<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?> version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc2629 version 1.4.15 -->

<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629-xhtml.ent">
<?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?>
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
<?rfc sortrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc strict="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes"?>
<?rfc inline="yes"?>
<?rfc text-list-symbols="-o*+"?>
<?rfc docmapping="yes"?> [
 <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
 <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
 <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
 <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>

<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="pre5378Trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-13" category="std" number="9146" updates="6347" obsoletes="" submissionType="IETF" category="std" consensus="true" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">

  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.8.0 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="DTLS 1.2 Connection ID">Connection Identifiers Identifier for DTLS 1.2</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-13"/> name="RFC" value="9146"/>
    <author initials="E." surname="Rescorla" fullname="Eric Rescorla" role="editor">
      <organization>RTFM, Inc.</organization>
      <organization>Mozilla</organization>
      <address>
        <email>ekr@rtfm.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="H." surname="Tschofenig" fullname="Hannes Tschofenig" role="editor">
      <organization>Arm Limited</organization>
      <address>
        <email>hannes.tschofenig@arm.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="T." surname="Fossati" fullname="Thomas Fossati">
      <organization>Arm Limited</organization>
      <address>
        <email>thomas.fossati@arm.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author initials="A." surname="Kraus" fullname="Achim Kraus">
      <organization>Bosch.IO GmbH</organization>
      <address>
        <email>achim.kraus@bosch.io</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2021" month="June" day="22"/> year="2022" month="March"/>
    <area>Security</area>
    <workgroup>TLS</workgroup>
    <keyword>Internet-Draft</keyword>

<keyword>NAT rebinding</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document specifies the Connection ID (CID) construct for the Datagram Transport
Layer Security (DTLS) protocol version 1.2.</t>
      <t>A CID is an identifier carried in the record layer header that gives the
recipient additional information for selecting the appropriate security association.
In "classical" DTLS, selecting a security association of an incoming DTLS record
is accomplished with the help of the 5-tuple. If the source IP address and/or
source port changes during the lifetime of an ongoing DTLS session session, then the
receiver will be unable to locate the correct security context.</t>
      <t>The new ciphertext record format with the CID also provides content type encryption
and record-layer record layer padding.</t>
<t>This document updates RFC 6347.</t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section anchor="introduction" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>The Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol <xref target="RFC6347" format="default"/> protocol was designed for
securing connection-less transports, like UDP. data sent over datagram transports (e.g., UDP). DTLS, like TLS, starts
with a handshake, which can be computationally demanding (particularly
when public key cryptography is used). After a successful handshake,
symmetric key cryptography is used to apply data origin
authentication, integrity integrity, and confidentiality protection. This
two-step approach allows endpoints to amortize the cost of the initial
handshake across subsequent application data protection. Ideally, the
second phase where application data is protected lasts over a long
period of time time, since the established keys will only need to be updated
once the key lifetime expires.</t>
      <t>In DTLS as specified in RFC 6347, the IP address and port of the peer are used to
identify the DTLS association. Unfortunately, in some cases, such as NAT rebinding,
these values are insufficient. This is a particular issue in the Internet of Things
when devices enter extended sleep periods to increase their battery lifetime. The
NAT rebinding leads to connection failure, with the resulting cost of a new handshake.</t>
      <t>This document defines an extension to DTLS 1.2 to add a Connection ID (CID) to the
DTLS record layer. The presence of the CID is negotiated via a DTLS
extension.</t>
      <t>Adding a CID to the ciphertext record format presents an opportunity to make
other changes to the record format.  In keeping with the best practices
established by TLS 1.3, the type of the record is encrypted, and
a mechanism is provided for adding padding to obfuscate the plaintext length.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="conventions-and-terminology" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Conventions and Terminology</name>
       <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
"MAY", "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>",
       "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>",
       "<bcp14>SHALL NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>",
       "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>",
       "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
       "<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "OPTIONAL" "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document
       are to be interpreted as described in BCP&nbsp;14
       <xref target="RFC2119" format="default"/> target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174" format="default"/> target="RFC8174"/> when, and only
       when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <t>This document assumes familiarity with DTLS 1.2 <xref target="RFC6347" format="default"/>. The presentation language
used in this document is described in Section 3 of <xref target="RFC8446" format="default"/>.</t> sectionFormat="of" section="3"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="the-connectionid-extension" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>The "connection_id" Extension</name>
      <t>This document defines the "connection_id" extension, which
is used in ClientHello and ServerHello messages.</t>
      <t>The extension type is specified as follows.</t>
      <artwork

<sourcecode name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[ type="tls-presentation"><![CDATA[
  enum {
     connection_id(TBD1),
     connection_id(54), (65535)
  } ExtensionType;
]]></artwork>
]]></sourcecode>
      <t>The extension_data field of this extension, when included in the
ClientHello, MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> contain the ConnectionId structure. This structure
contains the CID value the client wishes the server to use when sending
messages to the client. A zero-length CID value indicates that the client
is prepared to send using a CID but does not wish the server to use one when
sending.</t>
      <artwork
<sourcecode name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[ type="tls-presentation"><![CDATA[
  struct {
      opaque cid<0..2^8-1>;
  } ConnectionId;
]]></artwork>
]]></sourcecode>
      <t>A server willing to use CIDs will respond with a "connection_id"
extension in the ServerHello, containing the CID it wishes the
client to use when sending messages towards it. A zero-length value
indicates that the server will send using the client's CID but does not
wish the client to include a CID when sending.</t>
      <t>Because each party sends the value in the "connection_id" extension it wants to
receive as a CID in encrypted records, it is possible
for an endpoint to use a deployment-specific constant length for such connection
identifiers.  This can in turn ease parsing and connection lookup, lookup --
for example example, by having the length in question be a compile-time constant.
Such implementations MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> still be able to send
CIDs of different length lengths to other parties.
Since the CID length information is not included in the record itself,
implementations that want to use variable-length CIDs are responsible
for constructing the CID in such a way that its length can be determined
on reception.</t>
      <t>In DTLS 1.2, CIDs are exchanged at the beginning of the DTLS
session only. There is no dedicated "CID update" message
that allows new CIDs to be established mid-session, because
DTLS 1.2 in general does not allow TLS 1.3-style post-handshake messages
that do not themselves begin other handshakes. When a DTLS session is
resumed or renegotiated, the "connection_id" extension is negotiated afresh.</t>
      <t>If DTLS peers have not negotiated the use of CIDs, or a zero-length
CID has been advertised for a given direction, then the RFC
6347-defined record format and content type MUST defined in RFC 6347 <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used to send in
the indicated direction(s).</t>
      <t>If DTLS peers have negotiated the use of a non-zero-length CID for a
given direction, then once encryption is enabled enabled, they MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> send with
the record format defined in <xref target="dtls-ciphertext" format="default"/> (see <xref target="record-layer-extensions"/>) with the
new MAC Message Authentication Code (MAC) computation defined in <xref target="mac" format="default"/> and the content type tls12_cid.
Plaintext payloads never use the new record format or the CID content
type.</t>
      <t>When receiving, if the tls12_cid content type is set, then the CID is
used to look up the connection and the security association. If the
tls12_cid content type is not set, then the connection and the security
association is are looked up by the 5-tuple and a check MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be made to
determine whether a non-zero length non-zero-length CID is expected.
If a non-zero-length CID is expected for the retrieved association,
then the datagram MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be treated as invalid, as described
in Section 4.1.2.1 of <xref target="RFC6347" format="default"/>.</t> sectionFormat="of" section="4.1.2.1"/>.</t>
      <t>When receiving a datagram with the tls12_cid content type,
the new MAC computation defined in <xref target="mac" format="default"/> MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used. When receiving a datagram
with the RFC 6347-defined record format, format defined in RFC 6347, the MAC calculation defined in Section 4.1.2
of <xref target="RFC6347" format="default"/> MUST sectionFormat="of" section="4.1.2"/> <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be used.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="record-layer-extensions" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Record Layer Extensions</name>
      <t>This specification defines the DTLS 1.2 CID-enhanced record layer format for DTLS 1.2, and
<xref target="I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13" target="RFC9147" format="default"/> specifies how to carry the CID in DTLS 1.3.</t>
      <t>To allow a receiver to determine whether a record has a CID or not,
connections which that have negotiated this extension use a distinguished
record type tls12_cid(TBD2). Use tls12_cid(25). The use of this content type has the following
three implications:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>The CID field is present and contains one or more bytes.</li>
        <li>The MAC calculation follows the process described in <xref target="mac" format="default"/>.</li>
        <li>The real content type is inside the encryption envelope, as described
below.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>Plaintext records are not impacted by this extension. Hence, the format
of the DTLSPlaintext structure is left unchanged, as shown in <xref target="dtls-plaintext" format="default"/>.</t>
      <figure anchor="dtls-plaintext">
        <name>DTLS 1.2 Plaintext Record Payload.</name>
        <artwork Payload</name>
<sourcecode name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[ type="tls-presentation"><![CDATA[
     struct {
         ContentType type;
         ProtocolVersion version;
         uint16 epoch;
         uint48 sequence_number;
         uint16 length;
         opaque fragment[DTLSPlaintext.length];
     } DTLSPlaintext;
]]></artwork>
]]></sourcecode>
      </figure>
      <t>When CIDs are being used, the content to be sent
is first wrapped along with its content type and optional padding into a
DTLSInnerPlaintext structure. This newly introduced structure is shown in
<xref target="dtls-innerplaintext" format="default"/>.</t>
      <figure anchor="dtls-innerplaintext">
        <name>New DTLSInnerPlaintext Payload Structure.</name>
        <artwork Structure</name>
<sourcecode name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[ type="tls-presentation"><![CDATA[
     struct {
         opaque content[length];
         ContentType real_type;
         uint8 zeros[length_of_padding];
     } DTLSInnerPlaintext;
]]></artwork>
]]></sourcecode>
      </figure>
      <dl>
        <dt>
content  </dt>
content:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>Corresponds to the fragment of a given length.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>
real_type  </dt>
real_type:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>The content type describing the cleartext payload.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>
zeros  </dt>
zeros:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>An arbitrary-length run of zero-valued bytes may appear in
the cleartext after the type field.  This provides an opportunity
for senders to pad any DTLS record by a chosen amount as long as
the total stays within record size limits.  See Section 5.4 of <xref target="RFC8446" format="default"/> sectionFormat="of" section="5.4"/> for more details. (Note that the term TLSInnerPlaintext in
RFC 8446 refers to DTLSInnerPlaintext in this specification.)</t>
        </dd>
      </dl>
      <t>The DTLSInnerPlaintext byte sequence is then encrypted. To create the
DTLSCiphertext structure shown in <xref target="dtls-ciphertext" format="default"/> format="default"/>, the CID is added.</t>
      <figure anchor="dtls-ciphertext">
        <name>DTLS 1.2 CID-enhanced CID-Enhanced Ciphertext Record.</name>
        <artwork Record</name>
<sourcecode name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[ type="tls-presentation"><![CDATA[
     struct {
         ContentType outer_type = tls12_cid;
         ProtocolVersion version;
         uint16 epoch;
         uint48 sequence_number;
         opaque cid[cid_length];               // New field
         uint16 length;
         opaque enc_content[DTLSCiphertext.length];
     } DTLSCiphertext;
]]></artwork>
]]></sourcecode>
      </figure>
      <dl>
        <dt>
outer_type  </dt>
outer_type:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>The outer content type of a DTLSCiphertext record carrying a CID
is always set to tls12_cid(TBD2). tls12_cid(25). The real content
type of the record is found in DTLSInnerPlaintext.real_type after
decryption.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>
cid  </dt>
cid:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>The CID value, cid_length bytes long, as agreed at the time the extension
has been negotiated.  Recall that (as discussed previously) each peer chooses
the CID value it will receive and use to identify the connection, so an
implementation can choose to always receive CIDs of a fixed length.  If,
however, an implementation chooses to receive different lengths CIDs of CID, different lengths,
the assigned CID values must be self-delineating self-delineating, since there is no other
mechanism available to determine what connection (and thus, what CID length)
is in use.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>
enc_content  </dt>
enc_content:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>The encrypted form of the serialized DTLSInnerPlaintext structure.</t>
        </dd>
      </dl>
      <t>All other fields are as defined in RFC 6347.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="mac" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Record Payload Protection</name>
      <t>Several types of ciphers have been defined for use with TLS and DTLS DTLS, and the
MAC calculations for those ciphers differ slightly.</t>
      <t>This specification modifies the MAC calculation as defined in <xref target="RFC6347" format="default"/> and
<xref target="RFC7366" format="default"/>, as well as the definition of the additional data used with AEAD Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD)
ciphers provided in <xref target="RFC6347" format="default"/>, for records with content type tls12_cid.  The
modified algorithm MUST NOT <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be applied to records that do not carry a CID, i.e.,
records with content type other than tls12_cid.</t>
      <t>The following fields are defined in this document; all other fields are as
defined in the cited documents.</t>
      <dl>
        <dt>
cid  </dt>
cid:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>Value of the negotiated CID (variable length).</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>
cid_length  </dt>
cid_length:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>1 byte field indicating the
          <t>The length (in bytes) of the negotiated CID.</t> CID (one-byte integer).</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>
length_of_DTLSInnerPlaintext  </dt>
length_of_DTLSInnerPlaintext:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>The length (in bytes) of the serialized DTLSInnerPlaintext (two-byte integer).
The length MUST NOT <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> exceed 2^14.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>
seq_num_placeholder  </dt>
seq_num_placeholder:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>8 bytes of 0xff</t> 0xff.</t>
        </dd>
      </dl>
      <t>Note that "+" denotes concatenation.</t>
      <section anchor="block-ciphers" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Block Ciphers</name>
        <t>The following MAC algorithm applies to block ciphers
that do not use the Encrypt-then-MAC processing
described in <xref target="RFC7366" format="default"/>.</t>
        <artwork
<sourcecode name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[ type="tls-presentation"><![CDATA[
    MAC(MAC_write_key,
        seq_num_placeholder +
        tls12_cid +
        cid_length +
        tls12_cid +
        DTLSCiphertext.version +
        epoch +
        sequence_number +
        cid +
        length_of_DTLSInnerPlaintext +
        DTLSInnerPlaintext.content +
        DTLSInnerPlaintext.real_type +
        DTLSInnerPlaintext.zeros
    );
]]></artwork>
]]></sourcecode>
        <t>The rationale behind this construction is to separate the MAC input
for DTLS without the connection ID from the MAC input with the
connection ID. The former always consists of a sequence number
followed by some other content type other than tls12_cid; the latter
always consists of the seq_num_placeholder followed by tls12_cid.
Although 2^64-1 is potentially a valid sequence number, tls12_cid
will never be a valid content type when the connection ID is not in use.
In addition, the epoch and sequence_number are now fed into
the MAC in the same order as they appear on the wire.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="block-ciphers-with-encrypt-then-mac-processing" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Block Ciphers with Encrypt-then-MAC processing</name> Processing</name>
        <t>The following MAC algorithm applies to block ciphers
that use the Encrypt-then-MAC processing
described in <xref target="RFC7366" format="default"/>.</t>
        <artwork
<sourcecode name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[ type="tls-presentation"><![CDATA[
    MAC(MAC_write_key,
        seq_num_placeholder +
        tls12_cid +
        cid_length +
        tls12_cid +
        DTLSCiphertext.version +
        epoch +
        sequence_number +
        cid +
        DTLSCiphertext.length +
        IV +
        ENC(content + padding + padding_length));
]]></artwork> padding_length)
    );
]]></sourcecode>
      </section>
      <section anchor="aead-ciphers" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>AEAD Ciphers</name>
        <t>For ciphers utilizing authenticated encryption with additional
data AEAD,
the following modification is made to the additional data calculation.</t>
        <artwork
<sourcecode name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[ type="tls-presentation"><![CDATA[
    additional_data = seq_num_placeholder +
                      tls12_cid +
                      cid_length +
                      tls12_cid +
                      DTLSCiphertext.version +
                      epoch +
                      sequence_number +
                      cid +
                      length_of_DTLSInnerPlaintext;
]]></artwork>
]]></sourcecode>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="peer-address-update" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Peer Address Update</name>
      <t>When a record with a CID is received that has a source address
different from the one currently associated with the DTLS connection,
the receiver MUST NOT <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> replace the address it uses for sending records
to its peer with the source address specified in the received datagram,
unless the following three conditions are met:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>The received datagram has been cryptographically verified using
the DTLS record layer processing procedures.</li>
        <li>The received datagram is "newer" (in terms of both epoch and sequence
number) than the newest datagram received. Reordered datagrams that are
sent prior to a change in a peer address might otherwise cause a valid
address change to be reverted. This also limits the ability of an attacker
to use replayed datagrams to force a spurious address change, which
could result in denial of service. An attacker might be able to succeed
in changing a peer address if they are able to rewrite source addresses
and if replayed packets are able to arrive before any original.</li>
        <li>There is a strategy for ensuring that the new peer address is able to
receive and process DTLS records. No strategy is mandated by this specification specification,
but see note (*) below.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>The conditions above are necessary to protect against attacks that use datagrams with
spoofed addresses or replayed datagrams to trigger attacks. Note that there
is no requirement for the use of the anti-replay window mechanism defined in
Section 4.1.2.6 of DTLS 1.2.
<xref target="RFC6347" sectionFormat="of" section="4.1.2.6"/>. Both solutions, the "anti-replay window" or
"newer" algorithm, will prevent address updates from replay attacks while the
latter will only apply to peer address updates and the former applies to any
application layer traffic.</t>
      <t>Note that datagrams that pass the DTLS cryptographic verification procedures
but do not trigger a change of peer address are still valid DTLS records and
are still to be passed to the application.</t>
      <t>(*)
      <t indent="3">(*) Note: Application protocols that implement protection against spoofed addresses
depend on being aware of changes in peer addresses so that they can engage the necessary
mechanisms. When delivered such an event, an application layer-specific address validation mechanism specific to the application layer can be triggered, triggered -- for example example, one that is based on
successful exchange of a minimal amount of ping-pong traffic with the peer.
Alternatively, an a DTLS-specific mechanism may be used, as described in
<xref target="I-D.ietf-tls-dtls-rrc" target="DTLS-RRC" format="default"/>.</t>
      <t>DTLS implementations MUST <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> silently discard records with bad MACs or that are
otherwise invalid.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="examples" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Examples</name>
      <name>Example</name>
      <t><xref target="dtls-example2" format="default"/> shows an example exchange where a CID is
used uni-directionally unidirectionally from the client to the server. To indicate that
a zero-length CID is present in the "connection_id" extension extension,
we use the notation 'connection_id=empty'.</t>
      <figure anchor="dtls-example2">
        <name>Example DTLS 1.2 Exchange with CID</name>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
Client                                             Server
------                                             ------

ClientHello                 -------->
(connection_id=empty)

                            <--------      HelloVerifyRequest
                                                     (cookie)

ClientHello                 -------->
(connection_id=empty)
(cookie)

                                                  ServerHello
                                          (connection_id=100)
                                                  Certificate
                                            ServerKeyExchange
                                           CertificateRequest
                            <--------         ServerHelloDone

Certificate
ClientKeyExchange
CertificateVerify
[ChangeCipherSpec]
Finished                    -------->
<CID=100>

                                           [ChangeCipherSpec]
                            <--------                Finished

Application Data            ========>
<CID=100>

                            <========        Application Data

Legend:

<...> indicates that a connection id ID is used in the record layer
(...) indicates an extension
[...] indicates a payload other than a handshake message
]]></artwork>
      </figure>
      <t>Note:
      <t indent="3">Note: In the example exchange exchange, the CID is included in the record layer
once encryption is enabled. In DTLS 1.2 1.2, only one handshake message is
encrypted, namely the Finished message. Since the example shows how to
use the CID for payloads sent from the client to the server, only the
record layer payloads containing the Finished message or application data
include a CID.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="priv-cons" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Privacy Considerations</name>
      <t>The CID replaces the previously used 5-tuple and, as such, introduces
an identifier that remains persistent during the lifetime of a DTLS connection.
Every identifier introduces the risk of linkability, as explained in <xref target="RFC6973" format="default"/>.</t>
      <t>An on-path adversary observing the DTLS protocol exchanges between the
DTLS client and the DTLS server is able to link the observed payloads to all
subsequent payloads carrying the same ID pair (for bi-directional bidirectional
communication).  Without multi-homing multihoming or mobility, the use of the CID
exposes the same information as the 5-tuple.</t>
      <t>With multi-homing, multihoming, a passive attacker is able to correlate the communication
interaction over the two paths. The lack of a CID update mechanism
in DTLS 1.2 makes this extension unsuitable for mobility scenarios where
correlation must be considered. Deployments that use DTLS in multi-homing multihoming
environments and are concerned about these aspects SHOULD <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> refuse to use CIDs in
DTLS 1.2 and switch to DTLS 1.3 where a CID update mechanism is provided and
sequence number encryption is available.</t>
      <t>The
      <t>This specification introduces record padding for the CID-enhanced record layer,
which is a privacy feature not available with the original DTLS 1.2 specification.
Padding allows to inflate the size of the ciphertext to be inflated, making traffic analysis
more difficult. More details about record padding can be found in Section 5.4
Section&nbsp;<xref target="RFC8446" section="5.4"
 sectionFormat="bare"/> and Appendix E.3 Appendix&nbsp;<xref target="RFC8446" section="E.3"
 sectionFormat="bare"/> of RFC 8446.</t> <xref target="RFC8446"/>.</t>
      <t>Finally, endpoints can use the CID to attach arbitrary per-connection metadata
to each record they receive on a given connection. This may be used as a mechanism to communicate
per-connection information to on-path observers. There is no straightforward way to
address this concern with CIDs that contain arbitrary values. Implementations
concerned about this aspect SHOULD <bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14> refuse to use CIDs.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-cons" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>An on-path adversary can create reflection attacks
against third parties because a DTLS peer has no means to distinguish a
genuine address update event (for example, due to a NAT rebinding) from one
that is malicious. This attack is of particular concern when the request is small
and the response large. See <xref target="peer-address-update" format="default"/> for more
on address updates.</t>
      <t>Additionally, an attacker able to observe the data traffic exchanged between
two DTLS peers is able to replay datagrams with modified IP address/port addresses / port numbers.</t>
      <t>The topic of peer address updates is discussed in <xref target="peer-address-update" format="default"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This document requests implements three actions from IANA.</t> IANA updates.</t>
      <section anchor="extra-column-to-tls-extensiontype-values-registry" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Extra Column Added to the TLS ExtensionType Values Registry</name>
        <t>IANA is requested to add has added an extra column named "DTLS-Only" to the
"TLS ExtensionType Values" registry to indicate whether an extension is only
applicable to DTLS and to include this document as an additional reference
for the registry.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="entry-to-the-tls-extensiontype-values-registry" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Entry to
        <name>New Entry in the TLS ExtensionType Values Registry</name>
        <t>IANA is requested to allocate has allocated an entry to in the existing "TLS ExtensionType
Values" registry, registry for connection_id(TBD1) connection_id(54), as described
in the table below. Although the value 53 has had been allocated by early allocation for a previous version of this document, it
is incompatible with this document.
Once this document is approved for publication,
Therefore, the early allocation will be has been deprecated
in favor of this assignment.</t>
        <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
Value   Extension Name  TLS 1.3  DTLS-Only  Recommended  Reference
--------------------------------------------------------------------
TBD1    connection_id   CH, SH   Y          N           [[This doc]]
]]></artwork>
<table anchor="iana-tls-ext-entry">
  <name></name>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>Value</th>
      <th>Extension Name</th>
      <th>TLS 1.3</th>
      <th>DTLS-Only</th>
      <th>Recommended</th>
      <th>Reference</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>54</td>
      <td>connection_id</td>
      <td>CH, SH</td>
      <td>Y</td>
      <td>N</td>
      <td>RFC 9146</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
        <t>A new column "DTLS-Only" is column, "DTLS-Only", has been added to the registry.
The valid entries are "Y" if the extension is only applicable to DTLS, "N" otherwise.
All the pre-existing entries are given the value "N".</t>
        <t>Note:
        <t indent="3">Note: The value "N" in the Recommended "Recommended" column is set because this
extension is intended only for specific use cases. This document describes
the behavior of this extension for DTLS 1.2 only; it is not applicable to TLS, and
its usage for DTLS 1.3 is described in <xref target="I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13" target="RFC9147" format="default"/>.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="entry-to-the-tls-contenttype-registry" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Entry to
        <name>New Entry in the TLS ContentType Registry</name>
        <t>IANA is requested to allocate tls12_cid(TBD2) has allocated tls12_cid(25) in the "TLS ContentType"
registry. The tls12_cid ContentType content type is only applicable to DTLS 1.2.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>

    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification.  These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents.  This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6347" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6347">
          <front>
            <title>Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2</title>
            <author fullname="E. Rescorla" initials="E." surname="Rescorla">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="N. Modadugu" initials="N." surname="Modadugu">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="January" year="2012"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies version 1.2 of the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol.  The DTLS protocol provides communications privacy for datagram protocols.  The protocol allows client/server applications to communicate in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, or message forgery.  The DTLS protocol is based on the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol and provides equivalent security guarantees.  Datagram semantics of the underlying transport are preserved by the DTLS protocol.  This document updates DTLS 1.0 to work with TLS version 1.2.  [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6347"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6347"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8446" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446">
          <front>
            <title>The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3</title>
            <author fullname="E. Rescorla" initials="E." surname="Rescorla">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="August" year="2018"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies version 1.3 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol.  TLS allows client/server applications to communicate over the Internet in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, and message forgery.</t>
              <t>This document updates RFCs 5705 and 6066, and obsoletes RFCs 5077, 5246, and 6961.  This document also specifies new requirements for TLS 1.2 implementations.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8446"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8446"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol  specifications.  This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the  defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7366" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7366">
          <front>
            <title>Encrypt-then-MAC for Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)</title>
            <author fullname="P. Gutmann" initials="P." surname="Gutmann">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="September" year="2014"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes a means of negotiating the use of the encrypt-then-MAC security mechanism in place of the existing MAC-then-encrypt mechanism in Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS).  The MAC-then-encrypt mechanism has been the subject of a number of security vulnerabilities over a period of many years.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7366"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7366"/>
        </reference>

<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.2119.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6347.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8446.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8174.xml"/>
<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7366.xml"/>

      </references>

      <references>

        <name>Informative References</name>

<xi:include href="https://xml2rfc.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6973.xml"/>

<!-- draft-ietf-tls-dtls13 (RFC 9147) -->
<reference anchor="RFC6973" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6973">
          <front>
            <title>Privacy Considerations for Internet Protocols</title>
            <author fullname="A. Cooper" initials="A." surname="Cooper">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="H. Tschofenig" initials="H." surname="Tschofenig">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="B. Aboba" initials="B." surname="Aboba">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Peterson" initials="J." surname="Peterson">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="J. Morris" initials="J." surname="Morris">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="M. Hansen" initials="M." surname="Hansen">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <author fullname="R. Smith" initials="R." surname="Smith">
              <organization/>
            </author>
            <date month="July" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document offers guidance for developing privacy considerations for inclusion in protocol specifications.  It aims to make designers, implementers, and users of Internet protocols aware of privacy-related design choices.  It suggests that whether any individual RFC warrants a specific privacy considerations section will depend on the document's content.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6973"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6973"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-tls-dtls13" target="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-43.txt"> anchor='RFC9147' target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9147">
<front>
<title>The Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Protocol Version 1.3</title>
<author fullname="Eric Rescorla">
              <organization>RTFM, Inc.</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Hannes Tschofenig">
              <organization>Arm Limited</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Nagendra Modadugu">
              <organization>Google, Inc.</organization> initials='E' surname='Rescorla' fullname='Eric Rescorla'>
<organization />
</author>
<author initials='H' surname='Tschofenig' fullname='Hannes Tschofenig'>
<organization />
</author>
<author initials='N' surname='Modadugu' fullname='Nagendra Modadugu'>
<organization />
</author>
<date day="30" month="April" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document specifies Version 1.3 of the Datagram Transport Layer
   Security (DTLS) protocol.  DTLS 1.3 allows client/server applications
   to communicate over the Internet in a way that is designed to prevent
   eavesdropping, tampering, and message forgery.

   The DTLS 1.3 protocol is intentionally based on the Transport Layer
   Security (TLS) 1.3 protocol and provides equivalent security
   guarantees with the exception of order protection/non-replayability.
   Datagram semantics of the underlying transport are preserved by the
   DTLS protocol.

   This document obsoletes RFC 6347.

              </t>
            </abstract> year='2022' month='March' />
</front>
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-43"/> name="RFC" value="9147"/>
<seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9147"/>
</reference>

<!-- draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc (I-D Exists) ("long way"; one author is editor) -->
<reference anchor="I-D.ietf-tls-dtls-rrc" target="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-00.txt"> anchor='DTLS-RRC'>
<front>
<title>Return Routability Check for DTLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.3</title>
<author fullname="Hannes Tschofenig">
              <organization>Arm Limited</organization> initials='H' surname='Tschofenig' fullname='Hannes Tschofenig' role="editor">
    <organization />
</author>
<author fullname="Thomas Fossati">
              <organization>Arm Limited</organization> initials='T' surname='Fossati' fullname='Thomas Fossati'>
    <organization />
</author>
<date day="9" month="June" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document specifies a return routability check for use in context
   of the Connection ID (CID) construct for the Datagram Transport Layer
   Security (DTLS) protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3.

Discussion Venues

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   Discussion of this document takes place on the Transport Layer
   Security Working Group mailing list (tls@ietf.org), which is archived
   at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc.

              </t>
            </abstract> month='March' day='7' year='2022'/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-00"/> name='Internet-Draft' value='draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-05' />
</reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <section anchor="history" numbered="true" anchor="acknowledgements" numbered="false" toc="default">
      <name>History</name>
      <t>RFC EDITOR: PLEASE REMOVE THE THIS SECTION</t>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-12</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Improved peer address update text</li>
        <li>Editorial improvements</li>
        <li>Clarification regarding the use of the TLS ExtensionType Values Registry</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-11</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Enhanced IANA considerations section</li>
        <li>Clarifications regarding CID negotiation and zero-length CIDs</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-10</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Clarify privacy impact.</li>
        <li>Have security considerations point to <xref target="peer-address-update" format="default"/>.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-09</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Changed MAC/additional data calculation.</li>
        <li>Disallow sending MAC failure fatal alerts to non-validated peers.</li>
        <li>Incorporated editorial review comments by Ben Kaduk.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-08</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>RRC draft moved from normative to informative.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-07</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Wording changes in the security and privacy
consideration and the peer address update
sections.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-06</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Updated IANA considerations</li>
        <li>Enhanced security consideration section to describe a potential
man-in-the-middle attack concerning address validation.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-05</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Restructed Section 5 "Record Payload Protection"</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-04</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Editorial simplifications
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>We would like to the 'Record Layer Extensions' and the 'Record Payload Protection' sections.</li>
        <li>Added MAC calculations thank <contact fullname="Hanno Becker"/>, <contact fullname="
Martin Duke"/>, <contact fullname="Lars Eggert"/>, <contact fullname="Ben Kaduk"/>, <contact fullname="Warren Kumari"/>,
<contact fullname="Francesca Palombini"/>, <contact fullname="Tom Petch"/>, <contact fullname="John Scudder"/>, <contact fullname="Sean Turner"/>, <contact fullname="Éric Vyncke"/>, and <contact fullname="Robert Wilton"/>
for block ciphers with and without Encrypt-then-MAC processing.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-03</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Updated list of contributors</li>
        <li>Updated list of contributors and acknowledgements</li>
        <li>Updated example</li>
        <li>Changed record layer design</li>
        <li>Changed record payload protection</li>
        <li>Updated introduction and security consideration section</li>
        <li>Author- and affiliation changes</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-02</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Move their review comments.</t>
      <t>Finally, we want to internal content types a la DTLS 1.3.</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-01</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Remove 1.3 based on thank the WG consensus at IETF 101</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-00</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Initial working group version
(containing a solution for DTLS 1.2 and 1.3)</li>
      </ul>
      <t>draft-rescorla-tls-dtls-connection-id-00</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Initial version</li>
      </ul>
    </section>
    <section anchor="working-group-information" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Working TLS Working Group Information</name>
      <t>RFC EDITOR: PLEASE REMOVE THE THIS SECTION</t>
      <t>The discussion list chairs, <contact fullname="Chris Wood"/>, <contact fullname="Joseph Salowey"/>, and
<contact fullname="Sean Turner"/>, for the IETF TLS working group is located at the e-mail
address <eref target="mailto:tls@ietf.org">tls@ietf.org</eref>. Information on the group their patience, support, and information on how to
subscribe to the list is at <eref target="https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls">https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls</eref></t>
      <t>Archives of the list can be found at:
<eref target="https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/index.html">https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/index.html</eref></t> feedback.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="contributors" numbered="true" numbered="false" toc="default">
      <name>Contributors</name>
      <t>Many people have contributed to this specification, and we would like to thank
the following individuals for their contributions:</t>
      <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
* Yin Xinxing
  Huawei
  yinxinxing@huawei.com
]]></artwork>
      <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
* Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
  RedHat
  nmav@redhat.com
]]></artwork>
      <artwork name="" type="" align="left" alt=""><![CDATA[
* Tobias Gondrom
  tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org
]]></artwork>

      <contact fullname="Yin Xinxing">
        <organization>Huawei</organization>
        <address>
          <email>yinxinxing@huawei.com</email>
        </address>
      </contact>

      <contact fullname="Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos">
        <organization>RedHat</organization>
        <address>
          <email>nmav@redhat.com</email>
        </address>
      </contact>

      <contact fullname="Tobias Gondrom">
        <organization></organization>
        <address>
          <email>tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org</email>
        </address>
      </contact>

      <t>Additionally, we would like to thank the Connection ID task force team members:</t>
      <ul spacing="normal">
        <li>Martin Thomson (Mozilla)</li>
        <li>Christian Huitema
        <li><t><contact fullname="Martin Thomson"/> (Mozilla)</t></li>
        <li><t><contact fullname="Christian Huitema"/> (Private Octopus Inc.)</li>
        <li>Jana Iyengar (Google)</li>
        <li>Daniel Inc.)</t></li>
        <li><t><contact fullname="Jana Iyengar"/> (Google)</t></li>
        <li><t><contact fullname="Daniel Kahn Gillmor (ACLU)</li>
        <li>Patrick McManus (Mozilla)</li>
        <li>Ian Swett (Google)</li>
        <li>Mark Nottingham (Fastly)</li> Gillmor"/> (ACLU)</t></li>
        <li><t><contact fullname="Patrick McManus"/> (Mozilla)</t></li>
        <li><t><contact fullname="Ian Swett"/> (Google)</t></li>
        <li><t><contact fullname="Mark Nottingham"/> (Fastly)</t></li>
      </ul>
      <t>The task force team discussed various design ideas, including cryptographically generated session
ids
IDs using hash chains and public key encryption, but dismissed them due to their
inefficiency. The approach described in this specification is the
simplest possible design that works works, given the limitations of DTLS 1.2. DTLS 1.3 provides
better privacy features features, and developers are encouraged to switch to the new version of DTLS.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="acknowledgements" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>We would like to thank Hanno Becker, Martin Duke, Lars Eggert, Ben Kaduk, Warren Kumari,
Francesca Palombini, Tom Petch, John Scudder, Sean Turner, Eric Vyncke, and Robert Wilton
for their review comments.</t>
      <t>Finally, we want to thank the IETF TLS working group chairs, Chris Wood, Joseph Salowey, and
Sean Turner, for their patience, support and feedback.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->
</rfc>