rfc9232v2.txt   rfc9232.txt 
skipping to change at line 12 skipping to change at line 12
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) H. Song Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) H. Song
Request for Comments: 9232 Futurewei Request for Comments: 9232 Futurewei
Category: Informational F. Qin Category: Informational F. Qin
ISSN: 2070-1721 China Mobile ISSN: 2070-1721 China Mobile
P. Martinez-Julia P. Martinez-Julia
NICT NICT
L. Ciavaglia L. Ciavaglia
Rakuten Mobile Rakuten Mobile
A. Wang A. Wang
China Telecom China Telecom
April 2022 May 2022
Network Telemetry Framework Network Telemetry Framework
Abstract Abstract
Network telemetry is a technology for gaining network insight and Network telemetry is a technology for gaining network insight and
facilitating efficient and automated network management. It facilitating efficient and automated network management. It
encompasses various techniques for remote data generation, encompasses various techniques for remote data generation,
collection, correlation, and consumption. This document describes an collection, correlation, and consumption. This document describes an
architectural framework for network telemetry, motivated by architectural framework for network telemetry, motivated by
skipping to change at line 894 skipping to change at line 894
reasons. reasons.
* Conventional OAM-based approaches for control plane KPI * Conventional OAM-based approaches for control plane KPI
measurement, which include Ping (L3), Traceroute (L3), Y.1731 measurement, which include Ping (L3), Traceroute (L3), Y.1731
[y1731] (L2), and so on. One common issue behind these methods is [y1731] (L2), and so on. One common issue behind these methods is
that they only measure the KPIs instead of reflecting the actual that they only measure the KPIs instead of reflecting the actual
running status of these protocols, making them less effective or running status of these protocols, making them less effective or
efficient for control plane troubleshooting and network efficient for control plane troubleshooting and network
optimization. optimization.
* How more research is needed for the BGP monitioring protocol * How more research is needed for the BGP monitoring protocol (BMP).
(BMP). BMP is an example of the control plane telemetry; it is BMP is an example of the control plane telemetry; it is currently
currently used for monitoring BGP routes and enables rich used for monitoring BGP routes and enables rich applications, such
applications, such as BGP peer analysis, Autonomous System (AS) as BGP peer analysis, Autonomous System (AS) analysis, prefix
analysis, prefix analysis, and security analysis. However, the analysis, and security analysis. However, the monitoring of other
monitoring of other layers, protocols, and the cross-layer, cross- layers, protocols, and the cross-layer, cross-protocol KPI
protocol KPI correlations are still in their infancy (e.g., IGP correlations are still in their infancy (e.g., IGP monitoring is
monitoring is not as extensive as BMP), which requires further not as extensive as BMP), which requires further research.
research.
Note that the requirement and solutions for network congestion Note that the requirement and solutions for network congestion
avoidance are also applicable to the control plane telemetry. avoidance are also applicable to the control plane telemetry.
3.1.3. Forwarding Plane Telemetry 3.1.3. Forwarding Plane Telemetry
An effective forwarding plane telemetry system relies on the data An effective forwarding plane telemetry system relies on the data
that the network device can expose. The quality, quantity, and that the network device can expose. The quality, quantity, and
timeliness of data must meet some stringent requirements. This timeliness of data must meet some stringent requirements. This
raises some challenges for the network data plane devices where the raises some challenges for the network data plane devices where the
skipping to change at line 1352 skipping to change at line 1351
[IPPM-IOAM-DIRECT-EXPORT] [IPPM-IOAM-DIRECT-EXPORT]
Song, H., Gafni, B., Zhou, T., Li, Z., Brockners, F., Song, H., Gafni, B., Zhou, T., Li, Z., Brockners, F.,
Bhandari, S., Ed., Sivakolundu, R., and T. Mizrahi, Ed., Bhandari, S., Ed., Sivakolundu, R., and T. Mizrahi, Ed.,
"In-situ OAM Direct Exporting", Work in Progress, "In-situ OAM Direct Exporting", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-07, 13 Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-07, 13
October 2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ October 2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-07>. draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-07>.
[IPPM-POSTCARD-BASED-TELEMETRY] [IPPM-POSTCARD-BASED-TELEMETRY]
Song, H., Mirsky, G., Filsfils, C., Abdelsalam, A., Zhou, Song, H., Mirsky, G., Filsfils, C., Abdelsalam, A., Zhou,
T., Li, Z., Shin, J., and K. Lee, "In-Situ OAM Marking- T., Li, Z., Mishra, G., Shin, J., and K. Lee, "In-Situ OAM
based Direct Export", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, Marking-based Direct Export", Work in Progress, Internet-
draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-11, 15 November Draft, draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-12, 12 May
2021, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-song- 2022, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-song-
ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-11>. ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-12>.
[NETCONF-DISTRIB-NOTIF] [NETCONF-DISTRIB-NOTIF]
Zhou, T., Zheng, G., Voit, E., Graf, T., and P. Francois, Zhou, T., Zheng, G., Voit, E., Graf, T., and P. Francois,
"Subscription to Distributed Notifications", Work in "Subscription to Distributed Notifications", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-distributed- Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-netconf-distributed-
notif-03, 10 January 2022, notif-03, 10 January 2022,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf- <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-
distributed-notif-03>. distributed-notif-03>.
[NETCONF-UDP-NOTIF] [NETCONF-UDP-NOTIF]
skipping to change at line 1586 skipping to change at line 1585
Framework", RFC 8924, DOI 10.17487/RFC8924, October 2020, Framework", RFC 8924, DOI 10.17487/RFC8924, October 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8924>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8924>.
[RFC9069] Evens, T., Bayraktar, S., Bhardwaj, M., and P. Lucente, [RFC9069] Evens, T., Bayraktar, S., Bhardwaj, M., and P. Lucente,
"Support for Local RIB in the BGP Monitoring Protocol "Support for Local RIB in the BGP Monitoring Protocol
(BMP)", RFC 9069, DOI 10.17487/RFC9069, February 2022, (BMP)", RFC 9069, DOI 10.17487/RFC9069, February 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9069>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9069>.
[RFC9197] Brockners, F., Ed., Bhandari, S., Ed., and T. Mizrahi, [RFC9197] Brockners, F., Ed., Bhandari, S., Ed., and T. Mizrahi,
Ed., "Data Fields for In Situ Operations, Administration, Ed., "Data Fields for In Situ Operations, Administration,
and Maintence (IOAM)", RFC 9197, DOI 10.17487/RFC9197, and Maintenance (IOAM)", RFC 9197, DOI 10.17487/RFC9197,
April 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9197>. May 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9197>.
[W3C.REC-xml-20081126] [W3C.REC-xml-20081126]
Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, M., Maler, E., and Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, M., Maler, E., and
F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth
Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC- Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-
xml-20081126, November 2008, xml-20081126, November 2008,
<https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126>. <https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126>.
[y1731] ITU-T, "Operations, administration and maintenance (OAM) [y1731] ITU-T, "Operations, administration and maintenance (OAM)
functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks", functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks",
 End of changes. 4 change blocks. 
17 lines changed or deleted 16 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/