| rfc9137v2.txt | rfc9137.txt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Duke | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Duke | |||
| Request for Comments: 9137 F5 Networks, Inc. | Request for Comments: 9137 F5 Networks, Inc. | |||
| BCP: 226 September 2021 | BCP: 226 October 2021 | |||
| Category: Best Current Practice | Category: Best Current Practice | |||
| ISSN: 2070-1721 | ISSN: 2070-1721 | |||
| Considerations for Cancellation of IETF Meetings | Considerations for Cancellation of IETF Meetings | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| The IETF ordinarily holds three in-person meetings per year to | The IETF ordinarily holds three in-person meetings per year to | |||
| discuss issues and advance the Internet. However, various events can | discuss issues and advance the Internet. However, various events can | |||
| make a planned in-person meeting infeasible. This document provides | make a planned in-person meeting infeasible. This document provides | |||
| skipping to change at line 55 ¶ | skipping to change at line 55 ¶ | |||
| include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | |||
| the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | |||
| described in the Simplified BSD License. | described in the Simplified BSD License. | |||
| Table of Contents | Table of Contents | |||
| 1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
| 2. Conventions | 2. Conventions | |||
| 3. Decision Criteria and Roles | 3. Decision Criteria and Roles | |||
| 3.1. IETF LLC | 3.1. IETF LLC | |||
| 3.2. IESG and IRTF Chair | 3.2. The IESG and the Chair of the IRTF | |||
| 4. Remedies | 4. Remedies | |||
| 4.1. Relocation | 4.1. Relocation | |||
| 4.2. Virtualization | 4.2. Virtualization | |||
| 4.3. Postponement | 4.3. Postponement | |||
| 4.4. Cancellation | 4.4. Cancellation | |||
| 5. Refunds | 5. Refunds | |||
| 6. Security Considerations | 6. Security Considerations | |||
| 7. IANA Considerations | 7. IANA Considerations | |||
| 8. Normative References | 8. Normative References | |||
| Acknowledgments | Acknowledgments | |||
| skipping to change at line 119 ¶ | skipping to change at line 119 ¶ | |||
| In this document, the term "venue" refers to both the facility that | In this document, the term "venue" refers to both the facility that | |||
| houses the sessions and the official meeting hotel(s), as defined in | houses the sessions and the official meeting hotel(s), as defined in | |||
| [RFC8718]. | [RFC8718]. | |||
| 3. Decision Criteria and Roles | 3. Decision Criteria and Roles | |||
| The IETF LLC assesses whether an in-person meeting is logistically | The IETF LLC assesses whether an in-person meeting is logistically | |||
| and financially viable in light of events and assembles information | and financially viable in light of events and assembles information | |||
| about various travel restrictions that might impact attendance. The | about various travel restrictions that might impact attendance. The | |||
| IESG and the IRTF Chair assess if the projected attendance is | IESG and the Chair of the IRTF assess if the projected attendance is | |||
| sufficient for a viable in-person meeting. | sufficient for a viable in-person meeting. | |||
| 3.1. IETF LLC | 3.1. IETF LLC | |||
| The IETF LLC is responsible for assessing the suitability of a venue | The IETF LLC is responsible for assessing the suitability of a venue | |||
| for an IETF meeting and is responsible for any reassessment in | for an IETF meeting and is responsible for any reassessment in | |||
| response to a major event that leaves the prior conclusion in doubt. | response to a major event that leaves the prior conclusion in doubt. | |||
| If such an event occurs more than fourteen weeks before the start of | If such an event occurs more than fourteen weeks before the start of | |||
| the scheduled meeting, it is deemed a non-emergency situation. Later | the scheduled meeting, it is deemed a non-emergency situation. Later | |||
| events, up to and including the week of a meeting itself, are deemed | events, up to and including the week of a meeting itself, are deemed | |||
| skipping to change at line 146 ¶ | skipping to change at line 146 ¶ | |||
| SHOULD conduct a formal reassessment process that includes: | SHOULD conduct a formal reassessment process that includes: | |||
| * Consulting with the community on the timetable of the decision | * Consulting with the community on the timetable of the decision | |||
| process. | process. | |||
| * Consulting with the community on criteria to assess the impact of | * Consulting with the community on criteria to assess the impact of | |||
| new developments. | new developments. | |||
| * Publishing an assessment report and recommended remedy. | * Publishing an assessment report and recommended remedy. | |||
| * Seeking approval of the IESG and the IRTF Chair for the | * Seeking approval of the IESG and the Chair of the IRTF for the | |||
| recommendation. | recommendation. | |||
| In emergency situations, which lack the time for a consultation | In emergency situations, which lack the time for a consultation | |||
| process, this document provides criteria that have IETF consensus and | process, this document provides criteria that have IETF consensus and | |||
| that the IETF LLC MUST apply in its assessment. | that the IETF LLC MUST apply in its assessment. | |||
| The IETF LLC will collect information about the likely impact to in- | The IETF LLC will collect information about the likely impact to in- | |||
| person attendance of national travel advisories, national and | person attendance of national travel advisories, national and | |||
| corporate travel bans, availability of transportation, quarantine | corporate travel bans, availability of transportation, quarantine | |||
| requirements, etc., and report the results to the IESG and the IRTF | requirements, etc., and report the results to the IESG and the Chair | |||
| Chair. | of the IRTF. | |||
| These criteria, some of which are derived from Section 3 of | These criteria, some of which are derived from Section 3 of | |||
| [RFC8718], apply to venues that are re-evaluated due to an emergency: | [RFC8718], apply to venues that are re-evaluated due to an emergency: | |||
| * Local safety guidelines allow the venue and hotels to host a | * Local safety guidelines allow the venue and hotels to host a | |||
| meeting with the expected number of participants and staff. | meeting with the expected number of participants and staff. | |||
| * It is possible to provision Internet access to the venue that | * It is possible to provision Internet access to the venue that | |||
| allows those attending in person to utilize the Internet for all | allows those attending in person to utilize the Internet for all | |||
| their IETF, business, and day-to-day needs; in addition, there | their IETF, business, and day-to-day needs; in addition, there | |||
| skipping to change at line 199 ¶ | skipping to change at line 199 ¶ | |||
| * The financial impact of continuing a meeting or implementing any | * The financial impact of continuing a meeting or implementing any | |||
| of the possible remedies. | of the possible remedies. | |||
| The IETF LLC SHOULD cancel an in-person meeting and explore potential | The IETF LLC SHOULD cancel an in-person meeting and explore potential | |||
| remedies if it judges a meeting to be logistically impossible or | remedies if it judges a meeting to be logistically impossible or | |||
| inconsistent with its fiduciary responsibilities. | inconsistent with its fiduciary responsibilities. | |||
| In the event of considerations this document does not foresee, the | In the event of considerations this document does not foresee, the | |||
| IETF LLC should protect the health and safety of attendees and staff, | IETF LLC should protect the health and safety of attendees and staff, | |||
| as well as the fiscal health of the organization, with approval from | as well as the fiscal health of the organization, with approval from | |||
| the IESG and the IRTF Chair. The IESG should pursue a later update | the IESG and the Chair of the IRTF. The IESG should pursue a later | |||
| of this document. | update of this document. | |||
| 3.2. IESG and IRTF Chair | 3.2. The IESG and the Chair of the IRTF | |||
| If the IETF LLC assesses there are no fundamental logistical or | If the IETF LLC assesses there are no fundamental logistical or | |||
| financial obstacles to holding a meeting in an emergency situation, | financial obstacles to holding a meeting in an emergency situation, | |||
| the IESG and the IRTF Chair assess if projected attendance is high | the IESG and the Chair of the IRTF assess if projected attendance is | |||
| enough to achieve the benefit of an in-person meeting. The IESG and | high enough to achieve the benefit of an in-person meeting. The IESG | |||
| the IRTF Chair SHOULD cancel the in-person meeting if that benefit is | and the Chair of the IRTF SHOULD cancel the in-person meeting if that | |||
| insufficient. | benefit is insufficient. | |||
| The IESG and the IRTF Chair are discouraged from relying on a simple | The IESG and the Chair of the IRTF are discouraged from relying on a | |||
| head count of expected meeting attendance. Even dramatically smaller | simple head count of expected meeting attendance. Even dramatically | |||
| meetings with large remote participation may be successful. In | smaller meetings with large remote participation may be successful. | |||
| addition to the IETF LLC's estimate, the IESG and the IRTF Chair | In addition to the IETF LLC's estimate, the IESG and the Chair of the | |||
| might consider: | IRTF might consider: | |||
| * Are many working groups and research groups largely unaffected by | * Are many working groups and research groups largely unaffected by | |||
| the restrictions, so that they can operate effectively? | the restrictions, so that they can operate effectively? | |||
| * Is there a critical mass of key personnel at most working group | * Is there a critical mass of key personnel at most working group | |||
| meetings to leverage the advantages of in-person meetings, even if | meetings to leverage the advantages of in-person meetings, even if | |||
| many participants are remote? | many participants are remote? | |||
| 4. Remedies | 4. Remedies | |||
| End of changes. 9 change blocks. | ||||
| 18 lines changed or deleted | 18 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||