW iomode on the file, with a byte-range (denoted by the values of lo_offset and lo_length)
that overlaps loca_last_write_offset, then the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
set no_newoffset to TRUE and provide an offset that will
update the file size. Keep in mind that offset is not the same
as length, though they are related. For example, a loca_last_write_offset
value of zero means that one byte was written at offset zero, and so
the length of the file is at least one byte.
</t>
<t>
The metadata server may do one of the following:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Update the file's size using the last write offset provided by
the client as either the true file size or as a hint of the file
size. If the metadata server has a method available, any new
value for file size should be sanity-checked. For example, the
file must not be truncated if the client presents a last write
offset less than the file's current size.
</li>
<li>
Ignore the client-provided last write offset; the metadata
server must have sufficient knowledge from other sources to
determine the file's size. For example, the metadata server
queries the storage devices with the control protocol.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
The method chosen to update the file's size will depend on the
storage device's and/or the control protocol's capabilities. For
example, if the storage devices are block devices with no knowledge
of file size, the metadata server must rely on the client to set the
last write offset appropriately.
</t>
<t>
The results of LAYOUTCOMMIT contain a new size value in the form of
a newsize4 union data type. If the file's size is set as a result
of LAYOUTCOMMIT, the metadata server must reply with the new size;
otherwise, the new size is not provided.
If the file size is updated, the metadata server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> update the
storage devices such that the new file size is reflected when
LAYOUTCOMMIT processing is complete. For example, the client should
be able to read up to the new file size.
</t>
<t>
The client can extend the length of a file
or truncate a file by sending a SETATTR operation to the metadata server
with the size attribute specified. If the size specified is larger than
the current size of the file, the file is "zero extended", i.e., zeros are
implicitly added between the file's previous EOF and the new EOF.
(In many implementations, the zero-extended byte-range
of the file consists of unallocated
holes in the file.) When the client writes past EOF via WRITE,
the SETATTR operation does not need to be used.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="layoutcommit_update" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>LAYOUTCOMMIT and layoutupdate</name>
<t>
The LAYOUTCOMMIT argument contains a loca_layoutupdate field (<xref target="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT_ARGUMENT" format="default"/>) of data type layoutupdate4
(<xref target="layoutupdate4" format="default"/>). This argument is a
layout-type-specific structure. The structure can be used to pass
arbitrary layout-type-specific information from the client to the
metadata server at LAYOUTCOMMIT time. For example, if using a
block/volume layout, the client can indicate to the metadata server
which reserved or allocated blocks the client used or did not use.
The content of loca_layoutupdate (field lou_body) need not be the
same layout-type-specific content returned by LAYOUTGET (<xref target="OP_LAYOUTGET_RESULT" format="default"/>) in the loc_body field of the
lo_content field of the logr_layout field.
The content of
loca_layoutupdate is defined by the layout type specification and is
opaque to LAYOUTCOMMIT.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] Layout Semantics -->
<section anchor="recalling_layout" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Recalling a Layout</name>
<t>
Since a layout protects a client's access to a file via a direct
client-storage-device path, a layout need only be recalled when it
is semantically unable to serve this function. Typically, this
occurs when the layout no longer encapsulates the true location of
the file over the byte-range it represents. Any operation or
action, such as server-driven restriping or load balancing, that
changes the layout will result in a recall of the layout. A layout
is recalled by the CB_LAYOUTRECALL callback operation (see <xref target="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL" format="default"/>) and returned with LAYOUTRETURN (see <xref target="OP_LAYOUTRETURN" format="default"/>). The CB_LAYOUTRECALL operation may
recall a layout identified by a byte-range, all layouts
associated with a file system ID (FSID), or all layouts associated with
a client ID.
<xref target="pnfs_operation_sequencing" format="default"/> discusses sequencing issues
surrounding the getting, returning, and recalling of layouts.
</t>
<t>
An iomode is also specified when recalling a layout.
Generally, the iomode in the recall request must match the layout
being returned; for example, a recall with an iomode of
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW should cause the client to only return
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW layouts and not LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ layouts.
However, a special LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY enumeration is
defined to enable recalling a layout of any iomode; in other words,
the client must return both LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ and LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW layouts.
</t>
<t>
A REMOVE operation <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> cause the metadata server to recall the
layout to prevent the client from accessing a non-existent file and
to reclaim state stored on the client. Since a REMOVE may be delayed
until the last close of the file has occurred, the recall may also
be delayed until this time. After the last reference on the file
has been released and the file has been removed, the client should
no longer be able to perform I/O using the layout. In the case of a
file-based layout, the data server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_STALE in
response to any operation on the removed file.
</t>
<t>
Once a layout has been returned, the client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> send I/Os to
the storage devices for the file, byte-range, and iomode
represented by the returned layout. If a client does send an I/O to
a storage device for which it does not hold a layout, the storage
device <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> reject the I/O.
</t>
<t anchor="pnfs_and_delegations">
Although pNFS does not alter the file data caching capabilities of
clients, or their semantics, it recognizes that some clients may
perform more aggressive write-behind caching to optimize the
benefits provided by pNFS. However, write-behind caching may
negatively affect the latency in returning a layout in response to a
CB_LAYOUTRECALL; this is similar to file delegations and the impact
that file data caching has on DELEGRETURN. Client implementations
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> limit the amount of unwritten data they have outstanding at
any one time in order to prevent excessively long responses to
CB_LAYOUTRECALL. Once a layout is recalled, a server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> wait one
lease period before taking further action. As soon as a lease
period has passed, the server may choose to fence the client's access
to the storage devices if the server perceives the client has taken
too long to return a layout. However, just as in the case of data
delegation and DELEGRETURN, the server may choose to wait, given that
the client is showing forward progress on its way to returning the
layout. This forward progress can take the form of successful
interaction with the storage devices or of sub-portions of the layout
being returned by the client. The server can also limit exposure to
these problems by limiting the byte-ranges initially provided in
the layouts and thus the amount of outstanding modified data.
</t>
<section anchor="recall_robustness" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout Recall Callback Robustness</name>
<t>
It has been assumed thus far that pNFS client
state
(layout ranges and iomode)
for a file exactly matches that of the pNFS server for that file.
This assumption
leads to the implication that any callback results in a
LAYOUTRETURN or set of LAYOUTRETURNs that exactly match the range in
the callback, since both client and server agree about the state
being maintained. However, it can be useful if this assumption does
not always hold. For example:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If conflicts that require
callbacks are very rare, and a server can use a multi-file callback
to recover per-client resources (e.g., via an FSID recall or a
multi-file recall within a single CB_COMPOUND), the result may be
significantly less client-server pNFS traffic.
</li>
<li>
It may be useful for servers to maintain information about
what ranges are held by a client on a coarse-grained basis, leading
to the server's layout ranges being beyond those actually held by
the client.
In the extreme, a server could manage conflicts on
a per-file basis, only sending whole-file callbacks even though
clients may request and be granted sub-file ranges.
</li>
<li>
It may be useful for clients to "forget" details about
what layouts and ranges the client actually has, leading
to the server's layout ranges being beyond those that the
client "thinks" it has. As long as the client does not
assume it has layouts that are beyond what the server
has granted, this is a safe practice. When a client
forgets what ranges and layouts it has, and it receives
a CB_LAYOUTRECALL operation, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> follow up
with a LAYOUTRETURN for what the server recalled, or
alternatively return the NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT error
if it has no layout to return in the recalled range.
</li>
<li>
In order to avoid errors, it is vital that a client not assign
itself layout permissions beyond what the server has granted, and
that the server not forget layout permissions that have been granted.
On the other hand, if a
server believes that a client holds a layout that the client
does not know about, it is useful for the client to cleanly indicate
completion of the requested recall either by sending a LAYOUTRETURN
operation for the entire requested range or by returning an
NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT error to the CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Thus, in light of the above, it is useful for a server to be able to
send callbacks for layout ranges it has not granted to a client,
and for a client to return ranges it does not hold. A pNFS client
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> always return layouts that comprise the full range
specified by the recall. Note, the full recalled layout range need
not be returned as part of a single operation, but may be returned
in portions. This allows the client to stage the flushing of dirty
data and commits and returns of layouts.
Also, it indicates to the
metadata server that the client is making progress.
</t>
<t>
When a layout is returned, the client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> have any outstanding
I/O requests to the storage devices involved in the layout.
Rephrasing, the client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return the layout while it has
outstanding I/O requests to the storage device.
</t>
<t>
Even with this requirement for the client, it is possible that I/O
requests may be presented to a storage device no longer allowed to
perform them. Since the server has no strict control as to when the
client will return the layout, the server may later decide to
unilaterally revoke the client's access to the storage devices
as provided by the layout. In
choosing to revoke access, the server must deal with the possibility
of lingering I/O requests, i.e., I/O requests that are
still in flight to
storage devices identified by the revoked layout.
All layout type specifications <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> define whether unilateral layout revocation by
the metadata server is supported; if it is, the specification must
also describe how lingering writes are processed. For example,
storage devices identified by the revoked layout could be fenced off
from the client that held the layout.
</t>
<t>
In order to ensure client/server convergence with regard to layout state,
the final LAYOUTRETURN operation in a sequence of LAYOUTRETURN
operations for a particular recall <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> specify the entire range
being recalled, echoing the recalled layout type, iomode,
recall/return type (FILE, FSID, or ALL), and byte-range, even if
layouts pertaining to partial ranges were previously
returned. In addition, if the client holds no layouts that
overlap the range being recalled, the client should return the
NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT error code to CB_LAYOUTRECALL. This
allows the server to update its view of the client's layout state.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="pnfs_operation_sequencing" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Sequencing of Layout Operations</name>
<t>
As with other stateful operations, pNFS requires the correct
sequencing of layout operations. pNFS uses the "seqid" in the
layout stateid to provide the correct sequencing between regular
operations and callbacks. It is the server's responsibility to
avoid inconsistencies regarding the layouts provided and the
client's responsibility to properly serialize its layout requests
and layout returns.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout Recall and Return Sequencing</name>
<t>
One critical issue with regard to layout operations sequencing
concerns callbacks. The protocol must defend against
races between the reply to a LAYOUTGET or LAYOUTRETURN
operation and a subsequent CB_LAYOUTRECALL. A client
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> process a CB_LAYOUTRECALL that implies one or
more outstanding LAYOUTGET or LAYOUTRETURN operations to
which the client has not yet received a reply. The client
detects such a CB_LAYOUTRECALL by examining the "seqid"
field of the recall's layout stateid. If the "seqid"
is not exactly one higher than what the client currently has recorded, and the
client has at least one LAYOUTGET and/or LAYOUTRETURN operation
outstanding, the client knows the server sent the CB_LAYOUTRECALL
after sending a response to an outstanding LAYOUTGET or LAYOUTRETURN.
The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> wait before processing such a CB_LAYOUTRECALL
until it processes all replies for outstanding LAYOUTGET and
LAYOUTRETURN operations for the corresponding file
with seqid less than the seqid given by CB_LAYOUTRECALL
(lor_stateid; see <xref target="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL" format="default"/>.)
</t>
<t>
In addition to the seqid-based mechanism,
<xref target="sessions_callback_races" format="default"/>
describes the sessions mechanism for allowing the
client to detect callback race conditions and delay processing such a
CB_LAYOUTRECALL. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> reference conflicting operations
in the CB_SEQUENCE that precedes the CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
Because the server has already sent replies for these operations before
sending the callback, the replies may race with the CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> wait for all the referenced calls to complete and update
its view of the layout state before processing the CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Get/Return Sequencing</name>
<t>
The protocol allows the client to send concurrent
LAYOUTGET and LAYOUTRETURN operations to the server. The
protocol does not provide any means for the server to
process the requests in the same order in which they
were created. However, through the use of the "seqid"
field in the layout stateid, the client can determine
the order in which parallel outstanding operations were
processed by the server. Thus, when a layout retrieved
by an outstanding LAYOUTGET operation intersects with
a layout returned by an outstanding LAYOUTRETURN on
the same file, the order in which the two conflicting
operations are processed determines the final state of
the overlapping layout. The order is determined by
the "seqid" returned in each operation: the operation with the
higher seqid was executed later.
</t>
<t>
It is permissible for the client to send multiple parallel
LAYOUTGET operations for the same file or multiple parallel LAYOUTRETURN
operations for the same file or a mix of both.
</t>
<t>
It is permissible for the client to use the current stateid (see
<xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/>) for LAYOUTGET operations, for
example, when compounding LAYOUTGETs or compounding OPEN and
LAYOUTGETs. It is also permissible to use the current stateid when
compounding LAYOUTRETURNs.
</t>
<t>
It is permissible for the client to use the current stateid when
combining LAYOUTRETURN and LAYOUTGET operations for the same file in
the same COMPOUND request since the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> process these in
order. However, if a client does send such COMPOUND requests, it
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> have more than one outstanding for the same file at the
same time, and it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> have other LAYOUTGET or LAYOUTRETURN
operations outstanding at the same time for that same file.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Considerations</name>
<t>
Consider a pNFS client that has sent a LAYOUTGET, and before
it receives the reply to LAYOUTGET, it receives
a CB_LAYOUTRECALL for the same file with an overlapping range. There are two
possibilities, which the client can distinguish
via the layout stateid in the recall.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The server processed the LAYOUTGET before sending the recall, so the
LAYOUTGET must be waited for because it
may be carrying layout information that will need to be returned to deal
with the CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
</li>
<li>
The
server sent the callback before receiving the
LAYOUTGET. The server will not respond to the LAYOUTGET
until the CB_LAYOUTRECALL is processed.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
If these possibilities cannot be distinguished, a
deadlock could result, as the client must wait for the
LAYOUTGET response before processing the recall in the
first case, but that response will not arrive until after
the recall is processed in the second case. Note that
in the first case, the "seqid" in the layout stateid
of the recall is two greater than what the client has
recorded; in the second case, the "seqid" is one greater than
what the client has recorded. This allows the client
to disambiguate between the two cases. The client thus
knows precisely which possibility applies.
</t>
<t>
In case 1, the client knows it needs to wait for
the LAYOUTGET response before processing the recall
(or the client can return NFS4ERR_DELAY).
</t>
<t>
In case 2, the client will not wait for the LAYOUTGET
response before processing the recall because waiting
would cause deadlock. Therefore, the action at the
client will only require waiting in the case that the
client has not yet seen the server's earlier responses
to the LAYOUTGET operation(s).
</t>
<t>
The recall process can be considered completed when
the final LAYOUTRETURN operation for the recalled range is completed.
The LAYOUTRETURN uses the layout stateid (with seqid) specified in
CB_LAYOUTRECALL. If the client uses multiple LAYOUTRETURNs in
processing the recall, the first LAYOUTRETURN will use the layout
stateid as specified in CB_LAYOUTRECALL. Subsequent LAYOUTRETURNs
will use the highest seqid as is the usual case.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="layout_server_consider" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Server Considerations</name>
<t>
Consider a race from the metadata server's point of
view. The metadata server has sent a CB_LAYOUTRECALL and receives
an overlapping LAYOUTGET for the same file before the
LAYOUTRETURN(s) that respond to the CB_LAYOUTRECALL. There are
three cases:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The client sent the LAYOUTGET before processing the CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
The "seqid" in the layout stateid of the arguments of LAYOUTGET is one less
than the "seqid" in CB_LAYOUTRECALL. The server returns
NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT to the client, which indicates to the client
that there is a pending recall.
</li>
<li>
The client sent the LAYOUTGET after processing the
CB_LAYOUTRECALL, but the LAYOUTGET arrived before the LAYOUTRETURN and
the response to CB_LAYOUTRECALL that
completed that processing.
The "seqid" in the layout stateid
of LAYOUTGET is equal to or greater than that of the "seqid" in
CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
The server has not received a response to the CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
so it returns NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT.
</li>
<li>
The client sent the LAYOUTGET after processing the
CB_LAYOUTRECALL; the server received the CB_LAYOUTRECALL
response, but the LAYOUTGET arrived before the LAYOUTRETURN that
completed that processing.
The "seqid" in the layout stateid
of LAYOUTGET is equal to that of the "seqid" in
CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
The server has received a response to the CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
so it returns NFS4ERR_RETURNCONFLICT.
</li>
</ol>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Wraparound and Validation of Seqid</name>
<t>
The rules for layout stateid processing differ from other stateids
in the protocol because the "seqid" value cannot be zero and the
stateid's "seqid" value changes in a CB_LAYOUTRECALL operation. The
non-zero requirement combined with the inherent parallelism of
layout operations means that a set of LAYOUTGET and LAYOUTRETURN
operations may contain the same value for "seqid".
The server uses a slightly modified version of the modulo arithmetic
as described in
<xref target="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" format="default"/>
when incrementing the layout stateid's "seqid". The difference
is that zero is not a valid value for "seqid"; when the value
of a "seqid" is 0xFFFFFFFF, the next valid value will be 0x00000001.
The modulo arithmetic is also used for the comparisons of
"seqid" values in the processing of CB_LAYOUTRECALL events as
described above in <xref target="layout_server_consider" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Just as the server validates the "seqid" in the event of
CB_LAYOUTRECALL usage, as described in
<xref target="layout_server_consider" format="default"/>, the server also validates
the "seqid" value to ensure that it is within an appropriate range.
This range represents the degree of parallelism the server supports
for layout stateids. If the client is sending multiple layout
operations to the server in parallel, by definition, the "seqid"
value in the supplied stateid will not be the current "seqid" as
held by the server. The range of parallelism spans from the highest
or current "seqid" to a "seqid" value in the past. To assist in the
discussion, the server's current "seqid" value for a layout stateid
is defined as SERVER_CURRENT_SEQID. The lowest "seqid" value that
is acceptable to the server is represented by PAST_SEQID. And the
value for the range of valid "seqid"s or range of parallelism is
VALID_SEQID_RANGE. Therefore, the following holds:
VALID_SEQID_RANGE = SERVER_CURRENT_SEQID - PAST_SEQID. In the
following, all arithmetic is the modulo arithmetic as described
above.
</t>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support a minimum VALID_SEQID_RANGE. The minimum is
defined as: VALID_SEQID_RANGE = summation over 1..N of
(ca_maxoperations(i) - 1), where N is the number of session fore
channels and ca_maxoperations(i) is the value of the ca_maxoperations returned from
CREATE_SESSION of the i'th session. The reason for "- 1" is to allow for the required
SEQUENCE operation. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support a VALID_SEQID_RANGE
value larger than the minimum. The maximum VALID_SEQID_RANGE is (2<sup>32</sup> - 2) (accounting for zero not being a valid "seqid" value).
</t>
<t>
If the server finds the "seqid" is zero, the NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID
error is returned to the client. The server further validates the
"seqid" to ensure it is within the range of parallelism,
VALID_SEQID_RANGE. If the "seqid" value is outside of that range,
the error NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID is returned to the client. Upon
receipt of NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID, the client updates the stateid in
the layout request based on processing of other layout requests and
re-sends the operation to the server.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="bulk_layouts" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Bulk Recall and Return</name>
<t>
pNFS supports recalling and returning all layouts that
are for files belonging to a particular fsid
(LAYOUTRECALL4_FSID, LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID) or client ID
(LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL, LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL).
There are no "bulk" stateids, so detection of races
via the seqid is not possible.
The server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> initiate bulk recall while another
recall is in progress, or the corresponding LAYOUTRETURN
is in progress or pending.
In the event the server sends a bulk recall
while the client has a pending or in-progress LAYOUTRETURN,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL, or LAYOUTGET, the client returns
NFS4ERR_DELAY. In the event the client sends a LAYOUTGET
or LAYOUTRETURN while a bulk recall is in progress, the
server returns NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT.
If the client sends a LAYOUTGET or LAYOUTRETURN after
the server receives NFS4ERR_DELAY from a bulk recall,
then to ensure forward progress, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT.
</t>
<t>
Once a CB_LAYOUTRECALL of LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL is sent,
the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> allow the client to use any layout
stateid except for LAYOUTCOMMIT operations. Once the client receives
a CB_LAYOUTRECALL of LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use
any layout stateid except for LAYOUTCOMMIT operations.
Once a LAYOUTRETURN of LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL is sent, all
layout stateids granted to the client ID are freed.
The client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use the layout stateids again. It
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use LAYOUTGET to obtain new layout stateids.
</t>
<t>
Once a CB_LAYOUTRECALL of LAYOUTRECALL4_FSID is sent, the
server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> allow the client to use any layout stateid
that refers to a file with the specified fsid except for
LAYOUTCOMMIT operations. Once the client receives a CB_LAYOUTRECALL
of LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use any layout stateid
that refers to a file with the specified fsid except
for LAYOUTCOMMIT operations.
Once a LAYOUTRETURN of LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID is sent, all
layout stateids granted to the referenced fsid are freed.
The client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use those freed layout stateids for files
with the referenced fsid again. Subsequently, for any file with
the referenced fsid, to use a layout, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> first
send a LAYOUTGET operation in order to
obtain a new layout stateid for that file.
</t>
<t>
If the server has sent a bulk CB_LAYOUTRECALL and
receives a LAYOUTGET, or a LAYOUTRETURN with a stateid,
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT. If the
server has sent a bulk CB_LAYOUTRECALL and receives a
LAYOUTRETURN with an lr_returntype that is not equal to
the lor_recalltype of the CB_LAYOUTRECALL, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="revoke_layout" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Revoking Layouts</name>
<t>
Parallel NFS permits servers to revoke layouts from clients
that fail to respond to recalls and/or fail to renew their
lease in time. Depending on the layout type,
the server might revoke the layout and might take certain actions
with respect to the client's I/O to data servers.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="async_writes" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Metadata Server Write Propagation</name>
<t>
Asynchronous writes written through the metadata server may be
propagated lazily to the storage devices. For data written
asynchronously through the metadata server, a client performing a
read at the appropriate storage device is not guaranteed to see the
newly written data until a COMMIT occurs at the metadata server.
While the write is pending, reads to the storage device may give out
either the old data, the new data, or a mixture of new and old.
Upon completion of a synchronous WRITE or COMMIT (for asynchronously
written data), the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ensure that storage devices
give out the new data and that the data has been written to stable
storage. If the server implements its storage in any way such that
it cannot obey these constraints, then it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> recall the layouts to
prevent reads being done that cannot be handled correctly. Note
that the layouts <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled prior to the server responding to
the associated WRITE operations.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>pNFS Mechanics</name>
<t>
This section describes the operations flow taken by a pNFS client
to a metadata server and storage device.
</t>
<t>
When a pNFS client encounters a new FSID, it sends a GETATTR to the
NFSv4.1 server for the fs_layout_type (<xref target="attrdef_fs_layout_type" format="default"/>) attribute. If the attribute returns at least one layout type,
and the layout types returned are among the set supported by
the client, the client knows that pNFS is a possibility for the file
system. If, from the server that returned the new FSID, the client
does not have a client ID that came from an EXCHANGE_ID result that
returned EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send an EXCHANGE_ID to
the server with the EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS bit set. If the
server's response does not have EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS, then
contrary to what the fs_layout_type attribute said, the server does
not support pNFS, and the client will not be able use pNFS to that
server; in this case, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP in
response to any pNFS operation.
</t>
<t>
The client then creates a session, requesting a persistent session, so
that exclusive creates can be done with single round trip via the
createmode4 of GUARDED4. If the session ends up not being persistent,
the client will use EXCLUSIVE4_1 for exclusive creates.
</t>
<t>
If a file is to be created on a pNFS-enabled file
system, the client uses the OPEN operation. With the
normal set of attributes that may be provided upon OPEN
used for creation, there is an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> layout_hint
attribute. The client's use of layout_hint allows the
client to express its preference for a layout type and its
associated layout details. The use of a createmode4 of
UNCHECKED4, GUARDED4, or EXCLUSIVE4_1 will allow the
client to provide the layout_hint attribute at create
time. The client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use EXCLUSIVE4 (see <xref target="exclusive_create" format="default"/>). The client is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>
to combine a GETATTR operation after the OPEN within
the same COMPOUND. The GETATTR may then retrieve
the layout_type attribute for the newly created file.
The client will then know what layout type the server has
chosen for the file and therefore what storage protocol
the client must use.
</t>
<t>
If the client wants to open an existing file, then it also includes
a GETATTR to determine what layout type the file supports.
</t>
<t>
The GETATTR in either the file creation or plain file open case can
also include the layout_blksize and layout_alignment attributes so
that the client can determine optimal offsets and lengths for I/O on
the file.
</t>
<t>
Assuming the client supports the layout type returned by GETATTR and
it chooses to use pNFS for data access, it then sends LAYOUTGET
using the filehandle and stateid returned by OPEN, specifying the range it wants
to do I/O on. The response is a layout, which may be a subset of the
range for which the client asked. It also includes device IDs and a
description of how data is organized (or in the case of writing, how
data is to be organized) across the devices. The device IDs and
data description are encoded in a format that is specific to the
layout type, but the client is expected to understand.
</t>
<t>
When the client wants to send an I/O, it determines to which device ID
it needs to send the I/O command by examining the data
description in the layout. It then sends a
GETDEVICEINFO to find the device address(es) of the device ID. The
client then sends the I/O request to one of device ID's device addresses, using the
storage protocol defined for the layout type.
Note that if a client has multiple I/Os to send,
these I/O requests may be done in parallel.
</t>
<t>
If the I/O was a WRITE, then at some point
the client may want to use LAYOUTCOMMIT to
commit the modification time and the new size
of the file (if it believes it extended the file size) to the
metadata server and the modified data to the file system.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="crash_recovery" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Recovery</name>
<t>
Recovery is complicated by the distributed nature of the pNFS
protocol. In general, crash recovery for layouts is similar to
crash recovery for delegations in the base NFSv4.1 protocol. However,
the client's ability to perform I/O without contacting the metadata
server introduces subtleties that must be handled correctly if
the possibility of file system corruption is to be avoided.
</t>
<section anchor="pnfs_client_recovery" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Recovery from Client Restart</name>
<t>
Client recovery for layouts is similar to client recovery for other
lock and delegation state. When a pNFS client restarts, it will lose
all information about the layouts that it previously owned. There
are two methods by which the server can reclaim these resources and
allow otherwise conflicting layouts to be provided to other
clients.
</t>
<t>
The first is through the expiry of the client's lease. If the
client recovery time is longer than the lease period, the client's
lease will expire and the server will know that state may be
released. For layouts, the server may release the state immediately
upon lease expiry or it may allow the layout to persist, awaiting
possible lease revival, as long as no other layout conflicts.
</t>
<t>
The second is through the client restarting in less time than it
takes for the lease period to expire. In such a case, the client
will contact the server through the standard EXCHANGE_ID protocol.
The server will find that the client's co_ownerid matches the
co_ownerid of the previous client invocation, but that the verifier
is different. The server uses this as a signal to release all
layout state associated with the client's previous invocation. In
this scenario, the data written by the client but not covered by a
successful LAYOUTCOMMIT is in an undefined state; it may have been
written or it may now be lost. This is acceptable behavior and it
is the client's responsibility to use LAYOUTCOMMIT to achieve the
desired level of stability.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="lease_expiration_client" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Dealing with Lease Expiration on the Client</name>
<t anchor="pnfs_clnt_case1">
If a client believes its lease has expired, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> send I/O
to the storage device until it has validated its lease. The client
can send a SEQUENCE operation to the metadata server. If the
SEQUENCE operation is successful, but sr_status_flag has
SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED,
SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_SOME_STATE_REVOKED, or
SEQ4_STATUS_ADMIN_STATE_REVOKED set, the client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use
currently held layouts. The client has two
choices to recover from the lease expiration. First, for all
modified but uncommitted data, the client writes it to the metadata server
using the FILE_SYNC4 flag for the WRITEs, or WRITE and
COMMIT. Second, the client re-establishes a client ID and session with
the server and obtains new layouts and device-ID-to-device-address
mappings for the modified data ranges and then writes the data to the
storage devices with the newly obtained layouts.
</t>
<t anchor="pnfs_clnt_case2">
If sr_status_flags from the metadata server has
SEQ4_STATUS_RESTART_RECLAIM_NEEDED set
(or SEQUENCE returns NFS4ERR_BAD_SESSION and
CREATE_SESSION returns NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID), then the metadata
server has restarted, and the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> recover using the
methods described in <xref target="mds_recovery" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t anchor="pnfs_clnt_case3">
If sr_status_flags from the metadata server has
SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED set, then the client recovers by following
the procedure described in <xref target="transferred_lease" format="default"/>. After that, the client may get an
indication that the layout state was not moved with the file
system. The client recovers as in the other
applicable situations discussed in the first two paragraphs of this section.
</t>
<t anchor="pnfs_clnt_case4">
If sr_status_flags reports no loss of state, then the lease for the
layouts that the client has are valid and
renewed, and the client can once again send I/O requests to the
storage devices.
</t>
<t>
While clients <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> send I/Os to storage devices that may
extend past the lease expiration time period, this is not always
possible, for example, an extended network partition that starts
after the I/O is sent and does not heal until the I/O request is
received by the storage device. Thus, the metadata server and/or
storage devices are responsible for protecting themselves from I/Os
that are both sent before the lease expires and arrive after the lease
expires. See <xref target="lease_expiration_mds" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="lease_expiration_mds" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Dealing with Loss of Layout State on the Metadata Server</name>
<t>
This is a description of the case where all of the following are
true:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
the metadata server has not restarted
</li>
<li>
a pNFS client's
layouts have been discarded (usually because the client's lease
expired) and are invalid
</li>
<li>
an I/O from the pNFS client arrives at the storage device
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The metadata server and its storage devices <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> solve this by
fencing the client. In other words, they <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> solve this by
preventing the execution of I/O operations from the client to the
storage devices after layout
state loss. The details of how fencing is done are specific to the
layout type. The solution for NFSv4.1 file-based layouts is
described in (<xref target="file_layout_revoke" format="default"/>), and solutions for other
layout types are in their respective external specification documents.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="mds_recovery" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Recovery from Metadata Server Restart</name>
<t>
The pNFS client will discover that the metadata server has
restarted via the methods described in <xref target="server_failure" format="default"/> and discussed in a pNFS-specific
context in <xref target="pnfs_clnt_case2" format="default"/>. The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> stop using
layouts and delete the device ID to device address mappings it
previously received from the metadata server. Having done that,
if the client wrote data to the storage device without committing
the layouts via LAYOUTCOMMIT, then the client has
additional work to do in order to have the client, metadata server,
and storage device(s) all synchronized on the state of the data.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
If the client has data still modified
and unwritten in the client's memory, the client has only two choices.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The client can obtain a layout via LAYOUTGET after the
server's grace period and write the data to the storage devices.
</li>
<li>
The client can WRITE that data through the metadata server using the
WRITE (<xref target="OP_WRITE" format="default"/>) operation, and then obtain
layouts as desired.
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
If the client asynchronously wrote data to the storage device, but
still has a copy of the data in its memory, then it has available
to it the recovery options listed above in the previous bullet
point. If the metadata server is also in its grace period, the
client has available to it the options below in the next bullet
point.
</li>
<li>
<t>
The client does not have a copy of the data in its memory and the
metadata server is still in its grace period. The client cannot
use LAYOUTGET (within or outside the grace period) to reclaim a
layout because the contents of the response from LAYOUTGET
may not match what it had previously. The range might be
different or the client might get the same range but the content of the
layout might be different. Even if the content of the layout
appears to be the same, the device IDs may map to different
device addresses, and even if the device addresses are the same,
the device addresses could have been assigned to a different
storage device. The option of retrieving the data from the
storage device and writing it to the metadata server per the
recovery scenario described above is
not available because, again, the mappings of range to device ID,
device ID to device address, and device address to physical device are
stale, and new mappings via new LAYOUTGET do not solve the problem.
</t>
<t>
The only recovery option for this scenario is to send a
LAYOUTCOMMIT in reclaim mode, which the metadata server will
accept as long as it is in its grace period. The use of
LAYOUTCOMMIT in reclaim mode informs the metadata server that the
layout has changed. It is critical that the metadata server
receive this information before its grace period ends, and thus
before it starts allowing updates to the file system.
</t>
<t>
To send LAYOUTCOMMIT in reclaim mode, the client sets the
loca_reclaim field of the operation's arguments (<xref target="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT_ARGUMENT" format="default"/>) to TRUE. During the metadata
server's recovery grace period (and only during the recovery grace
period) the metadata server is prepared to accept LAYOUTCOMMIT
requests with the loca_reclaim field set to TRUE.
</t>
<t>
When loca_reclaim is TRUE, the client is attempting to commit
changes to the layout that occurred prior to the restart
of the metadata server. The metadata server applies some
consistency checks on the loca_layoutupdate field of the arguments
to determine whether the client can commit the data written to the
storage device to the file system. The loca_layoutupdate field is of
data type layoutupdate4 and contains layout-type-specific content
(in the lou_body field of loca_layoutupdate). The
layout-type-specific information that loca_layoutupdate might have
is discussed in <xref target="layoutcommit_update" format="default"/>. If the
metadata server's consistency checks on loca_layoutupdate succeed,
then the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> commit the data (as described by the
loca_offset, loca_length, and loca_layoutupdate fields of the
arguments) that was written to the storage device. If the metadata
server's consistency checks on loca_layoutupdate fail, the
metadata server rejects the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation and makes no
changes to the file system. However, any time LAYOUTCOMMIT with
loca_reclaim TRUE fails, the pNFS client has lost all the data in
the range defined by &lt;loca_offset, loca_length&gt;. A client
can defend against this risk by caching all data, whether written
synchronously or asynchronously in its memory, and by not releasing the
cached data until a successful LAYOUTCOMMIT. This condition
does not hold true for all layout types; for example, file-based
storage devices need not suffer from this limitation.
</t>
</li>
<li>
The client does not have a copy of the data in its memory and the
metadata server is no longer in its grace period; i.e., the metadata
server returns NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE. As with the scenario in the above
bullet point, the failure of LAYOUTCOMMIT means the data
in the range &lt;loca_offset, loca_length&gt; lost. The
defense against the risk is the same -- cache all written data
on the client until a successful LAYOUTCOMMIT.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="pnfs_grace_exception" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operations during Metadata Server Grace Period</name>
<t>
Some of the recovery scenarios thus far noted that some
operations (namely, WRITE and LAYOUTGET) might be permitted during
the metadata server's grace period. The metadata server may allow
these operations during its grace period. For LAYOUTGET, the
metadata server must reliably determine that servicing such a
request will not conflict with an impending LAYOUTCOMMIT reclaim
request. For WRITE, the metadata server
must reliably determine that servicing the request
will not conflict with an impending OPEN or with a LOCK where the
file has mandatory byte-range locking enabled.
</t>
<t>
As mentioned previously, for expediency,
the metadata server might reject some
operations (namely, WRITE and LAYOUTGET) during its
grace period, because the simplest correct approach
is to reject all non-reclaim pNFS requests and WRITE operations by
returning the NFS4ERR_GRACE error. However, depending on the
storage protocol (which is specific to the layout type) and
metadata server implementation, the metadata server may be able to
determine that a particular request is safe. For example, a
metadata server may save provisional allocation mappings for each
file to stable storage, as well as information about potentially
conflicting OPEN share modes and mandatory byte-range locks that might
have been in effect at the time of restart, and the metadata
server may use this information during the recovery grace period to determine that a
WRITE request is safe.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="storage_device_recovery" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Storage Device Recovery</name>
<t>
Recovery from storage device restart is mostly dependent upon the layout type
in use. However, there are a few general techniques a client can
use if it discovers a storage device has crashed while holding
modified, uncommitted data that was asynchronously written.
First and foremost, it
is important to realize that the client is the only one that has the
information necessary to recover non-committed data since
it holds the modified data and probably nothing else does. Second,
the best solution is for the client to err on the side of caution
and attempt to rewrite the modified data through another path.
</t>
<t>
The client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> immediately WRITE the data to the metadata server,
with the stable field in the WRITE4args set to FILE_SYNC4. Once it
does this, there is no need to wait for the original storage device.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Metadata and Storage Device Roles</name>
<t>
If the same physical hardware is used to implement both a
metadata server and storage device, then the same hardware
entity is to be understood to be implementing two
distinct roles and it is important that it be clearly
understood on behalf of which role the hardware is
executing at any given time.
</t>
<t>
Two sub-cases can be distinguished.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The storage device uses NFSv4.1 as the storage protocol, i.e., the same
physical hardware is used to implement both a metadata and data
server. See <xref target="pnfs_session_stuff" format="default"/>
for a description of how multiple roles are handled.
</li>
<li>
The storage device does not use NFSv4.1 as the storage protocol,
and the same physical hardware is used to implement both a
metadata and storage device. Whether distinct network addresses
are used to access the metadata server and storage device is
immaterial. This is because it is always clear to the pNFS client and
server, from the upper-layer protocol being used (NFSv4.1 or
non-NFSv4.1), to which role the request to the common server network
address is directed.
</li>
</ol>
</section>
<section anchor="security_considerations_pnfs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Considerations for pNFS</name>
<t>
pNFS separates file system metadata and data and provides access to
both. There are pNFS-specific operations (listed in
<xref target="pnfs_ops" format="default"/>) that provide access to the metadata; all
existing NFSv4.1 conventional (non-pNFS) security mechanisms and
features apply to accessing the metadata. The combination of
components in a pNFS system (see <xref target="fig_system" format="default"/>) is
required to preserve the security properties of NFSv4.1 with respect
to an entity that is accessing a storage device from a client, including
security countermeasures to defend against threats for which NFSv4.1
provides defenses in environments where these threats are
considered significant.
</t>
<t>
In some cases, the security countermeasures for connections
to storage devices may take the form of physical isolation or a
recommendation to avoid the use of pNFS in an environment. For example, it
may be impractical to provide confidentiality protection for some
storage protocols to protect against eavesdropping. In
environments where eavesdropping on such protocols is of sufficient
concern to require countermeasures, physical isolation of the
communication channel (e.g., via direct connection from client(s)
to storage device(s)) and/or a decision to forgo use of pNFS (e.g.,
and fall back to conventional NFSv4.1) may be appropriate courses of action.
</t>
<t>
Where communication with storage devices is subject to the same
threats as client-to-metadata server communication, the protocols
used for that communication need to provide security mechanisms as
strong as or no weaker than those available via RPCSEC_GSS for
NFSv4.1. Except for the storage protocol used for the LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES
layout (see <xref target="file_layout_type" format="default"/>), i.e., except for NFSv4.1,
it is beyond the scope of this document to specify the security mechanisms
for storage access protocols.
</t>
<t>
pNFS implementations <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> remove NFSv4.1's access controls.
The combination of clients, storage devices, and the metadata server
are responsible for ensuring that all client-to-storage-device file
data access respects NFSv4.1's ACLs and file open modes. This entails
performing both of these checks on every access in the client, the
storage device, or both (as applicable; when the storage device is
an NFSv4.1 server, the storage device is ultimately responsible for
controlling access as described in <xref target="state_propagation" format="default"/>).
If a pNFS configuration performs these checks only in the client,
the risk of a misbehaving client obtaining unauthorized access is
an important consideration in determining when it is appropriate to
use such a pNFS configuration. Such layout types <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used
when client-only access checks do not provide sufficient assurance
that NFSv4.1 access control is being applied correctly. (This
is not a problem for the file layout type described in <xref target="file_layout_type" format="default"/> because the storage access protocol for
LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES is NFSv4.1, and thus the security model for
storage device access via LAYOUT4_NFSv4_1_FILES is the same as that
of the metadata server.) For handling of access control specific to
a layout, the reader should examine the layout specification, such as
the <xref target="file_layout_type" format="default">NFSv4.1/file-based layout</xref>
of this document, the <xref target="RFC5663" format="default">blocks
layout</xref>, and <xref target="RFC5664" format="default">objects
layout</xref>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="file_layout_type" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4.1 as a Storage Protocol in pNFS: the File Layout Type</name>
<t>
This section describes the semantics and format of NFSv4.1 file-based
layouts for pNFS.
NFSv4.1 file-based layouts use the LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES layout type.
The LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES type defines
striping data across multiple NFSv4.1 data servers.
</t>
<section anchor="pnfs_session_stuff" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client ID and Session Considerations</name>
<t>
Sessions are a <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> feature of NFSv4.1, and this
extends to both the metadata server and file-based (NFSv4.1-based)
data servers.
</t>
<t>
The role a server plays in pNFS is determined by the result it returns
from EXCHANGE_ID.
The roles are:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Metadata server (EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS is set in the result eir_flags).
</li>
<li>
Data server (EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS).
</li>
<li>
Non-metadata server (EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS). This is an NFSv4.1
server that does not support operations (e.g.,
LAYOUTGET) or attributes that pertain to pNFS.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> request zero or more of
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS,
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS, or
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS, even though some combinations
(e.g., EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS | EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS) are
contradictory. However, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> only return the following
acceptable combinations:
</t>
<table align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Acceptable Results from EXCHANGE_ID</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS | EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS | EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
As the above table implies, a server can have one
or two roles. A server can be both a metadata server
and a data server, or it can be both a data server and
non-metadata server. In addition to returning two roles
in the EXCHANGE_ID's results, and thus serving both roles
via a common client ID, a server can serve two roles
by returning a unique client ID and server owner for
each role in each of two EXCHANGE_ID results, with each
result indicating each role.
</t>
<t>
In the case of a server with concurrent pNFS roles that
are served by a common client ID, if the EXCHANGE_ID
request from the client has zero or a combination of the
bits set in eia_flags, the server result should set bits
that represent the higher of the acceptable combination
of the server roles, with a preference to match the roles
requested by the client. Thus, if a client request has
(EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS | EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS
| EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS) flags set, and the server
is both a metadata server and a data server, serving
both the roles by a common client ID, the server
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return with (EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS |
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS) set.
</t>
<t>
In the case of a server that has multiple concurrent
pNFS roles, each role served by a unique client ID,
if the client specifies zero or a combination of roles
in the request, the server results <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return only
one of the roles from the combination specified by the
client request. If the role specified by the server
result does not match the intended use by the client,
the client should send the EXCHANGE_ID specifying just
the interested pNFS role.
</t>
<t>
If a pNFS metadata client gets a layout that refers it to an NFSv4.1
data server, it needs a client ID on that data server. If it does not
yet have a client ID from the server that had the EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS
flag set in the EXCHANGE_ID results, then the client needs to
send an EXCHANGE_ID to the data server, using
the same co_ownerid as it sent to the metadata server, with the
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS flag set in the arguments.
If the server's
EXCHANGE_ID results have EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS set, then the
client may use the client ID to create sessions that will
exchange pNFS data operations.
The client ID returned by the data server has no relationship with
the client ID returned by a metadata server unless the client IDs
are equal, and the server owners and server scopes of the data server
and metadata server are equal.
</t>
<t>
In NFSv4.1, the
session ID in the SEQUENCE operation implies the
client ID, which in turn might be used by the server to
map the stateid to the right client/server pair.
However, when a data server is presented with a READ or
WRITE operation with a stateid, because the
stateid is associated with a
client ID on a metadata server, and because the session ID in
the preceding SEQUENCE operation is tied to the
client ID of the data server, the data server has no
obvious way to determine the metadata server from the
COMPOUND procedure, and thus has no way to validate the
stateid. One <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> approach is for pNFS servers to
encode metadata server routing and/or identity
information in the data server filehandles as returned
in the layout.
</t>
<t>
If metadata server routing and/or identity information is encoded
in data server filehandles,
when the metadata server identity or location
changes, the data server filehandles it gave out will become
invalid (stale), and so the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> first
recall the layouts.
Invalidating a data server filehandle does not render
the NFS client's data cache invalid. The client's cache should
map a data server filehandle to a metadata server filehandle, and
a metadata server filehandle to cached data.
</t>
<t>
If a server is both a metadata server and a data server,
the server might need to distinguish operations on
files that are directed to the metadata server from
those that are directed to the data server. It is
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that the values of the filehandles returned by
the LAYOUTGET operation be different than the value
of the filehandle returned by the OPEN of the same file.
</t>
<t>
Another scenario is for the metadata server and the
storage device to be distinct from one client's point of
view, and the roles reversed from another client's point
of view. For example, in the cluster file system model,
a metadata server to one client might be a data server to
another client. If NFSv4.1 is being used as the storage
protocol, then pNFS servers need to encode the values
of filehandles according to their specific roles.
</t>
<section anchor="dsonly" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Sessions Considerations for Data Servers</name>
<t>
<xref target="Obligations_of_the_Client" format="default"/> states
that a client has to keep its lease renewed in
order to prevent a session from being deleted by
the server. If the reply to EXCHANGE_ID has just the
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS role set, then (as noted in
<xref target="ds_ops" format="default"/>) the client will not be able
to determine the data server's lease_time attribute
because GETATTR will not be permitted. Instead, the
rule is that any time a client receives a layout
referring it to a data server that returns just
the EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS role, the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
assume that the lease_time attribute from the metadata
server that returned the layout applies to the data
server. Thus, the data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be aware of the values
of all lease_time attributes of all metadata servers for which it
is providing I/O, and it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the maximum of all such
lease_time values as the lease interval for all client
IDs and sessions established on it.
</t>
<t>
For example, if one metadata server has a lease_time
attribute of 20 seconds, and a second metadata
server has a lease_time attribute of 10 seconds,
then if both servers return layouts that refer to an
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS-only data server, the data
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> renew a client's lease if the interval
between two SEQUENCE operations on different COMPOUND
requests is less than 20 seconds.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="file_layout_definitions" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File Layout Definitions</name>
<t>
The following definitions apply to the LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES
layout type and may be applicable to other layout types.
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>Unit.</dt>
<dd>
A unit is a fixed-size quantity of data written to a data server.
</dd>
<dt>Pattern.</dt>
<dd>
A pattern is a method of distributing one or more
equal sized units across a set of data servers.
A pattern is iterated one or more times.
</dd>
<dt>Stripe.</dt>
<dd>
A stripe is a set of data distributed
across a set of data servers in a
pattern before that pattern repeats.
</dd>
<dt>Stripe Count.</dt>
<dd>
A stripe count is the number of units in a pattern.
</dd>
<dt>Stripe Width.</dt>
<dd>
A stripe width is the size of a stripe in bytes.
The stripe width = the stripe count * the size of the stripe unit.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
Hereafter, this document will refer to a unit that is a written
in a pattern as a "stripe unit".
</t>
<t>
A pattern may have more stripe units than data servers.
If so, some data servers will have more than one stripe unit
per stripe. A data server that has multiple stripe
units per stripe <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> store each unit in a different data file (and
depending on the implementation, will possibly assign a unique data
filehandle to each data file).
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "File Striping Definitions" "file_layout_definitions" -->
<section anchor="file_data_types" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File Layout Data Types</name>
<t>
The high level NFSv4.1 layout types are
nfsv4_1_file_layouthint4,
nfsv4_1_file_layout_ds_addr4,
and nfsv4_1_file_layout4.
</t>
<t>
The SETATTR operation supports a layout hint attribute
(<xref target="attrdef_layout_hint" format="default"/>).
When the client sets a layout hint (data type layouthint4) with
a layout type of LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES (the loh_type field),
the loh_body field contains a value of data type
nfsv4_1_file_layouthint4.
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const NFL4_UFLG_MASK = 0x0000003F;
const NFL4_UFLG_DENSE = 0x00000001;
const NFL4_UFLG_COMMIT_THRU_MDS = 0x00000002;
const NFL4_UFLG_STRIPE_UNIT_SIZE_MASK
= 0xFFFFFFC0;
typedef uint32_t nfl_util4;
enum filelayout_hint_care4 {
NFLH4_CARE_DENSE = NFL4_UFLG_DENSE,
NFLH4_CARE_COMMIT_THRU_MDS
= NFL4_UFLG_COMMIT_THRU_MDS,
NFLH4_CARE_STRIPE_UNIT_SIZE
= 0x00000040,
NFLH4_CARE_STRIPE_COUNT = 0x00000080
};
/* Encoded in the loh_body field of data type layouthint4: */
struct nfsv4_1_file_layouthint4 {
uint32_t nflh_care;
nfl_util4 nflh_util;
count4 nflh_stripe_count;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The generic layout hint structure is described
in <xref target="layouthint4" format="default"/>. The client uses the
layout hint in the layout_hint (<xref target="attrdef_layout_hint" format="default"/>) attribute to indicate the preferred type
of layout to be used for a newly created file. The
LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES layout-type-specific content for the
layout hint is composed of three fields. The first field,
nflh_care, is a set of flags indicating which values of the hint the
client cares about. If the NFLH4_CARE_DENSE flag is set, then
the client indicates in the second field, nflh_util,
a preference for how the data
file is packed (<xref target="sparse_dense" format="default"/>), which is controlled
by the value of the expression nflh_util &amp; NFL4_UFLG_DENSE ("&amp;" represents the bitwise AND operator). If the
NFLH4_CARE_COMMIT_THRU_MDS flag is set, then the client indicates
a preference for whether the client should send COMMIT operations
to the metadata server or data server (<xref target="commit_thru_mds" format="default"/>),
which is controlled by the value of nflh_util &amp; NFL4_UFLG_COMMIT_THRU_MDS.
If the NFLH4_CARE_STRIPE_UNIT_SIZE flag is set, the client indicates
its preferred stripe unit size, which is indicated in
nflh_util &amp;
NFL4_UFLG_STRIPE_UNIT_SIZE_MASK (thus, the stripe
unit size <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a multiple of 64 bytes). The minimum stripe unit
size is 64 bytes.
If the NFLH4_CARE_STRIPE_COUNT flag is set, the client indicates
in the third field,
nflh_stripe_count, the stripe count. The stripe count multiplied
by the stripe unit size is the stripe width.
</t>
<t>
When LAYOUTGET returns a LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES layout
(indicated in the loc_type field of the lo_content field),
the loc_body field of the lo_content field
contains a value of data type nfsv4_1_file_layout4.
Among other content, nfsv4_1_file_layout4 has a storage
device ID (field nfl_deviceid) of data type
deviceid4.
The GETDEVICEINFO operation maps a device ID to
a storage device address (type device_addr4). When GETDEVICEINFO
returns a device address with a layout type of LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES
(the da_layout_type field), the da_addr_body field contains
a value of data type nfsv4_1_file_layout_ds_addr4.
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
typedef netaddr4 multipath_list4<>;
/*
* Encoded in the da_addr_body field of
* data type device_addr4:
*/
struct nfsv4_1_file_layout_ds_addr4 {
uint32_t nflda_stripe_indices<>;
multipath_list4 nflda_multipath_ds_list<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The nfsv4_1_file_layout_ds_addr4 data type represents the
device address. It is composed of two fields:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list: An array of lists of data servers, where
each list can be one or more elements, and each element represents
a data server address that may serve equally as the target of I/O operations (see
<xref target="file_multipath" format="default"/>).
The length of this array might be different than the stripe count.
</li>
<li>
nflda_stripe_indices: An array of indices used to index into
nflda_multipath_ds_list. The value of each element of nflda_stripe_indices <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be less than the number of elements in nflda_multipath_ds_list.
Each element of nflda_multipath_ds_list <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be referred to by one
or more elements of nflda_stripe_indices.
The number of elements in
nflda_stripe_indices is always equal to the stripe count.
</li>
</ol>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* Encoded in the loc_body field of
* data type layout_content4:
*/
struct nfsv4_1_file_layout4 {
deviceid4 nfl_deviceid;
nfl_util4 nfl_util;
uint32_t nfl_first_stripe_index;
offset4 nfl_pattern_offset;
nfs_fh4 nfl_fh_list<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The nfsv4_1_file_layout4 data type represents the layout.
It is composed of the following fields:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
nfl_deviceid: The device ID that maps to a value of type
nfsv4_1_file_layout_ds_addr4.
</li>
<li>
nfl_util: Like the nflh_util field of data type nfsv4_1_file_layouthint4,
a compact representation of how the data on a file
on each data server is packed, whether the client should send
COMMIT operations to the metadata server or data server, and the
stripe unit size. If a server returns two or
more overlapping layouts, each stripe unit size in
each overlapping layout <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same.
</li>
<li>
nfl_first_stripe_index: The index into the first element
of the nflda_stripe_indices array to use.
</li>
<li>
<t>
nfl_pattern_offset:
This field is the logical offset into the file
where the striping pattern starts. It is required for
converting the client's logical I/O offset (e.g., the current
offset in a POSIX file descriptor before the read() or write()
system call is sent) into the stripe unit number (see
<xref target="SUi" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
If dense packing is used, then nfl_pattern_offset
is also needed to convert the client's logical
I/O offset to an offset on the file on the data
server corresponding to the stripe unit number (see <xref target="sparse_dense" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
Note that nfl_pattern_offset is not always the same as
lo_offset. For example, via the LAYOUTGET operation,
a client might request a layout starting at offset 1000 of a
file that has its striping pattern start at offset zero.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
nfl_fh_list: An array of data server filehandles for each
list of data servers in each element of the nflda_multipath_ds_list
array. The number of elements in
nfl_fh_list depends on whether sparse or dense packing
is being used.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
If sparse packing is being used, the number of elements in
nfl_fh_list <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be one of three values:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Zero. This means that filehandles used
for each data server are the same as the
filehandle returned by the OPEN operation
from the metadata server.
</li>
<li>
One. This means that every data server uses
the same filehandle: what is specified in
nfl_fh_list[0].
</li>
<li>
The same number of elements in
nflda_multipath_ds_list. Thus, in this case,
when sending an I/O operation to any data server in
nflda_multipath_ds_list[X], the filehandle
in nfl_fh_list[X] <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
See the discussion on sparse packing in <xref target="sparse_dense" format="default"/>.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
If dense packing is being used, the number of elements
in nfl_fh_list <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same as the number
of elements in nflda_stripe_indices. Thus,
when sending an I/O operation to any data server in
nflda_multipath_ds_list[nflda_stripe_indices[Y]],
the filehandle in nfl_fh_list[Y] <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
used. In addition, any time there exists i
and j, (i != j), such that the intersection of
nflda_multipath_ds_list[nflda_stripe_indices[i]]
and nflda_multipath_ds_list[nflda_stripe_indices[j]]
is not empty, then nfl_fh_list[i] <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> equal
nfl_fh_list[j]. In other words, when dense packing
is being used, if a data server appears in two or more
units of a striping pattern, each reference to
the data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use a different filehandle.
</t>
<t>
Indeed, if there are multiple striping patterns,
as indicated by the presence of multiple objects of
data type layout4 (either returned in one or multiple
LAYOUTGET operations), and a data server is the target
of a unit of one pattern and another unit of another
pattern, then each reference to each data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
use a different filehandle.
</t>
<t>
See the discussion on dense packing in <xref target="sparse_dense" format="default"/>.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<t>
The details on the interpretation of the layout are in
<xref target="file_layout_interpret" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "File Layout Data Types" "file_data_types" -->
<section anchor="file_layout_interpret" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Interpreting the File Layout</name>
<section anchor="SUi" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Determining the Stripe Unit Number</name>
<t>
To find the stripe unit number that corresponds to the client's
logical file offset, the pattern offset will also be used. The
i'th stripe unit (SUi) is:
</t>
<sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[
relative_offset = file_offset - nfl_pattern_offset;
SUi = floor(relative_offset / stripe_unit_size);]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Interpreting the File Layout Using Sparse Packing</name>
<t>
When sparse packing is used, the algorithm for determining the filehandle and set
of data-server network addresses to write stripe unit i
(SUi) to is:
</t>
<sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[
stripe_count = number of elements in nflda_stripe_indices;
j = (SUi + nfl_first_stripe_index) % stripe_count;
idx = nflda_stripe_indices[j];
fh_count = number of elements in nfl_fh_list;
ds_count = number of elements in nflda_multipath_ds_list;
switch (fh_count) {
case ds_count:
fh = nfl_fh_list[idx];
break;
case 1:
fh = nfl_fh_list[0];
break;
case 0:
fh = filehandle returned by OPEN;
break;
default:
throw a fatal exception;
break;
}
address_list = nflda_multipath_ds_list[idx];]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The client would then select a data server from address_list, and
send a READ or WRITE operation using the filehandle specified in fh.
</t>
<t>
Consider the following example:
</t>
<t>
Suppose we have a device address consisting of seven
data servers, arranged in three equivalence (<xref target="file_multipath" format="default"/>) classes:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
{ A, B, C, D }, { E }, { F, G }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
where A through G are network addresses.
</t>
<t>
Then
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list&lt;&gt; = { A, B, C, D }, { E }, { F, G }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
i.e.,
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list[0] = { A, B, C, D }
</li>
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list[1] = { E }
</li>
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list[2] = { F, G }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Suppose the striping index array is:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nflda_stripe_indices&lt;&gt; = { 2, 0, 1, 0 }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Now suppose the client gets a layout that has a device ID
that maps to the above device address. The initial index contains
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nfl_first_stripe_index = 2,
</li>
</ul>
<t>
and the filehandle list is
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nfl_fh_list = { 0x36, 0x87, 0x67 }.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the client wants to write to SU0, the
set of valid { network address, filehandle } combinations
for SUi are determined by:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nfl_first_stripe_index = 2
</li>
</ul>
<t>
So
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
idx = nflda_stripe_indices[(0 + 2) % 4]
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
= nflda_stripe_indices[2]
</li>
<li>
= 1
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
So
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list[1] = { E }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
and
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nfl_fh_list[1] = { 0x87 }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The client can thus write SU0 to { 0x87, { E } }.
</t>
<t>
The destinations of the first 13 storage units are:
</t>
<!-- [rfced] We're curious why tables 9 and 10 contain blank lines? They don't
appear in the original. We're trying to understand the best XML to use to
format this table, and we wonder whether the breaks are necssary.
-->
<table align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">SUi</th>
<th align="left">filehandle</th>
<th align="left">data servers</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">87 </td>
<td align="left">E </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">67</td>
<td align="left">F,G</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">36 </td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">87</td>
<td align="left">E</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left">67</td>
<td align="left">F,G</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">87</td>
<td align="left">E</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="left">67</td>
<td align="left">F,G</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">87</td>
<td align="left">E</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Interpreting the File Layout Using Dense Packing</name>
<t>
When dense packing is used, the algorithm for determining the filehandle and set
of data server network addresses to write stripe unit i (SUi) to is:
</t>
<sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[
stripe_count = number of elements in nflda_stripe_indices;
j = (SUi + nfl_first_stripe_index) % stripe_count;
idx = nflda_stripe_indices[j];
fh_count = number of elements in nfl_fh_list;
ds_count = number of elements in nflda_multipath_ds_list;
switch (fh_count) {
case stripe_count:
fh = nfl_fh_list[j];
break;
default:
throw a fatal exception;
break;
}
address_list = nflda_multipath_ds_list[idx];]]></sourcecode>
<t>
The client would then select a data server from address_list, and
send a READ or WRITE operation using the filehandle specified in fh.
</t>
<t>
Consider the following example (which is the same
as the sparse packing example, except for the
filehandle list):
</t>
<t>
Suppose we have a device address consisting of seven
data servers, arranged in three equivalence (<xref target="file_multipath" format="default"/>) classes:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
{ A, B, C, D }, { E }, { F, G }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
where A through G are network addresses.
</t>
<t>
Then
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list&lt;&gt; = { A, B, C, D }, { E }, { F, G }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
i.e.,
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list[0] = { A, B, C, D }
</li>
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list[1] = { E }
</li>
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list[2] = { F, G }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Suppose the striping index array is:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nflda_stripe_indices&lt;&gt; = { 2, 0, 1, 0 }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Now suppose the client gets a layout that has a device ID
that maps to the above device address. The initial index contains
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nfl_first_stripe_index = 2,
</li>
</ul>
<t>
and
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nfl_fh_list = { 0x67, 0x37, 0x87, 0x36 }.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The interesting examples for dense packing are
SU1 and SU3 because each stripe unit refers to the
same data server list, yet each stripe unit <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use a different filehandle.
If the client wants to write to SU1, the
set of valid { network address, filehandle } combinations
for SUi are determined by:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li> nfl_first_stripe_index = 2 </li>
</ul>
<t>
So
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
<t> j = (1 + 2) % 4 = 3 </t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li> idx = nflda_stripe_indices[j] </li>
<li> = nflda_stripe_indices[3] </li>
<li> = 0 </li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
So
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nflda_multipath_ds_list[0] = { A, B, C, D }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
and
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
nfl_fh_list[3] = { 0x36 }
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The client can thus write SU1 to { 0x36, { A, B, C, D } }.
</t>
<t>
For SU3, j = (3 + 2) % 4 = 1, and nflda_stripe_indices[1] = 0.
Then nflda_multipath_ds_list[0] = { A, B, C, D }, and
nfl_fh_list[1] = 0x37. The client can thus write SU3 to
{ 0x37, { A, B, C, D } }.
</t>
<t>
The destinations of the first 13 storage units are:
</t>
<table align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">SUi</th>
<th align="left">filehandle</th>
<th align="left">data servers</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left"> 87 </td>
<td align="left"> E </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">67</td>
<td align="left">F,G</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">37 </td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">87</td>
<td align="left">E</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left">67</td>
<td align="left">F,G</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="left">37</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">87</td>
<td align="left">E</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="left">67</td>
<td align="left">F,G</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="left">37</td>
<td align="left">A,B,C,D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">87</td>
<td align="left">E</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section anchor="sparse_dense" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Sparse and Dense Stripe Unit Packing</name>
<t>
The flag NFL4_UFLG_DENSE of the nfl_util4 data type (field nflh_util of the
data type nfsv4_1_file_layouthint4 and field nfl_util of
data type nfsv4_1_file_layout_ds_addr4) specifies how the data
is packed within the
data file on a data server. It allows for two different data
packings: sparse and dense. The packing type determines the
calculation that will be made to map the client-visible file offset
to the offset within the data file located on the data server.
</t>
<t>
If nfl_util &amp; NFL4_UFLG_DENSE is zero, this means that
sparse packing is being used. Hence, the logical offsets of the
file as viewed by a client
sending READs and WRITEs directly to the metadata server
are the same offsets each data server uses when storing
a stripe unit. The effect then, for striping patterns
consisting of at least two stripe units, is for each
data server file to be sparse or "holey". So for example,
suppose there is a pattern with three stripe units, the stripe unit
size is 4096 bytes, and there are three data servers in
the pattern. Then, the file in data server 1 will have
stripe units 0, 3, 6, 9, ... filled; data server 2's
file will have stripe units 1, 4, 7, 10, ... filled;
and data server 3's file will have stripe units 2,
5, 8, 11, ... filled. The unfilled stripe units of
each file will be holes; hence, the files in each data
server are sparse.
</t>
<t>
If sparse packing is being used and a client attempts I/O to one of
the holes, then an error <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
returned by the data server. Using the above example, if data server 3 received a READ or WRITE operation for block 4, the data server
would return NFS4ERR_PNFS_IO_HOLE. Thus,
data servers need to understand the striping pattern in order
to support sparse packing.
</t>
<t>
If nfl_util &amp; NFL4_UFLG_DENSE is one, this means that
dense packing is being used, and the data server files have no holes.
Dense packing might be selected because the data server does not
(efficiently) support holey files or because the data server
cannot recognize read-ahead unless there are no holes.
If dense packing is indicated in the layout,
the data files will be packed. Using the
same striping pattern and stripe unit size that were used for
the sparse packing example, the corresponding dense packing example would have
all stripe units of all data files filled as follows:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Logical stripe units 0, 3, 6, ... of the file would live on
stripe units 0, 1, 2, ... of the file of data server 1.
</li>
<li>
Logical stripe units 1, 4, 7, ... of the file would live on
stripe units 0, 1, 2, ... of the file of data server 2.
</li>
<li>
Logical stripe units 2, 5, 8, ... of the file would live on
stripe units 0, 1, 2, ... of the file of data server 3.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Because dense packing does not leave holes on the data servers,
the pNFS client is allowed to write to any offset of any data file of
any data server in the stripe. Thus, the data servers need not know
the file's striping pattern.
</t>
<t>
The calculation to determine the byte offset within the data file
for dense data server layouts is:
</t>
<sourcecode type="pseudocode"><![CDATA[
stripe_width = stripe_unit_size * N;
where N = number of elements in nflda_stripe_indices.
relative_offset = file_offset - nfl_pattern_offset;
data_file_offset = floor(relative_offset / stripe_width)
* stripe_unit_size
+ relative_offset % stripe_unit_size]]></sourcecode>
<t>
If dense packing is being used, and a data server appears
more than once in a striping pattern, then to distinguish
one stripe unit from another, the data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use a
different filehandle. Let's suppose there are two data
servers. Logical stripe units 0, 3, 6 are served by
data server 1; logical stripe units 1, 4, 7 are served
by data server 2; and logical stripe units 2, 5, 8 are
also served by data server 2. Unless data server 2 has
two filehandles (each referring to a different data
file), then, for example, a write to logical stripe
unit 1 overwrites the write to logical stripe unit 2
because both logical stripe units are located in the
same stripe unit (0) of data server 2.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] "Interpreting the File Layout" anchor="file_layout_interpret" -->
<section anchor="file_multipath" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Server Multipathing</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 file layout supports multipathing to
multiple data server addresses.
Data-server-level multipathing is used for
bandwidth scaling via trunking (<xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>) and for higher availability of use in the case of
a data-server failure. Multipathing allows the client
to switch to another data server address which may be that
of another data server that is exporting the
same data stripe unit, without having to contact the
metadata server for a new layout.
</t>
<t>
To support data server multipathing, each element of
the nflda_multipath_ds_list contains an array of one
more data server network addresses. This array (data
type multipath_list4) represents a list of data servers
(each identified by a network address), with the possibility
that some data servers will appear in the list multiple times.
</t>
<t>
The client is free to use any of the network addresses
as a destination to send data server requests. If some
network addresses are less optimal paths to the data than
others, then the MDS <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> include those network
addresses in an element of nflda_multipath_ds_list. If
less optimal network addresses exist to provide failover, the
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> method to offer the addresses is
to provide them in a replacement device-ID-to-device-address
mapping, or a replacement device ID. When
a client finds that no data server in an element of
nflda_multipath_ds_list responds, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send a
GETDEVICEINFO to attempt to replace the existing
device-ID-to-device-address mappings. If the MDS detects
that all data servers represented by an element of
nflda_multipath_ds_list are unavailable, the MDS <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
send a CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID (if the client has indicated
it wants device ID notifications for changed device IDs)
to change the device-ID-to-device-address mappings to
the available data servers. If the device ID itself will
be replaced, the MDS <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> recall all layouts with the
device ID, and thus force the client to get new layouts
and device ID mappings via LAYOUTGET and GETDEVICEINFO.
</t>
<t>
Generally, if two network addresses appear in an element
of nflda_multipath_ds_list, they will designate the same
data server, and the two data server addresses will
support the implementation of
client ID or session trunking (the latter is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>)
as defined in <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>. The two
data server addresses will share the same server owner
or major ID of the server owner. It is not always necessary for the
two data server addresses to designate the same server
with trunking being used. For example,
the data could be read-only, and the data consist of
exact replicas.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="ds_ops" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operations Sent to NFSv4.1 Data Servers</name>
<t>
Clients accessing data on an NFSv4.1 data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send
only the NULL procedure and COMPOUND procedures whose
operations are taken only from two restricted
subsets of the operations defined as valid NFSv4.1
operations. Clients <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the filehandle specified
by the layout when accessing data on NFSv4.1 data
servers.
</t>
<t>
The first of these operation subsets consists of management operations.
This subset consists of the BACKCHANNEL_CTL, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, CREATE_SESSION,
DESTROY_CLIENTID, DESTROY_SESSION, EXCHANGE_ID,
SECINFO_NO_NAME, SET_SSV, and SEQUENCE operations.
The client may use these operations in order to set
up and maintain the appropriate client IDs,
sessions, and security contexts involved in communication with the data
server. Henceforth, these will be referred to as
data-server housekeeping operations.
</t>
<t>
The second subset consists of COMMIT, READ, WRITE, and PUTFH.
These operations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used with a current filehandle specified by the
layout. In the case of PUTFH, the new current filehandle <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
one taken from the layout. Henceforth, these will be referred to as data-server
I/O operations. As described in <xref target="layout_semantics" format="default"/>,
a client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> send an I/O to a data server for which it does not hold a
valid layout; the data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reject such an I/O.
</t>
<t>
Unless the server has a concurrent non-data-server
personality -- i.e., EXCHANGE_ID results returned
(EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS | EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS)
or (EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS | EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS) see
<xref target="pnfs_session_stuff" format="default"/> -- any attempted use of
operations against a data server other than those specified in the two
subsets above <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP to the client.
</t>
<t>
When the server has concurrent data-server and
non-data-server personalities, each COMPOUND sent by the
client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be constructed
so that it is appropriate to one of the two personalities, and it
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> contain operations directed to a mix of those
personalities. The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> enforce this. To understand
the constraints, operations within a COMPOUND are divided into
the following three classes:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
An operation that is ambiguous regarding its personality
assignment. This includes all of the data-server
housekeeping operations. Additionally, if the
server has assigned filehandles so that the ones defined
by the layout are the same as those used by the metadata
server, all operations using such filehandles are within this
class, with the following exception. The exception is
that if the operation uses a stateid that is incompatible with a
data-server personality (e.g., a special stateid or the
stateid has a non-zero "seqid" field, see
<xref target="global_stateid" format="default"/>), the operation is in class 3,
as described below. A COMPOUND containing
multiple class 1 operations (and operations of no other
class) <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be sent to a server with multiple concurrent data server
and non-data-server personalities.
</li>
<li>
An operation that is unambiguously referable to the data-server
personality. This includes data-server I/O operations where the
filehandle is one that can only be validly directed to the
data-server personality.
</li>
<li>
An operation that is unambiguously referable to the non-data-server
personality. This includes all COMPOUND operations that are
neither data-server housekeeping nor data-server I/O
operations, plus data-server I/O operations where the
current fh (or the one to be made the current fh in the
case of PUTFH) is only valid on the metadata
server or where a stateid is used that is incompatible
with the data server, i.e., is a special stateid or has
a non-zero seqid value.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
When a COMPOUND first executes an operation from class 3 above,
it acts as a normal COMPOUND on any other server, and the
data-server personality ceases to be relevant.
There are no special restrictions on the
operations in the COMPOUND to limit them to those for
a data server. When a PUTFH is done, filehandles
derived from the layout are not valid. If their format
is not normally acceptable, then NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
result. Similarly, current filehandles for other operations
do not accept filehandles derived from layouts and are not
normally usable on the metadata server. Using these
will result in NFS4ERR_STALE.
</t>
<t>
When a COMPOUND first executes an operation from class 2,
which would be PUTFH where the filehandle
is one from a layout, the COMPOUND henceforth is interpreted
with respect to the data-server personality.
Operations outside the two classes discussed
above <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> result in NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP. Filehandles
are validated using the rules of the data server,
resulting in NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE and/or NFS4ERR_STALE
even when they would not normally do so when addressed
to the non-data-server personality. Stateids must obey
the rules of the data server in that any use of special
stateids or stateids with non-zero seqid values must
result in NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.
</t>
<t>
Until the server first executes an operation from class 2
or class 3, the client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> depend on the operation
being executed by either the data-server or the non-data-server
personality. The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> pick one personality consistently
for a given COMPOUND, with the only possible transition being
a single one when the first operation from class 2 or class 3
is executed.
</t>
<t>
Because of the complexity induced by assigning filehandles so
they can be used on both a data server and a metadata server, it
is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that where the same server can have both
personalities, the server assign separate unique filehandles
to both personalities. This makes it unambiguous for which server
a given request is intended.
</t>
<t>
GETATTR and SETATTR <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be directed to the metadata
server. In the case of a SETATTR of the size attribute,
the control protocol is responsible for propagating size
updates/truncations to the data servers. In the case of
extending WRITEs to the data servers, the new size must
be visible on the metadata server once a LAYOUTCOMMIT
has completed (see <xref target="general_layoutcommit" format="default"/>). <xref target="component_file_size" format="default"/> describes the
mechanism by which the client is to handle data-server
files that do not reflect the metadata server's size.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="commit_thru_mds" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>COMMIT through Metadata Server</name>
<t>
The file layout provides two alternate means of providing for the
commit of data written through data servers. The flag
NFL4_UFLG_COMMIT_THRU_MDS in the field nfl_util of the file layout
(data type nfsv4_1_file_layout4)
is an indication
from the metadata server to the client of the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> way of
performing COMMIT, either by sending the COMMIT to the data server
or the metadata server. These two methods of dealing with the issue
correspond to broad styles of implementation for a pNFS server
supporting the file layout type.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When the flag is FALSE, COMMIT operations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> to be sent
to the data server to which the corresponding WRITE operations were
sent. This approach
is sometimes useful when file striping is implemented within the
pNFS server (instead of the file system),
with the individual data servers each implementing
their own file systems.
</li>
<li>
<t>
When the flag is TRUE, COMMIT operations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be sent to the
metadata server, rather than to the individual data servers.
This approach is sometimes useful when file striping
is implemented within the clustered file system that is the backend
to the pNFS server. In such
an implementation, each COMMIT to each
data server might result in repeated writes of metadata
blocks to the
detriment of write performance. Sending a single COMMIT
to the metadata server can be more efficient
when there exists a clustered file
system capable of implementing such a coordinated COMMIT.
</t>
<t>
If nfl_util &amp; NFL4_UFLG_COMMIT_THRU_MDS is TRUE,
then in order to maintain the current NFSv4.1 commit and
recovery model, the data servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return a common
writeverf verifier in all WRITE responses for a given file
layout, and the metadata server's COMMIT implementation
must return the same writeverf. The value of the
writeverf verifier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be changed at the metadata server
or any data server that is referenced in the layout,
whenever there is a server event that can possibly lead to
loss of uncommitted data. The scope of the verifier can
be for a file or for the entire pNFS server. It might be
more difficult for the server to maintain the verifier
at the file level, but the benefit is that only events
that impact a given file will require recovery action.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that if the layout specified dense packing, then the
offset used to a COMMIT to the MDS may differ than that of
an offset used to a COMMIT to the data server.
</t>
<t>
The single COMMIT to the metadata server will return a verifier, and
the client should compare it to all the verifiers from the WRITEs and
fail the COMMIT if there are any mismatched verifiers. If COMMIT to the
metadata server fails, the client should re-send WRITEs for all the
modified data in the file. The client should treat modified data with
a mismatched verifier
as a WRITE failure and try to recover by resending the WRITEs to the
original data server or using another path to that data if the layout
has not been recalled. Alternatively, the client can obtain
a new layout or it could rewrite the data directly to the metadata server. If
nfl_util &amp; NFL4_UFLG_COMMIT_THRU_MDS is FALSE, sending
a COMMIT to the metadata server might have no effect. If
nfl_util &amp; NFL4_UFLG_COMMIT_THRU_MDS is FALSE, a COMMIT
sent to the metadata server should be used only to commit data that
was written to the metadata server. See <xref target="storage_device_recovery" format="default"/>
for recovery options.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The Layout Iomode</name>
<t>
The layout iomode need not be used by the metadata server when
servicing NFSv4.1 file-based layouts, although in some circumstances
it may be useful. For example, if the server implementation
supports reading from read-only replicas or mirrors, it would be
useful for the server to return a layout enabling the client to do
so. As such, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set the iomode based on its intent
to read or write the data. The client may default to an iomode of
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW. The iomode need not be checked by the
data servers when clients perform I/O. However, the data servers
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> still validate that the client holds a valid layout
and return an error if the client does not.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Metadata and Data Server State Coordination</name>
<section anchor="global_stateid" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Global Stateid Requirements</name>
<t>
When the client sends
I/O to a data server, the stateid used <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be a layout stateid
as returned by LAYOUTGET or sent by CB_LAYOUTRECALL.
Permitted stateids are based on one of the following:
an OPEN stateid
(the stateid field of data type OPEN4resok as returned by OPEN),
a delegation stateid (the stateid field of data types open_read_delegation4
and open_write_delegation4 as returned by OPEN or WANT_DELEGATION,
or as sent by CB_PUSH_DELEG), or a stateid returned by the LOCK or LOCKU
operations. The stateid sent to the data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be sent with
the seqid set to zero, indicating the most current version of that
stateid, rather than indicating a specific non-zero seqid value. In
no case is the use of special stateid values allowed.
</t>
<t>
The stateid used for I/O <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have the same
effect and be subject to the same validation on a data server as it
would if the I/O was being performed on the metadata server itself
in the absence of pNFS. This has the implication that stateids are
globally valid on both the metadata and data servers. This
requires the metadata server to propagate changes in LOCK and OPEN
state to the data servers, so that the data servers can
validate I/O accesses. This is discussed further in <xref target="state_propagation" format="default"/>. Depending on when stateids are
propagated, the existence of a valid stateid on the data server
may act as proof of a valid layout.
</t>
<t>
Clients performing I/O operations need to select an appropriate
stateid based on the
locks (including opens and delegations) held by the client and
the various types of state-owners sending the I/O requests. The
rules for doing so when referencing data servers are somewhat
different from those discussed in <xref target="stateid_use" format="default"/>,
which apply when accessing metadata servers.
</t>
<t>
The following rules, applied in order of decreasing priority, govern
the selection of the appropriate stateid:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the client holds a delegation for the file in question, the
delegation stateid should be used.
</li>
<li>
Otherwise, there must be an OPEN stateid for the current
open-owner, and that
OPEN stateid for the open file in question is used, unless
mandatory locking prevents that. See below.
</li>
<li>
If the data server had previously responded with NFS4ERR_LOCKED
to use of the OPEN stateid, then the client should use the
byte-range lock stateid whenever one exists for that open file
with the current lock-owner.
</li>
<li>
Special stateids should never be used. If they are used, the data
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reject the I/O with an NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID error.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="state_propagation" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Server State Propagation</name>
<t>
Since the metadata server, which handles byte-range lock and
open-mode state changes as well as ACLs, might not be
co-located with the data servers where I/O accesses
are validated, the server implementation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> take
care of propagating changes of this state to the data
servers. Once the propagation to the data servers is
complete, the full effect of those changes <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be in
effect at the data servers. However, some state changes
need not be propagated immediately, although all changes
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be propagated promptly. These state propagations
have an impact on the design of the control protocol,
even though the control protocol is outside of the scope
of this specification. Immediate propagation refers to
the synchronous propagation of state from the metadata
server to the data server(s); the propagation must be
complete before returning to the client.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Lock State Propagation</name>
<t>
If the pNFS server supports mandatory byte-range locking, any mandatory byte-range locks
on a file <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be made effective at the data servers before
the request that establishes them returns to the caller. The
effect <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same as if the mandatory byte-range lock state were
synchronously propagated to the data servers, even though the
details of the control protocol may avoid actual transfer of the
state under certain circumstances.
</t>
<t>
On the other hand, since
advisory byte-range lock state is not used for checking I/O accesses at
the data servers, there is no semantic reason for propagating
advisory byte-range lock state to the data servers.
Since updates to advisory locks neither confer nor remove
privileges, these changes need not be propagated immediately, and
may not need to be propagated promptly. The updates to advisory
locks need only be propagated when the data server needs to
resolve a question about a stateid. In fact, if byte-range locking
is not mandatory (i.e., is advisory) the clients are advised to avoid
using the byte-range lock-based stateids for I/O. The stateids returned by
OPEN are sufficient and eliminate overhead for this kind of state
propagation.
</t>
<t>
If a client gets back an NFS4ERR_LOCKED error from a
data server, this is an indication that mandatory byte-range
locking is in force. The client recovers from this by
getting a byte-range lock that covers the affected range
and re-sends the I/O with the stateid of the byte-range lock.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Open and Deny Mode Validation</name>
<t>
Open and deny mode validation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be performed against
the open and deny mode(s) held by the data servers. When
access is reduced or a deny mode made more restrictive
(because of CLOSE or OPEN_DOWNGRADE), the data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
prevent any I/Os that would be denied if performed on the
metadata server. When access is expanded,
the data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> make sure that no requests are
subsequently rejected because of
open or deny issues that no longer apply, given the
previous relaxation.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File Attributes</name>
<t>
Since the SETATTR operation has the ability to modify state that is
visible on both the metadata and data servers (e.g., the size),
care must be taken to ensure that the resultant state across the
set of data servers is consistent, especially when truncating or
growing the file.
</t>
<t>
As described earlier, the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation is used to ensure
that the metadata is synchronized with changes made to the data servers. For the NFSv4.1‑based data storage protocol,
it is necessary to re-synchronize
state such as the size attribute, and the setting of mtime/change/atime.
See <xref target="committing_layout" format="default"/> for a full
description of the semantics regarding LAYOUTCOMMIT and
attribute synchronization. It should be noted that by
using an NFSv4.1-based layout type, it is possible to
synchronize this state before LAYOUTCOMMIT occurs. For
example, the control protocol can be used to query the
attributes present on the data servers.
</t>
<t>
Any changes to file attributes that control authorization or
access as reflected by ACCESS calls or READs and WRITEs on the
metadata server, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be propagated to the data servers for
enforcement on READ and WRITE I/O calls. If the changes made on the
metadata server result in more restrictive access permissions for
any user, those changes <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be propagated to the data servers
synchronously.
</t>
<t>
The OPEN operation (<xref target="OP_OPEN_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>) does not impose any requirement that I/O operations
on an open file have the same credentials as the OPEN
itself (unless EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID is
set when EXCHANGE_ID creates the client ID), and so it
requires the server's READ and WRITE operations to
perform appropriate access checking. Changes to ACLs
also require new access checking by READ and WRITE on
the server. The propagation of access-right changes due
to changes in ACLs may be asynchronous only if the server
implementation is able to determine that the updated
ACL is not more restrictive for any user specified in
the old ACL. Due to the relative infrequency of ACL
updates, it is suggested that all changes be propagated
synchronously.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="component_file_size" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Data Server Component File Size</name>
<t>
A potential problem exists when a component data file on a
particular data server has grown past EOF; the problem exists for
both dense and sparse layouts. Imagine the following scenario: a
client creates a new file (size == 0) and writes to byte 131072; the
client then seeks to the beginning of the file and reads byte 100.
The client should receive zeroes back as a result of the READ. However,
if the striping pattern directs the client to send the READ to
a data server other than the one that received the
client's original WRITE, the data server servicing the READ may
believe that the file's size is still 0 bytes. In that event, the
data server's READ response will contain zero bytes and an
indication of EOF. The data server can only return zeroes if it knows that
the file's size has been extended. This would require the immediate
propagation of the file's size to all data servers, which is
potentially very costly. Therefore, the client that has
initiated the extension of the file's size <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be prepared to deal
with these EOF conditions.
When the offset in the arguments to READ
is less than the client's view of the file size, if the READ response
indicates EOF and/or contains fewer bytes than requested, the client
will interpret such a response as a hole in the file, and the
NFS client will substitute zeroes for the data.
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol only provides close-to-open file data cache
semantics; meaning that when the file is closed, all modified data is
written to the server. When a subsequent OPEN of the file is
done, the change attribute is inspected for a difference from a
cached value for the change attribute. For the case above, this means
that a LAYOUTCOMMIT will be done at close (along with the data
WRITEs) and will update the file's size and change attribute. Access
from another client after that point will result in the appropriate
size being returned.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="file_layout_revoke" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout Revocation and Fencing</name>
<t>
As described in <xref target="crash_recovery" format="default"/>, the
layout-type-specific storage protocol is responsible
for handling the effects of I/Os that started before
lease expiration and extend through lease expiration.
The LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES layout type
can prevent all I/Os to data servers from
being executed after lease expiration (this prevention is
called "fencing"), without relying
on a precise client lease timer and without requiring
data servers to maintain lease timers. The
LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES pNFS server has the flexibility to
revoke individual layouts, and thus fence I/O on a per-file
basis.
</t>
<t>
In addition to lease expiration,
the reasons a layout can be revoked include: client fails to respond to
a CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
the
metadata server restarts, or administrative intervention. Regardless
of the reason, once a client's layout has been revoked, the pNFS
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> prevent the client from sending I/O for the affected file
from and to all data servers; in other words, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> fence the
client from the affected file on the data servers.
</t>
<t>
Fencing works as follows. As described in <xref target="pnfs_session_stuff" format="default"/>, in COMPOUND procedure
requests to the data server, the data filehandle provided
by the PUTFH operation and the stateid in the READ or
WRITE operation are used to ensure that the client has
a valid layout for the I/O being performed; if it does
not, the I/O is rejected with NFS4ERR_PNFS_NO_LAYOUT.
The server can simply check the stateid and, additionally,
make the data filehandle stale if the layout specified
a data filehandle that is different from the metadata server's
filehandle for the file (see the nfl_fh_list description in
<xref target="file_data_types" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
Before the metadata server takes any action to revoke
layout state given out by a previous instance, it must make
sure that all layout state from that previous instance are
invalidated at the data servers. This has the following
implications.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The metadata server must not restripe a
file until it has contacted all of the data servers
to invalidate the layouts from the previous instance.
</li>
<li>
The metadata server must not give out mandatory locks that conflict with
layouts from the previous instance without either doing
a specific layout invalidation (as it would have to do anyway)
or doing a global data server invalidation.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="file_security_considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Considerations for the File Layout Type</name>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 file layout type <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> adhere to the security
considerations outlined in <xref target="security_considerations_pnfs" format="default"/>. NFSv4.1 data servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> make all of the
required access checks on each READ or WRITE I/O as determined by
the NFSv4.1 protocol.
If the metadata server would deny a READ or WRITE
operation on a file due to its ACL, mode attribute, open
access mode, open deny mode, mandatory byte-range lock state, or any other
attributes and state, the data server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> also deny the
READ or WRITE operation. This impacts the control
protocol and the propagation of state from the metadata
server to the data servers; see <xref target="state_propagation" format="default"/> for more details.
</t>
<t>
The methods for authentication,
integrity, and privacy for data servers based on the
LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES layout type are the same as those used
by metadata servers. Metadata and data servers
use ONC RPC security flavors to
authenticate, and SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME
to negotiate the security mechanism and services
to be used. Thus, when using the LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES layout type,
the impact on the RPC-based security
model due to pNFS (as alluded to in Sections
<xref target="rpc_and_security" format="counter"/>
and <xref target="parallel_access" format="counter"/>) is zero.
</t>
<t>
For a given file object, a metadata server
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> require different security parameters
(secinfo4 value) than the data server.
For a given file object with multiple data servers,
the secinfo4 value <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be the same across
all data servers. If the secinfo4 values across a metadata server
and its data servers differ for a specific file, the
mapping of the principal to the server's internal user identifier
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same in order for the access-control checks based on
ACL, mode, open and deny mode, and mandatory locking to be
consistent across on the pNFS server.
</t>
<t>
If an NFSv4.1 implementation supports
pNFS and supports NFSv4.1 file layouts, then the
implementation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the SECINFO_NO_NAME operation on both
the metadata and data servers.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="internationalization" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Internationalization</name>
<t>
The primary issue in which NFSv4.1 needs to deal with
internationalization, or I18N, is with respect to file names and other
strings as used within the protocol. The choice of string
representation must allow reasonable name/string access to clients
that use various languages. The UTF-8 encoding of the UCS (Universal
Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set) as defined
by <xref target="ISO.10646-1.1993" format="default">ISO10646</xref> allows for this type
of access and follows the policy described in "IETF Policy on
Character Sets and Languages", <xref target="RFC2277" format="default">RFC 2277</xref>.
</t>
<t>
<xref target="RFC3454" format="default">RFC 3454</xref>, otherwise known as "stringprep", documents a
framework for using Unicode/UTF-8 in networking protocols so as "to
increase the likelihood that string input and string comparison work
in ways that make sense for typical users throughout the world". A
protocol must define a profile of stringprep "in order to fully
specify the processing options". The remainder of this
section defines the NFSv4.1 stringprep profiles. Much of the terminology
used for the remainder of this section comes from stringprep.
</t>
<t>
There are three UTF-8 string types defined for NFSv4.1:
utf8str_cs, utf8str_cis, and utf8str_mixed. Separate profiles are
defined for each. Each profile defines the following, as required by
stringprep:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The intended applicability of the profile.
</li>
<li>
The character repertoire that is the input and output to stringprep
(which is Unicode 3.2 for the referenced version of stringprep).
However, NFSv4.1 implementations are not limited to 3.2.
</li>
<li>
The mapping tables from stringprep used (as described in Section
<xref target="RFC3454" sectionFormat="bare" section="3"/> of stringprep).
</li>
<li>
Any additional mapping tables specific to the profile.
</li>
<li>
The Unicode normalization used, if any (as described in Section
<xref target="RFC3454" sectionFormat="bare" section="4"/> of stringprep).
</li>
<li>
The tables from the stringprep listing of characters that are prohibited
as output (as described in Section <xref target="RFC3454" sectionFormat="bare" section="5"/> of stringprep).
</li>
<li>
The bidirectional string testing used, if any (as described in Section <xref target="RFC3454" sectionFormat="bare" section="6"/> of stringprep).
</li>
<li>
Any additional characters that are prohibited as output specific to
the profile.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Stringprep discusses Unicode characters, whereas NFSv4.1 renders
UTF-8 characters. Since there is a one-to-one mapping from UTF-8 to
Unicode, when the remainder of this document refers to Unicode,
the reader should assume UTF-8.
</t>
<t>
Much of the text for the profiles comes from RFC 3491 <xref target="RFC3491" format="default"/>.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stringprep Profile for the utf8str_cs Type</name>
<t>
Every use of the utf8str_cs type definition in the NFSv4 protocol specification follows the profile named
nfs4_cs_prep.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Intended Applicability of the nfs4_cs_prep Profile</name>
<t>
The utf8str_cs type is a case-sensitive string of UTF-8 characters.
Its primary use in NFSv4.1 is for naming components and
pathnames. Components and pathnames are stored on the server's
file system. Two valid distinct UTF-8 strings might be the same after
processing via the utf8str_cs profile. If the strings are two names
inside a directory, the NFSv4.1 server will need to either:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
disallow the creation of a second name if its post-processed form
collides with that of an existing name, or
</li>
<li>
allow the creation of the second name, but arrange so that after
post-processing, the second name is different than the post-processed
form of the first name.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Character Repertoire of nfs4_cs_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cs_prep profile uses Unicode 3.2, as defined in stringprep's
Appendix A.1.
However, NFSv4.1 implementations are not limited to 3.2.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Mapping Used by nfs4_cs_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cs_prep profile specifies mapping using the
following tables from stringprep:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
Table B.1
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Table B.2 is normally not part of the nfs4_cs_prep profile as it is
primarily for dealing with case-insensitive comparisons. However, if
the NFSv4.1 file server supports the case_insensitive file system
attribute, and if case_insensitive is TRUE, the NFSv4.1 server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use Table B.2 (in addition to Table B1) when processing
utf8str_cs strings, and the NFSv4.1 client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> assume Table B.2
(in addition to Table B.1) is being used.
</t>
<t>
If the case_preserving attribute is present and set to FALSE, then the
NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use Table B.2 to map case when processing
utf8str_cs strings. Whether the server maps from lower to upper case
or from upper to lower case is an implementation dependency.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Normalization used by nfs4_cs_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cs_prep profile does not specify a normalization form. A
later revision of this specification may specify a particular
normalization form. Therefore, the server and client can expect that
they may receive unnormalized characters within protocol requests and
responses. If the operating environment requires normalization, then
the implementation must normalize utf8str_cs strings within the
protocol before presenting the information to an application (at the
client) or local file system (at the server).
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Prohibited Output for nfs4_cs_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cs_prep profile RECOMMENDS prohibiting the use of the
following tables from stringprep:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>Table C.5</li>
<li>Table C.6</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Bidirectional Output for nfs4_cs_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cs_prep profile does not specify any checking of
bidirectional strings.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stringprep Profile for the utf8str_cis Type</name>
<t>
Every use of the utf8str_cis type definition in the NFSv4.1
protocol specification follows the profile named nfs4_cis_prep.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Intended Applicability of the nfs4_cis_prep Profile</name>
<t>
The utf8str_cis type is a case-insensitive string of
UTF-8 characters. Its primary use in NFSv4.1 is
for naming NFS servers.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Character Repertoire of nfs4_cis_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cis_prep profile uses Unicode 3.2, as defined in stringprep's
Appendix A.1. However, NFSv4.1 implementations are not limited to 3.2.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Mapping Used by nfs4_cis_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cis_prep profile specifies mapping using the following tables from
stringprep:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>Table B.1</li>
<li>Table B.2</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Normalization Used by nfs4_cis_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cis_prep profile specifies using Unicode normalization form
KC, as described in stringprep.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Prohibited Output for nfs4_cis_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cis_prep profile specifies prohibiting using the following
tables from stringprep:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>Table C.1.2</li>
<li>Table C.2.2</li>
<li>Table C.3</li>
<li>Table C.4</li>
<li>Table C.5</li>
<li>Table C.6</li>
<li>Table C.7</li>
<li>Table C.8</li>
<li>Table C.9</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Bidirectional Output for nfs4_cis_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_cis_prep profile specifies checking bidirectional strings as
described in stringprep's Section <xref target="RFC3454" sectionFormat="bare" section="6"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Stringprep Profile for the utf8str_mixed Type</name>
<t>
Every use of the utf8str_mixed type definition in the NFSv4.1
protocol specification follows the profile named nfs4_mixed_prep.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Intended Applicability of the nfs4_mixed_prep Profile</name>
<t>
The utf8str_mixed type is a string of UTF-8 characters, with a prefix
that is case sensitive, a separator equal to '@', and a suffix that is a
fully qualified domain name. Its primary use in NFSv4.1 is for
naming principals identified in an Access Control Entry.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Character Repertoire of nfs4_mixed_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_mixed_prep profile uses Unicode 3.2, as defined in
stringprep's Appendix A.1.
However, NFSv4.1 implementations are not limited to 3.2.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Mapping Used by nfs4_cis_prep</name>
<t>
For the prefix and the separator of a utf8str_mixed
string, the nfs4_mixed_prep profile specifies mapping
using the following table from stringprep:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>Table B.1</li>
</ul>
<t>
For the suffix of a utf8str_mixed string, the nfs4_mixed_prep
profile specifies mapping using the following tables from
stringprep:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>Table B.1</li>
<li>Table B.2</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Normalization Used by nfs4_mixed_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_mixed_prep profile specifies using Unicode normalization form
KC, as described in stringprep.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Prohibited Output for nfs4_mixed_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_mixed_prep profile specifies prohibiting using the
following tables from stringprep:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>Table C.1.2</li>
<li>Table C.2.2</li>
<li>Table C.3</li>
<li>Table C.4</li>
<li>Table C.5</li>
<li>Table C.6</li>
<li>Table C.7</li>
<li>Table C.8</li>
<li>Table C.9</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Bidirectional Output for nfs4_mixed_prep</name>
<t>
The nfs4_mixed_prep profile specifies checking bidirectional strings
as described in stringprep's Section <xref target="RFC3454" sectionFormat="bare" section="6"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="utf8_caps" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>UTF-8 Capabilities</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const FSCHARSET_CAP4_CONTAINS_NON_UTF8 = 0x1;
const FSCHARSET_CAP4_ALLOWS_ONLY_UTF8 = 0x2;
typedef uint32_t fs_charset_cap4;]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Because some operating environments and file systems do
not enforce character set encodings, NFSv4.1 supports the
fs_charset_cap attribute (<xref target="attrdef_fs_charset_cap" format="default"/>)
that indicates to the client a file system's UTF-8 capabilities.
The attribute is an integer containing a pair of flags.
The first flag is FSCHARSET_CAP4_CONTAINS_NON_UTF8, which, if set
to one, tells the client that the file system contains non-UTF-8 characters,
and the server will not convert non-UTF characters to UTF-8 if the client
reads a symbolic link or directory, neither will operations with component
names or pathnames in the arguments convert the strings to UTF-8.
The second flag is FSCHARSET_CAP4_ALLOWS_ONLY_UTF8, which, if set to
one, indicates that the server will accept (and generate) only
UTF-8 characters on the file system. If
FSCHARSET_CAP4_ALLOWS_ONLY_UTF8 is set to one,
FSCHARSET_CAP4_CONTAINS_NON_UTF8 <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to zero.
FSCHARSET_CAP4_ALLOWS_ONLY_UTF8 <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> always be set to one.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="utf8_related_errors" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>UTF-8 Related Errors</name>
<t>
Where the client sends an invalid UTF-8 string, the server should
return NFS4ERR_INVAL (see <xref target="error_definitions" format="default"/>).
This includes cases in which inappropriate prefixes are detected and
where the count includes trailing bytes that do not constitute a full
UCS character.
</t>
<t>
Where the client-supplied string is valid UTF-8 but contains
characters that are not supported by the server as a value for that
string (e.g., names containing characters outside of Unicode plane 0 on
file systems that fail to support such characters despite their
presence in the Unicode standard), the server should return
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR.
</t>
<t>
Where a UTF-8 string is used as a file name, and the file system (while
supporting all of the characters within the name) does not allow that
particular name to be used, the server should return the error <xref target="error_definitions" format="default">NFS4ERR_BADNAME</xref>. This includes
situations in which the server file system imposes a normalization
constraint on name strings, but will also include such situations as
file system prohibitions of "." and ".." as file names for certain
operations, and other such constraints.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Error Values</name>
<t>
NFS error numbers are assigned to failed operations within a
Compound (COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND) request. A Compound request
contains a number of NFS operations that have their results
encoded in sequence in a Compound reply. The results of successful
operations will consist of an NFS4_OK status followed by the
encoded results of the operation. If an NFS operation fails, an
error status will be entered in the reply and the Compound
request will be terminated.
</t>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Error Definitions</name>
<table anchor="error_definitions" align="center">
<name> Protocol Error Definitions</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Error</th>
<th align="left">Number</th>
<th align="left">Description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4_OK</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_OK" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ACCESS</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_ACCESS" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP</td>
<td align="left">10032</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_ATTRNOTSUPP" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED</td>
<td align="left">10047</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_ADMIN_REVOKED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BACK_CHAN_BUSY</td>
<td align="left">10057</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BACK_CHAN_BUSY" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADCHAR</td>
<td align="left">10040</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADCHAR" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE</td>
<td align="left">10001</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADHANDLE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE</td>
<td align="left">10049</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADIOMODE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT</td>
<td align="left">10050</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADLAYOUT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADNAME</td>
<td align="left">10041</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADNAME" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADOWNER</td>
<td align="left">10039</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADOWNER" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADSESSION</td>
<td align="left">10052</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADSESSION" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADSLOT</td>
<td align="left">10053</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADSLOT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADTYPE</td>
<td align="left">10007</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADTYPE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADXDR</td>
<td align="left">10036</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BADXDR" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_COOKIE</td>
<td align="left">10003</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BAD_COOKIE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_HIGH_SLOT</td>
<td align="left">10077</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BAD_HIGH_SLOT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE</td>
<td align="left">10042</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BAD_RANGE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_SEQID</td>
<td align="left">10026</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BAD_SEQID" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_SESSION_DIGEST</td>
<td align="left">10051</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BAD_SESSION_DIGEST" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID</td>
<td align="left">10025</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_BAD_STATEID" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN</td>
<td align="left">10048</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_CB_PATH_DOWN" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE</td>
<td align="left">10017</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_CLID_INUSE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY</td>
<td align="left">10074</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_CLIENTID_BUSY" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_COMPLETE_ALREADY</td>
<td align="left">10054</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_COMPLETE_ALREADY" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION</td>
<td align="left">10055</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK</td>
<td align="left">10045</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_DEADLOCK" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION</td>
<td align="left">10078</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_DEADSESSION" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DELAY</td>
<td align="left">10008</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_DELAY" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DELEG_ALREADY_WANTED</td>
<td align="left">10056</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_DELEG_ALREADY_WANTED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED</td>
<td align="left">10087</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_DELEG_REVOKED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DENIED</td>
<td align="left">10010</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_DENIED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DIRDELEG_UNAVAIL</td>
<td align="left">10084</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_DIRDELEG_UNAVAIL" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DQUOT</td>
<td align="left">69</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_DQUOT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP</td>
<td align="left">10079</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_EXIST</td>
<td align="left">17</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_EXIST" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_EXPIRED</td>
<td align="left">10011</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_EXPIRED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_FBIG</td>
<td align="left">27</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_FBIG" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED</td>
<td align="left">10014</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_FHEXPIRED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN</td>
<td align="left">10046</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_FILE_OPEN" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_GRACE</td>
<td align="left">10013</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_GRACE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_HASH_ALG_UNSUPP</td>
<td align="left">10072</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_HASH_ALG_UNSUPP" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_INVAL</td>
<td align="left">22</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_INVAL" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_IO</td>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_IO" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ISDIR</td>
<td align="left">21</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_ISDIR" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER</td>
<td align="left">10058</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_LAYOUTTRYLATER" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LAYOUTUNAVAILABLE</td>
<td align="left">10059</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_LAYOUTUNAVAILABLE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED</td>
<td align="left">10031</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_LEASE_MOVED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LOCKED</td>
<td align="left">10012</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_LOCKED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD</td>
<td align="left">10037</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_LOCKS_HELD" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LOCK_NOTSUPP</td>
<td align="left">10043</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_LOCK_NOTSUPP" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE</td>
<td align="left">10028</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_LOCK_RANGE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH</td>
<td align="left">10021</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_MLINK</td>
<td align="left">31</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_MLINK" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_MOVED</td>
<td align="left">10019</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_MOVED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG</td>
<td align="left">63</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NAMETOOLONG" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOENT</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOENT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE</td>
<td align="left">10020</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOFILEHANDLE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT</td>
<td align="left">10060</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOSPC</td>
<td align="left">28</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOSPC" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOTDIR</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOTDIR" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOTEMPTY</td>
<td align="left">66</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOTEMPTY" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP</td>
<td align="left">10004</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOTSUPP" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP</td>
<td align="left">10081</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOT_ONLY_OP" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME</td>
<td align="left">10027</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NOT_SAME" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE</td>
<td align="left">10033</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NO_GRACE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NXIO</td>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_NXIO" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID</td>
<td align="left">10024</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_OLD_STATEID" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_OPENMODE</td>
<td align="left">10038</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_OPENMODE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL</td>
<td align="left">10044</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_OP_ILLEGAL" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION</td>
<td align="left">10071</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_PERM</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_PERM" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_PNFS_IO_HOLE</td>
<td align="left">10075</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_PNFS_IO_HOLE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_PNFS_NO_LAYOUT</td>
<td align="left">10080</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_PNFS_NO_LAYOUT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT</td>
<td align="left">10061</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_RECALLCONFLICT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD</td>
<td align="left">10034</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_RECLAIM_BAD" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT</td>
<td align="left">10035</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_RECLAIM_CONFLICT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REJECT_DELEG</td>
<td align="left">10085</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_REJECT_DELEG" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG</td>
<td align="left">10066</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_REP_TOO_BIG" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE</td>
<td align="left">10067</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG</td>
<td align="left">10065</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_REQ_TOO_BIG" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RESTOREFH</td>
<td align="left">10030</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_RESTOREFH" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP</td>
<td align="left">10068</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RETURNCONFLICT</td>
<td align="left">10086</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_RETURNCONFLICT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ROFS</td>
<td align="left">30</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_ROFS" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SAME</td>
<td align="left">10009</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_SAME" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SHARE_DENIED</td>
<td align="left">10015</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_SHARE_DENIED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS</td>
<td align="left">10064</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_SEQUENCE_POS" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY</td>
<td align="left">10076</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED</td>
<td align="left">10063</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_SEQ_MISORDERED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT</td>
<td align="left">10006</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_SERVERFAULT" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_STALE</td>
<td align="left">70</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_STALE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID</td>
<td align="left">10022</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_STALE_CLIENTID" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID</td>
<td align="left">10023</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_STALE_STATEID" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SYMLINK</td>
<td align="left">10029</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_SYMLINK" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL</td>
<td align="left">10005</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_TOOSMALL" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS</td>
<td align="left">10070</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_TOO_MANY_OPS" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE</td>
<td align="left">10062</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_UNSAFE_COMPOUND</td>
<td align="left">10069</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_UNSAFE_COMPOUND" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC</td>
<td align="left">10016</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_WRONGSEC" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED</td>
<td align="left">10082</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_WRONG_CRED" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE</td>
<td align="left">10083</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_WRONG_TYPE" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_XDEV</td>
<td align="left">18</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="err_XDEV" format="default"/></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<section anchor="errors_gen" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>General Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with errors that are applicable to a broad
set of different purposes.
</t>
<section anchor="err_BADXDR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADXDR (Error Code 10036)</name>
<t>
The arguments for this operation do not match those specified in
the XDR definition. This includes situations in which the
request ends before all the arguments have been seen. Note
that this error applies when fixed enumerations (these include
booleans) have a value within the input stream that is not
valid for the enum. A replier may pre-parse all operations for
a Compound procedure before doing any operation execution
and return RPC-level XDR errors in that case.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_BAD_COOKIE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BAD_COOKIE (Error Code 10003)</name>
<t>
Used for operations that provide a set of information indexed by
some quantity provided by the client or cookie sent by the
server for an earlier invocation. Where the value cannot
be used for its intended purpose, this error results.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_DELAY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_DELAY (Error Code 10008)</name>
<t>
For any of a number of reasons, the replier could not
process this operation in what was deemed a reasonable
time. The client should wait and then try the request
with a new slot and sequence value.
</t>
<t>
Some examples of scenarios that might lead to this situation:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
A server that supports hierarchical storage receives a
request to process a file that had been migrated.
</li>
<li>
An operation requires a delegation recall to proceed,
but the need to wait for this delegation to be recalled
and returned makes processing this request in a timely fashion impossible.
</li>
<li>
A request is being performed on a session being migrated
from another server as described in <xref target="SEC11-XS-session" format="default"/>,
and the lack of full information about the
state of the session on the source makes it impossible
to process the request immediately.
</li>
</ul>
<!-- [rfced] In Section 15.1.1.3, we're having difficulty parsing
these sentences. Is this a response to a response, or a response
to a response to a response? That is, are the errors found in
responses, or are they found in responses to responses?
Current:
Because of the need to avoid spurious reissues of non-idempotent
operations and to avoid acting in response to NFS4ERR_DELAY
errors returned on responses returned from the replier's reply
cache, integration with the session-provided reply cache is
necessary.
...
In this case, the replier MUST avoid returning a response
containing NFS4ERR_DELAY as the response to SEQUENCE solely on
the basis of its presence in the reply cache.
-->
<t>
In such cases, returning the error NFS4ERR_DELAY allows
necessary preparatory operations to proceed without
holding up requester resources such as a session slot.
After delaying for period of time, the client can
then re-send the operation in question, often as part
of a nearly identical request. Because of the need to avoid
spurious reissues of non-idempotent operations and to avoid
acting in response to NFS4ERR_DELAY errors returned on responses
returned from the replier's reply cache,
integration with the session-provided reply cache is necessary.
There are a number of cases to deal with, each of which requires
different sorts of handling by the requester and replier:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If NFS4ERR_DELAY is returned on a SEQUENCE operation, the
request is retried in full with the SEQUENCE operation
containing the same slot and sequence values. In this case,
the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> avoid returning a response
containing NFS4ERR_DELAY as the response to SEQUENCE solely
because an earlier instance of the same request returned that error
and it was stored in the reply cache. If the replier did this,
the retries would not be effective as there would be no
opportunity for the replier to see whether the condition that
generated the NFS4ERR_DELAY had been rectified during the
interim between the original request and the retry.
</li>
<li>
If NFS4ERR_DELAY is returned on an operation other than SEQUENCE
that validly appears as the first operation of a request, the handling
is similar. The request can be retried in full without modification.
In this case as well,
the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> avoid returning a response containing
NFS4ERR_DELAY as the response to an initial operation of a request
solely on the basis
of its presence in the reply cache. If the replier did this,
the retries would not be effective as there would be no
opportunity for the replier to see whether the condition that
generated the NFS4ERR_DELAY had been rectified during the
interim between the original request and the retry.
</li>
<li>
If NFS4ERR_DELAY is returned on an operation other than the first
in the request, the request when retried <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> contain a SEQUENCE
operation that is different than the original one, with either
the slot ID or the sequence value different from that in the original
request. Because requesters do this, there is no need for the
replier to take special care to avoid returning an
NFS4ERR_DELAY error obtained from the reply cache. When no non-idempotent
operations have been processed before the NFS4ERR_DELAY was returned,
the requester should retry the request in full, with the only
difference from the original request being the modification to the
slot ID or sequence value in the reissued SEQUENCE operation.
</li>
<li>
<t>
When NFS4ERR_DELAY is returned on an operation other than the first
within a request and there has been a non-idempotent operation
processed before the NFS4ERR_DELAY was returned, reissuing the request as is normally
done would incorrectly cause the re-execution of the non-idempotent operation.
</t>
<t>
To avoid this situation, the client should reissue the request without the
non-idempotent operation. The request still must use a SEQUENCE
operation with either a different slot ID or sequence value from
the SEQUENCE in the original request. Because this is done, there
is no way the replier could avoid spuriously re-executing the
non-idempotent operation since the different SEQUENCE parameters
prevent the requester from recognizing that the non-idempotent
operation is being retried.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that without the ability to return NFS4ERR_DELAY and the
requester's willingness to re-send when receiving it, deadlock might
result. For example, if a recall is done, and if the delegation
return or operations preparatory to delegation return are held up by
other operations that need the delegation to be returned,
session slots might not be available. The result could be
deadlock.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_INVAL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_INVAL (Error Code 22)</name>
<t>
The arguments for this operation are not valid for some reason, even
though they do match those specified in the XDR definition for
the request.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOTSUPP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP (Error Code 10004)</name>
<t>
Operation not supported, either because the operation is
an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> one and is not supported by this server or
because the operation <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be implemented in
the current minor version.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_SERVERFAULT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT (Error Code 10006)</name>
<t>
An error occurred on the server that does not map to any of
the specific legal NFSv4.1 protocol error values. The client
should translate this into an appropriate error. UNIX clients
may choose to translate this to EIO.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_TOOSMALL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL (Error Code 10005)</name>
<t>
Used where an operation returns a variable amount of data,
with a limit specified by the client. Where the data
returned cannot be fit within the limit specified by the
client, this error results.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_fh" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Filehandle Errors</name>
<t>
These errors deal with the situation in which the current
or saved filehandle, or the filehandle passed to PUTFH
intended to become the current filehandle, is invalid
in some way. This includes situations in which the
filehandle is a valid filehandle in general but is not
of the appropriate object type for the current operation.
</t>
<t>
Where the error description indicates a problem with the
current or saved filehandle, it is to be understood that
filehandles are only checked for the condition if they
are implicit arguments of the operation in question.
</t>
<section anchor="err_BADHANDLE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE (Error Code 10001)</name>
<t>
Illegal NFS filehandle for the current server. The current
filehandle failed internal consistency checks. Once accepted
as valid (by PUTFH), no subsequent status change can cause the
filehandle to generate this error.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_FHEXPIRED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED (Error Code 10014)</name>
<t>
A current or saved filehandle that is an argument to the
current operation is volatile and has expired at the server.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_ISDIR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_ISDIR (Error Code 21)</name>
<t>
The current or saved filehandle designates a directory
when the current operation does not allow a directory to
be accepted as the target of this operation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_MOVED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_MOVED (Error Code 10019)</name>
<t>
The file system that contains the current filehandle object
is not present at the server or is not accessible with the
network address used. It may have been made accessible on a different
set of network addresses, relocated or
migrated to another server, or it may have never been present.
The client may obtain the new file system location by obtaining
the fs_locations or fs_locations_info attribute for the
current filehandle. For further discussion, refer to
<xref target="presence_or_absence" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
As with the case of NFS4ERR_DELAY, it is possible that one or
more non-idempotent operations may have been successfully executed
within a COMPOUND before NFS4ERR_MOVED is returned. Because of
this, once the new location is determined, the original request
that received the NFS4ERR_MOVED should not be re-executed in full.
Instead, the client should send a new COMPOUND with any successfully
executed non-idempotent
operations removed. When the client uses the same session for the
new COMPOUND, its SEQUENCE operation should use a different slot ID or sequence.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOFILEHANDLE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE (Error Code 10020)</name>
<t>
The logical current or saved filehandle value is required by
the current operation and is not set.
This may be a result of a malformed COMPOUND
operation (i.e., no PUTFH or PUTROOTFH before an operation that
requires the current filehandle be set).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOTDIR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOTDIR (Error Code 20)</name>
<t>
The current (or saved) filehandle designates an object that
is not a directory for an operation in which a directory is
required.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_STALE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_STALE (Error Code 70)</name>
<t>
The current or saved filehandle value designating an argument
to the current operation is invalid. The file referred to by
that filehandle no longer exists or access to it has been
revoked.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_SYMLINK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_SYMLINK (Error Code 10029)</name>
<t>
The current filehandle designates a symbolic link when the
current operation does not allow a symbolic link as the
target.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_WRONG_TYPE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE (Error Code 10083)</name>
<t>
The current (or saved) filehandle designates an object that
is of an invalid type for the current operation, and there is no
more specific error (such as NFS4ERR_ISDIR or NFS4ERR_SYMLINK)
that applies. Note that in NFSv4.0, such situations generally
resulted in the less-specific error NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_comp" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Compound Structure Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with errors that relate to the overall structure
of a Compound request (by which we mean to include both
COMPOUND and CB_COMPOUND), rather than to particular operations.
</t>
<t>
There are a number of basic constraints on the operations that
may appear in a Compound request. Sessions add to these basic
constraints by requiring a Sequence operation (either SEQUENCE
or CB_SEQUENCE) at the start of the Compound.
</t>
<section anchor="err_OK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS_OK (Error code 0)</name>
<t>
Indicates the operation completed successfully, in that all
of the constituent operations completed without error.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH (Error code 10021)</name>
<t>
The minor version specified is not one that the current listener
supports. This value is returned in the overall status for the
Compound but is not associated with a specific operation since
the results will specify a result count of zero.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOT_ONLY_OP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP (Error Code 10081)</name>
<t>
Certain operations, which are allowed to be executed outside
of a session, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the only operation within a Compound
whenever the Compound does not start with a Sequence
operation. This error results when that constraint is not met.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_OP_ILLEGAL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL (Error Code 10044)</name>
<t>
The operation code is not a valid one for the current
Compound procedure. The opcode
in the result stream matched with this error is the
ILLEGAL value, although the value that appears in the
request stream may be different. Where an illegal
value appears and the replier pre-parses all operations for
a Compound procedure before doing any operation execution,
an RPC-level XDR error may be returned.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION (Error Code 10071)</name>
<t>
Most forward operations and all callback operations are only
valid within the context of a session, so that the Compound
request in question <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> begin with a Sequence operation.
If an attempt is made to execute these operations outside
the context of session, this error results.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_REP_TOO_BIG" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG (Error Code 10066)</name>
<t>
The reply to a Compound would exceed the
channel's negotiated maximum response size.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE (Error Code 10067)</name>
<t>
The reply to a Compound would exceed the
channel's negotiated maximum size for replies cached in the
reply cache when the Sequence for the current request specifies
that this request is to be cached.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_REQ_TOO_BIG" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG (Error Code 10065)</name>
<t>
The Compound request exceeds the
channel's negotiated maximum size for requests.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP (Error Code 10068)</name>
<t>
The requester has attempted a retry of a Compound
that it previously requested not
be placed in the reply cache.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_SEQUENCE_POS" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS (Error Code 10064)</name>
<t>
A Sequence operation appeared in a
position other than the first operation of a
Compound request.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_TOO_MANY_OPS" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS (Error Code 10070)</name>
<t>
The Compound request has too many operations, exceeding the
count negotiated when the session was created.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_UNSAFE_COMPOUND" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_UNSAFE_COMPOUND (Error Code 10068)</name>
<t>
The client has sent a COMPOUND request with an unsafe
mix of operations -- specifically, with a non-idempotent
operation that changes the current filehandle and that is not followed by a
GETFH.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_fs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>File System Errors</name>
<t>
These errors describe situations that occurred in the underlying
file system implementation rather than in the protocol or any
NFSv4.x feature.
</t>
<section anchor="err_BADTYPE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADTYPE (Error Code 10007)</name>
<t>
An attempt was made to create an object with an inappropriate
type specified to CREATE. This may be because the type
is undefined, because the type is not supported by the
server, or because the type is not intended to be created by CREATE
(such as a regular file or named attribute, for
which OPEN is used to do the file creation).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_DQUOT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_DQUOT (Error Code 19)</name>
<t>
Resource (quota) hard limit exceeded. The user's resource
limit on the server has been exceeded.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_EXIST" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_EXIST (Error Code 17)</name>
<t>
A file of the specified target name (when creating, renaming,
or linking) already exists.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_FBIG" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_FBIG (Error Code 27)</name>
<t>
The file is too large. The operation would have caused the file to
grow beyond the server's limit.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_FILE_OPEN" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN (Error Code 10046)</name>
<t>
The operation is not allowed because a
file involved in the operation is currently open.
Servers may, but are not required to, disallow linking-to,
removing, or renaming open files.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_IO" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_IO (Error Code 5)</name>
<t>
Indicates that an I/O error occurred for which the file system
was unable to provide recovery.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_MLINK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_MLINK (Error Code 31)</name>
<t>
The request would have caused the server's limit for the
number of hard links a file may have to be exceeded.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOENT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOENT (Error Code 2)</name>
<t>
Indicates no such file or directory. The file or directory name
specified does not exist.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOSPC" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOSPC (Error Code 28)</name>
<t>
Indicates there is no space left on the device. The operation would have
caused the server's file system to exceed its limit.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOTEMPTY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOTEMPTY (Error Code 66)</name>
<t>
An attempt was made to remove a directory that was not
empty.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_ROFS" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_ROFS (Error Code 30)</name>
<t>
Indicates a read-only file system. A modifying operation was
attempted on a read-only file system.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_XDEV" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_XDEV (Error Code 18)</name>
<t>
Indicates an attempt to do an operation, such as linking, that
inappropriately crosses a boundary. This may be due to such
boundaries as:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
that between file systems (where the fsids are different).
</li>
<li>
that between different named attribute directories or
between a named attribute directory and an ordinary
directory.
</li>
<li>
that between byte-ranges of a file system that the file system
implementation treats as separate (for example, for space
accounting purposes), and where cross-connection between
the byte-ranges are not allowed.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_state_mgt" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>State Management Errors</name>
<t>
These errors indicate problems with the stateid (or one of
the stateids) passed to a given operation.
This includes
situations in which the stateid is invalid as well as
situations in which the stateid is valid but designates
locking state that has been revoked.
Depending on the operation, the
stateid when valid may designate opens, byte-range locks,
file or directory delegations, layouts, or device maps.
</t>
<section anchor="err_ADMIN_REVOKED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED (Error Code 10047)</name>
<t>
A stateid designates locking state of any type that has
been revoked due to administrative interaction, possibly
while the lease is valid.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_BAD_STATEID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID (Error Code 10026)</name>
<t>
A stateid does not properly designate any valid
state. See Sections <xref target="stateid_lifetime" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="special_stateid" format="counter"/>
for a discussion of how stateids are validated.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_DELEG_REVOKED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED (Error Code 10087)</name>
<t>
A stateid designates recallable locking state of
any type (delegation or layout) that has been
revoked due to the failure of the client to return
the lock when it was recalled.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_EXPIRED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_EXPIRED (Error Code 10011)</name>
<t>
A stateid designates locking state of any type that has
been revoked due to expiration of the client's lease,
either immediately upon lease expiration, or following
a later request for a conflicting lock.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_OLD_STATEID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID (Error Code 10024)</name>
<t>
A stateid with a non-zero seqid value does match
the current seqid for the state designated by the
user.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_sec" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Errors</name>
<t>
These are the various permission-related errors in NFSv4.1.
</t>
<section anchor="err_ACCESS" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_ACCESS (Error Code 13)</name>
<t>
Indicates permission denied. The caller does
not have the correct permission to perform
the requested operation. Contrast this with
NFS4ERR_PERM (<xref target="err_PERM" format="default"/>), which
restricts itself to owner or privileged-user
permission failures, and NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
(<xref target="err_WRONG_CRED" format="default"/>), which deals
with appropriate permission to delete or modify
transient objects based on the credentials of
the user that created them.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_PERM" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_PERM (Error Code 1)</name>
<t>
Indicates requester is not the owner. The operation was not
allowed because the caller is neither a privileged user
(root) nor the owner of the target of the operation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_WRONGSEC" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC (Error Code 10016)</name>
<t>
Indicates that the security mechanism being used by the client
for the operation does not match the server's security policy.
The client should change the security mechanism being used and
re-send the operation (but not with the same slot ID and
sequence ID; one or both <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be different on the re-send). SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME can be used
to determine the appropriate mechanism.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_WRONG_CRED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED (Error Code 10082)</name>
<t>
An operation that manipulates state was attempted by a principal
that was not allowed to modify that piece of state.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_name" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Name Errors</name>
<t>
Names in NFSv4 are UTF-8 strings. When the strings are not
valid UTF-8 or are of length zero, the error NFS4ERR_INVAL
results. Besides this, there are a number of other errors
to indicate specific problems with names.
</t>
<section anchor="err_BADCHAR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADCHAR (Error Code 10040)</name>
<t>
A UTF-8 string contains a character that is not supported
by the server in the context in which it being used.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_BADNAME" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADNAME (Error Code 10041)</name>
<t>
A name string in a request consisted of valid UTF-8
characters supported by the server, but the name is not
supported by the server as a valid name for the current operation.
An example might be creating a file or directory named ".."
on a server whose file system uses that name for links to
parent directories.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NAMETOOLONG" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG (Error Code 63)</name>
<t>
Returned when the filename in an operation exceeds the
server's implementation limit.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_locking" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Locking Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with errors related to locking, both as to
share reservations and byte-range locking. It does not deal
with errors specific to the process of reclaiming locks. Those
are dealt with in <xref target="errors_reclaim" format="default"/>.
</t>
<section anchor="err_BAD_RANGE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE (Error Code 10042)</name>
<t>
The byte-range of a LOCK, LOCKT, or LOCKU operation is
not allowed by the
server. For example, this error results when a server
that only supports 32-bit ranges receives a range that
cannot be handled by that server. (See
<xref target="OP_LOCK_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>.)
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_DEADLOCK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK (Error Code 10045)</name>
<t>
The server has been able to determine a byte-range locking
deadlock condition for a READW_LT or WRITEW_LT LOCK operation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_DENIED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_DENIED (Error Code 10010)</name>
<t>
An attempt to lock a file is denied. Since this may be a
temporary condition, the client is encouraged to re-send the lock
request (but not with the same slot ID and
sequence ID; one or both <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be different on the re-send) until the lock is accepted. See
<xref target="blocking_locks" format="default"/> for a discussion of the re-send.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_LOCKED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_LOCKED (Error Code 10012)</name>
<t>
A READ or WRITE operation was attempted on a file where there
was a conflict between the I/O and an existing lock:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
There is a share reservation inconsistent with the I/O
being done.
</li>
<li>
The range to be read or written intersects an existing
mandatory byte-range lock.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="err_LOCKS_HELD" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD (Error Code 10037)</name>
<t>
An operation was prevented by the unexpected presence of locks.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_LOCK_NOTSUPP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_LOCK_NOTSUPP (Error Code 10043)</name>
<t>
A LOCK operation was attempted that would require the upgrade
or downgrade of a byte-range lock range already held by the owner, and the
server does not support atomic upgrade or downgrade of locks.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_LOCK_RANGE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE (Error Code 10028)</name>
<t>
A LOCK operation is operating on a range that overlaps in part a
currently held byte-range lock for the current lock-owner and does not
precisely match a single such byte-range lock where the server
does not support this type of request, and thus does not
implement POSIX locking semantics <xref target="fcntl" format="default"/>. See Sections
<xref target="OP_LOCK_IMPLEMENTATION" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="OP_LOCKT_IMPLEMENTATION" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="OP_LOCKU_IMPLEMENTATION" format="counter"/> for a discussion of
how this applies to LOCK, LOCKT, and LOCKU respectively.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_OPENMODE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_OPENMODE (Error Code 10038)</name>
<t>
The client attempted a READ, WRITE, LOCK, or other operation
not sanctioned by the stateid passed (e.g., writing to a file
opened for read-only access).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_SHARE_DENIED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_SHARE_DENIED (Error Code 10015)</name>
<t>
An attempt to OPEN a file with a share reservation has failed
because of a share conflict.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_reclaim" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Reclaim Errors</name>
<t>
These errors relate to the process of reclaiming locks after a
server restart.
</t>
<section anchor="err_COMPLETE_ALREADY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_COMPLETE_ALREADY (Error Code 10054)</name>
<t>
The client previously sent a successful RECLAIM_COMPLETE
operation specifying the same scope, whether that scope is global
or for the same file system in the case of a per-fs RECLAIM_COMPLETE.
An additional RECLAIM_COMPLETE operation is not necessary and results in this error.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_GRACE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_GRACE (Error Code 10013)</name>
<t>
This error is returned when the server is in its
grace period with regard to the file system object for which
the lock was requested. In this situation, a non-reclaim
locking request cannot be granted. This can occur because either:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The server does not have sufficient information about locks that
might be potentially reclaimed to determine whether the lock could
be granted.
</li>
<li>
The request is made by a client responsible for reclaiming its
locks that has not yet done the appropriate RECLAIM_COMPLETE
operation, allowing it to proceed to obtain new locks.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In the case of a per-fs grace period,
there may be clients (i.e., those currently using the destination
file system) who might be unaware of the circumstances resulting
in the initiation of the grace period. Such clients need to
periodically retry the request until the grace period is over, just as
other clients do.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NO_GRACE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE (Error Code 10033)</name>
<t>
A reclaim of client state was attempted in circumstances in
which the server cannot guarantee that conflicting state has
not been provided to another client. This occurs in any of the
following situations:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
There
is no active grace period applying to the file system object
for which the request was made.
</li>
<li>
The client making the
request has no current role in reclaiming locks.
</li>
<li>
Previous operations have created a situation in which
the server is not able to determine that a reclaim-interfering
edge condition does not exist.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="err_RECLAIM_BAD" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD (Error Code 10034)</name>
<t>
The server has determined that a reclaim attempted by the client
is not valid, i.e., the lock specified as being reclaimed could
not possibly have existed before the server restart or file
system migration event. A server
is not obliged to make this determination and will typically rely
on the client to only reclaim locks that the client was granted prior
to restart. However,
when a server does have reliable information to enable it to make
this determination, this error indicates that the reclaim has
been rejected as invalid. This is as opposed to the error
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT (see <xref target="err_RECLAIM_CONFLICT" format="default"/>)
where the server can only determine that
there has been an invalid reclaim, but cannot determine
which request is invalid.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_RECLAIM_CONFLICT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT (Error Code 10035)</name>
<t>
The reclaim attempted by the client has encountered a conflict
and cannot be satisfied. This potentially indicates a misbehaving
client, although not necessarily the one receiving the error.
The misbehavior might be on the part of the client that
established the lock with which this client conflicted. See also
<xref target="err_RECLAIM_BAD" format="default"/> for the related error,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_pnfs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>pNFS Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with pNFS-related errors including those
that are associated with using NFSv4.1 to communicate with a
data server.
</t>
<section anchor="err_BADIOMODE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE (Error Code 10049)</name>
<t>
An invalid or inappropriate layout iomode was specified.
For example an inappropriate layout iomode, suppose
a client's LAYOUTGET operation specified an iomode of
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW, and the server is neither able nor willing
to let the client send write requests to data servers; the server
can reply with NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE. The client would then
send another LAYOUTGET with an iomode of LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_BADLAYOUT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT (Error Code 10050)</name>
<t>
The layout specified is invalid in some way. For LAYOUTCOMMIT,
this indicates that the specified layout is not held by the
client or is not of mode LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW. For LAYOUTGET,
it indicates that a layout matching the client's specification
as to minimum length cannot be granted.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_LAYOUTTRYLATER" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER (Error Code 10058)</name>
<t>
Layouts are temporarily unavailable for the file. The client
should re-send later (but not with the same slot ID and
sequence ID; one or both <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be different on the re-send).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_LAYOUTUNAVAILABLE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_LAYOUTUNAVAILABLE (Error Code 10059)</name>
<t>
Returned when layouts are not available for the current file
system or the particular specified file.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT (Error Code 10060)</name>
<t>
Returned when layouts are recalled and the client has no layouts
matching the specification of the layouts being recalled.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_PNFS_IO_HOLE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_PNFS_IO_HOLE (Error Code 10075)</name>
<t>
The pNFS client has attempted to read from or write to an
illegal hole of a file of a data server that is using
sparse packing. See <xref target="sparse_dense" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_PNFS_NO_LAYOUT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_PNFS_NO_LAYOUT (Error Code 10080)</name>
<t>
The pNFS client has attempted to read from or write to a file
(using a request to a data server) without holding a valid
layout. This includes the case where the client had a layout,
but the iomode does not allow a WRITE.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_RETURNCONFLICT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_RETURNCONFLICT (Error Code 10086)</name>
<t>
A layout
is unavailable due to an attempt to perform the LAYOUTGET
before a pending LAYOUTRETURN on the file has been received.
See <xref target="layout_server_consider" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE (Error Code 10062)</name>
<t>
The client has specified a layout type that is not supported by
the server.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_sess_use" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Session Use Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with errors encountered when using sessions,
that is, errors encountered when a request uses a Sequence
(i.e., either SEQUENCE or CB_SEQUENCE) operation.
</t>
<section anchor="err_BADSESSION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADSESSION (Error Code 10052)</name>
<t>
The specified session ID is unknown to the server
to which the operation is addressed.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_BADSLOT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADSLOT (Error Code 10053)</name>
<t>
The requester sent a Sequence operation
that attempted to use a slot the replier
does not have in its slot table. It is possible the
slot may have been retired.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_BAD_HIGH_SLOT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BAD_HIGH_SLOT (Error Code 10077)</name>
<t>
The highest_slot argument in a Sequence operation
exceeds the replier's enforced highest_slotid.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_CB_PATH_DOWN" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN (Error Code 10048)</name>
<t>
There is a problem contacting the client via
the callback path. The function of this error has
been mostly superseded by the use of
status flags in the reply to the SEQUENCE
operation (see <xref target="OP_SEQUENCE" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_DEADSESSION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION (Error Code 10078)</name>
<t>
The specified session is a persistent session that is
dead and does not accept new
requests or perform new operations on existing requests
(in the case in which a request was partially executed
before server restart).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION (Error Code 10055)</name>
<t>
A Sequence operation was sent on a connection that has not
been associated with the specified session,
where the client specified that connection association
was to be enforced with SP4_MACH_CRED or SP4_SSV state protection.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY (Error Code 10076)</name>
<t>
The requester sent a Sequence operation with a
slot ID and sequence ID that are in the reply cache, but
the replier has detected that the retried request
is not the same as the original request.
See <xref target="false_retry" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_SEQ_MISORDERED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED (Error Code 10063)</name>
<t>
The requester sent a Sequence operation
with an invalid sequence ID.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_sess_mgt" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Session Management Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with errors associated with requests used
in session management.
</t>
<section anchor="err_BACK_CHAN_BUSY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BACK_CHAN_BUSY (Error Code 10057)</name>
<t>
An attempt was made to destroy a session when the session
cannot be destroyed because the server has
callback requests outstanding.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_BAD_SESSION_DIGEST" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BAD_SESSION_DIGEST (Error Code 10051)</name>
<t>
The digest used in a SET_SSV request is not valid.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_client_mgt" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Client Management Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with errors associated with requests used
to create and manage client IDs.
</t>
<section anchor="err_CLIENTID_BUSY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY (Error Code 10074)</name>
<t>
The DESTROY_CLIENTID operation has found there are
sessions and/or unexpired state associated with the
client ID to be destroyed.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_CLID_INUSE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE (Error Code 10017)</name>
<t>
While processing an EXCHANGE_ID operation, the server was presented
with a co_ownerid field that matches an existing client with
valid leased state, but the principal sending the EXCHANGE_ID
operation differs from the principal that established the existing
client.
This indicates a collision (most likely due to chance) between
clients. The client should recover by changing the
co_ownerid and re-sending EXCHANGE_ID (but not with the same slot ID and
sequence ID; one or both <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be different on the re-send).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP (Error Code 10079)</name>
<t>
An EXCHANGE_ID was sent that specified state protection
via SSV, and where the set of encryption algorithms presented
by the client did not include any supported by the server.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_HASH_ALG_UNSUPP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_HASH_ALG_UNSUPP (Error Code 10072)</name>
<t>
An EXCHANGE_ID was sent that specified state protection
via SSV, and where the set of hashing algorithms presented
by the client did not include any supported by the server.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_STALE_CLIENTID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID (Error Code 10022)</name>
<t>
A client ID not recognized by the server was passed to an
operation. Note that unlike the case of NFSv4.0, client IDs
are not passed explicitly to the server in ordinary locking
operations and cannot result in this error. Instead, when
there is a server restart, it is first manifested through
an error on the associated session, and the staleness of the
client ID is detected when trying to associate a client ID
with a new session.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_deleg" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Delegation Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with errors associated with requesting and
returning delegations.
</t>
<section anchor="err_DELEG_ALREADY_WANTED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_DELEG_ALREADY_WANTED (Error Code 10056)</name>
<t>
The client has requested a delegation when it had already
registered that it wants that same delegation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_DIRDELEG_UNAVAIL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_DIRDELEG_UNAVAIL (Error Code 10084)</name>
<t>
This error is returned when the server is unable or unwilling
to provide a requested directory delegation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_RECALLCONFLICT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT (Error Code 10061)</name>
<t>
A recallable object (i.e., a layout or delegation)
is unavailable due to a conflicting recall operation that is
currently in progress for that object.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_REJECT_DELEG" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_REJECT_DELEG (Error Code 10085)</name>
<t>
The callback operation invoked to deal with a new delegation has
rejected it.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_attr" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Attribute Handling Errors</name>
<t>
This section deals with errors specific to attribute handling
within NFSv4.
</t>
<section anchor="err_ATTRNOTSUPP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP (Error Code 10032)</name>
<t>
An attribute specified is not supported by the server. This
error <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be returned by the GETATTR operation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_BADOWNER" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BADOWNER (Error Code 10039)</name>
<t>
This error is returned when an owner or owner_group attribute value or the who
field of an ACE within an ACL attribute value cannot be
translated to a local representation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NOT_SAME" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME (Error Code 10027)</name>
<t>
This error is returned by the VERIFY operation to signify
that the attributes compared were not the same as those provided
in the client's request.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_SAME" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_SAME (Error Code 10009)</name>
<t>
This error is returned by the NVERIFY operation to signify
that the attributes compared were the same as those provided
in the client's request.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="errors_obs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Obsoleted Errors</name>
<t>
These errors <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be generated by any NFSv4.1 operation.
This can be for a number of reasons.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The function provided by the error has been superseded
by one of the status bits returned by the SEQUENCE
operation.
</li>
<li>
The new session structure and associated change in
locking have made the error unnecessary.
</li>
<li>
There has been a restructuring of some errors for
NFSv4.1 that resulted in the elimination of certain errors.
</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="err_BAD_SEQID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_BAD_SEQID (Error Code 10026)</name>
<t>
The sequence number (seqid) in a locking request is neither the
next expected number or the last number processed. These
seqids are ignored in NFSv4.1.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_LEASE_MOVED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_LEASE_MOVED (Error Code 10031)</name>
<t>
A lease being renewed is associated with a file system
that has been migrated to a new server. The error has
been superseded by the SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED status bit
(see <xref target="OP_SEQUENCE" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_NXIO" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_NXIO (Error Code 5)</name>
<t>
I/O error. No such device or address. This error is
for errors involving block and character device access,
but because NFSv4.1 is not a device-access protocol, this
error is not applicable.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_RESTOREFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_RESTOREFH (Error Code 10030)</name>
<t>
The RESTOREFH operation does not have a saved filehandle
(identified by SAVEFH) to operate upon. In NFSv4.1, this error has
been superseded by NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="err_STALE_STATEID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID (Error Code 10023)</name>
<t>
A stateid generated by an earlier server instance was
used. This error is moot in NFSv4.1 because all operations that
take a stateid <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be preceded by the SEQUENCE operation,
and the earlier server instance is detected by the session
infrastructure that supports SEQUENCE.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] When adding new errors above, add them to the next section under -->
<!-- [auth] the appropriate operation; the next table for errors to -->
<!-- [auth] operations is automatically generated. -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operations and Their Valid Errors</name>
<t>
This section contains a table that gives the valid error returns
for each protocol operation. The error code NFS4_OK (indicating
no error) is not listed but should be understood to be returnable
by all operations with two important exceptions:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The operations that <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be implemented:
OPEN_CONFIRM, RELEASE_LOCKOWNER, RENEW, SETCLIENTID, and
SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM.
</li>
<li>
The invalid operation: ILLEGAL.
</li>
</ul>
<table anchor="op_error_returns" align="center">
<name>Valid Error Returns for Each Protocol Operation</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Operation</th>
<th align="left">Errors</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">ACCESS</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">BACKCHANNEL_CTL</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_SESSION_DIGEST,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CLOSE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">COMMIT</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CREATE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADNAME,
NFS4ERR_BADOWNER,
NFS4ERR_BADTYPE,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DQUOT,
NFS4ERR_EXIST,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MLINK,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_PERM,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNSAFE_COMPOUND
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CREATE_SESSION</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID,
NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">DELEGPURGE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">DELEGRETURN</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">DESTROY_CLIENTID</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">DESTROY_SESSION</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BACK_CHAN_BUSY,
NFS4ERR_BADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN,
NFS4ERR_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">EXCHANGE_ID</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP,
NFS4ERR_HASH_ALG_UNSUPP,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP,
NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FREE_STATEID</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GET_DIR_DELEGATION</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DIRDELEG_UNAVAIL,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GETATTR</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GETDEVICEINFO</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GETDEVICELIST</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_COOKIE,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GETFH</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_STALE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ILLEGAL</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LAYOUTCOMMIT</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE,
NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FBIG,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LAYOUTGET</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE,
NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_DQUOT,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER,
NFS4ERR_LAYOUTUNAVAILABLE,
NFS4ERR_LOCKED,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OPENMODE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LAYOUTRETURN</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LINK</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADNAME,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DQUOT,
NFS4ERR_EXIST,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MLINK,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE,
NFS4ERR_XDEV
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LOCK</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DENIED,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR,
NFS4ERR_LOCK_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OPENMODE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LOCKT</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DENIED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR,
NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LOCKU</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LOOKUP</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADNAME,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LOOKUPP</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NVERIFY</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SAME,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">OPEN</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADNAME,
NFS4ERR_BADOWNER,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_ALREADY_WANTED,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_DQUOT,
NFS4ERR_EXIST,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FBIG,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_PERM,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_SHARE_DENIED,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNSAFE_COMPOUND,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">OPEN_CONFIRM</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">OPEN_DOWNGRADE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">OPENATTR</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DQUOT,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNSAFE_COMPOUND,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PUTFH</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PUTPUBFH</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PUTROOTFH</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">READ</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_LOCKED,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OPENMODE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_PNFS_IO_HOLE,
NFS4ERR_PNFS_NO_LAYOUT,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">READDIR</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_COOKIE,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">READLINK</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RECLAIM_COMPLETE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_COMPLETE_ALREADY,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RELEASE_LOCKOWNER</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">REMOVE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADNAME,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_NOTEMPTY,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RENAME</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADNAME,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DQUOT,
NFS4ERR_EXIST,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MLINK,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_NOTEMPTY,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC,
NFS4ERR_XDEV
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RENEW</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RESTOREFH</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SAVEFH</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SECINFO</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADNAME,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SECINFO_NO_NAME</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOENT,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTDIR,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SEQUENCE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_BADSLOT,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_HIGH_SLOT,
NFS4ERR_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS,
NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY,
NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SET_SSV</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_SESSION_DIGEST,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SETATTR</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADOWNER,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_DQUOT,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FBIG,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_LOCKED,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OPENMODE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_PERM,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SETCLIENTID</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TEST_STATEID</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">VERIFY</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_BADCHAR,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">WANT_DELEGATION</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_ALREADY_WANTED,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD,
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">WRITE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_ACCESS,
NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED,
NFS4ERR_DQUOT,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_FBIG,
NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED,
NFS4ERR_GRACE,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_IO,
NFS4ERR_ISDIR,
NFS4ERR_LOCKED,
NFS4ERR_MOVED,
NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_NOSPC,
NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_OPENMODE,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_PNFS_IO_HOLE,
NFS4ERR_PNFS_NO_LAYOUT,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_ROFS,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_STALE,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<!-- [auth] When adding new errors above, add them to the next section under -->
<!-- [auth] the appropriate operation; the next table for errors to -->
<!-- [auth] operations is automatically generated. -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Callback Operations and Their Valid Errors</name>
<t>
This section contains a table that gives the valid error returns
for each callback operation. The error code NFS4_OK (indicating
no error) is not listed but should be understood to be returnable
by all callback operations with the exception of CB_ILLEGAL.
</t>
<table anchor="cb_op_error_returns" align="center">
<name>Valid Error Returns for Each Protocol Callback Operation</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Callback Operation</th>
<th align="left">Errors</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_GETATTR</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_ILLEGAL</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_LAYOUTRECALL</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_NOTIFY</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_NOTIFY_LOCK</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_PUSH_DELEG</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REJECT_DELEG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_RECALL</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_RECALL_ANY</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_INVAL,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_RECALL_SLOT</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_HIGH_SLOT,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_SEQUENCE</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADSESSION,
NFS4ERR_BADSLOT,
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_BAD_HIGH_SLOT,
NFS4ERR_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS,
NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY,
NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CB_WANTS_CANCELLED</td>
<td align="left">
NFS4ERR_BADXDR,
NFS4ERR_DELAY,
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE,
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG,
NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP,
NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT,
NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<!-- [auth] INCLUDE THE AUTO GENERATED ERROR TO OP TABLE -->
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Errors and the Operations That Use Them</name>
<table anchor="error_op_returns" align="center">
<name>Errors and the Operations That Use Them</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Error</th>
<th align="left">Operations</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ACCESS</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
GETATTR,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETATTR,
VERIFY,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED</td>
<td align="left">
CLOSE,
DELEGRETURN,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LOCK,
LOCKU,
OPEN,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
READ,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
SETATTR,
VERIFY
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BACK_CHAN_BUSY</td>
<td align="left">
DESTROY_SESSION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADCHAR</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
EXCHANGE_ID,
LINK,
LOOKUP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO,
SETATTR,
VERIFY
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE</td>
<td align="left">
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
PUTFH
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE</td>
<td align="left">
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADNAME</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
LINK,
LOOKUP,
OPEN,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADOWNER</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
OPEN,
SETATTR
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADSESSION</td>
<td align="left">
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_SEQUENCE,
DESTROY_SESSION,
SEQUENCE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADSLOT</td>
<td align="left">
CB_SEQUENCE,
SEQUENCE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADTYPE</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADXDR</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_ILLEGAL,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_SEQUENCE,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
ILLEGAL,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SEQUENCE,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_COOKIE</td>
<td align="left">
GETDEVICELIST,
READDIR
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_HIGH_SLOT</td>
<td align="left">
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_SEQUENCE,
SEQUENCE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE</td>
<td align="left">
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_SESSION_DIGEST</td>
<td align="left">
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
SET_SSV
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID</td>
<td align="left">
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_RECALL,
CLOSE,
DELEGRETURN,
FREE_STATEID,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LOCK,
LOCKU,
OPEN,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
READ,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN</td>
<td align="left">
DESTROY_SESSION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY</td>
<td align="left">
DESTROY_CLIENTID
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_COMPLETE_ALREADY</td>
<td align="left">
RECLAIM_COMPLETE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION</td>
<td align="left">
CB_SEQUENCE,
DESTROY_SESSION,
SEQUENCE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DEADLOCK</td>
<td align="left">
LOCK
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SEQUENCE,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DELAY</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_SEQUENCE,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SEQUENCE,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DELEG_ALREADY_WANTED</td>
<td align="left">
OPEN,
WANT_DELEGATION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED</td>
<td align="left">
DELEGRETURN,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
OPEN,
READ,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DENIED</td>
<td align="left">
LOCK,
LOCKT
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DIRDELEG_UNAVAIL</td>
<td align="left">
GET_DIR_DELEGATION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DQUOT</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
LAYOUTGET,
LINK,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
RENAME,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP</td>
<td align="left">
EXCHANGE_ID
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_EXIST</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
LINK,
OPEN,
RENAME
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_EXPIRED</td>
<td align="left">
CLOSE,
DELEGRETURN,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LOCK,
LOCKU,
OPEN,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
READ,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_FBIG</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
OPEN,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_FHEXPIRED</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
DELEGRETURN,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICELIST,
GETFH,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETATTR,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN</td>
<td align="left">
LINK,
REMOVE,
RENAME
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_GRACE</td>
<td align="left">
GETATTR,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
READ,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SETATTR,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_HASH_ALG_UNSUPP</td>
<td align="left">
EXCHANGE_ID
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_INVAL</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGRETURN,
EXCHANGE_ID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_IO</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LINK,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SETATTR,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ISDIR</td>
<td align="left">
COMMIT,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
OPEN,
READ,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTGET
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LAYOUTUNAVAILABLE</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTGET
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LOCKED</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTGET,
READ,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD</td>
<td align="left">
CLOSE,
FREE_STATEID
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LOCK_NOTSUPP</td>
<td align="left">
LOCK
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE</td>
<td align="left">
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_MLINK</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
LINK,
RENAME
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_MOVED</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
DELEGRETURN,
GETATTR,
GETFH,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETATTR,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NAMETOOLONG</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
LINK,
LOOKUP,
OPEN,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOENT</td>
<td align="left">
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
CREATE_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
GETDEVICEINFO,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
DELEGRETURN,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICELIST,
GETFH,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETATTR,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT</td>
<td align="left">
CB_LAYOUTRECALL
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOSPC</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
LAYOUTGET,
LINK,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
RENAME,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOTDIR</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LINK,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
OPEN,
READDIR,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOTEMPTY</td>
<td align="left">
REMOVE,
RENAME
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP</td>
<td align="left">
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_CONFIRM,
RELEASE_LOCKOWNER,
RENEW,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETCLIENTID,
SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM,
WANT_DELEGATION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP</td>
<td align="left">
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CREATE_SESSION,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME</td>
<td align="left">
EXCHANGE_ID,
GETDEVICELIST,
READDIR,
VERIFY
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LOCK,
OPEN,
WANT_DELEGATION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID</td>
<td align="left">
CLOSE,
DELEGRETURN,
FREE_STATEID,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LOCK,
LOCKU,
OPEN,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
READ,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_OPENMODE</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTGET,
LOCK,
READ,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL</td>
<td align="left">
CB_ILLEGAL,
ILLEGAL
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GETFH,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_PERM</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
OPEN,
SETATTR
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_PNFS_IO_HOLE</td>
<td align="left">
READ,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_PNFS_NO_LAYOUT</td>
<td align="left">
READ,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTGET,
WANT_DELEGATION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LOCK,
OPEN,
WANT_DELEGATION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_CONFLICT</td>
<td align="left">
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LOCK,
OPEN,
WANT_DELEGATION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REJECT_DELEG</td>
<td align="left">
CB_PUSH_DELEG
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_SEQUENCE,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SEQUENCE,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_SEQUENCE,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SEQUENCE,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_SEQUENCE,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SEQUENCE,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_SEQUENCE,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SEQUENCE,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_ROFS</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
SETATTR,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SAME</td>
<td align="left">
NVERIFY
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS</td>
<td align="left">
CB_SEQUENCE,
SEQUENCE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY</td>
<td align="left">
CB_SEQUENCE,
SEQUENCE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED</td>
<td align="left">
CB_SEQUENCE,
CREATE_SESSION,
SEQUENCE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETATTR,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SHARE_DENIED</td>
<td align="left">
OPEN
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_STALE</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
DELEGRETURN,
GETATTR,
GETFH,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SETATTR,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE_SESSION,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SYMLINK</td>
<td align="left">
COMMIT,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
OPEN,
READ,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE_SESSION,
GETDEVICEINFO,
LAYOUTGET,
READDIR
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS</td>
<td align="left">
ACCESS,
BACKCHANNEL_CTL,
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
CB_GETATTR,
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_NOTIFY,
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
CB_RECALL,
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL,
CB_RECALL_ANY,
CB_RECALL_SLOT,
CB_SEQUENCE,
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED,
CLOSE,
COMMIT,
CREATE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID,
FREE_STATEID,
GETATTR,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
GET_DIR_DELEGATION,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
READ,
READDIR,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
REMOVE,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH,
SAVEFH,
SECINFO,
SECINFO_NO_NAME,
SEQUENCE,
SETATTR,
SET_SSV,
TEST_STATEID,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE</td>
<td align="left">
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
GETDEVICEINFO,
GETDEVICELIST,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
NVERIFY,
SETATTR,
VERIFY
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_UNSAFE_COMPOUND</td>
<td align="left">
CREATE,
OPEN,
OPENATTR
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC</td>
<td align="left">
LINK,
LOOKUP,
LOOKUPP,
OPEN,
PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH,
RENAME,
RESTOREFH
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED</td>
<td align="left">
CLOSE,
CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE,
DELEGRETURN,
DESTROY_CLIENTID,
DESTROY_SESSION,
FREE_STATEID,
LAYOUTCOMMIT,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
LOCKU,
OPEN_DOWNGRADE,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE</td>
<td align="left">
CB_LAYOUTRECALL,
CB_PUSH_DELEG,
COMMIT,
GETATTR,
LAYOUTGET,
LAYOUTRETURN,
LINK,
LOCK,
LOCKT,
NVERIFY,
OPEN,
OPENATTR,
READ,
READLINK,
RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
SETATTR,
VERIFY,
WANT_DELEGATION,
WRITE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_XDEV</td>
<td align="left">
LINK,
RENAME
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="nfsv41procedures" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4.1 Procedures</name>
<t>
Both procedures, NULL and COMPOUND, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be implemented.
</t>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="PROC_NULL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Procedure 0: NULL - No Operation</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_NULL_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_NULL_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_NULL_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This is the standard NULL procedure with the standard void argument and
void response.
This procedure has no functionality associated with it. Because of
this, it is sometimes used to measure the overhead of processing a
service request. Therefore, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> ensure that no
unnecessary work is done in servicing this procedure.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_NULL_ERRORS" numbered="true">
<name>ERRORS</name>
<t>
None.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_COMPOUND" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Procedure 1: COMPOUND - Compound Operations</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_COMPOUND_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum nfs_opnum4 {
OP_ACCESS = 3,
OP_CLOSE = 4,
OP_COMMIT = 5,
OP_CREATE = 6,
OP_DELEGPURGE = 7,
OP_DELEGRETURN = 8,
OP_GETATTR = 9,
OP_GETFH = 10,
OP_LINK = 11,
OP_LOCK = 12,
OP_LOCKT = 13,
OP_LOCKU = 14,
OP_LOOKUP = 15,
OP_LOOKUPP = 16,
OP_NVERIFY = 17,
OP_OPEN = 18,
OP_OPENATTR = 19,
OP_OPEN_CONFIRM = 20, /* Mandatory not-to-implement */
OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE = 21,
OP_PUTFH = 22,
OP_PUTPUBFH = 23,
OP_PUTROOTFH = 24,
OP_READ = 25,
OP_READDIR = 26,
OP_READLINK = 27,
OP_REMOVE = 28,
OP_RENAME = 29,
OP_RENEW = 30, /* Mandatory not-to-implement */
OP_RESTOREFH = 31,
OP_SAVEFH = 32,
OP_SECINFO = 33,
OP_SETATTR = 34,
OP_SETCLIENTID = 35, /* Mandatory not-to-implement */
OP_SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM = 36, /* Mandatory not-to-implement */
OP_VERIFY = 37,
OP_WRITE = 38,
OP_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER = 39, /* Mandatory not-to-implement */
/* new operations for NFSv4.1 */
OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL = 40,
OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION = 41,
OP_EXCHANGE_ID = 42,
OP_CREATE_SESSION = 43,
OP_DESTROY_SESSION = 44,
OP_FREE_STATEID = 45,
OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION = 46,
OP_GETDEVICEINFO = 47,
OP_GETDEVICELIST = 48,
OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT = 49,
OP_LAYOUTGET = 50,
OP_LAYOUTRETURN = 51,
OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME = 52,
OP_SEQUENCE = 53,
OP_SET_SSV = 54,
OP_TEST_STATEID = 55,
OP_WANT_DELEGATION = 56,
OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID = 57,
OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE = 58,
OP_ILLEGAL = 10044
};
union nfs_argop4 switch (nfs_opnum4 argop) {
case OP_ACCESS: ACCESS4args opaccess;
case OP_CLOSE: CLOSE4args opclose;
case OP_COMMIT: COMMIT4args opcommit;
case OP_CREATE: CREATE4args opcreate;
case OP_DELEGPURGE: DELEGPURGE4args opdelegpurge;
case OP_DELEGRETURN: DELEGRETURN4args opdelegreturn;
case OP_GETATTR: GETATTR4args opgetattr;
case OP_GETFH: void;
case OP_LINK: LINK4args oplink;
case OP_LOCK: LOCK4args oplock;
case OP_LOCKT: LOCKT4args oplockt;
case OP_LOCKU: LOCKU4args oplocku;
case OP_LOOKUP: LOOKUP4args oplookup;
case OP_LOOKUPP: void;
case OP_NVERIFY: NVERIFY4args opnverify;
case OP_OPEN: OPEN4args opopen;
case OP_OPENATTR: OPENATTR4args opopenattr;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_OPEN_CONFIRM: OPEN_CONFIRM4args opopen_confirm;
case OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE:
OPEN_DOWNGRADE4args opopen_downgrade;
case OP_PUTFH: PUTFH4args opputfh;
case OP_PUTPUBFH: void;
case OP_PUTROOTFH: void;
case OP_READ: READ4args opread;
case OP_READDIR: READDIR4args opreaddir;
case OP_READLINK: void;
case OP_REMOVE: REMOVE4args opremove;
case OP_RENAME: RENAME4args oprename;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_RENEW: RENEW4args oprenew;
case OP_RESTOREFH: void;
case OP_SAVEFH: void;
case OP_SECINFO: SECINFO4args opsecinfo;
case OP_SETATTR: SETATTR4args opsetattr;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_SETCLIENTID: SETCLIENTID4args opsetclientid;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM: SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM4args
opsetclientid_confirm;
case OP_VERIFY: VERIFY4args opverify;
case OP_WRITE: WRITE4args opwrite;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER:
RELEASE_LOCKOWNER4args
oprelease_lockowner;
/* Operations new to NFSv4.1 */
case OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL:
BACKCHANNEL_CTL4args opbackchannel_ctl;
case OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION:
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION4args
opbind_conn_to_session;
case OP_EXCHANGE_ID: EXCHANGE_ID4args opexchange_id;
case OP_CREATE_SESSION:
CREATE_SESSION4args opcreate_session;
case OP_DESTROY_SESSION:
DESTROY_SESSION4args opdestroy_session;
case OP_FREE_STATEID: FREE_STATEID4args opfree_stateid;
case OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION:
GET_DIR_DELEGATION4args
opget_dir_delegation;
case OP_GETDEVICEINFO: GETDEVICEINFO4args opgetdeviceinfo;
case OP_GETDEVICELIST: GETDEVICELIST4args opgetdevicelist;
case OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT: LAYOUTCOMMIT4args oplayoutcommit;
case OP_LAYOUTGET: LAYOUTGET4args oplayoutget;
case OP_LAYOUTRETURN: LAYOUTRETURN4args oplayoutreturn;
case OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME:
SECINFO_NO_NAME4args opsecinfo_no_name;
case OP_SEQUENCE: SEQUENCE4args opsequence;
case OP_SET_SSV: SET_SSV4args opset_ssv;
case OP_TEST_STATEID: TEST_STATEID4args optest_stateid;
case OP_WANT_DELEGATION:
WANT_DELEGATION4args opwant_delegation;
case OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID:
DESTROY_CLIENTID4args
opdestroy_clientid;
case OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE:
RECLAIM_COMPLETE4args
opreclaim_complete;
/* Operations not new to NFSv4.1 */
case OP_ILLEGAL: void;
};
struct COMPOUND4args {
utf8str_cs tag;
uint32_t minorversion;
nfs_argop4 argarray<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_COMPOUND_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union nfs_resop4 switch (nfs_opnum4 resop) {
case OP_ACCESS: ACCESS4res opaccess;
case OP_CLOSE: CLOSE4res opclose;
case OP_COMMIT: COMMIT4res opcommit;
case OP_CREATE: CREATE4res opcreate;
case OP_DELEGPURGE: DELEGPURGE4res opdelegpurge;
case OP_DELEGRETURN: DELEGRETURN4res opdelegreturn;
case OP_GETATTR: GETATTR4res opgetattr;
case OP_GETFH: GETFH4res opgetfh;
case OP_LINK: LINK4res oplink;
case OP_LOCK: LOCK4res oplock;
case OP_LOCKT: LOCKT4res oplockt;
case OP_LOCKU: LOCKU4res oplocku;
case OP_LOOKUP: LOOKUP4res oplookup;
case OP_LOOKUPP: LOOKUPP4res oplookupp;
case OP_NVERIFY: NVERIFY4res opnverify;
case OP_OPEN: OPEN4res opopen;
case OP_OPENATTR: OPENATTR4res opopenattr;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_OPEN_CONFIRM: OPEN_CONFIRM4res opopen_confirm;
case OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE:
OPEN_DOWNGRADE4res
opopen_downgrade;
case OP_PUTFH: PUTFH4res opputfh;
case OP_PUTPUBFH: PUTPUBFH4res opputpubfh;
case OP_PUTROOTFH: PUTROOTFH4res opputrootfh;
case OP_READ: READ4res opread;
case OP_READDIR: READDIR4res opreaddir;
case OP_READLINK: READLINK4res opreadlink;
case OP_REMOVE: REMOVE4res opremove;
case OP_RENAME: RENAME4res oprename;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_RENEW: RENEW4res oprenew;
case OP_RESTOREFH: RESTOREFH4res oprestorefh;
case OP_SAVEFH: SAVEFH4res opsavefh;
case OP_SECINFO: SECINFO4res opsecinfo;
case OP_SETATTR: SETATTR4res opsetattr;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_SETCLIENTID: SETCLIENTID4res opsetclientid;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM:
SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM4res
opsetclientid_confirm;
case OP_VERIFY: VERIFY4res opverify;
case OP_WRITE: WRITE4res opwrite;
/* Not for NFSv4.1 */
case OP_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER:
RELEASE_LOCKOWNER4res
oprelease_lockowner;
/* Operations new to NFSv4.1 */
case OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL:
BACKCHANNEL_CTL4res
opbackchannel_ctl;
case OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION:
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION4res
opbind_conn_to_session;
case OP_EXCHANGE_ID: EXCHANGE_ID4res opexchange_id;
case OP_CREATE_SESSION:
CREATE_SESSION4res
opcreate_session;
case OP_DESTROY_SESSION:
DESTROY_SESSION4res
opdestroy_session;
case OP_FREE_STATEID: FREE_STATEID4res
opfree_stateid;
case OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION:
GET_DIR_DELEGATION4res
opget_dir_delegation;
case OP_GETDEVICEINFO: GETDEVICEINFO4res
opgetdeviceinfo;
case OP_GETDEVICELIST: GETDEVICELIST4res
opgetdevicelist;
case OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT: LAYOUTCOMMIT4res oplayoutcommit;
case OP_LAYOUTGET: LAYOUTGET4res oplayoutget;
case OP_LAYOUTRETURN: LAYOUTRETURN4res oplayoutreturn;
case OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME:
SECINFO_NO_NAME4res
opsecinfo_no_name;
case OP_SEQUENCE: SEQUENCE4res opsequence;
case OP_SET_SSV: SET_SSV4res opset_ssv;
case OP_TEST_STATEID: TEST_STATEID4res optest_stateid;
case OP_WANT_DELEGATION:
WANT_DELEGATION4res
opwant_delegation;
case OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID:
DESTROY_CLIENTID4res
opdestroy_clientid;
case OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE:
RECLAIM_COMPLETE4res
opreclaim_complete;
/* Operations not new to NFSv4.1 */
case OP_ILLEGAL: ILLEGAL4res opillegal;
};
struct COMPOUND4res {
nfsstat4 status;
utf8str_cs tag;
nfs_resop4 resarray<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_COMPOUND_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The COMPOUND procedure is used to combine one or more NFSv4
operations into a
single RPC request. The server interprets each of the operations in
turn. If an operation is executed by the server and the status of that
operation is NFS4_OK, then the next operation in the COMPOUND
procedure is executed. The server continues this process until there
are no more operations to be executed or until one of the operations has a
status value other than NFS4_OK.
</t>
<t>
In the processing of the COMPOUND procedure, the server may find that
it does not have the available resources to execute any or all of the
operations within the COMPOUND sequence. See
<xref target="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" format="default"/> for a more detailed discussion.
</t>
<t>
The server will generally choose between two methods of decoding the
client's request. The first would be the traditional one-pass XDR
decode. If there is an XDR decoding error in this case, the RPC XDR
decode error would be returned. The second method would be to make an
initial pass to decode the basic COMPOUND request and then to XDR
decode the individual operations; the most interesting is the decode
of attributes. In this case, the server may encounter an XDR decode
error during the second pass. If it does, the server would return
the error NFS4ERR_BADXDR to signify the decode error.
</t>
<t>
The COMPOUND arguments contain a "minorversion" field. For NFSv4.1,
the value for this field is 1. If the server receives
a COMPOUND procedure with a minorversion field value that it does not
support, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return an error of
NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH and a zero-length resultdata array.
</t>
<t>
Contained within the COMPOUND results is a "status" field. If the
results array length is non-zero, this status must be equivalent to
the status of the last operation that was executed within the COMPOUND
procedure. Therefore, if an operation incurred an error then the
"status" value will be the same error value as is being returned for
the operation that failed.
</t>
<t>
Note that operations zero and one are not defined for the
COMPOUND procedure. Operation 2 is not defined and is reserved for
future definition and use with minor versioning. If the server
receives an operation array that contains operation 2 and the
minorversion field has a value of zero, an error of
NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL, as described in the next paragraph, is returned to
the client. If an operation array contains an operation 2 and the
minorversion field is non-zero and the server does not support the
minor version, the server returns an error of
NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH. Therefore, the
NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH error takes precedence over all other
errors.
</t>
<t>
It is possible that the server receives a request that contains an
operation that is less than the first legal operation (OP_ACCESS) or
greater than the last legal operation (OP_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER). In this
case, the server's response will encode the opcode OP_ILLEGAL rather
than the illegal opcode of the request. The status field in the
ILLEGAL return results will be set to NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL. The COMPOUND
procedure's return results will also be NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL.
</t>
<t>
The definition of the "tag" in the request is left to the implementor.
It may be used to summarize the content of the Compound request for
the benefit of packet-sniffers and engineers debugging
implementations. However, the value of "tag" in the response <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
be the same value as provided in the request. This applies to the tag
field of the CB_COMPOUND procedure as well.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="current_filehandle_stateid" numbered="true">
<name>Current Filehandle and Stateid</name>
<t>
The COMPOUND procedure offers a simple environment for the
execution of the operations specified by the client. The first
two relate to the filehandle while the second two relate to the
current stateid.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="current_filehandle" numbered="true">
<name>Current Filehandle</name>
<t>
The current and saved filehandles are used throughout
the protocol. Most operations implicitly use
the current filehandle as an argument, and many set
the current filehandle as part of the results.
The combination of client-specified sequences
of operations and current and saved filehandle
arguments and results allows for greater protocol
flexibility. The best or easiest example of current
filehandle usage is a sequence like the following:
</t>
<figure anchor="curfh_example">
<sourcecode type="nfsv4compound"><![CDATA[
PUTFH fh1 {fh1}
LOOKUP "compA" {fh2}
GETATTR {fh2}
LOOKUP "compB" {fh3}
GETATTR {fh3}
LOOKUP "compC" {fh4}
GETATTR {fh4}
GETFH]]></sourcecode>
</figure>
<t>
In this example, the PUTFH (<xref target="OP_PUTFH" format="default"/>) operation explicitly sets the current
filehandle value while the result of each LOOKUP operation sets
the current filehandle value to the resultant file system
object. Also, the client is able to insert GETATTR operations
using the current filehandle as an argument.
</t>
<t>
The PUTROOTFH (<xref target="OP_PUTROOTFH" format="default"/>) and
PUTPUBFH (<xref target="OP_PUTPUBFH" format="default"/>) operations also set the
current filehandle. The above example would replace "PUTFH fh1" with
PUTROOTFH or PUTPUBFH with no filehandle argument in order to
achieve the same effect (on the assumption that "compA" is directly
below the root of the namespace).
</t>
<t>
Along with the current filehandle, there is a saved filehandle.
While the current filehandle is set as the result of
operations like LOOKUP, the saved filehandle must be set
directly with the use of the SAVEFH operation. The SAVEFH
operation copies the current filehandle value to the saved
value. The saved filehandle value is used in combination with
the current filehandle value for the LINK and RENAME
operations. The RESTOREFH operation will copy the saved filehandle value to the current filehandle value; as a result, the
saved filehandle value may be used a sort of "scratch" area for
the client's series of operations.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="current_stateid" numbered="true">
<name>Current Stateid</name>
<t>
With NFSv4.1, additions of a current stateid and a saved stateid
have been made to the COMPOUND processing environment; this
allows for the passing of stateids between operations. There
are no changes to the syntax of the protocol, only changes to
the semantics of a few operations.
</t>
<t>
A "current stateid" is the stateid that is associated
with the current filehandle. The current stateid
may only be changed by an operation that modifies
the current filehandle or returns a stateid. If an
operation returns a stateid, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the current
stateid to the returned value. If an operation sets
the current filehandle but does not return a stateid,
the current stateid <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to the all-zeros
special stateid, i.e., (seqid, other) = (0, 0).
If an operation uses a stateid as an argument but does
not return a stateid, the current stateid <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be
changed.
For example, PUTFH, PUTROOTFH, and PUTPUBFH
will change the current server state from {ocfh,
(osid)} to {cfh, (0, 0)}, while LOCK will change the current
state from {cfh, (osid} to {cfh, (nsid)}. Operations like
LOOKUP that transform a current filehandle and
component name into a new current filehandle will also
change the current state to {0, 0}. The SAVEFH
and RESTOREFH operations will save and restore both
the current filehandle and the current stateid as a set.
</t>
<t>
The following example is the common case of a simple READ
operation with a normal stateid showing that the PUTFH
initializes the current stateid to (0, 0). The subsequent READ
with stateid (sid1) leaves the current stateid unchanged.
</t>
<figure anchor="csid_example1">
<sourcecode type="nfsv4compound"><![CDATA[
PUTFH fh1 - -> {fh1, (0, 0)}
READ (sid1), 0, 1024 {fh1, (0, 0)} -> {fh1, (0, 0)}]]></sourcecode>
</figure>
<t>
This next example performs an OPEN with the root
filehandle and, as a result, generates stateid (sid1). The next
operation specifies the READ with the argument stateid set such
that (seqid, other) are equal to (1, 0),
but the current stateid set by the previous operation is
actually used when the operation is evaluated. This allows correct
interaction with any existing, potentially conflicting,
locks.
</t>
<figure anchor="csid_example2">
<sourcecode type="nfsv4compound"><![CDATA[
PUTROOTFH - -> {fh1, (0, 0)}
OPEN "compA" {fh1, (0, 0)} -> {fh2, (sid1)}
READ (1, 0), 0, 1024 {fh2, (sid1)} -> {fh2, (sid1)}
CLOSE (1, 0) {fh2, (sid1)} -> {fh2, (sid2)}]]></sourcecode>
</figure>
<t>
This next example is similar to the second in how
it passes the stateid sid2 generated by the LOCK
operation to the next READ operation. This allows
the client to explicitly surround a single I/O
operation with a lock and its appropriate stateid to
guarantee correctness with other client locks. The
example also shows how SAVEFH and RESTOREFH can
save and later reuse a filehandle and stateid, passing them as the
current filehandle and stateid to a READ operation.
</t>
<figure anchor="csid_example3">
<sourcecode type="nfsv4compound"><![CDATA[
PUTFH fh1 - -> {fh1, (0, 0)}
LOCK 0, 1024, (sid1) {fh1, (sid1)} -> {fh1, (sid2)}
READ (1, 0), 0, 1024 {fh1, (sid2)} -> {fh1, (sid2)}
LOCKU 0, 1024, (1, 0) {fh1, (sid2)} -> {fh1, (sid3)}
SAVEFH {fh1, (sid3)} -> {fh1, (sid3)}
PUTFH fh2 {fh1, (sid3)} -> {fh2, (0, 0)}
WRITE (1, 0), 0, 1024 {fh2, (0, 0)} -> {fh2, (0, 0)}
RESTOREFH {fh2, (0, 0)} -> {fh1, (sid3)}
READ (1, 0), 1024, 1024 {fh1, (sid3)} -> {fh1, (sid3)}]]></sourcecode>
</figure>
<t>
The final example shows a disallowed use of
the current stateid. The client is attempting
to implicitly pass an anonymous special stateid, (0,0), to
the READ operation. The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID
in the reply to the READ operation.
</t>
<figure anchor="csid_example4">
<sourcecode type="nfsv4compound"><![CDATA[
PUTFH fh1 - -> {fh1, (0, 0)}
READ (1, 0), 0, 1024 {fh1, (0, 0)} -> NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID]]></sourcecode>
</figure>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_COMPOUND_ERRORS" numbered="true">
<name>ERRORS</name>
<t>
COMPOUND will of course return every error that each operation on
the fore channel can return (see <xref target="op_error_returns" format="default"/>).
However, if COMPOUND returns zero operations, obviously the error
returned by COMPOUND has nothing to do with an error returned by
an operation. The list of errors COMPOUND will return if it processes
zero operations include:
</t>
<table anchor="compounderrs" align="center">
<name>COMPOUND Error Returns</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Error</th>
<th align="left">Notes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADCHAR</td>
<td align="left">The tag argument has a character the replier
does not support. </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADXDR</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DELAY</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_INVAL</td>
<td align="left">The tag argument is not in UTF-8 encoding.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="operation_mandlist" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operations: <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>, <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, or <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14></name>
<t>
The following tables summarize the operations of the NFSv4.1
protocol and the corresponding designation of <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>,
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, and <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> to implement or <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> implement. The
designation of <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> implement is reserved for those operations
that were defined in NFSv4.0 and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be implemented in NFSv4.1.
</t>
<t>
For the most part, the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>, <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>, or <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> designation for
operations sent by the client is for
the server implementation. The client is generally required to
implement the operations needed for the operating environment for
which it serves. For example, a read-only NFSv4.1 client would
have no need to implement the WRITE operation and is not required
to do so.
</t>
<t>
The <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> or <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> designation for
callback operations sent by the server is for both the client
and server. Generally, the client has the option of
creating the backchannel and sending the operations on the
fore channel that will be a catalyst for the server sending
callback operations. A partial
exception is CB_RECALL_SLOT; the only way the client can
avoid supporting this operation is by not creating a backchannel.
</t>
<t>
Since this is a summary of the operations and their designation,
there are subtleties that are not presented here. Therefore, if
there is a question of the requirements of implementation, the
operation descriptions themselves must be consulted along with
other relevant explanatory text within this specification.
</t>
<t>
The abbreviations used in the second and third columns of the table
are defined as follows.
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>REQ</dt>
<dd>
<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> to implement
</dd>
<dt>REC</dt>
<dd>
RECOMMEND to implement
</dd>
<dt>OPT</dt>
<dd>
<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> to implement
</dd>
<dt>MNI</dt>
<dd>
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> implement
</dd>
</dl>
<t> For the NFSv4.1 features that are <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>, the operations that
support those features are <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>, and the server would return
NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP in response to the client's use of those
operations. If an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> feature is supported, it is possible
that a set of operations related to the feature become <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>
to implement. The third column of the table designates the
feature(s) and if the operation is <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> or <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> in the
presence of support for the feature.
</t>
<t>
The <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> features identified and their abbreviations are as
follows:
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>pNFS</dt>
<dd>
Parallel NFS
</dd>
<dt>FDELG</dt>
<dd>
File Delegations
</dd>
<dt>DDELG</dt>
<dd>
Directory Delegations
</dd>
</dl>
<table align="center">
<name>Operations</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Operation</th>
<th align="left">REQ, REC, OPT, or MNI</th>
<th align="left">Feature (REQ, REC, or OPT)</th>
<th align="left">Definition</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"> ACCESS </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_ACCESS" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> BACKCHANNEL_CTL </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION</td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CLOSE </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CLOSE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> COMMIT </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_COMMIT" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CREATE </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CREATE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CREATE_SESSION </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> DELEGPURGE </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_DELEGPURGE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> DELEGRETURN </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG, DDELG, pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_DELEGRETURN" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> DESTROY_CLIENTID </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> DESTROY_SESSION </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_DESTROY_SESSION" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> EXCHANGE_ID </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> FREE_STATEID </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_FREE_STATEID" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> GETATTR </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_GETATTR" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> GETDEVICEINFO </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_GETDEVICEINFO" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> GETDEVICELIST</td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">pNFS (OPT)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_GETDEVICELIST" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> GETFH </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_GETFH" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> GET_DIR_DELEGATION </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">DDELG (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LAYOUTCOMMIT </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LAYOUTGET </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LAYOUTGET" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LAYOUTRETURN </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LAYOUTRETURN" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LINK </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LINK" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LOCK </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LOCK" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LOCKT </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LOCKT" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LOCKU </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LOCKU" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LOOKUP </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LOOKUP" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> LOOKUPP </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_LOOKUPP" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> NVERIFY </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_NVERIFY" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> OPEN </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> OPENATTR </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_OPENATTR" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> OPEN_CONFIRM </td>
<td align="left">MNI</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"> N/A </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> OPEN_DOWNGRADE </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> PUTFH </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_PUTFH" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> PUTPUBFH </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_PUTPUBFH" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> PUTROOTFH </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_PUTROOTFH" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> READ </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_READ" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> READDIR </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_READDIR" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> READLINK </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_READLINK" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> RECLAIM_COMPLETE </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> RELEASE_LOCKOWNER</td>
<td align="left">MNI</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"> N/A </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> REMOVE </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_REMOVE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> RENAME </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_RENAME" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> RENEW </td>
<td align="left">MNI</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"> N/A </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> RESTOREFH </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_RESTOREFH" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> SAVEFH </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_SAVEFH" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> SECINFO </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_SECINFO" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> SECINFO_NO_NAME </td>
<td align="left">REC</td>
<td align="left">pNFS file layout (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME" format="default"/>,
<xref target="file_security_considerations" format="default"/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> SEQUENCE </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_SEQUENCE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> SETATTR </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_SETATTR" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> SETCLIENTID</td>
<td align="left">MNI</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"> N/A </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM</td>
<td align="left">MNI</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"> N/A </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> SET_SSV</td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_SET_SSV" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> TEST_STATEID </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_TEST_STATEID" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> VERIFY </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_VERIFY" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> WANT_DELEGATION</td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG (OPT)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_WANT_DELEGATION" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> WRITE </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_WRITE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table align="center">
<name>Callback Operations</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Operation</th>
<th align="left">REQ, REC, OPT, or MNI</th>
<th align="left">Feature (REQ, REC, or OPT)</th>
<th align="left">Definition</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_GETATTR </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_GETATTR" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_LAYOUTRECALL </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_NOTIFY </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">DDELG (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">pNFS (OPT)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_NOTIFY_LOCK </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_PUSH_DELEG </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG (OPT)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_RECALL </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG, DDELG, pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_RECALL" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_RECALL_ANY </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG, DDELG, pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_RECALL_SLOT </td>
<td align="left">REQ</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">DDELG, pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_SEQUENCE </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG, DDELG, pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_SEQUENCE" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"> CB_WANTS_CANCELLED </td>
<td align="left">OPT</td>
<td align="left">FDELG, DDELG, pNFS (REQ)</td>
<td align="left">
<xref target="OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED" format="default"/> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="nfsv41operations" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4.1 Operations</name>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_ACCESS" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 3: ACCESS - Check Access Rights</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_ACCESS_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const ACCESS4_READ = 0x00000001;
const ACCESS4_LOOKUP = 0x00000002;
const ACCESS4_MODIFY = 0x00000004;
const ACCESS4_EXTEND = 0x00000008;
const ACCESS4_DELETE = 0x00000010;
const ACCESS4_EXECUTE = 0x00000020;
struct ACCESS4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: object */
uint32_t access;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_ACCESS_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct ACCESS4resok {
uint32_t supported;
uint32_t access;
};
union ACCESS4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
ACCESS4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_ACCESS_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
ACCESS determines the access rights that a user, as identified by the
credentials in the RPC request, has with respect to the file system
object specified by the current filehandle. The client encodes the
set of access rights that are to be checked in the bit mask "access".
The server checks the permissions encoded in the bit mask. If a
status of NFS4_OK is returned, two bit masks are included in the
response. The first, "supported", represents the access rights for
which the server can verify reliably. The second, "access",
represents the access rights available to the user for the filehandle
provided. On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
<t>
Note that the reply's supported and access fields <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
contain more values than originally set in the request's
access field. For example, if the client sends an ACCESS
operation with just the ACCESS4_READ value set and the
server supports this value, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> set more
than ACCESS4_READ in the supported field even if it could
have reliably checked other values.
</t>
<t>
The reply's access field <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> contain more values than the
supported field.
</t>
<t>
The results of this operation are necessarily advisory in nature. A
return status of NFS4_OK and the appropriate bit set in the bit mask
do not imply that such access will be allowed to the file system
object in the future. This is because access rights can be revoked by
the server at any time.
</t>
<t>
The following access permissions may be requested:
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>ACCESS4_READ</dt>
<dd>
Read data from file or read a directory.
</dd>
<dt>ACCESS4_LOOKUP</dt>
<dd>
Look up a name in a directory (no meaning for non-directory objects).
</dd>
<dt>ACCESS4_MODIFY</dt>
<dd>
Rewrite existing file data or modify existing directory entries.
</dd>
<dt>ACCESS4_EXTEND</dt>
<dd>
Write new data or add directory entries.
</dd>
<dt>ACCESS4_DELETE</dt>
<dd>
Delete an existing directory entry.
</dd>
<dt>ACCESS4_EXECUTE</dt>
<dd>
Execute a regular file (no meaning for a directory).
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
<t>
ACCESS4_EXECUTE is a challenging semantic to implement because
NFS provides remote file access, not remote
execution. This leads to the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Whether or not a regular file is executable ought to be
the responsibility of the NFS client and not the server. And yet
the ACCESS operation is specified to seemingly require a server to
own that responsibility.
</li>
<li>
When a client executes a regular file, it has to
read the file from the server. Strictly speaking,
the server should not allow the client to read a file
being executed unless the user has read permissions
on the file. Requiring
explicit read permissions on executable files in order to
access them over NFS is not going to be acceptable to
some users and storage administrators. Historically, NFS servers have allowed
a user to READ a file if the user has execute access
to the file.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
As a practical example, the UNIX specification <xref target="access_api" format="default"/> states that an implementation
claiming conformance to UNIX may indicate in the
access() programming interface's result that a
privileged user has execute rights, even if no
execute permission bits are set on the regular file's
attributes. It is possible to claim conformance
to the UNIX specification and instead not indicate
execute rights in that situation, which is true for
some operating environments. Suppose the operating
environments of the client and server are implementing
the access() semantics for privileged users differently,
and the ACCESS operation implementations of the client
and server follow their respective access() semantics.
This can cause undesired behavior:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Suppose the client's access() interface returns X_OK
if the user is privileged and no execute permission
bits are set on the regular file's attribute, and the
server's access() interface does not return X_OK in
that situation. Then the client will be unable to
execute files stored on the NFS server that could be
executed if stored on a non-NFS file system.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Suppose the client's access() interface does
not return X_OK if the user is privileged, and no
execute permission bits are set on the regular file's
attribute, and the server's access() interface does
return X_OK in that situation. Then:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The client will be able to execute files stored on
the NFS server that could be executed if stored on
a non-NFS file system, unless the client's execution
subsystem also checks for execute permission bits.
</li>
<li>
Even if the execution subsystem is checking for
execute permission bits, there are more potential
issues. For example, suppose the client is invoking access()
to build a "path search table" of all executable
files in the user's "search path", where the path
is a list of directories each containing executable
files. Suppose there are two files each in separate
directories of the search path, such that files have
the same component name. In the first directory
the file has no execute permission bits set,
and in the second directory the file has execute
bits set. The path search table will indicate that
the first directory has the executable file, but
the execute subsystem will fail to execute it. The
command shell might fail to try the second file in
the second directory. And even if it did, this is
a potential performance issue. Clearly, the desired
outcome for the client is for the path search table
to not contain the first file.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
To deal with the problems described above, the "smart client,
stupid server" principle is used. The client owns overall
responsibility for determining execute access and
relies on the server to parse the execution permissions
within the file's mode, acl, and dacl attributes. The
rules for the client and server follow:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the client is sending ACCESS in order to determine
if the user can read the file, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
set ACCESS4_READ in the request's access field.
</li>
<li>
If the client's operating environment only grants
execution to the user if the user has execute access
according to the execute permissions in the mode,
acl, and dacl attributes, then if the client wants
to determine execute access, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send
an ACCESS request with ACCESS4_EXECUTE bit set in the
request's access field.
</li>
<li>
If the client's operating environment grants execution
to the user even if the user does not have execute
access according to the execute permissions in the
mode, acl, and dacl attributes, then if the client
wants to determine execute access, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send
an ACCESS request with both the ACCESS4_EXECUTE and
ACCESS4_READ bits set in the request's access field. This
way, if any read or execute permission grants the user
read or execute access (or if the server interprets
the user as privileged), as indicated by the presence
of ACCESS4_EXECUTE and/or ACCESS4_READ in the reply's
access field, the client will be able to grant the
user execute access to the file.
</li>
<li>
If the server supports execute permission bits, or some other
method for denoting executability (e.g., the suffix of the name
of the file might indicate execute), it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> check
only execute permissions, not read permissions, when determining
whether or not the reply will have ACCESS4_EXECUTE set in the access
field.
The server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> also examine read permission bits when
determining whether or not the reply will have ACCESS4_EXECUTE
set in the access field. Even if the server's
operating environment would grant execute access to the
user (e.g., the user is privileged), the server <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> reply with ACCESS4_EXECUTE set in reply's access
field unless there is at least one execute permission
bit set in the mode, acl, or dacl attributes. In the
case of acl and dacl, the "one execute permission bit"
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be an ACE4_EXECUTE bit set in an ALLOW ACE.
</li>
<li>
If the server does not support execute permission
bits or some other method for denoting executability, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> set ACCESS4_EXECUTE in the
reply's supported and access fields. If the client
set ACCESS4_EXECUTE in the ACCESS request's access
field, and ACCESS4_EXECUTE is not set in the reply's
supported field, then the client will have to send
an ACCESS request with the ACCESS4_READ bit set in
the request's access field.
</li>
<li>
If the server supports read permission bits, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
only check for read permissions in the mode, acl,
and dacl attributes when it receives an ACCESS request
with ACCESS4_READ set in the access field. The server
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> also examine execute permission bits when
determining whether the reply will have ACCESS4_READ
set in the access field or not.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that if the ACCESS reply has ACCESS4_READ
or ACCESS_EXECUTE set, then the user also has
permissions to OPEN (<xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/>) or
READ (<xref target="OP_READ" format="default"/>) the file. In other words, if
the client sends an ACCESS request with the ACCESS4_READ
and ACCESS_EXECUTE set in the access field (or two
separate requests, one with ACCESS4_READ set and the
other with ACCESS4_EXECUTE set), and the reply has
just ACCESS4_EXECUTE set in the access field (or just
one reply has ACCESS4_EXECUTE set), then the user has
authorization to OPEN or READ the file.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_ACCESS_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
In general, it is not sufficient for the client to attempt to deduce
access permissions by inspecting the uid, gid, and mode fields in the
file attributes or by attempting to interpret the contents of the ACL
attribute. This is because the server may perform uid or gid mapping
or enforce additional access-control restrictions. It is also
possible that the server may not be in the same ID space as the
client. In these cases (and perhaps others), the client cannot
reliably perform an access check with only current file attributes.
</t>
<t>
In the NFSv2 protocol, the only reliable way to determine
whether an operation was allowed was to try it and see if it succeeded
or failed. Using the ACCESS operation in the NFSv4.1 protocol,
the client can ask the server to indicate whether or not one or more
classes of operations are permitted. The ACCESS operation is provided
to allow clients to check before doing a series of operations that
will result in an access failure. The OPEN operation provides a point
where the server can verify access to the file object and a method to
return that information to the client. The ACCESS operation is still
useful for directory operations or for use in the case that the UNIX interface
access() is used on the client.
</t>
<t>
The information returned by the server in response to an ACCESS call
is not permanent. It was correct at the exact time that the server
performed the checks, but not necessarily afterwards. The server can
revoke access permission at any time.
</t>
<t>
The client should use the effective credentials of the user to build
the authentication information in the ACCESS request used to determine
access rights. It is the effective user and group credentials that
are used in subsequent READ and WRITE operations.
</t>
<t>
Many implementations do not directly support the ACCESS4_DELETE
permission. Operating systems like UNIX will ignore the ACCESS4_DELETE
bit if set on an access request on a non-directory object. In these
systems, delete permission on a file is determined by the access
permissions on the directory in which the file resides, instead of
being determined by the permissions of the file itself. Therefore,
the mask returned enumerating which access rights can be determined
will have the ACCESS4_DELETE value set to 0. This indicates to the
client that the server was unable to check that particular access
right. The ACCESS4_DELETE bit in the access mask returned will then be
ignored by the client.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CLOSE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 4: CLOSE - Close File</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CLOSE_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CLOSE4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: object */
seqid4 seqid;
stateid4 open_stateid;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CLOSE_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union CLOSE4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
stateid4 open_stateid;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CLOSE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CLOSE operation releases share reservations for the regular or
named attribute file as specified by the current filehandle. The
share reservations and other state information released at the server
as a result of this CLOSE are only those associated with the supplied
stateid. State associated with other OPENs is not affected.
</t>
<t>
If byte-range locks are held, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> release all locks before
sending a CLOSE. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> free all outstanding locks on CLOSE,
but some servers may not support the CLOSE of a file that still has
byte-range locks held. The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return failure if any locks would
exist after the CLOSE.
</t>
<t>
The argument seqid <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> have any value, and the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore seqid.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> require that the combination of principal, security
flavor, and, if applicable, GSS mechanism
that sent the OPEN request also be the one to CLOSE
the file. This might not be possible if credentials
for the principal are no longer available. The server
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> allow the machine credential or SSV credential
(see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) to send CLOSE.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CLOSE_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
Even though CLOSE returns a stateid, this stateid is not useful to the
client and should be treated as deprecated. CLOSE "shuts down" the
state associated with all OPENs for the file by a single open-owner.
As noted above, CLOSE will either release all file-locking state or
return an error. Therefore, the stateid returned by CLOSE is not
useful for operations that follow. To help find any uses of
this stateid by clients, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return the invalid
special stateid (the "other" value is zero and the "seqid" field
is NFS4_UINT32_MAX, see <xref target="special_stateid" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
A CLOSE operation may make delegations grantable
where they were not previously. Servers may choose to respond
immediately if there are pending delegation want requests or may
respond to the situation at a later time.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="OP_COMMIT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 5: COMMIT - Commit Cached Data</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_COMMIT_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct COMMIT4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
offset4 offset;
count4 count;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_COMMIT_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct COMMIT4resok {
verifier4 writeverf;
};
union COMMIT4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
COMMIT4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_COMMIT_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The COMMIT operation forces or flushes uncommitted, modified data to stable storage for the
file specified by the current filehandle. The flushed data is that
which was previously written with one or more WRITE operations that had the
"committed" field of their results field set to UNSTABLE4.
</t>
<t>
The offset specifies the position within the file where the flush is
to begin. An offset value of zero means to flush data starting at
the beginning of the file. The count specifies the number of bytes of
data to flush. If the count is zero, a flush from the offset to the end
of the file is done.
</t>
<t>
The server returns a write verifier upon successful completion of the
COMMIT. The write verifier is used by the client to determine if the
server has restarted between the initial WRITE operations and the
COMMIT. The client does this by comparing the write verifier returned
from the initial WRITE operations and the verifier returned by the COMMIT
operation. The server must vary the value of the write verifier at
each server event or instantiation that may lead to a loss of
uncommitted data. Most commonly this occurs when the server is
restarted; however, other events at the server may result in
uncommitted data loss as well.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_COMMIT_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The COMMIT operation is similar in operation and semantics to the
<xref target="fsync" format="default">POSIX fsync()</xref> system interface that synchronizes a file's state with the
disk (file data and metadata is flushed to disk or stable
storage). COMMIT performs the same operation for a client, flushing
any unsynchronized data and metadata on the server to the server's
disk or stable storage for the specified file. Like fsync(), it may
be that there is some modified data or no modified data to
synchronize. The data may have been synchronized by the server's
normal periodic buffer synchronization activity. COMMIT should return
NFS4_OK, unless there has been an unexpected error.
</t>
<t>
COMMIT differs from fsync() in that it is possible for the client to
flush a range of the file (most likely triggered by a
buffer-reclamation scheme on the client before the file has been
completely written).
</t>
<t>
The server implementation of COMMIT is reasonably simple. If the
server receives a full file COMMIT request, that is, starting at offset
zero and count zero, it should do the equivalent of applying fsync() to
the entire file.
Otherwise, it should arrange to have the modified data in the range
specified by offset and count to be flushed to stable storage. In
both cases, any metadata associated with the file must be flushed to
stable storage before returning. It is not an error for there to be
nothing to flush on the server. This means that the data and metadata
that needed to be flushed have already been flushed or lost during the
last server failure.
</t>
<t>
The client implementation of COMMIT is a little more complex. There
are two reasons for wanting to commit a client buffer to stable
storage. The first is that the client wants to reuse a buffer. In
this case, the offset and count of the buffer are sent to the server
in the COMMIT request. The server then flushes any modified data based
on the offset and count, and flushes any modified metadata associated with the
file. It then returns the status of the flush and the write verifier.
The second reason for the client to generate a COMMIT is for a full
file flush, such as may be done at close. In this case, the client
would gather all of the buffers for this file that contain uncommitted
data, do the COMMIT operation with an offset of zero and count of zero, and
then free all of those buffers. Any other dirty buffers would be sent
to the server in the normal fashion.
</t>
<t>
After a buffer is written (via the WRITE operation)
by the client with the "committed" field in the result of WRITE
set to UNSTABLE4, the buffer must be considered as modified by
the client
until the buffer has either been flushed via a COMMIT operation or
written via a WRITE operation with the "committed" field in the
result set to FILE_SYNC4
or DATA_SYNC4. This is done to prevent the buffer from being freed and
reused before the data can be flushed to stable storage on the server.
</t>
<t>
When a response is returned from either a WRITE or a COMMIT operation
and it contains a write verifier that differs from that previously
returned by the server, the client will need to retransmit all of the
buffers containing uncommitted data to the server. How this is
to be done is up to the implementor. If there is only one buffer of
interest, then it should be sent in a WRITE request
with the FILE_SYNC4 stable parameter. If there is more than one
buffer, it might be worthwhile retransmitting all of the buffers in
WRITE operations with the stable parameter set to UNSTABLE4 and then
retransmitting the COMMIT operation to flush all of the data on the
server to stable storage. However, if the server repeatably
returns from COMMIT a verifier that differs from that returned
by WRITE, the only way to ensure progress is to retransmit all
of the buffers with WRITE requests with the FILE_SYNC4 stable parameter.
</t>
<t>
The above description applies to page-cache-based systems as well as
buffer-cache-based systems. In the former systems, the virtual memory
system will need to be modified instead of the buffer cache.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CREATE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 6: CREATE - Create a Non-Regular File Object</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CREATE_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union createtype4 switch (nfs_ftype4 type) {
case NF4LNK:
linktext4 linkdata;
case NF4BLK:
case NF4CHR:
specdata4 devdata;
case NF4SOCK:
case NF4FIFO:
case NF4DIR:
void;
default:
void; /* server should return NFS4ERR_BADTYPE */
};
struct CREATE4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: directory for creation */
createtype4 objtype;
component4 objname;
fattr4 createattrs;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CREATE_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CREATE4resok {
change_info4 cinfo;
bitmap4 attrset; /* attributes set */
};
union CREATE4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
/* new CURRENTFH: created object */
CREATE4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CREATE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CREATE operation creates a file object other than an
ordinary file in a directory with a given name.
The OPEN operation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used to create a
regular file or a named attribute.
</t>
<t>
The current filehandle must be a directory: an object of type NF4DIR. If the current
filehandle is an attribute directory (type NF4ATTRDIR), the
error NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE is returned. If the current filehandle
designates any other type of object, the error NFS4ERR_NOTDIR
results.
</t>
<t>
The objname specifies the name for the new object.
The objtype determines the type of object to be
created: directory, symlink, etc. If the object
type specified is that of an ordinary file, a
named attribute, or a named attribute directory,
the error NFS4ERR_BADTYPE results.
</t>
<t>
If an object of the same name already exists in the directory, the
server will return the error NFS4ERR_EXIST.
</t>
<t>
For the directory where the new file object was created, the server
returns change_info4 information in cinfo. With the atomic field of
the change_info4 data type, the server will indicate if the before and
after change attributes were obtained atomically with respect to the
file object creation.
</t>
<t>
If the objname has a length of zero, or if objname does not obey
the UTF-8 definition, the error NFS4ERR_INVAL will be returned.
</t>
<t>
The current filehandle is replaced by that of the new object.
</t>
<t>
The createattrs specifies the initial set of attributes for the
object. The set of attributes may include any writable attribute
valid for the object type. When the operation is successful, the
server will return to the client an attribute mask signifying which
attributes were successfully set for the object.
</t>
<t>
If createattrs includes neither the owner attribute nor an ACL with an
ACE for the owner, and if the server's file system both supports and
requires an owner attribute (or an owner ACE), then the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
derive the owner (or the owner ACE). This would typically be from the
principal indicated in the RPC credentials of the call, but the
server's operating environment or file system semantics may dictate
other methods of derivation. Similarly, if createattrs includes
neither the group attribute nor a group ACE, and if the server's
file system both supports and requires the notion of a group attribute
(or group ACE), the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> derive the group attribute (or the
corresponding owner ACE) for the file. This could be from the RPC
call's credentials, such as the group principal if the credentials
include it (such as with AUTH_SYS), from the group identifier
associated with the principal in the credentials (e.g., POSIX
systems have a <xref target="passwd" format="default">user database</xref> that has a group identifier for every
user identifier), inherited from the directory in which the object is created,
or whatever else the server's operating environment or file system
semantics dictate. This applies to the OPEN operation too.
</t>
<t>
Conversely, it is possible that the client will specify in createattrs an
owner attribute, group attribute, or ACL that the principal indicated
the RPC call's credentials does not have permissions to create files
for. The error to be returned in this instance is NFS4ERR_PERM. This
applies to the OPEN operation too.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle designates a directory for which another
client holds a directory delegation, then, unless the delegation
is such that the situation can be resolved by sending a notification,
the delegation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled, and the CREATE operation <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> proceed
until the delegation is returned or revoked. Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while delegation remains outstanding.
</t>
<t>
When the current filehandle designates a directory for which
one or more directory delegations exist, then, when those delegations
request such notifications, NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY will be generated
as a result of this operation.
</t>
<t>
If the capability FSCHARSET_CAP4_ALLOWS_ONLY_UTF8 is set
(<xref target="utf8_caps" format="default"/>),
and a symbolic link is being created, then the content
of the symbolic link <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be in UTF-8 encoding.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CREATE_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the client desires to set attribute values after the create, a
SETATTR operation can be added to the COMPOUND request so that the
appropriate attributes will be set.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_DELEGPURGE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 7: DELEGPURGE - Purge Delegations Awaiting Recovery</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DELEGPURGE_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct DELEGPURGE4args {
clientid4 clientid;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DELEGPURGE_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct DELEGPURGE4res {
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DELEGPURGE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation purges all of the delegations awaiting recovery for a given client.
This is useful for clients that do not commit delegation information
to stable storage to indicate that conflicting requests need not be
delayed by the server awaiting recovery of delegation information.
</t>
<t>
The client is NOT specified by the clientid field of
the request. The client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set the client field
to zero, and the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore the clientid
field. Instead, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> derive the client ID
from the value of the session ID in the arguments of
the SEQUENCE operation that precedes DELEGPURGE in
the COMPOUND request.
</t>
<t>
The DELEGPURGE operation should be used by clients that record delegation
information on stable storage on the client. In this case,
after the client recovers all delegations it knows of,
it should immediately send a DELEGPURGE operation.
Doing so will notify the server that
no additional delegations for the client will be recovered allowing it
to free resources, and avoid delaying other clients which make requests
that conflict with the unrecovered delegations. The set of
delegations known to the server and the client might be different. The
reason for this is that after sending a request that
resulted in a delegation, the client might experience a failure
before it both received the delegation and
committed the delegation to the client's stable storage.
</t>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support DELEGPURGE, but if it does not, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
support CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> support CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_DELEGRETURN" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 8: DELEGRETURN - Return Delegation</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DELEGRETURN_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct DELEGRETURN4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: delegated object */
stateid4 deleg_stateid;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DELEGRETURN_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct DELEGRETURN4res {
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DELEGRETURN_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The DELEGRETURN operation returns the delegation represented by
the current filehandle and stateid.
</t>
<t>
Delegations may be returned voluntarily (i.e., before
the server has recalled them) or when recalled. In either case, the client must
properly propagate state changed under the context of the delegation to
the server before returning the delegation.
</t>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> require that the principal, security
flavor, and if applicable, the GSS mechanism, combination
that acquired the delegation also be the one to send
DELEGRETURN on the file. This might not be possible
if credentials for the principal are no longer
available. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> allow the machine credential
or SSV credential (see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) to send DELEGRETURN.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_GETATTR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 9: GETATTR - Get Attributes</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETATTR_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct GETATTR4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: object */
bitmap4 attr_request;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETATTR_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct GETATTR4resok {
fattr4 obj_attributes;
};
union GETATTR4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
GETATTR4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETATTR_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The GETATTR operation will obtain attributes for the file system
object specified by the current filehandle. The client sets a bit in
the bitmap argument for each attribute value that it would like the
server to return. The server returns an attribute bitmap that
indicates the attribute values that it was able to return,
which will include all attributes requested by the client that
are attributes supported by the server for the target
file system. This bitmap is followed by the attribute values ordered
lowest attribute number first.
</t>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return a value for each attribute that the client
requests if the attribute is supported by the server for the target
file system. If the server does not support a particular attribute
on the target file system, then it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return the attribute value
and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> set the attribute bit in the result bitmap. The server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return an error if it supports an attribute on the target
but cannot obtain its value. In that case, no attribute values will
be returned.
</t>
<t>
File systems that are absent should be treated as having support for
a very small set of attributes as described in
<xref target="absent_getattr" format="default"/>,
even if previously, when the file system was present, more attributes
were supported.
</t>
<t>
All servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attributes as specified in
<xref target="mandatory_attributes" format="default"/>, for all file systems,
with the exception of absent file systems.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETATTR_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
Suppose there is an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation held by another client for
the file
in question and size and/or change are among the set of attributes being interrogated. The server has two choices.
First, the server can obtain the actual
current value of these attributes from the client holding the delegation
by using the CB_GETATTR callback. Second, the server, particularly when the
delegated client is unresponsive, can recall the
delegation in question. The GETATTR <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> proceed
until one of the following occurs:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The requested attribute values are returned in the response to
CB_GETATTR.
</li>
<li>
The OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation is returned.
</li>
<li>
The OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation is revoked.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Unless one of the above happens very quickly,
one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be returned
while a delegation is outstanding.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_GETFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 10: GETFH - Get Current Filehandle</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETFH_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* CURRENT_FH: */
void;
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETFH_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct GETFH4resok {
nfs_fh4 object;
};
union GETFH4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
GETFH4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETFH_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation returns the current filehandle value.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
<t>
As described in <xref target="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" format="default"/>, GETFH
is <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> or <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> to
immediately follow certain operations, and servers
are free to reject such operations if
the client fails to insert
GETFH in the request as <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> or <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>.
<xref target="open_getfh_issue" format="default"/> provides additional
justification for why GETFH <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> follow OPEN.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETFH_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
Operations that change the current filehandle like LOOKUP or CREATE do
not automatically return the new filehandle as a result. For
instance, if a client needs to look up a directory entry and obtain its
filehandle, then the following request is needed.
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
PUTFH (directory filehandle)
</li>
<li>
LOOKUP (entry name)
</li>
<li>
GETFH
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LINK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 11: LINK - Create Link to a File</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LINK_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LINK4args {
/* SAVED_FH: source object */
/* CURRENT_FH: target directory */
component4 newname;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LINK_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LINK4resok {
change_info4 cinfo;
};
union LINK4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
LINK4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LINK_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The LINK operation creates an additional newname for the file
represented by the saved filehandle, as set by the SAVEFH operation,
in the directory represented by the current filehandle. The existing
file and the target directory must reside within the same file system
on the server. On success, the current filehandle will continue to be
the target directory. If an object exists in the target directory
with the same name as newname, the server must return NFS4ERR_EXIST.
</t>
<t>
For the target directory, the server returns change_info4 information
in cinfo. With the atomic field of the change_info4 data type, the
server will indicate if the before and after change attributes were
obtained atomically with respect to the link creation.
</t>
<t>
If the newname has a length of zero, or if newname does not obey
the UTF-8 definition, the error NFS4ERR_INVAL will be returned.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LINK_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> impose restrictions on the LINK operation such that
LINK may not be done when the file is open or when that open is done
by particular protocols, or with particular options or access modes.
When LINK is rejected because of such restrictions, the error
NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN is returned.
</t>
<t>
If a server does implement such restrictions and those restrictions
include cases of NFSv4 opens preventing successful execution of
a link, the server needs to recall any delegations that could
hide the existence of opens relevant to that decision. The reason
is that when a client holds a delegation, the server
might not have an accurate account of the opens for that client, since
the client may execute OPENs and CLOSEs locally. The LINK operation
must be delayed only until a definitive result can be obtained.
For example, suppose there are multiple delegations and one of them establishes
an open whose presence would prevent the link. Given the server's
semantics, NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN may be returned to the caller as soon
as that delegation is returned without waiting for other delegations
to be returned. Similarly, if such opens are not associated with
delegations, NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN can be returned immediately with no
delegation recall being done.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle designates a directory for which another
client holds a directory delegation, then, unless the delegation
is such that the situation can be resolved by sending a notification,
the delegation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled, and the operation cannot be
performed successfully until the delegation is returned or revoked. Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while delegation remains outstanding.
</t>
<t>
When the current filehandle designates a directory for which
one or more directory delegations exist, then, when those delegations
request such notifications, instead of a recall,
NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY will be generated
as a result of the LINK operation.
</t>
<t>
If the current file system supports the numlinks attribute, and
other clients have delegations to the file being linked, then those
delegations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled and the LINK operation <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> proceed until
all delegations are returned or revoked. Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while delegation remains outstanding.
</t>
<t>
Changes to any property of the "hard" linked files are reflected in
all of the linked files. When a link is made to a file, the
attributes for the file should have a value for numlinks that is one
greater than the value before the LINK operation.
</t>
<t>
The statement "file and the target directory must reside within the
same file system on the server" means that the fsid fields in the
attributes for the objects are the same. If they reside on
different file systems, the error NFS4ERR_XDEV is returned.
This error may be returned by some servers when there is an
internal partitioning of a file system that the LINK operation
would violate.
</t>
<t>
On some
servers, "." and ".." are illegal values for newname
and the error NFS4ERR_BADNAME will be returned if they are specified.
</t>
<t>
When the current filehandle designates a named attribute directory
and the object to be linked (the saved filehandle) is not a named
attribute for the same object, the error NFS4ERR_XDEV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
returned. When the saved filehandle designates a named attribute
and the current filehandle is not the appropriate named attribute
directory, the error NFS4ERR_XDEV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> also be returned.
</t>
<t>
When the current filehandle designates a named attribute directory
and the object to be linked (the saved filehandle) is a named
attribute within that directory, the server may return
the error NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP.
</t>
<t>
In the case that newname is already linked to the file represented by
the saved filehandle, the server will return NFS4ERR_EXIST.
</t>
<t>
Note that symbolic links are created with the CREATE operation.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LOCK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 12: LOCK - Create Lock</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCK_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* For LOCK, transition from open_stateid and lock_owner
* to a lock stateid.
*/
struct open_to_lock_owner4 {
seqid4 open_seqid;
stateid4 open_stateid;
seqid4 lock_seqid;
lock_owner4 lock_owner;
};
/*
* For LOCK, existing lock stateid continues to request new
* file lock for the same lock_owner and open_stateid.
*/
struct exist_lock_owner4 {
stateid4 lock_stateid;
seqid4 lock_seqid;
};
union locker4 switch (bool new_lock_owner) {
case TRUE:
open_to_lock_owner4 open_owner;
case FALSE:
exist_lock_owner4 lock_owner;
};
/*
* LOCK/LOCKT/LOCKU: Record lock management
*/
struct LOCK4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
nfs_lock_type4 locktype;
bool reclaim;
offset4 offset;
length4 length;
locker4 locker;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCK_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LOCK4denied {
offset4 offset;
length4 length;
nfs_lock_type4 locktype;
lock_owner4 owner;
};
struct LOCK4resok {
stateid4 lock_stateid;
};
union LOCK4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
LOCK4resok resok4;
case NFS4ERR_DENIED:
LOCK4denied denied;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCK_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The LOCK operation requests a byte-range lock for the byte-range specified
by the offset and length parameters, and lock type specified in
the locktype parameter. If this is a reclaim request, the
reclaim parameter will be TRUE.
</t>
<t>
Bytes in a file may be locked even if those bytes are not currently
allocated to the file. To lock the file from a specific offset
through the end-of-file (no matter how long the file actually is) use
a length field equal to NFS4_UINT64_MAX.
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL under the following
combinations of length and offset:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Length is equal to zero.
</li>
<li>
Length is not equal to NFS4_UINT64_MAX, and the sum of length
and offset exceeds NFS4_UINT64_MAX.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
32-bit servers are servers that support locking for
byte offsets that fit within 32 bits (i.e., less than
or equal to NFS4_UINT32_MAX). If the client specifies a
range that overlaps one or more bytes beyond offset
NFS4_UINT32_MAX but does not end at offset
NFS4_UINT64_MAX, then such a 32-bit server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the
error NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE.
</t>
<t>
If the server returns NFS4ERR_DENIED, the
owner, offset, and length
of a conflicting lock are returned.
</t>
<t>
The locker argument specifies the lock-owner that is associated with
the LOCK operation. The locker4 structure is a switched union that
indicates whether the client has already created byte-range locking
state associated with the current open file and lock-owner. In the
case in which it has, the argument is just a stateid representing
the set of
locks associated with that open file and lock-owner, together with
a lock_seqid value that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be any value and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored
by the server.
In the case where no byte-range locking state has been established, or the client
does not have the stateid available, the argument contains the
stateid of the open file with which this lock is to be associated,
together with the lock-owner with which the lock is to be associated.
The open_to_lock_owner case covers the very first lock done by a
lock-owner for a given open file and offers a method to use the
established state of the open_stateid to transition to the use of
a lock stateid.
</t>
<t>
The following fields of the locker parameter <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be
set to any value by the client and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored
by the server:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The clientid field of the lock_owner
field of the open_owner field
(locker.open_owner.lock_owner.clientid). The
reason the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore the clientid field
is that the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> derive the client ID from
the session ID from the SEQUENCE operation of the
COMPOUND request.
</li>
<li>
The open_seqid and lock_seqid fields of the
open_owner field (locker.open_owner.open_seqid and
locker.open_owner.lock_seqid).
</li>
<li>
The lock_seqid field of the lock_owner field
(locker.lock_owner.lock_seqid).
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Note that the client ID appearing in a LOCK4denied
structure is the actual client associated with the
conflicting lock, whether this is the client ID
associated with the current session or a different
one. Thus, if the server returns NFS4ERR_DENIED,
it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the clientid field of the owner field of the
denied field.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle is not an ordinary file, an error will be
returned to the client. In the case that the current filehandle
represents an object of type NF4DIR, NFS4ERR_ISDIR is returned.
If the current filehandle designates a symbolic link,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK is returned. In all other cases,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE is returned.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCK_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the server is unable to determine the exact offset and length of
the conflicting byte-range lock, the same offset and length that were provided in
the arguments should be returned in the denied results.
</t>
<t>
LOCK operations are subject to permission checks and to checks against
the access type of the associated file. However, the specific right
and modes required for various types of locks reflect the semantics of
the server-exported file system, and are not specified by the protocol.
For example, Windows 2000 allows a write lock of a file open for read access,
while a POSIX-compliant system does not.
</t>
<t>
When the client sends a LOCK operation that corresponds to a range that
the lock-owner has locked already (with the same or different lock
type), or to a sub-range of such a range, or to a byte-range that
includes multiple locks already granted to that lock-owner, in whole or
in part, and the server does not support such locking operations
(i.e., does not support POSIX locking semantics), the server will
return the error NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE. In that case, the client may
return an error, or it may emulate the required operations, using only
LOCK for ranges that do not include any bytes already locked by that
lock-owner and LOCKU of locks held by that lock-owner (specifying an
exactly matching range and type). Similarly, when the client sends a
LOCK operation that amounts to upgrading (changing from a READ_LT lock to a
WRITE_LT lock) or downgrading (changing from WRITE_LT lock to a READ_LT lock)
an existing byte-range lock, and the server does not support such a lock,
the server will return NFS4ERR_LOCK_NOTSUPP. Such operations may not
perfectly reflect the required semantics in the face of conflicting
LOCK operations from other clients.
</t>
<t>
When a client holds an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, the client holding that
delegation is assured that there are no opens by other clients.
Thus, there can be no conflicting LOCK operations from such clients.
Therefore, the client may be handling locking requests locally,
without
doing LOCK operations on the server. If it does that, it must be
prepared to update the lock status on the server, by sending
appropriate LOCK and LOCKU operations before returning
the delegation.
</t>
<t>
When one or more clients hold OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegations, any LOCK operation
where the server is implementing mandatory locking semantics <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
result in the recall of all such delegations. The LOCK operation may
not be granted until all such delegations are returned or revoked.
Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while the delegation remains outstanding.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LOCKT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 13: LOCKT - Test for Lock</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCKT_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LOCKT4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
nfs_lock_type4 locktype;
offset4 offset;
length4 length;
lock_owner4 owner;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCKT_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union LOCKT4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4ERR_DENIED:
LOCK4denied denied;
case NFS4_OK:
void;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCKT_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The LOCKT operation tests the lock as specified in the arguments. If
a conflicting lock exists, the owner, offset, length, and type of the
conflicting lock are returned.
The owner field in the results includes the client ID of the owner of
the conflicting lock, whether this is the client ID associated with the
current session or a different client ID.
If no lock is held, nothing other than
NFS4_OK is returned. Lock types READ_LT and READW_LT are processed in
the same way in that a conflicting lock test is done without regard to
blocking or non-blocking. The same is true for WRITE_LT and WRITEW_LT.
</t>
<t>
The ranges are specified as for LOCK. The NFS4ERR_INVAL and
NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE errors are returned under the same circumstances
as for LOCK.
</t>
<t>
The clientid field of the owner <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be set to
any value by the client and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by
the server. The reason the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore the
clientid field is that the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> derive the
client ID from the session ID from the SEQUENCE
operation of the COMPOUND request.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle is not an ordinary file, an error will be
returned to the client. In the case that the current filehandle
represents an object of type NF4DIR, NFS4ERR_ISDIR is returned.
If the current filehandle designates a symbolic link,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK is returned. In all other cases,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE is returned.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCKT_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the server is unable to determine the exact offset
and length of the conflicting lock, the same offset
and length that were provided in the arguments should
be returned in the denied results.
</t>
<t>
LOCKT uses a lock_owner4 rather a stateid4, as is used in
LOCK to identify the owner. This is because the client does not
have to open the file to test for the existence of a lock, so
a stateid might not be available.
</t>
<t>
As noted in <xref target="OP_LOCK_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>, some
servers may return NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE to certain (otherwise
non-conflicting) LOCK operations that overlap ranges already
granted to the current lock-owner.
</t>
<t>
The LOCKT operation's test for conflicting locks <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> exclude
locks for the current lock-owner, and thus should return NFS4_OK in
such cases. Note that this means that a server might return
NFS4_OK to a LOCKT request even though a LOCK operation for the
same range and lock-owner would fail with NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE.
</t>
<t>
When a client holds an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, it may choose
(see <xref target="OP_LOCK_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>) to handle LOCK
requests locally. In such a case, LOCKT requests will similarly
be handled locally.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LOCKU" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 14: LOCKU - Unlock File</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCKU_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LOCKU4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
nfs_lock_type4 locktype;
seqid4 seqid;
stateid4 lock_stateid;
offset4 offset;
length4 length;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCKU_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union LOCKU4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
stateid4 lock_stateid;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCKU_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The LOCKU operation unlocks the byte-range lock specified by the
parameters. The client may set the locktype field to any value that is
legal for the nfs_lock_type4 enumerated type, and the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
accept any legal value for locktype. Any legal value for locktype has
no effect on the success or failure of the LOCKU operation.
</t>
<t>
The ranges are specified as for LOCK. The NFS4ERR_INVAL and
NFS4ERR_BAD_RANGE errors are returned under the same circumstances as
for LOCK.
</t>
<t>
The seqid parameter <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be any value and the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore it.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle is not an ordinary file, an error will be
returned to the client. In the case that the current filehandle
represents an object of type NF4DIR, NFS4ERR_ISDIR is returned.
If the current filehandle designates a symbolic link,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK is returned. In all other cases,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE is returned.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> require that the principal, security
flavor, and if applicable, the GSS mechanism, combination
that sent a LOCK operation also be the one to send
LOCKU on the file. This might not be possible
if credentials for the principal are no longer
available. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> allow the machine credential
or SSV credential (see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) to send LOCKU.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOCKU_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the area to be unlocked does not correspond exactly to a lock
actually held by the lock-owner, the server may return the error
NFS4ERR_LOCK_RANGE. This includes the case in which the area is not
locked, where the area is a sub-range of the area locked, where it
overlaps the area locked without matching exactly, or the area
specified includes multiple locks held by the lock-owner. In all of
these cases, allowed by <xref target="fcntl" format="default">POSIX locking</xref> semantics, a client receiving
this error should, if it desires support for such operations, simulate
the operation using LOCKU on ranges corresponding to locks it actually
holds, possibly followed by LOCK operations for the sub-ranges not being
unlocked.
</t>
<t>
When a client holds an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, it may choose
(see <xref target="OP_LOCK_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>) to handle LOCK
requests locally. In such a case, LOCKU operations will similarly
be handled locally.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LOOKUP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 15: LOOKUP - Lookup Filename</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOOKUP_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LOOKUP4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: directory */
component4 objname;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOOKUP_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LOOKUP4res {
/* New CURRENT_FH: object */
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOOKUP_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The LOOKUP operation looks up or finds a file system object using the
directory specified by the current filehandle. LOOKUP evaluates the
component and if the object exists, the current filehandle is replaced
with the component's filehandle.
</t>
<t>
If the component cannot be evaluated either because it does not exist
or because the client does not have permission to evaluate the
component, then an error will be returned and the current filehandle
will be unchanged.
</t>
<t>
If the component is a zero-length string or if any component does not
obey the UTF-8 definition, the error NFS4ERR_INVAL will be returned.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOOKUP_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the client wants to achieve the effect of a multi-component look up,
it may construct a COMPOUND request such as (and obtain each
filehandle):
</t>
<sourcecode type="nfsv4compound"><![CDATA[
PUTFH (directory filehandle)
LOOKUP "pub"
GETFH
LOOKUP "foo"
GETFH
LOOKUP "bar"
GETFH]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Unlike NFSv3, NFSv4.1 allows LOOKUP requests to cross mountpoints on the
server. The client can detect a mountpoint crossing by comparing the
fsid attribute of the directory with the fsid attribute of the
directory looked up. If the fsids are different, then the new
directory is a server mountpoint. UNIX clients that detect a
mountpoint crossing will need to mount the server's file system. This
needs to be done to maintain the file object identity checking
mechanisms common to UNIX clients.
</t>
<t>
Servers that limit NFS access to "shared" or "exported" file systems
should provide a pseudo file system into which the exported file systems
can be integrated, so that clients can browse the server's namespace.
The clients view of a pseudo file system will be limited to paths that
lead to exported file systems.
</t>
<t>
Note: previous versions of the protocol assigned special semantics to
the names "." and "..". NFSv4.1 assigns no special semantics to
these names. The LOOKUPP operator must be used to look up a parent
directory.
</t>
<t>
Note that this operation does not follow symbolic links. The client
is responsible for all parsing of filenames including filenames that
are modified by symbolic links encountered during the look up process.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle supplied is not a directory but a symbolic
link, the error NFS4ERR_SYMLINK is returned as the error. For all
other non-directory file types, the error NFS4ERR_NOTDIR is returned.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LOOKUPP" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 16: LOOKUPP - Lookup Parent Directory</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOOKUPP_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* CURRENT_FH: object */
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOOKUPP_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LOOKUPP4res {
/* new CURRENT_FH: parent directory */
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOOKUPP_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The current filehandle is assumed to refer to a regular
directory or a named attribute directory. LOOKUPP assigns the
filehandle for its parent directory to be the current
filehandle. If there is no parent directory, an NFS4ERR_NOENT
error must be returned. Therefore, NFS4ERR_NOENT will be
returned by the server when the current filehandle is at the
root or top of the server's file tree.
</t>
<t>
As is the case with LOOKUP, LOOKUPP will also cross mountpoints.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle is not a directory or named attribute
directory, the error NFS4ERR_NOTDIR is returned.
</t>
<t>
If the requester's security flavor does not match that
configured for the parent directory, then the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC (a future minor revision of NFSv4 may
upgrade this to <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>) in the LOOKUPP response. However, if the
server does so, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the SECINFO_NO_NAME
operation (<xref target="OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME" format="default"/>), so that the client can gracefully determine the
correct security flavor.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle is a named attribute directory that is
associated with a file system object via OPENATTR (i.e., not a
sub-directory of a named attribute directory), LOOKUPP <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
return the filehandle of the associated file system object.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LOOKUPP_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
An issue to note is upward navigation from named attribute
directories. The named attribute directories are essentially
detached from the namespace, and this property should be safely
represented in the client operating environment. LOOKUPP on a
named attribute directory may return the filehandle of the
associated file, and conveying this to applications might be
unsafe as many applications expect the parent of an object to
always be a directory. Therefore, the client may want to hide
the parent of named attribute directories (represented as ".."
in UNIX) or represent the named attribute directory as its own
parent (as is typically done for the file system root directory in
UNIX).
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_NVERIFY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 17: NVERIFY - Verify Difference in Attributes</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_NVERIFY_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct NVERIFY4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: object */
fattr4 obj_attributes;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_NVERIFY_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct NVERIFY4res {
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_NVERIFY_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation is used to prefix a sequence of operations to be
performed if one or more attributes have changed on some file system
object. If all the attributes match, then the error NFS4ERR_SAME <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be returned.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_NVERIFY_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
This operation is useful as a cache validation operator. If the
object to which the attributes belong has changed, then the following
operations may obtain new data associated with that object, for
instance, to check if a file has been changed and obtain new data if
it has:
</t>
<sourcecode type="nfsv4compound"><![CDATA[
SEQUENCE
PUTFH fh
NVERIFY attrbits attrs
READ 0 32767]]></sourcecode>
<t>
Contrast this with NFSv3, which would first send a GETATTR in
one request/reply round trip, and then if attributes indicated that
the client's cache was stale, then send a READ in another request/reply
round trip.
</t>
<t>
In the case that a <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attribute is specified in the NVERIFY
operation and the server does not support that attribute for the
file system object, the error NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP is returned to the
client.
</t>
<t>
When the attribute rdattr_error or any set-only attribute (e.g.,
time_modify_set) is specified, the error NFS4ERR_INVAL is returned to
the client.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_OPEN" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 18: OPEN - Open a Regular File</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPEN_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* Various definitions for OPEN
*/
enum createmode4 {
UNCHECKED4 = 0,
GUARDED4 = 1,
/* Deprecated in NFSv4.1. */
EXCLUSIVE4 = 2,
/*
* New to NFSv4.1. If session is persistent,
* GUARDED4 MUST be used. Otherwise, use
* EXCLUSIVE4_1 instead of EXCLUSIVE4.
*/
EXCLUSIVE4_1 = 3
};
struct creatverfattr {
verifier4 cva_verf;
fattr4 cva_attrs;
};
union createhow4 switch (createmode4 mode) {
case UNCHECKED4:
case GUARDED4:
fattr4 createattrs;
case EXCLUSIVE4:
verifier4 createverf;
case EXCLUSIVE4_1:
creatverfattr ch_createboth;
};
enum opentype4 {
OPEN4_NOCREATE = 0,
OPEN4_CREATE = 1
};
union openflag4 switch (opentype4 opentype) {
case OPEN4_CREATE:
createhow4 how;
default:
void;
};
/* Next definitions used for OPEN delegation */
enum limit_by4 {
NFS_LIMIT_SIZE = 1,
NFS_LIMIT_BLOCKS = 2
/* others as needed */
};
struct nfs_modified_limit4 {
uint32_t num_blocks;
uint32_t bytes_per_block;
};
union nfs_space_limit4 switch (limit_by4 limitby) {
/* limit specified as file size */
case NFS_LIMIT_SIZE:
uint64_t filesize;
/* limit specified by number of blocks */
case NFS_LIMIT_BLOCKS:
nfs_modified_limit4 mod_blocks;
} ;
/*
* Share Access and Deny constants for open argument
*/
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ = 0x00000001;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE = 0x00000002;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH = 0x00000003;
const OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE = 0x00000000;
const OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ = 0x00000001;
const OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE = 0x00000002;
const OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH = 0x00000003;
/* new flags for share_access field of OPEN4args */
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_DELEG_MASK = 0xFF00;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_NO_PREFERENCE = 0x0000;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_READ_DELEG = 0x0100;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_WRITE_DELEG = 0x0200;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_ANY_DELEG = 0x0300;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_NO_DELEG = 0x0400;
const OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_CANCEL = 0x0500;
const
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL
= 0x10000;
const
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED
= 0x20000;
enum open_delegation_type4 {
OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE = 0,
OPEN_DELEGATE_READ = 1,
OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE = 2,
OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT = 3 /* new to v4.1 */
};
enum open_claim_type4 {
/*
* Not a reclaim.
*/
CLAIM_NULL = 0,
CLAIM_PREVIOUS = 1,
CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR = 2,
CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV = 3,
/*
* Not a reclaim.
*
* Like CLAIM_NULL, but object identified
* by the current filehandle.
*/
CLAIM_FH = 4, /* new to v4.1 */
/*
* Like CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR, but object identified
* by current filehandle.
*/
CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH = 5, /* new to v4.1 */
/*
* Like CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV, but object identified
* by current filehandle.
*/
CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH = 6 /* new to v4.1 */
};
struct open_claim_delegate_cur4 {
stateid4 delegate_stateid;
component4 file;
};
union open_claim4 switch (open_claim_type4 claim) {
/*
* No special rights to file.
* Ordinary OPEN of the specified file.
*/
case CLAIM_NULL:
/* CURRENT_FH: directory */
component4 file;
/*
* Right to the file established by an
* open previous to server reboot. File
* identified by filehandle obtained at
* that time rather than by name.
*/
case CLAIM_PREVIOUS:
/* CURRENT_FH: file being reclaimed */
open_delegation_type4 delegate_type;
/*
* Right to file based on a delegation
* granted by the server. File is
* specified by name.
*/
case CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR:
/* CURRENT_FH: directory */
open_claim_delegate_cur4 delegate_cur_info;
/*
* Right to file based on a delegation
* granted to a previous boot instance
* of the client. File is specified by name.
*/
case CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV:
/* CURRENT_FH: directory */
component4 file_delegate_prev;
/*
* Like CLAIM_NULL. No special rights
* to file. Ordinary OPEN of the
* specified file by current filehandle.
*/
case CLAIM_FH: /* new to v4.1 */
/* CURRENT_FH: regular file to open */
void;
/*
* Like CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV. Right to file based on a
* delegation granted to a previous boot
* instance of the client. File is identified
* by filehandle.
*/
case CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH: /* new to v4.1 */
/* CURRENT_FH: file being opened */
void;
/*
* Like CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR. Right to file based on
* a delegation granted by the server.
* File is identified by filehandle.
*/
case CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH: /* new to v4.1 */
/* CURRENT_FH: file being opened */
stateid4 oc_delegate_stateid;
};
/*
* OPEN: Open a file, potentially receiving an OPEN delegation
*/
struct OPEN4args {
seqid4 seqid;
uint32_t share_access;
uint32_t share_deny;
open_owner4 owner;
openflag4 openhow;
open_claim4 claim;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPEN_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct open_read_delegation4 {
stateid4 stateid; /* Stateid for delegation*/
bool recall; /* Pre-recalled flag for
delegations obtained
by reclaim (CLAIM_PREVIOUS) */
nfsace4 permissions; /* Defines users who don't
need an ACCESS call to
open for read */
};
struct open_write_delegation4 {
stateid4 stateid; /* Stateid for delegation */
bool recall; /* Pre-recalled flag for
delegations obtained
by reclaim
(CLAIM_PREVIOUS) */
nfs_space_limit4
space_limit; /* Defines condition that
the client must check to
determine whether the
file needs to be flushed
to the server on close. */
nfsace4 permissions; /* Defines users who don't
need an ACCESS call as
part of a delegated
open. */
};
enum why_no_delegation4 { /* new to v4.1 */
WND4_NOT_WANTED = 0,
WND4_CONTENTION = 1,
WND4_RESOURCE = 2,
WND4_NOT_SUPP_FTYPE = 3,
WND4_WRITE_DELEG_NOT_SUPP_FTYPE = 4,
WND4_NOT_SUPP_UPGRADE = 5,
WND4_NOT_SUPP_DOWNGRADE = 6,
WND4_CANCELLED = 7,
WND4_IS_DIR = 8
};
union open_none_delegation4 /* new to v4.1 */
switch (why_no_delegation4 ond_why) {
case WND4_CONTENTION:
bool ond_server_will_push_deleg;
case WND4_RESOURCE:
bool ond_server_will_signal_avail;
default:
void;
};
union open_delegation4
switch (open_delegation_type4 delegation_type) {
case OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE:
void;
case OPEN_DELEGATE_READ:
open_read_delegation4 read;
case OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE:
open_write_delegation4 write;
case OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT: /* new to v4.1 */
open_none_delegation4 od_whynone;
};
/*
* Result flags
*/
/* Client must confirm open */
const OPEN4_RESULT_CONFIRM = 0x00000002;
/* Type of file locking behavior at the server */
const OPEN4_RESULT_LOCKTYPE_POSIX = 0x00000004;
/* Server will preserve file if removed while open */
const OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED = 0x00000008;
/*
* Server may use CB_NOTIFY_LOCK on locks
* derived from this open
*/
const OPEN4_RESULT_MAY_NOTIFY_LOCK = 0x00000020;
struct OPEN4resok {
stateid4 stateid; /* Stateid for open */
change_info4 cinfo; /* Directory Change Info */
uint32_t rflags; /* Result flags */
bitmap4 attrset; /* attribute set for create*/
open_delegation4 delegation; /* Info on any open
delegation */
};
union OPEN4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
/* New CURRENT_FH: opened file */
OPEN4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPEN_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The OPEN operation opens a regular file in a
directory with the provided name or filehandle.
OPEN can also create a file if a name is provided,
and the client specifies it wants to create a file.
Specification of whether or not a file is to be created,
and the method of creation is via the openhow
parameter. The openhow parameter consists of
a switched union (data type opengflag4), which
switches on the value of opentype (OPEN4_NOCREATE
or OPEN4_CREATE). If OPEN4_CREATE is specified,
this leads to another switched union (data type
createhow4) that supports four cases of creation
methods: UNCHECKED4, GUARDED4, EXCLUSIVE4,
or EXCLUSIVE4_1. If opentype is OPEN4_CREATE,
then the claim field of the claim field
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be one of CLAIM_NULL, CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR, or
CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV, because these claim methods
include a component of a file name.
</t>
<t>
Upon success (which might entail creation of a new
file), the current filehandle is replaced by that
of the created or existing object.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle is a named attribute
directory, OPEN will then create or open a named
attribute file. Note that exclusive create
of a named attribute is not supported. If the
createmode is EXCLUSIVE4 or EXCLUSIVE4_1 and the
current filehandle is a named attribute directory,
the server will return EINVAL.
</t>
<t>
UNCHECKED4 means that the file should be created if a
file of that name does not exist and encountering an
existing regular file of that name is not an error.
For this type of create, createattrs specifies the
initial set of attributes for the file. The set
of attributes may include any writable attribute
valid for regular files. When an UNCHECKED4
create encounters an existing file, the attributes
specified by createattrs are not used, except that
when createattrs specifies the size attribute
with a size of zero, the existing file is truncated.
</t>
<t>
If GUARDED4 is specified, the server checks for
the presence of a duplicate object by name before
performing the create. If a duplicate exists,
NFS4ERR_EXIST is returned.
If the object does not exist, the request is
performed as described for UNCHECKED4.
</t>
<t>
For the UNCHECKED4 and GUARDED4 cases, where the
operation is successful, the server will return
to the client an attribute mask signifying which
attributes were successfully set for the object.
</t>
<t>
EXCLUSIVE4_1 and EXCLUSIVE4
specify that the server is to follow exclusive
creation semantics, using the verifier to ensure
exclusive creation of the target. The server should
check for the presence of a duplicate object by name.
If the object does not exist, the server creates
the object and stores the verifier with the object.
If the object does exist and the stored verifier
matches the client provided verifier, the server
uses the existing object as the newly created object.
If the stored verifier does not match, then an error
of NFS4ERR_EXIST is returned.
</t>
<t>
If using EXCLUSIVE4, and if the server uses attributes to
store the exclusive create verifier, the server will signify
which attributes it used by setting the appropriate bits in
the attribute mask that is returned in the results.
Unlike UNCHECKED4, GUARDED4, and EXCLUSIVE4_1, EXCLUSIVE4 does
not support the setting of attributes at file creation, and
after a successful OPEN via EXCLUSIVE4, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
send a SETATTR to set attributes to a known state.
</t>
<t>
In NFSv4.1, EXCLUSIVE4 has been deprecated in favor
of EXCLUSIVE4_1.
Unlike EXCLUSIVE4, attributes may be provided
in the EXCLUSIVE4_1 case, but because the server
may use attributes of the target object to store
the verifier, the set of allowable attributes
may be fewer than the set of attributes SETATTR
allows. The allowable attributes for EXCLUSIVE4_1
are indicated in the suppattr_exclcreat (<xref target="attrdef_suppattr_exclcreat" format="default"/>) attribute. If the client
attempts to set in cva_attrs an attribute that is not in
suppattr_exclcreat, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL.
The response field, attrset, indicates both which attributes
the server set from cva_attrs and which attributes the
server used to store the verifier. As described
in <xref target="OP_OPEN_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>, the client can compare
cva_attrs.attrmask with attrset to determine which attributes
were used to store the verifier.
</t>
<t>
With the addition of persistent sessions and
pNFS, under some conditions EXCLUSIVE4 <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
be used by the client or supported by the server.
The following table summarizes the appropriate and
mandated exclusive create methods for implementations
of NFSv4.1:
</t>
<table anchor="exclusive_create" align="center">
<name>Required Methods for Exclusive Create</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Persistent Reply Cache Enabled</th>
<th align="left">Server Supports pNFS</th>
<th align="left">Server <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14></th>
<th align="left">Client Allowed</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">no</td>
<td align="left">no</td>
<td align="left">EXCLUSIVE4_1 and EXCLUSIVE4</td>
<td align="left">EXCLUSIVE4_1 (<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>) or EXCLUSIVE4 (<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">no</td>
<td align="left">yes</td>
<td align="left">EXCLUSIVE4_1</td>
<td align="left">EXCLUSIVE4_1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">yes</td>
<td align="left">no</td>
<td align="left">GUARDED4</td>
<td align="left">GUARDED4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">yes</td>
<td align="left">yes</td>
<td align="left">GUARDED4</td>
<td align="left">GUARDED4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
If CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_PERSIST is set in the results
of CREATE_SESSION, the reply cache is persistent (see <xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>).
If the EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS flag is set in the
results from EXCHANGE_ID, the server is a pNFS server (see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>).
If the client attempts to use EXCLUSIVE4 on a persistent session,
or a session derived from an
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS client ID, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
<t>
With persistent sessions, exclusive create semantics
are fully achievable via GUARDED4, and so EXCLUSIVE4
or EXCLUSIVE4_1 <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used. When pNFS is
being used, the layout_hint attribute might
not be supported after the file is created. Only the
EXCLUSIVE4_1 and GUARDED methods of exclusive file
creation allow the atomic setting of attributes.
</t>
<t>
For the target directory, the server returns change_info4 information
in cinfo. With the atomic field of the change_info4 data type, the
server will indicate if the before and after change attributes were
obtained atomically with respect to the link creation.
</t>
<t>
The OPEN operation provides for Windows share
reservation capability with the use of the
share_access and share_deny fields of the OPEN
arguments. The client specifies at OPEN the required
share_access and share_deny modes. For clients
that do not directly support SHAREs (i.e., UNIX), the
expected deny value is OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE. In the case that
there is an existing SHARE reservation that conflicts
with the OPEN request, the server returns the error
NFS4ERR_SHARE_DENIED. For additional discussion of
SHARE semantics, see <xref target="share_reserve" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
For each OPEN, the client provides a value for
the owner field of the OPEN argument. The owner
field is of data type open_owner4, and contains a
field called clientid and a field called owner. The
client can set the clientid field to any value and
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore it. Instead, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
derive the client ID from the session ID of the
SEQUENCE operation of the COMPOUND request.
</t>
<t>
The "seqid" field of the request is not used in
NFSv4.1, but it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be any value and the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
ignore it.
</t>
<t>
In the case that the client is recovering state from a server failure,
the claim field of the OPEN argument is used to signify that the
request is meant to reclaim state previously held.
</t>
<t>
The "claim" field of the OPEN argument is used to specify the file to
be opened and the state information that the client claims to
possess. There are seven claim types as follows:
</t>
<table align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">open type</th>
<th align="left">description</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">
CLAIM_NULL,
CLAIM_FH
</td>
<td align="left">
For the client, this is a new OPEN request and there is no
previous state associated with the file for the client. With
CLAIM_NULL, the file is identified by the current filehandle
and the specified component name. With CLAIM_FH (new to NFSv4.1),
the file is identified by just the current filehandle.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
CLAIM_PREVIOUS
</td>
<td align="left">
The client is claiming basic OPEN state for a file that was held
previous to a server restart. Generally used when a server is
returning persistent filehandles; the client may not have the file
name to reclaim the OPEN.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR,
CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH
</td>
<td align="left">
The client is claiming a delegation for OPEN
as granted by the server. Generally, this
is done as part of recalling a delegation. With
CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR, the file is identified by
the current filehandle and the specified component
name. With CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH (new to NFSv4.1), the
file is identified by just the current filehandle.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV,
CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH
</td>
<td align="left">
The client is claiming a delegation granted to a
previous client instance; used after the client
restarts. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV
and/or CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH (new to NFSv4.1). If it
does support either claim type, CREATE_SESSION <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> remove the client's delegation state, and the
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support the DELEGPURGE operation.
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
For OPEN requests that reach the server during
the grace period, the server returns an error
of NFS4ERR_GRACE. The following claim types are
exceptions:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
OPEN requests specifying the claim type CLAIM_PREVIOUS are devoted to
reclaiming opens after a server restart and are typically only
valid during the grace period.
</li>
<li>
OPEN requests specifying the claim types CLAIM_DELEGATE_CUR and
CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH are valid both during and after the grace period.
Since the granting of the delegation that they are subordinate
to assures that there is no conflict with locks to be reclaimed
by other clients, the server need not return NFS4ERR_GRACE when
these are received during the grace period.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
For any OPEN request, the server may return an OPEN delegation, which
allows further opens and closes to be handled locally on the client as
described in <xref target="open_delegation" format="default"/>. Note that delegation is
up to the server to decide. The client should never assume that
delegation will or will not be granted in a particular instance. It
should always be prepared for either case. A partial exception is the
reclaim (CLAIM_PREVIOUS) case, in which a delegation type is claimed.
In this case, delegation will always be granted, although the server
may specify an immediate recall in the delegation structure.
</t>
<t>
The rflags returned by a successful OPEN allow the server to return
information governing how the open file is to be handled.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
OPEN4_RESULT_CONFIRM is deprecated and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be returned
by an NFSv4.1 server.
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_RESULT_LOCKTYPE_POSIX indicates that the server's byte-range locking
behavior supports the complete set of POSIX locking techniques <xref target="fcntl" format="default"/>. From
this, the client can choose to manage byte-range locking state in a way to
handle a mismatch of byte-range locking management.
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED indicates that the server will
preserve the open file if the client (or any other client)
removes the file as long as it is open. Furthermore, the
server promises to preserve the file through the
grace period after server restart, thereby giving the client
the opportunity to reclaim its open.
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_RESULT_MAY_NOTIFY_LOCK indicates that the server may attempt
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK callbacks for locks on this file. This flag is a hint
only, and may be safely ignored by the client.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the component is of zero length, NFS4ERR_INVAL will be returned.
The component is also subject to the normal UTF-8, character support,
and name checks. See <xref target="utf8_related_errors" format="default"/> for
further discussion.
</t>
<t>
When an OPEN is done and the specified open-owner already has the
resulting filehandle open, the result is to "OR" together the new
share and deny status together with the existing status. In this
case, only a single CLOSE need be done, even though multiple OPENs
were completed. When such an OPEN is done, checking of share
reservations for the new OPEN proceeds normally, with no exception for
the existing OPEN held by the same open-owner. In this case, the
stateid returned as an "other" field that matches that of the previous
open while the "seqid" field is incremented to reflect the change
status due to the new open.
</t>
<t>
If the underlying file system at the server is only accessible in a
read-only mode and the OPEN request has specified ACCESS_WRITE or
ACCESS_BOTH, the server will return NFS4ERR_ROFS to indicate a
read-only file system.
</t>
<t>
As with the CREATE operation, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> derive
the owner, owner ACE, group, or group ACE if any
of the four attributes are required and supported
by the server's file system. For an OPEN with the
EXCLUSIVE4 createmode, the server has no choice,
since such OPEN calls do not include the createattrs
field. Conversely, if createattrs (UNCHECKED4 or
GUARDED4) or cva_attrs (EXCLUSIVE4_1) is specified,
and includes an owner, owner_group, or ACE that
the principal in the RPC call's credentials does
not have authorization to create files for, then
the server may return NFS4ERR_PERM.
</t>
<t>
In the case of an OPEN that specifies a size of zero (e.g., truncation)
and the file has named attributes, the named attributes are left as
is and are not removed.
</t>
<t>
NFSv4.1 gives more precise control to clients over
acquisition of delegations via the following new
flags for the share_access field of OPEN4args:
</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_READ_DELEG</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_WRITE_DELEG</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_ANY_DELEG</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_NO_DELEG</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_CANCEL</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED</t>
<t>
If (share_access &amp; OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_DELEG_MASK) is
not zero, then the client will have specified one and only one of:
</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_READ_DELEG</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_WRITE_DELEG</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_ANY_DELEG</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_NO_DELEG</t>
<t>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_CANCEL</t>
<t>
Otherwise, the client is neither indicating a desire nor a non-desire
for a delegation, and the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> or
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> not return a delegation
in the OPEN response.
</t>
<t>
If the server supports the new _WANT_ flags and the
client sends one or more of the new flags,
then in the event the server does not return a
delegation, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return a delegation type of
OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT. The field ond_why in the reply
indicates why
no delegation was returned and will be one of:
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>WND4_NOT_WANTED</dt>
<dd>
The client specified OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_NO_DELEG.
</dd>
<dt>WND4_CONTENTION</dt>
<dd>
There is a conflicting delegation or open on the file.
</dd>
<dt>WND4_RESOURCE</dt>
<dd>
Resource limitations prevent the server from granting a
delegation.
</dd>
<dt>WND4_NOT_SUPP_FTYPE</dt>
<dd>
The server does not support delegations on this file type.
</dd>
<dt>WND4_WRITE_DELEG_NOT_SUPP_FTYPE</dt>
<dd>
The server does not support OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegations on this file
type.
</dd>
<dt>WND4_NOT_SUPP_UPGRADE</dt>
<dd>
The server does not support atomic upgrade of an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation to an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation.
</dd>
<dt>WND4_NOT_SUPP_DOWNGRADE</dt>
<dd>
The server does not support atomic downgrade of an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation to an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation.
</dd>
<dt>WND4_CANCELED</dt>
<dd>
The client specified OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_CANCEL and now
any "want" for this file object is cancelled.
</dd>
<dt>WND4_IS_DIR</dt>
<dd>
The specified file object is a directory, and the operation
is OPEN or WANT_DELEGATION, which do not support delegations
on directories.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_READ_DELEG,
OPEN_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_WRITE_DELEG, or
OPEN_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_ANY_DELEG mean, respectively, the
client wants an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ, OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE, or any delegation regardless which
of OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ, OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, or
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH is set. If the client has an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation on a file and requests an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, then
the client is requesting atomic upgrade of its OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation
to an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation. If the client has an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation on
a file and requests an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation, then the client is
requesting atomic downgrade to an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation. A server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
support atomic upgrade or downgrade. If it does, then the
returned delegation_type of OPEN_DELEGATE_READ
or OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE that is different from the delegation
type the client currently has, indicates successful upgrade
or downgrade. If the server does not support atomic delegation upgrade or
downgrade, then ond_why will be set to WND4_NOT_SUPP_UPGRADE or
WND4_NOT_SUPP_DOWNGRADE.
</t>
<t>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_NO_DELEG means that the client wants no
delegation.
</t>
<t>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_CANCEL means that the client wants no
delegation and wants to cancel any previously registered
"want" for a delegation.
</t>
<t>
The client may set one or both of
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL and
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED.
However, they will have no effect unless one of following is set:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_READ_DELEG</li>
<li>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_WRITE_DELEG</li>
<li>OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_ANY_DELEG</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the client specifies
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL, then it
wishes to register a "want" for a delegation, in the event the
OPEN results do not include a delegation. If so and the
server denies the delegation due to insufficient resources,
the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> later inform the client, via the
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL operation, that the resource
limitation condition has eased. The server will tell the
client that it intends to send a future
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL operation by setting delegation_type
in the results to OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT, ond_why
to WND4_RESOURCE, and ond_server_will_signal_avail set to
TRUE. If
ond_server_will_signal_avail is set to TRUE, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
later send a CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL operation.
</t>
<t>
If the client specifies
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED, then it
wishes to register a "want" for a delegation, in the event the
OPEN results do not include a delegation. If so and the server
denies the delegation due to contention, the
server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> later inform the client, via the CB_PUSH_DELEG
operation, that the contention condition
has eased. The server will tell the client that it intends to
send a future CB_PUSH_DELEG operation by setting
delegation_type in the results to OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT,
ond_why to WND4_CONTENTION, and
ond_server_will_push_deleg to TRUE. If
ond_server_will_push_deleg is TRUE, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> later
send a CB_PUSH_DELEG operation.
</t>
<t>
If the client has previously registered a want for a
delegation on a file, and then sends a request to register a
want for a delegation on the same file, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
a new error: NFS4ERR_DELEG_ALREADY_WANTED. If the client
wishes to register a different type of delegation want for the
same file, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> cancel the existing delegation WANT.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPEN_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
In absence of a persistent session, the client
invokes exclusive create by setting the how parameter
to EXCLUSIVE4 or EXCLUSIVE4_1. In these cases, the
client provides a verifier that can reasonably be
expected to be unique. A combination of a client
identifier, perhaps the client network address,
and a unique number generated by the client, perhaps
the RPC transaction identifier, may be appropriate.
</t>
<t>
If the object does not exist, the server creates the object and stores the
verifier in stable storage. For file systems that do not provide a
mechanism for the storage of arbitrary file attributes, the server may
use one or more elements of the object's metadata to store the
verifier. The verifier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be stored in stable storage to prevent
erroneous failure on retransmission of the request. It is assumed that
an exclusive create is being performed because exclusive semantics are
critical to the application. Because of the expected usage, exclusive
CREATE does not rely solely on the server's reply cache
for storage of the verifier. A nonpersistent reply cache
does not survive a crash and the session and reply cache
may be deleted after a network partition that exceeds the
lease time, thus opening failure windows.
</t>
<t>
An NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> store the verifier in
any of the file's <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> or <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> attributes.
If it does, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> use time_modify_set or
time_access_set to store the verifier.
The server <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> store the verifier in the
following attributes:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>acl (it is desirable for access control to
be established at creation),</li>
<li>dacl (ditto),</li>
<li>mode (ditto),</li>
<li>owner (ditto),</li>
<li>owner_group (ditto),</li>
<li>retentevt_set (it may be desired to
establish retention at creation)</li>
<li>retention_hold (ditto),</li>
<li>retention_set (ditto),</li>
<li>sacl (it is desirable for auditing control
to be established at creation),</li>
<li>size (on some servers, size may have a
limited range of values),</li>
<li>
<t>mode_set_masked (as with mode),
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>and</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>time_creation (a meaningful file creation
should be set when the file is created).</li>
</ul>
<t>
Another alternative for the server is to use a named attribute
to store the verifier.
</t>
<t>
Because the EXCLUSIVE4 create method does not specify
initial attributes when processing an EXCLUSIVE4 create,
the server
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> set the
owner of the file to that corresponding to the credential of
request's RPC header.
</li>
<li>
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> leave the file's access control to anyone
but the owner of the file.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the server cannot support exclusive create
semantics, possibly because of the requirement to
commit the verifier to stable storage, it should fail
the OPEN request with the error NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP.
</t>
<t>
During an exclusive CREATE request, if the object
already exists, the server reconstructs the object's
verifier and compares it with the verifier in
the request. If they match, the server treats the
request as a success. The request is presumed to
be a duplicate of an earlier, successful request
for which the reply was lost and that the server
duplicate request cache mechanism did not detect. If
the verifiers do not match, the request is rejected
with the status NFS4ERR_EXIST.
</t>
<t>
After the client has performed a successful
exclusive create, the attrset response indicates
which attributes were used to store the verifier.
If EXCLUSIVE4 was used, the attributes set in
attrset were used for the verifier. If EXCLUSIVE4_1
was used, the client determines the attributes
used for the verifier by comparing attrset with
cva_attrs.attrmask; any bits set in the former but
not the latter identify the attributes used to store
the verifier. The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> immediately send a
SETATTR to set attributes used to store the verifier.
Until it does so, the attributes used to store the
verifier cannot be relied upon. The subsequent
SETATTR <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> occur in the same COMPOUND request
as the OPEN.
</t>
<t>
Unless a persistent session is used, use of the
GUARDED4 attribute does not provide exactly once
semantics. In particular, if a reply is lost and
the server does not detect the retransmission of the
request, the operation can fail with NFS4ERR_EXIST,
even though the create was performed successfully.
The client would use this behavior in the case that
the application has not requested an exclusive create
but has asked to have the file truncated when the
file is opened. In the case of the client timing
out and retransmitting the create request, the client
can use GUARDED4 to prevent against a sequence like
create, write, create (retransmitted) from occurring.
</t>
<t>
For SHARE reservations, the value of the expression
(share_access &amp; ~OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_DELEG_MASK) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
one of OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ, OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE,
or OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH. If not, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_INVAL. The value of share_deny <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be one of OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE, OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ,
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE, or OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH. If not, the
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
<t>
Based on the share_access value (OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ,
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, or OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH), the client
should check that the requester has the proper access rights
to perform the specified operation. This would generally be
the results of applying the ACL access rules to the file for the
current requester. However, just as with the ACCESS operation, the
client should not attempt to second-guess the server's decisions, as
access rights may change and may be subject to server administrative
controls outside the ACL framework. If the requester's READ or
WRITE operation is not authorized (depending on the share_access
value), the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_ACCESS.
</t>
<t>
Note that if the client ID was not created
with the EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID capability set in
the reply to EXCHANGE_ID, then the server <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> impose any requirement that READs and WRITEs
sent for an open file have the same credentials
as the OPEN itself, and the server is <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> to
perform access checking on the READs and WRITEs
themselves. Otherwise, if the reply to EXCHANGE_ID
did have EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID set,
then with one exception, the credentials used in the OPEN request <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
match those used in the READs and WRITEs, and the
stateids in the READs and WRITEs <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> match, or be
derived from the stateid from the reply to OPEN.
The exception is if SP4_SSV or SP4_MACH_CRED state
protection is used, and the spo_must_allow
result of EXCHANGE_ID includes the READ and/or WRITE
operations. In that case, the machine or SSV
credential will be allowed to send READ and/or WRITE.
See <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
If the component provided to OPEN is a symbolic link, the error
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK will be returned to the client, while if it is
a directory the error NFS4ERR_ISDIR will be returned.
If the component is neither
of those but not an ordinary file, the error NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE
is returned. If the current
filehandle is not a directory, the error NFS4ERR_NOTDIR will be
returned.
</t>
<t>
The use of the OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED result flag allows
a client to avoid the common implementation practice of renaming
an open file to ".nfs&lt;unique value&gt;" after it removes the file.
After the server returns OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED, if a client
sends a REMOVE operation that would reduce the file's link count to
zero, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> report a value
of zero for the numlinks attribute on the file.
</t>
<t>
If another client has a delegation of the file being opened that
conflicts with open being done (sometimes depending on the
share_access or share_deny value specified),
the delegation(s) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled, and the
operation cannot proceed until each such delegation is returned
or revoked. Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while delegation remains outstanding.
In the case of an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, any open by a different client
will conflict, while for an OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegation, only opens with one
of the following characteristics will be considered conflicting:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The value of share_access includes the bit
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE.
</li>
<li>
The value of share_deny specifies OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ or
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH.
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_CREATE is specified together with UNCHECKED4, the
size attribute is specified as zero (for truncation), and
an existing file is truncated.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If OPEN4_CREATE is specified and the file does not exist and
the current filehandle designates a directory for which another
client holds a directory delegation, then, unless the delegation
is such that the situation can be resolved by sending a notification,
the delegation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled, and the operation cannot proceed
until the delegation is returned or revoked. Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while delegation remains outstanding.
</t>
<t>
If OPEN4_CREATE is specified and the file does not exist and
the current filehandle designates a directory for which
one or more directory delegations exist, then, when those delegations
request such notifications, NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY will be generated
as a result of this operation.
</t>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="open_getfh_issue" numbered="true">
<name>Warning to Client Implementors</name>
<t>
OPEN resembles LOOKUP in that it generates a filehandle for the client
to use. Unlike LOOKUP though, OPEN creates server state on the
filehandle. In normal circumstances, the client can only release this
state with a CLOSE operation. CLOSE uses the current filehandle to
determine which file to close. Therefore, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> follow every
OPEN operation with a GETFH operation in the same COMPOUND procedure.
This will supply the client with the filehandle such that CLOSE can be
used appropriately.
</t>
<t>
Simply waiting for the lease on the file to expire is insufficient
because the server may maintain the state indefinitely as long as
another client does not attempt to make a conflicting access to the
same file.
</t>
<t>
See also <xref target="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_OPENATTR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 19: OPENATTR - Open Named Attribute Directory</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPENATTR_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct OPENATTR4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: object */
bool createdir;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPENATTR_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct OPENATTR4res {
/*
* If status is NFS4_OK,
* new CURRENT_FH: named attribute
* directory
*/
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPENATTR_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The OPENATTR operation is used to obtain the filehandle of the named
attribute directory associated with the current filehandle. The
result of the OPENATTR will be a filehandle to an object of type
NF4ATTRDIR. From this filehandle, READDIR and LOOKUP operations can
be used to obtain filehandles for the various named attributes
associated with the original file system object. Filehandles returned
within the named attribute directory will designate objects of
type of NF4NAMEDATTR.
</t>
<t>
The createdir argument allows the client to signify if a named
attribute directory should be created as a result of the OPENATTR
operation. Some clients may use the OPENATTR operation with a value
of FALSE for createdir to determine if any named attributes exist for
the object. If none exist, then NFS4ERR_NOENT will be returned. If
createdir has a value of TRUE and no named attribute directory exists,
one is created and its filehandle becomes the current filehandle.
On the other hand, if createdir has a value of TRUE and the named
attribute directory already exists, no error results and the filehandle
of the existing directory becomes the current filehandle. The
creation of a named attribute directory assumes
that the server has implemented named attribute support in this
fashion and is not required to do so by this definition.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle designates an object of type
NF4NAMEDATTR (a named attribute) or NF4ATTRDIR (a named attribute
directory), an error of NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE is returned to the
client. Named attributes or a named attribute directory <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
have their own named attributes.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPENATTR_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the server does not support named attributes for the current
filehandle, an error of NFS4ERR_NOTSUPP will be returned to the
client.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 21: OPEN_DOWNGRADE - Reduce Open File Access</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct OPEN_DOWNGRADE4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: opened file */
stateid4 open_stateid;
seqid4 seqid;
uint32_t share_access;
uint32_t share_deny;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct OPEN_DOWNGRADE4resok {
stateid4 open_stateid;
};
union OPEN_DOWNGRADE4res switch(nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
OPEN_DOWNGRADE4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation is used to adjust the access and deny states
for a given open. This is necessary when a given open-owner opens the
same file multiple times with different access and deny
values. In this situation, a close of one of the opens may change the
appropriate share_access and share_deny flags to remove bits
associated with opens no longer in effect.
</t>
<t>
Valid values for the expression (share_access &amp;
~OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_DELEG_MASK) are OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ,
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE, or OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH. If the client
specifies other values, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reply with NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
<t>
Valid values for the share_deny field are
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_NONE, OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_READ,
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE, or OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH. If
the client specifies other values, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
reply with NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
<t>
After checking for valid values of share_access and
share_deny, the server replaces the current access
and deny modes on the file with share_access and
share_deny subject to the following constraints:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The bits in share_access <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> equal the union of the share_access
bits (not including OPEN4_SHARE_WANT_* bits)
specified for some subset of the OPENs
in effect for the current open-owner on the current
file.
</li>
<li>
The bits in share_deny <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> equal the union of the
share_deny bits specified for some subset
of the OPENs in effect for the current open-owner
on the current file.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the above constraints are not respected,
the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return the error NFS4ERR_INVAL.
Since share_access and share_deny bits should be
subsets of those already granted, short of a defect
in the client or server implementation, it is not
possible for the OPEN_DOWNGRADE request to be denied
because of conflicting share reservations.
</t>
<t>
The seqid argument is not used in NFSv4.1, <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be any value, and
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the server.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_OPEN_DOWNGRADE_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
An OPEN_DOWNGRADE operation may make OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegations grantable
where they were not previously. Servers may choose to respond
immediately if there are pending delegation want requests or may
respond to the situation at a later time.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_PUTFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 22: PUTFH - Set Current Filehandle</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTFH_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct PUTFH4args {
nfs_fh4 object;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTFH_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct PUTFH4res {
/*
* If status is NFS4_OK,
* new CURRENT_FH: argument to PUTFH
*/
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTFH_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation replaces the current filehandle with the filehandle provided as an
argument. It clears the current stateid.
</t>
<t>
If the security mechanism used by the requester does not meet the
requirements of the filehandle provided to this operation, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_filehandle" format="default"/> for more details on the
current filehandle.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/> for more details on the current
stateid.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTFH_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
This operation is used
in an NFS request to set the context for file accessing operations that
follow in the same COMPOUND request.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_PUTPUBFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 23: PUTPUBFH - Set Public Filehandle</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTPUBFH_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
void;
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTPUBFH_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct PUTPUBFH4res {
/*
* If status is NFS4_OK,
* new CURRENT_FH: public fh
*/
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTPUBFH_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation replaces the current filehandle with the filehandle that
represents the public filehandle of the server's namespace.
This filehandle may be different from the "root" filehandle
that may be associated with some other directory on the server.
</t>
<t>
PUTPUBFH also clears the current stateid.
</t>
<t>
The public filehandle represents the concepts embodied in <xref target="RFC2054" format="default">RFC 2054</xref>, <xref target="RFC2055" format="default">RFC 2055</xref>, and <xref target="RFC2224" format="default">RFC 2224</xref>. The intent for NFSv4.1
is that the public filehandle (represented by the PUTPUBFH
operation) be used as a method of providing WebNFS server
compatibility with NFSv3.
</t>
<t>
The public filehandle and the root filehandle (represented by the
PUTROOTFH operation) <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be equivalent. If the public and root
filehandles are not equivalent, then the directory corresponding to the public filehandle <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a
descendant of the directory corresponding to the root filehandle.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_filehandle" format="default"/> for more details on the
current filehandle.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/> for more details on the current
stateid.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTPUBFH_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
This operation is used
in an NFS request to set the context for file accessing operations that
follow in the same COMPOUND request.
</t>
<t>
With the NFSv3 public filehandle, the client is
able to specify whether the pathname provided in the LOOKUP
should be evaluated as either an absolute path relative to the
server's root or relative to the public filehandle. <xref target="RFC2224" format="default">RFC 2224</xref> contains further discussion of
the functionality. With NFSv4.1, that type of
specification is not directly available in the LOOKUP operation.
The reason for this is because the component separators needed
to specify absolute vs. relative are not allowed in NFSv4. Therefore, the client is responsible for constructing its
request such that the use of either PUTROOTFH or PUTPUBFH
signifies absolute or relative evaluation of an NFS URL,
respectively.
</t>
<t>
Note that there are warnings mentioned in <xref target="RFC2224" format="default">RFC 2224</xref> with respect to the use of
absolute evaluation and the restrictions the server may place on
that evaluation with respect to how much of its namespace has
been made available. These same warnings apply to NFSv4.1. It is likely, therefore, that because of server
implementation details, an NFSv3 absolute public
filehandle look up may behave differently than an NFSv4.1
absolute resolution.
</t>
<t>
There is a form of security negotiation as described
in <xref target="RFC2755" format="default">RFC 2755</xref> that uses
the public filehandle and an overloading of the pathname.
This method is not available with NFSv4.1 as
filehandles are not overloaded with special
meaning and therefore do not provide the same
framework as NFSv3. Clients should therefore use
the security negotiation mechanisms described in
<xref target="Security_Service_Negotiation" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_PUTROOTFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 24: PUTROOTFH - Set Root Filehandle</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTROOTFH_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTROOTFH_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct PUTROOTFH4res {
/*
* If status is NFS4_OK,
* new CURRENT_FH: root fh
*/
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTROOTFH_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation replaces the current filehandle with the filehandle that represents
the root of the server's namespace. From this filehandle, a LOOKUP
operation can locate any other filehandle on the server. This
filehandle may be different from the "public" filehandle that may be
associated with some other directory on the server.
</t>
<t>
PUTROOTFH also clears the current stateid.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_filehandle" format="default"/> for more details on the
current filehandle.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/> for more details on the current
stateid.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_PUTROOTFH_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
This operation is used
in an NFS request to set the context for file accessing operations that
follow in the same COMPOUND request.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_READ" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 25: READ - Read from File</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READ_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct READ4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
stateid4 stateid;
offset4 offset;
count4 count;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READ_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct READ4resok {
bool eof;
opaque data<>;
};
union READ4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
READ4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READ_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The READ operation reads data from the regular file identified by the
current filehandle.
</t>
<t>
The client provides an offset of where the READ is to start and a
count of how many bytes are to be read. An offset of zero means
to read data starting at the beginning of the file. If offset is
greater than or equal to the size of the file, the status NFS4_OK is
returned with a data length set to zero and eof is set to TRUE.
The READ is subject to access permissions checking.
</t>
<t>
If the client specifies a count value of zero, the READ succeeds
and returns zero bytes of data again subject to access permissions
checking. The server may choose to return fewer bytes than specified
by the client. The client needs to check for this condition and
handle the condition appropriately.
</t>
<t>
Except when special stateids are used, the
stateid value for a READ request represents a value returned from
a previous byte-range lock or share reservation request or the stateid
associated with a delegation. The stateid identifies the associated
owners if any and is
used by the server to verify that the associated locks are still
valid (e.g., have not been revoked).
</t>
<t>
If the read ended at the end-of-file (formally, in a correctly formed
READ operation, if offset + count is equal to the size of the file), or
the READ operation extends beyond the size of the file (if offset +
count is greater than the size of the file), eof is returned as TRUE;
otherwise, it is FALSE. A successful READ of an empty file will always
return eof as TRUE.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle is not an ordinary file, an error will be
returned to the client. In the case that the current filehandle
represents an object of type NF4DIR, NFS4ERR_ISDIR is returned.
If the current filehandle designates a symbolic link,
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK is returned. In all other cases,
NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE is returned.
</t>
<t>
For a READ with a stateid value of all bits equal to zero, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> allow
the READ to be serviced subject to mandatory byte-range locks or the current
share deny modes for the file. For a READ with a stateid value of all
bits equal to one, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> allow READ operations to bypass locking checks
at the server.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READ_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the server returns a "short read" (i.e., fewer data than requested and eof is set to FALSE), the client should send another READ to get the
remaining data. A server may return less data than requested under
several circumstances. The file may have been truncated by another
client or perhaps on the server itself, changing the file size from
what the requesting client believes to be the case. This would reduce
the actual amount of data available to the client. It is possible
that the server reduce the transfer size and so return a short
read result. Server resource exhaustion may also occur in a
short read.
</t>
<t>
If mandatory byte-range locking is in effect for the file, and if the byte-range
corresponding to the data to be read from the file is WRITE_LT locked by an
owner not associated with the stateid, the server will return the
NFS4ERR_LOCKED error. The client should try to get the appropriate
READ_LT via the LOCK operation before re-attempting the
READ. When the READ completes, the client should release the byte-range
lock via LOCKU.
</t>
<t>
If another client has an OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation for the file being read,
the delegation must be recalled, and the
operation cannot proceed until that delegation is returned
or revoked. Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while the delegation remains outstanding.
Normally, delegations will not be recalled as a result of a READ
operation since the recall will occur as a result of an earlier
OPEN. However, since it is possible for a READ to be done with
a special stateid, the server needs to check for this case even
though the client should have done an OPEN previously.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_READDIR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 26: READDIR - Read Directory</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READDIR_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct READDIR4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: directory */
nfs_cookie4 cookie;
verifier4 cookieverf;
count4 dircount;
count4 maxcount;
bitmap4 attr_request;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READDIR_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct entry4 {
nfs_cookie4 cookie;
component4 name;
fattr4 attrs;
entry4 *nextentry;
};
struct dirlist4 {
entry4 *entries;
bool eof;
};
struct READDIR4resok {
verifier4 cookieverf;
dirlist4 reply;
};
union READDIR4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
READDIR4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READDIR_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The READDIR operation retrieves a variable number of entries from a
file system directory and returns client-requested attributes for each
entry along with information to allow the client to request additional
directory entries in a subsequent READDIR.
</t>
<t>
The arguments contain a cookie value that represents where the READDIR
should start within the directory. A value of zero for the cookie
is used to start reading at the beginning of the directory. For
subsequent READDIR requests, the client specifies a cookie value that
is provided by the server on a previous READDIR request.
</t>
<t>
The request's cookieverf field should be set to 0
zero) when the request's cookie field is zero
(first read of the directory). On subsequent requests, the
cookieverf field must match the cookieverf returned
by the READDIR in which the cookie was acquired.
If the server determines that the cookieverf
is no longer valid for the directory, the error
NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME must be returned.
</t>
<t>
The dircount field of the request is a hint of the maximum number
of bytes of directory information that should be returned. This value
represents the total length of the names of the directory entries and the
cookie value for these entries. This length represents the XDR
encoding of the data (names and cookies) and not the length in the
native format of the server.
</t>
<t>
The maxcount field of the request represents the maximum
total size of all of the data being returned within
the READDIR4resok structure and includes the XDR
overhead. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return less data. If the
server is unable to return a single directory entry
within the maxcount limit, the error NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned to the client.
</t>
<t>
Finally, the request's attr_request field represents
the list of attributes to be returned for each
directory entry supplied by the server.
</t>
<t>
A successful reply consists of a list of
directory entries. Each of these entries contains the name of the
directory entry, a cookie value for that entry, and the associated
attributes as requested. The "eof" flag has a value of TRUE if there
are no more entries in the directory.
</t>
<t>
The cookie value is only meaningful to the server and is used
as a cursor for the directory entry. As mentioned, this cookie
is used by the client for subsequent READDIR operations so that it may
continue reading a directory. The cookie is similar in concept to a
READ offset but <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be interpreted as such by the client.
Ideally, the cookie value <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> change if the directory is
modified since the client may be caching these values.
</t>
<t>
In some cases, the server may encounter an error while obtaining the
attributes for a directory entry. Instead of returning an error for
the entire READDIR operation, the server can instead return the
attribute rdattr_error (<xref target="attrdef_rdattr_error" format="default"/>). With this, the server is able to
communicate the failure to the client and not fail the entire
operation in the instance of what might be a transient failure.
Obviously, the client must request the fattr4_rdattr_error attribute
for this method to work properly. If the client does not request the
attribute, the server has no choice but to return failure for the
entire READDIR operation.
</t>
<t>
For some file system environments, the directory entries "." and ".."
have special meaning, and in other environments, they do not. If the
server supports these special entries within a directory, they <bcp14>SHOULD
NOT</bcp14> be returned to the client as part of the READDIR response. To
enable some client environments, the cookie values of zero, 1, and 2 are
to be considered reserved. Note that the UNIX client will use these
values when combining the server's response and local representations
to enable a fully formed UNIX directory presentation to the
application.
</t>
<t>
For READDIR arguments, cookie values of one and two <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be used, and
for READDIR results, cookie values of zero, one, and two <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be
returned.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READDIR_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The server's file system directory representations
can differ greatly. A client's programming
interfaces may also be bound to the local operating
environment in a way that does not translate well
into the NFS protocol. Therefore, the use of the
dircount and maxcount fields are provided to enable
the client to provide hints to the server. If the
client is aggressive about attribute collection
during a READDIR, the server has an idea of how to
limit the encoded response.
</t>
<t>
If dircount is zero, the server bounds the reply's
size based on the request's maxcount field.
</t>
<t>
The cookieverf may be used by the server to help manage cookie values
that may become stale. It should be a rare occurrence that a server is
unable to continue properly reading a directory with the provided
cookie/cookieverf pair. The server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> make every effort to avoid
this condition since the application at the client might be unable to
properly handle this type of failure.
</t>
<t>
The use of the cookieverf will also protect the client from using
READDIR cookie values that might be stale. For example, if the file
system has been migrated, the server might or might not be able to use the
same cookie values to service READDIR as the previous server used.
With the client providing the cookieverf, the server is able to
provide the appropriate response to the client. This prevents the
case where the server accepts a cookie value but the underlying
directory has changed and the response is invalid from the client's
context of its previous READDIR.
</t>
<t>
Since some servers will not be returning "." and ".." entries as has
been done with previous versions of the NFS protocol, the client that
requires these entries be present in READDIR responses must fabricate
them.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_READLINK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 27: READLINK - Read Symbolic Link</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READLINK_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* CURRENT_FH: symlink */
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READLINK_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct READLINK4resok {
linktext4 link;
};
union READLINK4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
READLINK4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READLINK_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
READLINK reads the data associated with a symbolic
link. Depending on the value of the UTF-8 capability
attribute (<xref target="utf8_caps" format="default"/>), the data is encoded
in UTF-8.
Whether created by an NFS client or created locally
on the server, the data in a symbolic link is not
interpreted (except possibly to check for proper UTF-8
encoding) when created, but is simply stored.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_READLINK_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
A symbolic link is nominally a pointer to another file. The data is
not necessarily interpreted by the server, just stored in the file.
It is possible for a client implementation to store a pathname that
is not meaningful to the server operating system in a symbolic link.
A READLINK operation returns the data to the client for
interpretation. If different implementations want to share access to
symbolic links, then they must agree on the interpretation of the data
in the symbolic link.
</t>
<t>
The READLINK operation is only allowed on objects of type NF4LNK.
The server should return the error NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE if the
object is not of type NF4LNK.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_REMOVE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 28: REMOVE - Remove File System Object</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_REMOVE_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct REMOVE4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: directory */
component4 target;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_REMOVE_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct REMOVE4resok {
change_info4 cinfo;
};
union REMOVE4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
REMOVE4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_REMOVE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The REMOVE operation removes (deletes) a directory entry named by
filename from the directory corresponding to the current filehandle.
If the entry in the directory was the last reference to the
corresponding file system object, the object may be destroyed.
The directory may be either of type NF4DIR or NF4ATTRDIR.
</t>
<t>
For the directory where the filename was removed, the server
returns change_info4 information in cinfo. With the atomic field of
the change_info4 data type, the server will indicate if the before and
after change attributes were obtained atomically with respect to the
removal.
</t>
<t>
If the target has a length of zero, or if
the target does not obey the UTF-8 definition (and
the server is enforcing UTF-8 encoding; see <xref target="utf8_caps" format="default"/>), the error NFS4ERR_INVAL will
be returned.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_REMOVE_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
NFSv3 required a different operator RMDIR for directory
removal and REMOVE for non-directory removal. This allowed clients to
skip checking the file type when being passed a non-directory delete
system call (e.g., <xref target="unlink" format="default">unlink()</xref> in POSIX) to remove a directory, as well as
the converse (e.g., a rmdir() on a non-directory) because they knew the
server would check the file type. NFSv4.1 REMOVE can be used to
delete any directory entry independent of its file type. The
implementor of an NFSv4.1 client's entry points from the
unlink() and rmdir() system calls should first check the file type
against the types the system call is allowed to remove before sending
a REMOVE operation. Alternatively, the implementor can produce a COMPOUND call
that includes a LOOKUP/VERIFY sequence of operations to verify the file type before
a REMOVE operation in the same COMPOUND call.
</t>
<t>
The concept of last reference is server
specific. However, if the numlinks field in the
previous attributes of the object had the value 1,
the client should not rely on referring to the
object via a filehandle. Likewise, the client
should not rely on the resources (disk space,
directory entry, and so on) formerly associated
with the object becoming immediately available.
Thus, if a client needs to be able to continue to
access a file after using REMOVE to remove it, the
client should take steps to make sure that the file
will still be accessible. While the traditional
mechanism used is to RENAME the file from its old
name to a new hidden name, the NFSv4.1 OPEN operation
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return a result flag, OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED,
which indicates to the client that the file will be
preserved if the file has an outstanding open (see <xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
If the server finds that the file is still open when the REMOVE
arrives:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The server <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> delete the file's directory entry if the
file was opened with OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE or
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH.
</li>
<li>
If the file was not opened with OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE or
OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_BOTH, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> delete the file's
directory entry. However, until last CLOSE of the file,
the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> continue to allow access to the file via
its filehandle.
</li>
<li>
The server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> delete the directory
entry if the reply from OPEN had the flag
OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED set.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> implement its own restrictions on removal
of a file while it is open. The server might disallow
such a REMOVE (or a removal that occurs
as part of RENAME). The conditions that influence the restrictions
on removal of a file while it is still open include:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Whether certain access protocols (i.e., not just
NFS) are holding the file open.
</li>
<li>
Whether particular options, access modes, or policies on the
server are enabled.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If a file has an outstanding OPEN and this prevents the
removal of the file's directory entry,
the error NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN is returned.
</t>
<t>
Where the determination above cannot be made
definitively because delegations are being held,
they <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled to allow processing of the
REMOVE to continue. When a delegation is held,
the server has no reliable knowledge of the status of OPENs for
that client, so unless
there are files opened with the particular deny modes
by clients without delegations, the determination
cannot be made until delegations are recalled, and
the operation cannot proceed until each sufficient
delegation has been returned or revoked to allow
the server to make a correct determination.
</t>
<t>
In all cases in which delegations are recalled, the server
is likely to return one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors while
delegations remain outstanding.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle designates a directory for
which another client holds a directory delegation,
then, unless the situation can be resolved by sending
a notification, the directory delegation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
recalled, and the operation <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> proceed until
the delegation is returned or revoked. Except where
this happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY
errors will be returned to requests made while
delegation remains outstanding.
</t>
<t>
When the current filehandle designates a directory
for which one or more directory delegations
exist, then, when those delegations request
such notifications, NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY will be
generated as a result of this operation.
</t>
<t>
Note that when a remove occurs as a result of a
RENAME, NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY will only be generated
if the removal happens as a separate operation.
In the case in which the removal is integrated and
atomic with RENAME, the notification of the removal
is integrated with notification for the RENAME. See
the discussion of the NOTIFY4_RENAME_ENTRY
notification in <xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_RENAME" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 29: RENAME - Rename Directory Entry</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RENAME_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct RENAME4args {
/* SAVED_FH: source directory */
component4 oldname;
/* CURRENT_FH: target directory */
component4 newname;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RENAME_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct RENAME4resok {
change_info4 source_cinfo;
change_info4 target_cinfo;
};
union RENAME4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
RENAME4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RENAME_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The RENAME operation renames the object identified by oldname in the
source directory corresponding to the saved filehandle, as set by the
SAVEFH operation, to newname in the target directory corresponding to
the current filehandle. The operation is required to be atomic to the
client. Source and target directories <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reside on the same
file system on the server. On success, the current filehandle will
continue to be the target directory.
</t>
<t>
If the target directory already contains an entry with the name
newname, the source object <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be compatible with the target: either
both are non-directories or both are directories and the target <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be empty.
If compatible, the existing target is removed before the
rename occurs or, preferably, the target is removed atomically as
part of the rename.
See <xref target="OP_REMOVE_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>
for client and server actions whenever a target is removed.
Note however that when the removal is performed atomically with the
rename, certain parts of the removal described there are integrated
with the rename. For example, notification of the removal will not
be via a NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY but will be indicated as part of the
NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY or NOTIFY4_RENAME_ENTRY generated by the rename.
</t>
<t>
If the source object and the target are not
compatible or if the target is a directory but not empty, the server
will return the error NFS4ERR_EXIST.
</t>
<t>
If oldname and newname both refer to the same
file (e.g., they might be hard links of each
other), then unless the file is open (see <xref target="OP_RENAME_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>), RENAME <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
perform no action and return NFS4_OK.
</t>
<t>
For both directories involved in the RENAME, the server returns
change_info4 information. With the atomic field of the change_info4
data type, the server will indicate if the before and after change
attributes were obtained atomically with respect to the rename.
</t>
<t>
If oldname refers to a named attribute and the saved and current
filehandles refer to different file system objects, the server will
return NFS4ERR_XDEV just as if the saved and current filehandles
represented directories on different file systems.
</t>
<t>
If oldname or newname has a length of zero, or if oldname or
newname does not obey the UTF-8 definition, the error NFS4ERR_INVAL
will be returned.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RENAME_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> impose restrictions on the RENAME
operation such that RENAME may not be done when the
file being renamed is open or when that open is done
by particular protocols, or with particular options
or access modes. Similar restrictions may be applied
when a file exists with the target name and is open.
When RENAME is rejected because of such restrictions,
the error NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN is returned.
</t>
<t>
When oldname and rename refer to the same file and
that file is open in a fashion such that RENAME
would normally be rejected with NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN
if oldname and newname were different files, then
RENAME <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be rejected with NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN.
</t>
<t>
If a server does implement such restrictions and those restrictions
include cases of NFSv4 opens preventing successful execution of
a rename, the server needs to recall any delegations that could
hide the existence of opens relevant to that decision. This is
because when a client holds a delegation, the server
might not have an accurate account of the opens for that client, since
the client may execute OPENs and CLOSEs locally. The RENAME operation
need only be delayed until a definitive result can be obtained. For
example, if there are multiple delegations and one of them establishes
an open whose presence would prevent the rename, given the server's
semantics, NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN may be returned to the caller as soon
as that delegation is returned without waiting for other delegations
to be returned. Similarly, if such opens are not associated with
delegations, NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN can be returned immediately with no
delegation recall being done.
</t>
<t>
If the current filehandle or the saved filehandle designates a
directory for which another client holds a directory delegation,
then, unless the situation can be resolved by sending a notification,
the delegation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled, and the operation cannot proceed
until the delegation is returned or revoked. Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while delegation remains outstanding.
</t>
<t>
When the current and saved filehandles are the
same and they designate a directory for which one
or more directory delegations exist, then, when
those delegations request such notifications,
a notification of type NOTIFY4_RENAME_ENTRY
will be generated as a result of this operation.
When oldname and rename refer to the same file,
no notification is generated (because, as <xref target="OP_RENAME_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/> states, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> take no action). When a file is removed
because it has the same name as the target, if
that removal is done atomically with the rename,
a NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY notification will not be
generated. Instead, the deletion of the file will
be reported as part of the NOTIFY4_RENAME_ENTRY
notification.
</t>
<t>
When the current and saved filehandles are not the same:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the current filehandle designates a directory for which
one or more directory delegations exist, then, when those
delegations request such notifications, NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY
will be generated as a result of this operation. When a file
is removed because it has the same name as the target, if that
removal is done atomically with the rename, a
NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY notification will not be generated.
Instead, the deletion of the file will be reported as part
of the NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY notification.
</li>
<li>
If the saved filehandle designates a directory for which
one or more directory delegations exist, then, when those
delegations request such notifications, NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY
will be generated as a result of this operation.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the object being renamed has file delegations
held by clients other than the one doing the RENAME,
the delegations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled, and the
operation cannot proceed
until each such delegation is returned
or revoked. Note that in the case of multiply linked files,
the delegation recall requirement applies even if the
delegation was obtained through a different name than the
one being renamed.
In all cases in which delegations are recalled, the server
is likely to return one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors while the
delegation(s) remains outstanding, although it might not do that if the
delegations are returned quickly.
</t>
<t>
The RENAME operation must be atomic to the client. The statement
"source and target directories <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reside on the same file system
on the server"
means that the fsid fields in the attributes for the
directories are the same. If they reside on different file systems,
the error NFS4ERR_XDEV is returned.
</t>
<t>
Based on the value of the fh_expire_type attribute for the object, the
filehandle may or may not expire on a RENAME. However, server
implementors are strongly encouraged to attempt to keep filehandles
from expiring in this fashion.
</t>
<t>
On some servers, the file names "." and ".." are illegal as either
oldname or newname, and will result in the error NFS4ERR_BADNAME.
In addition, on many servers the case of oldname or newname being
an alias for the source directory will be checked for. Such servers
will return the error NFS4ERR_INVAL in these cases.
</t>
<t>
If either of the source or target filehandles are not directories, the
server will return NFS4ERR_NOTDIR.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_RESTOREFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 31: RESTOREFH - Restore Saved Filehandle</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RESTOREFH_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* SAVED_FH: */
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RESTOREFH_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct RESTOREFH4res {
/*
* If status is NFS4_OK,
* new CURRENT_FH: value of saved fh
*/
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RESTOREFH_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The RESTOREFH operation sets the current filehandle and stateid to the values in the
saved filehandle and stateid. If
there is no saved filehandle, then the server will
return the error NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_filehandle" format="default"/> for more details on the
current filehandle.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/> for more details on the current
stateid.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RESTOREFH_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
Operations like OPEN and LOOKUP use the current filehandle
to represent a directory and replace it with a new filehandle.
Assuming that the previous filehandle was saved with a SAVEFH operator,
the previous filehandle can be restored as the current filehandle.
This is commonly used to obtain post-operation attributes for
the directory, e.g.,
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
PUTFH (directory filehandle)
SAVEFH
GETATTR attrbits (pre-op dir attrs)
CREATE optbits "foo" attrs
GETATTR attrbits (file attributes)
RESTOREFH
GETATTR attrbits (post-op dir attrs)]]></sourcecode>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_SAVEFH" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 32: SAVEFH - Save Current Filehandle</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SAVEFH_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* CURRENT_FH: */
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SAVEFH_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct SAVEFH4res {
/*
* If status is NFS4_OK,
* new SAVED_FH: value of current fh
*/
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SAVEFH_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The SAVEFH operation saves the current filehandle and stateid.
If a previous filehandle was saved, then
it is no longer accessible. The saved filehandle can be restored as
the current filehandle with the RESTOREFH operator.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_filehandle" format="default"/> for more details on the
current filehandle.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/> for more details on the current
stateid.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SAVEFH_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_SECINFO" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 33: SECINFO - Obtain Available Security</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SECINFO_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct SECINFO4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: directory */
component4 name;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SECINFO_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* From RFC 2203
*/
enum rpc_gss_svc_t {
RPC_GSS_SVC_NONE = 1,
RPC_GSS_SVC_INTEGRITY = 2,
RPC_GSS_SVC_PRIVACY = 3
};
struct rpcsec_gss_info {
sec_oid4 oid;
qop4 qop;
rpc_gss_svc_t service;
};
/* RPCSEC_GSS has a value of '6' - See RFC 2203 */
union secinfo4 switch (uint32_t flavor) {
case RPCSEC_GSS:
rpcsec_gss_info flavor_info;
default:
void;
};
typedef secinfo4 SECINFO4resok<>;
union SECINFO4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
/* CURRENTFH: consumed */
SECINFO4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SECINFO_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The SECINFO operation is used by the client to obtain a list of
valid RPC authentication flavors for a specific directory
filehandle, file name pair. SECINFO should apply the same
access methodology used for LOOKUP when evaluating the name.
Therefore, if the requester does not have the appropriate access
to LOOKUP the name, then SECINFO <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> behave the same way and
return NFS4ERR_ACCESS.
</t>
<t>
The result will contain an array that represents the security
mechanisms available, with an order corresponding to the
server's preferences, the most preferred being first in the
array. The client is free to pick whatever security mechanism it
both desires and supports, or to pick in the server's preference
order the first one it supports. The array entries are
represented by the secinfo4 structure. The field 'flavor' will
contain a value of AUTH_NONE, AUTH_SYS (as defined in <xref target="RFC5531" format="default">RFC 5531</xref>), or RPCSEC_GSS (as defined in
<xref target="RFC2203" format="default">RFC 2203</xref>). The field flavor can
also be any other security flavor registered with IANA.
</t>
<t>
For the flavors AUTH_NONE and AUTH_SYS, no additional security
information is returned. The same is true of many (if not most)
other security flavors, including AUTH_DH. For a return value of
RPCSEC_GSS, a security triple is returned that contains the
mechanism object identifier (OID, as defined in <xref target="RFC2743" format="default">RFC 2743</xref>), the quality of protection (as
defined in <xref target="RFC2743" format="default">RFC 2743</xref>), and the
service type (as defined in <xref target="RFC2203" format="default">RFC 2203</xref>). It is possible for SECINFO to
return multiple entries with flavor equal to RPCSEC_GSS with
different security triple values.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle is consumed (see
<xref target="aftersecinfo" format="default"/>), and if the
next operation after SECINFO tries to use the current filehandle,
that operation will fail with the status NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE.
</t>
<t>
If the name has a length of zero, or if the name does not obey
the UTF-8 definition (assuming UTF-8 capabilities are enabled; see
<xref target="utf8_caps" format="default"/>), the error NFS4ERR_INVAL will be returned.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="Security_Service_Negotiation" format="default"/>
for additional information on the use of SECINFO.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SECINFO_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The SECINFO operation is expected to be used by the NFS client
when the error value of NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC is returned from
another NFS operation. This signifies to the client that the
server's security policy is different from what the client is
currently using. At this point, the client is expected to
obtain a list of possible security flavors and choose what best
suits its policies.
</t>
<t>
As mentioned, the server's security
policies will determine when a client
request receives NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. See <xref target="error_op_returns" format="default"/> for a list of operations
that can return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. In addition,
when READDIR returns attributes, the rdattr_error
(<xref target="attrdef_rdattr_error" format="default"/>)
can contain NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. Note that CREATE and
REMOVE <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. The
rationale for CREATE is that unless the
target name exists, it cannot have a separate
security policy from the parent directory,
and the security policy of the parent was
checked when its filehandle was injected into
the COMPOUND request's operations stream (for
similar reasons, an OPEN operation that creates
the target <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC). If
the target name exists, while it might have a
separate security policy, that is irrelevant
because CREATE <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_EXIST.
The rationale for REMOVE is that while that
target might have a separate security policy, the
target is going to be removed, and so the
security policy of the parent trumps that of the
object being removed. RENAME and LINK <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC, but the NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC error
applies only to the saved filehandle (see <xref target="link_rename" format="default"/>). Any NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
error on the current filehandle used by LINK and
RENAME <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned by the PUTFH, PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH, or RESTOREFH operation that injected
the current filehandle.
</t>
<t>
With the exception of LINK and RENAME,
the set of operations that can return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC
represents the point at which the client can inject a
filehandle into the "current filehandle" at the server. The
filehandle is either provided by the client (PUTFH, PUTPUBFH,
PUTROOTFH), generated as a result of a name-to-filehandle
translation (LOOKUP and OPEN), or generated from the saved filehandle
via RESTOREFH. As <xref target="PUTFHplusSAVEFH" format="default"/> states,
a put filehandle operation followed by SAVEFH <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC. Thus, the RESTOREFH operation, under
certain conditions (see <xref target="putfh_series" format="default"/>), is
permitted to return NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC so that security policies
can be honored.
</t>
<t>
The READDIR operation will not directly return the
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC error. However, if the READDIR request
included a request for attributes, it is possible that the
READDIR request's security triple did not match that of a
directory entry. If this is the case and the client has
requested the rdattr_error attribute, the server will return the
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC error in rdattr_error for the entry.
</t>
<t>
To resolve an error return of
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC, the client does the following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
For LOOKUP and OPEN, the client will use SECINFO with the
same current filehandle and name as provided in the
original LOOKUP or OPEN to enumerate the available security
triples.
</li>
<li>
For the rdattr_error, the client will use
SECINFO with the same current filehandle
as provided in the original READDIR. The
name passed to SECINFO will be that of the
directory entry (as returned from READDIR)
that had the NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC error in the
rdattr_error attribute.
</li>
<li>
<t>
For PUTFH, PUTROOTFH, PUTPUBFH,
RESTOREFH, LINK, and RENAME, the client will
use SECINFO_NO_NAME { style =
SECINFO_STYLE4_CURRENT_FH }. The client
will prefix the SECINFO_NO_NAME operation
with the appropriate PUTFH, PUTPUBFH,
or PUTROOTFH operation that provides the
filehandle originally provided by the PUTFH,
PUTPUBFH, PUTROOTFH, or RESTOREFH operation.
</t>
<t>
NOTE: In NFSv4.0, the client was required
to use SECINFO, and had to reconstruct the
parent of the original filehandle and the
component name of the original filehandle. The
introduction in NFSv4.1 of SECINFO_NO_NAME
obviates the need for reconstruction.
</t>
</li>
<li>
For LOOKUPP, the client will
use SECINFO_NO_NAME { style =
SECINFO_STYLE4_PARENT } and provide the
filehandle that equals the filehandle
originally provided to LOOKUPP.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
See <xref target="SECCON" format="default"/> for a discussion on
the recommendations for the security flavor used by SECINFO and
SECINFO_NO_NAME.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_SETATTR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 34: SETATTR - Set Attributes</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SETATTR_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct SETATTR4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: target object */
stateid4 stateid;
fattr4 obj_attributes;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SETATTR_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct SETATTR4res {
nfsstat4 status;
bitmap4 attrsset;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SETATTR_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The SETATTR operation changes one or more of the attributes of a
file system object. The new attributes are specified with a bitmap and
the attributes that follow the bitmap in bit order.
</t>
<t>
The stateid argument for SETATTR is used to provide byte-range locking
context that is necessary for SETATTR requests that set the size
attribute. Since setting the size attribute modifies the file's data,
it has the same locking requirements as a corresponding WRITE. Any
SETATTR that sets the size attribute is incompatible with a share
reservation that specifies OPEN4_SHARE_DENY_WRITE. The area between the old
end-of-file and the new end-of-file is considered to be modified just
as would have been the case had the area in question been specified as
the target of WRITE, for the purpose of checking conflicts with byte-range
locks, for those cases in which a server is implementing mandatory
byte-range locking behavior. A valid stateid <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> always be specified.
When the file size attribute is not set, the special stateid
consisting of all bits equal to zero <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be passed.
</t>
<t>
On either success or failure of the operation, the server will return
the attrsset bitmask to represent what (if any) attributes were
successfully set. The attrsset in the response is a subset of the
attrmask field of the obj_attributes field in the argument.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SETATTR_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the request specifies the owner attribute to be set, the server
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> allow the operation to succeed if the current owner of the
object matches the value specified in the request. Some servers may
be implemented in a way as to prohibit the setting of the owner
attribute unless the requester has privilege to do so. If the server
is lenient in this one case of matching owner values, the client
implementation may be simplified in cases of creation of an object
(e.g., an exclusive create via OPEN)
followed by a SETATTR.
</t>
<t>
The file size attribute is used to request changes
to the size of a file. A value of zero causes the
file to be truncated, a value less than the current
size of the file causes data from new size to the
end of the file to be discarded, and a size greater
than the current size of the file causes logically
zeroed data bytes to be added to the end of the
file. Servers are free to implement this using
unallocated bytes (holes) or allocated data bytes
set to zero. Clients should not make any assumptions
regarding a server's implementation of this feature,
beyond that the bytes in the affected byte-range returned by
READ will be zeroed. Servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support extending
the file size via SETATTR.
</t>
<t>
SETATTR is not guaranteed to be atomic. A failed SETATTR may partially
change a file's attributes, hence the reason why the reply always
includes the status and the list of attributes that were set.
</t>
<t>
If the object whose attributes are being changed has a file delegation
that is held by a client other than the one doing the SETATTR,
the delegation(s) must be recalled, and the
operation cannot proceed to actually change an attribute
until each such delegation is returned
or revoked.
In all cases in which delegations are recalled, the server
is likely to return one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors while the
delegation(s) remains outstanding, although it might not do that if the
delegations are returned quickly.
</t>
<t>
If the object whose attributes are being set is a directory
and another client holds a directory delegation for that
directory, then if enabled, asynchronous notifications will be generated
when the set of attributes changed has a non-null intersection
with the set of attributes for which notification is requested.
Notifications of type NOTIFY4_CHANGE_DIR_ATTRS will be sent to
the appropriate client(s), but the SETATTR is not delayed by
waiting for these notifications to be sent.
</t>
<t>
If the object whose attributes are being set is a member of
the directory for which another client holds a directory delegation,
then asynchronous notifications will be generated
when the set of attributes changed has a non-null intersection
with the set of attributes for which notification is requested.
Notifications of type NOTIFY4_CHANGE_CHILD_ATTRS will be sent to
the appropriate clients, but the SETATTR is not delayed by
waiting for these notifications to be sent.
</t>
<t>
Changing the size of a file with SETATTR indirectly
changes the time_modify and change attributes.
A client must account for this as size changes can
result in data deletion.
</t>
<t>
The attributes time_access_set and time_modify_set are write-only
attributes constructed as a switched union so the client can direct
the server in setting the time values. If the switched union
specifies SET_TO_CLIENT_TIME4, the client has provided an nfstime4 to
be used for the operation. If the switch union does not specify
SET_TO_CLIENT_TIME4, the server is to use its current time for the
SETATTR operation.
</t>
<t>
If server and client times differ, programs that compare client time
to file times can break. A time synchronization protocol should be used to
limit client/server time skew.
</t>
<t>
Use of a COMPOUND containing a VERIFY operation specifying only the
change attribute, immediately followed by a SETATTR, provides a means
whereby a client may specify a request that emulates the functionality
of the SETATTR guard mechanism of NFSv3. Since the function
of the guard mechanism is to avoid changes to the file attributes
based on stale information, delays between checking of the guard
condition and the setting of the attributes have the potential to
compromise this function, as would the corresponding delay in the
NFSv4 emulation. Therefore, NFSv4.1 servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> take
care to avoid such delays, to the degree possible, when executing such
a request.
</t>
<t>
If the server does not support an attribute as requested by the
client, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP.
</t>
<t>
A mask of the attributes actually set is returned by SETATTR in all
cases. That mask <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> include attribute bits not requested to be
set by the client.
If the attribute masks in the request and
reply are equal, the status field in the reply <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be NFS4_OK.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_VERIFY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 37: VERIFY - Verify Same Attributes</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_VERIFY_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct VERIFY4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: object */
fattr4 obj_attributes;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_VERIFY_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct VERIFY4res {
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_VERIFY_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The VERIFY operation is used to verify that attributes have the value
assumed by the client before proceeding with the following operations in
the COMPOUND request. If any of the attributes do not match, then the
error NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME must be returned. The current filehandle
retains its value after successful completion of the operation.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_VERIFY_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
One possible use of the VERIFY operation is the following series
of operations. With this, the client is attempting to verify that the file
being removed will match what the client expects to be removed. This
series can help prevent the unintended deletion of a file.
</t>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
PUTFH (directory filehandle)
LOOKUP (file name)
VERIFY (filehandle == fh)
PUTFH (directory filehandle)
REMOVE (file name)]]></sourcecode>
<t>
This series does not prevent a second client from removing and
creating a new file in the middle of this sequence, but it does help
avoid the unintended result.
</t>
<t>
In the case that a <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> attribute is specified in the VERIFY
operation and the server does not support that attribute for the
file system object, the error NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUPP is returned to the
client.
</t>
<t>
When the attribute rdattr_error or any set-only attribute (e.g.,
time_modify_set) is specified, the error NFS4ERR_INVAL is returned to
the client.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_WRITE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 38: WRITE - Write to File</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_WRITE_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum stable_how4 {
UNSTABLE4 = 0,
DATA_SYNC4 = 1,
FILE_SYNC4 = 2
};
struct WRITE4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
stateid4 stateid;
offset4 offset;
stable_how4 stable;
opaque data<>;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_WRITE_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct WRITE4resok {
count4 count;
stable_how4 committed;
verifier4 writeverf;
};
union WRITE4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
WRITE4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_WRITE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The WRITE operation is used to write data to a regular file. The
target file is specified by the current filehandle. The offset
specifies the offset where the data should be written. An offset of zero
specifies that the write should start at the beginning of the
file. The count, as encoded as part of the opaque data parameter,
represents the number of bytes of data that are to be written. If the
count is zero, the WRITE will succeed and return a count of zero subject to permissions checking. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
write fewer bytes than requested by the client.
</t>
<t>
The client specifies with the stable parameter the method
of how the data is to be processed by the server. If stable is
FILE_SYNC4, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> commit the data written plus all
file system metadata to stable storage before returning results. This
corresponds to the NFSv2 protocol semantics. Any other
behavior constitutes a protocol violation. If stable is DATA_SYNC4,
then the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> commit all of the data to stable storage and
enough of the metadata to retrieve the data before returning. The
server implementor is free to implement DATA_SYNC4 in the same fashion
as FILE_SYNC4, but with a possible performance drop. If stable is
UNSTABLE4, the server is free to commit any part of the data and the
metadata to stable storage, including all or none, before returning a
reply to the client. There is no guarantee whether or when any
uncommitted data will subsequently be committed to stable storage. The
only guarantees made by the server are that it will not destroy any
data without changing the value of writeverf and that it will not commit
the data and metadata at a level less than that requested by the
client.
</t>
<t>
Except when special stateids are used, the
stateid value for a WRITE request represents a value returned from
a previous byte-range LOCK or OPEN request or the stateid
associated with a delegation. The stateid identifies the associated
owners if any and is
used by the server to verify that the associated locks are still
valid (e.g., have not been revoked).
</t>
<t>
Upon successful completion, the following results are returned. The
count result is the number of bytes of data written to the file. The
server may write fewer bytes than requested. If so, the actual number
of bytes written starting at location, offset, is returned.
</t>
<t>
The server also returns an indication of the level of commitment of
the data and metadata via committed.
Per <xref target="stable_committed" format="default"/>,
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> commit the data at a stronger level
than requested.
</li>
<li>
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> commit the data at a level at
least as high as that committed.
</li>
</ul>
<table anchor="stable_committed" align="center">
<name>Valid Combinations of the Fields Stable in the Request and Committed in the Reply</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">stable</th>
<th align="left">committed</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">UNSTABLE4</td>
<td align="left">FILE_SYNC4, DATA_SYNC4, UNSTABLE4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">DATA_SYNC4</td>
<td align="left">FILE_SYNC4, DATA_SYNC4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FILE_SYNC4</td>
<td align="left">FILE_SYNC4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
The final portion of the result is the field
writeverf. This field is the write verifier and is a
cookie that the client can use to determine whether
a server has changed instance state (e.g., server
restart) between a call to WRITE and a subsequent
call to either WRITE or COMMIT. This cookie <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
unchanged during a single instance of the NFSv4.1
server and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be unique between instances of the
NFSv4.1 server. If the cookie changes, then the
client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> assume that any data written with an
UNSTABLE4 value for committed and an old writeverf in the reply
has been lost and will need to be recovered.
</t>
<t>
If a client writes data to the server with the stable argument set to
UNSTABLE4 and the reply yields a committed response of DATA_SYNC4 or
UNSTABLE4, the client will follow up some time in the future with a
COMMIT operation to synchronize outstanding asynchronous data and
metadata with the server's stable storage, barring client error. It is
possible that due to client crash or other error that a subsequent
COMMIT will not be received by the server.
</t>
<t>
For a WRITE with a stateid value of all bits equal to zero, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> allow
the WRITE to be serviced subject to mandatory byte-range locks or the
current share deny modes for the file. For a WRITE with a stateid
value of all bits equal to 1, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> allow the WRITE operation to
bypass locking checks at the server and otherwise is
treated as if a stateid of all bits equal to zero were used.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_WRITE_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
It is possible for the server to write fewer bytes of data than
requested by the client. In this case, the server <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> return
an error unless no data was written at all. If the server writes less
than the number of bytes specified, the client will need to send another
WRITE to write the remaining data.
</t>
<t>
It is assumed that the act of writing data to
a file will cause the time_modified and change
attributes of the file to be updated. However,
these attributes <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be changed
unless the contents of the file are changed. Thus,
a WRITE request with count set to zero <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> cause
the time_modified and change attributes of the file to be updated.
</t>
<t>
Stable storage is persistent storage that survives:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Repeated power failures.
</li>
<li>
Hardware failures (of any board, power supply, etc.).
</li>
<li>
Repeated software crashes and restarts.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
This definition does not address failure of the stable storage module
itself.
</t>
<t>
The verifier is defined to allow a client to detect
different instances of an NFSv4.1 protocol server
over which cached, uncommitted data may be lost. In
the most likely case, the verifier allows the client
to detect server restarts. This information is
required so that the client can safely determine
whether the server could have lost cached data.
If the server fails unexpectedly and the client has
uncommitted data from previous WRITE requests (done
with the stable argument set to UNSTABLE4 and in
which the result committed was returned as UNSTABLE4
as well), the server might not have flushed cached
data to stable storage. The burden of recovery is
on the client, and the client will need to retransmit
the data to the server.
</t>
<t>
A suggested verifier would be to use the time that
the server was last started (if restarting the server
results in lost buffers).
</t>
<t>
The reply's committed field allows the client to do more
effective caching. If the server is committing all WRITE requests to
stable storage, then it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return with committed set to FILE_SYNC4,
regardless of the value of the stable field in the arguments. A server
that uses an NVRAM accelerator may choose to implement this policy.
The client can use this to increase the effectiveness of the cache by
discarding cached data that has already been committed on the server.
</t>
<t>
Some implementations may return NFS4ERR_NOSPC instead
of NFS4ERR_DQUOT when a user's quota is exceeded.
</t>
<t>
In the case that the current filehandle is of
type NF4DIR, the server will return NFS4ERR_ISDIR.
If the current file is a symbolic link, the error
NFS4ERR_SYMLINK will be returned. Otherwise, if the
current filehandle does not designate an ordinary
file, the server will return NFS4ERR_WRONG_TYPE.
</t>
<t>
If mandatory byte-range locking is in effect for the file,
and the corresponding byte-range of the data to
be written to the file is READ_LT or WRITE_LT locked by
an owner that is not associated with the stateid,
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_LOCKED. If so,
the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> check if the owner corresponding
to the stateid used with the WRITE operation has a
conflicting READ_LT lock that overlaps with the byte-range
that was to be written. If the stateid's owner has
no conflicting READ_LT lock, then the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> try
to get the appropriate write byte-range lock via the
LOCK operation before re-attempting the WRITE. When
the WRITE completes, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> release the
byte-range lock via LOCKU.
</t>
<t>
If the stateid's owner had a conflicting READ_LT lock, then the client
has no choice but to return an error to the application that attempted
the WRITE. The reason is that since the stateid's owner had a READ_LT
lock, either the server attempted to temporarily effectively upgrade
this READ_LT lock to a WRITE_LT lock or the server has no upgrade
capability. If the server attempted to upgrade the READ_LT lock and
failed, it is pointless for the client to re-attempt the upgrade via
the LOCK operation, because there might be another client also trying
to upgrade. If two clients are blocked trying to upgrade the same lock,
the clients deadlock. If the server has no upgrade capability, then
it is pointless to try a LOCK operation to upgrade.
</t>
<t>
If one or more other clients have delegations for the file being
written, those delegations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be recalled, and the
operation cannot proceed until those delegations are returned
or revoked. Except where this
happens very quickly, one or more NFS4ERR_DELAY errors will be
returned to requests made while the delegation remains outstanding.
Normally, delegations will not be recalled as a result of a WRITE
operation since the recall will occur as a result of an earlier
OPEN. However, since it is possible for a WRITE to be done with
a special stateid, the server needs to check for this case even
though the client should have done an OPEN previously.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 40: BACKCHANNEL_CTL - Backchannel Control</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
typedef opaque gsshandle4_t<>;
struct gss_cb_handles4 {
rpc_gss_svc_t gcbp_service; /* RFC 2203 */
gsshandle4_t gcbp_handle_from_server;
gsshandle4_t gcbp_handle_from_client;
};
union callback_sec_parms4 switch (uint32_t cb_secflavor) {
case AUTH_NONE:
void;
case AUTH_SYS:
authsys_parms cbsp_sys_cred; /* RFC 1831 */
case RPCSEC_GSS:
gss_cb_handles4 cbsp_gss_handles;
};
struct BACKCHANNEL_CTL4args {
uint32_t bca_cb_program;
callback_sec_parms4 bca_sec_parms<>;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct BACKCHANNEL_CTL4res {
nfsstat4 bcr_status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_BACKCHANNEL_CTL_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The BACKCHANNEL_CTL operation replaces the
backchannel's callback program number and adds
(not replaces) RPCSEC_GSS handles for use by the
backchannel.
</t>
<t>
The arguments of the BACKCHANNEL_CTL call are
a subset of the CREATE_SESSION parameters.
In the arguments of BACKCHANNEL_CTL, the
bca_cb_program field and bca_sec_parms fields
correspond respectively to the csa_cb_program and
csa_sec_parms fields of the arguments of CREATE_SESSION
(<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
BACKCHANNEL_CTL <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> appear in a COMPOUND that starts
with SEQUENCE.
</t>
<t>
If the RPCSEC_GSS handle identified by
gcbp_handle_from_server does not exist on the server,
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_NOENT.
</t>
<t>
If an RPCSEC_GSS handle is using the SSV context (see <xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>), then because each SSV RPCSEC_GSS
handle shares a common SSV GSS context, there are security
considerations specific to this situation discussed in <xref target="rpcsec_ssv_consider" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 41: BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION - Associate Connection with Session</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum channel_dir_from_client4 {
CDFC4_FORE = 0x1,
CDFC4_BACK = 0x2,
CDFC4_FORE_OR_BOTH = 0x3,
CDFC4_BACK_OR_BOTH = 0x7
};
struct BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION4args {
sessionid4 bctsa_sessid;
channel_dir_from_client4
bctsa_dir;
bool bctsa_use_conn_in_rdma_mode;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum channel_dir_from_server4 {
CDFS4_FORE = 0x1,
CDFS4_BACK = 0x2,
CDFS4_BOTH = 0x3
};
struct BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION4resok {
sessionid4 bctsr_sessid;
channel_dir_from_server4
bctsr_dir;
bool bctsr_use_conn_in_rdma_mode;
};
union BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION4res
switch (nfsstat4 bctsr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION4resok
bctsr_resok4;
default: void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION is used to associate additional connections with a
session. It <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used on the connection being associated with the session. It <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be the only operation in the COMPOUND procedure. If
SP4_NONE (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) state protection
is used, any principal,
security flavor, or RPCSEC_GSS context <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be used to invoke the operation.
If SP4_MACH_CRED is used, RPCSEC_GSS <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used with the
integrity or privacy services, using the principal that
created the client ID. If SP4_SSV is used, RPCSEC_GSS with
the SSV GSS mechanism (<xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>) and integrity or
privacy <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used.
</t>
<t>
If, when the client ID was created, the client opted for SP4_NONE
state protection,
the client is not required to use BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION to associate the
connection with the session, unless
the client wishes to associate the connection with the backchannel.
When SP4_NONE protection is used, simply sending a COMPOUND
request with a SEQUENCE operation is sufficient to associate the
connection with the session specified in SEQUENCE.
</t>
<t>
The field bctsa_dir indicates whether the client
wants to associate the connection with the fore
channel or the backchannel or both channels. The value
CDFC4_FORE_OR_BOTH indicates that the client wants to
associate the connection with both the fore channel and backchannel,
but will accept the connection being associated to
just the fore channel. The value CDFC4_BACK_OR_BOTH
indicates that the client wants to associate with both
the fore channel and backchannel, but will accept the
connection being associated with just the backchannel.
The server replies in bctsr_dir which channel(s)
the connection is associated with.
If the client specified CDFC4_FORE, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return CDFS4_FORE. If the client specified
CDFC4_BACK, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return CDFS4_BACK. If the
client specified CDFC4_FORE_OR_BOTH, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
CDFS4_FORE or CDFS4_BOTH. If the client specified
CDFC4_BACK_OR_BOTH, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return CDFS4_BACK
or CDFS4_BOTH.
</t>
<t>
See the CREATE_SESSION operation (<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION" format="default"/>),
and the description of the argument
csa_use_conn_in_rdma_mode to understand
bctsa_use_conn_in_rdma_mode, and the description of
csr_use_conn_in_rdma_mode to understand bctsr_use_conn_in_rdma_mode.
</t>
<t>
Invoking BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION on a connection already associated
with the specified session has no effect, and the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
respond with NFS4_OK, unless the client is demanding changes
to the set of channels the connection is associated with. If
so, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If a session's channel loses all connections, depending on
the client ID's state protection and type of channel,
the client might need to use
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION to associate a new connection. If the
server restarted and does not keep the reply cache in stable
storage, the server will not recognize the session ID.
The client will ultimately have to invoke EXCHANGE_ID to
create a new client ID and session.
</t>
<t>
Suppose SP4_SSV state protection is being used,
and BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION is among the operations
included in the spo_must_enforce set when the
client ID was created (<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>).
If so, there is an issue if SET_SSV is sent, no response
is returned, and the last connection associated
with the client ID drops. The client, per
the sessions model, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> retry the SET_SSV. But
it needs a new connection to do so, and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
associate that connection with the session via a
BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION authenticated with the SSV
GSS mechanism. The problem is that the RPCSEC_GSS
message integrity codes use a subkey derived from the SSV as the
key and the
SSV may have changed. While there are multiple
recovery strategies, a single, general strategy
is described here.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The client reconnects.
</li>
<li>
The client assumes that the SET_SSV was executed,
and so sends BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION with the subkey (derived from
the new SSV, i.e., what SET_SSV would have set the SSV to)
used as the key for the RPCSEC_GSS credential message integrity codes.
</li>
<li>
If the request succeeds, this means that the original attempted SET_SSV
did execute successfully. The client re-sends the original
SET_SSV, which the server will reply to via the
reply cache.
</li>
<li>
If the server returns an RPC authentication error,
this means that the server's current SSV was not changed
(and the SET_SSV was likely not executed). The client then
tries BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION with the subkey derived from the
old SSV as the
key for the RPCSEC_GSS message integrity codes.
</li>
<li>
The attempted BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION with the old SSV
should succeed. If so, the client re-sends the original
SET_SSV. If the original SET_SSV was not executed, then the
server executes it. If the original SET_SSV was executed but
failed, the server will return the SET_SSV from the reply
cache.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 42: EXCHANGE_ID - Instantiate Client ID</name>
<t>
The EXCHANGE_ID operation exchanges long-hand client and server identifiers
(owners) and provides access to a client ID, creating one
if necessary. This client ID becomes associated with the connection
on which the operation is done, so that it is available when a
CREATE_SESSION is done or when the connection is used to issue
a request
on an existing session associated with the current client.
</t>
<section anchor="EXID-arg" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_SUPP_MOVED_REFER = 0x00000001;
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_SUPP_MOVED_MIGR = 0x00000002;
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID = 0x00000100;
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS = 0x00010000;
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS = 0x00020000;
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS = 0x00040000;
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_MASK_PNFS = 0x00070000;
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A = 0x40000000;
const EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R = 0x80000000;
struct state_protect_ops4 {
bitmap4 spo_must_enforce;
bitmap4 spo_must_allow;
};
struct ssv_sp_parms4 {
state_protect_ops4 ssp_ops;
sec_oid4 ssp_hash_algs<>;
sec_oid4 ssp_encr_algs<>;
uint32_t ssp_window;
uint32_t ssp_num_gss_handles;
};
enum state_protect_how4 {
SP4_NONE = 0,
SP4_MACH_CRED = 1,
SP4_SSV = 2
};
union state_protect4_a switch(state_protect_how4 spa_how) {
case SP4_NONE:
void;
case SP4_MACH_CRED:
state_protect_ops4 spa_mach_ops;
case SP4_SSV:
ssv_sp_parms4 spa_ssv_parms;
};
struct EXCHANGE_ID4args {
client_owner4 eia_clientowner;
uint32_t eia_flags;
state_protect4_a eia_state_protect;
nfs_impl_id4 eia_client_impl_id<1>;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section anchor="EXID-res" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct ssv_prot_info4 {
state_protect_ops4 spi_ops;
uint32_t spi_hash_alg;
uint32_t spi_encr_alg;
uint32_t spi_ssv_len;
uint32_t spi_window;
gsshandle4_t spi_handles<>;
};
union state_protect4_r switch(state_protect_how4 spr_how) {
case SP4_NONE:
void;
case SP4_MACH_CRED:
state_protect_ops4 spr_mach_ops;
case SP4_SSV:
ssv_prot_info4 spr_ssv_info;
};
struct EXCHANGE_ID4resok {
clientid4 eir_clientid;
sequenceid4 eir_sequenceid;
uint32_t eir_flags;
state_protect4_r eir_state_protect;
server_owner4 eir_server_owner;
opaque eir_server_scope<NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT>;
nfs_impl_id4 eir_server_impl_id<1>;
};
union EXCHANGE_ID4res switch (nfsstat4 eir_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
EXCHANGE_ID4resok eir_resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section anchor="OP_EXCHANGE_ID_DESCRIPTION" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The client uses the EXCHANGE_ID operation to register
a particular instance of that client with the server,
as represented by a client_owner4. However,
when the client_owner4 has already been registered
by other means (e.g., Transparent State Migration), the
client may still use EXCHANGE_ID to obtain the client ID
assigned previously.
</t>
<t>
The client ID returned from this
operation will be associated with the connection
on which the EXCHANGE_ID is received and
will serve as a parent object for
sessions created by the client on this connection or
to which the connection is bound. As a result of using
those sessions to make requests involving the creation
of state, that state will become associated with the
client ID returned.
</t>
<t>
In situations in which the registration of the
client_owner has not occurred previously,
the client ID must first be used, along with
the returned eir_sequenceid, in creating an
associated session using
CREATE_SESSION.
</t>
<t>
If the flag EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R is set in the
result, eir_flags, then it is an indication that the
registration of the client_owner has already occurred
and that a further CREATE_SESSION is not needed to
confirm it. Of course, subsequent CREATE_SESSION
operations may
be needed for other reasons.
</t>
<t>
The value eir_sequenceid is used to establish an initial
sequence value associated with the client ID returned. In
cases in which a CREATE_SESSION has already been done,
there is no need for this value, since sequencing of
such request has already been established, and the client
has no need for this value and will ignore it.
</t>
<t>
EXCHANGE_ID <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be sent in a COMPOUND procedure that starts with
SEQUENCE. However, when a client communicates with a server
for the first time, it will not have a session, so using
SEQUENCE will not be possible.
If EXCHANGE_ID is sent without a preceding SEQUENCE, then it
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the only operation in the COMPOUND procedure's request. If
it is not, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP.
</t>
<t>
The eia_clientowner field is composed of a co_verifier
field and a co_ownerid string. As noted in
<xref target="Client_Identifiers" format="default"/>, the co_ownerid
identifies the client, and the co_verifier specifies a particular
incarnation of that client. An EXCHANGE_ID
sent with a new incarnation of the client will
lead to the server removing lock state of the old
incarnation. On the other hand, when an EXCHANGE_ID sent with the current
incarnation and co_ownerid does not result in an unrelated error,
it will potentially update an existing client ID's properties or
simply return information about the existing client_id. The latter
would happen when this operation is done to the same server
using different network addresses as part of creating trunked
connections.
</t>
<t>
A server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> provide the same client ID to two different
incarnations of an eia_clientowner.
</t>
<t>
In addition to the client ID and sequence ID, the server
returns a server owner (eir_server_owner) and
server scope (eir_server_scope). The former field is used
in connection with
network trunking as described in <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>. The latter field is used to
allow clients to determine when client IDs sent by
one server may be recognized by another in the event
of file system migration (see <xref target="SEC11-EFF-lock" format="default"/> of the current document).
</t>
<t>
The client ID returned by EXCHANGE_ID is only unique
relative to the combination of eir_server_owner.so_major_id
and eir_server_scope. Thus, if two servers return the
same client ID, the onus is on the client to
distinguish the client IDs on the basis of eir_server_owner.so_major_id
and eir_server_scope. In the event two different servers
claim matching server_owner.so_major_id and eir_server_scope,
the client can use the verification techniques discussed
in <xref target="PREP-trunk-verify" format="default"/> to determine if the servers
are distinct. If they are distinct, then the client
will need to note the destination network addresses
of the connections used with each server and use
the network address as the final discriminator.
</t>
<t>
The server, as defined by the unique identity expressed
in the so_major_id of the server owner and the server scope,
needs to track several properties of each client ID it
hands out. The properties apply to the client ID and all
sessions associated with the client ID.
The properties are derived from the
arguments and results of EXCHANGE_ID.
The client ID properties include:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
The capabilities expressed by the following bits, which
come from the results of EXCHANGE_ID:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>EXCHGID4_FLAG_SUPP_MOVED_REFER</li>
<li>EXCHGID4_FLAG_SUPP_MOVED_MIGR </li>
<li>EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID </li>
<li>EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS </li>
<li>EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS </li>
<li>EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS </li>
</ul>
<t>
These properties may be updated by subsequent
EXCHANGE_ID operations on confirmed client IDs though the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
refuse to change them.
</t>
</li>
<li>
The state protection method used, one of SP4_NONE,
SP4_MACH_CRED, or SP4_SSV, as set by the spa_how
field of the arguments to EXCHANGE_ID. Once the
client ID is confirmed, this property cannot be
updated by subsequent EXCHANGE_ID operations.
</li>
<li>
<t>
For SP4_MACH_CRED or SP4_SSV state protection:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The list of operations (spo_must_enforce) that <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the specified
state protection. This list comes
from the results of EXCHANGE_ID.
</li>
<li>
The list of operations (spo_must_allow) that <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use the specified
state protection. This list comes
from the results of EXCHANGE_ID.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Once the client ID is confirmed, these properties
cannot be updated by subsequent EXCHANGE_ID
requests.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
For SP4_SSV protection:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The OID of the hash algorithm. This property is
represented by one of the algorithms in the
ssp_hash_algs field of the EXCHANGE_ID arguments.
Once the client ID is confirmed, this property
cannot be updated by subsequent EXCHANGE_ID
requests.
</li>
<li>
The OID of the encryption algorithm. This property
is represented by one of the algorithms in the
ssp_encr_algs field of the EXCHANGE_ID arguments.
Once the client ID is confirmed, this property
cannot be updated by subsequent EXCHANGE_ID
requests.
</li>
<li>
<t>
The length of the SSV. This property is
represented by the spi_ssv_len field in the EXCHANGE_ID
results.
Once the client ID is confirmed,
this property cannot be updated by
subsequent EXCHANGE_ID operations.
</t>
<t>
There are <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> and <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> relationships among the
length of the key of the encryption algorithm ("key length"), the length of the
output of hash algorithm ("hash length"), and the length of the SSV ("SSV length").
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
key length <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= hash length. This is because the keys used for
the encryption algorithm are actually subkeys derived from the SSV,
and the derivation is via the hash algorithm. The selection of an
encryption algorithm with a key length that exceeded the length of
the output of the hash algorithm would require padding, and thus
weaken the use of the encryption algorithm.
</li>
<li>
hash length <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &lt;= SSV length. This is because the
SSV is a key used to derive subkeys via an HMAC, and
it is recommended that the key used as input to an HMAC be
at least as long as the length of the HMAC's hash algorithm's
output (see <xref target="RFC2104" sectionFormat="of" section="3"/>).
</li>
<li>
key length <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &lt;= SSV length. This is a transitive result of the
above two invariants.
</li>
<li>
key length <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &gt;= hash length / 2. This is because the subkey
derivation is via
an HMAC and it is recommended that if the HMAC has to be truncated,
it should not be truncated to less than half the hash length
(see Section <xref target="RFC2104" sectionFormat="bare" section="4"/>
of RFC 2104 <xref target="RFC2104" format="default"/>).
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Number of concurrent versions of the SSV the client
and server will support (see <xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>).
This property is represented by spi_window
in the EXCHANGE_ID results. The property may be
updated by subsequent EXCHANGE_ID operations.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
The client's implementation ID as represented by
the eia_client_impl_id field of the arguments.
The property may be updated by subsequent EXCHANGE_ID
requests.
</li>
<li>
The server's implementation ID as represented by
the eir_server_impl_id field of the reply.
The property may be updated by replies to subsequent EXCHANGE_ID
requests.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The eia_flags passed as part of the arguments and
the eir_flags results allow the client and server
to inform each other of their capabilities as well
as indicate how the client ID will be used. Whether
a bit is set or cleared on the arguments' flags
does not force the server to set or clear the same
bit on the results' side. Bits not defined above
cannot be set in the eia_flags field. If they
are, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reject the operation with
NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
<t>
The EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A bit can only be set
in eia_flags; it is always off in eir_flags.
The EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R bit can only be set in
eir_flags; it is always off in eia_flags. If the
server recognizes the co_ownerid and co_verifier
as mapping to a confirmed client ID, it sets
EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R in eir_flags.
The EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R flag allows a client
to tell if the client ID it is trying to create
already exists and is confirmed.
</t>
<t>
If EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is set in eia_flags,
this means that the client is attempting to update properties
of an existing confirmed client ID (if the client wants to
update properties of an unconfirmed client ID, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
set EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A).
If so, it is
<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that the client send the update EXCHANGE_ID
operation in the same COMPOUND as a SEQUENCE so that
the EXCHANGE_ID is executed exactly once. Whether
the client can update the properties of client ID
depends on the state protection it selected when the
client ID was created, and the principal and security
flavor it used when sending the EXCHANGE_ID operation.
The situations described in items
<xref target="case_update" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="case_update_noent" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="case_update_exist" format="counter"/>,
or
<xref target="case_update_perm" format="counter"/>
of the second numbered list of <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/> below will apply.
Note that if the operation succeeds
and returns a client ID that is already
confirmed, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the
EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R bit in eir_flags.
</t>
<t>
If EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is not set in eia_flags,
this means that the client is trying to establish a new
client ID; it is
attempting to trunk data communication to
the server (See <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>); or it
is attempting to update properties of an unconfirmed
client ID. The
situations described in
items
<xref target="case_new_owner_id" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="case_non_update" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="case_client_collision" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="case_retry" format="counter"/>, or
<xref target="case_client_restart" format="counter"/>
of the second numbered list of <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/> below will apply.
Note that if the operation succeeds
and returns a client ID that was previously
confirmed, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the
EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R bit in eir_flags.
</t>
<t>
When the EXCHGID4_FLAG_SUPP_MOVED_REFER flag bit
is set, the client indicates that it is capable
of dealing with an NFS4ERR_MOVED error as part of
a referral sequence. When this bit is not set, it
is still legal for the server to perform a referral
sequence. However, a server may use the fact that
the client is incapable of correctly responding
to a referral, by avoiding it for that particular
client. It may, for instance, act as a proxy
for that particular file system, at some cost in
performance, although it is not obligated to do so.
If the server will potentially perform a referral, it
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set EXCHGID4_FLAG_SUPP_MOVED_REFER in eir_flags.
</t>
<t>
When the EXCHGID4_FLAG_SUPP_MOVED_MIGR is set,
the client indicates that it is capable of dealing
with an NFS4ERR_MOVED error as part of a file system
migration sequence. When this bit is not set, it
is still legal for the server to indicate that a
file system has moved, when this in fact happens.
However, a server may use the fact that the client
is incapable of correctly responding to a migration
in its scheduling of file systems to migrate so as to
avoid migration of file systems being actively used.
It may also hide actual migrations from clients
unable to deal with them by acting as a proxy for a
migrated file system for particular clients, at some
cost in performance, although it is not obligated
to do so. If the server will potentially perform a
migration, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set EXCHGID4_FLAG_SUPP_MOVED_MIGR
in eir_flags.
</t>
<t>
When EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID is set, the
client indicates that it wants the server to bind the
stateid to the principal. This means that when a
principal creates a stateid, it has to be the one to
use the stateid. If the server will perform binding,
it will return EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID. The
server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID
even if the client does not request it. If
an update to the client ID changes the value
of EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID's client
ID property, the effect applies only to new
stateids. Existing stateids (and all stateids with
the same "other" field) that were created with
stateid to principal binding in force will continue
to have binding in force. Existing stateids (and all
stateids with the same "other" field) that were created
with stateid to principal not in force will continue
to have binding not in force.
</t>
<t>
The EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_NON_PNFS,
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_MDS, and
EXCHGID4_FLAG_USE_PNFS_DS bits are described in
<xref target="pnfs_session_stuff"/>
and convey roles the
client ID is to be used for in a pNFS environment.
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set one of the acceptable combinations
of these bits (roles) in eir_flags, as specified in that
section.
Note that the same client owner/server owner pair can
have multiple roles. Multiple roles can be associated
with the same client ID or with different client
IDs. Thus, if a client sends EXCHANGE_ID from the
same client owner to the same server owner multiple
times, but specifies different pNFS roles each time,
the server might return different client IDs. Given
that different pNFS roles might have different client
IDs, the client may ask for different properties for
each role/client ID.
</t>
<t>
The spa_how field of the eia_state_protect field
specifies how the client wants to protect its client,
locking, and session states from unauthorized changes
(<xref target="protect_state_change" format="default"/>):
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
SP4_NONE. The client does not request the NFSv4.1 server
to enforce state protection. The NFSv4.1 server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
enforce state protection for the returned client ID.
</li>
<li>
<t>
SP4_MACH_CRED. If spa_how is SP4_MACH_CRED, then
the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send the EXCHANGE_ID operation with RPCSEC_GSS
as the security flavor, and with a service of
RPC_GSS_SVC_INTEGRITY or RPC_GSS_SVC_PRIVACY. If SP4_MACH_CRED
is specified, then the
client wants to use an RPCSEC_GSS-based machine
credential to protect its state. The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> note
the principal the EXCHANGE_ID operation was sent
with, and the GSS mechanism used. These notes
collectively comprise the machine credential.
</t>
<t>
After the client ID is confirmed, as long as the lease associated with
the client ID is unexpired, a subsequent EXCHANGE_ID
operation that uses the same eia_clientowner.co_owner
as the first EXCHANGE_ID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> also use the same
machine credential as the first EXCHANGE_ID. The
server returns the same client ID for
the subsequent EXCHANGE_ID as that returned from
the first EXCHANGE_ID.
</t>
</li>
<li>
SP4_SSV. If spa_how is SP4_SSV, then
the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send the EXCHANGE_ID operation with RPCSEC_GSS
as the security flavor, and with a service of
RPC_GSS_SVC_INTEGRITY or RPC_GSS_SVC_PRIVACY.
If SP4_SSV is specified, then
the client wants to use the SSV to protect its state.
The server records the credential used in the request
as the machine credential (as defined above) for
the eia_clientowner.co_owner.
The CREATE_SESSION operation that
confirms the client ID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the same machine
credential.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
When a client specifies SP4_MACH_CRED or SP4_SSV,
it also provides two lists of operations (each
expressed as a bitmap). The first list
is spo_must_enforce and consists of those operations
the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send (subject to the server confirming the
list of operations in the result of EXCHANGE_ID) with the
machine credential (if SP4_MACH_CRED protection is
specified) or the SSV-based credential (if SP4_SSV
protection is used). The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send the
operations with RPCSEC_GSS credentials that specify
the RPC_GSS_SVC_INTEGRITY or RPC_GSS_SVC_PRIVACY
security service. Typically, the first list of
operations includes EXCHANGE_ID, CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE, DESTROY_SESSION, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
and DESTROY_CLIENTID. The client <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> specify
in this list any operations that require a filehandle
because the server's access policies <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> conflict with
the client's choice, and thus the client would then be
unable to access a subset of the server's namespace.
</t>
<t>
Note that if SP4_SSV protection is specified, and
the client indicates that CREATE_SESSION must be
protected with SP4_SSV, because the SSV cannot exist
without a confirmed client ID, the first CREATE_SESSION
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> instead be sent using the machine credential,
and the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> accept the machine credential.
</t>
<t>
There is a corresponding result, also called spo_must_enforce,
of the operations for which the server will require SP4_MACH_CRED or
SP4_SSV protection. Normally, the server's result
equals the client's argument, but the result <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be different.
If the client requests one or more operations in
the set { EXCHANGE_ID, CREATE_SESSION,
DELEGPURGE, DESTROY_SESSION, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
DESTROY_CLIENTID }, then the result spo_must_enforce
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> include the operations the client requested from that set.
</t>
<t>
If spo_must_enforce in the results has BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION
set, then connection binding enforcement is enabled, and
the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the machine (if SP4_MACH_CRED protection is used)
or SSV (if SP4_SSV protection is used) credential on calls
to BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION.
</t>
<t>
The second list is spo_must_allow and consists of those
operations
the client wants to have the option of sending with the machine credential or
the SSV-based credential, even if the object the
operations are performed on is not owned by the
machine or SSV credential.
</t>
<t>
The corresponding result, also called
spo_must_allow, consists of the operations the server
will allow the client to use SP4_SSV or SP4_MACH_CRED
credentials with.
Normally, the server's result
equals the client's argument, but the result <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be different.
</t>
<t>
The purpose of spo_must_allow is to allow clients to
solve the following conundrum. Suppose the client ID
is confirmed with EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID,
and it calls OPEN with the RPCSEC_GSS credentials of
a normal user. Now suppose the user's credentials expire,
and cannot be renewed (e.g., a Kerberos ticket granting ticket
expires, and the user has logged off and will not be
acquiring a new ticket granting ticket). The client will be
unable to send CLOSE without the user's credentials, which is to
say the client has to either leave the state on the server
or re-send EXCHANGE_ID with a new verifier to
clear all state, that is, unless the client includes
CLOSE on the list of operations in spo_must_allow and the
server agrees.
</t>
<t>
The SP4_SSV protection parameters also have:
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>ssp_hash_algs:</dt>
<dd><t>
This is the set of algorithms the client supports
for the purpose of computing the digests needed for
the internal SSV GSS mechanism and for the SET_SSV
operation. Each algorithm is specified as an object
identifier (OID). The <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> algorithms for a
server are id-sha1, id-sha224, id-sha256, id-sha384,
and id-sha512 <xref target="RFC4055" format="default"/>.</t>
<t>
Due to known weaknesses in id-sha1, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>
that the client specify at least one
algorithm within ssp_hash_algs other than id-sha1.</t>
<t>
The algorithm the server selects among the
set is indicated in spi_hash_alg, a field of
spr_ssv_prot_info. The field spi_hash_alg is an
index into the array ssp_hash_algs. Because of
known the weaknesses in id-sha1, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that
it not be selected by the server as long as ssp_hash_algs
contains any other supported algorithm.</t>
<t>
If the server
does not support any of the offered algorithms,
it returns NFS4ERR_HASH_ALG_UNSUPP.
If ssp_hash_algs is empty, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_INVAL. </t>
</dd>
<dt>ssp_encr_algs:</dt>
<dd>
This is the set of algorithms the client supports for the
purpose of providing privacy protection for the internal
SSV GSS mechanism. Each algorithm is
specified as an OID.
The <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> algorithm for a server is id-aes256-CBC.
The <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> algorithms are id-aes192-CBC and id-aes128-CBC
<xref target="CSOR_AES" format="default"/>. The selected algorithm is
returned in spi_encr_alg, an index into ssp_encr_algs.
If the server
does not support any of the offered algorithms,
it returns NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP.
If ssp_encr_algs is empty, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL.
Note that due to previously stated requirements and recommendations
on the relationships between key length and hash length, some
combinations of <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> and <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> encryption algorithm and
hash algorithm either <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> or <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used.
<xref target="algtbl" format="default"/> summarizes the illegal and discouraged
combinations.
</dd>
<dt>ssp_window:</dt>
<dd>
This is the number of SSV versions the client wants
the server to maintain (i.e., each successful call to SET_SSV
produces a new version of the SSV). If ssp_window is zero, the
server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL. The server responds
with spi_window, which <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> exceed ssp_window and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be at least one.
Any requests on the backchannel or fore channel that
are using a version of the SSV that is outside the window will fail with
an ONC RPC authentication error, and the requester
will have to retry them with the same slot ID and
sequence ID.
</dd>
<dt>ssp_num_gss_handles:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
This is the number of RPCSEC_GSS handles the
server should create that are based on the GSS
SSV mechanism (see
<xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>).
It is not the total number of RPCSEC_GSS handles for
the client ID. Indeed, subsequent calls to EXCHANGE_ID
will add RPCSEC_GSS handles.
The server responds with a list of handles in
spi_handles. If the client asks for at least
one handle and the server cannot create it,
the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return an error. The handles in
spi_handles are not available for use until the
client ID is confirmed, which could be immediately
if EXCHANGE_ID returns EXCHGID4_FLAG_CONFIRMED_R,
or upon successful confirmation from CREATE_SESSION.
</t>
<t>
While a client ID can span all the connections
that are connected to a server sharing the same
eir_server_owner.so_major_id, the RPCSEC_GSS
handles returned in spi_handles can only be used
on connections connected to a server that returns
the same the eir_server_owner.so_major_id and
eir_server_owner.so_minor_id on each connection.
It is permissible for the client to set
ssp_num_gss_handles to zero; the client can
create more handles with another EXCHANGE_ID call.
</t>
<t>
Because each SSV RPCSEC_GSS handle shares a common SSV GSS context,
there are security considerations specific to this situation
discussed in <xref target="rpcsec_ssv_consider" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
The seq_window (see Section <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="bare" section="5.2.3.1"/> of RFC 2203
<xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/>)
of each RPCSEC_GSS handle in spi_handle
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same as the seq_window of
the RPCSEC_GSS handle used for the credential of the RPC request
of which the EXCHANGE_ID operation was sent as a part.
</t>
</dd>
</dl>
<table anchor="algtbl" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Encryption Algorithm</th>
<th align="left"><bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be combined with</th>
<th align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be combined with</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">id-aes128-CBC</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">id-sha384, id-sha512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">id-aes192-CBC</td>
<td align="left">id-sha1</td>
<td align="left">id-sha512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">id-aes256-CBC</td>
<td align="left">id-sha1, id-sha224</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
The arguments include an array of up to one
element in length called eia_client_impl_id. If
eia_client_impl_id is present, it contains the
information identifying the implementation of the
client. Similarly, the results include an array of up
to one element in length called eir_server_impl_id
that identifies the implementation of the server.
Servers <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> accept a zero-length eia_client_impl_id
array, and clients <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> accept a zero-length
eir_server_impl_id array.
</t>
<t>
A possible use for implementation identifiers
would be in diagnostic software that extracts
this information in an attempt to identify
interoperability problems, performance workload
behaviors, or general usage statistics. Since the
intent of having access to this information is for
planning or general diagnosis only, the client and
server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> interpret this implementation
identity information in a way that affects
how the implementation interacts with
its peer. The client and server are not
allowed to depend on the peer's manifesting a particular
allowed behavior based on an implementation identifier
but are required to interoperate as specified elsewhere
in the protocol specification.
</t>
<t>
Because it is possible that some implementations might
violate the protocol specification and interpret
the identity information, implementations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
provide facilities to allow the NFSv4 client and server
to be configured to set the contents of the nfs_impl_id structures sent
to any specified value.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="OP_EXCHANGE_ID_IMPLEMENTATION" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
A server's client record is a 5-tuple:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
<t>co_ownerid:
</t>
<t>
The client identifier string, from the eia_clientowner
structure of the EXCHANGE_ID4args structure.</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>co_verifier:
</t>
<t>A client-specific value used to indicate incarnations (where a client restart represents a new incarnation), from the
eia_clientowner structure of the EXCHANGE_ID4args
structure.</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>principal:
</t>
<t>
The principal that was defined in the RPC header's credential
and/or verifier at the time the client record was
established.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>client ID:
</t>
<t>The shorthand client identifier, generated by the server and
returned via the eir_clientid field in the EXCHANGE_ID4resok
structure.</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>confirmed:
</t>
<t>A private field on the server indicating whether or not a
client record has been confirmed. A client record is
confirmed if there has been a successful CREATE_SESSION
operation to confirm it. Otherwise, it is unconfirmed. An
unconfirmed record is established by an EXCHANGE_ID call.
Any unconfirmed record that is not confirmed within a lease
period <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be removed.</t>
</li>
</ol>
<!-- [auth] start new list -->
<t>
The following identifiers represent special values for the fields
in the records.
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>ownerid_arg:</dt>
<dd>
The value of the eia_clientowner.co_ownerid subfield of the
EXCHANGE_ID4args structure of the current request.
</dd>
<dt>verifier_arg:</dt>
<dd>
The value of the eia_clientowner.co_verifier subfield of the
EXCHANGE_ID4args structure of the current request.
</dd>
<dt>old_verifier_arg:</dt>
<dd>
A value of the eia_clientowner.co_verifier field of a client record
received in a previous request; this is distinct from
verifier_arg.
</dd>
<dt>principal_arg:</dt>
<dd>
The value of the RPCSEC_GSS principal for the current request.
</dd>
<dt>old_principal_arg:</dt>
<dd>
A value of the principal of a client record as defined by the
RPC header's credential or verifier of a previous request.
This is distinct from principal_arg.
</dd>
<dt>clientid_ret:</dt>
<dd>
The value of the eir_clientid field the server will return in the
EXCHANGE_ID4resok structure for the current request.
</dd>
<dt>old_clientid_ret:</dt>
<dd>
The value of the eir_clientid field the server returned in the
EXCHANGE_ID4resok structure for a previous request. This
is distinct from clientid_ret.
</dd>
<dt>confirmed:</dt>
<dd>
The client ID has been confirmed.
</dd>
<dt>unconfirmed:</dt>
<dd>
The client ID has not been confirmed.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
Since EXCHANGE_ID is a non-idempotent operation, we must
consider the possibility that retries occur as a result of a
client restart, network partition, malfunctioning router, etc.
Retries are identified by the value of the eia_clientowner field of
EXCHANGE_ID4args, and the method for dealing with them is
outlined in the scenarios below.
</t>
<t>
The scenarios are described in terms of the
client record(s) a server has for a given
co_ownerid. Note that if the client ID
was created specifying SP4_SSV state protection and
EXCHANGE_ID as the one of the operations in spo_must_allow,
then the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> authorize EXCHANGE_IDs with the SSV
principal in addition to the principal that created the
client ID.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li anchor="case_new_owner_id">
<t>New Owner ID
</t>
<t>
If the server has no client records
with eia_clientowner.co_ownerid matching
ownerid_arg, and EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is not
set in the EXCHANGE_ID, then a new shorthand
client ID (let us call it clientid_ret)
is generated, and the following unconfirmed
record is added to the server's state.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, verifier_arg, principal_arg, clientid_ret, unconfirmed }
</t>
<t>
Subsequently, the server returns clientid_ret.
</t>
</li>
<li anchor="case_non_update">
<t>Non-Update on Existing Client ID</t>
<t>
If the server has the following confirmed record, and
the request does not have
EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A set,
then the request is the result of a retried request due to a
faulty router or lost connection, or
the client is trying to determine if it can perform
trunking.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, verifier_arg, principal_arg, clientid_ret, confirmed }
</t>
<t>
Since the record has been confirmed, the client
must have received the server's reply from
the initial EXCHANGE_ID request. Since the
server has a confirmed record, and since
EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is not set, with the
possible exception of eir_server_owner.so_minor_id, the
server returns the same result it did when
the client ID's properties were last updated
(or if never updated, the result when the
client ID was created). The confirmed record
is unchanged.
</t>
</li>
<li anchor="case_client_collision">
<t>Client Collision
</t>
<t>
If EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is not set, and
if the server has the following confirmed
record, then this request is likely the result
of a chance collision between the values of
the eia_clientowner.co_ownerid subfield of
EXCHANGE_ID4args for two different clients.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, *, old_principal_arg, old_clientid_ret, confirmed }
</t>
<t>
If there is currently no state associated with old_clientid_ret,
or if there is state but the lease has expired, then
this case is effectively equivalent to the
New Owner ID case of <xref target="case_new_owner_id" format="default"/>.
The confirmed record is deleted, the old_clientid_ret and its
lock state are deleted,
a new shorthand client ID
is generated, and the following unconfirmed
record is added to the server's state.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, verifier_arg, principal_arg, clientid_ret, unconfirmed }
</t>
<t>
Subsequently, the server returns clientid_ret.
</t>
<t>
If old_clientid_ret has an unexpired lease with state, then
no state of old_clientid_ret is changed or deleted.
The server returns NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE
to indicate that the client should
retry with a different value for the
eia_clientowner.co_ownerid subfield of
EXCHANGE_ID4args. The client record is not changed.</t>
</li>
<li anchor="case_retry">
<t>Replacement of Unconfirmed Record
</t>
<t>
If the EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A flag is not set,
and the server has the following unconfirmed record, then
the client is attempting EXCHANGE_ID again on an
unconfirmed client ID, perhaps due to a retry, a client
restart before client ID confirmation (i.e.,
before CREATE_SESSION was called), or
some other reason.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, *, *, old_clientid_ret, unconfirmed }
</t>
<t>
It is possible that
the properties of old_clientid_ret are
different than those specified in the current
EXCHANGE_ID. Whether or not the properties are being updated,
to eliminate ambiguity, the server
deletes the unconfirmed record, generates a
new client ID (clientid_ret), and establishes
the following unconfirmed record:
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, verifier_arg, principal_arg, clientid_ret, unconfirmed }
</t>
</li>
<li anchor="case_client_restart">
<t>Client Restart</t>
<t>
If EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is not set, and
if the server has the following confirmed client record, then
this request is likely from a previously confirmed client
that has restarted.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, old_verifier_arg, principal_arg, old_clientid_ret, confirmed }
</t>
<t>
Since the previous incarnation of the same
client will no longer be making requests,
once the new client ID is confirmed by
CREATE_SESSION, byte-range locks and share reservations
should be released immediately rather than
forcing the new incarnation to wait for
the lease time on the previous incarnation
to expire. Furthermore, session state should
be removed since if the client had maintained
that information across restart, this request
would not have been sent. If the server
supports neither the CLAIM_DELEGATE_PREV
nor CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH
claim types, associated delegations should be
purged as well; otherwise, delegations are
retained and recovery proceeds according to
<xref target="delegation_recovery" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
After processing, clientid_ret is returned to the client and
this client record is added:
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, verifier_arg, principal_arg, clientid_ret, unconfirmed }
</t>
<t>
The previously described confirmed record
continues to exist, and thus the same
ownerid_arg exists in both a confirmed and
unconfirmed state at the same time. The number
of states can collapse to one once the server
receives an applicable CREATE_SESSION or
EXCHANGE_ID.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the server subsequently receives a successful
CREATE_SESSION that confirms clientid_ret,
then the server atomically destroys the
confirmed record and makes the unconfirmed
record confirmed as described in
<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
If the server instead subsequently receives
an EXCHANGE_ID with the client owner equal
to ownerid_arg, one strategy is to simply
delete the unconfirmed record, and process the
EXCHANGE_ID as described in the entirety of
<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li anchor="case_update">
<t>Update
</t>
<t>
If EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is set, and the
server has the following confirmed record,
then this request is an attempt at an update.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, verifier_arg, principal_arg, clientid_ret, confirmed }
</t>
<t>
Since the record has been confirmed, the client must have
received the server's reply from the initial EXCHANGE_ID
request. The server allows the update, and the client record
is left intact.
</t>
</li>
<li anchor="case_update_noent">
<t>Update but No Confirmed Record
</t>
<t>
If EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is set, and the
server has no confirmed record corresponding ownerid_arg,
then the server returns NFS4ERR_NOENT and leaves any unconfirmed
record intact.
</t>
</li>
<li anchor="case_update_exist">
<t>Update but Wrong Verifier
</t>
<t>
If EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is set, and the
server has the following confirmed record,
then this request is an illegal attempt at an
update, perhaps because of a retry from a previous client
incarnation.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, old_verifier_arg, *, clientid_ret, confirmed }
</t>
<t>
The server returns NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME and leaves the client record
intact.
</t>
</li>
<li anchor="case_update_perm">
<t>Update but Wrong Principal
</t>
<t>
If EXCHGID4_FLAG_UPD_CONFIRMED_REC_A is set, and the
server has the following confirmed record,
then this request is an illegal attempt at an
update by an unauthorized principal.
</t>
<t>
{ ownerid_arg, verifier_arg, old_principal_arg, clientid_ret, confirmed }
</t>
<t>
The server returns NFS4ERR_PERM and leaves the client record
intact.
</t>
</li>
</ol>
</section>
</section>
<!-- $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CREATE_SESSION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 43: CREATE_SESSION - Create New Session and Confirm Client ID</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CREATE_SESSION_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct channel_attrs4 {
count4 ca_headerpadsize;
count4 ca_maxrequestsize;
count4 ca_maxresponsesize;
count4 ca_maxresponsesize_cached;
count4 ca_maxoperations;
count4 ca_maxrequests;
uint32_t ca_rdma_ird<1>;
};
const CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_PERSIST = 0x00000001;
const CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_BACK_CHAN = 0x00000002;
const CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_RDMA = 0x00000004;
struct CREATE_SESSION4args {
clientid4 csa_clientid;
sequenceid4 csa_sequence;
uint32_t csa_flags;
channel_attrs4 csa_fore_chan_attrs;
channel_attrs4 csa_back_chan_attrs;
uint32_t csa_cb_program;
callback_sec_parms4 csa_sec_parms<>;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CREATE_SESSION_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CREATE_SESSION4resok {
sessionid4 csr_sessionid;
sequenceid4 csr_sequence;
uint32_t csr_flags;
channel_attrs4 csr_fore_chan_attrs;
channel_attrs4 csr_back_chan_attrs;
};
union CREATE_SESSION4res switch (nfsstat4 csr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
CREATE_SESSION4resok csr_resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CREATE_SESSION_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation is used by the client to create new session objects
on the server.
</t>
<t>
CREATE_SESSION can be sent with or without a preceding SEQUENCE
operation in the same COMPOUND procedure.
If CREATE_SESSION is sent with a preceding SEQUENCE
operation,
any session created by CREATE_SESSION has no direct
relation to the session specified in the SEQUENCE operation, although
the two sessions might be associated with the same client ID.
If CREATE_SESSION is sent without a preceding SEQUENCE, then it
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the only operation in the COMPOUND procedure's request. If
it is not, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP.
</t>
<t>
In addition to creating a session, CREATE_SESSION has the following
effects:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The first session created with a new
client ID serves to confirm the
creation of that
client's state on the server. The server returns the parameter
values for the new session.
</li>
<li>
The connection CREATE_SESSION that is sent over is associated with the
session's fore channel.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The arguments and results of CREATE_SESSION are described as follows:
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>csa_clientid:</dt>
<dd>
This is the client ID with which the new session will be associated.
The corresponding result is csr_sessionid, the session ID
of the new session.
</dd>
<dt>csa_sequence:</dt>
<dd>
Each client ID serializes CREATE_SESSION via a per-client ID
sequence number (see
<xref target="OP_CREATE_SESSION_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>).
The corresponding result is csr_sequence, which <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be equal to
csa_sequence.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
In the next three arguments, the client offers a value
that is to be a property of the session. Except where
stated otherwise, it is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that
the server accept the value.
If it is not acceptable, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> use a different value.
Regardless, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the value the session will
use (which will be either what the client offered, or what
the server is insisting on) to the client.
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>csa_flags:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
The csa_flags field contains a list of the following flag
bits:
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_PERSIST:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
If CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_PERSIST is set, the client
wants the server to provide a persistent reply cache.
For sessions in which only idempotent operations
will be used (e.g., a read-only session), clients
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> set CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_PERSIST. If
the server does not or cannot provide a persistent reply cache,
the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> set CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_PERSIST in
the field csr_flags.
</t>
<t>
If the server is a pNFS metadata server, for
reasons described in <xref target="obtaining_layout" format="default"/>
it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> support CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_PERSIST if it
supports the layout_hint (<xref target="attrdef_layout_hint" format="default"/>)
attribute.
</t>
</dd>
<dt>CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_BACK_CHAN:</dt>
<dd>
If CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_BACK_CHAN is set in csa_flags,
the client is requesting that the connection over which the
CREATE_SESSION operation arrived be associated with the session's
backchannel in addition to its fore channel.
If the server agrees, it
sets CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_BACK_CHAN
in the result field csr_flags. If
CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_BACK_CHAN is not set in csa_flags,
then CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_BACK_CHAN <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be set
in csr_flags.
</dd>
<dt>CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_RDMA:</dt>
<dd>
If CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_RDMA is set in csa_flags,
and if the connection over which the CREATE_SESSION operation
arrived
is currently in non-RDMA mode but
has the capability to operate in RDMA mode, then the client
is requesting that the server "step up" to RDMA mode
on the connection.
If the server agrees, it sets
CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_RDMA in the result
field csr_flags. If CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_RDMA is
not set in csa_flags, then CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_RDMA <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> be set in csr_flags.
Note that once the server agrees to step up, it and the client
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> exchange all future traffic on the connection with RPC RDMA
framing and not Record Marking (<xref target="RFC8166" format="default"/>).
</dd>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>csa_fore_chan_attrs, csa_fore_chan_attrs:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
The csa_fore_chan_attrs and csa_back_chan_attrs
fields apply to attributes of the
fore channel (which conveys
requests originating from the client to the server),
and the backchannel (the channel that conveys
callback requests originating from the
server to the client), respectively. The results are in corresponding structures
called csr_fore_chan_attrs and csr_back_chan_attrs.
The results establish attributes for each channel, and
on all subsequent use of each channel of the session.
Each structure has the following fields:
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>ca_headerpadsize:</dt>
<dd>
<t>
The maximum amount of padding the requester is willing to apply
to ensure that write payloads are aligned on some boundary at
the replier. For each channel, the server
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
will reply in ca_headerpadsize with
its preferred value,
or zero if padding is not in use, and
</li>
<li>
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> decrease this value but <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> increase it.
</li>
</ul>
</dd>
<dt>ca_maxrequestsize:</dt>
<dd>
The maximum size of a COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND request that
will be sent. This size represents the XDR encoded size of
the request, including the RPC headers (including
security flavor credentials and verifiers)
but excludes any RPC transport framing headers.
Imagine a request coming over a non-RDMA TCP/IP connection, and
that it has a single Record Marking header preceding
it. The maximum allowable
count encoded in the header will be
ca_maxrequestsize. If a requester sends
a request that exceeds ca_maxrequestsize, the error
NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG will be returned per the description in
<xref target="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" format="default"/>.
For each channel,
the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> decrease this value but <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> increase it.
</dd>
<dt>ca_maxresponsesize:</dt>
<dd>
The maximum size of a COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND reply that
the requester will
accept from the replier including RPC headers (see
the ca_maxrequestsize definition).
For each channel, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> decrease this value, but <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> increase it.
However, if the client selects a value for
ca_maxresponsesize such that a replier on a channel could
never send a response, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL in the CREATE_SESSION reply.
After the session is created, if a requester sends a
request for which the size of the reply would exceed
this value, the replier will return NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG,
per the description in
<xref target="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" format="default"/>.
</dd>
<dt>ca_maxresponsesize_cached:</dt>
<dd>
Like ca_maxresponsesize, but the maximum size of a reply
that will be stored in the reply cache
(<xref target="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" format="default"/>).
For each channel, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> decrease this
value, but <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> increase it.
If, in the reply to CREATE_SESSION, the value of
ca_maxresponsesize_cached of a channel is less than the value
of ca_maxresponsesize of the same channel, then this is an
indication to the requester that it needs to be selective
about which replies it directs the replier to cache; for
example, large replies from non-idempotent operations (e.g.,
COMPOUND requests with a READ operation) should not be
cached. The requester decides which replies to cache via an
argument to the SEQUENCE (the sa_cachethis field, see <xref target="OP_SEQUENCE" format="default"/>) or CB_SEQUENCE (the csa_cachethis
field, see <xref target="OP_CB_SEQUENCE" format="default"/>) operations.
After the session is created, if a requester sends a
request for which the size of the reply would exceed
ca_maxresponsesize_cached, the replier will return
NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE, per the description in <xref target="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" format="default"/>.
</dd>
<dt>ca_maxoperations:</dt>
<dd>
The maximum number of operations the replier
will accept in a COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND.
For the backchannel, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> change the value the
client offers. For the fore channel, the server
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> change the requested value.
After the session is created, if a requester sends a
COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND
with more operations than ca_maxoperations,
the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS.
</dd>
<dt>ca_maxrequests:</dt>
<dd>
The maximum number of concurrent COMPOUND or CB_COMPOUND
requests the requester will send on the session. Subsequent
requests will each be assigned a slot identifier by the requester
within the range zero to ca_maxrequests - 1 inclusive.
For the backchannel, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> change the value the
client offers. For the fore channel, the server
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> change the requested value.
</dd>
<dt>ca_rdma_ird:</dt>
<dd>
This array has a maximum of one element.
If this array has one element, then the element contains the
inbound RDMA read queue depth (IRD).
For each channel, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> decrease this value, but <bcp14>MUST
NOT</bcp14> increase it.
</dd></dl></dd>
<dt>csa_cb_program</dt>
<dd>
This is the ONC RPC program number the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use in
any callbacks sent through the backchannel to the client.
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> specify an ONC RPC program number equal to
csa_cb_program and an ONC RPC version number equal to 4 in
callbacks sent to the client. If a CB_COMPOUND is
sent to the client, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use a minor version
number of 1.
There is no corresponding result.
</dd>
<dt>csa_sec_parms</dt>
<dd>
<t>
The field csa_sec_parms is an array of acceptable
security credentials the server can use on
the session's backchannel. Three security
flavors are supported: AUTH_NONE, AUTH_SYS,
and RPCSEC_GSS. If AUTH_NONE is specified for
a credential, then this says the client is
authorizing the server to use AUTH_NONE on
all callbacks for the session. If AUTH_SYS
is specified, then the client is authorizing
the server to use AUTH_SYS on all callbacks,
using the credential specified cbsp_sys_cred. If
RPCSEC_GSS is specified, then the server is
allowed to use the RPCSEC_GSS context specified
in cbsp_gss_parms as the RPCSEC_GSS context in
the credential of the RPC header of callbacks
to the client.
There is no corresponding result.
</t>
<t>
The RPCSEC_GSS context for the backchannel is specified via
a pair of values of data type
gsshandle4_t. The data type gsshandle4_t represents an
RPCSEC_GSS handle, and is
precisely the same as the data type of the "handle" field of
the rpc_gss_init_res data type defined in "Context Creation Response
- Successful Acceptance", <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="of" section="5.2.3.1"/>.
</t>
<t>
The first RPCSEC_GSS handle, gcbp_handle_from_server,
is the fore handle the server returned to
the client (either in the handle field of data type
rpc_gss_init_res or as one of the elements of the spi_handles
field returned in the reply to EXCHANGE_ID) when the RPCSEC_GSS context
was created on the server. The second handle,
gcbp_handle_from_client, is the back handle to which the
client will map the RPCSEC_GSS context. The
server can immediately use the value of
gcbp_handle_from_client in the RPCSEC_GSS credential
in callback RPCs. That is, the value in
gcbp_handle_from_client can be used as the
value of the field "handle" in data type
rpc_gss_cred_t (see "Elements of
the RPCSEC_GSS Security Protocol", <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="of" section="5"/>) in callback RPCs.
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the RPCSEC_GSS security service
specified in gcbp_service, i.e., it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the
"service" field of the rpc_gss_cred_t data type in
RPCSEC_GSS credential to the value of gcbp_service (see
"RPC Request Header", <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="of" section="5.3.1"/>).
</t>
<t>
If the RPCSEC_GSS handle identified by
gcbp_handle_from_server does not exist on the server,
the server will return NFS4ERR_NOENT.
</t>
<t>
Within each element of csa_sec_parms, the fore and back RPCSEC_GSS contexts <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
share the same GSS context
and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have the same seq_window
(see Section <xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="bare" section="5.2.3.1"/>
of RFC 2203 <xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/>).
The fore and back RPCSEC_GSS context state
are independent of each other as far as the
RPCSEC_GSS sequence number (see the seq_num
field in the rpc_gss_cred_t data type of Sections
<xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="bare" section="5"/> and
<xref target="RFC2203" sectionFormat="bare" section="5.3.1"/> of
<xref target="RFC2203" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
If an RPCSEC_GSS handle is using the SSV context (see <xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>), then because each SSV RPCSEC_GSS
handle shares a common SSV GSS context, there are security
considerations specific to this situation discussed in <xref target="rpcsec_ssv_consider" format="default"/>.
</t>
</dd>
</dl>
<!-- [auth] sg check -->
<t>
Once the session is created, the first SEQUENCE or
CB_SEQUENCE received on a slot <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have a sequence
ID equal to 1; if not, the replier <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CREATE_SESSION_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
To describe a possible implementation, the same notation for client
records introduced in the description of EXCHANGE_ID is used
with the following addition:
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
clientid_arg:
The value of the csa_clientid field of the CREATE_SESSION4args
structure of the current request.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Since CREATE_SESSION is a non-idempotent operation, we
need to consider the possibility that retries may occur
as a result of a client restart, network partition,
malfunctioning router, etc. For each client ID
created by EXCHANGE_ID, the server maintains a
separate reply cache (called the CREATE_SESSION reply cache)
similar to the session reply
cache used for SEQUENCE operations, with two
distinctions.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
First, this is a reply cache just for
detecting and processing CREATE_SESSION requests for a
given client ID.
</li>
<li>
Second, the size of the client ID
reply cache is of one slot (and as a result, the
CREATE_SESSION request does not carry a slot number).
This means that at most one CREATE_SESSION request for
a given client ID can be outstanding.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
As previously stated, CREATE_SESSION can be sent with
or without a preceding SEQUENCE operation. Even if a
SEQUENCE precedes CREATE_SESSION, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
maintain the CREATE_SESSION reply cache, which
is separate from the reply cache for the session
associated with a SEQUENCE. If CREATE_SESSION was
originally sent by itself, the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> send
a retry of the CREATE_SESSION operation within a
COMPOUND preceded by a SEQUENCE. If CREATE_SESSION
was originally sent in a COMPOUND that started with a
SEQUENCE, then the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send a retry in
a COMPOUND that starts with a SEQUENCE that has the
same session ID as the SEQUENCE of the original
request. However, the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> send a retry in a
COMPOUND that either has no preceding SEQUENCE, or
has a preceding SEQUENCE that refers to a different
session than the original CREATE_SESSION. This might
be necessary if the client sends a CREATE_SESSION
in a COMPOUND preceded by a SEQUENCE with session
ID X, and session X no longer exists. Regardless, any
retry of CREATE_SESSION, with or without a preceding
SEQUENCE, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use the same value of csa_sequence
as the original.
</t>
<t>
After the client received a reply to an EXCHANGE_ID operation that contains
a new, unconfirmed client ID,
the server expects the client to follow
with a CREATE_SESSION operation to confirm the client ID. The
server expects value of csa_sequenceid in the arguments to
that CREATE_SESSION to be
to equal the value of the field eir_sequenceid that was returned in
results of the EXCHANGE_ID that returned the unconfirmed
client ID.
Before the server replies to that EXCHANGE_ID operation,
it initializes the client ID slot to be equal
to eir_sequenceid - 1 (accounting for underflow),
and records a contrived CREATE_SESSION result
with a "cached" result of NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED.
With the client ID slot thus initialized, the processing of the
CREATE_SESSION operation is divided into four phases:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
Client record look up. The server looks up the client ID
in its client record table.
If the server contains no records
with client ID equal to clientid_arg, then most
likely the client's state has been purged during a
period of inactivity, possibly due to a loss of
connectivity. NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID is returned,
and no changes are made to any client records on
the server. Otherwise, the server goes to phase 2.
</li>
<li>
Sequence ID processing. If csa_sequenceid is equal to the
sequence ID in the client ID's slot, then this is a replay
of the previous CREATE_SESSION request, and the server
returns the cached result.
If csa_sequenceid is not equal to the sequence ID in the slot,
and is more than one greater (accounting for wraparound),
then the server returns the error NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED,
and does not change the slot. If csa_sequenceid is
equal to the slot's sequence ID + 1 (accounting for
wraparound), then the slot's sequence ID is set to
csa_sequenceid, and the CREATE_SESSION processing goes to
the next phase. A subsequent new CREATE_SESSION call
over the same client ID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
use a csa_sequenceid that is one greater than the
sequence ID in the slot.
</li>
<li>
<t>
Client ID confirmation. If this would be the first session for the
client ID, the CREATE_SESSION operation serves to confirm the
client ID.
Otherwise,
the client ID confirmation phase is skipped and only
the session creation phase occurs.
Any case in which there is more than one
record with identical values for client ID represents
a server implementation error.
Operation in the
potential valid cases is summarized as follows.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>Successful Confirmation
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
If the server has the following unconfirmed record, then this
is the expected confirmation of an unconfirmed record.
</li>
<li>
{ ownerid, verifier, principal_arg, clientid_arg, unconfirmed }
</li>
<li>
As noted in <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>,
the server might also have the following confirmed record.
</li>
<li>
{ ownerid, old_verifier, principal_arg, old_clientid, confirmed }
</li>
<li>
The server schedules the replacement of both records with:
</li>
<li>
{ ownerid, verifier, principal_arg, clientid_arg, confirmed }
</li>
<li>
The processing of CREATE_SESSION continues on to session creation.
Once the session is successfully created, the scheduled client
record replacement is committed. If the session is not
successfully created, then no changes are made to any client
records on the server.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<t>Unsuccessful Confirmation
</t>
<ul empty="true" spacing="normal">
<li>
If the server has the following record, then the client has
changed principals after the previous EXCHANGE_ID request,
or there has been a chance collision between shorthand client
identifiers.
</li>
<li>
{ *, *, old_principal_arg, clientid_arg, * }
</li>
<li>
Neither of these cases is permissible. Processing stops and
NFS4ERR_CLID_INUSE is returned to the client. No changes are
made to any client records on the server.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Session creation.
The server confirmed the client ID, either in this
CREATE_SESSION operation, or a previous CREATE_SESSION
operation.
The server examines the remaining fields of the arguments.
</t>
<t>
The server creates the session by recording the
parameter values used (including whether the
CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_PERSIST flag is set and has
been accepted by the server) and allocating space
for the session reply cache (if there is not enough
space, the server returns NFS4ERR_NOSPC). For each slot in the
reply cache, the server sets the sequence ID to zero,
and records an entry containing a COMPOUND
reply with zero operations and the error
NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED. This way, if the first
SEQUENCE request sent has a sequence ID equal to
zero, the server can simply return what is in the
reply cache: NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED. The client
initializes its reply cache for receiving callbacks
in the same way, and similarly, the first CB_SEQUENCE
operation on a slot after session creation <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> have
a sequence ID of one.
</t>
<t>
If the session state is created successfully, the server associates
the session with the client ID provided by the client.
</t>
<t>
When a request that had CREATE_SESSION4_FLAG_CONN_RDMA set
needs to be retried, the retry
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be done on a new connection that is in non-RDMA mode.
If properties of the new connection are different enough
that the arguments to CREATE_SESSION need to change, then
a non-retry <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be sent. The server will eventually dispose
of any session that was created on the original connection.
</t>
</li>
</ol>
<t>
On the backchannel, the client and server might wish to
have many slots, in some cases perhaps more that the fore channel, in
order to deal with the situations where the
network link has high latency and is the primary
bottleneck for response to recalls. If so, and if the
client provides too few slots to the backchannel,
the server might limit the number of recallable
objects it gives to the client.
</t>
<t>
Implementing RPCSEC_GSS callback support requires
changes to both the client and server implementations of
RPCSEC_GSS. One possible set of changes includes:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Adding a data structure that wraps the GSS-API
context with a reference count.
</li>
<li>
New functions to increment and decrement the reference
count. If the reference count is decremented to zero,
the wrapper data structure and the GSS-API context it
refers to would be freed.
</li>
<li>
Change RPCSEC_GSS to create the wrapper data
structure upon receiving GSS-API context from
gss_accept_sec_context() and gss_init_sec_context().
The reference count would be initialized to 1.
</li>
<li>
Adding a function to map an existing
RPCSEC_GSS handle to a pointer to the wrapper data
structure. The reference count would be incremented.
</li>
<li>
Adding a function to create a new RPCSEC_GSS
handle from a pointer to the wrapper data structure.
The reference count would be incremented.
</li>
<li>
Replacing calls from RPCSEC_GSS that free GSS-API
contexts, with calls to decrement the reference count
on the wrapper data structure.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_DESTROY_SESSION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 44: DESTROY_SESSION - Destroy a Session</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DESTROY_SESSION_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct DESTROY_SESSION4args {
sessionid4 dsa_sessionid;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DESTROY_SESSION_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct DESTROY_SESSION4res {
nfsstat4 dsr_status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DESTROY_SESSION_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The DESTROY_SESSION operation closes the session and discards
the session's reply cache, if any.
Any remaining connections associated with the session are
immediately disassociated. If the connection has no remaining
associated sessions, the connection
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be closed by the server.
Locks, delegations, layouts, wants, and the lease, which are all
tied to the client ID, are not affected by DESTROY_SESSION.
</t>
<t>
DESTROY_SESSION <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be invoked on a connection that
is associated with the session being destroyed.
In addition, if SP4_MACH_CRED state protection
was specified when the client ID was created,
the RPCSEC_GSS principal that created the session <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
the one that destroys the session, using RPCSEC_GSS
privacy or integrity. If SP4_SSV state protection was
specified when the client ID was created, RPCSEC_GSS
using the SSV mechanism (<xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>)
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used, with integrity or privacy.
</t>
<t>
If the COMPOUND request starts with SEQUENCE, and
if the sessionids specified in SEQUENCE and DESTROY_SESSION
are the same, then
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
DESTROY_SESSION <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the final operation in the COMPOUND
request.
</li>
<li>
It is advisable to avoid placing DESTROY_SESSION in a
COMPOUND request with other state-modifying
operations, because the DESTROY_SESSION will destroy
the reply cache.
</li>
<li>
Because the session and its reply cache are destroyed, a client that
retries the request may receive an error in
reply to the retry, even though the original request was
successful.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the COMPOUND request starts with SEQUENCE, and
if the sessionids specified in SEQUENCE and DESTROY_SESSION
are different, then DESTROY_SESSION can appear in any position
of the COMPOUND request (except for the first position). The
two sessionids can belong to different client IDs.
</t>
<t>
If the COMPOUND request does not start with
SEQUENCE, and if DESTROY_SESSION is not the
sole operation, then server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP.
</t>
<t>
If there is a backchannel on the session and the
server has outstanding CB_COMPOUND operations for the
session which have not been replied to, then the server
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> refuse to destroy the session and return an error.
If so, then
in the event the backchannel is down, the server
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_CB_PATH_DOWN to inform the
client that the backchannel needs to be repaired before
the server will allow the session to be destroyed.
Otherwise, the error CB_BACK_CHAN_BUSY <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be
returned to indicate that there are CB_COMPOUNDs
that need to be replied to. The client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> reply
to all outstanding CB_COMPOUNDs before re-sending
DESTROY_SESSION.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_FREE_STATEID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 45: FREE_STATEID - Free Stateid with No Locks</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_FREE_STATEID_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct FREE_STATEID4args {
stateid4 fsa_stateid;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_FREE_STATID_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct FREE_STATEID4res {
nfsstat4 fsr_status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_FREE_STATEID4_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The FREE_STATEID operation is used to free a stateid that no longer
has any associated locks (including opens, byte-range locks, delegations,
and layouts). This may be because of client LOCKU operations or because
of server revocation. If there are valid locks (of any kind)
associated with the stateid in question, the error NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD
will be returned, and the associated stateid will not be freed.
</t>
<t>
When a stateid is freed that had been associated with revoked locks,
by sending the FREE_STATEID operation, the client acknowledges the loss of those
locks. This allows the server, once all such revoked state is
acknowledged,
to allow that client again to reclaim locks, without encountering
the edge conditions discussed in <xref target="server_failure" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Once a successful FREE_STATEID is done for a given stateid, any
subsequent use of that stateid will result in an NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID
error.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 46: GET_DIR_DELEGATION - Get a Directory Delegation</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
typedef nfstime4 attr_notice4;
struct GET_DIR_DELEGATION4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: delegated directory */
bool gdda_signal_deleg_avail;
bitmap4 gdda_notification_types;
attr_notice4 gdda_child_attr_delay;
attr_notice4 gdda_dir_attr_delay;
bitmap4 gdda_child_attributes;
bitmap4 gdda_dir_attributes;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct GET_DIR_DELEGATION4resok {
verifier4 gddr_cookieverf;
/* Stateid for get_dir_delegation */
stateid4 gddr_stateid;
/* Which notifications can the server support */
bitmap4 gddr_notification;
bitmap4 gddr_child_attributes;
bitmap4 gddr_dir_attributes;
};
enum gddrnf4_status {
GDD4_OK = 0,
GDD4_UNAVAIL = 1
};
union GET_DIR_DELEGATION4res_non_fatal
switch (gddrnf4_status gddrnf_status) {
case GDD4_OK:
GET_DIR_DELEGATION4resok gddrnf_resok4;
case GDD4_UNAVAIL:
bool gddrnf_will_signal_deleg_avail;
};
union GET_DIR_DELEGATION4res
switch (nfsstat4 gddr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
GET_DIR_DELEGATION4res_non_fatal gddr_res_non_fatal4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The GET_DIR_DELEGATION operation is used by a client to request
a directory delegation. The directory is represented by the
current filehandle. The client also specifies whether it wants
the server to notify it when the directory changes in certain
ways by setting one or more bits in a bitmap. The server may
refuse to grant the delegation. In that case, the server
will return NFS4ERR_DIRDELEG_UNAVAIL. If the server decides to
hand out the delegation, it will return a cookie verifier for
that directory. If the cookie verifier changes when the client
is holding the delegation, the delegation will be recalled
unless the client has asked for notification for this event.
</t>
<t>
The server will also return a directory delegation stateid,
gddr_stateid, as a result of the
GET_DIR_DELEGATION operation. This stateid will appear in
callback messages related to the delegation, such as
notifications and delegation recalls. The client will use this
stateid to return the delegation voluntarily or upon recall. A
delegation is returned by calling the DELEGRETURN operation.
</t>
<t>
The server might not be able to support notifications of certain
events. If the client asks for such notifications, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> inform the client of its inability to do so as part of the
GET_DIR_DELEGATION reply by not setting the appropriate bits in
the supported notifications bitmask, gddr_notification, contained
in the reply. The server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> add bits to gddr_notification
that the client did not request.
</t>
<t>
The GET_DIR_DELEGATION operation can be used for both normal and
named attribute directories.
</t>
<t>
If client sets gdda_signal_deleg_avail to TRUE, then it is
registering with the client a "want" for a directory
delegation. If the delegation is not available, and the server
supports and will honor the "want",
the results will have gddrnf_will_signal_deleg_avail set to TRUE
and no error will be indicated on return.
If so, the client should expect a future CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL
operation to indicate that a directory delegation is available.
If the server does not wish to honor the "want" or is not able
to do so, it returns the error NFS4ERR_DIRDELEG_UNAVAIL. If the
delegation is immediately available, the server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return it with
the response to the operation, rather than via a callback.
</t>
<t>
When a client makes a request for a
directory delegation while it already holds
a directory delegation for that directory
(including the case where it has been
recalled but not yet returned by the client
or revoked by the server), the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
reply with the value of gddr_status set to
NFS4_OK, the value of gddrnf_status set to
GDD4_UNAVAIL, and the value of
gddrnf_will_signal_deleg_avail set to
FALSE. The delegation the client held
before the request remains intact, and its
state is unchanged. The current stateid is
not changed (see <xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/> for a description
of the current stateid).
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GET_DIR_DELEGATION_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
Directory delegations provide the benefit of improving cache
consistency of namespace information. This is done through
synchronous callbacks. A server must support synchronous
callbacks in order to support directory delegations. In addition
to that, asynchronous notifications provide a way to reduce
network traffic as well as improve client performance in certain
conditions.
</t>
<t>
Notifications are specified in terms of potential
changes to the directory. A client can ask to be
notified of events by setting one or more
bits in gdda_notification_types.
The client can ask for notifications on addition of entries
to a directory (by setting the
NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY in gdda_notification_types),
notifications on entry removal
(NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY), renames
(NOTIFY4_RENAME_ENTRY), directory attribute
changes (NOTIFY4_CHANGE_DIR_ATTRIBUTES),
and cookie verifier changes
(NOTIFY4_CHANGE_COOKIE_VERIFIER) by setting
one or more corresponding bits in the
gdda_notification_types field.
</t>
<t>
The client can also ask for
notifications of changes to
attributes of directory entries
(NOTIFY4_CHANGE_CHILD_ATTRIBUTES)
in order to keep its attribute cache up to date. However, any
changes made to child attributes do not cause the delegation to
be recalled. If a client is interested in directory entry
caching or negative name caching, it can set the
gdda_notification_types appropriately to its particular need
and the server will notify it of
all changes that would otherwise invalidate its name cache. The
kind of notification a client asks for may depend on the
directory size, its rate of change, and the applications being
used to access that directory. The enumeration of the conditions under
which a client might ask for a notification is out of the scope
of this specification.
</t>
<t>
For attribute notifications, the client
will set bits in the gdda_dir_attributes
bitmap to indicate which attributes
it wants to be notified of. If the server does not support
notifications for changes to a certain attribute, it <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>
set that attribute in the supported attribute bitmap
specified in the reply (gddr_dir_attributes). The client will
also set in the gdda_child_attributes bitmap the attributes
of directory entries it wants to be notified of, and
the server will indicate in gddr_child_attributes which
attributes of directory entries it will notify the client of.
</t>
<t>
The client will also let the server know if
it wants to get the notification as soon as the attribute change
occurs or after a certain delay by setting a delay factor;
gdda_child_attr_delay is for attribute changes to directory entries and
gdda_dir_attr_delay is for attribute changes to the directory. If this
delay factor is set to zero, that indicates to the server that
the client wants to be notified of any attribute changes as soon
as they occur. If the delay factor is set to N seconds, the server will
make a best-effort guarantee that attribute updates are
synchronized within N seconds.
If the client asks
for a delay factor that the server does not support or that may
cause significant resource consumption on the server by causing
the server to send a lot of notifications, the server should not
commit to sending out notifications for attributes and
therefore must not set the appropriate bit in the
gddr_child_attributes and gddr_dir_attributes bitmaps in the response.
</t>
<t>
The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use a security tuple (<xref target="NFSv4_Security_Tuples" format="default"/>) that the
directory or its applicable ancestor (<xref target="Security_Service_Negotiation" format="default"/>) is
exported with. If not, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC to the operation that both precedes
GET_DIR_DELEGATION and sets the current filehandle
(see <xref target="using_secinfo" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The directory delegation covers all the entries in the
directory except the parent entry. That means if a directory and
its parent both hold directory delegations, any changes to the
parent will not cause a notification to be sent for the child
even though the child's parent entry points to the parent
directory.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_GETDEVICEINFO" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 47: GETDEVICEINFO - Get Device Information</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETDEVICEINFO_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct GETDEVICEINFO4args {
deviceid4 gdia_device_id;
layouttype4 gdia_layout_type;
count4 gdia_maxcount;
bitmap4 gdia_notify_types;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETDEVICEINFO_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct GETDEVICEINFO4resok {
device_addr4 gdir_device_addr;
bitmap4 gdir_notification;
};
union GETDEVICEINFO4res switch (nfsstat4 gdir_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
GETDEVICEINFO4resok gdir_resok4;
case NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL:
count4 gdir_mincount;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETDEVICEINFO_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The GETDEVICEINFO operation returns pNFS storage device address
information for the specified device ID.
The client identifies the device information to be returned by
providing the gdia_device_id and gdia_layout_type that uniquely
identify the device. The client provides gdia_maxcount
to limit the number of bytes for the result. This maximum size
represents all of the data being returned within the
GETDEVICEINFO4resok structure and includes the XDR overhead.
The server may return less data. If the server is unable to
return any information within the gdia_maxcount limit, the error
NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL will be returned. However, if gdia_maxcount is
zero, NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be returned.
</t>
<t>
The da_layout_type field of the gdir_device_addr returned
by the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be equal to the gdia_layout_type specified
by the client. If it is not equal, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> ignore
the response as invalid and behave as if the server returned
an error, even if the client does have support for the
layout type returned.
</t>
<t>
The client also provides a notification bitmap,
gdia_notify_types, for the device ID mapping
notification for which it is interested in receiving;
the server must support device ID notifications
for the notification request to have affect.
The notification mask is composed in the same
manner as the bitmap for file attributes (<xref target="fattr4" format="default"/>). The numbers of bit positions
are listed in the notify_device_type4 enumeration type
(<xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" format="default"/>). Only
two enumerated values of notify_device_type4 currently
apply to GETDEVICEINFO:
NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE
and NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE (see <xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The notification bitmap applies only to the specified device ID.
If a client sends a GETDEVICEINFO operation on a deviceID multiple times,
the last notification bitmap is used by the server for
subsequent notifications. If the bitmap is zero or empty,
then the device ID's notifications are turned off.
</t>
<t>
If the client wants to just update or turn off notifications,
it <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> send a GETDEVICEINFO operation with gdia_maxcount set to zero.
In that event, if the device ID is valid, the reply's da_addr_body
field of the gdir_device_addr field will be of zero length.
</t>
<t>
If an unknown device ID is given in gdia_device_id,
the server returns NFS4ERR_NOENT.
Otherwise, the device address
information is returned in gdir_device_addr.
Finally, if the server supports
notifications for device ID mappings, the gdir_notification
result will contain a bitmap of which notifications
it will actually send to the client (via CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
see <xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
If NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL is returned, the results also contain
gdir_mincount. The value of gdir_mincount represents the
minimum size necessary to obtain the device information.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETDEVICEINFO_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
Aside from updating or turning off notifications, another
use case for gdia_maxcount being set to zero is to validate
a device ID.
</t>
<t>
The client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> request a notification for changes or
deletion of a device ID to device address mapping so
that the server can allow the client gracefully use a
new mapping, without having pending I/O fail abruptly,
or force layouts using the device ID to be recalled
or revoked.
</t>
<t>
It is possible that GETDEVICEINFO (and
GETDEVICELIST) will race with CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID,
i.e., CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID arrives before the client
gets and processes the response to GETDEVICEINFO or
GETDEVICELIST. The analysis of the race leverages the
fact that the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> delete a device ID that
is referred to by a layout the client has.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID deletes a device ID.
If the client believes it has layouts that refer to the
device ID, then it is possible that layouts referring to
the deleted device ID have been revoked.
The client should send a TEST_STATEID request using the
stateid for each layout that might have been revoked. If
TEST_STATEID indicates that any layouts have been revoked, the
client must recover from layout revocation as described in
<xref target="revoke_layout" format="default"/>. If TEST_STATEID indicates that at least
one layout has not been revoked, the client should send
a GETDEVICEINFO operation on the supposedly deleted
device ID to verify that the device ID
has been deleted.
</t>
<t>
If GETDEVICEINFO indicates that the device ID
does not exist, then the client assumes the server is faulty
and recovers by sending an EXCHANGE_ID operation. If GETDEVICEINFO
indicates that the device ID does exist, then while the server is
faulty for sending an erroneous device ID deletion notification,
the degree to which it is faulty does not require the client to
create a new client ID.
</t>
<t>
If the client does not have layouts that refer to the
device ID, no harm is done.
The client should mark the device ID as deleted, and when
GETDEVICEINFO or GETDEVICELIST results are
received that indicate that the device ID has been
in fact deleted, the device ID should be removed from the
client's cache.
</t>
</li>
<li>
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID indicates that a device ID's device
addressing mappings have changed. The client should assume
that the results from the in-progress GETDEVICEINFO
will be stale for the device ID
once received, and so it should send another GETDEVICEINFO
on the device ID.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_GETDEVICELIST" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 48: GETDEVICELIST - Get All Device Mappings for a File System</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETDEVICELIST_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct GETDEVICELIST4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: object belonging to the file system */
layouttype4 gdla_layout_type;
/* number of deviceIDs to return */
count4 gdla_maxdevices;
nfs_cookie4 gdla_cookie;
verifier4 gdla_cookieverf;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETDEVICELIST_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct GETDEVICELIST4resok {
nfs_cookie4 gdlr_cookie;
verifier4 gdlr_cookieverf;
deviceid4 gdlr_deviceid_list<>;
bool gdlr_eof;
};
union GETDEVICELIST4res switch (nfsstat4 gdlr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
GETDEVICELIST4resok gdlr_resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETDEVICELIST_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation is used by the client to enumerate all of the
device IDs that a server's file system uses.
</t>
<t>
The client provides a current filehandle of a file object that
belongs to the file system (i.e., all file objects sharing the same
fsid as that of the current filehandle) and the layout type
in gdia_layout_type. Since
this operation might require multiple calls to enumerate all the
device IDs (and is thus
similar to the <xref target="OP_READDIR" format="default">
READDIR</xref> operation), the client also provides gdia_cookie
and gdia_cookieverf to specify the current cursor position in the
list. When the client wants to read from the beginning of the
file system's device mappings, it sets gdla_cookie to zero. The
field gdla_cookieverf <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the server when
gdla_cookie is zero.
The client provides gdla_maxdevices to limit the number of device IDs
in the result. If gdla_maxdevices is zero, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_INVAL.
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return fewer device IDs.
</t>
<t>
The successful response to the operation will contain the
cookie, gdlr_cookie, and the cookie verifier, gdlr_cookieverf, to be
used on the subsequent GETDEVICELIST. A gdlr_eof value of TRUE
signifies that there are no remaining entries in the server's
device list. Each element of gdlr_deviceid_list contains
a device ID.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_GETDEVICELIST_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
An example of the use of this operation is for pNFS
clients and servers that use LAYOUT4_BLOCK_VOLUME
layouts. In these environments it may be helpful
for a client to determine device accessibility upon
first file system access.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 49: LAYOUTCOMMIT - Commit Writes Made Using a Layout</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union newtime4 switch (bool nt_timechanged) {
case TRUE:
nfstime4 nt_time;
case FALSE:
void;
};
union newoffset4 switch (bool no_newoffset) {
case TRUE:
offset4 no_offset;
case FALSE:
void;
};
struct LAYOUTCOMMIT4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
offset4 loca_offset;
length4 loca_length;
bool loca_reclaim;
stateid4 loca_stateid;
newoffset4 loca_last_write_offset;
newtime4 loca_time_modify;
layoutupdate4 loca_layoutupdate;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union newsize4 switch (bool ns_sizechanged) {
case TRUE:
length4 ns_size;
case FALSE:
void;
};
struct LAYOUTCOMMIT4resok {
newsize4 locr_newsize;
};
union LAYOUTCOMMIT4res switch (nfsstat4 locr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
LAYOUTCOMMIT4resok locr_resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The LAYOUTCOMMIT operation commits changes in the layout represented by the current
filehandle, client ID (derived from the session ID in the
preceding SEQUENCE operation), byte-range, and stateid. Since
layouts are sub-dividable, a smaller portion of a layout,
retrieved via LAYOUTGET, can be committed. The byte-range being
committed is specified through the byte-range (loca_offset and
loca_length). This byte-range <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> overlap with one or more existing layouts
previously granted via LAYOUTGET (<xref target="OP_LAYOUTGET" format="default"/>),
each with an iomode of LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW. In the
case where the iomode of any held layout segment is not
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW, the server should return the error
NFS4ERR_BAD_IOMODE. For the case where the client
does not hold matching layout segment(s) for the
defined byte-range, the server should return the error
NFS4ERR_BAD_LAYOUT.
</t>
<t>
The LAYOUTCOMMIT operation indicates that the client has
completed writes using a layout obtained by a previous
LAYOUTGET. The client may have only written a subset of the
data range it previously requested. LAYOUTCOMMIT allows it to
commit or discard provisionally allocated space and to update
the server with a new end-of-file. The layout referenced by
LAYOUTCOMMIT is still valid after the operation completes and
can be continued to be referenced by the client ID, filehandle,
byte-range, layout type, and stateid.
</t>
<t>
If the loca_reclaim field is set to TRUE, this indicates that
the client is attempting to commit changes to a layout after the
restart of the metadata server during the metadata server's
recovery grace period (see <xref target="mds_recovery" format="default"/>). This type of request may be necessary
when the client has uncommitted writes to provisionally
allocated byte-ranges of a file that were sent to the storage
devices before the restart of the metadata server. In this case,
the layout provided by the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a subset of a writable
layout that the client held immediately before the restart of the
metadata server. The value of the field loca_stateid <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
be a value that the metadata server returned before it restarted.
The metadata server is free to accept or
reject this request based on its own internal metadata
consistency checks. If the metadata server finds that the
layout provided by the client does not pass its consistency
checks, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reject the request with the status
NFS4ERR_RECLAIM_BAD. The successful completion of the
LAYOUTCOMMIT request with loca_reclaim set to TRUE does NOT
provide the client with a layout for the file. It simply
commits the changes to the layout specified in the
loca_layoutupdate field. To obtain a layout for the file, the
client must send a LAYOUTGET request to the server after the
server's grace period has expired. If the metadata server
receives a LAYOUTCOMMIT request with loca_reclaim set to TRUE
when the metadata server is not in its recovery grace period, it
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reject the request with the status NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE.
</t>
<t>
Setting the loca_reclaim field to TRUE is required if and only
if the committed layout was acquired before the metadata server
restart. If the client is committing a layout that was acquired
during the metadata server's grace period, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the
"reclaim" field to FALSE.
</t>
<t>
The loca_stateid is a layout stateid value as
returned by previously successful layout operations
(see <xref target="layout_stateid" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The loca_last_write_offset field specifies the offset of the
last byte written by the client previous to the LAYOUTCOMMIT.
Note that this value is never equal to the file's size (at most
it is one byte less than the file's size) and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be less than
or equal to NFS4_MAXFILEOFF. Also, loca_last_write_offset <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
overlap the range described by loca_offset and loca_length.
The metadata server
may use this information to determine whether the file's size
needs to be updated. If the metadata server updates the file's
size as the result of the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation, it must return
the new size (locr_newsize.ns_size) as part of the results.
</t>
<t>
The loca_time_modify field
allows the client to suggest a modification time it would like the metadata
server to set. The metadata server may use the suggestion or
it may use the time of the LAYOUTCOMMIT operation to set the modification
time. If the metadata server uses the client-provided
modification time, it should ensure that time does not flow backwards. If the
client wants to force the metadata server to set an exact time,
the client should use a SETATTR operation in a COMPOUND right
after LAYOUTCOMMIT. See <xref target="committing_layout" format="default"/> for
more details. If the client desires the resultant modification time,
it should construct the COMPOUND so that a GETATTR
follows the LAYOUTCOMMIT.
</t>
<t>
The loca_layoutupdate argument to LAYOUTCOMMIT provides a mechanism
for a client to provide layout-specific updates to the metadata
server. For example, the layout update can describe what byte-ranges
of the original layout have been used and what byte-ranges can be
deallocated. There is no NFSv4.1 file layout-specific layoutupdate4
structure.
</t>
<t>
The layout information is more verbose for block devices than for
objects and files because the latter two hide the details of block
allocation behind their storage protocols. At the minimum, the
client needs to communicate changes to the end-of-file location back
to the server, and, if desired, its view of the file's modification
time. For block/volume layouts, it needs to specify precisely
which blocks have been used.
</t>
<t>
If the layout identified in the arguments does not exist, the
error NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT is returned. The layout being committed
may also be rejected if it does not correspond to an existing
layout with an iomode of LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value and the
current stateid retains its value.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> also use LAYOUTCOMMIT with the
loca_reclaim field set to TRUE to convey hints to modified file
attributes or to report layout-type specific information such as
I/O errors for object-based storage layouts, as normally done
during normal operation. Doing so may help the metadata server
to recover files more efficiently after restart. For example,
some file system implementations may require expansive recovery
of file system objects if the metadata server does not get a
positive indication from all clients holding a LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW layout that
they have successfully completed all their writes. Sending a
LAYOUTCOMMIT (if required) and then following with LAYOUTRETURN
can provide such an indication and allow for graceful and
efficient recovery.
</t>
<t>
If loca_reclaim is TRUE, the metadata server is free to
either examine or ignore the value in the field loca_stateid.
The metadata server implementation might or might not
encode in its layout
stateid information that allows the metadate server to
perform a consistency check on the LAYOUTCOMMIT request.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LAYOUTGET" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 50: LAYOUTGET - Get Layout Information</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTGET_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LAYOUTGET4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
bool loga_signal_layout_avail;
layouttype4 loga_layout_type;
layoutiomode4 loga_iomode;
offset4 loga_offset;
length4 loga_length;
length4 loga_minlength;
stateid4 loga_stateid;
count4 loga_maxcount;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTGET_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct LAYOUTGET4resok {
bool logr_return_on_close;
stateid4 logr_stateid;
layout4 logr_layout<>;
};
union LAYOUTGET4res switch (nfsstat4 logr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
LAYOUTGET4resok logr_resok4;
case NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER:
bool logr_will_signal_layout_avail;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTGET_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The LAYOUTGET operation requests a layout from the metadata server for reading or
writing the file given by the filehandle at the
byte-range specified by offset and length. Layouts are
identified by the client ID (derived from the session ID in the
preceding SEQUENCE operation), current filehandle, layout type
(loga_layout_type), and the layout stateid (loga_stateid). The
use of the loga_iomode field depends upon the layout type, but should
reflect the client's data access intent.
</t>
<t>
If the metadata server is in a grace period, and does not
persist layouts and device ID to device address mappings, then
it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_GRACE (see <xref target="reclaim_locks" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The LAYOUTGET operation returns layout information
for the specified byte-range: a layout.
The client actually specifies two ranges, both starting
at the offset in the loga_offset field. The first
range is between loga_offset and loga_offset + loga_length - 1
inclusive. This range indicates the desired range the client
wants the layout to cover. The second range is between
loga_offset and loga_offset + loga_minlength - 1 inclusive. This
range indicates the required range the client needs the layout
to cover. Thus, loga_minlength <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be less than or equal to
loga_length.
</t>
<t>
When a length field is set to NFS4_UINT64_MAX,
this indicates a desire (when loga_length is NFS4_UINT64_MAX)
or requirement (when loga_minlength is NFS4_UINT64_MAX)
to get a layout from loga_offset through the
end-of-file, regardless of the file's length.
</t>
<t>
The following rules govern the relationships among,
and the minima of,
loga_length, loga_minlength, and loga_offset.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If loga_length is less than loga_minlength, the metadata server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</li>
<li>
If loga_minlength is zero, this is an indication
to the metadata server that the client desires any layout
at offset loga_offset or less that the metadata server has
"readily available". Readily is subjective, and depends on
the layout type and the pNFS server implementation. For example,
some metadata servers might have to pre-allocate stable
storage when they receive a request for a range of a
file that goes beyond the file's current length.
If loga_minlength is zero and
loga_length is greater than zero, this tells the
metadata server what range of the layout the client would
prefer to have. If loga_length and loga_minlength
are both zero, then the client is indicating that it desires
a layout of any length with the ending offset of the range
no less than the value specified loga_offset, and the starting offset at or
below loga_offset. If the metadata server does not have
a layout that is readily available, then it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER.
</li>
<li>
If the sum of loga_offset and loga_minlength exceeds
NFS4_UINT64_MAX, and loga_minlength is not NFS4_UINT64_MAX,
the error NFS4ERR_INVAL <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> result.
</li>
<li>
If the sum of loga_offset and loga_length exceeds
NFS4_UINT64_MAX, and loga_length is not NFS4_UINT64_MAX,
the error NFS4ERR_INVAL <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> result.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
After the metadata server has performed the above checks on loga_offset,
loga_minlength, and loga_offset, the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return a
layout according to the rules in <xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Acceptable layouts based on loga_minlength.
Note: u64m = NFS4_UINT64_MAX; a_off = loga_offset;
a_minlen = loga_minlength.
</t>
<table anchor="layout_hell" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Layout iomode of request</th>
<th align="left">Layout a_minlen of request</th>
<th align="left">Layout iomode of reply</th>
<th align="left">Layout offset of reply</th>
<th align="left">Layout length of reply</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _READ</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &gt;= file length - layout offset</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be u64m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">&gt; 0 and &lt; u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _READ</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &gt;= MIN(file length, a_minlen + a_off) - layout offset</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">&gt; 0 and &lt; u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &gt;= a_off - layout offset + a_minlen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _READ</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &gt; 0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &gt; 0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_RW</td>
<td align="left">u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be u64m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_RW</td>
<td align="left">&gt; 0 and &lt; u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &gt;= a_off - layout offset + a_minlen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_RW</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &gt; 0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
If loga_minlength is not zero and the metadata server cannot return a layout according
to the rules in <xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>,
then the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the error
NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT. If loga_minlength is zero and the metadata server
cannot or will not return a layout according
to the rules in <xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>,
then the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return the error
NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER.
Assuming that loga_length is greater
than loga_minlength or equal to zero, the metadata server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
return a layout according to the rules in <xref target="layout_hell2" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Desired layouts based on loga_length.
The rules of <xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/> <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be applied first.
Note: u64m = NFS4_UINT64_MAX; a_off = loga_offset;
a_len = loga_length.
</t>
<table anchor="layout_hell2" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Layout iomode of request</th>
<th align="left">Layout a_len of request</th>
<th align="left">Layout iomode of reply</th>
<th align="left">Layout offset of reply</th>
<th align="left">Layout length of reply</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _READ</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be u64m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be u64m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">&gt; 0 and &lt; u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _READ</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &gt;= a_off - layout offset + a_len</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">&gt; 0 and &lt; u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &gt;= a_off - layout offset + a_len</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _READ</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &gt; a_off - layout offset</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_READ</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be _READ</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &gt; a_off - layout offset</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_RW</td>
<td align="left">u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be u64m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_RW</td>
<td align="left">&gt; 0 and &lt; u64m</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &gt;= a_off - layout offset + a_len</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">_RW</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be _RW</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be &lt;= a_off</td>
<td align="left"><bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be &gt; a_off - layout offset</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
The loga_stateid field specifies a valid stateid.
If a layout is not currently held by the client,
the loga_stateid field represents a stateid
reflecting the correspondingly valid open,
byte-range lock, or delegation stateid. Once a
layout is held on the file by the client, the
loga_stateid field <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be a stateid as returned from
a previous LAYOUTGET or LAYOUTRETURN operation or
provided by a CB_LAYOUTRECALL operation (see <xref target="layout_stateid" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The loga_maxcount field specifies the maximum layout size (in bytes)
that the client can handle. If the size of the layout structure
exceeds the size specified by maxcount, the metadata server will
return the NFS4ERR_TOOSMALL error.
</t>
<t>
The returned layout is expressed as an array,
logr_layout, with each element of type layout4. If a
file has a single striping pattern, then logr_layout
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> contain just one entry. Otherwise, if the
requested range overlaps more than one striping
pattern, logr_layout will contain the required number
of entries. The elements of logr_layout <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be sorted
in ascending order of the value of the lo_offset field
of each element. There <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be no gaps or overlaps
in the range between two successive elements of
logr_layout. The lo_iomode field in each element of
logr_layout <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same.
</t>
<t>
<xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>
and
<xref target="layout_hell2" format="default"/>
both refer to a returned layout iomode, offset, and length.
Because the returned layout is encoded in the logr_layout array,
more description is required.
</t>
<dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
<dt>iomode</dt>
<dd>
The value of the returned layout iomode listed in
<xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>
and
<xref target="layout_hell2" format="default"/>
is equal to the value of the lo_iomode field in each
element of logr_layout.
As shown in <xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>
and <xref target="layout_hell2" format="default"/>,
the metadata server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return a layout with an lo_iomode
different from the requested iomode (field loga_iomode of the request).
If it does so, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
ensure that the lo_iomode is more permissive than the
loga_iomode requested. For example, this behavior allows an
implementation to upgrade LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ requests to LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW
requests at its discretion, within the limits of the layout type
specific protocol. A lo_iomode of either LAYOUTIOMODE4_READ or
LAYOUTIOMODE4_RW <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned.
</dd>
<dt>offset</dt>
<dd>
The value of the returned layout offset listed in
<xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>
and
<xref target="layout_hell2" format="default"/>
is always equal to the lo_offset field of the first
element logr_layout.
</dd>
<dt>length</dt>
<dd>
<t>
When setting the value of the returned layout
length, the situation is complicated by the
possibility that the special layout length value
NFS4_UINT64_MAX is involved. For a logr_layout
array of N elements, the lo_length field in the
first N-1 elements <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be NFS4_UINT64_MAX. The
lo_length field of the last element of logr_layout
can be NFS4_UINT64_MAX under some conditions as
described in the following list.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If an applicable rule of <xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>
states that the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return a layout of length
NFS4_UINT64_MAX, then the lo_length field of the last
element of logr_layout <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be NFS4_UINT64_MAX.
</li>
<li>
If an applicable rule of <xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>
states that the metadata server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return a layout of length
NFS4_UINT64_MAX, then the lo_length field of the last
element of logr_layout <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be NFS4_UINT64_MAX.
</li>
<li>
If an applicable rule of <xref target="layout_hell2" format="default"/>
states that the metadata server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return a layout of length
NFS4_UINT64_MAX, then the lo_length field of the last
element of logr_layout <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be NFS4_UINT64_MAX.
</li>
<li>
When the value of the returned layout length of
<xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/>
and
<xref target="layout_hell2" format="default"/> is not NFS4_UINT64_MAX, then
the returned layout length is equal to the sum of the
lo_length fields of each element of logr_layout.
</li>
</ul>
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
The logr_return_on_close result field is a directive to return
the layout before closing the file. When the metadata server sets this
return value to TRUE, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be prepared to recall the layout
in the case in which the client fails to return the layout before close.
For the metadata server that knows a layout must be returned before a
close of the file, this return value can be used to communicate
the desired behavior to the client and thus remove one extra
step from the client's and metadata server's interaction.
</t>
<t>
The logr_stateid stateid is returned to
the client for use in subsequent layout related operations. See Sections
<xref target="stateid" format="counter"/>, <xref target="layout_stateid" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="pnfs_operation_sequencing" format="counter"/> for a further
discussion and requirements.
</t>
<t>
The format of the returned layout (lo_content)
is specific to the layout type.
The value of the layout type (lo_content.loc_type) for each of
the elements of the array of layouts returned by the metadata server
(logr_layout) <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be equal to the loga_layout_type specified
by the client. If it is not equal, the client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> ignore
the response as invalid and behave as if the metadata server returned
an error, even if the client does have support for the
layout type returned.
</t>
<t>
If neither the requested file nor its
containing file system support layouts, the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_LAYOUTUNAVAILABLE. If the layout type is not supported,
the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_UNKNOWN_LAYOUTTYPE.
If layouts are supported but no layout matches the client
provided layout identification, the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_BADLAYOUT. If an invalid loga_iomode is specified, or a
loga_iomode of LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY is specified, the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_BADIOMODE.
</t>
<t>
If the layout for the file is unavailable due to transient
conditions, e.g., file sharing prohibits layouts, the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
return NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER.
</t>
<t>
If the layout request is rejected due to an overlapping layout
recall, the metadata server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT. See <xref target="pnfs_operation_sequencing" format="default"/> for details.
</t>
<t>
If the layout conflicts with a mandatory byte-range lock held on the
file, and if the storage devices have no method of enforcing
mandatory locks, other than through the restriction of layouts, the
metadata server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_LOCKED.
</t>
<t>
If client sets loga_signal_layout_avail to TRUE, then it is
registering with the client a "want" for a layout in the event
the layout cannot be obtained due to resource exhaustion.
If the metadata server supports and will honor the "want",
the results will have logr_will_signal_layout_avail
set to TRUE.
If so, the client should expect a CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL
operation to indicate that a layout is available.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value and the
current stateid is updated to match the value as returned in the
results.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTGET_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
Typically, LAYOUTGET will be called as part of a
COMPOUND request after an OPEN operation and results
in the client having location information for the
file. This requires that loga_stateid be set to the
special stateid that tells the metadata server to use the
current stateid, which is set by OPEN (see <xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/>). A client may also hold
a layout across multiple OPENs. The client specifies
a layout type that limits what kind of layout the
metadata server will return. This prevents metadata servers from
granting layouts that are unusable by the client.
</t>
<t>
As indicated by <xref target="layout_hell" format="default"/> and
<xref target="layout_hell2" format="default"/>, the specification of
LAYOUTGET allows a pNFS client and server considerable
flexibility.
A pNFS client can take several strategies for sending
LAYOUTGET. Some examples are as follows.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If LAYOUTGET is preceded by OPEN in the same
COMPOUND request and the OPEN requests OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ access,
the client might opt to request a _READ layout
with loga_offset set to zero, loga_minlength set to
zero, and loga_length set to NFS4_UINT64_MAX. If
the file has space allocated to it, that space is
striped over one or more storage devices, and there
is either no conflicting layout or the concept of
a conflicting layout does not apply to the pNFS
server's layout type or implementation, then the
metadata server might return a layout with a starting offset
of zero, and a length equal to the length of the
file, if not NFS4_UINT64_MAX. If the length of the
file is not a multiple of the
pNFS server's stripe
width (see <xref target="file_layout_definitions" format="default"/>
for a formal definition), the metadata server might round up
the returned layout's length.
</li>
<li>
If LAYOUTGET is preceded by OPEN in the same
COMPOUND request, and the OPEN requests OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE access and does
not truncate the file, the client might
opt to request a _RW layout with loga_offset set
to zero, loga_minlength set to zero, and loga_length
set to the file's current length (if known), or
NFS4_UINT64_MAX. As with the previous case, under
some conditions the metadata server might return a layout
that covers the entire length of the file or beyond.
</li>
<li>
This strategy is as above, but the OPEN truncates the file. In this case,
the client might anticipate it will be writing to the
file from offset zero, and so loga_offset and loga_minlength
are set to zero, and loga_length is set to the value of
threshold4_write_iosize. The metadata server might return a layout
from offset zero with a length at least as long as
threshold4_write_iosize.
</li>
<li>
A process on the client invokes a request to read
from offset 10000 for length 50000. The client
is using buffered I/O, and has buffer sizes of
4096 bytes. The client intends to map the request
of the process into a series of READ requests
starting at offset 8192. The end offset needs to be higher
than 10000 + 50000 = 60000, and the next offset that is
a multiple of 4096 is 61440. The difference between 61440 and
that starting offset of the layout is 53248 (which is
the product of 4096 and 15).
The value
of threshold4_read_iosize is less than 53248,
so the client sends a LAYOUTGET request with
loga_offset set to 8192, loga_minlength set to
53248, and loga_length set to the file's length
(if known) minus 8192 or NFS4_UINT64_MAX (if the
file's length is not known). Since this LAYOUTGET
request exceeds the metadata server's threshold, it grants
the layout, possibly with an initial offset of
zero, with an end offset of at least 8192 + 53248 -
1 = 61439, but preferably a layout with an offset
aligned on the stripe width and a length that is
a multiple of the stripe width.
</li>
<li>
This strategy is as above, but the client is not using buffered I/O, and
instead all internal I/O requests are sent directly to
the server. The LAYOUTGET request has loga_offset equal to
10000 and loga_minlength set to 50000. The value of loga_length
is set to the length of the file. The metadata server is free to
return a layout that fully overlaps the requested range, with
a starting offset and length aligned on the stripe width.
</li>
<li>
Again, a process on the client invokes a request
to read from offset 10000 for length 50000 (i.e. a
range with a starting offset of 10000 and an ending
offset of 69999), and
buffered I/O is in use. The client is expecting
that the server might not be able to return the
layout for the full I/O range.
The client intends to map the request of the
process into a series of thirteen READ requests starting at
offset 8192, each with length 4096, with a total
length of 53248 (which equals 13 * 4096), which
fully contains the range that client's process wants to read.
Because the value of threshold4_read_iosize is equal to
4096, it is practical and reasonable for the client to
use several LAYOUTGET operations to complete the series
of READs.
The client sends a LAYOUTGET request with
loga_offset set to 8192, loga_minlength set to 4096,
and loga_length set to 53248 or higher. The server
will grant a layout possibly with an initial offset
of zero, with an end offset of at least 8192 + 4096 -
1 = 12287, but preferably a layout with an offset
aligned on the stripe width and a length that is a
multiple of the stripe width. This will allow the
client to make forward progress, possibly
sending more LAYOUTGET operations for the remainder
of the range.
</li>
<li>
An NFS client detects a sequential read pattern,
and so sends a LAYOUTGET operation that goes well beyond any
current or pending read requests to the server. The
server might likewise detect this pattern, and
grant the LAYOUTGET request. Once the client
reads from an offset of the file that represents
50% of the way through the range of the last layout
it received, in order to avoid stalling I/O that would wait
for a layout, the client sends more operations
from an offset of the file that represents 50%
of the way through the last layout it received. The client
continues to request layouts with byte-ranges that are
well in advance of the byte-ranges of
recent and/or read requests of processes running on the client.
</li>
<li>
This strategy is as above, but the client fails to detect the
pattern, but the server does. The next time the
metadata server gets a LAYOUTGET, it returns a layout with
a length that is well beyond loga_minlength.
</li>
<li>
A client is using buffered I/O, and has a long
queue of write-behinds to process and also detects
a sequential write pattern. It sends a LAYOUTGET
for a layout that spans the range of the queued
write-behinds and well beyond, including ranges
beyond the filer's current length. The client
continues to send LAYOUTGET operations once the write-behind
queue reaches 50% of the maximum queue length.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Once the client has obtained a layout referring to a
particular device ID, the metadata server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
delete the device ID until the layout is returned
or revoked.
</t>
<t>
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID can race with LAYOUTGET. One race
scenario is that LAYOUTGET returns a device ID for which the
client does not have device address mappings,
and the metadata server sends a CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID
to add the device ID to the client's awareness
and meanwhile the client sends GETDEVICEINFO on
the device ID. This scenario is discussed in
<xref target="OP_GETDEVICEINFO_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
Another scenario is that the CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID
is processed by the client before it processes
the results from LAYOUTGET. The client will send
a GETDEVICEINFO on the device ID. If the results
from GETDEVICEINFO are received before the client
gets results from LAYOUTGET, then there is no
longer a race. If the results from LAYOUTGET are
received before the results from GETDEVICEINFO, the
client can either wait for results of GETDEVICEINFO
or send another one to get possibly more up-to-date
device address mappings for the device ID.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_LAYOUTRETURN" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 51: LAYOUTRETURN - Release Layout Information</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTRETURN_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* Constants used for LAYOUTRETURN and CB_LAYOUTRECALL */
const LAYOUT4_RET_REC_FILE = 1;
const LAYOUT4_RET_REC_FSID = 2;
const LAYOUT4_RET_REC_ALL = 3;
enum layoutreturn_type4 {
LAYOUTRETURN4_FILE = LAYOUT4_RET_REC_FILE,
LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID = LAYOUT4_RET_REC_FSID,
LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL = LAYOUT4_RET_REC_ALL
};
struct layoutreturn_file4 {
offset4 lrf_offset;
length4 lrf_length;
stateid4 lrf_stateid;
/* layouttype4 specific data */
opaque lrf_body<>;
};
union layoutreturn4 switch(layoutreturn_type4 lr_returntype) {
case LAYOUTRETURN4_FILE:
layoutreturn_file4 lr_layout;
default:
void;
};
struct LAYOUTRETURN4args {
/* CURRENT_FH: file */
bool lora_reclaim;
layouttype4 lora_layout_type;
layoutiomode4 lora_iomode;
layoutreturn4 lora_layoutreturn;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTRETURN_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union layoutreturn_stateid switch (bool lrs_present) {
case TRUE:
stateid4 lrs_stateid;
case FALSE:
void;
};
union LAYOUTRETURN4res switch (nfsstat4 lorr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
layoutreturn_stateid lorr_stateid;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTRETURN_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation returns from the client to the server
one or more layouts represented by the client ID
(derived from the session ID in the preceding SEQUENCE
operation), lora_layout_type, and lora_iomode.
When lr_returntype is LAYOUTRETURN4_FILE, the
returned layout is further identified by the current
filehandle, lrf_offset, lrf_length, and lrf_stateid.
If the lrf_length field is NFS4_UINT64_MAX, all bytes
of the layout, starting at lrf_offset, are returned.
When lr_returntype is LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID, the
current filehandle is used to identify the file
system and all layouts matching the client ID,
the fsid of the file system, lora_layout_type, and
lora_iomode are returned. When lr_returntype is
LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL, all layouts matching the client
ID, lora_layout_type, and lora_iomode are returned
and the current filehandle is not used. After this
call, the client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> use the returned layout(s)
and the associated storage protocol to access the
file data.
</t>
<t>
If the set of layouts designated in the case of
LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID or LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL is empty, then no error
results. In the case of LAYOUTRETURN4_FILE, the byte-range
specified is returned even if it is a subdivision of a layout
previously obtained with LAYOUTGET, a combination of multiple
layouts previously obtained with LAYOUTGET, or a combination
including some layouts previously obtained with LAYOUTGET,
and one or more subdivisions of such layouts. When the
byte-range does not designate any bytes for which a layout
is held for the specified file, client ID, layout type and
mode, no error results.
See <xref target="bulk_layouts" format="default"/> for considerations with
"bulk" return of layouts.
</t>
<t>
The layout being returned may be a subset
or superset of a layout specified by CB_LAYOUTRECALL. However,
if it is a subset, the recall is not complete until the full
recalled scope has been returned. Recalled scope refers to the
byte-range in the case of LAYOUTRETURN4_FILE, the use of
LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID, or the use of LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL. There must
be a LAYOUTRETURN with a matching scope to complete the return
even if all current layout ranges have been previously individually
returned.
</t>
<t>
For all lr_returntype values, an iomode of LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY
specifies that all layouts that match the other arguments to
LAYOUTRETURN (i.e., client ID, lora_layout_type, and one of
current filehandle and range; fsid derived from current
filehandle; or LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL) are being returned.
</t>
<t>
In the case that lr_returntype is LAYOUTRETURN4_FILE, the
lrf_stateid provided by the client is a layout stateid as
returned from previous layout operations. Note that the "seqid"
field of lrf_stateid <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be zero. See Sections
<xref target="stateid" format="counter"/>, <xref target="layout_stateid" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="pnfs_operation_sequencing" format="counter"/> for a further
discussion and requirements.
</t>
<t>
Return of a layout or all layouts does not invalidate the
mapping of storage device ID to a storage device address. The
mapping remains in effect until specifically changed or deleted via
device ID notification callbacks.
Of course if there are no remaining
layouts that refer to a previously used device ID, the server is
free to delete a device ID without a notification callback, which
will be the case when notifications are not in effect.
</t>
<t>
If the lora_reclaim field is set to TRUE, the
client is attempting to return a layout that
was acquired before the restart of the metadata
server during the metadata server's grace period.
When returning layouts that were acquired during
the metadata server's grace period, the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the
lora_reclaim field to FALSE. The lora_reclaim field
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to FALSE also when lr_layoutreturn is
LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID or LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL. See <xref target="OP_LAYOUTCOMMIT" format="default">LAYOUTCOMMIT </xref> for
more details.
</t>
<t>
Layouts may be returned when recalled or voluntarily (i.e.,
before the server has recalled them). In either case, the client
must properly propagate state changed under the context of the
layout to the storage device(s) or to the metadata server before
returning the layout.
</t>
<t>
If the client returns the layout in response to a
CB_LAYOUTRECALL where the lor_recalltype field of the
clora_recall field was LAYOUTRECALL4_FILE, the client
should use the lor_stateid value from CB_LAYOUTRECALL
as the value for lrf_stateid. Otherwise, it should
use logr_stateid (from a previous LAYOUTGET result)
or lorr_stateid (from a previous LAYRETURN result).
This is done to indicate the point in time (in terms
of layout stateid transitions) when the recall was
sent. The client uses the precise lora_recallstateid
value and <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> set the stateid's seqid to
zero; otherwise, NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
returned. NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID can be returned if
the client is using an old seqid, and the server
knows the client should not be using the old
seqid. For example, the client uses the seqid on slot 1 of
the session, receives the response with the new
seqid, and uses the slot to send another request
with the old seqid.
</t>
<t>
If a client fails to return a layout
in a timely manner, then the metadata server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> use its
control protocol with the storage devices to fence the client
from accessing the data referenced by the layout. See
<xref target="recalling_layout" format="default"/> for more details.
</t>
<t>
If the LAYOUTRETURN request sets the lora_reclaim field to TRUE after
the metadata server's grace period, NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE is returned.
</t>
<t>
If the LAYOUTRETURN request sets the lora_reclaim field to TRUE
and lr_returntype is set to LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID or LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL,
NFS4ERR_INVAL is returned.
</t>
<t>
If the client sets the lr_returntype field to
LAYOUTRETURN4_FILE, then the lrs_stateid field
will represent the layout stateid as updated for
this operation's processing; the current stateid
will also be updated to match the returned value.
If the last byte of any layout for the current
file, client ID, and layout type is being returned
and there are no remaining pending CB_LAYOUTRECALL
operations for which a LAYOUTRETURN operation must be
done, lrs_present <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be FALSE, and no stateid
will be returned. In addition, the COMPOUND request's current
stateid will be set to the all-zeroes special stateid
(see <xref target="current_stateid" format="default"/>). The server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> reject with NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID any further
use of the current stateid in that COMPOUND until
the current stateid is re-established by a later
stateid-returning operation.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle retains its value.
</t>
<t>
If the EXCHGID4_FLAG_BIND_PRINC_STATEID
capability is set on the client ID (see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>), the server will
require that the principal, security flavor,
and if applicable, the GSS mechanism, combination
that acquired the layout also be the one to send
LAYOUTRETURN. This might not be possible
if credentials for the principal are no
longer available. The server will allow the
machine credential or SSV credential (see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>) to send LAYOUTRETURN
if LAYOUTRETURN's operation code was set in the
spo_must_allow result of EXCHANGE_ID.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_LAYOUTRETURN_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The final LAYOUTRETURN operation in response to a CB_LAYOUTRECALL
callback <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be serialized with any outstanding, intersecting
LAYOUTRETURN operations. Note that it is possible that while a
client is returning the layout for some recalled range, the server
may recall a superset of that range (e.g., LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL); the final
return operation for the latter must block until the former layout
recall is done.
</t>
<t>
Returning all layouts in a file system using LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID is
typically done in response to a CB_LAYOUTRECALL for that file system
as the final return operation. Similarly, LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL
is used in response to a recall callback for all layouts. It is
possible that the client already returned some outstanding layouts
via individual LAYOUTRETURN calls and the call for
LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID or LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL marks the end of the
LAYOUTRETURN sequence. See <xref target="recall_robustness" format="default"/>
for more details.
</t>
<t>
Once the client has returned all layouts referring to a particular
device ID, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> delete the device ID.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 52: SECINFO_NO_NAME - Get Security on Unnamed Object</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum secinfo_style4 {
SECINFO_STYLE4_CURRENT_FH = 0,
SECINFO_STYLE4_PARENT = 1
};
/* CURRENT_FH: object or child directory */
typedef secinfo_style4 SECINFO_NO_NAME4args;
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/* CURRENTFH: consumed if status is NFS4_OK */
typedef SECINFO4res SECINFO_NO_NAME4res;
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
Like the SECINFO operation, SECINFO_NO_NAME is used by the
client to obtain a list of valid RPC authentication flavors for
a specific file object. Unlike SECINFO, SECINFO_NO_NAME only
works with objects that are accessed by filehandle.
</t>
<t>
There are two styles of SECINFO_NO_NAME, as determined by the
value of the secinfo_style4 enumeration. If SECINFO_STYLE4_CURRENT_FH is
passed, then SECINFO_NO_NAME is querying for the required
security for the current filehandle. If SECINFO_STYLE4_PARENT is passed, then
SECINFO_NO_NAME is querying for the required security of the
current filehandle's parent. If the style selected is SECINFO_STYLE4_PARENT,
then SECINFO should apply the same access methodology used for
LOOKUPP when evaluating the traversal to the parent directory.
Therefore, if the requester does not have the appropriate access
to LOOKUPP the parent, then SECINFO_NO_NAME must behave the same
way and return NFS4ERR_ACCESS.
</t>
<t>
If PUTFH, PUTPUBFH, PUTROOTFH, or RESTOREFH returns
NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC, then the client resolves the
situation by sending a COMPOUND request that consists of
PUTFH, PUTPUBFH, or PUTROOTFH immediately followed by
SECINFO_NO_NAME, style SECINFO_STYLE4_CURRENT_FH.
See <xref target="Security_Service_Negotiation" format="default"/>
for instructions on dealing with NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC error
returns from PUTFH, PUTROOTFH, PUTPUBFH, or RESTOREFH.
</t>
<t>
If SECINFO_STYLE4_PARENT is specified and there is no parent
directory, SECINFO_NO_NAME <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_NOENT.
</t>
<t>
On success, the current filehandle is consumed
(see <xref target="aftersecinfo" format="default"/>), and if the
next operation after SECINFO_NO_NAME tries to use
the current filehandle, that operation will fail
with the status NFS4ERR_NOFILEHANDLE.
</t>
<t>
Everything else about SECINFO_NO_NAME is the same as SECINFO.
See the discussion on SECINFO (<xref target="OP_SECINFO_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SECINFO_NO_NAME_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
See the discussion on SECINFO (<xref target="OP_SECINFO_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_SEQUENCE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 53: SEQUENCE - Supply Per-Procedure Sequencing and Control</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SEQUENCE_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct SEQUENCE4args {
sessionid4 sa_sessionid;
sequenceid4 sa_sequenceid;
slotid4 sa_slotid;
slotid4 sa_highest_slotid;
bool sa_cachethis;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SEQUENCE_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN = 0x00000001;
const SEQ4_STATUS_CB_GSS_CONTEXTS_EXPIRING = 0x00000002;
const SEQ4_STATUS_CB_GSS_CONTEXTS_EXPIRED = 0x00000004;
const SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED = 0x00000008;
const SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_SOME_STATE_REVOKED = 0x00000010;
const SEQ4_STATUS_ADMIN_STATE_REVOKED = 0x00000020;
const SEQ4_STATUS_RECALLABLE_STATE_REVOKED = 0x00000040;
const SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED = 0x00000080;
const SEQ4_STATUS_RESTART_RECLAIM_NEEDED = 0x00000100;
const SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN_SESSION = 0x00000200;
const SEQ4_STATUS_BACKCHANNEL_FAULT = 0x00000400;
const SEQ4_STATUS_DEVID_CHANGED = 0x00000800;
const SEQ4_STATUS_DEVID_DELETED = 0x00001000;
struct SEQUENCE4resok {
sessionid4 sr_sessionid;
sequenceid4 sr_sequenceid;
slotid4 sr_slotid;
slotid4 sr_highest_slotid;
slotid4 sr_target_highest_slotid;
uint32_t sr_status_flags;
};
union SEQUENCE4res switch (nfsstat4 sr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
SEQUENCE4resok sr_resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SEQUENCE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The SEQUENCE operation is
used by the server to implement session request control
and the reply cache semantics.
</t>
<t>
SEQUENCE <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> appear as the first operation of any COMPOUND
in which it appears. The error NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS will be
returned when it is found in any position in a COMPOUND
beyond the first. Operations other than SEQUENCE, BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION,
EXCHANGE_ID, CREATE_SESSION, and DESTROY_SESSION,
<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> appear as the first operation in a
COMPOUND. Such operations <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> yield the error NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION
if they do appear at the start of a COMPOUND.
</t>
<t>
If SEQUENCE is received on a connection not associated with the
session via CREATE_SESSION or BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION, and
connection association enforcement is enabled
(see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>), then
the server returns NFS4ERR_CONN_NOT_BOUND_TO_SESSION.
</t>
<t>
The sa_sessionid argument identifies the session to which this
request applies. The sr_sessionid result <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> equal
sa_sessionid.
</t>
<t>
The sa_slotid argument is the index in the reply cache
for the request. The sa_sequenceid field is the sequence
number of the request for the reply cache entry (slot).
The sr_slotid result <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> equal sa_slotid. The sr_sequenceid
result <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> equal sa_sequenceid.
</t>
<t>
The sa_highest_slotid argument is the highest slot ID
for which the client has a request outstanding; it could be
equal to sa_slotid.
The server returns two "highest_slotid" values: sr_highest_slotid
and sr_target_highest_slotid. The former is the highest slot ID
the server will accept in future SEQUENCE operation, and
<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be less than the value of sa_highest_slotid
(but see
<xref target="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" format="default"/>
for an exception).
The latter is the highest slot ID the server would prefer the
client use on a future SEQUENCE operation.
</t>
<t>
If sa_cachethis is TRUE, then the client is requesting that
the server cache the entire
reply in the server's reply cache; therefore, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
cache the reply (see <xref target="optional_reply_caching" format="default"/>).
The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> cache the reply if sa_cachethis is FALSE.
If the server does not cache the entire reply, it
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> still record that it executed the request at
the specified slot and sequence ID.
</t>
<t>
The response to the SEQUENCE operation contains a
word of status flags (sr_status_flags) that can
provide to the client information related to the
status of the client's lock state and communications
paths. Note that any status bits relating to lock
state <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be reset when lock state is lost due to a
server restart (even if the session is persistent across
restarts; session persistence does not imply
lock state persistence)
or the establishment of a new client
instance.
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates that the client has no
operational backchannel path for any session
associated with the client ID, making it
necessary for the client to re-establish one.
This bit
remains set on all SEQUENCE responses on all sessions
associated with the client ID
until at least one backchannel is
available on any session associated with the client ID.
If the client fails to re-establish a
backchannel for the client ID, it is subject to
having recallable state revoked.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN_SESSION</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates that the session has
no operational backchannel. There are two reasons
why SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN_SESSION may be set and not
SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN. First is that a callback operation
that applies specifically to the
session (e.g., CB_RECALL_SLOT, see <xref target="OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT" format="default"/>) needs to be sent.
Second is that the server did send a callback operation,
but the connection was lost before the reply. The
server cannot be sure whether or not the client received the
callback operation, and so, per rules on
request retry, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> retry the callback
operation over the same session. The
SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN_SESSION bit is the indication
to the client that it needs to associate a connection
to the session's backchannel.
This bit remains set on all SEQUENCE responses of the
session until a connection is associated with the
session's a backchannel.
If the client fails to re-establish a
backchannel for the session, it is subject to
having recallable state revoked.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_CB_GSS_CONTEXTS_EXPIRING</dt>
<dd>
<t>
When set, indicates that all GSS contexts or RPCSEC_GSS handles
assigned to the session's backchannel will expire within a
period equal to the lease time. This bit remains set on all
SEQUENCE replies until at least one of the following are true:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
All SSV RPCSEC_GSS handles on the session's backchannel
have been destroyed and all non-SSV GSS contexts have expired.
</li>
<li>
At least one more SSV RPCSEC_GSS handle has been added to
the backchannel.
</li>
<li>
The expiration time of at least one non-SSV GSS context
of an RPCSEC_GSS handle
is beyond the lease period from the current
time (relative to the time of when a SEQUENCE
response was sent)
</li>
</ul>
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_CB_GSS_CONTEXTS_EXPIRED</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates all non-SSV GSS contexts and all
SSV RPCSEC_GSS handles assigned
to the session's backchannel have expired or have been
destroyed.
This bit remains set on all SEQUENCE replies
until at least one non-expired non-SSV GSS context for the
session's backchannel has been established or at least one
SSV RPCSEC_GSS handle has been assigned to the backchannel.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates that the lease has expired
and as a result the server released all of the
client's locking state. This status bit remains
set on all SEQUENCE replies until the loss of
all such locks has been acknowledged by use of
FREE_STATEID (see <xref target="OP_FREE_STATEID" format="default"/>), or by establishing a new client instance by
destroying all sessions (via DESTROY_SESSION),
the client ID (via DESTROY_CLIENTID), and then
invoking EXCHANGE_ID and CREATE_SESSION to
establish a new client ID.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_SOME_STATE_REVOKED</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates that some subset of the client's locks
have been revoked due to expiration of the lease period
followed by another client's conflicting LOCK operation.
This status bit remains set on all SEQUENCE replies
until the loss of all
such locks has been acknowledged by use of FREE_STATEID.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_ADMIN_STATE_REVOKED</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates that one or more locks have been revoked
without expiration of the lease period, due to administrative
action. This status bit remains set on all SEQUENCE replies
until the loss of all
such locks has been acknowledged by use of FREE_STATEID.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_RECALLABLE_STATE_REVOKED</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates that one or more recallable
objects have been revoked without expiration
of the lease period, due to the client's
failure to return them when recalled, which
may be a consequence of there being no working
backchannel and the client failing to re-establish
a backchannel per the SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN,
SEQ4_STATUS_CB_PATH_DOWN_SESSION, or
SEQ4_STATUS_CB_GSS_CONTEXTS_EXPIRED status flags.
This status bit remains set on all SEQUENCE
replies until the loss of all such locks has
been acknowledged by use of FREE_STATEID.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_LEASE_MOVED</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates that responsibility for lease renewal has
been transferred to one or more new servers. This condition
will continue until the client receives an NFS4ERR_MOVED
error and the server receives the subsequent GETATTR for the
fs_locations or fs_locations_info attribute for an access to
each file system for which a lease has been moved to a new
server. See <xref target="transferred_lease" format="default"/>.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_RESTART_RECLAIM_NEEDED</dt>
<dd>
When set, indicates that due to server
restart, the client must reclaim locking state.
Until the client sends a global RECLAIM_COMPLETE
(<xref target="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE" format="default"/>), every
SEQUENCE operation will return
SEQ4_STATUS_RESTART_RECLAIM_NEEDED.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_BACKCHANNEL_FAULT</dt>
<dd>
The server has encountered an unrecoverable fault
with the backchannel (e.g., it has lost track of the
sequence ID for a slot in the backchannel). The
client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> stop sending more requests on the
session's fore channel, wait for all outstanding requests to
complete on the fore and back channel, and then
destroy the session.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_DEVID_CHANGED</dt>
<dd>
The client is using device ID notifications and the server
has changed a device ID mapping held by the client. This
flag will stay present until the client has obtained the new
mapping with GETDEVICEINFO.
</dd>
<dt>SEQ4_STATUS_DEVID_DELETED</dt>
<dd>
The client is using device ID notifications and the server
has deleted a device ID mapping held by the client.
This flag will stay in effect until the client sends a GETDEVICEINFO
on the device ID with a null value in the argument gdia_notify_types.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
The value of the sa_sequenceid argument relative to
the cached sequence ID on the slot falls into one
of three cases.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the difference between sa_sequenceid and
the server's cached sequence ID at the slot ID
is two (2) or more,
or if sa_sequenceid is less
than the cached sequence ID (accounting
for wraparound of the unsigned sequence ID value),
then the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED.
</li>
<li>
If sa_sequenceid and the cached sequence ID are
the same, this is a retry, and the server replies
with what is recorded in the reply
cache.
The lease is possibly renewed as described below.
</li>
<li>
If sa_sequenceid is one greater (accounting for
wraparound) than the cached sequence ID, then
this is a new request, and the slot's sequence
ID is incremented. The operations subsequent to
SEQUENCE, if any, are processed. If there are no
other operations, the only other effects are to
cache the SEQUENCE reply in the slot, maintain the
session's activity, and possibly renew the lease.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the client reuses a slot ID and sequence ID for
a completely different request, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> treat
the request as if it is a retry of what it has already
executed. The server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> however detect the client's
illegal reuse and return NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY.
</t>
<t>
If SEQUENCE returns an error, then the state of the
slot (sequence ID, cached reply) <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> change,
and the associated lease <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be renewed.
</t>
<t>
If SEQUENCE returns NFS4_OK, then the associated
lease <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be renewed (see <xref target="lease_renewal" format="default"/>),
except if SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED is
returned in sr_status_flags.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SEQUENCE_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> maintain a mapping of session ID to client ID
in order to validate any operations that follow SEQUENCE
that take a stateid as an argument and/or result.
</t>
<t>
If the client establishes a persistent session, then
a SEQUENCE received after a server restart might encounter
requests performed and recorded in a persistent reply
cache before the server restart. In this case, SEQUENCE
will be processed successfully, while requests that
were not previously performed and recorded are rejected with
NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION.
</t>
<t>
Depending on which of the operations within the COMPOUND were
successfully
performed before the server restart, these operations will
also have replies sent from the server reply cache.
Note that when these operations establish locking state, it
is locking state that applies to the previous server instance
and to the previous client ID, even though the
server restart, which logically happened after these
operations, eliminated that state. In the
case of a partially executed COMPOUND, processing may reach
an operation not processed during the earlier server instance,
making this operation a new one and not performable on the
existing session. In this case, NFS4ERR_DEADSESSION will be
returned from that operation.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_SET_SSV" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 54: SET_SSV - Update SSV for a Client ID</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SET_SSV_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct ssa_digest_input4 {
SEQUENCE4args sdi_seqargs;
};
struct SET_SSV4args {
opaque ssa_ssv<>;
opaque ssa_digest<>;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SET_SSV_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct ssr_digest_input4 {
SEQUENCE4res sdi_seqres;
};
struct SET_SSV4resok {
opaque ssr_digest<>;
};
union SET_SSV4res switch (nfsstat4 ssr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
SET_SSV4resok ssr_resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SET_SSV_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation is used to update the
SSV for a client ID. Before SET_SSV is called the
first time on a client ID, the SSV is zero.
The SSV is the key used for the SSV GSS mechanism
(<xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>)
</t>
<t>
SET_SSV <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be preceded by a
SEQUENCE operation in the same COMPOUND.
It <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be used if the client
did not opt for SP4_SSV state protection when the
client ID was created
(see <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>);
the server returns NFS4ERR_INVAL in that case.
</t>
<t>
The field ssa_digest is computed as the output of
the HMAC (<xref target="RFC2104" format="default">RFC 2104</xref>) using the subkey derived
from the SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_I2T and current SSV
as the key (see <xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/> for a
description of subkeys), and an XDR encoded value of data type ssa_digest_input4.
The field sdi_seqargs is equal to the
arguments of the SEQUENCE operation
for the COMPOUND procedure that
SET_SSV is within.
</t>
<t>
The argument ssa_ssv
is XORed with the current SSV to produce
the new SSV. The argument ssa_ssv <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be generated randomly.
</t>
<t>
In the response, ssr_digest is the output of the HMAC using the
subkey derived from SSV4_SUBKEY_MIC_T2I and new SSV as the key,
and an XDR encoded value of data type ssr_digest_input4. The
field sdi_seqres is equal to the results of the SEQUENCE
operation for the COMPOUND procedure that SET_SSV is within.
</t>
<t>
As noted in <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>, the client and
server can maintain multiple concurrent versions of the SSV.
The client and server each <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> maintain an internal
SSV version number, which is set to one the first time
SET_SSV executes on the server and the client
receives the first SET_SSV reply. Each subsequent
SET_SSV increases the internal SSV version number by one. The
value of this version number corresponds to the smpt_ssv_seq,
smt_ssv_seq, sspt_ssv_seq, and ssct_ssv_seq fields of the
SSV GSS mechanism tokens (see <xref target="ssv_mech" format="default"/>).
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_SET_SSV_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
When the server receives ssa_digest, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> verify the digest
by computing the digest the same way the client did and
comparing it with ssa_digest. If the server gets a different
result, this is an error, NFS4ERR_BAD_SESSION_DIGEST.
This error might be the result of another SET_SSV from the
same client ID changing the SSV. If so, the client recovers
by sending a SET_SSV operation again with a recomputed digest based on
the subkey of the new SSV. If the transport connection is dropped after
the SET_SSV request is sent, but before the
SET_SSV reply is received, then there are special considerations
for recovery if the client has no more connections associated
with sessions associated with the client ID of the SSV. See
<xref target="OP_BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION_IMPLEMENTATION" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Clients <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> send an ssa_ssv that is equal to a previous
ssa_ssv, nor equal to a previous or current SSV (including an ssa_ssv equal to zero
since the SSV is initialized to zero when the client ID is created).
</t>
<t>
Clients <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send SET_SSV with RPCSEC_GSS privacy. Servers
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> support RPCSEC_GSS with privacy for any COMPOUND that has {
SEQUENCE, SET_SSV }.
</t>
<t>
A client <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> send SET_SSV with the SSV GSS
mechanism's credential because the purpose of SET_SSV
is to seed the SSV from non-SSV credentials. Instead,
SET_SSV <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be sent with the credential of
a user that is accessing the client ID for the
first time
(<xref target="protect_state_change" format="default"/>).
However, if the client does send SET_SSV with SSV
credentials, the digest protecting the arguments
uses the value of the SSV before ssa_ssv is XORed in,
and the digest protecting the results uses the value
of the SSV after the ssa_ssv is XORed in.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_TEST_STATEID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 55: TEST_STATEID - Test Stateids for Validity</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_TEST_STATEID_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct TEST_STATEID4args {
stateid4 ts_stateids<>;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_TEST_STATEID_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct TEST_STATEID4resok {
nfsstat4 tsr_status_codes<>;
};
union TEST_STATEID4res switch (nfsstat4 tsr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
TEST_STATEID4resok tsr_resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_TEST_STATEID4_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The TEST_STATEID operation is used to check the validity of
a set of stateids. It can be used at any time, but the client
should definitely use it when it
receives an indication that one or more of its stateids have been
invalidated due to lock revocation. This occurs when the SEQUENCE
operation returns with one of the following sr_status_flags set:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_SOME_STATE_REVOKED
</li>
<li>
SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ADMIN_STATE_REVOKED
</li>
<li>
SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_RECALLABLE_STATE_REVOKED
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The client can use TEST_STATEID one or more times to test the
validity of its stateids. Each use of TEST_STATEID allows a large
set of such stateids to be tested and avoids problems with earlier
stateids in a COMPOUND request from interfering with the checking of
subsequent stateids, as would happen if individual stateids were
tested by a series of corresponding by operations in a COMPOUND
request.
</t>
<t>
For each stateid, the server returns the status code that
would be returned if that stateid were to be used in normal
operation. Returning such a status indication is not an
error and does not cause COMPOUND processing to terminate. Checks
for the validity of the stateid proceed as they would for
normal operations with a number of exceptions:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
There is no check for the type of stateid object, as would be
the case for normal use of a stateid.
</li>
<li>
There is no reference to the current filehandle.
</li>
<li>
Special stateids are always considered invalid (they result
in the error code NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID).
</li>
</ul>
<t>
All stateids are interpreted as being associated with the client
for the current session. Any possible association with a previous
instance of the client (as stale stateids) is not considered.
</t>
<t>
The valid status values in the returned status_code array
are NFS4ERR_OK, NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID, NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID,
NFS4ERR_EXPIRED, NFS4ERR_ADMIN_REVOKED, and NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_TEST_STATEID_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
See Sections <xref target="stateid_structure" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="stateid_lifetime" format="counter"/>
for a discussion of stateid structure, lifetime, and validation.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_WANT_DELEGATION" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 56: WANT_DELEGATION - Request Delegation</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_WANT_DELEGATION_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union deleg_claim4 switch (open_claim_type4 dc_claim) {
/*
* No special rights to object. Ordinary delegation
* request of the specified object. Object identified
* by filehandle.
*/
case CLAIM_FH: /* new to v4.1 */
/* CURRENT_FH: object being delegated */
void;
/*
* Right to file based on a delegation granted
* to a previous boot instance of the client.
* File is specified by filehandle.
*/
case CLAIM_DELEG_PREV_FH: /* new to v4.1 */
/* CURRENT_FH: object being delegated */
void;
/*
* Right to the file established by an open previous
* to server reboot. File identified by filehandle.
* Used during server reclaim grace period.
*/
case CLAIM_PREVIOUS:
/* CURRENT_FH: object being reclaimed */
open_delegation_type4 dc_delegate_type;
};
struct WANT_DELEGATION4args {
uint32_t wda_want;
deleg_claim4 wda_claim;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_WANT_DELEGATION_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union WANT_DELEGATION4res switch (nfsstat4 wdr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
open_delegation4 wdr_resok4;
default:
void;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_WANT_DELEGATION_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
Where this description mandates the return of a specific error
code for a specific condition, and where multiple conditions
apply, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> return any of the mandated error codes.
</t>
<t>
This operation allows a client to:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Get a delegation on all types
of files except directories.
</li>
<li>
Register a "want" for a delegation for the
specified file object, and be notified via a
callback when the delegation is available. The
server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> support notifications of availability
via callbacks. If the server does not support
registration of wants, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return
an error to indicate that, and instead <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
return with ond_why set to WND4_CONTENTION or
WND4_RESOURCE and ond_server_will_push_deleg or
ond_server_will_signal_avail set to FALSE. When the
server indicates that it will notify the client
by means of a callback, it will either provide
the delegation using a CB_PUSH_DELEG operation or
cancel its promise by sending a CB_WANTS_CANCELLED
operation.
</li>
<li>
Cancel a want for a delegation.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The client <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> set OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_READ and <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>
set OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE in wda_want. If it does, the server
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> ignore them.
</t>
<t>
The meanings of the following flags in wda_want are the same as
they are in OPEN, except as noted below.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_READ_DELEG
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_WRITE_DELEG
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_ANY_DELEG
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_NO_DELEG. Unlike the OPEN operation,
this flag <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be set by the client in the arguments to
WANT_DELEGATION, and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be ignored by the server.
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_CANCEL
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_SIGNAL_DELEG_WHEN_RESRC_AVAIL
</li>
<li>
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_PUSH_DELEG_WHEN_UNCONTENDED
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The handling of the above flags in WANT_DELEGATION is the same
as in OPEN. Information about the delegation and/or the
promises the server is making regarding future callbacks are
the same as those described in the open_delegation4 structure.
</t>
<t>
The successful results of WANT_DELEGATION are of data type
open_delegation4, which is the same data type as the "delegation"
field in the results of the OPEN operation
(see <xref target="OP_OPEN_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>).
The server constructs wdr_resok4 the same way it constructs
OPEN's "delegation" with one difference:
WANT_DELEGATION <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> return a delegation type of
OPEN_DELEGATE_NONE.
</t>
<t>
If ((wda_want &amp; OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_DELEG_MASK) &amp;
~OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_NO_DELEG) is zero,
then the client is indicating no
explicit desire or non-desire for a delegation and the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_INVAL.
</t>
<t>
The client uses the
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_CANCEL
flag in the WANT_DELEGATION
operation to cancel a previously requested want for a delegation.
Note that if the server is in the process of sending the
delegation (via CB_PUSH_DELEG) at the time the client sends
a cancellation of the want, the delegation might still be pushed
to the client.
</t>
<t>
If WANT_DELEGATION fails to return a delegation, and
the server returns NFS4_OK, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the
delegation type to OPEN4_DELEGATE_NONE_EXT, and set
od_whynone, as described in <xref target="OP_OPEN" format="default"/>. Write delegations are not available for
file types that are not writable. This includes
file objects of types NF4BLK, NF4CHR, NF4LNK,
NF4SOCK, and NF4FIFO. If the client requests
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_WRITE_DELEG without
OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WANT_READ_DELEG on an object with
one of the aforementioned file types, the server must
set wdr_resok4.od_whynone.ond_why to
WND4_WRITE_DELEG_NOT_SUPP_FTYPE.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_WANT_DELEGATION_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
A request for a conflicting delegation is not normally intended to trigger
the recall of the existing delegation. Servers may choose to treat
some clients as having higher priority such that their wants will
trigger recall of an existing delegation, although that is expected
to be an unusual situation.
</t>
<t>
Servers will generally recall delegations assigned by WANT_DELEGATION
on the same basis as those assigned by OPEN. CB_RECALL will generally
be done only when other clients perform operations inconsistent with
the delegation. The normal response to aging of delegations is to use
CB_RECALL_ANY, in order to give the client the opportunity to keep
the delegations most useful from its point of view.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 57: DESTROY_CLIENTID - Destroy a Client ID</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct DESTROY_CLIENTID4args {
clientid4 dca_clientid;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct DESTROY_CLIENTID4res {
nfsstat4 dcr_status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The DESTROY_CLIENTID operation destroys the
client ID. If there are sessions (both idle and
non-idle), opens, locks, delegations, layouts,
and/or wants (<xref target="OP_WANT_DELEGATION" format="default"/>)
associated with the unexpired lease of the client
ID, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY.
DESTROY_CLIENTID <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be preceded with a SEQUENCE
operation as long as the client ID derived from the
session ID of SEQUENCE is not the same as the client
ID to be destroyed. If the client IDs are the same,
then the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY.
</t>
<t>
If DESTROY_CLIENTID is not prefixed by SEQUENCE,
it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the only operation in the COMPOUND
request (otherwise, the server <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return
NFS4ERR_NOT_ONLY_OP). If the operation is sent
without a SEQUENCE preceding it, a client that
retransmits the request may receive an error in
response, because the original request might have
been successfully executed.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_DESTROY_CLIENTID_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
DESTROY_CLIENTID allows a server to immediately
reclaim the resources consumed by an unused client
ID, and also to forget that it ever generated the
client ID. By forgetting that it ever generated the client
ID, the server can safely reuse the client ID on a
future EXCHANGE_ID operation.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 58: RECLAIM_COMPLETE - Indicates Reclaims Finished</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr" markers="true"><![CDATA[
struct RECLAIM_COMPLETE4args {
/*
* If rca_one_fs TRUE,
*
* CURRENT_FH: object in
* file system reclaim is
* complete for.
*/
bool rca_one_fs;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr" markers="true"><![CDATA[
struct RECLAIM_COMPLETE4res {
nfsstat4 rcr_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
A RECLAIM_COMPLETE operation is used to indicate that the client
has reclaimed all of the locking state that it will recover using
reclaim,
when it is recovering state due to either a server restart or the
migration of a file system to another server. There are two types
of RECLAIM_COMPLETE operations:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When rca_one_fs is FALSE, a global RECLAIM_COMPLETE is being
done. This indicates that recovery of all
locks that the client held on the previous server instance
has been completed. The current filehandle need not be set in
this case.
</li>
<li>
When rca_one_fs is TRUE, a file system-specific RECLAIM_COMPLETE
is being done. This indicates that recovery of locks
for a single fs (the one designated by the current filehandle)
due to the migration of the file system has been completed. Presence
of a current filehandle is required when rca_one_fs is set to TRUE.
When the current filehandle designates a filehandle in a file system
not in the process of migration, the operation returns NFS4_OK and
is otherwise ignored.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Once a RECLAIM_COMPLETE is done, there can be no further
reclaim operations for locks whose scope is defined as having
completed recovery. Once the client sends RECLAIM_COMPLETE,
the server will not allow the client to do
subsequent reclaims of locking state for that scope
and, if these are attempted, will return NFS4ERR_NO_GRACE.
</t>
<t>
Whenever a client establishes a new client ID and before it does
the first non-reclaim operation that obtains a lock, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send a
RECLAIM_COMPLETE with rca_one_fs set to FALSE, even if there
are no locks to
reclaim. If non-reclaim
locking operations are done before the RECLAIM_COMPLETE, an NFS4ERR_GRACE
error will be returned.
</t>
<t>
Similarly, when the client accesses a migrated file system on a new
server, before it sends the first non-reclaim operation that
obtains a lock on this new server, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send a RECLAIM_COMPLETE
with rca_one_fs set to TRUE and current filehandle within that file system,
even if there are no locks to reclaim. If non-reclaim locking
operations are done on that file system before the
RECLAIM_COMPLETE, an NFS4ERR_GRACE error will be returned.
</t>
<t>
It should be noted that there are situations in which a client needs
to issue both forms of RECLAIM_COMPLETE. An example is an instance
of file system migration in which the file system is migrated to a
server for which the client has no clientid. As a result, the client
needs to obtain a clientid from the server (incurring the responsibility
to do RECLAIM_COMPLETE with rca_one_fs set to FALSE) as well as
RECLAIM_COMPLETE with rca_one_fs set to TRUE to complete the per-fs
grace period associated with the file system migration. These two
may be done in any order as long as all necessary lock reclaims
have been done before
issuing either of them.
</t>
<t>
Any locks not reclaimed at the point at which RECLAIM_COMPLETE
is done become non-reclaimable. The client <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> attempt
to reclaim them, either during
the current server instance or in any subsequent
server instance, or on another server to which responsibility
for that file system is transferred. If the client were to do so,
it would be
violating the protocol by representing itself as owning locks
that it does not own, and so has no right to reclaim. See
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="of" section="8.4.3"/> for a
discussion of edge conditions related to lock reclaim.
</t>
<t>
By sending a RECLAIM_COMPLETE, the client indicates readiness
to proceed to do normal non-reclaim locking operations. The client
should be aware that such operations may temporarily result in
NFS4ERR_GRACE errors until the server is ready to terminate its
grace period.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
Servers will typically use the information as to when reclaim
activity is complete to reduce the length of the grace period.
When the server maintains in persistent storage
a list of clients that might have had locks,
it is able to use the fact that
all such clients have done a RECLAIM_COMPLETE to terminate the
grace period and begin normal operations (i.e., grant requests
for new locks) sooner than it might otherwise.
</t>
<t>
Latency can be minimized by doing a RECLAIM_COMPLETE as part of
the COMPOUND request in which the last lock-reclaiming operation
is done. When there are no reclaims to be done, RECLAIM_COMPLETE
should be done immediately in order to allow the grace period
to end as soon as possible.
</t>
<t>
RECLAIM_COMPLETE should only be done once for each server instance
or occasion of the transition of a file system.
If it is done a second time, the error NFS4ERR_COMPLETE_ALREADY will
result. Note that because of the session feature's retry protection,
retries of COMPOUND
requests containing RECLAIM_COMPLETE operation will not result
in this error.
</t>
<t>
When a RECLAIM_COMPLETE is sent, the client effectively acknowledges
any locks not yet reclaimed as lost. This allows the server to
re-enable the client to recover locks if the occurrence of edge
conditions, as described in
<xref target="network_partitions_and_recovery" format="default"/>,
had caused the server to disable the client's ability to
recover locks.
</t>
<t>
Because previous descriptions of RECLAIM_COMPLETE were not
sufficiently explicit about the circumstances in which use of
RECLAIM_COMPLETE with rca_one_fs set to TRUE was appropriate,
there have been cases in which it has been misused by clients who
have issued RECLAIM_COMPLETE with rca_one_fs set to TRUE when it
should have not been. There have also been
cases in which servers have, in various ways, not responded to
such misuse as described above, either ignoring the rca_one_fs
setting (treating the operation as a global RECLAIM_COMPLETE) or
ignoring the entire operation.
</t>
<t>
While clients <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> misuse
this feature, and servers <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> respond to such misuse as described
above, implementors need to be aware of the following considerations
as they make necessary trade-offs between interoperability with
existing implementations and proper support for facilities to
allow lock recovery in the event of file system migration.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
When servers have no support for becoming the destination server
of a file system subject to migration, there is no possibility of
a per-fs RECLAIM_COMPLETE being done legitimately, and occurrences of it
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be ignored. However, the negative consequences of accepting
such mistaken use are quite limited as long as the client does
not issue it
before all necessary reclaims are done.
</li>
<li>
When a server might become the destination for a file system being
migrated, inappropriate use of per-fs RECLAIM_COMPLETE is more
concerning. In the case in which the file system designated is not
within a per-fs grace period, the per-fs RECLAIM_COMPLETE <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>
be ignored, with the
negative consequences of accepting it being limited, as in the
case in which migration is not supported. However, if the server
encounters a file system undergoing migration, the operation
cannot be accepted
as if it were a global RECLAIM_COMPLETE without invalidating its
intended use.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_ILLEGAL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 10044: ILLEGAL - Illegal Operation</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_ILLEGAL_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_ILLEGAL_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct ILLEGAL4res {
nfsstat4 status;
};]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_ILLEGAL_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation is a placeholder for encoding a result to handle the
case of the client sending an operation code within COMPOUND that is
not supported. See the COMPOUND procedure description for more
details.
</t>
<t>
The status field of ILLEGAL4res <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_ILLEGAL_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
A client will probably not send an operation with code OP_ILLEGAL but
if it does, the response will be ILLEGAL4res just as it would be with
any other invalid operation code. Note that if the server gets an
illegal operation code that is not OP_ILLEGAL, and if the server
checks for legal operation codes during the XDR decode phase, then the
ILLEGAL4res would not be returned.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
</section>
<!-- $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="nfsv41callbackprocedures" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4.1 Callback Procedures</name>
<t>
The procedures used for callbacks are defined in the following
sections. In the interest of clarity, the terms "client" and "server"
refer to NFS clients and servers, despite the fact that for an
individual callback RPC, the sense of these terms would be precisely
the opposite.
</t>
<t>
Both procedures, CB_NULL and CB_COMPOUND, <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be implemented.
</t>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="PROC_CB_NULL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Procedure 0: CB_NULL - No Operation</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_CB_NULL_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_CB_NULL_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
void;]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_CB_NULL_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
CB_NULL is the standard ONC RPC NULL procedure, with the standard void argument and void response. Even though
there is no direct functionality associated with this procedure, the
server will use CB_NULL to confirm the existence of a path for RPCs
from the server to client.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_CB_NULL_ERRORS" numbered="true">
<name>ERRORS</name>
<t>
None.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="PROC_CB_COMPOUND" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Procedure 1: CB_COMPOUND - Compound Operations</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_CB_COMPOUND_ARGUMENTS" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
enum nfs_cb_opnum4 {
OP_CB_GETATTR = 3,
OP_CB_RECALL = 4,
/* Callback operations new to NFSv4.1 */
OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL = 5,
OP_CB_NOTIFY = 6,
OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG = 7,
OP_CB_RECALL_ANY = 8,
OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL = 9,
OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT = 10,
OP_CB_SEQUENCE = 11,
OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED = 12,
OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK = 13,
OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID = 14,
OP_CB_ILLEGAL = 10044
};
union nfs_cb_argop4 switch (unsigned argop) {
case OP_CB_GETATTR:
CB_GETATTR4args opcbgetattr;
case OP_CB_RECALL:
CB_RECALL4args opcbrecall;
case OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL:
CB_LAYOUTRECALL4args opcblayoutrecall;
case OP_CB_NOTIFY:
CB_NOTIFY4args opcbnotify;
case OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG:
CB_PUSH_DELEG4args opcbpush_deleg;
case OP_CB_RECALL_ANY:
CB_RECALL_ANY4args opcbrecall_any;
case OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL:
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL4args opcbrecallable_obj_avail;
case OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT:
CB_RECALL_SLOT4args opcbrecall_slot;
case OP_CB_SEQUENCE:
CB_SEQUENCE4args opcbsequence;
case OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED:
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED4args opcbwants_cancelled;
case OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK:
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK4args opcbnotify_lock;
case OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID:
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID4args opcbnotify_deviceid;
case OP_CB_ILLEGAL: void;
};
struct CB_COMPOUND4args {
utf8str_cs tag;
uint32_t minorversion;
uint32_t callback_ident;
nfs_cb_argop4 argarray<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_CB_COMPOUND_RESULTS" numbered="true">
<name>RESULTS</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
union nfs_cb_resop4 switch (unsigned resop) {
case OP_CB_GETATTR: CB_GETATTR4res opcbgetattr;
case OP_CB_RECALL: CB_RECALL4res opcbrecall;
/* new NFSv4.1 operations */
case OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL:
CB_LAYOUTRECALL4res
opcblayoutrecall;
case OP_CB_NOTIFY: CB_NOTIFY4res opcbnotify;
case OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG: CB_PUSH_DELEG4res
opcbpush_deleg;
case OP_CB_RECALL_ANY: CB_RECALL_ANY4res
opcbrecall_any;
case OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL:
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL4res
opcbrecallable_obj_avail;
case OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT:
CB_RECALL_SLOT4res
opcbrecall_slot;
case OP_CB_SEQUENCE: CB_SEQUENCE4res opcbsequence;
case OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED:
CB_WANTS_CANCELLED4res
opcbwants_cancelled;
case OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK:
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK4res
opcbnotify_lock;
case OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID:
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID4res
opcbnotify_deviceid;
/* Not new operation */
case OP_CB_ILLEGAL: CB_ILLEGAL4res opcbillegal;
};
struct CB_COMPOUND4res {
nfsstat4 status;
utf8str_cs tag;
nfs_cb_resop4 resarray<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_COMPOUND_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_COMPOUND procedure is used to combine one or more of the
callback procedures into a single RPC request. The main callback RPC
program has two main procedures: CB_NULL and CB_COMPOUND. All other
operations use the CB_COMPOUND procedure as a wrapper.
</t>
<t>
During the processing of the CB_COMPOUND procedure, the client may find
that it does not have the available resources to execute any or all of
the operations within the CB_COMPOUND sequence.
Refer to <xref target="COMPOUND_Sizing_Issues" format="default"/> for details.
</t>
<t>
The minorversion field of the arguments <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the same as the
minorversion of the COMPOUND procedure used to create the client ID
and session. For NFSv4.1, minorversion <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to 1.
</t>
<t>
Contained within the CB_COMPOUND results is a "status" field. This
status <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be equal to the status of the last operation that was
executed within the CB_COMPOUND procedure. Therefore, if an operation
incurred an error, then the "status" value will be the same error value
as is being returned for the operation that failed.
</t>
<t>
The "tag" field is handled the same way as that of the COMPOUND
procedure (see <xref target="OP_COMPOUND_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
Illegal operation codes are handled in the same way as they are
handled for the COMPOUND procedure.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="PROC_CB_COMPOUND_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The CB_COMPOUND procedure is used to combine individual operations
into a single RPC request. The client interprets each of the
operations in turn. If an operation is executed by the client and
the status of that operation is NFS4_OK, then the next operation in
the CB_COMPOUND procedure is executed. The client continues this
process until there are no more operations to be executed or one of
the operations has a status value other than NFS4_OK.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_COMPOUND_ERRORS" numbered="true">
<name>ERRORS</name>
<t>
CB_COMPOUND will of course return every error that each operation on
the backchannel can return (see <xref target="cb_op_error_returns" format="default"/>).
However, if CB_COMPOUND returns zero operations, obviously the error
returned by COMPOUND has nothing to do with an error returned by
an operation. The list of errors CB_COMPOUND will return if it processes
zero operations includes:
</t>
<table anchor="CB_compounderrs" align="center">
<name>CB_COMPOUND Error Returns</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Error</th>
<th align="left">Notes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADCHAR</td>
<td align="left">The tag argument has a character the replier
does not support. </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_BADXDR</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_DELAY</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_INVAL</td>
<td align="left">The tag argument is not in UTF-8 encoding.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_TOO_MANY_OPS</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REP_TOO_BIG_TO_CACHE</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NFS4ERR_REQ_TOO_BIG</td>
<td align="left"> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
</section>
<!-- $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="nfsv41cboperations" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>NFSv4.1 Callback Operations</name>
<!-- $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_GETATTR" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 3: CB_GETATTR - Get Attributes</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_GETATTR_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_GETATTR4args {
nfs_fh4 fh;
bitmap4 attr_request;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_GETATTR_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_GETATTR4resok {
fattr4 obj_attributes;
};
union CB_GETATTR4res switch (nfsstat4 status) {
case NFS4_OK:
CB_GETATTR4resok resok4;
default:
void;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_GETATTR_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_GETATTR operation is used by the server to obtain the
current modified state of a file that has been OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegated.
The size and change attributes are the only ones guaranteed to be
serviced by the client. See <xref target="handling_cb_getattr" format="default"/> for a full description
of how the client and server are to interact with
the use of CB_GETATTR.
</t>
<t>
If the filehandle specified is not one for which the client holds an
OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegation, an NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE error is returned.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_GETATTR_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The client returns attrmask bits and the associated attribute
values only for the change attribute, and attributes that it may
change (time_modify, and size).
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_RECALL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 4: CB_RECALL - Recall a Delegation</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_RECALL4args {
stateid4 stateid;
bool truncate;
nfs_fh4 fh;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_RECALL4res {
nfsstat4 status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_RECALL operation is used to begin the process of recalling
a delegation and returning it to the server.
</t>
<t>
The truncate flag is used to optimize recall for a file object that
is a regular file and is
about to be truncated to zero. When it is TRUE, the client is freed
of the obligation to propagate modified data for the file to the
server, since this data is irrelevant.
</t>
<t>
If the handle specified is not one for which the client holds a
delegation, an NFS4ERR_BADHANDLE error is returned.
</t>
<t>
If the stateid specified is not one corresponding to an OPEN
delegation for the file specified by the filehandle, an
NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID is returned.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The client <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> reply to the callback immediately.
Replying does not complete the recall except when
the value of the reply's status field is neither
NFS4ERR_DELAY nor NFS4_OK. The recall is not complete
until the delegation is returned using a DELEGRETURN
operation.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 5: CB_LAYOUTRECALL - Recall Layout from Client</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* NFSv4.1 callback arguments and results
*/
enum layoutrecall_type4 {
LAYOUTRECALL4_FILE = LAYOUT4_RET_REC_FILE,
LAYOUTRECALL4_FSID = LAYOUT4_RET_REC_FSID,
LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL = LAYOUT4_RET_REC_ALL
};
struct layoutrecall_file4 {
nfs_fh4 lor_fh;
offset4 lor_offset;
length4 lor_length;
stateid4 lor_stateid;
};
union layoutrecall4 switch(layoutrecall_type4 lor_recalltype) {
case LAYOUTRECALL4_FILE:
layoutrecall_file4 lor_layout;
case LAYOUTRECALL4_FSID:
fsid4 lor_fsid;
case LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL:
void;
};
struct CB_LAYOUTRECALL4args {
layouttype4 clora_type;
layoutiomode4 clora_iomode;
bool clora_changed;
layoutrecall4 clora_recall;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_LAYOUTRECALL4res {
nfsstat4 clorr_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_LAYOUTRECALL operation is used by the server to recall
layouts from the client; as a result, the client will begin the
process of returning layouts via LAYOUTRETURN. The
CB_LAYOUTRECALL operation specifies one of three forms of recall
processing with the value of layoutrecall_type4. The recall is
for one of the following: a specific layout of a specific file
(LAYOUTRECALL4_FILE), an entire file system ID
(LAYOUTRECALL4_FSID), or all file systems (LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL).
</t>
<t>
The behavior of the operation varies based on the value of the
layoutrecall_type4. The value and behaviors are:
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>LAYOUTRECALL4_FILE</dt>
<dd>
For a layout to match the recall request, the values of the following fields
must match those of the layout: clora_type, clora_iomode,
lor_fh, and the byte-range specified by lor_offset and
lor_length. The clora_iomode field may have a special value
of LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY. The special value LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY will match any
iomode originally returned in a layout; therefore, it acts as a
wild card. The other special value used is for
lor_length. If lor_length has a value of NFS4_UINT64_MAX, the
lor_length field means the maximum possible file size. If a
matching layout is found, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned using the
LAYOUTRETURN operation (see <xref target="OP_LAYOUTRETURN" format="default"/>).
An example of the field's special value use is if clora_iomode
is LAYOUTIOMODE4_ANY, lor_offset is zero, and lor_length is
NFS4_UINT64_MAX, then the entire layout is to be returned.
</dd>
<dt/>
<dd>
The NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT error is only returned when the
client does not hold layouts for the file or if the client
does not have any overlapping layouts for the specification in
the layout recall.
</dd>
<dt>LAYOUTRECALL4_FSID and LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL</dt>
<dd>
If LAYOUTRECALL4_FSID is specified, the fsid specifies the
file system for which any outstanding layouts <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be
returned. If LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL is specified, all outstanding
layouts <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned. In addition, LAYOUTRECALL4_FSID and
LAYOUTRECALL4_ALL specify that all the storage device ID to
storage device address mappings in the affected file system(s)
are also recalled. The respective LAYOUTRETURN with either
LAYOUTRETURN4_FSID or LAYOUTRETURN4_ALL acknowledges to the
server that the client invalidated the said device mappings.
See <xref target="bulk_layouts" format="default"/> for considerations with
"bulk" recall of layouts.
</dd>
<dt/>
<dd>
The NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT error is only returned when the
client does not hold layouts and does not have valid deviceid
mappings.
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
In processing the layout recall request, the client also varies
its behavior based on the value of the clora_changed field. This
field is used by the server to provide additional context for
the reason why the layout is being recalled. A FALSE value for
clora_changed indicates that no change in the layout is expected
and the client may write modified data to the storage devices
involved; this must be done prior to returning the layout via
LAYOUTRETURN. A TRUE value for clora_changed indicates that the
server is changing the layout. Examples of layout changes and
reasons for a TRUE indication are the following: the metadata server is restriping
the file or a permanent error has occurred on a storage device
and the metadata server would like to provide a new layout for
the file. Therefore, a clora_changed value of TRUE indicates
some level of change for the layout and the client <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>
write and commit modified data to the storage devices. In this
case, the client writes and commits data through the metadata
server.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="layout_stateid" format="default"/> for a description of how the
lor_stateid field in the arguments is to be constructed. Note
that the "seqid" field of lor_stateid <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be zero. See Sections
<xref target="stateid" format="counter"/>, <xref target="layout_stateid" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="pnfs_operation_sequencing" format="counter"/> for a further
discussion and requirements.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_LAYOUTRECALL_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The client's processing for CB_LAYOUTRECALL is similar to
CB_RECALL (recall of file delegations) in that
the client responds to
the request before actually returning layouts via the
LAYOUTRETURN operation. While the client responds to the
CB_LAYOUTRECALL immediately, the operation is not considered
complete (i.e., considered pending) until all affected layouts are returned to the server
via the LAYOUTRETURN operation.
</t>
<t>
Before returning the layout to the server via LAYOUTRETURN, the
client should wait for the response from in-process or in-flight
READ, WRITE, or COMMIT operations that use the recalled layout.
</t>
<t>
If the client is holding modified data that is affected by a
recalled layout, the client has various options for writing the
data to the server. As always, the client may write the data
through the metadata server. In fact, the client may not have a
choice other than writing to the metadata server when the
clora_changed argument is TRUE and a new layout is unavailable
from the server. However, the client may be able to write the
modified data to the storage device if the clora_changed
argument is FALSE; this needs to be done before returning the
layout via LAYOUTRETURN. If the client were to obtain a new
layout covering the modified data's byte-range, then writing to the
storage devices is an available alternative. Note that before
obtaining a new layout, the client must first return the
original layout.
</t>
<t>
In the case of modified data being written while the layout is
held, the client must use LAYOUTCOMMIT operations at the
appropriate time; as required LAYOUTCOMMIT must be done before
the LAYOUTRETURN. If a large amount of modified data is
outstanding, the client may send LAYOUTRETURNs for portions of
the recalled layout; this allows the server to monitor the
client's progress and adherence to the original recall request.
However, the last LAYOUTRETURN in a sequence of returns <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
specify the full range being recalled (see <xref target="recall_robustness" format="default"/> for details).
</t>
<t>
If a server needs to delete a device ID and there are layouts
referring to the device ID, CB_LAYOUTRECALL <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be invoked to
cause the client to return all layouts referring to the device ID
before the server can delete the device ID. If the client
does not return the affected layouts, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> revoke
the layouts.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 6: CB_NOTIFY - Notify Client of Directory Changes</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* Directory notification types.
*/
enum notify_type4 {
NOTIFY4_CHANGE_CHILD_ATTRS = 0,
NOTIFY4_CHANGE_DIR_ATTRS = 1,
NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY = 2,
NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY = 3,
NOTIFY4_RENAME_ENTRY = 4,
NOTIFY4_CHANGE_COOKIE_VERIFIER = 5
};
/* Changed entry information. */
struct notify_entry4 {
component4 ne_file;
fattr4 ne_attrs;
};
/* Previous entry information */
struct prev_entry4 {
notify_entry4 pe_prev_entry;
/* what READDIR returned for this entry */
nfs_cookie4 pe_prev_entry_cookie;
};
struct notify_remove4 {
notify_entry4 nrm_old_entry;
nfs_cookie4 nrm_old_entry_cookie;
};
struct notify_add4 {
/*
* Information on object
* possibly renamed over.
*/
notify_remove4 nad_old_entry<1>;
notify_entry4 nad_new_entry;
/* what READDIR would have returned for this entry */
nfs_cookie4 nad_new_entry_cookie<1>;
prev_entry4 nad_prev_entry<1>;
bool nad_last_entry;
};
struct notify_attr4 {
notify_entry4 na_changed_entry;
};
struct notify_rename4 {
notify_remove4 nrn_old_entry;
notify_add4 nrn_new_entry;
};
struct notify_verifier4 {
verifier4 nv_old_cookieverf;
verifier4 nv_new_cookieverf;
};
/*
* Objects of type notify_<>4 and
* notify_device_<>4 are encoded in this.
*/
typedef opaque notifylist4<>;
struct notify4 {
/* composed from notify_type4 or notify_deviceid_type4 */
bitmap4 notify_mask;
notifylist4 notify_vals;
};
struct CB_NOTIFY4args {
stateid4 cna_stateid;
nfs_fh4 cna_fh;
notify4 cna_changes<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_NOTIFY4res {
nfsstat4 cnr_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_NOTIFY operation is used by the server to
send notifications to clients about changes to
delegated directories.
The registration of notifications for the directories
occurs when the delegation is established using
GET_DIR_DELEGATION.
These notifications are sent over the backchannel. The
notification is sent once the original request has been
processed on the server. The server will send an array of
notifications for changes that might have occurred in the
directory. The notifications are sent as list of pairs of
bitmaps and values.
See <xref target="fattr4" format="default"/>
for a description of how NFSv4.1 bitmaps work.
</t>
<t>
If the server has more notifications than can fit in
the CB_COMPOUND request, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> send a sequence of
serial CB_COMPOUND requests so that the client's view
of the directory does not become confused. For example, if the
server indicates that a file named "foo" is added and that the
file "foo" is removed, the order in which the client receives
these notifications needs to be the same as the
order in which the corresponding operations occurred on the server.
</t>
<t>
If the client holding the delegation makes any
changes in the directory that cause files or sub-directories to
be added or removed, the server will
notify that client of the resulting change(s). If the
client holding the delegation is making attribute
or cookie verifier changes only, the server does
not need to send notifications to that client.
The server will send the following information for
each operation:
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>NOTIFY4_ADD_ENTRY</dt>
<dd>
The server will send
information about the new directory entry being created along with the
cookie for that entry. The entry information (data type
notify_add4) includes the component name of the entry and
attributes. The server will send this type of entry when a
file is actually being created, when an entry is being added
to a directory as a result of a rename across directories
(see below), and when a hard link is being created to an
existing file. If this entry is added to the end of the
directory, the server will set the nad_last_entry flag to
TRUE. If the file is added such that there is at least one
entry before it, the server will also return the previous
entry information (nad_prev_entry, a variable-length array
of up to one element. If the array is of zero length, there
is no previous entry), along with its cookie. This is to
help clients find the right location in their file name caches and
directory caches where this entry should be cached. If the
new entry's cookie is available, it will be in
the nad_new_entry_cookie (another variable-length array of up to
one element) field. If the addition of the entry causes another
entry to be deleted (which can only happen in the rename
case) atomically with the addition, then information on
this entry is reported in nad_old_entry.
</dd>
<dt>NOTIFY4_REMOVE_ENTRY</dt>
<dd>
The server will send information about the directory entry
being deleted. The server will also send the cookie value
for the deleted entry so that clients can get to the cached
information for this entry.
</dd>
<dt>NOTIFY4_RENAME_ENTRY</dt>
<dd>
The server will send information about both
the old entry and the new entry. This includes the name and
attributes for each entry. In addition, if the rename
causes the deletion of an entry (i.e., the case of a file
renamed over), then this is reported in
nrn_new_new_entry.nad_old_entry.
This notification is only sent if
both entries are in the same directory. If the rename is
across directories, the server will send a remove
notification to one directory and an add notification to the
other directory, assuming both have a directory delegation.
</dd>
<dt>NOTIFY4_CHANGE_CHILD_ATTRS/NOTIFY4_CHANGE_DIR_ATTRS</dt>
<dd>
The client will use the attribute
mask to inform the server of attributes for which it wants to
receive notifications. This change notification can be
requested for changes to the attributes of the directory
as well as changes to any file's attributes in the directory by
using two separate attribute masks. The client cannot ask
for change attribute notification for a specific file. One attribute
mask covers all the files in the directory. Upon any
attribute change, the server will send back the values of
changed attributes. Notifications might not make sense for
some file system-wide attributes, and it is up to the server to
decide which subset it wants to support. The client can
negotiate the frequency of attribute notifications by letting
the server know how often it wants to be notified of an
attribute change. The server will return supported
notification frequencies or an indication that no
notification is permitted for directory or child attributes
by setting the dir_notif_delay and
dir_entry_notif_delay attributes, respectively.
</dd>
<dt>NOTIFY4_CHANGE_COOKIE_VERIFIER</dt>
<dd>
If the cookie verifier changes while
a client is holding a delegation, the server will notify the
client so that it can invalidate its cookies and re-send a
READDIR to get the new set of cookies.
</dd>
</dl>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 7: CB_PUSH_DELEG - Offer Previously Requested Delegation to Client</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_PUSH_DELEG4args {
nfs_fh4 cpda_fh;
open_delegation4 cpda_delegation;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_PUSH_DELEG4res {
nfsstat4 cpdr_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
CB_PUSH_DELEG is used by the server both to signal to the
client that the delegation it wants (previously indicated
via a want established from an
OPEN or WANT_DELEGATION operation) is available and to
simultaneously offer the delegation to the client. The client
has the choice of accepting the delegation by returning
NFS4_OK to the server, delaying the decision to accept the
offered delegation by returning NFS4ERR_DELAY,
or permanently rejecting the offer of the
delegation by returning NFS4ERR_REJECT_DELEG.
When a delegation is rejected in this fashion, the want
previously established is permanently deleted and the delegation
is subject to acquisition by another client.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_PUSH_DELEG_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the client does return NFS4ERR_DELAY
and there is a conflicting delegation request, the server <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
process it at the expense of the client that returned
NFS4ERR_DELAY. The client's want will not be cancelled, but
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be processed behind other delegation requests or registered
wants.
</t>
<t>
When a client returns a status other than NFS4_OK, NFS4ERR_DELAY,
or NFS4ERR_REJECT_DELAY, the want remains pending, although
servers may decide to cancel the want by sending a CB_WANTS_CANCELLED.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 8: CB_RECALL_ANY - Keep Any N Recallable Objects</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_RDATA_DLG = 0;
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_WDATA_DLG = 1;
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_DIR_DLG = 2;
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_FILE_LAYOUT = 3;
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_BLK_LAYOUT = 4;
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OBJ_LAYOUT_MIN = 8;
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OBJ_LAYOUT_MAX = 9;
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OTHER_LAYOUT_MIN = 12;
const RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OTHER_LAYOUT_MAX = 15;
struct CB_RECALL_ANY4args {
uint32_t craa_objects_to_keep;
bitmap4 craa_type_mask;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_RECALL_ANY4res {
nfsstat4 crar_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The server may decide that it cannot hold all of the state for
recallable objects, such as delegations and layouts, without
running out of resources. In such a case, while not optimal,
the server is free to recall individual objects to reduce the load.
</t>
<t>
Because the general purpose of such recallable objects as
delegations is to eliminate client interaction with the server,
the server cannot interpret lack of recent use as indicating
that the object is no longer useful. The absence of visible
use is consistent with a delegation keeping potential operations
from being sent to the server. In the case of layouts, while it
is true that the usefulness of a layout
is indicated by the use of the layout when storage devices receive
I/O requests, because there is no mandate that a storage
device indicate to the metadata server any past or
present use of a layout, the metadata server is not likely to know
which layouts are good candidates to recall in response to
low resources.
</t>
<t>
In order to implement an effective reclaim scheme for such
objects, the server's knowledge of available resources must be
used to determine when objects must be recalled with the
clients selecting the actual objects to be returned.
</t>
<t>
Server implementations may differ in their resource allocation
requirements. For example, one server may share resources among
all classes of recallable objects, whereas another may use
separate resource pools for layouts and for delegations, or
further separate resources by types of delegations.
</t>
<t>
When a given resource pool is over-utilized, the server can
send a CB_RECALL_ANY to clients holding recallable objects of
the types involved, allowing it to keep a certain number of
such objects and return any excess. A mask specifies which
types of objects are to be limited. The client chooses, based
on its own knowledge of current usefulness, which of the objects
in that class should be returned.
</t>
<t>
A number of bits are defined. For some of these, ranges
are defined and it is up to the definition of the storage
protocol to specify how these are to be used. There are ranges
reserved for object-based storage
protocols and for other experimental storage
protocols. An RFC defining such a storage protocol needs to
specify how particular bits within its range are to be used.
For example, it may specify a mapping between attributes of
the layout (read vs. write, size of area) and the bit to be
used, or it may define a field in the layout where the associated
bit position is made available by the server to the client.
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>RCA4_TYPE_MASK_RDATA_DLG</dt>
<dd>
The client is to return OPEN_DELEGATE_READ delegations on
non-directory file objects.
</dd>
<dt>RCA4_TYPE_MASK_WDATA_DLG</dt>
<dd>
The client is to return OPEN_DELEGATE_WRITE delegations on
regular file objects.
</dd>
<dt>RCA4_TYPE_MASK_DIR_DLG</dt>
<dd>
The client is to return directory delegations.
</dd>
<dt>RCA4_TYPE_MASK_FILE_LAYOUT</dt>
<dd>
The client is to return layouts of type LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES.
</dd>
<dt>RCA4_TYPE_MASK_BLK_LAYOUT</dt>
<dd>
See <xref target="RFC5663" format="default"/> for a description.
</dd>
<dt>RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OBJ_LAYOUT_MIN to RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OBJ_LAYOUT_MAX</dt>
<dd>
See <xref target="RFC5664" format="default"/> for a description.
</dd>
<dt>RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OTHER_LAYOUT_MIN to RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OTHER_LAYOUT_MAX</dt>
<dd>
This range is reserved for telling the client to recall
layouts of experimental
or site-specific layout types (see <xref target="layouttype4" format="default"/>).
</dd>
</dl>
<t>
When a bit is set in the type mask that corresponds
to an undefined type of recallable object,
NFS4ERR_INVAL <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned. When a bit is set
that corresponds to a defined type of object but
the client does not support an object of the type,
NFS4ERR_INVAL <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be returned. Future minor
versions of NFSv4 may expand the set of valid type
mask bits.
</t>
<t>
CB_RECALL_ANY specifies a count of objects that the client may
keep as opposed to a count that the client must return. This
is to avoid a potential race between a CB_RECALL_ANY that had a
count of objects to free with a set of client-originated
operations to return layouts or delegations. As a result of the
race, the client and server would have differing ideas as to how
many objects to return. Hence, the client could mistakenly free
too many.
</t>
<t>
If resource demands prompt it, the server may send another
CB_RECALL_ANY with a lower count, even if it has not yet received
an acknowledgment from the client for a previous CB_RECALL_ANY
with the same type mask. Although the possibility exists that
these will be received by the client in an order different from
the order in which they were sent, any such permutation of
the callback stream is harmless. It is the job of the client
to bring down the size of the recallable object set in line
with each CB_RECALL_ANY received, and until that obligation is
met, it cannot be cancelled or modified by any subsequent
CB_RECALL_ANY for the same type mask. Thus, if the server
sends two CB_RECALL_ANYs, the effect will be the same as
if the lower count was sent, whatever the order of recall
receipt. Note that this means that a server may not cancel
the effect of a CB_RECALL_ANY by sending another recall with
a higher count. When a CB_RECALL_ANY is received and the
count is already within the limit set or is above a limit
that the client is working to get down to, that callback has no
effect.
</t>
<t>
Servers are generally free to deny recallable objects
when insufficient resources are available. Note that the
effect of such a policy is implicitly to give precedence to
existing objects relative to requested ones, with the result
that resources might not be optimally used. To prevent this,
servers are well advised to make the point at which they start
sending CB_RECALL_ANY callbacks somewhat below that at which they
cease to give out new delegations and layouts. This allows the
client to purge its less-used objects whenever appropriate and
so continue to have its subsequent requests given new resources
freed up by object returns.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The client can choose to return any type of object specified
by the mask. If a server wishes to limit the use of objects of a
specific type, it should only specify that type in the mask
it sends. Should the client fail to return requested objects, it is
up to the server to handle this situation, typically by sending
specific recalls (i.e., sending CB_RECALL operations)
to properly limit resource usage. The server
should give the client enough time to return objects before
proceeding to specific recalls. This time should not be less
than the lease period.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 9: CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL - Signal Resources for Recallable Objects</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
typedef CB_RECALL_ANY4args CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL4args;
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL4res {
nfsstat4 croa_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL is used by the server to signal the
client that the server has resources to grant recallable
objects that might previously have been denied by OPEN,
WANT_DELEGATION, GET_DIR_DELEG, or LAYOUTGET.
</t>
<t>
The argument craa_objects_to_keep means the total number of
recallable objects of the types indicated in the argument
type_mask that the server believes it can allow the client to
have, including the number of such objects the client already
has. A client that tries to acquire more recallable objects
than the server informs it can have runs the risk of having
objects recalled.
</t>
<t>
The server is not obligated to reserve the
difference between the number of the objects
the client currently has and the value of
craa_objects_to_keep, nor does delaying the reply
to CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL prevent the server
from using the resources of the recallable objects
for another purpose. Indeed, if a client responds
slowly to CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL, the server might
interpret the client as having reduced capability
to manage recallable objects, and so cancel
or reduce any reservation it is maintaining on behalf
of the client.
Thus, if the client desires to acquire more
recallable objects, it needs to reply quickly
to CB_RECALLABLE_OBJ_AVAIL, and then send the
appropriate operations to acquire recallable
objects.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 10: CB_RECALL_SLOT - Change Flow Control Limits</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_RECALL_SLOT4args {
slotid4 rsa_target_highest_slotid;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_RECALL_SLOT4res {
nfsstat4 rsr_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_RECALL_SLOT operation requests the client to
return session slots, and if applicable, transport
credits (e.g., RDMA credits for connections associated with
the operations channel) of the session's fore channel.
CB_RECALL_SLOT specifies
rsa_target_highest_slotid, the value of the target highest slot ID the server wants
for the session. The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> then progress toward reducing
the session's highest slot ID to the target value.
</t>
<t>
If the session has only non-RDMA connections associated with its
operations channel, then the client need only wait
for all outstanding requests with a slot ID &gt;
rsa_target_highest_slotid to complete, then send
a single COMPOUND consisting of a single SEQUENCE operation,
with the sa_highestslot field set to rsa_target_highest_slotid.
If there are RDMA-based connections associated with
operation channel, then the client needs to also
send enough zero-length "RDMA Send" messages to take the total
<!-- [auth] Please leave this use of "Send" capitalized in order to denote
an artifact particular to RDMA-based communication. Thanks. -->
RDMA credit count to rsa_target_highest_slotid + 1 or below.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_RECALL_SLOT_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
If the client fails to reduce highest slot it has on the fore channel
to what the server requests, the server can force the issue
by asserting flow control on the receive side of
all connections bound to the fore channel, and then
finish servicing all outstanding requests that are
in slots greater than rsa_target_highest_slotid. Once that
is done, the server can then open the flow control, and any time
the client sends a new request on a slot greater than
rsa_target_highest_slotid, the server can return NFS4ERR_BADSLOT.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_SEQUENCE" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 11: CB_SEQUENCE - Supply Backchannel Sequencing and Control</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_SEQUENCE_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct referring_call4 {
sequenceid4 rc_sequenceid;
slotid4 rc_slotid;
};
struct referring_call_list4 {
sessionid4 rcl_sessionid;
referring_call4 rcl_referring_calls<>;
};
struct CB_SEQUENCE4args {
sessionid4 csa_sessionid;
sequenceid4 csa_sequenceid;
slotid4 csa_slotid;
slotid4 csa_highest_slotid;
bool csa_cachethis;
referring_call_list4 csa_referring_call_lists<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_SEQUENCE_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_SEQUENCE4resok {
sessionid4 csr_sessionid;
sequenceid4 csr_sequenceid;
slotid4 csr_slotid;
slotid4 csr_highest_slotid;
slotid4 csr_target_highest_slotid;
};
union CB_SEQUENCE4res switch (nfsstat4 csr_status) {
case NFS4_OK:
CB_SEQUENCE4resok csr_resok4;
default:
void;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_SEQUENCE_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_SEQUENCE operation is used to manage operational accounting
for the backchannel of the session on which a request is
sent. The contents include the session ID to which this
request belongs, the slot ID and sequence ID used by the server to
implement session request control and exactly once
semantics, and exchanged slot ID maxima that are used to adjust the
size of the reply cache. In each CB_COMPOUND request, CB_SEQUENCE
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> appear once and <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be the first operation. The error
NFS4ERR_SEQUENCE_POS <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned when CB_SEQUENCE is found in
any position in a CB_COMPOUND beyond the first. If any
other operation is in the first position of CB_COMPOUND,
NFS4ERR_OP_NOT_IN_SESSION <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be returned.
</t>
<t>
See <xref target="OP_SEQUENCE_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/> for a description of
how slots are processed.
</t>
<t>
If csa_cachethis is TRUE, then the server is requesting that
the client cache the reply in the callback reply cache. The client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
cache the reply (see <xref target="optional_reply_caching" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
The csa_referring_call_lists array is the list of COMPOUND
requests, identified by session ID, slot ID, and sequence ID. These
are requests that the client previously sent to the server.
These previous requests created state that some operation(s)
in the same CB_COMPOUND as the csa_referring_call_lists are
identifying.
A session ID is included because
leased state is tied to a client ID, and a client ID can have
multiple sessions. See
<xref target="sessions_callback_races" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
The value of the csa_sequenceid argument relative to
the cached sequence ID on the slot falls into one
of three cases.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
If the difference between csa_sequenceid and
the client's cached sequence ID at the slot ID
is two (2) or more,
or if csa_sequenceid is less
than the cached sequence ID (accounting
for wraparound of the unsigned sequence ID value),
then the client <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> return NFS4ERR_SEQ_MISORDERED.
</li>
<li>
If csa_sequenceid and the cached sequence ID are the
same, this is a retry, and the client returns the
CB_COMPOUND request's cached reply.
</li>
<li>
If csa_sequenceid is one greater (accounting for
wraparound) than the cached sequence ID, then
this is a new request, and the slot's sequence
ID is incremented. The operations subsequent to
CB_SEQUENCE, if any, are processed. If there are no
other operations, the only other effects are to
cache the CB_SEQUENCE reply in the slot, maintain the
session's activity, and when the server receives the
CB_SEQUENCE reply, renew the lease of state
related to the client ID.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
If the server reuses a slot ID and sequence ID for
a completely different request, the client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14>
treat the request as if it is a retry
of what it has already executed. The client <bcp14>MAY</bcp14> however
detect the server's illegal reuse and return NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY.
</t>
<t>
If CB_SEQUENCE returns an error, then the state of the slot (sequence ID,
cached reply) <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> change.
See <xref target="optional_reply_caching" format="default"/> for the conditions when the
error NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP might be returned.
</t>
<t>
The client returns two "highest_slotid" values:
csr_highest_slotid and csr_target_highest_slotid. The
former is the highest slot ID the client will accept
in a future CB_SEQUENCE operation, and <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be
less than the value of csa_highest_slotid (but see
<xref target="Slot_Identifiers_and_Server_Reply_Cache" format="default"/> for an exception). The latter is the highest slot
ID the client would prefer the server use on a future
CB_SEQUENCE operation.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 12: CB_WANTS_CANCELLED - Cancel Pending Delegation Wants</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_WANTS_CANCELLED4args {
bool cwca_contended_wants_cancelled;
bool cwca_resourced_wants_cancelled;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_WANTS_CANCELLED4res {
nfsstat4 cwcr_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_WANTS_CANCELLED operation is used to notify the client that
some or all of the wants it registered for recallable delegations and layouts
have been cancelled.
</t>
<t>
If cwca_contended_wants_cancelled is TRUE, this indicates that
the server will not be pushing to the client any delegations
that become available after contention passes.
</t>
<t>
If cwca_resourced_wants_cancelled is TRUE, this indicates that
the server will not notify the client when there are resources
on the server to grant delegations or layouts.
</t>
<t>
After receiving a CB_WANTS_CANCELLED operation, the
client is free to attempt to acquire the delegations or
layouts it was waiting for, and possibly re-register wants.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_WANTS_CANCELLED_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
When a client has an OPEN, WANT_DELEGATION, or GET_DIR_DELEGATION request
outstanding, when a CB_WANTS_CANCELLED is sent, the server may need to
make clear to the client whether a promise to signal delegation availability
happened before the CB_WANTS_CANCELLED and is thus covered by it, or after
the CB_WANTS_CANCELLED in which case it was not covered by it. The server
can make this distinction by putting the appropriate requests into the
list of referring calls in the associated CB_SEQUENCE.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 13: CB_NOTIFY_LOCK - Notify Client of Possible Lock Availability</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_NOTIFY_LOCK4args {
nfs_fh4 cnla_fh;
lock_owner4 cnla_lock_owner;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_NOTIFY_LOCK4res {
nfsstat4 cnlr_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The server can use this operation to indicate that a byte-range lock for the given
file and lock-owner, previously requested by the client via an unsuccessful
LOCK operation, might be available.
</t>
<t>
This callback is meant to be used by servers to help reduce the latency of
blocking locks in the case where they recognize that a client that has
been polling for a blocking byte-range lock may now be able to acquire the lock.
If the server supports this callback for a given file, it <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> set the
OPEN4_RESULT_MAY_NOTIFY_LOCK flag when responding to successful opens
for that file. This does not commit the server to the use of CB_NOTIFY_LOCK,
but the client may use this as a hint to decide how frequently to poll
for locks derived from that open.
</t>
<t>
If an OPEN operation results in an upgrade, in which the stateid returned
has an "other" value matching that of a stateid already allocated, with a
new "seqid" indicating a change in the lock being represented, then the
value of the OPEN4_RESULT_MAY_NOTIFY_LOCK flag when responding to that new
OPEN controls handling from that point going forward. When parallel OPENs
are done on the same file and open-owner, the ordering of the "seqid" fields
of the returned stateids (subject to wraparound) are to be used to select
the controlling value of the OPEN4_RESULT_MAY_NOTIFY_LOCK flag.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_LOCK_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
The server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> grant the byte-range lock to the client unless and until it
receives a LOCK operation from the client. Similarly, the client
receiving this callback cannot assume that it now has the lock or that a
subsequent LOCK operation for the lock will be successful.
</t>
<t>
The server is not required to implement this callback, and even if it
does, it is not required to use it in any particular case. Therefore, the
client must still rely on polling for blocking locks, as described in
<xref target="blocking_locks" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Similarly, the client is not required to implement this callback, and even
it does, is still free to ignore it. Therefore, the server <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> assume
that the client will act based on the callback.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 14: CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID - Notify Client of Device ID Changes</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* Device notification types.
*/
enum notify_deviceid_type4 {
NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE = 1,
NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE = 2
};
/* For NOTIFY4_DEVICEID4_DELETE */
struct notify_deviceid_delete4 {
layouttype4 ndd_layouttype;
deviceid4 ndd_deviceid;
};
/* For NOTIFY4_DEVICEID4_CHANGE */
struct notify_deviceid_change4 {
layouttype4 ndc_layouttype;
deviceid4 ndc_deviceid;
bool ndc_immediate;
};
struct CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID4args {
notify4 cnda_changes<>;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
struct CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID4res {
nfsstat4 cndr_status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
The CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID operation is used by the
server to send notifications to clients about
changes to pNFS device IDs. The registration of
device ID notifications is optional and is done via
GETDEVICEINFO. These notifications are sent
over the backchannel
once the original request has been processed
on the server. The server will send an array of
notifications, cnda_changes, as a list of pairs of
bitmaps and values. See <xref target="fattr4" format="default"/>
for a description of how NFSv4.1 bitmaps work.
</t>
<t>
As with CB_NOTIFY (<xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/>), it is
possible the server has more notifications than
can fit in a CB_COMPOUND, thus requiring multiple
CB_COMPOUNDs. Unlike CB_NOTIFY, serialization is not
an issue because unlike directory entries, device
IDs cannot be re-used after being deleted (<xref target="device_ids" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
All device ID notifications contain a device ID and a
layout type. The layout type is necessary because two
different layout types can share the same device ID,
and the common device ID can have completely different
mappings for each layout type.
</t>
<t>
The server will send the following notifications:
</t>
<dl newline="true" spacing="normal">
<dt>NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE</dt>
<dd>
A previously provided device-ID-to-device-address
mapping has changed and the client uses
GETDEVICEINFO to obtain the
updated mapping.
The notification is encoded in a value of data
type notify_deviceid_change4. This data type
also contains a boolean field, ndc_immediate,
which if TRUE indicates that the change will be
enforced immediately, and so the client might not
be able to complete any pending I/O to the device
ID. If ndc_immediate is FALSE, then for an
indefinite time, the client can complete pending
I/O. After pending I/O is complete, the client
<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> get the new device-ID-to-device-address
mappings before sending new I/O requests to the
storage devices addressed by the device ID.
</dd>
<dt>NOTIFY4_DEVICEID_DELETE</dt>
<dd>
<t>
Deletes a device ID from the mappings. This
notification <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be sent if the client has
a layout that refers to the device ID. In other
words, if the server is sending a delete device ID
notification, one of the following is true for layouts
associated with the layout type:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The client never had a layout referring to that device ID.
</li>
<li>
The client has returned all layouts referring to that device ID.
</li>
<li>
The server has revoked all layouts referring to that device ID.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The notification is encoded in a value of data
type notify_deviceid_delete4.
After a server deletes a device ID, it <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>
reuse that device ID for the same layout type until the
client ID is deleted.
</t>
</dd>
</dl>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="OP_CB_ILLEGAL" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Operation 10044: CB_ILLEGAL - Illegal Callback Operation</name>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_ILLEGAL_ARGUMENT" numbered="true">
<name>ARGUMENT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
void;
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_ILLEGAL_RESULT" numbered="true">
<name>RESULT</name>
<sourcecode type="xdr"><![CDATA[
/*
* CB_ILLEGAL: Response for illegal operation numbers
*/
struct CB_ILLEGAL4res {
nfsstat4 status;
};
]]></sourcecode>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_ILLEGAL_DESCRIPTION" numbered="true">
<name>DESCRIPTION</name>
<t>
This operation is a placeholder for encoding a
result to handle the case of the server sending
an operation code within CB_COMPOUND that is not
defined in the NFSv4.1 specification. See <xref target="OP_CB_COMPOUND_DESCRIPTION" format="default"/> for more details.
</t>
<t>
The status field of CB_ILLEGAL4res <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be set to
NFS4ERR_OP_ILLEGAL.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" anchor="OP_CB_ILLEGAL_IMPLEMENTATION" numbered="true">
<name>IMPLEMENTATION</name>
<t>
A server will probably not send an operation with code
OP_CB_ILLEGAL, but if it does, the response will be CB_ILLEGAL4res
just as it would be with any other invalid operation code. Note
that if the client gets an illegal operation code that is not
OP_ILLEGAL, and if the client checks for legal operation codes
during the XDR decode phase, then an instance of
data type CB_ILLEGAL4res will not be returned.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
</section>
<!-- $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="SECCON" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Considerations</name>
<t>
Historically, the authentication model of NFS
was based on the entire machine being the NFS client, with the
NFS server trusting the NFS client
to authenticate the end-user.
The NFS server in turn shared its files only to
specific clients, as identified by the client's source
network address. Given this model, the AUTH_SYS
RPC security flavor simply identified the end-user
using the client to the NFS server. When processing
NFS responses, the client ensured that the responses
came from the same network address and port number
to which the request was sent. While such a model is
easy to implement and simple to deploy and use, it is
unsafe. Thus, NFSv4.1
implementations are <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> to support a security model that uses
end-to-end authentication, where an end-user on a client
mutually authenticates (via cryptographic schemes that
do not expose passwords or keys in the clear on the
network) to a principal on an NFS server. Consideration
is also given to the integrity and privacy of
NFS requests and responses. The issues of end-to-end
mutual authentication, integrity, and privacy are
discussed in <xref target="RPCSEC_GSS_and_Security_Services" format="default"/>.
There are specific considerations when using Kerberos V5 as described
in <xref target="krb5_sec_consider" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
Note that being <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> to implement does not mean <bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14> to
use; AUTH_SYS can be used by NFSv4.1 clients and servers.
However, AUTH_SYS is merely an <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> security flavor in NFSv4.1,
and so interoperability via AUTH_SYS is not assured.
</t>
<t>
For reasons of reduced administration overhead, better
performance, and/or reduction of CPU utilization,
users of NFSv4.1 implementations might decline to use
security mechanisms that enable integrity protection
on each remote procedure call and response. The
use of mechanisms without integrity leaves the user
vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle of the NFS
client and server that modifies the RPC request and/or
the response. While implementations are free to provide
the option to use weaker security mechanisms, there
are three operations in particular that warrant the
implementation overriding user choices.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The first two such operations are SECINFO and
SECINFO_NO_NAME. It is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14> that the client send
both operations such that they are protected with a
security flavor that has integrity protection, such
as RPCSEC_GSS with either the rpc_gss_svc_integrity
or rpc_gss_svc_privacy service. Without integrity
protection encapsulating SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME
and their results, a man-in-the-middle could
modify results such that the client might select a
weaker algorithm in the set allowed by the server, making
the client and/or server vulnerable to further attacks.
</li>
<li>
The third operation that <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> use integrity protection
is any GETATTR for the fs_locations and fs_locations_info attributes,
in order to mitigate the severity of a man-in-the-middle attack.
The attack has two
steps. First the attacker modifies the unprotected results of some
operation to return NFS4ERR_MOVED. Second, when the client follows up
with a GETATTR for the fs_locations or fs_locations_info attributes,
the attacker modifies
the results to cause the client to migrate its traffic to a server
controlled by the attacker. With integrity protection, this attack is mitigated.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Relative to previous NFS versions, NFSv4.1 has additional security
considerations for pNFS (see Sections <xref target="security_considerations_pnfs" format="counter"/>
and <xref target="file_security_considerations" format="counter"/>), locking
and session state (see <xref target="protect_state_change" format="default"/>),
and state recovery during grace period (see <xref target="reclaim_security_considerations" format="default"/>).
With respect to locking and session state, if SP4_SSV state protection
is being used, <xref target="rpcsec_ssv_consider" format="default"/> has specific
security considerations for the NFSv4.1 client and server.
</t>
<t>
Security considerations for lock reclaim differ between the two different
situations in which state reclaim is to be done.
The server failure situation is discussed in
<xref target="reclaim_security_considerations" format="default"/>, while the per-fs state
reclaim done in support of migration/replication is discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-lock-sc" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
The use of the multi-server namespace features described in
<xref target="NEW11" format="default"/> raises
the possibility that requests to determine the set of network
addresses corresponding to a given server might be interfered
with or have their responses modified in flight.
In light of this possibility, the following considerations
should be noted:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
When DNS is used to convert server names to addresses and
DNSSEC <xref target="RFC4033" format="default"/> is not available, the validity of
the network addresses returned generally cannot be relied upon.
However, when combined with a trusted resolver, DNS over TLS
<xref target="RFC7858" format="default"/> and DNS over HTTPS
<xref target="RFC8484" format="default"/> can be relied upon to provide
valid address resolutions.
</t>
<t>
In situations in which the validity of the provided addresses
cannot be relied upon and the client uses RPCSEC_GSS to access the
designated server, it is possible for mutual authentication to
discover invalid server addresses as long as the RPCSEC_GSS
implementation used does not use insecure DNS queries to canonicalize
the hostname components of the service principal names, as
explained in <xref target="RFC4120" format="default"/>.
</t>
</li>
<li>
The fetching of attributes containing file system location
information <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> be
performed using integrity protection. It is important to note here that
a client making a request of this sort without using
integrity protection needs be aware of
the negative consequences of doing so, which can lead to
invalid hostnames or network addresses being returned. These
include cases in which the
client is directed to a server under the control of an
attacker, who might get access to data written or provide
incorrect values for data read. In light of
this, the client needs to recognize that using such returned
location information to access an NFSv4 server
without use of RPCSEC_GSS (i.e.,
by using AUTH_SYS) poses dangers as it can result in the client
interacting with such an attacker-controlled server without
any authentication facilities to verify the server's identity.
</li>
<li>
Despite the fact that it is a requirement that implementations provide
"support" for use of RPCSEC_GSS, it cannot be assumed that
use of RPCSEC_GSS is always available between any particular
client-server pair.
</li>
<li>
When a client has the network addresses of a server but not the
associated hostnames, that would interfere with its ability
to use RPCSEC_GSS.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In light of the above, a server <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> present file system location
entries that correspond to file systems on other servers using a
hostname. This would allow the client to interrogate the
fs_locations on the destination server to obtain trunking information
(as well as replica information) using integrity protection,
validating the name provided while assuring that the response has
not been modified in flight.
</t>
<t>
When RPCSEC_GSS is not available on a server, the client needs
to be aware of the fact that the location entries are subject to
modification in flight and so cannot be relied upon.
In the case of a client being directed to another server after NFS4ERR_MOVED,
this could vitiate the
authentication provided by the use of RPCSEC_GSS on the designated
destination server. Even when RPCSEC_GSS authentication is available
on the destination, the server might still properly authenticate as the
server to which the client was erroneously directed.
Without a way to decide whether
the server is a valid one, the client can only determine, using
RPCSEC_GSS, that the server corresponds to the name provided, with
no basis for trusting that server. As a result, the client <bcp14>SHOULD
NOT</bcp14> use such unverified location entries as a basis for migration,
even though RPCSEC_GSS might be available on the destination.
</t>
<t>
When a file system location attribute is fetched upon connecting with an
NFS server, it <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>, as stated above, be done with integrity protection.
When this not possible, it is generally
best for the client to ignore trunking and replica information or
simply not fetch the location information for these purposes.
</t>
<t>
When location information cannot be verified, it can be subjected
to additional filtering to prevent the client from being
inappropriately directed. For example, if a range of network
addresses can be determined that assure that the servers and
clients using AUTH_SYS are subject to the appropriate set of
constraints (e.g., physical network isolation, administrative
controls on the operating systems used), then network addresses
in the appropriate range can be used with others discarded
or restricted in their use of AUTH_SYS.
</t>
<t>
To summarize considerations regarding the use of RPCSEC_GSS in
fetching location information, we need to consider the following
possibilities for requests to interrogate location information, with
interrogation approaches on the referring and destination servers
arrived at separately:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The use of integrity protection is <bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>
in all cases, since the absence of integrity protection exposes
the client to the possibility of the results being modified in transit.
</li>
<li>
The use of requests issued without RPCSEC_GSS
(i.e., using AUTH_SYS, which has no provision to avoid
modification of data in flight),
while undesirable and a potential security exposure,
may not be avoidable in all cases. Where the use
of the returned information cannot be avoided, it is made
subject to filtering as described above to
eliminate the possibility that the client would
treat an invalid address as if it were a NFSv4 server. The
specifics will vary depending on the degree of network isolation
and whether the request is to the referring or destination servers.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Even if such requests are not interfered with in flight, it is possible
for a compromised server to direct the client to use inappropriate servers,
such as those under the control of the attacker. It is not clear that being
directed to such servers represents a greater threat to the client than the
damage that could be done by the compromised server itself. However, it
is possible that some sorts of transient server compromises might be
exploited to direct a client to a server capable of doing greater
damage over a longer time. One useful step to guard against this
possibility is to issue requests to fetch location data using RPCSEC_GSS,
even if no mapping to an RPCSEC_GSS principal is available. In this case,
RPCSEC_GSS would not be used, as it typically is, to identify the client
principal to the server, but rather to make sure (via RPCSEC_GSS mutual
authentication) that the server being contacted is the one intended.
</t>
<t>
Similar considerations apply if the threat to be avoided is the redirection
of client traffic to inappropriate (i.e., poorly performing) servers. In
both cases, there is no reason for the information returned to depend on
the identity of the client principal requesting it, while the validity of the
server information, which has the capability to affect all client principals,
is of considerable importance.
</t>
</section>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="ianaconsider" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>IANA Considerations</name>
<t>
This section uses terms that are defined in <xref target="RFC8126" format="default"/>.
</t>
<section anchor="Iana-actions" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>IANA Actions</name>
<t>
This update does not require any modification of, or additions to, registry
entries or registry rules associated with NFSv4.1. However, since
this document obsoletes RFC 8881, IANA has updated all registry entries and registry rules references
that point to RFC 5661 to point to this document instead.
</t>
<t>
Previous actions by IANA related to NFSv4.1 are listed in the remaining
subsections of <xref target="ianaconsider" format="default"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="namedattributesiana" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Named Attribute Definitions</name>
<t>
IANA created a registry called the "NFSv4 Named Attribute Definitions Registry".
</t>
<t>
The NFSv4.1 protocol supports the association of a file with zero or
more named attributes. The namespace identifiers for these attributes
are defined as string names. The protocol does not define the
specific assignment of the namespace for these file attributes.
The IANA registry promotes interoperability where common interests exist.
While application developers are allowed to define and use
attributes as needed, they are encouraged to register the
attributes with IANA.
</t>
<t>
Such registered named attributes are presumed to apply to all minor
versions of NFSv4, including those defined subsequently to the
registration. If the named attribute is intended to be
limited to specific minor versions, this will be clearly stated in
the registry's assignment.
</t>
<t>
All assignments to the registry are made on a First Come First Served basis,
per <xref target="RFC8126" sectionFormat="of" section="4.4"/>.
The policy for each assignment is Specification Required,
per <xref target="RFC8126" sectionFormat="of" section="4.6"/>.
</t>
<t>
Under the NFSv4.1 specification, the name of a named
attribute can in theory be up to 2<sup>32</sup> - 1 bytes in
length, but in practice NFSv4.1 clients and servers
will be unable to handle a string that long. IANA
should reject any assignment request with a named
attribute that exceeds 128 UTF-8 characters. To give the
IESG the flexibility to set up bases of assignment of
Experimental Use and Standards Action,
the prefixes of "EXPE" and "STDS" are Reserved.
The named attribute with a zero-length name is Reserved.
</t>
<t>
The prefix "PRIV" is designated for Private Use. A
site that wants to make use of unregistered named
attributes without risk of conflicting with an
assignment in IANA's registry should use the prefix
"PRIV" in all of its named attributes.
</t>
<t>
Because some NFSv4.1 clients and servers have case-insensitive
semantics, the fifteen additional lower case and mixed case
permutations of each of "EXPE", "PRIV", and "STDS" are Reserved (e.g.,
"expe", "expE", "exPe", etc. are Reserved).
Similarly, IANA must not allow two assignments that would conflict
if both named attributes were converted to a common case.
</t>
<t>
The registry of named attributes is a list of assignments, each
containing three fields for each assignment.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
A US-ASCII string name that is the actual name of
the attribute. This name must be unique. This
string name can be 1 to 128 UTF-8 characters
long.
</li>
<li>
A reference to the specification of the named attribute.
The reference can consume up to 256 bytes (or more if IANA
permits).
</li>
<li>
The point of contact of the registrant. The point
of contact can consume up to 256 bytes (or more if IANA
permits).
</li>
</ol>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Initial Registry</name>
<t>
There is no initial registry.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Updating Registrations</name>
<t>
The registrant is always permitted to update the point of contact
field. Any other change will require Expert Review or IESG
Approval.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="notifyiana" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Device ID Notifications</name>
<t>
IANA created a registry called the "NFSv4 Device ID
Notifications Registry".
</t>
<t>
The potential exists for new notification types to be
added to the CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID operation (see <xref target="OP_CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID" format="default"/>). This can be done
via changes to the operations that register
notifications, or by adding new operations to NFSv4.
This requires a new minor version of NFSv4, and
requires a Standards Track document from the IETF.
Another way to add a notification is to specify a new
layout type (see <xref target="pnfsiana" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
Hence, all assignments to the registry are made on a Standards Action
basis per <xref target="RFC8126" section="4.6" sectionFormat="of" format="default"/>, with
Expert Review required.
</t>
<t>
The registry is a list of assignments, each containing
five fields per assignment.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The name of the notification type. This name must have the
prefix "NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_". This name must be unique.
</li>
<li>
The value of the notification. IANA will assign
this number, and the request from the registrant
will use TBD1 instead of an actual value. IANA
<bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use a whole number that can be no higher
than 2<sup>32</sup>-1, and should be the next available
value. The value assigned must be unique.
A Designated Expert must be used to
ensure that when the name of the notification
type and its value are added to the NFSv4.1
notify_deviceid_type4 enumerated data type in the
NFSv4.1 XDR description <xref target="RFC5662" format="default"/>, the result continues to
be a valid XDR description.
</li>
<li>
The Standards Track RFC(s) that describe the
notification. If the RFC(s) have not yet been
published, the registrant will use RFCTBD2, RFCTBD3, etc. instead
of an actual RFC number.
</li>
<li>
How the RFC introduces the notification. This is
indicated by a single US-ASCII value. If the
value is N, it means a minor revision to the
NFSv4 protocol. If the value is L, it means a new
pNFS layout type. Other values can be used with
IESG Approval.
</li>
<li>
The minor versions of NFSv4 that are allowed to
use the notification. While these are numeric
values, IANA will not allocate and assign them;
the author of the relevant RFCs with IESG
Approval assigns these numbers. Each time there is a
new minor version of NFSv4 approved, a Designated
Expert should review the registry to make recommended
updates as needed.
</li>
</ol>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Initial Registry</name>
<t>
The initial registry is in <xref target="devnotelist" format="default"/>. Note that the
next available value is zero.
</t>
<table anchor="devnotelist" align="center">
<name>Initial Device ID Notification Assignments</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Notification Name</th>
<th align="left">Value</th>
<th align="left">RFC</th>
<th align="left">How</th>
<th align="left">Minor Versions</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_CHANGE</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">N</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NOTIFY_DEVICEID4_DELETE</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">N</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Updating Registrations</name>
<t>
The update of a registration will require IESG
Approval on the advice of a Designated Expert.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="recalliana" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Object Recall Types</name>
<t>
IANA created a registry called the "NFSv4 Recallable Object Types Registry".
</t>
<t>
The potential exists for new object types to be added to the CB_RECALL_ANY operation (see
<xref target="OP_CB_RECALL_ANY" format="default"/>). This can be done via changes to
the operations that add recallable types, or by adding new operations
to NFSv4. This requires a new minor version of NFSv4, and requires
a Standards Track document from IETF. Another way to
add a new recallable object is to specify a new layout type (see <xref target="pnfsiana" format="default"/>).
</t>
<t>
All assignments to the registry are made on a Standards Action
basis per <xref target="RFC8126" sectionFormat="of" section="4.9"/>, with
Expert Review required.
</t>
<t>
Recallable object types are 32-bit unsigned numbers. There are no Reserved
values. Values in the range 12 through 15, inclusive, are designated for Private
Use.
</t>
<t>
The registry is a list of assignments, each containing
five fields per assignment.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The name of the recallable object type. This name must have the
prefix "RCA4_TYPE_MASK_". The name must be unique.
</li>
<li>
The value of the recallable object type. IANA
will assign this number, and the request from the
registrant will use TBD1 instead of an actual
value. IANA <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> use a whole number that can be
no higher than 2<sup>32</sup>-1, and should be the next
available value. The value must be unique. A
Designated Expert must be used to ensure that
when the name of the recallable type and its
value are added to the NFSv4 XDR description
<xref target="RFC5662" format="default"/>,
the result continues to be a valid XDR
description.
</li>
<li>
The Standards Track RFC(s) that describe the
recallable object type. If the RFC(s) have not yet been
published, the registrant will use RFCTBD2, RFCTBD3, etc. instead
of an actual RFC number.
</li>
<li>
How the RFC introduces the recallable object type. This is
indicated by a single US-ASCII value. If the
value is N, it means a minor revision to the
NFSv4 protocol. If the value is L, it means a new
pNFS layout type. Other values can be used with
IESG Approval.
</li>
<li>
The minor versions of NFSv4 that are allowed to
use the recallable object type. While these
are numeric values, IANA will not allocate and
assign them; the author of the relevant RFCs with
IESG Approval assigns these numbers. Each time
there is a new minor version of NFSv4 approved, a
Designated Expert should review the registry to
make recommended updates as needed.
</li>
</ol>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Initial Registry</name>
<t>
The initial registry is in <xref target="recalllist" format="default"/>. Note that
the next available value is five.
</t>
<table anchor="recalllist" align="center">
<name>Initial Recallable Object Type Assignments</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Recallable Object Type Name</th>
<th align="left">Value</th>
<th align="left">RFC</th>
<th align="left">How</th>
<th align="left">Minor Versions</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">RCA4_TYPE_MASK_RDATA_DLG</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">N</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RCA4_TYPE_MASK_WDATA_DLG</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">N</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RCA4_TYPE_MASK_DIR_DLG</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">N</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RCA4_TYPE_MASK_FILE_LAYOUT</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">N</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RCA4_TYPE_MASK_BLK_LAYOUT</td>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">L</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OBJ_LAYOUT_MIN</td>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">L</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RCA4_TYPE_MASK_OBJ_LAYOUT_MAX</td>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">L</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Updating Registrations</name>
<t>
The update of a registration will require IESG
Approval on the advice of a Designated Expert.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="pnfsiana" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Layout Types</name>
<t>
IANA created a registry called the "pNFS Layout Types Registry".
</t>
<t>
All assignments to the registry are made on a Standards Action basis,
with Expert Review required.
</t>
<t>
Layout types are 32-bit numbers. The value zero is Reserved.
Values in the range 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF inclusive are designated for Private Use.
IANA will assign numbers from the range
0x00000001 to 0x7FFFFFFF inclusive.
</t>
<t>
The registry is a list of assignments, each
containing five fields.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The name of the layout type. This name must have the
prefix "LAYOUT4_". The name must be unique.
</li>
<li>
The value of the layout type. IANA will assign
this number, and the request from the registrant
will use TBD1 instead of an actual value. The value
assigned must be unique.
A Designated Expert must be used to ensure
that when the name of the layout type and
its value are added to the NFSv4.1 layouttype4
enumerated data type in the NFSv4.1 XDR
description <xref target="RFC5662" format="default"/>,
the result continues to be a valid XDR
description.
</li>
<li>
The Standards Track RFC(s) that describe the
notification. If the RFC(s) have not yet been
published, the registrant will use RFCTBD2, RFCTBD3, etc. instead
of an actual RFC number. Collectively, the RFC(s) must adhere to
the guidelines listed in <xref target="layout_guidelines" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
How the RFC introduces the layout type. This is
indicated by a single US-ASCII value. If the
value is N, it means a minor revision to the
NFSv4 protocol. If the value is L, it means a new
pNFS layout type. Other values can be used with
IESG Approval.
</li>
<li>
The minor versions of NFSv4 that are allowed to
use the notification. While these are numeric
values, IANA will not allocate and assign them;
the author of the relevant RFCs with IESG
Approval assigns these numbers. Each time there is
a new minor version of NFSv4 approved, a Designated
Expert should review the registry to make recommended
updates as needed.
</li>
</ol>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Initial Registry</name>
<t>
The initial registry is in <xref target="layoutlist" format="default"/>.
</t>
<table anchor="layoutlist" align="center">
<name>Initial Layout Type Assignments</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Layout Type Name</th>
<th align="left">Value</th>
<th align="left">RFC</th>
<th align="left">How</th>
<th align="left">Minor Versions</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">LAYOUT4_NFSV4_1_FILES</td>
<td align="left">0x1</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">N</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LAYOUT4_OSD2_OBJECTS</td>
<td align="left">0x2</td>
<td align="left">RFC 5664</td>
<td align="left">L</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LAYOUT4_BLOCK_VOLUME</td>
<td align="left">0x3</td>
<td align="left">RFC 5663</td>
<td align="left">L</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Updating Registrations</name>
<t>
The update of a registration will require IESG
Approval on the advice of a Designated Expert.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="layout_guidelines" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Guidelines for Writing Layout Type Specifications</name>
<t>
The author of a new pNFS layout specification must follow these
steps to obtain acceptance of the layout type as a Standards Track RFC:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The author devises the new layout specification.
</li>
<li>
<t>
The new layout type specification <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>, at a minimum:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Define the contents of the layout-type-specific fields of the
following data types:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
the da_addr_body field of the device_addr4
data type;
</li>
<li>
the loh_body field of the layouthint4
data type;
</li>
<li>
the loc_body field of layout_content4
data type (which in turn is the lo_content field of the
layout4 data type);
</li>
<li>
the lou_body field of the layoutupdate4
data type;
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Describe or define the storage access protocol used to access
the storage devices.
</li>
<li>
Describe whether revocation of layouts is supported.
</li>
<li>
<t>
At a minimum, describe the methods of recovery from:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li> Failure and restart for client, server, storage device.
</li>
<li> Lease expiration from perspective of the active client,
server, storage device.
</li>
<li> Loss of layout state resulting in fencing of client
access to storage devices (for an example, see
<xref target="lease_expiration_mds" format="default"/>).
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<t>
Include an IANA considerations section, which will
in turn include:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
A request to IANA
for a new layout type per <xref target="pnfsiana" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
A list of requests to IANA for
any new recallable object types for
CB_RECALL_ANY; each entry is to be presented in the form described
in <xref target="recalliana" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
A list of requests to IANA for
any new notification values for
CB_NOTIFY_DEVICEID; each entry is to be presented in the form
described in <xref target="notifyiana" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
Include a security considerations section. This section <bcp14>MUST</bcp14>
explain how the NFSv4.1 authentication, authorization, and
access-control models are preserved. That is, if a metadata server
would restrict a READ or WRITE operation, how would pNFS via
the layout similarly restrict a corresponding input or
output operation?
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
The author documents the new layout specification as an Internet-Draft.
</li>
<li>
The author submits the Internet-Draft for review through the
IETF standards process as defined in "The Internet Standards
Process--Revision 3" (BCP 9).
The new layout specification will be
submitted for eventual publication as a Standards Track RFC.
</li>
<li>
The layout specification progresses through the IETF standards
process.
</li>
</ol>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="path_var_iana" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Path Variable Definitions</name>
<t>
This section deals with the IANA considerations associated with
the variable substitution feature for location names as
described in <xref target="SEC11-fsli-item" format="default"/>. As
described there, variables subject to substitution consist
of a domain name and a specific name within that domain, with the
two separated by a colon. There are two sets of IANA considerations
here:
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The list of variable names.
</li>
<li>
For each variable name, the list of possible values.
</li>
</ol>
<t>
Thus, there will be one registry for the list of variable names, and
possibly one registry for listing the values of each variable name.
</t>
<section anchor="path_variables_iana" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Path Variables Registry</name>
<t>
IANA created a registry called the "NFSv4 Path Variables Registry".
</t>
<section anchor="path_values_iana" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Path Variable Values</name>
<t>
Variable names are of the form "${", followed by a
domain name, followed by a colon (":"), followed by
a domain-specific portion of the variable name,
followed by "}". When the domain name is "ietf.org",
all variables names must be registered with IANA on
a Standards Action basis, with Expert Review
required. Path variables with registered domain
names neither part of nor equal to ietf.org are
assigned on a Hierarchical Allocation basis
(delegating to the domain owner) and thus of no
concern to IANA, unless the domain owner chooses to
register a variable name from his domain. If the
domain owner chooses to do so, IANA will do so on a
First Come First Serve basis. To accommodate
registrants who do not have their own domain, IANA
will accept requests to register variables with the
prefix "${FCFS.ietf.org:" on a First Come First
Served basis. Assignments on a First Come First Basis
do not require Expert Review, unless the registrant also
wants IANA to establish a registry for the values of the
registered variable.
</t>
<t>
The registry is a list of assignments, each
containing three fields.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
The name of the variable. The name of this
variable must start with a "${" followed by a
registered domain name, followed by ":", or it
must start with "${FCFS.ietf.org". The name must
be no more than 64 UTF-8 characters long. The
name must be unique.
</li>
<li>
For assignments made on Standards Action basis,
the Standards Track RFC(s) that describe the
variable. If the RFC(s) have not yet been
published, the registrant will use RFCTBD1,
RFCTBD2, etc. instead of an actual RFC number.
Note that the RFCs do not have to be a part of an NFS minor version.
For assignments made on a First Come First Serve basis, an explanation
(consuming no more than 1024 bytes, or more if IANA permits)
of the purpose of the variable. A reference to the explanation can
be substituted.
</li>
<li>
The point of contact, including an email address. The point of
contact can consume up to 256 bytes (or more if IANA permits).
For assignments made on a Standards Action basis, the point of
contact is always IESG.
</li>
</ol>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Initial Registry</name>
<t>
The initial registry is in <xref target="varlist" format="default"/>.
</t>
<table anchor="varlist" align="center">
<name>Initial List of Path Variables</name>
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left">Variable Name</th>
<th align="left">RFC</th>
<th align="left">Point of Contact</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">${ietf.org:CPU_ARCH}</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">IESG</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">${ietf.org:OS_TYPE}</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">IESG</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">${ietf.org:OS_VERSION}</td>
<td align="left">RFC 8881</td>
<td align="left">IESG</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<t>
IANA has created registries for the values
of the variable names ${ietf.org:CPU_ARCH} and
${ietf.org:OS_TYPE}. See Sections <xref target="cpu_arch" format="counter"/>
and <xref target="os_type" format="counter"/>.
</t>
<t>
For the values of the variable
${ietf.org:OS_VERSION}, no registry is needed as
the specifics of the values of the variable will
vary with the value of ${ietf.org:OS_TYPE}. Thus,
values for ${ietf.org:OS_VERSION} are on a
Hierarchical Allocation basis and are of no concern
to IANA.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Updating Registrations</name>
<t>
The update of an assignment made on a Standards Action basis
will require IESG Approval on the advice of a Designated Expert.
</t>
<t>
The registrant can always update the point of contact of an assignment
made on a First Come First Serve basis. Any other update will require
Expert Review.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="cpu_arch" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Values for the ${ietf.org:CPU_ARCH} Variable</name>
<t>
IANA created a registry called the "NFSv4 ${ietf.org:CPU_ARCH} Value Registry".
</t>
<t>
Assignments to the registry are made on a First Come First Serve
basis. The zero-length value of ${ietf.org:CPU_ARCH} is Reserved.
Values with a prefix of "PRIV" are designated for Private Use.
</t>
<t>
The registry is a list of assignments, each
containing three fields.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
A value of the ${ietf.org:CPU_ARCH} variable. The value
must be 1 to 32 UTF-8 characters long. The value must be unique.
</li>
<li>
An explanation (consuming no more than 1024
bytes, or more if IANA permits) of what CPU
architecture the value denotes. A reference to
the explanation can be substituted.
</li>
<li>
The point of contact, including an email address. The point of
contact can consume up to 256 bytes (or more if IANA permits).
</li>
</ol>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Initial Registry</name>
<t>
There is no initial registry.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Updating Registrations</name>
<t>
The registrant is free to update the assignment, i.e., change the
explanation and/or point-of-contact fields.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="os_type" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Values for the ${ietf.org:OS_TYPE} Variable</name>
<t>
IANA created a registry called the "NFSv4 ${ietf.org:OS_TYPE} Value Registry".
</t>
<t>
Assignments to the registry are made on a First Come First Serve
basis. The zero-length value of ${ietf.org:OS_TYPE} is Reserved.
Values with a prefix of "PRIV" are designated for Private Use.
</t>
<t>
The registry is a list of assignments, each
containing three fields.
</t>
<ol spacing="normal" type="1">
<li>
A value of the ${ietf.org:OS_TYPE} variable. The value
must be 1 to 32 UTF-8 characters long. The value must be unique.
</li>
<li>
An explanation (consuming no more than 1024
bytes, or more if IANA permits) of what CPU
architecture the value denotes. A reference to
the explanation can be substituted.
</li>
<li>
The point of contact, including an email address. The point of
contact can consume up to 256 bytes (or more if IANA permits).
</li>
</ol>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Initial Registry</name>
<t>
There is no initial registry.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Updating Registrations</name>
<t>
The registrant is free to update the assignment, i.e., change the
explanation and/or point of contact fields.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</section>
</section>
<!--[auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
</middle>
<!-- $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<back>
<!-- $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<references>
<name>References</name>
<references>
<name>Normative References</name>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4506.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5531.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2203.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4121.xml"/>
<reference anchor="hardlink" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title abbrev="Open Group">Section 3.191 of Chapter 3 of
Base Definitions of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2743.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5040.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5403.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5662.xml"/>
<reference anchor="symlink" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 3.372 of Chapter 3 of
Base Definitions of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5665.xml"/>
<reference anchor="read_atime" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 'read()' of
System Interfaces of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="readdir_atime" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 'readdir()' of
System Interfaces of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="write_atime" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 'write()' of
System Interfaces of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3454.xml"/>
<reference anchor="chmod" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 'chmod()' of
System Interfaces of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="ISO.10646-1.1993">
<front>
<title>Information Technology -
Universal Multiple-octet coded Character Set (UCS) -
Part 1: Architecture and Basic Multilingual Plane </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISO" value="Standard 10646-1"/>
<author>
<organization>International Organization for Standardization
</organization>
</author>
<date month="May" year="1993"/>
</front>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2277.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3491.xml"/>
<reference anchor="fcntl" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 'fcntl()' of
System Interfaces of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="fsync" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 'fsync()' of
System Interfaces of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="passwd" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 'getpwnam()' of
System Interfaces of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="unlink" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>Section 'unlink()' of
System Interfaces of The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6
IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition, HTML Version </title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1931624232"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
</front>
</reference>
<!-- [auth] obsoleted by RFC 5531
<reference anchor='RFC1831'>
<front>
<title abbrev='Remote Procedure Call Protocol Version 2'>RPC:
Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2</title>
<author initials='R.' surname='Srinivasan' fullname='Raj Srinivasan'>
<organization>Sun Microsystems, Inc., ONC Technologies</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>2550 Garcia Avenue</street>
<street>M/S MTV-5-40</street>
<city>Mountain View</city>
<region>CA</region>
<code>94043</code>
<country>US</country></postal>
<phone>+1 415 336 2478</phone>
<facsimile>+1 415 336 6015</facsimile>
<email>raj@eng.sun.com</email></address></author>
<date year='1995' month='August' />
<abstract>
<t>This document describes the ONC Remote Procedure Call (ONC
RPC Version 2) protocol as it is currently deployed and
accepted. "ONC" stands for "Open Network
Computing".</t></abstract></front>
<seriesInfo name='RFC' value='1831' />
<format type='TXT' octets='37798' target='ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1831.txt' />
</reference> -->
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4055.xml"/>
<reference anchor="CSOR_AES" target="http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/crypto_apps_infra/csor/algorithms.html">
<front>
<title>Cryptographic Algorithm Object Registration
</title>
<author>
<organization>National Institute of Standards and Technology
</organization>
</author>
<date month="November" year="2007"/>
</front>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7861.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4120.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.4033.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7858.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8000.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8166.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8267.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8484.xml"/>
<!-- Add this ref if we can add a reference to BCP 9 (mentioned in the IC section):
<referencegroup anchor="BCP09" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp9">
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2026.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7127.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5657.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6410.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7100.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7475.xml"/>
</referencegroup>
-->
</references>
<references>
<name>Informative References</name>
<!--draft-roach-bis-documents expired -->
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.draft-roach-bis-documents-00.xml"/>
<!-- RFC 3530 (NFSv4 version 0) is obsoleted by RFC 7530, but is
mentioned in historical context.
-->
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3530.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1813.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2847.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2623.xml"/>
<reference anchor="Chet">
<front>
<title>Improving the Performance
and Correctness of an NFS Server</title>
<author initials="C." surname="Juszczak" fullname="Chet Juszczak">
<organization>Digital Equipment Corporation</organization>
</author>
<date month="June" year="1990"/>
<abstract>
<t>
Describes reply cache implementation that
avoids work in the server by handling
duplicate requests. More important, though
listed as a side-effect, the reply cache
aids in the avoidance of destructive non-
idempotent operation re-application --
improving correctness.
</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<refcontent>USENIX Conference Proceedings</refcontent>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3232.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1833.xml"/>
<reference anchor="rpc_xid_issues">
<front>
<title>RPC XID Issues</title>
<author initials="R." surname="Werme" fullname="Ric Werme">
<organization>Digital Equipment Corporation</organization>
</author>
<date month="February" year="1996"/>
<abstract>
<t>
The presentation provides implementation advice for
ONC RPC transaction identifier (xid) generation.
</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<refcontent>USENIX Conference Proceedings</refcontent>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.1094.xml"/>
<!-- Found the following
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.33.7106&rep=rep1&type=pdf
-->
<reference anchor="ha_nfs_ibm">
<front>
<title>A Highly Available Network Server</title>
<author initials="A." surname="Bhide" fullname="Anupam Bhide">
<organization>IBM T.J. Watson Research Center</organization>
</author>
<author initials="E. N." surname="Elnozahy" fullname="Elmootazbellah N. Elnozahy">
<organization>IBM T.J. Watson Research Center</organization>
</author>
<author initials="S. P." surname="Morgan" fullname="Stephen P. Morgan ">
<organization>IBM T.J. Watson Research Center</organization>
</author>
<date month="January" year="1991"/>
<abstract>
<t>
This paper presents the design and implementation
of a Highly Available Network File Server
(HA-NFS). We separate the problem of network
file server reliability into three different subproblems:
server reliability, disk reliability, and network
reliability. HA-NFS offers a different solution
for each: dual-ported disks and impersonation
are used to provide server reliability, disk mirroring
can be used to provide disk reliability, and optional
network replication can be used to provide
network reliability. The implementation shows
that HA-NFS provides high availability without
the excessive resource overhead or the performance
degradation that characterize traditional replication
methods. Ongoing operations are not aborted
during fail-over and recovery is completely transparent
to applications. HA-NFS adheres to the
NFS protocol standard and can be used by existing
NFS clients without modification.
</t>
</abstract>
</front>
<refcontent>USENIX Conference Proceedings</refcontent>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5664.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5663.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2054.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2055.xml"/>
<reference anchor="errata" target="https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/">
<front>
<title>IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream
</title>
<author>
<organization>IESG
</organization>
</author>
<date month="July" year="2008"/>
</front>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2104.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2624.xml"/>
<reference anchor="xnfs">
<front>
<title> Protocols for Interworking: XNFS, Version 3W</title>
<seriesInfo name="ISBN" value="1-85912-184-5"/>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group </organization>
</author>
<date month="February" year="1998"/>
</front>
</reference>
<reference anchor="Floyd">
<front>
<title> The Synchronization of Periodic Routing Messages </title>
<author initials="S." surname="Floyd">
<organization/>
</author>
<author initials="V." surname="Jacobson">
<organization/>
</author>
<date month="April" year="1994"/>
</front>
<refcontent>IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2(2), pp. 122-136</refcontent>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3720.xml"/>
<reference anchor="FCP-2">
<front>
<title>Fibre Channel Protocol for SCSI, 2nd Version (FCP-2)</title>
<author initials="R." surname="Snively" fullname="Robert Snively">
<organization>Brocade Communication Systems, Inc.</organization>
</author>
<date month="Oct" year="2003"/>
</front>
<refcontent>ANSI/INCITS, 350-2003</refcontent>
</reference>
<!-- [rfced] The URL http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/osd/osd-r10.pdf
does not work. Should the URL be removed or updated?
Original:
[57] Weber, R., "Object-Based Storage Device Commands (OSD)",
ANSI/INCITS 400-2004, July 2004,
<http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/osd/osd-r10.pdf>.
-->
<reference anchor="OSD-T10" target="http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/osd/osd-r10.pdf">
<front>
<title>Object-Based Storage Device Commands (OSD)</title>
<author initials="R.O." surname="Weber" fullname="Ralph O. Weber">
<organization>ENDL Texas</organization>
</author>
<date month="July" year="2004"/>
</front>
<refcontent>ANSI/INCITS, 400-2004</refcontent>
</reference>
<reference anchor="PVFS">
<front>
<title>PVFS: A Parallel File System for Linux Clusters.</title>
<author initials="P. H." surname="Carns">
<organization> Parallel Architecture Research Laboratory,
Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 </organization>
</author>
<author initials="W. B." surname="Ligon III">
<organization> Parallel Architecture Research Laboratory,
Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 </organization>
</author>
<author initials="R. B." surname="Ross">
<organization> Parallel Architecture Research Laboratory,
Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634 </organization>
</author>
<author initials="R." surname="Thakur">
<organization>Mathematics and Computer Science Division,
Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439</organization>
</author>
<date year="2000"/>
</front>
<refcontent>Proceedings of the 4th Annual Linux Showcase and Conference</refcontent>
</reference>
<reference anchor="access_api" target="https://www.opengroup.org">
<front>
<title>The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6, IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 Edition
</title>
<author>
<organization>The Open Group
</organization>
</author>
<date year="2004"/>
<abstract>
<t>
The description of the access() function states: "If the process has appropriate privileges, an implementation may indicate success for X_OK even if none of the execute file permission bits are set."
</t>
</abstract>
</front>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2224.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2755.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8126.xml"/>
<reference anchor="Err2006" quote-title="false" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2006">
<front>
<title>Erratum ID 2006</title>
<author>
<organization>RFC Errata</organization>
</author>
</front>
<refcontent>RFC 5661</refcontent>
</reference>
<!-- [rfced] This URL appears to refer to a personal site. Is there a
stable URL to which we can refer?
Original:
[64] Spasojevic, M. and M. Satayanarayanan, "An Empirical Study
of a Wide-Area Distributed File System", May 1996,
<https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~satya/docdir/spasojevic-tocs-afs-
measurement-1996.pdf>.
-->
<reference anchor="AFS" target="https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~satya/docdir/spasojevic-tocs-afs-measurement-1996.pdf">
<front>
<title>
An Empirical Study of a Wide-Area Distributed File System
</title>
<author initials="M." surname="Spasojevic" fullname="Mirjana Spasojevic">
</author>
<author initials="M." surname="Satayanarayanan" fullname="Mahadev Satayanarayanan">
</author>
<date year="1996" month="May"/>
</front>
</reference>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.5661.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8178.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7530.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7931.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8434.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7258.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3552.xml"/>
</references>
</references>
<!-- [auth] $Id: 2009-12-20-TO-rfc5661.xml,v 1.2 2009/12/21 05:59:32 shepler.mre Exp $ -->
<section anchor="NEED" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>The Need for This Update</name>
<t>
This document includes an explanation of how clients and servers
are to determine the particular network access paths to be used to access a
file system. This includes descriptions of
how to handle changes to the specific replica to be used or to
the set of addresses to be used to access it,
and how to deal transparently with transfers of responsibility that need to be
made. This includes cases in which
there is a shift between one replica and another and those in
which different network access paths are used to access the
same replica.
</t>
<t>
As a result of the following problems in RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>, it
was necessary to provide the specific updates that are made by this
document. These updates are described in <xref target="CHG" format="default"/>.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>, while it dealt with situations in
which various forms of clustering allowed coordination
of the state assigned by cooperating servers to be used,
made no provisions for Transparent State Migration. Within NFSv4.0,
Transparent State Migration was first explained clearly in
RFC 7530 <xref target="RFC7530" format="default"/> and corrected and
clarified by RFC 7931 <xref target="RFC7931" format="default"/>. No corresponding
explanation for NFSv4.1 had been provided.
</li>
<li>
Although NFSv4.1 provided a clear definition of how
trunking detection was to be done, there was no clear specification
of how trunking discovery was to be done, despite the fact that
the specification clearly indicated that this information
could be made available via the file system location attributes.
</li>
<li>
Because the existence of multiple network access paths to the same
file system was dealt with as if there were multiple replicas, issues relating to
transitions between replicas could never be clearly distinguished
from trunking-related transitions between the addresses used to
access a particular file system instance. As a result, in situations in
which both migration and trunking configuration changes
were involved, neither of these could be clearly dealt with, and the relationship between
these two features was not seriously addressed.
</li>
<li>
Because use of two network access paths to the same file system
instance (i.e., trunking) was often treated as if two replicas were
involved, it was considered that two replicas were being used simultaneously.
As a result, the treatment of replicas being used simultaneously
in RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> was not clear, as it covered the
two distinct cases of a single file system instance being accessed by
two different network access paths and two
replicas being accessed simultaneously, with the limitations
of the latter case not being clearly laid out.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The majority of the consequences of these issues are dealt with
by presenting in <xref target="NEW11" format="default"/> a replacement
for Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11"/>
of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>. This replacement
modifies existing subsections within that section and adds new
ones as described in <xref target="CHG-11" format="default"/>. Also, some existing
sections were deleted. These changes were made in order to do the
following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Reorganize the description so that the case of two network access paths to
the same file system instance is distinguished clearly from the case of
two different replicas since, in the former case, locking state is shared and there also
can be sharing of session state.
</li>
<li>
Provide a clear statement regarding the desirability of
transparent transfer of state between replicas together with a recommendation
that either transparent transfer or a single-fs grace period be provided.
</li>
<li>
Specifically delineate how a client is to handle such transfers,
taking into account the differences from the treatment
in <xref target="RFC7931" format="default"/> made necessary by the major protocol
changes to NFSv4.1.
</li>
<li>
Discuss the relationship between transparent
state transfer and Parallel NFS (pNFS).
</li>
<li>
Clarify the fs_locations_info attribute in order to specify
which portions of the provided information apply to a specific
network access path and which apply to the replica that the path
is used to access.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In addition, other sections of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>
were updated to correct the consequences of the
incorrect assumptions underlying the treatment of multi-server namespace
issues. These are described in Appendices <xref target="CHG-ops" format="counter"/> through
<xref target="CHG-other" format="counter"/>.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
A revised introductory section regarding multi-server namespace
facilities is provided.
</li>
<li>
A more realistic treatment of server scope is provided. This treatment
reflects the more limited coordination of locking state
adopted by servers actually sharing a common server scope.
</li>
<li>
Some confusing text regarding changes in server_owner has
been clarified.
</li>
<li>
The description of some existing errors has been modified
to more clearly explain certain error situations to reflect
the existence of trunking and the possible use of fs-specific grace
periods. For details, see <xref target="CHG-errs" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
New descriptions of certain existing operations are
provided, either because the existing treatment did not
account for situations that would arise in dealing with
Transparent State Migration, or because some types of reclaim
issues were not adequately dealt with in the context of fs-specific
grace periods. For details, see <xref target="CHG-ops" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="CHG" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Changes in This Update</name>
<section anchor="CHG-11" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Revisions Made to Section 11 of RFC 5661</name>
<t>
A number of areas have been revised or extended, in many cases
replacing subsections within Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
New introductory material, including a terminology section,
replaces the material in RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>,
ranging from the start of the original Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11"/> up to and including
Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.1"/>.
The new material starts at the beginning of
<xref target="NEW11" format="default"/> and continues
through <xref target="SEC11-loc-attr" format="counter"/>.
</li>
<li>
<t>
A significant reorganization of the material in Sections
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.4"/> and
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.5"/> of RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661"/> was necessary. The reasons for the reorganization of
these sections into a single section with multiple subsections
are discussed in <xref target="SEC11-uses-reorg" format="default"/> below.
This replacement appears as <xref target="SEC11-USES" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
New material relating to the handling of the file system location
attributes is contained in Sections <xref target="SEC11-USES-mult" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="SEC11-USES-changes" format="counter"/>.
</t>
</li>
<li>
A new section describing requirements for user and group
handling within a multi-server namespace has been added as
<xref target="SEC11-users" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
A major replacement for Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>,
entitled "Effecting File System Transitions", appears as Sections
<xref target="SEC11-trans-oview" format="counter"/> through
<xref target="SEC11-trans-server" format="counter"/>.
The reasons for the reorganization of
this section into multiple sections are discussed in
<xref target="SEC11-trans-reorg" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
A replacement for Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.10"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>,
entitled "The Attribute fs_locations_info", appears as
<xref target="SEC11-li-new" format="default"/>, with
<xref target="SEC11-li-changes" format="default"/> describing the differences
between the new section and the treatment within
<xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>.
A revised treatment was necessary because the original treatment
did not make clear how the added attribute information relates
to the case of trunked paths to the same replica. These issues
were not addressed in RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> where the
concepts of a replica and a network path used to access a replica
were not clearly distinguished.
</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="SEC11-uses-reorg" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Reorganization of Sections 11.4 and 11.5 of RFC 5661</name>
<t>
Previously, issues related to the fact that multiple location
entries directed the client to the same file system instance
were dealt with in Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.5"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>.
Because of the new treatment of trunking, these issues now belong
within <xref target="SEC11-USES" format="default"/>.
</t>
<t>
In this new section, trunking is covered in
<xref target="SEC11-USES-trunk" format="default"/> together with the other uses
of file system location information described in Sections
<xref target="SEC11-USES-types" format="counter"/> through
<xref target="SEC11-USES-ref" format="counter"/>.
</t>
<t>
As a result, <xref target="SEC11-USES" format="default"/>, which replaces
Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.4"/>
of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>, is substantially
different than the section it replaces in that some original
sections have been replaced by corresponding sections as described below, while
new sections have been added:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The material in <xref target="SEC11-USES" format="default"/>,
exclusive of subsections, replaces the material
in Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.4"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/> exclusive of
subsections.
</li>
<li>
<xref target="SEC11-USES-mult" format="default"/>
is the new first subsection of the overall section.
</li>
<li>
<xref target="SEC11-USES-trunk" format="default"/>
is the new second subsection of the overall section.
</li>
<li>
Each of the Sections
<xref target="SEC11-USES-repl" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="SEC11-USES-migr" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="SEC11-USES-ref" format="counter"/>
replaces (in order) one of the corresponding Sections
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.4.1"/>,
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.4.2"/>, and
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.4.3"/> of RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661"/>.
</li>
<li>
<xref target="SEC11-USES-changes" format="default"/>
is the new final subsection of the overall section.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-trans-reorg" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Reorganization of Material Dealing with File System Transitions</name>
<t>
The material relating to file system transition, previously contained
in Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/> has
been reorganized and augmented as described below:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Because there can be a shift of the network access paths used to
access a file system instance without any shift between replicas,
a new <xref target="SEC11-trans-oview" format="default"/> distinguishes
between those cases in which there is a shift between
distinct replicas and those involving a shift in network
access paths with no shift between replicas.
</t>
<t>
As a result, the new <xref target="SEC11-nwa" format="default"/> deals with network
address transitions, while the bulk of the original Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7"/> of RFC
5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/> has been extensively modified as reflected in
<xref target="SEC11-EFF" format="default"/>, which is now limited to cases
in which there is a shift between two different sets of replicas.
</t>
</li>
<li>
The additional <xref target="SEC11-trans-locking" format="default"/> discusses the
case in which a shift to a different replica is made and state
is transferred to allow the client the ability to have continued
access to its accumulated locking state on the new server.
</li>
<li>
The additional <xref target="SEC11-trans-client" format="default"/> discusses
the client's response to access transitions, how it determines
whether migration has occurred, and how it gets access to any
transferred locking and session state.
</li>
<li>
The additional <xref target="SEC11-trans-server" format="default"/> discusses the
responsibilities of the source and destination servers when
transferring locking and session state.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
This reorganization has caused a renumbering of the sections
within <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="of" section="11"/> as described below:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The new Sections <xref target="SEC11-trans-oview" format="counter"/>
and <xref target="SEC11-nwa" format="counter"/> have resulted
in the renumbering of existing sections with these numbers.
</li>
<li>
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="of" section="11.7"/> has been substantially
modified and appears as <xref target="SEC11-EFF" format="default"/>. The necessary
modifications reflect the fact that this section only deals
with transitions between replicas, while transitions between
network addresses are dealt with in other sections. Details
of the reorganization are described later in this section.
</li>
<li>
Sections
<xref target="SEC11-trans-locking" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="SEC11-trans-client" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="SEC11-trans-server" format="counter"/> have been
added.
</li>
<li>
Consequently, Sections <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.8"/>,
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.9"/>,
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.10"/>, and
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.11"/> in
<xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> now appear
as Sections <xref target="effecting_referrals" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="fs_locations" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="SEC11-li-new" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="fs_status" format="counter"/>,
respectively.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
As part of this general reorganization,
Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>
has been modified as described below:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Sections <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7"/> and
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.1"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>
have been replaced by Sections
<xref target="SEC11-EFF" format="counter"/> and
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-simul" format="counter"/>, respectively.
</li>
<li>
Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.2"/>
of RFC 5661 (and included subsections) has been deleted.
</li>
<li>
Sections <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.3"/>,
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.4"/>,
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.5"/>,
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.5.1"/>, and
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.6"/> of RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> have been replaced by Sections
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-fh" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-fileid" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-fsid" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-fsid-split" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-change" format="counter"/>
respectively in this document.
</li>
<li>
Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.7"/>
of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/> has been replaced by
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-lock" format="default"/>. This subsection has been
moved to the end of the section dealing with file system transitions.
</li>
<li>
Sections <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.8"/>,
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.9"/>, and
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.7.10"/> of RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> have been replaced by Sections
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-wv" format="counter"/>,
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-rdc" format="counter"/>, and
<xref target="SEC11-EFF-data" format="counter"/>
respectively in this document.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="SEC11-li-changes" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Updates to the Treatment of fs_locations_info</name>
<t>
Various elements of the fs_locations_info attribute contain
information that applies to either a specific file system replica
or to a network path or set of network paths used to access such a replica.
The original treatment of fs_locations_info (Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11.10"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>)
did not clearly distinguish these cases, in
part because the document did not clearly distinguish replicas from
the paths used to access them.
</t>
<t>
In addition, special clarification has been provided with regard
to the following fields:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
With regard to the handling of FSLI4GF_GOING, it was
clarified that this only applies to the unavailability of a
replica rather than to a path to access a replica.
</li>
<li>
In describing the appropriate value for a server to use for
fli_valid_for, it was clarified that there is no
need for the client to frequently fetch the fs_locations_info
value to be prepared for shifts in trunking patterns.
</li>
<li>
Clarification of the rules for extensions to the fls_info has
been provided. The original treatment reflected the extension
model that was in effect at the time RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>
was written, but has been updated in accordance with the extension model
described in RFC 8178 <xref target="RFC8178" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="CHG-ops" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Revisions Made to Operations in RFC 5661</name>
<t>
Descriptions have been revised to address issues that arose in
effecting necessary changes to multi-server namespace features.
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The treatment of EXCHANGE_ID (Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="18.35"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>) assumed that client IDs
cannot be created/confirmed other than by the EXCHANGE_ID and CREATE_SESSION
operations. Also, the necessary use of EXCHANGE_ID in recovery
from migration and related situations was not clearly addressed.
A revised treatment of EXCHANGE_ID was necessary, and it appears in
<xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>, while the specific differences
between it and the treatment within <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>
are explained in <xref target="OTH-eid" format="default"/> below.
</li>
<li>
The treatment of RECLAIM_COMPLETE in Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="18.51"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/> was not sufficiently clear about the
purpose and use of the rca_one_fs and how the server was to deal
with inappropriate values of this argument. Because the
resulting confusion raised interoperability issues, a new treatment
of RECLAIM_COMPLETE was necessary, and it appears in
<xref target="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE" format="default"/>, while the specific differences
between it and the treatment within RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>
are discussed in <xref target="OTH-rc" format="default"/> below. In addition, the
definitions of the reclaim-related errors have received an updated
treatment in <xref target="errors_reclaim" format="default"/> to reflect the fact
that there are multiple contexts for lock reclaim operations.
</li>
</ul>
<section anchor="OTH-eid" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Revision of Treatment of EXCHANGE_ID</name>
<t>
There was a number of issues in the original treatment of
EXCHANGE_ID in RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> that caused problems
for Transparent State Migration and for the transfer of access
between different network access paths to the same file system instance.
</t>
<t>
These issues arose from the fact that this treatment was written:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
Assuming that a client ID can only become known to a server
by having been created by executing an EXCHANGE_ID, with
confirmation of the ID only possible by execution of a
CREATE_SESSION.
</li>
<li>
Considering the interactions between a client and a server only
occurring on a single network address.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
As these assumptions have become invalid in the context of
Transparent State Migration and active use of trunking,
the treatment has been modified in several respects:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
It had been assumed that an EXCHANGE_ID executed when the server
was already aware that a given client instance was either updating
associated parameters (e.g., with respect to callbacks) or dealing
with a previously lost reply by retransmitting. As a
result, any slot sequence returned by that operation
would be of no use. The original treatment
went so far as to say that it "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>" be used, although
this usage was not in accord with <xref target="RFC2119" format="default"/>.
This created a difficulty when an EXCHANGE_ID is done after Transparent State
Migration since that slot sequence would need to be used in a
subsequent CREATE_SESSION.
</t>
<t>
In the updated treatment, CREATE_SESSION is a way that client
IDs are confirmed, but it is understood that other ways are
possible. The slot sequence can be used as needed, and cases
in which it would be of no use are appropriately noted.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
It had been assumed that the only functions of EXCHANGE_ID were to
inform the server of the client, to create the client ID,
and to communicate it to the client. When multiple
simultaneous connections are involved, as often happens when
trunking, that treatment was inadequate in that it ignored the
role of EXCHANGE_ID in associating the client ID with the
connection on which it was done, so that it could be used
by a subsequent CREATE_SESSSION whose parameters do not
include an explicit client ID.
</t>
<t>
The new treatment explicitly discusses the role of EXCHANGE_ID
in associating the client ID with the connection so it
can be used by CREATE_SESSION and in associating a connection with an
existing session.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The new treatment can be found in <xref target="OP_EXCHANGE_ID" format="default"/>
above. It supersedes the treatment in Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="18.35"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="OTH-rc" toc="exclude" numbered="true">
<name>Revision of Treatment of RECLAIM_COMPLETE</name>
<t>
The following changes were made to the treatment of
RECLAIM_COMPLETE in RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/> to arrive at the
treatment in <xref target="OP_RECLAIM_COMPLETE" format="default"/>:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
In a number of places, the text was made more explicit about the
purpose of rca_one_fs and its connection to file system
migration.
</li>
<li>
There is a discussion of situations in which particular forms of
RECLAIM_COMPLETE would need to be done.
</li>
<li>
There is a discussion of interoperability issues between
implementations that may have arisen due to the lack of
clarity of the previous treatment of RECLAIM_COMPLETE.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="CHG-errs" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Revisions Made to Error Definitions in RFC 5661</name>
<t>
The new handling of various situations required revisions to
some existing error definitions:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
Because of the need to appropriately address trunking-related
issues, some uses of the term "replica" in RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>
became problematic because a shift in network access paths was
considered to be a shift to a different replica. As a result,
the original definition of NFS4ERR_MOVED (in Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="15.1.2.4"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>) was updated to reflect the
different handling of unavailability of a particular fs via a
specific network address.
</t>
<t>
Since such a situation is no longer
considered to constitute unavailability of a file system
instance, the description has been changed, even though the set of circumstances in
which it is to be returned remains the same.
The new paragraph explicitly recognizes that a different network
address might be used, while the previous description, misleadingly,
treated this as a shift between two replicas while only a single
file system instance might be involved. The updated description
appears in <xref target="err_MOVED" format="default"/>.
</t>
</li>
<li>
Because of the need to accommodate the use of fs-specific grace periods,
it was necessary to clarify some of the definitions of
reclaim-related errors in Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="15"/> of RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661"/>
so that the text applies properly to reclaims for all types of grace
periods. The updated descriptions
appear within <xref target="errors_reclaim" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
Because of the need to provide the clarifications in errata
report 2006 <xref target="Err2006" format="default"/>
and to adapt these to properly explain the interaction of
NFS4ERR_DELAY with the reply cache, a revised description
of NFS4ERR_DELAY appears in <xref target="err_DELAY" format="default"/>. This
errata report, unlike many other RFC 5661 errata reports, is
addressed in this
document because of the extensive use of NFS4ERR_DELAY
in connection with state migration and session migration.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
<section anchor="CHG-other" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Other Revisions Made to RFC 5661</name>
<t>
Besides the major reworking of Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="11"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/> and the associated revisions to
existing operations and errors, there were a number of related changes that were necessary:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The summary in Section <xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="1.7.3.3"/>
of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/> was revised to reflect the changes made to
<xref target="NEW11" format="default"/> above. The updated summary appears as
<xref target="PREP-intro" format="default"/> above.
</li>
<li>
The discussion of server scope in Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="2.10.4"/> of RFC 5661
<xref target="RFC5661"/> was replaced since it
appeared to require a level of inter-server coordination
incompatible with its basic function of avoiding the need for
a globally uniform means of assigning server_owner values.
A revised treatment appears in <xref target="Server_Scope" format="default"/>.
</li>
<li>
The discussion of trunking in Section
<xref target="RFC5661" sectionFormat="bare" section="2.10.5"/> of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661"/>
was revised to more clearly
explain the multiple types of trunking support and how the
client can be made aware of the existing trunking configuration.
In addition, while the last paragraph (exclusive of subsections) of
that section dealing with server_owner changes was literally true,
it had been a source of confusion. Since the original paragraph could be read as
suggesting that such changes be handled nondisruptively, the
issue was clarified in the revised <xref target="Trunking" format="default"/>.
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="SECBAD" numbered="true" toc="default">
<name>Security Issues That Need to Be Addressed</name>
<t>
The following issues in the treatment of security within the NFSv4.1
specification need to be addressed:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The Security Considerations Section of RFC 5661 <xref target="RFC5661" format="default"/>
was not written in accordance with RFC 3552 (BCP 72) <xref target="RFC3552" format="default"/>.
Of particular concern was the fact that the section
did not contain a threat analysis.
</li>
<li>
Initial analysis of the existing security issues with NFSv4.1 has made
it likely that a revised Security Considerations section for the
existing protocol (one containing a threat analysis) would be likely
to conclude that NFSv4.1 does not meet the goal of secure use on the
Internet.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
The Security Considerations section of
this document (<xref target="SECCON" format="default"/>) has not been thoroughly
revised to correct the difficulties mentioned above. Instead, it has been
modified to take proper account of issues related to the multi-server
namespace features discussed in <xref target="NEW11" format="default"/>, leaving the
incomplete discussion and security weaknesses pretty much as they were.
</t>
<t>
The following major security issues need to be addressed in a
satisfactory fashion before an updated Security Considerations section
can be published as part of a bis document for NFSv4.1:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
<t>
The continued use of AUTH_SYS and the security exposures it creates
need to be addressed. Addressing this issue must not be limited to
the questions of whether the designation of this as <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> was
justified and whether it should be changed.
</t>
<t>
In any event, it may not be possible at this point to correct the
security problems created by continued use of AUTH_SYS simply by
revising this designation.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
The lack of attention within the protocol to the possibility of
pervasive monitoring attacks such as those described in RFC 7258
<xref target="RFC7258" format="default"/> (also BCP 188).
</t>
<t>
In that connection, the use of CREATE_SESSION without privacy protection needs to be addressed
as it exposes the session ID to view by an attacker. This is worrisome as this is precisely the type
of protocol artifact alluded to in RFC 7258,
which can enable further mischief on the part of
the attacker as it enables denial-of-service attacks that can be
executed effectively with only a single, normally low-value,
credential, even when RPCSEC_GSS authentication is in use.
</t>
</li>
<li>
<t>
The lack of effective use of privacy and integrity, even where the
infrastructure to support use of RPCSEC_GSS is present,
needs to be addressed.
</t>
<t>
In light of the security exposures that
this situation creates, it is not enough to define a protocol that
could address this problem with the provision of sufficient resources.
Instead, what is needed is a way to provide the necessary security
with very limited performance costs and without requiring
security infrastructure, which experience has shown is difficult for
many clients and servers to provide.
</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
In trying to provide a major security upgrade for a deployed protocol
such as NFSv4.1, the working group and the Internet community are likely
to find themselves dealing with a number of considerations such as the
following:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li>
The need to accommodate existing deployments of protocols
specified previously in existing Proposed Standards.
</li>
<li>
The difficulty of effecting changes to existing, interoperating
implementations.
</li>
<li>
The difficulty of making changes to NFSv4 protocols other than those in
the form of <bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14> extensions.
</li>
<li>
The tendency of those responsible for existing NFSv4 deployments to
ignore security flaws in the context of local area networks under
the mistaken impression that network isolation provides, in and of itself, isolation from
all potential attackers.
</li>
</ul>
<t>
Given that the above-mentioned difficulties apply to minor
version zero as well, it may make sense to deal with these security issues
in a common document that applies to all NFSv4 minor versions. If
that approach is taken, the Security Considerations section of an eventual NFv4.1 bis
document would reference that common document, and the defining
RFCs for other minor versions might do so as well.
</t>
</section>
<section numbered="false" toc="default">
<name>Acknowledgments</name>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="false">
<name>Acknowledgments for This Update</name>
<t>
The authors wish to acknowledge the important role
of <contact fullname="Andy Adamson"/> of Netapp
in clarifying the need for trunking discovery functionality, and
exploring the role of the file system location attributes in
providing the
necessary support.
</t>
<t>
The authors wish to thank <contact fullname="Tom Haynes"/> of Hammerspace for drawing our
attention to the fact that internationalization and security might
best be handled in documents dealing with such protocol issues as they
apply to all NFSv4 minor versions.
</t>
<t>
The authors also wish to acknowledge the work of <contact fullname="Xuan Qi"/> of Oracle
with NFSv4.1 client and server prototypes of Transparent State
Migration functionality.
</t>
<t>
The authors wish to thank others that brought attention to important
issues. The comments of <contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/> of Primary Data related
to trunking helped to clarify the role of DNS in
trunking discovery. <contact fullname="Rick Macklem"/>'s comments brought attention to
problems in the handling of the per-fs version of
RECLAIM_COMPLETE.
</t>
<t>
The authors wish to thank <contact fullname="Olga Kornievskaia"/> of Netapp for her helpful
review comments.
</t>
</section>
<section toc="exclude" numbered="false">
<name>Acknowledgments for RFC 5661</name>
<t>
The initial text for the SECINFO extensions were edited by
<contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/> with contributions from <contact fullname="Peng Dai"/>, <contact fullname="Sergey Klyushin"/>, and
<contact fullname="Carl Burnett"/>.
</t>
<t>
The initial text for the SESSIONS extensions were edited by
<contact fullname="Tom Talpey"/>, <contact fullname="Spencer Shepler"/>,
<contact fullname="Jon Bauman"/> with contributions from
<contact fullname="Charles Antonelli"/>, <contact fullname="Brent Callaghan"/>, <contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/>, <contact fullname="John Howard"/>, <contact fullname="Chet Juszczak"/>, <contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/>, <contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>, <contact fullname="John Scott"/>, <contact fullname="Mike Stolarchuk"/>, and <contact fullname="Mark Wittle"/>.
</t>
<t>
Initial text relating to multi-server namespace features,
including the concept of referrals, were contributed by
<contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>, <contact fullname="Carl Burnett"/>,
and <contact fullname="Charles Fan"/> with contributions
from <contact fullname="Ted Anderson"/>, <contact fullname="Neil Brown"/>, and <contact fullname="Jon Haswell"/>.
</t>
<t>
The initial text for the Directory Delegations support were
contributed by <contact fullname="Saadia Khan"/> with input from
<contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>, <contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/>,
<contact fullname="Carl Burnett"/>, <contact fullname="Ted Anderson"/>,
and <contact fullname="Tom Talpey"/>.
</t>
<t>
The initial text for the ACL explanations were contributed by
<contact fullname="Sam Falkner"/> and <contact fullname="Lisa Week"/>.
</t>
<t>
The pNFS work was inspired by the NASD and OSD
work done by <contact fullname="Garth Gibson"/>. <contact fullname="Gary Grider"/> has also
been a champion of high-performance parallel I/O.
<contact fullname="Garth Gibson"/> and <contact fullname="Peter Corbett"/> started the pNFS
effort with a problem statement document for the IETF
that formed the basis for the pNFS work in NFSv4.1.
</t>
<t>
The initial text for the parallel NFS support was edited by
<contact fullname="Brent Welch"/> and <contact fullname="Garth Goodson"/>. Additional authors for those
documents were <contact fullname="Benny Halevy"/>, <contact fullname="David Black"/>, and <contact fullname="Andy Adamson"/>.
Additional input came from the informal group that contributed
to the construction of the initial pNFS drafts; specific
acknowledgment goes to <contact fullname="Gary Grider"/>, <contact fullname="Peter Corbett"/>, <contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>,
<contact fullname="Peter Honeyman"/>, and <contact fullname="Stephen Fridella"/>.
</t>
<t>
<contact fullname="Fredric Isaman"/> found several errors in draft versions of the
ONC RPC XDR description of the NFSv4.1 protocol.
</t>
<t>
<contact fullname="Audrey Van Belleghem"/> provided, in numerous ways, essential
coordination and management of the process of editing the
specification documents.
</t>
<t>
<contact fullname="Richard Jernigan"/> gave feedback on the file layout's striping
pattern design.
</t>
<t>
Several formal inspection teams were formed to review various
areas of the protocol. All the inspections found significant
errors and room for improvement. NFSv4.1's inspection teams
were:
</t>
<ul spacing="normal">
<li><t>
ACLs, with the following inspectors:
<contact fullname="Sam Falkner"/>,
<contact fullname="Bruce Fields"/>,
<contact fullname="Rahul Iyer"/>,
<contact fullname="Saadia Khan"/>,
<contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>,
<contact fullname="Lisa Week"/>,
<contact fullname="Mario Wurzl"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Alan Yoder"/>.</t>
</li>
<li><t>
Sessions, with the following inspectors:
<contact fullname="William Brown"/>,
<contact fullname="Tom Doeppner"/>,
<contact fullname="Robert Gordon"/>,
<contact fullname="Benny Halevy"/>,
<contact fullname="Fredric Isaman"/>,
<contact fullname="Rick Macklem"/>,
<contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/>,
<contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>,
<contact fullname="Karen Rochford"/>,
<contact fullname="John Scott"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Peter Shah"/>.</t>
</li>
<li><t>
Initial pNFS inspection, with the following inspectors:
<contact fullname="Andy Adamson"/>,
<contact fullname="David Black"/>,
<contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/>,
<contact fullname="Marc Eshel"/>,
<contact fullname="Sam Falkner"/>,
<contact fullname="Garth Goodson"/>,
<contact fullname="Benny Halevy"/>,
<contact fullname="Rahul Iyer"/>,
<contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/>,
<contact fullname="Spencer Shepler"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Lisa Week"/>.</t>
</li>
<li><t>
Global namespace, with the following inspectors:
<contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/>,
<contact fullname="Dan Ellard"/>,
<contact fullname="Craig Everhart"/>,
<contact fullname="Fredric Isaman"/>,
<contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/>,
<contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>,
<contact fullname="Theresa Raj"/>,
<contact fullname="Spencer Shepler"/>,
<contact fullname="Renu Tewari"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Robert Thurlow"/>.</t>
</li>
<li><t>
NFSv4.1 file layout type, with the following inspectors:
<contact fullname="Andy Adamson"/>,
<contact fullname="Marc Eshel"/>,
<contact fullname="Sam Falkner"/>,
<contact fullname="Garth Goodson"/>,
<contact fullname="Rahul Iyer"/>,
<contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Lisa Week"/>.</t>
</li>
<li><t>
NFSv4.1 locking and directory delegations, with the following inspectors:
<contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/>,
<contact fullname="Pranoop Erasani"/>,
<contact fullname="Robert Gordon"/>,
<contact fullname="Saadia Khan"/>,
<contact fullname="Eric Kustarz"/>,
<contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>,
<contact fullname="Spencer Shepler"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Amy Weaver"/>.</t>
</li>
<li><t>
EXCHANGE_ID and DESTROY_CLIENTID, with the following inspectors:
<contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/>,
<contact fullname="Pranoop Erasani"/>,
<contact fullname="Robert Gordon"/>,
<contact fullname="Benny Halevy"/>,
<contact fullname="Fredric Isaman"/>,
<contact fullname="Saadia Khan"/>,
<contact fullname="Ricardo Labiaga"/>,
<contact fullname="Rick Macklem"/>,
<contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/>,
<contact fullname="Spencer Shepler"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Brent Welch"/>.</t>
</li>
<li><t>
Final pNFS inspection, with the following inspectors:
<contact fullname="Andy Adamson"/>,
<contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/>,
<contact fullname="Mark Eshel"/>,
<contact fullname="Sam Falkner"/>,
<contact fullname="Jason Glasgow"/>,
<contact fullname="Garth Goodson"/>,
<contact fullname="Robert Gordon"/>,
<contact fullname="Benny Halevy"/>,
<contact fullname="Dean Hildebrand"/>,
<contact fullname="Rahul Iyer"/>,
<contact fullname="Suchit Kaura"/>,
<contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/>,
<contact fullname="Anatoly Pinchuk"/>,
<contact fullname="Spencer Shepler"/>,
<contact fullname="Renu Tewari"/>,
<contact fullname="Lisa Week"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Brent Welch"/>.</t>
</li>
</ul>
<t>
A review team worked together to generate the tables of assignments of
error sets to operations and make sure that each such assignment had
two or more people validating it. Participating in the process were
<contact fullname="Andy Adamson"/>,
<contact fullname="Mike Eisler"/>,
<contact fullname="Sam Falkner"/>,
<contact fullname="Garth Goodson"/>,
<contact fullname="Robert Gordon"/>,
<contact fullname="Trond Myklebust"/>,
<contact fullname="Dave Noveck"/>,
<contact fullname="Spencer Shepler"/>,
<contact fullname="Tom Talpey"/>,
<contact fullname="Amy Weaver"/>,
and
<contact fullname="Lisa Week"/>.
</t>
<t>
<contact fullname="Jari Arkko"/>, <contact fullname="David Black"/>,
<contact fullname="Scott Bradner"/>, <contact fullname="Lisa Dusseault"/>, <contact fullname="Lars Eggert"/>, <contact fullname="Chris Newman"/>, and <contact fullname="Tim Polk"/> provided valuable review and guidance.
</t>
<t>
<contact fullname="Olga Kornievskaia"/> found several errors in the SSV specification.
</t>
<t>
<contact fullname="Ricardo Labiaga"/> found several places where the use of RPCSEC_GSS
was underspecified.
</t>
<t>
Those who provided miscellaneous comments include:
<contact fullname="Andy Adamson"/>, <contact fullname="Sunil Bhargo"/>,
<contact fullname="Alex Burlyga"/>, <contact fullname="Pranoop Erasani"/>,
<contact fullname="Bruce Fields"/>, <contact fullname="Vadim Finkelstein"/>, <contact fullname="Jason Goldschmidt"/>, <contact fullname="Vijay K. Gurbani"/>, <contact fullname="Sergey Klyushin"/>, <contact fullname="Ricardo Labiaga"/>, <contact fullname="James Lentini"/>, <contact fullname="Anshul Madan"/>, <contact fullname="Daniel Muntz"/>, <contact fullname="Daniel Picken"/>, <contact fullname="Archana Ramani"/>, <contact fullname="Jim Rees"/>, <contact fullname="Mahesh Siddheshwar"/>, <contact fullname="Tom Talpey"/>, and <contact fullname="Peter Varga"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
</back>
</rfc>
 End of changes. 1 change blocks. 
lines changed or deleted lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.45. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/