| rfc9146v7.txt | rfc9146.txt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| skipping to change at line 212 ¶ | skipping to change at line 212 ¶ | |||
| used to look up the connection and the security association. If the | used to look up the connection and the security association. If the | |||
| tls12_cid content type is not set, then the connection and the | tls12_cid content type is not set, then the connection and the | |||
| security association are looked up by the 5-tuple and a check MUST be | security association are looked up by the 5-tuple and a check MUST be | |||
| made to determine whether a non-zero-length CID is expected. If a | made to determine whether a non-zero-length CID is expected. If a | |||
| non-zero-length CID is expected for the retrieved association, then | non-zero-length CID is expected for the retrieved association, then | |||
| the datagram MUST be treated as invalid, as described in | the datagram MUST be treated as invalid, as described in | |||
| Section 4.1.2.1 of [RFC6347]. | Section 4.1.2.1 of [RFC6347]. | |||
| When receiving a datagram with the tls12_cid content type, the new | When receiving a datagram with the tls12_cid content type, the new | |||
| MAC computation defined in Section 5 MUST be used. When receiving a | MAC computation defined in Section 5 MUST be used. When receiving a | |||
| datagram with the record format (as defined in RFC 6347), the MAC | datagram with the record format defined in RFC 6347, the MAC | |||
| calculation defined in Section 4.1.2 of [RFC6347] MUST be used. | calculation defined in Section 4.1.2 of [RFC6347] MUST be used. | |||
| 4. Record Layer Extensions | 4. Record Layer Extensions | |||
| This specification defines the CID-enhanced record layer format for | This specification defines the CID-enhanced record layer format for | |||
| DTLS 1.2, and [RFC9147] specifies how to carry the CID in DTLS 1.3. | DTLS 1.2, and [RFC9147] specifies how to carry the CID in DTLS 1.3. | |||
| To allow a receiver to determine whether a record has a CID or not, | To allow a receiver to determine whether a record has a CID or not, | |||
| connections that have negotiated this extension use a distinguished | connections that have negotiated this extension use a distinguished | |||
| record type tls12_cid(25). The use of this content type has the | record type tls12_cid(25). The use of this content type has the | |||
| skipping to change at line 631 ¶ | skipping to change at line 631 ¶ | |||
| May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. | May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. | |||
| [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol | [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol | |||
| Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, | Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>. | |||
| 11.2. Informative References | 11.2. Informative References | |||
| [DTLS-RRC] Tschofenig, H., Ed. and T. Fossati, "Return Routability | [DTLS-RRC] Tschofenig, H., Ed. and T. Fossati, "Return Routability | |||
| Check for DTLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.3", Work in Progress, | Check for DTLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.3", Work in Progress, | |||
| Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-00, 9 June 2021, | Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-05, 7 March 2022, | |||
| <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls- | <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls- | |||
| dtls-rrc-00>. | dtls-rrc-05>. | |||
| [RFC6973] Cooper, A., Tschofenig, H., Aboba, B., Peterson, J., | [RFC6973] Cooper, A., Tschofenig, H., Aboba, B., Peterson, J., | |||
| Morris, J., Hansen, M., and R. Smith, "Privacy | Morris, J., Hansen, M., and R. Smith, "Privacy | |||
| Considerations for Internet Protocols", RFC 6973, | Considerations for Internet Protocols", RFC 6973, | |||
| DOI 10.17487/RFC6973, July 2013, | DOI 10.17487/RFC6973, July 2013, | |||
| <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6973>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6973>. | |||
| [RFC9147] Rescorla, E., Tschofenig, H., and N. Modadugu, "The | [RFC9147] Rescorla, E., Tschofenig, H., and N. Modadugu, "The | |||
| Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Protocol Version | Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Protocol Version | |||
| 1.3", RFC 9147, DOI 10.17487/RFC9147, March 2022, | 1.3", RFC 9147, DOI 10.17487/RFC9147, March 2022, | |||
| End of changes. 3 change blocks. | ||||
| 3 lines changed or deleted | 3 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||