rfc9104v2.txt		rfc9104.txt
	Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Tantsura		Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Tantsura
	Request for Comments: 9104 Microsoft		Request for Comments: 9104 Microsoft
	Category: Standards Track Z. Wang		Category: Standards Track Z. Wang
	ISSN: 2070-1721 Q. Wu		ISSN: 2070-1721 Q. Wu
	Huawei		Huawei
	K. Talaulikar		K. Talaulikar
	Cisco Systems		Cisco Systems
	July 2021		August 2021
	Distribution of Traffic Engineering Extended Administrative Groups		Distribution of Traffic Engineering Extended Administrative Groups
	Using the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS)		Using the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS)
	Abstract		Abstract
	Administrative groups are link attributes used for traffic		Administrative groups are link attributes used for traffic
	engineering. This document defines an extension to the Border		engineering. This document defines an extension to the Border
	Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) for advertisement of extended		Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) for advertisement of extended
	administrative groups (EAGs).		administrative groups (EAGs).
	skipping to change at line 153 ¶		skipping to change at line 153 ¶
	Table 1		Table 1
	4. Manageability Considerations		4. Manageability Considerations
	The new protocol extensions introduced in this document augment the		The new protocol extensions introduced in this document augment the
	existing IGP topology information that is distributed via [RFC7752].		existing IGP topology information that is distributed via [RFC7752].
	Procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do not		Procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do not
	affect the BGP protocol operations and management other than as		affect the BGP protocol operations and management other than as
	discussed in Section 6 ("Manageability Considerations") of [RFC7752].		discussed in Section 6 ("Manageability Considerations") of [RFC7752].
	Specifically, the malformed attribute tests for syntactic checks in		Specifically, the tests for malformed attributes, to perform
	Section 6.2.2 ("Fault Management") of [RFC7752] now encompass the new		syntactic checks as described in Section 6.2.2 ("Fault Management")
	BGP-LS Attribute TLV defined in this document. The semantic or		of [RFC7752], now encompass the new BGP-LS Attribute TLV defined in
	content checking for the TLV specified in this document and its		this document. The semantic or content checking for the TLV
	association with the BGP-LS Network Layer Reachability Information		specified in this document and its association with the BGP-LS
	(NLRI) types or its BGP-LS Attribute are left to the consumer of the		Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) types or its BGP-LS
	BGP-LS information (e.g., an application or a controller) and not to		Attribute are left to the consumer of the BGP-LS information (e.g.,
	BGP itself.		an application or a controller) and not to BGP itself.
	A consumer of the BGP-LS information retrieves this information over		A consumer of the BGP-LS information retrieves this information over
	a BGP-LS session (refer to Sections 1 and 2 of [RFC7752]).		a BGP-LS session (refer to Sections 1 and 2 of [RFC7752]).
	5. Security Considerations		5. Security Considerations
	The procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do		The procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do
	not affect the BGP security model. See the "Security Considerations"		not affect the BGP security model. See the "Security Considerations"
	section of [RFC4271] for a discussion of BGP security. This document		section of [RFC4271] for a discussion of BGP security. This document
	only introduces a new Attribute TLV, and any syntactic error in it		only introduces a new Attribute TLV, and any syntactic error in it
End of changes. 2 change blocks.
	9 lines changed or deleted		9 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/