rfc9456.original   rfc9456-prop.txt 
Internet Engineering Task Force K. Vaughn, Ed. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) K. Vaughn, Ed.
Internet-Draft Trevilon LLC Request for Comments: 9456 Trevilon LLC
Updates: 6353 (if approved) 8 May 2023 Updates: 6353 November 2023
Intended status: Standards Track Category: Standards Track
Expires: 9 November 2023 ISSN: 2070-1721
Updates to the TLS Transport Model for SNMP Updates to the TLS Transport Model for SNMP
draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-15
Abstract Abstract
This document updates RFC 6353 "Transport Layer Security (TLS) This document updates RFC 6353 ("Transport Layer Security (TLS)
Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)")
to reflect changes necessary to support Transport Layer Security to reflect changes necessary to support Transport Layer Security
Version 1.3 (TLS 1.3) and Datagram Transport Layer Security Version version 1.3 (TLS 1.3) and Datagram Transport Layer Security version
1.3 (DTLS 1.3), which are jointly known as "(D)TLS 1.3". This 1.3 (DTLS 1.3), which are jointly known as "(D)TLS 1.3". This
document is compatible with (D)TLS 1.2 and is intended to be document is compatible with (D)TLS 1.2 and is intended to be
compatible with future versions of SNMP and (D)TLS. compatible with future versions of SNMP and (D)TLS.
This document updates the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB as defined in RFC 6353. This document updates the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB as defined in RFC 6353.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This is an Internet Standards Track document.
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference received public review and has been approved for publication by the
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
This Internet-Draft will expire on 9 November 2023. Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9456.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights publication of this document. Please review these documents
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. Introduction
1.1. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
2. Changes from RFC 6353 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2. Conventions
2.1. TLSTM Fingerprint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Changes from RFC 6353
2.2. Security Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1. TLSTM Fingerprint
2.3. (D)TLS Version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2. Security Level
3. Additional Rules for TLS 1.3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.3. (D)TLS Version
3.1. Zero Round Trip Time Resumption (0-RTT) . . . . . . . . . 6 3. Additional Rules for TLS 1.3
3.2. TLS cipher suites, extensions and protocol invariants . . 6 3.1. Zero Round-Trip Time Resumption (0-RTT)
4. MIB Module Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2. TLS Cipher Suites, Extensions, and Protocol Invariants
5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 4. MIB Module Definitions
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 5. Security Considerations
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 6. IANA Considerations
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7. References
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.1. Normative References
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 7.2. Informative References
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Acknowledgements
Author's Address
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
This document updates and clarifies how the rules of [RFC6353] apply This document updates and clarifies how the rules of [RFC6353] apply
when using Transport Layer Security (TLS) or Datagram Transport Layer when using Transport Layer Security (TLS) or Datagram Transport Layer
Security (DTLS) versions later than 1.2. This document jointly Security (DTLS) versions later than 1.2. This document jointly
refers to these two protocols as "(D)TLS". The update also refers to these two protocols as "(D)TLS". The update also
emphasizes the [RFC8996] requirement that prohibits the use of TLS emphasizes the requirement in [RFC8996] prohibiting the use of TLS
versions prior to TLS 1.2 when using SNMP. Although the text of this versions prior to TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] when using SNMP. Although the
document specifically references SNMPv3 and (D)TLS 1.3, this document text of this document specifically references SNMPv3 and (D)TLS 1.3,
may be applicable to future versions of these protocols and is this document may be applicable to future versions of these protocols
backwards compatible with (D)TLS 1.2. and is backwards compatible with (D)TLS 1.2.
1.1. Conventions 1.1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
Within this document the terms "TLS", "DTLS", and "(D)TLS" apply to For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to Section 7 of
[RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in RFCs
2578, 2579, and 2580 [STD58].
1.2. Conventions
Within this document, the terms "TLS", "DTLS", and "(D)TLS" apply to
all versions of the indicated protocols. The term "SNMP" means all versions of the indicated protocols. The term "SNMP" means
"SNMPv3" unless a specific version number is indicated. Specific "SNMPv3" unless a specific version number is indicated. Specific
version numbers are used when the text needs to emphasize version version numbers are used when the text needs to emphasize version
numbers. numbers.
For consistency with SNMP-related specifications, this document For consistency with SNMP-related specifications, this document
favors terminology as defined in [STD62], rather than favoring favors terminology as defined in [STD62], rather than favoring
terminology that is consistent with non-SNMP specifications. This is terminology that is consistent with non-SNMP specifications. This is
consistent with the IESG decision to not require the SNMP terminology consistent with the IESG decision to not require that the SNMP
be modified to match the usage of other non-SNMP specifications when terminology be modified to match the usage of other non-SNMP
SNMP was advanced to a Full Standard. "Authentication" in this specifications when SNMP was advanced to an Internet Standard.
document typically refers to the English meaning of "serving to prove "Authentication" in this document typically refers to the English
the authenticity of" the message, not data source authentication or meaning of "serving to prove the authenticity of" the message, not
peer identity authentication. The terms "manager" and "agent" are data source authentication or peer identity authentication. The
not used in this document because, in the RFC3411 architecture, all terms "manager" and "agent" are not used in this document because, in
SNMP entities have the capability of acting as manager, agent, or the architecture defined in RFC 3411 [STD62], all SNMP entities have
both depending on the SNMP application types supported in the the capability of acting as manager, agent, or both, depending on the
implementation. Where distinction is necessary, the application SNMP application types supported in the implementation. Where
names of command generator, command responder, notification distinction is necessary, the application names of command generator,
originator, notification receiver, and proxy forwarder are used. See command responder, notification originator, notification receiver,
"SNMP Applications" (RFC3411) for further information. and proxy forwarder are used. See "An Architecture for Describing
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks" (RFC
3411 [STD62]) for further information.
Throughout this document, the terms "client" and "server" are used to Throughout this document, the terms "client" and "server" are used to
refer to the two ends of the TLS transport connection. The client refer to the two ends of the TLS transport connection. The client
actively opens the TLS connection, and the server passively listens actively opens the TLS connection, and the server passively listens
for the incoming TLS connection. An SNMP entity MAY act as a TLS for the incoming TLS connection. An SNMP entity MAY act as a TLS
client or server or both, depending on the SNMP applications client, TLS server, or both, depending on the SNMP applications
supported. supported.
Throughout this document, the term "session" is used to refer to a Throughout this document, the term "session" is used to refer to a
secure association between two instances of the TLS Transport Model secure association between two instances of the TLS Transport Model
(TLSTM) that permits the transmission of one or more SNMP messages (TLSTM) that permits the transmission of one or more SNMP messages
within the lifetime of the session. The TLS protocol also has an within the lifetime of the session. The TLS protocol also has an
internal notion of a session and although these two concepts of a internal notion of a session, and although these two concepts of a
session are related, when the term "session" is used this document is session are related, when the term "session" is used, this document
referring to the TLSTM's specific session and not directly to the TLS is referring to the TLSTM's specific session and not directly to the
protocol's session. TLS protocol's session.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here. capitals, as shown here.
2. Changes from RFC 6353 2. Changes from RFC 6353
This document updates [RFC6353]. The changes from [RFC6353] are This document updates [RFC6353]. The changes from [RFC6353] are
defined in the following clauses. defined in the following subsections.
2.1. TLSTM Fingerprint 2.1. TLSTM Fingerprint
[RFC6353] defines a fingerprint algorithm that references the one- [RFC6353] defines the SnmpTLSFingerprint textual convention to
octet TLS 1.2 hash algorithm identifier. TLS 1.3 replaced the one- include the one-octet TLS 1.2 hash algorithm identifier. This one-
octet hash algorithm identifier with a two-octet TLS 1.3 cipher suite octet algorithm identifier is only applicable to (D)TLS protocol
identifier. The TLS community does not plan to ever add additional versions prior to 1.3. The TLS community does not plan to ever add
values to the TLS 1.2 hash algorithm registry because some might additional values to the "TLS HashAlgorithm" registry [RFC5246],
incorrectly infer that using a new hash algorithm with TLS 1.2 would because some might incorrectly infer that using a new hash algorithm
overcome the limitations of TLS 1.2. However, there is still a need with TLS 1.2 would overcome the limitations of TLS 1.2. However,
within TLSTM to support new values as they are developed. there is still a need within TLSTM to support new values as they are
developed.
This document updates the definition of SnmpTLSFingerprint to clarify This document updates the definition of SnmpTLSFingerprint to clarify
that the one-octet identifier in the fingerprint algorithm uses the that the one-octet algorithm identifier uses the values in the IANA
IANA SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithm Registry; this registry is consistent "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms" registry; this registry is consistent
with the IANA TLS HashAlgorithm Registry for its initial values but with the IANA "TLS HashAlgorithm" registry for its initial values but
can be extended as needed to support new hashing algorithms without can be extended as needed to support new hashing algorithms without
implying that the new values can be used by TLS version 1.2. This implying that the new values can be used by TLS version 1.2. This
change allows the reuse of the existing fingerprint TEXTUAL- change allows the reuse of the existing fingerprint textual
CONVENTION and minimizes the impact to [RFC6353]. convention and minimizes the impact to [RFC6353].
A "Y" in the "Recommended" column indicates that the registered value A "Y" in the "Recommended" column (Table 1) indicates that the
has been recommended through a formal Standards Action. Not all registered value has been recommended through a formal Standards
parameters defined in Standards Track documents are necessarily Action [RFC8126]. Not all parameters defined in Standards Track
marked as "Recommended". documents are necessarily marked as "Recommended".
An "N" in the "Recommended" column does not necessarily mean that it An "N" in the "Recommended" column does not necessarily mean that the
is flawed; rather, it indicates that the item either has not been value is flawed; rather, it indicates that the item either has not
through the IETF consensus process, has limited applicability, or is been through the IETF consensus process, has limited applicability,
intended only for specific use cases. or is intended only for specific use cases.
The initial values for the SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithm Registry are The initial values for the "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms" registry are
defined below: defined below:
+=========+=============+=============+===========+ +=========+==========================+=============+============+
| Value | Description | Recommended | Reference | | Value | Description | Recommended | References |
+=========+=============+=============+===========+ +=========+==========================+=============+============+
| 0 | none | N | [RFC5246] | | 0 | none | N | [RFC5246] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 1 | md5 | N | [RFC5246] | | 1 | md5 | N | [RFC5246] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 2 | sha1 | N | [RFC5246] | | 2 | sha1 | N | [RFC5246] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 3 | sha224 | Y | [RFC5246] | | 3 | sha224 | Y | [RFC5246] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 4 | sha256 | Y | [RFC5246] | | 4 | sha256 | Y | [RFC5246] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 5 | sha384 | Y | [RFC5246] | | 5 | sha384 | Y | [RFC5246] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 6 | sha512 | Y | [RFC5246] | | 6 | sha512 | Y | [RFC5246] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 7 | reserved | | [RFC8447] | | 7 | Reserved | | [RFC8447] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 8 | intrinsic | N | [RFC8422] | | 8 | Intrinsic | N | [RFC8422] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 9-223 | reserved | | [RFC8447] | | 9-223 | Unassigned | | |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 224-255 | private | | [RFC5246] | | 224-255 | Reserved for Private Use | | [RFC5246] |
+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+ +---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
Table 1: SNMP-TLSTM Hash Algorithms Table 1: SNMP-TLSTM Hash Algorithms
Values 0 through 2 MUST NOT be used by implementations of this Values 0 through 2 MUST NOT be used by implementations of this
document but are listed for historical consistency. document but are listed for historical consistency.
2.2. Security Level 2.2. Security Level
The RFC3411 architecture recognizes three levels of security: The architecture defined in RFC 3411 [STD62] recognizes three levels
of security:
* without authentication and without privacy (noAuthNoPriv) * without authentication and without privacy (noAuthNoPriv)
* with authentication but without privacy (authNoPriv) * with authentication but without privacy (authNoPriv)
* with authentication and with privacy (authPriv) * with authentication and with privacy (authPriv)
Cipher suites for (D)TLS 1.3 defined in [RFC8446] provide both Cipher suites for (D)TLS 1.3 defined in [RFC8446] provide both
authentication and privacy. Cipher suites defined in [RFC9150] for authentication and privacy. Cipher suites defined in [RFC9150] for
(D)TLS 1.3 provide only authentication, without any privacy (D)TLS 1.3 provide only authentication, without any privacy
protection. Implementations MAY choose to force (D)TLS 1.3 to only protection. Implementations MAY choose to force (D)TLS 1.3 to only
allow cipher suites that provide both authentication and privacy. allow cipher suites that provide both authentication and privacy.
2.3. (D)TLS Version 2.3. (D)TLS Version
[RFC6353] states that TLSTM clients and servers MUST NOT request, [RFC6353] states that TLSTM clients and servers MUST NOT request,
offer, or use SSL 2.0. [RFC8996] prohibits the use of (D)TLS offer, or use SSL 2.0. [RFC8996] prohibits the use of (D)TLS
versions prior to version 1.2. TLSTM MUST only be used with (D)TLS versions prior to version 1.2. TLSTM MUST only be used with (D)TLS
version 1.2 and later. versions 1.2 and later.
3. Additional Rules for TLS 1.3 3. Additional Rules for TLS 1.3
This document specifies additional rules and clarifications for the This document specifies additional rules and clarifications for the
use of TLS 1.3. These rules may additionally apply to future use of TLS 1.3. These rules may additionally apply to future
versions of TLS. versions of TLS.
3.1. Zero Round Trip Time Resumption (0-RTT) 3.1. Zero Round-Trip Time Resumption (0-RTT)
TLS 1.3 implementations for SNMP MUST NOT enable the 0-RTT mode of TLS 1.3 implementations for SNMP MUST NOT enable the 0-RTT mode of
session resumption (either sending or accepting) and MUST NOT session resumption (either sending or accepting) and MUST NOT
automatically resend 0-RTT data if it is rejected by the server. The automatically resend 0-RTT data if it is rejected by the server.
reason 0-RTT is disallowed is that there are no "safe" SNMP messages 0-RTT is disallowed because there are no "safe" SNMP messages that,
that if replayed will be guaranteed to cause no harm at a server if replayed, will be guaranteed to cause no harm at the server side:
side: all incoming notification or command responses are meant to be all incoming notifications or command responses are meant to be acted
acted upon only once. See Security considerations section for upon only once. See Section 5 ("Security Considerations") for
further details. further details.
TLS TM clients and servers MUST NOT request, offer, or use the 0-RTT TLSTM clients and servers MUST NOT request, offer, or use the 0-RTT
mode of TLS 1.3. [RFC8446] removed the renegotiation supported in mode of TLS 1.3. [RFC8446] removed the renegotiation supported in
TLS 1.2 [RFC5246]; for session resumption, it introduced a zero-RTT TLS 1.2 [RFC5246]; for session resumption, it introduced a zero-RTT
(0-RTT) mode, saving a round-trip at connection setup at the cost of (0-RTT) mode, saving a round trip at connection setup at the cost of
increased risk of replay attacks (it is possible for servers to guard increased risk of replay attacks (it is possible for servers to guard
against this attack by keeping track of all the messages received). against this attack by keeping track of all the messages received).
[RFC8446] requires a profile be written for any application that [RFC8446] requires that a profile be written for any application that
wants to use 0-RTT, specifying which messages are "safe to use" on wants to use 0-RTT, specifying which messages are "safe to use" with
this mode. Within SNMP, there are no messages that are "safe to use" this mode. Within SNMP, there are no messages that are "safe to use"
with this mode. with this mode.
Renegotiation of sessions is not supported as it is not supported by Renegotiation of sessions is not supported, as it is not supported by
TLS 1.3. If a future version of TLS supports renegotiation, this RFC TLS 1.3. If a future version of TLS supports renegotiation, this RFC
should be updated to indicate whether there are any additional should be updated to indicate whether there are any additional
requirements related to its use. requirements related to its use.
3.2. TLS cipher suites, extensions and protocol invariants 3.2. TLS Cipher Suites, Extensions, and Protocol Invariants
[RFC8446] section 9 requires that, in the absence of application Section 9 of [RFC8446] requires that, in the absence of application
profiles, certain cipher suites, TLS extensions, and TLS protocol profiles, certain cipher suites, TLS extensions, and TLS protocol
invariants are mandatory to implement. This document does not invariants be mandatory to implement. This document does not specify
specify an application profile, hence all the compliance requirements an application profile; hence, all the compliance requirements in
in [RFC8446] apply. [RFC8446] apply.
4. MIB Module Definition 4. MIB Module Definitions
This module makes references to [RFC1123], RFC2578, RFC2579, RFC2580, This SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB module imports items from RFCs 2578, 2579, and
RFC3411, RFC3413, [RFC5246], [RFC5280], [RFC5890], [RFC5952], 2580 [STD58], as well as RFCs 3411 and 3413 [STD62]. It also
[RFC5953], [RFC6353], and [STD58] references [RFC1123], [RFC5246], [RFC5280], [RFC5591], [RFC5890],
[RFC5952], [RFC5953], [RFC6353], and RFC 2579 [STD58].
<CODE BEGINS> file "SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB"
SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
OBJECT-IDENTITY, mib-2, snmpDomains, OBJECT-IDENTITY, mib-2, snmpDomains,
Counter32, Unsigned32, Gauge32, NOTIFICATION-TYPE Counter32, Unsigned32, Gauge32, NOTIFICATION-TYPE
FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- RFC 2578 or any update thereof FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- RFC 2578 or any update thereof
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, TimeStamp, RowStatus, StorageType, TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, TimeStamp, RowStatus, StorageType,
AutonomousType AutonomousType
FROM SNMPv2-TC -- RFC 2579 or any update thereof FROM SNMPv2-TC -- RFC 2579 or any update thereof
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF -- RFC 2580 or any update thereof FROM SNMPv2-CONF -- RFC 2580 or any update thereof
SnmpAdminString SnmpAdminString
FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB -- RFC 3411 or any update thereof FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB -- RFC 3411 or any update thereof
snmpTargetParamsName, snmpTargetAddrName snmpTargetParamsName, snmpTargetAddrName
FROM SNMP-TARGET-MIB -- RFC 3413 or any update thereof FROM SNMP-TARGET-MIB -- RFC 3413 or any update thereof
; ;
snmpTlstmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY snmpTlstmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "202303010000Z" LAST-UPDATED "202311020000Z"
ORGANIZATION "OPSA Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO "WG-EMail: opsawg@ietf.org
Mailing list subscription info:
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Kenneth Vaughn ORGANIZATION "Operations and Management Area Working Group
Trevilon LLC <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>"
1060 Hwy 107 South CONTACT-INFO
Del Rio, TN 37727 "Author: Kenneth Vaughn
United States <mailto:kvaughn@trevilon.com>"
Phone: +1 571 331 5670 DESCRIPTION
Email: kvaughn@trevilon.com" "This is the MIB module for the TLS Transport Model
DESCRIPTION " (TLSTM).
The TLS Transport Model MIB
Copyright (c) 2010-2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified
as authors of the code. All rights reserved. as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or Redistribution and use in source and binary forms,
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject with or without modification, is permitted pursuant
to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License to, and subject to the license terms contained in,
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c
Relating to IETF Documents of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', 'SHALL The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', 'NOT 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document are to 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119) (RFC 8174) are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown (RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
here." capitals, as shown here."
REVISION "202303010000Z" REVISION "202311020000Z"
DESCRIPTION "This version of this MIB module is part of DESCRIPTION
RFC XXXX; see the RFC itself for full legal "This version of this MIB module is part of
notices. This version: [ Note to RFC Editor: RFC 9456; see the RFC itself for full legal
please replace the above XXXX with the RFC number notices. This version does the following:
of this document ]
1. Updates the definition of SnmpTLSFingerprint 1) Updates the definition of SnmpTLSFingerprint
to clarify the registry used for the one-octet to clarify the registry used for the one-octet
hash algorithm identifier. hash algorithm identifier.
2. Capitalizes key words in conformance with
BCP 14 2) Capitalizes key words in conformance with
3. Replaces 'may not' with 'MUST NOT' to clarify BCP 14.
intent in several locations.
4. Replaces 'may not' with a clarification within 3) Replaces 'may not' with 'MUST NOT' to clarify
the definition of SnmpTLSAddress" intent in several locations.
4) Replaces 'may not' with a clarification within
the definition of SnmpTLSAddress.
5) Applies cosmetic grammar improvements and
reformatting causing whitespace changes."
REVISION "201107190000Z" REVISION "201107190000Z"
DESCRIPTION "This version of this MIB module is part of DESCRIPTION
RFC 6353; see the RFC itself for full legal "This version of this MIB module is part of
notices. The only change was to introduce RFC 6353; see the RFC itself for full legal
new wording to reflect require changes for notices. The only change was to introduce
IDNA addresses in the SnmpTLSAddress TC." new wording to reflect required changes for
Internationalized Domain Names for Applications
(IDNA) addresses in the SnmpTLSAddress textual
convention (TC)."
REVISION "201005070000Z" REVISION "201005070000Z"
DESCRIPTION "This version of this MIB module is part of DESCRIPTION
RFC 5953; see the RFC itself for full legal "This version of this MIB module is part of
notices." RFC 5953; see the RFC itself for full legal
notices."
::= { mib-2 198 } ::= { mib-2 198 }
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
-- subtrees of the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB -- subtrees of the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
snmpTlstmNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 0 } snmpTlstmNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 0 }
snmpTlstmIdentities OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 1 } snmpTlstmIdentities OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 1 }
snmpTlstmObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 2 } snmpTlstmObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 2 }
snmpTlstmConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 3 } snmpTlstmConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 3 }
snmpTlstmHashAlgorithms OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpTlstmHashAlgorithms OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A node used to register hashing algorithm identifiers recorded "A node used to register hashing algorithm identifiers
in the IANA SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithm Registry." recorded in the IANA 'SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms' registry."
::= { snmpTlstmMIB 4 } ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 4 }
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
-- snmpTlstmObjects - Objects -- snmpTlstmObjects - Objects
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
snmpTLSTCPDomain OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpTLSTCPDomain OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The SNMP over TLS via TCP transport domain. The "The OBJECT IDENTIFIER representing the TDomain for the
SNMP over TLS via TCP transport domain. The
corresponding transport address is of type SnmpTLSAddress. corresponding transport address is of type SnmpTLSAddress.
The securityName prefix to be associated with the The securityName prefix to be associated with the
snmpTLSTCPDomain is 'tls'. This prefix MAY be used by snmpTLSTCPDomain is 'tls'. This prefix MAY be used by
security models or other components to identify which secure security models or other components to identify which secure
transport infrastructure authenticated a securityName." transport infrastructure authenticated a securityName."
REFERENCE REFERENCE
"RFC 2579: Textual Conventions for SMIv2" "TDomain, as defined in RFC 2579: Textual Conventions
for SMIv2"
::= { snmpDomains 8 } ::= { snmpDomains 8 }
snmpDTLSUDPDomain OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpDTLSUDPDomain OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The SNMP over DTLS via UDP transport domain. The "The OBJECT IDENTIFIER representing the TDomain for the
SNMP over DTLS via UDP transport domain. The
corresponding transport address is of type SnmpTLSAddress. corresponding transport address is of type SnmpTLSAddress.
The securityName prefix to be associated with the The securityName prefix to be associated with the
snmpDTLSUDPDomain is 'dtls'. This prefix MAY be used by snmpDTLSUDPDomain is 'dtls'. This prefix MAY be used by
security models or other components to identify which secure security models or other components to identify which secure
transport infrastructure authenticated a securityName." transport infrastructure authenticated a securityName."
REFERENCE REFERENCE
"RFC 2579: Textual Conventions for SMIv2" "TDomain, as defined in RFC 2579: Textual Conventions
for SMIv2"
::= { snmpDomains 9 } ::= { snmpDomains 9 }
SnmpTLSAddress ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION SnmpTLSAddress ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "1a" DISPLAY-HINT "1a"
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Represents an IPv4 address, an IPv6 address, or a "Represents an IPv4 address, an IPv6 address, or an
US-ASCII-encoded hostname and port number. ASCII-encoded host name and port number.
An IPv4 address MUST be in dotted decimal format followed by An IPv4 address MUST be in dotted decimal format followed
a colon ':' (US-ASCII character 0x3A) and a decimal port by a colon ':' (ASCII character 0x3A) and a decimal
number in US-ASCII. port number in ASCII.
An IPv6 address MUST be a colon-separated format (as An IPv6 address MUST be a colon-separated format (as
described in RFC 5952), surrounded by square brackets ('[', described in RFC 5952), surrounded by square brackets
US-ASCII character 0x5B, and ']', US-ASCII character 0x5D), ('[', ASCII character 0x5B, and ']', ASCII character
followed by a colon ':' (US-ASCII character 0x3A) and a 0x5D), followed by a colon ':' (ASCII character 0x3A)
decimal port number in US-ASCII. and a decimal port number in ASCII.
A hostname MUST be in US-ASCII (as per RFC 1123); A host name MUST be in ASCII (as per RFC 1123);
internationalized hostnames MUST be encoded as A-labels as internationalized host names MUST be encoded as A-labels as
specified in RFC 5890. The hostname is followed by a specified in RFC 5890. The host name is followed by a
colon ':' (US-ASCII character 0x3A) and a decimal port number colon ':' (ASCII character 0x3A) and a decimal port
in US-ASCII. The name SHOULD be fully qualified whenever number in ASCII. The name SHOULD be fully qualified
possible. whenever possible.
Values of this textual convention are not guaranteed to be Values of this textual convention are not guaranteed to be
directly usable as transport layer addressing information, directly usable as transport-layer addressing information,
potentially requiring additional processing, such as run-time potentially requiring additional processing, such as
resolution. As such, applications that write them MUST be run-time resolution. As such, applications that write
prepared for handling errors if such values are not them MUST be prepared for handling errors if such values
supported, or cannot be resolved (if resolution occurs at the are not supported or cannot be resolved (if resolution
time of the management operation). occurs at the time of the management operation).
The DESCRIPTION clause of TransportAddress objects that may The DESCRIPTION clause of TransportAddress objects that
have SnmpTLSAddress values MUST fully describe how (and may have SnmpTLSAddress values MUST fully describe how
when) such names are to be resolved to IP addresses and vice (and when) such names are to be resolved to IP addresses
versa. and vice versa.
This textual convention SHOULD NOT be used directly in object This textual convention SHOULD NOT be used directly in
definitions since it restricts addresses to a specific object definitions, since it restricts addresses to a
format. However, if it is used, it MAY be used either on its specific format. However, if it is used, it MAY be used
own or in conjunction with TransportAddressType or either on its own or in conjunction with
TransportDomain as a pair. TransportAddressType or TransportDomain as a pair.
When this textual convention is used as a syntax of an index When this textual convention is used as a syntax of an
object, there may be issues with the limit of 128 index object, there may be issues with the limit of 128
sub-identifiers specified in SMIv2 (STD 58). It is sub-identifiers specified in SMIv2 (STD 58). It is
RECOMMENDED that all MIB documents using this textual RECOMMENDED that all MIB documents using this textual
convention make explicit any limitations on index component convention make explicit any limitations on index
lengths that management software MUST observe. This MAY be component lengths that management software MUST observe.
done either by including SIZE constraints on the index This MAY be done by either 1) including SIZE constraints
components or by specifying applicable constraints in the on the index components or 2) specifying applicable
conceptual row DESCRIPTION clause or in the surrounding constraints in the conceptual row's DESCRIPTION clause or
documentation." in the surrounding documentation."
REFERENCE REFERENCE
"RFC 1123: Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application and "RFC 1123: Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application and
Support Support
RFC 5890: Internationalized Domain Names for Applications RFC 5890: Internationalized Domain Names for Applications
(IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework
RFC 5952: A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text RFC 5952: A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text
Representation" Representation"
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..255)) SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..255))
SnmpTLSFingerprint ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION SnmpTLSFingerprint ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "1x:1x" DISPLAY-HINT "1x:1x"
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A fingerprint value that can be used to uniquely reference "A fingerprint value that can be used to uniquely reference
other data of potentially arbitrary length. other data of potentially arbitrary length.
An SnmpTLSFingerprint value is composed of a 1-octet hashing An SnmpTLSFingerprint value is composed of a one-octet
algorithm identifier followed by the fingerprint value. The hashing algorithm identifier followed by the fingerprint
1-octet identifier value encoded is taken from IANA SNMP-TLSTM value. The one-octet identifier value encoded is taken
HashAlgorithm Registry. The remaining octets of the from the IANA 'SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms' registry. The
SnmpTLSFingerprint value are filled using the results of the remaining octets of the SnmpTLSFingerprint value are
hashing algorithm. filled using the results of the hashing algorithm.
Historically, the 1-octet hashing algorithm identifier was Historically, the one-octet hashing algorithm identifier
based on the IANA TLS HashAlgorithm Registry (RFC 5246); was based on the IANA 'TLS HashAlgorithm' registry
however, this registry is no longer in use for TLS 1.3 (RFC 5246); however, this registry is no longer in use for
and above and are not expected to have any new registrations TLS 1.3 and above and is not expected to have any new
added to it. To registrations added to it. To allow the fingerprint
allow the fingerprint algorithm to support additional hashing algorithm to support additional hashing algorithms that
algorithms that might be used by later versions of (D)TLS, the might be used by later versions of (D)TLS, the octet value
octet value encoded is now taken from IANA SNMP-TLSTM encoded is now taken from the IANA
HashAlgorithm Registry. The initial values within this 'SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms' registry. The initial values
registry are identical to the values in the TLS HashAlgorithm within this registry are identical to the values in the
registry but can be extended to support new hashing algorithms 'TLS HashAlgorithm' registry but can be extended to
as needed. support new hashing algorithms as needed.
This TEXTUAL-CONVENTION allows for a zero-length (blank) This textual convention allows for a zero-length (blank)
SnmpTLSFingerprint value for use in tables where the SnmpTLSFingerprint value for use in tables where the
fingerprint value MAY be optional. MIB definitions or fingerprint value MAY be optional. MIB definitions or
implementations MAY refuse to accept a zero-length value as implementations MAY refuse to accept a zero-length value
appropriate." as appropriate."
REFERENCE "https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/ REFERENCE
smi-numbers.xhtml" "RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.2
https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/"
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255)) SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))
-- Identities for use in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable -- Identities for use in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities OBJECT IDENTIFIER snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
::= { snmpTlstmIdentities 1 } { snmpTlstmIdentities 1 }
snmpTlstmCertSpecified OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpTlstmCertSpecified OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Directly specifies the tmSecurityName to be used for this "Directly specifies the tmSecurityName to be used for this
certificate. The value of the tmSecurityName to use is certificate. The value of the tmSecurityName to use is
specified in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNData column. The specified in the 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNData' column. The
snmpTlstmCertToTSNData column MUST contain a non-zero length 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNData' column MUST contain a
SnmpAdminString compliant value or the mapping described in non-zero-length SnmpAdminString-compliant value, or the
this row MUST be considered a failure." mapping described in this row MUST be considered a
failure."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 1 }
snmpTlstmCertSANRFC822Name OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpTlstmCertSANRFC822Name OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Maps a subjectAltName's rfc822Name to a tmSecurityName. The "Maps a subjectAltName's rfc822Name to a tmSecurityName.
local part of the rfc822Name is passed unaltered but the The local-part of the rfc822Name is passed unaltered, but
host-part of the name MUST be passed in lowercase. This the domain of the name MUST be passed in lowercase.
mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between equivalent This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between
subjectAltName rfc822Name values and tmSecurityName values equivalent subjectAltName rfc822Name values and
except that the host-part of the name MUST be passed in tmSecurityName values, except that the domain of the
lowercase. name MUST be passed in lowercase.
Example rfc822Name Field: FooBar@Example.COM is mapped to Example rfc822Name field: FooBar@Example.COM is mapped to
tmSecurityName: FooBar@example.com." tmSecurityName: FooBar@example.com."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 2 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 2 }
snmpTlstmCertSANDNSName OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpTlstmCertSANDNSName OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Maps a subjectAltName's dNSName to a tmSecurityName after "Maps a subjectAltName's dNSName to a tmSecurityName after
first converting it to all lowercase (RFC 5280 does not first converting it to all lowercase (RFC 5280 does not
specify converting to lowercase, so this involves an extra specify converting to lowercase, so this involves an extra
step). This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between step). This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence
subjectAltName dNSName values and the tmSecurityName values." between subjectAltName dNSName values and the
REFERENCE "RFC 5280 - Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure tmSecurityName values."
Certificate and Certificate Revocation List REFERENCE
(CRL) Profile." "RFC 5280: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Certificate and Certificate Revocation
List (CRL) Profile"
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 3 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 3 }
snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Maps a subjectAltName's iPAddress to a tmSecurityName by "Maps a subjectAltName's iPAddress to a tmSecurityName by
transforming the binary encoded address as follows: transforming the binary-encoded address as follows:
1) for IPv4, the value is converted into a decimal-dotted quad 1) For IPv4, the value is converted into a
address (e.g., '192.0.2.1'). decimal-dotted quad address (e.g., '192.0.2.1').
2) for IPv6 addresses, the value is converted into a 32- 2) For IPv6 addresses, the value is converted into a
character all lowercase hexadecimal string without any colon 32-character all-lowercase hexadecimal string
separators. without any colon separators.
This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between
subjectAltName iPAddress values and the tmSecurityName values. subjectAltName iPAddress values and the tmSecurityName
values.
The resulting length of an encoded IPv6 address is the maximum The resulting length of an encoded IPv6 address is the
length supported by the View-Based Access Control Model maximum length supported by the View-based Access Control
(VACM). Using both the Transport Security Model's support for Model (VACM). Using an IPv6 address while the value of
transport prefixes (see the SNMP-TSM-MIB's snmpTsmConfigurationUsePrefix is 'true' (see the
snmpTsmConfigurationUsePrefix object for details) will result SNMP-TSM-MIB, as defined in RFC 5591) will result in
in securityName lengths that exceed what VACM can handle." securityName lengths that exceed what the VACM can handle."
REFERENCE
"RFC 5591: Transport Security Model for the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP)"
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 4 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 4 }
snmpTlstmCertSANAny OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpTlstmCertSANAny OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Maps any of the following fields using the corresponding "Maps any of the following fields using the corresponding
mapping algorithms: mapping algorithms:
|------------+----------------------------| |------------+----------------------------|
| Type | Algorithm | | Type | Algorithm |
|------------+----------------------------| |------------+----------------------------|
| rfc822Name | snmpTlstmCertSANRFC822Name | | rfc822Name | snmpTlstmCertSANRFC822Name |
| dNSName | snmpTlstmCertSANDNSName | | dNSName | snmpTlstmCertSANDNSName |
| iPAddress | snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress | | iPAddress | snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress |
|------------+----------------------------| |------------+----------------------------|
The first matching subjectAltName value found in the The first subjectAltName value contained in the certificate
certificate of the above types MUST be used when deriving the that matches any of the above types MUST be used when
tmSecurityName. The mapping algorithm specified in the deriving the tmSecurityName. The mapping algorithm
'Algorithm' column MUST be used to derive the tmSecurityName. specified in the 'Algorithm' column of the corresponding
row MUST be used to derive the tmSecurityName.
This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between
subjectAltName values and tmSecurityName values. The three subjectAltName values and tmSecurityName values. The
sub-mapping algorithms produced by this combined algorithm three sub-mapping algorithms produced by this combined
cannot produce conflicting results between themselves." algorithm cannot produce conflicting results between
themselves."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 5 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 5 }
snmpTlstmCertCommonName OBJECT-IDENTITY snmpTlstmCertCommonName OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Maps a certificate's CommonName to a tmSecurityName after "Maps a certificate's CommonName to a tmSecurityName after
converting it to a UTF-8 encoding. The usage of CommonNames converting it to a UTF-8 encoding. The usage of
is deprecated and users are encouraged to use subjectAltName CommonNames is deprecated, and users are encouraged to use
mapping methods instead. This mapping results in a 1:1 subjectAltName mapping methods instead. This mapping
correspondence between certificate CommonName values and results in a 1:1 correspondence between certificate
tmSecurityName values." CommonName values and tmSecurityName values."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 6 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 6 }
-- The snmpTlstmSession Group -- The snmpTlstmSession Group
snmpTlstmSession OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmObjects 1 } snmpTlstmSession OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmObjects 1 }
snmpTlstmSessionOpens OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionOpens OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an openSession() request has been "The number of times an openSession() request has been
executed as a (D)TLS client, regardless of whether it executed as a (D)TLS client, regardless of whether it
succeeded or failed." succeeded or failed."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 1 }
snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times a closeSession() request has been "The number of times a closeSession() request has been
executed as a (D)TLS client, regardless of whether it executed as a (D)TLS client, regardless of whether it
succeeded or failed." succeeded or failed."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 2 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 2 }
snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an openSession() request failed to open "The number of times an openSession() request failed to
a session as a (D)TLS client, for any reason." open a session as a (D)TLS client, for any reason."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 3 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 3 }
snmpTlstmSessionAccepts OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionAccepts OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times a (D)TLS server has accepted a new "The number of times a (D)TLS server has accepted a new
connection from a client and has received at least one SNMP connection from a client and has received at least one
message through it." SNMP message through it."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 4 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 4 }
snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times a closeSession() request has been "The number of times a closeSession() request has been
executed as a (D)TLS server, regardless of whether it executed as a (D)TLS server, regardless of whether it
succeeded or failed." succeeded or failed."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 5 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 5 }
snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an outgoing message was dropped because "The number of times an outgoing message was dropped
the session associated with the passed tmStateReference was because the session associated with the passed
no longer (or was never) available." tmStateReference was no longer (or never) available."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 6 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 6 }
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an incoming session was not established "The number of times an incoming session was not
on a (D)TLS server because the presented client certificate established on a (D)TLS server because the presented
was invalid. Reasons for invalidation include, but are not client certificate was invalid. Reasons for invalidation
limited to, cryptographic validation failures or lack of a include, but are not limited to, cryptographic validation
suitable mapping row in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable." failures or lack of a suitable mapping row in the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 7 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 7 }
snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an outgoing session was not established "The number of times an outgoing session was not
on a (D)TLS client because the server certificate presented established on a (D)TLS client because the server
by an SNMP over (D)TLS server was invalid because no certificate presented by an SNMP over (D)TLS server was
configured fingerprint or Certification Authority (CA) was invalid because no configured fingerprint or Certification
acceptable to validate it. Authority (CA) was acceptable to validate it. This may
This may result because there was no entry in the result because there was no entry in the
snmpTlstmAddrTable or because no path could be found to a snmpTlstmAddrTable or because no path to a known CA could
known CA." be found."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 8 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 8 }
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an outgoing session was not established "The number of times an outgoing session was not
on a (D)TLS client because the server certificate presented established on a (D)TLS client because the server
by an SNMP over (D)TLS server could not be validated even if certificate presented by an SNMP over (D)TLS server could
the fingerprint or expected validation path was known. That not be validated even if the fingerprint or expected
is, a cryptographic validation error occurred during validation path was known. That is, a cryptographic
certificate validation processing. validation error occurred during certificate validation
processing.
Reasons for invalidation include, but are not Reasons for invalidation include, but are not limited to,
limited to, cryptographic validation failures." cryptographic validation failures."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 9 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 9 }
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32 SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The number of outgoing messages dropped because the "The number of outgoing messages dropped because the
tmStateReference referred to an invalid cache." tmStateReference referred to an invalid cache."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 10 } ::= { snmpTlstmSession 10 }
-- Configuration Objects -- Configuration Objects
snmpTlstmConfig OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmObjects 2 } snmpTlstmConfig OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmObjects 2 }
-- Certificate mapping -- Certificate mapping
snmpTlstmCertificateMapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {snmpTlstmConfig 1} snmpTlstmCertificateMapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ snmpTlstmConfig 1 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNCount OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNCount OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32 SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A count of the number of entries in the "A count of the number of entries in the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable." snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 1 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable "The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable
was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not been was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not
modified since the command responder was started." been modified since the command responder was started."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 2 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 2 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"This table is used by a (D)TLS server to map the (D)TLS "This table is used by a (D)TLS server to map the (D)TLS
client's presented X.509 certificate to a tmSecurityName. client's presented X.509 certificate to a tmSecurityName.
On an incoming (D)TLS/SNMP connection, the client's presented On an incoming (D)TLS/SNMP connection, the client's
certificate MUST either be validated based on an established presented certificate either MUST be validated based on an
trust anchor, or it MUST directly match a fingerprint in this established trust anchor or MUST directly match a
table. This table does not provide any mechanisms for fingerprint in this table. This table does not provide
configuring the trust anchors; the transfer of any needed any mechanisms for configuring the trust anchors; the
trusted certificates for path validation is expected to occur transfer of any needed trusted certificates for path
through an out-of-band transfer. validation is expected to occur through an out-of-band
transfer.
Once the certificate has been found acceptable (either by Once the certificate has been found acceptable (either via
path validation or directly matching a fingerprint in this path validation or by directly matching a fingerprint in
table), this table is consulted to determine the appropriate this table), this table is consulted to determine the
tmSecurityName to identify with the remote connection. This appropriate tmSecurityName to identify with the remote
is done by considering each active row from this table in connection. This is done by considering each active row
prioritized order according to its snmpTlstmCertToTSNID from this table in prioritized order according to its
value. Each row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value snmpTlstmCertToTSNID value. Each row's
determines whether the row is a match for the incoming snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value determines whether the
connection: row is a match for the incoming connection:
1) If the row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value 1) If the row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value
identifies the presented certificate, then consider identifies the presented certificate, then consider
the row as a successful match. the row as a successful match.
2) If the row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value 2) If the row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value
identifies a locally held copy of a trusted CA identifies a locally held copy of a trusted CA
certificate and that CA certificate was used to certificate and that CA certificate was used to
validate the path to the presented certificate, then validate the path to the presented certificate, then
consider the row as a successful match. consider the row as a successful match.
Once a matching row has been found, the Once a matching row has been found, the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType value can be used to determine how snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType value can be used to determine
the tmSecurityName to associate with the session should be how the tmSecurityName to associate with the session
determined. See the snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType column's should be determined. See the 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType'
DESCRIPTION for details on determining the tmSecurityName column's DESCRIPTION clause for details on determining the
value. If it is impossible to determine a tmSecurityName tmSecurityName value. If it is impossible to determine a
from the row's data combined with the data presented in the tmSecurityName from the row's data combined with the data
certificate, then additional rows MUST be searched looking presented in the certificate, then additional rows MUST be
for another potential match. If a resulting tmSecurityName searched to look for another potential match. If a
mapped from a given row is not compatible with the needed resulting tmSecurityName mapped from a given row is not
requirements of a tmSecurityName (e.g., VACM imposes a compatible with the needed requirements of a
32-octet-maximum length and the certificate derived tmSecurityName (e.g., the VACM imposes a 32-octet-maximum
securityName could be longer), then it MUST be considered an length and the certificate-derived securityName could be
invalid match and additional rows MUST be searched looking longer), then it MUST be considered an invalid match and
for another potential match. additional rows MUST be searched to look for another
potential match.
If no matching and valid row can be found, the connection If no matching and valid row can be found, the connection
MUST be closed and SNMP messages MUST NOT be accepted over MUST be closed and SNMP messages MUST NOT be accepted over
it. it.
Missing values of snmpTlstmCertToTSNID are acceptable and Missing values of snmpTlstmCertToTSNID are acceptable, and
implementations SHOULD continue to the next highest numbered implementations SHOULD continue to the
row. It is RECOMMENDED that administrators skip index values next-highest-numbered row. It is RECOMMENDED that
to leave room for the insertion of future rows (for example, administrators skip index values to leave room for the
use values of 10 and 20 when creating initial rows). insertion of future rows (for example, use values of 10
and 20 when creating initial rows).
Users are encouraged to make use of certificates with Users are encouraged to make use of certificates with
subjectAltName fields that can be used as tmSecurityNames so subjectAltName fields that can be used as tmSecurityNames.
that a single root CA certificate can allow all child This allows all child certificates of a single root CA
certificate's subjectAltName to map directly to a certificate to include a subjectAltName that maps directly
tmSecurityName via a 1:1 transformation. However, this table to a tmSecurityName via a 1:1 transformation. However,
is flexible to allow for situations where existing deployed this table is flexible, to allow for situations where
certificate infrastructures do not provide adequate existing deployed certificate infrastructures do not provide
subjectAltName values for use as tmSecurityNames. adequate subjectAltName values for use as tmSecurityNames.
Certificates MAY also be mapped to tmSecurityNames using the Certificates MAY also be mapped to tmSecurityNames using
CommonName portion of the Subject field. However, the usage the CommonName portion of the Subject field. However, the
of the CommonName field is deprecated and thus this usage is usage of the CommonName field is deprecated, and thus this
NOT RECOMMENDED. Direct mapping from each individual usage is NOT RECOMMENDED. Direct mapping from each
certificate fingerprint to a tmSecurityName is also possible individual certificate fingerprint to a tmSecurityName is
but requires one entry in the table per tmSecurityName and also possible but requires one entry in the table per
requires more management operations to completely configure a tmSecurityName and requires more management operations to
device." completely configure a device."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 3 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 3 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry SYNTAX SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A row in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable that specifies a "A row in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable that specifies a
mapping for an incoming (D)TLS certificate to a mapping for an incoming (D)TLS certificate to a
tmSecurityName to use for a connection." tmSecurityName to use for a connection."
INDEX { snmpTlstmCertToTSNID } INDEX { snmpTlstmCertToTSNID }
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable 1 }
SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry ::= SEQUENCE { SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
snmpTlstmCertToTSNID Unsigned32, snmpTlstmCertToTSNID Unsigned32,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint, snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType AutonomousType, snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType AutonomousType,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNData OCTET STRING, snmpTlstmCertToTSNData OCTET STRING,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType StorageType, snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType StorageType,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus RowStatus snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus RowStatus
} }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNID OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNID OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..4294967295) SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A unique, prioritized index for the given entry. Lower "A unique, prioritized index for the given entry. Lower
numbers indicate a higher priority." numbers indicate a higher priority."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 1 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint (SIZE(1..255)) SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint (SIZE (1..255))
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A cryptographic hash of an X.509 certificate. The results "A cryptographic hash of an X.509 certificate. The results
of a successful matching fingerprint to either the trusted CA of a successful matching fingerprint to either the trusted
in the certificate validation path or to the certificate CA in the certificate validation path or the certificate
itself is dictated by the snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType column." itself is dictated by the 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType'
column."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 2 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 2 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX AutonomousType SYNTAX AutonomousType
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Specifies the mapping type for deriving a tmSecurityName "Specifies the mapping type for deriving a tmSecurityName
from a certificate. Details for mapping of a particular type from a certificate. Details for mapping of a particular
SHALL be specified in the DESCRIPTION clause of the OBJECT- type SHALL be specified in the DESCRIPTION clause of the
IDENTITY that describes the mapping. If a mapping succeeds OBJECT-IDENTITY that describes the mapping. If a mapping
it will return a tmSecurityName for use by the TLSTM model succeeds, it will return a tmSecurityName for use by the
and processing stops. TLSTM and processing will stop.
If the resulting mapped value is not compatible with the If the resulting mapped value is not compatible with the
needed requirements of a tmSecurityName (e.g., VACM imposes a needed requirements of a tmSecurityName (e.g., the VACM
32-octet-maximum length and the certificate derived imposes a 32-octet-maximum length and the
securityName could be longer), then future rows MUST be certificate-derived securityName could be longer), then
searched for additional snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint matches future rows MUST be searched for additional
to look for a mapping that succeeds. snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint matches to look for a
mapping that succeeds.
Suitable values for assigning to this object that are defined Suitable values for assigning to this object that are
within the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB can be found in the defined within the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB can be found in the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities portion of the MIB tree." snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities portion of the MIB tree."
DEFVAL { snmpTlstmCertSpecified } DEFVAL { snmpTlstmCertSpecified }
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 3 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 3 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNData OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNData OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..1024)) SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..1024))
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Auxiliary data used as optional configuration information "Auxiliary data used as optional configuration information
for a given mapping specified by the for a given mapping specified by the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType column. Only some mapping 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType' column. Only some mapping
systems will make use of this column. The value in this systems will make use of this column. The value in this
column MUST be ignored for any mapping type that does not column MUST be ignored for any mapping type that does not
require data present in this column." require that data be present in this column."
DEFVAL { "" } DEFVAL { "" }
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 4 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 4 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX StorageType SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows "The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows
having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access to having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access
any columnar objects in the row." to any columnar objects in the row."
DEFVAL { nonVolatile } DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 5 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 5 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row. This object MAY be used "The status of this conceptual row. This object MAY be
to create or remove rows from this table. used to create or remove rows from this table.
To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set this To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set
object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5). this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).
Until instances of all corresponding columns are Until instances of all corresponding columns are
appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding
instance of the snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus column is instance of the 'snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus' column is
notReady(3). notReady(3).
In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active
until the corresponding snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint, until the corresponding 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint',
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType, and snmpTlstmCertToTSNData columns 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType', and 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNData'
have been set. columns have been set.
The following objects MUST NOT be modified while the The following objects MUST NOT be modified while the
value of this object is active(1): value of this object is active(1):
- snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint - snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint
- snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType - snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType
- snmpTlstmCertToTSNData - snmpTlstmCertToTSNData
An attempt to set these objects while the value of An attempt to set these objects while the value of
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in
an inconsistentValue error." an inconsistentValue error."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 6 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 6 }
-- Maps tmSecurityNames to certificates for use by the -- Maps tmSecurityNames to certificates for use by the
-- SNMP-TARGET-MIB -- SNMP-TARGET-MIB
snmpTlstmParamsCount OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmParamsCount OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32 SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A count of the number of entries in the "A count of the number of entries in the
snmpTlstmParamsTable." snmpTlstmParamsTable."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 4 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 4 }
snmpTlstmParamsTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmParamsTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmParamsTable "The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmParamsTable
was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not been was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not
modified since the command responder was started." been modified since the command responder was started."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 5 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 5 }
snmpTlstmParamsTable OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmParamsTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmParamsEntry SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmParamsEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"This table is used by a (D)TLS client when a (D)TLS "This table is used by a (D)TLS client when a (D)TLS
connection is being set up using an entry in the connection is being set up using an entry in the
SNMP-TARGET-MIB. It extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's SNMP-TARGET-MIB. It extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's
snmpTargetParamsTable with a fingerprint of a certificate to snmpTargetParamsTable with a fingerprint of a certificate
use when establishing such a (D)TLS connection." to use when establishing such a (D)TLS connection."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 6 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 6 }
snmpTlstmParamsEntry OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmParamsEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTlstmParamsEntry SYNTAX SnmpTlstmParamsEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A conceptual row containing a fingerprint hash of a locally "A conceptual row containing a fingerprint hash of a
held certificate for a given snmpTargetParamsEntry. The locally held certificate for a given
values in this row SHOULD be ignored if the connection that snmpTargetParamsEntry. The values in this row SHOULD be
needs to be established, as indicated by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB ignored if the connection that needs to be established, as
infrastructure, is not a certificate and (D)TLS based indicated by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB infrastructure, is not a
connection. The connection SHOULD NOT be established if the certificate-based and (D)TLS-based connection. The
certificate fingerprint stored in this entry does not point connection SHOULD NOT be established if the certificate
to a valid locally held certificate or if it points to an fingerprint stored in this entry does not point to a valid
unusable certificate (such as might happen when the locally held certificate or if it points to an unusable
certificate's expiration date has been reached)." certificate (such as might happen when the certificate's
expiration date has been reached)."
INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetParamsName } INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetParamsName }
::= { snmpTlstmParamsTable 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmParamsTable 1 }
SnmpTlstmParamsEntry ::= SEQUENCE { SnmpTlstmParamsEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint, snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint,
snmpTlstmParamsStorageType StorageType, snmpTlstmParamsStorageType StorageType,
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus RowStatus snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus RowStatus
} }
snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"This object stores the hash of the public portion of a "This object stores the hash of the public portion of a
locally held X.509 certificate. The X.509 certificate, its locally held X.509 certificate. The X.509 certificate,
public key, and the corresponding private key will be used its public key, and the corresponding private key will be
when initiating a (D)TLS connection as a (D)TLS client." used when initiating a (D)TLS connection as a (D)TLS
client."
::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 1 }
snmpTlstmParamsStorageType OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmParamsStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX StorageType SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows "The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows
having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access to having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access
any columnar objects in the row." to any columnar objects in the row."
DEFVAL { nonVolatile } DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 2 } ::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 2 }
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row. This object MAY be used "The status of this conceptual row. This object MAY be
to create or remove rows from this table. used to create or remove rows from this table.
To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set this To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set
object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5). this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).
Until instances of all corresponding columns are Until instances of all corresponding columns are
appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding
instance of the snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus column is instance of the 'snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus' column is
notReady(3). notReady(3).
In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active
until the corresponding snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint until the corresponding 'snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint'
column has been set. column has been set.
The snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint object MUST NOT be The snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint object MUST NOT be
modified while the value of this object is active(1). modified while the value of this object is active(1).
An attempt to set these objects while the value of An attempt to set these objects while the value of
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in
an inconsistentValue error." an inconsistentValue error."
::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 3 } ::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 3 }
snmpTlstmAddrCount OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmAddrCount OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32 SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A count of the number of entries in the snmpTlstmAddrTable." "A count of the number of entries in the
snmpTlstmAddrTable."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 7 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 7 }
snmpTlstmAddrTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmAddrTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmAddrTable "The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmAddrTable
was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not been was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not
modified since the command responder was started." been modified since the command responder was started."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 8 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 8 }
snmpTlstmAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmAddrEntry SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmAddrEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"This table is used by a (D)TLS client when a (D)TLS "This table is used by a (D)TLS client when a (D)TLS
connection is being set up using an entry in the connection is being set up using an entry in the
SNMP-TARGET-MIB. It extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's SNMP-TARGET-MIB. It extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's
snmpTargetAddrTable so that the client can verify that the snmpTargetAddrTable so that the client can verify that the
correct server has been reached. This verification can use correct server has been reached. This verification can
either a certificate fingerprint, or an identity use either 1) a certificate fingerprint or 2) an
authenticated via certification path validation. identity authenticated via certification path validation.
If there is an active row in this table corresponding to the If there is an active row in this table corresponding to
entry in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB that was used to establish the the entry in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB that was used to
connection, and the row's snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint establish the connection and the row's
column has non-empty value, then the server's presented 'snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint' column has a non-empty
certificate is compared with the value, then the server's presented certificate is compared
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint value (and the with the snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint value (and the
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity column is ignored). If the 'snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity' column is ignored). If the
fingerprint matches, the verification has succeeded. If the fingerprint matches, the verification has succeeded. If
fingerprint does not match, then the connection MUST be the fingerprint does not match, then the connection MUST
closed. be closed.
If the server's presented certificate has passed If the server's presented certificate has passed
certification path validation [RFC5280] to a configured certification path validation (RFC 5280) to a configured
trust anchor, and an active row exists with a zero-length trust anchor and an active row exists with a zero-length
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint value, then the snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint value, then the
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity column contains the expected 'snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity' column contains the expected
host name. This expected host name is then compared against host name. This expected host name is then compared
the server's certificate as follows: against the server's certificate as follows:
- Implementations MUST support matching the expected host - Implementations MUST support matching the expected
name against a dNSName in the subjectAltName extension host name against a dNSName in the subjectAltName
field and MAY support checking the name against the extension field and MAY support checking the name
CommonName portion of the subject distinguished name. against the CommonName portion of the subject
distinguished name.
- The '*' (ASCII 0x2a) wildcard character is allowed in the - The '*' (ASCII 0x2A) wildcard character is allowed in
dNSName of the subjectAltName extension (and in common the dNSName of the subjectAltName extension (and in
name, if used to store the host name), but only as the CommonName, if used to store the host name), but
left-most (least significant) DNS label in that value. only as the leftmost (least significant) DNS label
This wildcard matches any left-most DNS label in the in that value. This wildcard matches any leftmost
server name. That is, the subject *.example.com matches DNS label in the server name. That is, the subject
the server names a.example.com and b.example.com, but does *.example.com matches the server names a.example.com
not match example.com or a.b.example.com. Implementations and b.example.com but does not match example.com or
MUST support wildcards in certificates as specified above, a.b.example.com. Implementations MUST support
but MAY provide a configuration option to disable them. wildcards in certificates as specified above but MAY
provide a configuration option to disable them.
- If the locally configured name is an internationalized - If the locally configured name is an
domain name, conforming implementations MUST convert it to internationalized domain name, conforming
the ASCII Compatible Encoding (ACE) format for performing implementations MUST convert it to the ASCII
comparisons, as specified in Section 7 of [RFC5280]. Compatible Encoding (ACE) format for performing
comparisons, as specified in Section 7 of RFC 5280.
If the expected host name fails these conditions then the If the expected host name fails these conditions, then the
connection MUST be closed. connection MUST be closed.
If there is no row in this table corresponding to the entry If there is no row in this table corresponding to the
in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB and the server can be authorized by entry in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB and the server can be
another, implementation-dependent means, then the connection authorized by another, implementation-dependent means,
MAY still proceed." then the connection MAY still proceed."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 9 } ::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 9 }
snmpTlstmAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTlstmAddrEntry SYNTAX SnmpTlstmAddrEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A conceptual row containing a copy of a certificate's "A conceptual row containing a copy of a certificate's
fingerprint for a given snmpTargetAddrEntry. The values in fingerprint for a given snmpTargetAddrEntry. The values
this row SHOULD be ignored if the connection that needs to be in this row SHOULD be ignored if the connection that needs
established, as indicated by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB to be established, as indicated by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB
infrastructure, is not a (D)TLS based connection. If an infrastructure, is not a (D)TLS-based connection. If an
snmpTlstmAddrEntry exists for a given snmpTargetAddrEntry, snmpTlstmAddrEntry exists for a given snmpTargetAddrEntry,
then the presented server certificate MUST match or the then the presented server certificate MUST match or the
connection MUST NOT be established. If a row in this table connection MUST NOT be established. If a row in this
does not exist to match an snmpTargetAddrEntry row, then the table does not exist to match an snmpTargetAddrEntry row,
connection SHOULD still proceed if some other certificate then the connection SHOULD still proceed if some other
validation path algorithm (e.g., RFC 5280) can be used." certification path validation algorithm (e.g., RFC 5280)
can be used."
INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetAddrName } INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetAddrName }
::= { snmpTlstmAddrTable 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmAddrTable 1 }
SnmpTlstmAddrEntry ::= SEQUENCE { SnmpTlstmAddrEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint, snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint,
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity SnmpAdminString, snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity SnmpAdminString,
snmpTlstmAddrStorageType StorageType, snmpTlstmAddrStorageType StorageType,
snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus RowStatus snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus RowStatus
} }
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A cryptographic hash of a public X.509 certificate. This "A cryptographic hash of a public X.509 certificate. This
object should store the hash of the public X.509 certificate object should store the hash of the public X.509
that the remote server should present during the (D)TLS certificate that the remote server should present during
connection setup. The fingerprint of the presented the (D)TLS connection setup. The fingerprint of the
certificate and this hash value MUST match exactly, or the presented certificate and this hash value MUST match
connection MUST NOT be established." exactly, or the connection MUST NOT be established."
DEFVAL { "" } DEFVAL { "" }
::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 1 }
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpAdminString SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The reference identity to check against the identity "The reference identity to check against the identity
presented by the remote system." presented by the remote system."
DEFVAL { "" } DEFVAL { "" }
::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 2 } ::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 2 }
snmpTlstmAddrStorageType OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmAddrStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX StorageType SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows "The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows
having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access to having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access
any columnar objects in the row." to any columnar objects in the row."
DEFVAL { nonVolatile } DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 3 } ::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 3 }
snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row. This object may be used "The status of this conceptual row. This object may be
to create or remove rows from this table. used to create or remove rows from this table.
To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set this To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set
object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5). this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).
Until instances of all corresponding columns are Until instances of all corresponding columns are
appropriately configured, the value of the appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding
corresponding instance of the snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus instance of the 'snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus' column is
column is notReady(3). notReady(3).
In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active
until the corresponding snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint column until the corresponding 'snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint'
has been set. column has been set.
Rows MUST NOT be active if the snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint Rows MUST NOT be active if the
column is blank and the snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity is set to 'snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint' column is blank and the
'*' since this would insecurely accept any presented snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity is set to '*', since this
certificate. would insecurely accept any presented certificate.
The snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint object MUST NOT be The snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint object MUST NOT be
modified while the value of this object is active(1). modified while the value of this object is active(1).
An attempt to set these objects while the value of An attempt to set these objects while the value of
snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus is active(1) will result in snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus is active(1) will result in
an inconsistentValue error." an inconsistentValue error."
::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 4 } ::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 4 }
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
-- snmpTlstmNotifications - Notifications Information -- snmpTlstmNotifications - Notifications Information
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown NOTIFICATION-TYPE snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate } OBJECTS { snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate }
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Notification that the server certificate presented by an "Notification that the server certificate presented by an
SNMP over (D)TLS server was invalid because no configured SNMP over (D)TLS server was invalid because no configured
fingerprint or CA was acceptable to validate it. This may fingerprint or CA was acceptable to validate it. This may
be because there was no entry in the snmpTlstmAddrTable or be because there was no entry in the snmpTlstmAddrTable or
because no path could be found to known Certification because no path to a known CA could be found.
Authority.
To avoid notification loops, this notification MUST NOT be To avoid notification loops, this notification MUST NOT be
sent to servers that themselves have triggered the sent to servers that themselves have triggered the
notification." notification."
::= { snmpTlstmNotifications 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmNotifications 1 }
snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate NOTIFICATION-TYPE snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint, OBJECTS {
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates} snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint,
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates
}
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Notification that the server certificate presented by an "Notification that the server certificate presented by an
SNMP over (D)TLS server could not be validated even if the SNMP over (D)TLS server could not be validated even if the
fingerprint or expected validation path was known. That is, fingerprint or expected validation path was known.
a cryptographic validation error occurred during certificate That is, a cryptographic validation error occurred during
validation processing. certificate validation processing.
To avoid notification loops, this notification MUST NOT be To avoid notification loops, this notification MUST NOT be
sent to servers that themselves have triggered the sent to servers that themselves have triggered the
notification." notification."
::= { snmpTlstmNotifications 2 } ::= { snmpTlstmNotifications 2 }
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
-- snmpTlstmCompliances - Conformance Information -- snmpTlstmCompliances - Conformance Information
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
skipping to change at page 28, line 10 skipping to change at line 1334
snmpTlstmGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmConformance 2 } snmpTlstmGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmConformance 2 }
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
-- Compliance statements -- Compliance statements
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
snmpTlstmCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE snmpTlstmCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for SNMP engines that support the "The compliance statement for SNMP engines that support the
SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB" SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB."
MODULE MODULE
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTlstmStatsGroup, MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTlstmStatsGroup,
snmpTlstmIncomingGroup, snmpTlstmIncomingGroup,
snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup, snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup,
snmpTlstmNotificationGroup } snmpTlstmNotificationGroup }
::= { snmpTlstmCompliances 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmCompliances 1 }
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
-- Units of conformance -- Units of conformance
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
skipping to change at page 28, line 22 skipping to change at line 1346
MODULE MODULE
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTlstmStatsGroup, MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTlstmStatsGroup,
snmpTlstmIncomingGroup, snmpTlstmIncomingGroup,
snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup, snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup,
snmpTlstmNotificationGroup } snmpTlstmNotificationGroup }
::= { snmpTlstmCompliances 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmCompliances 1 }
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
-- Units of conformance -- Units of conformance
-- ************************************************ -- ************************************************
snmpTlstmStatsGroup OBJECT-GROUP snmpTlstmStatsGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS { OBJECTS {
snmpTlstmSessionOpens, snmpTlstmSessionOpens,
snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses, snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses,
snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors, snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors,
snmpTlstmSessionAccepts, snmpTlstmSessionAccepts,
snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses, snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses,
snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions, snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions,
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates, snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates,
snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate, snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate,
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates, snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates,
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches
} }
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A collection of objects for maintaining "A collection of objects for maintaining statistical
statistical information of an SNMP engine that information of an SNMP engine that implements the SNMP
implements the SNMP TLS Transport Model." TLSTM."
::= { snmpTlstmGroups 1 } ::= { snmpTlstmGroups 1 }
snmpTlstmIncomingGroup OBJECT-GROUP snmpTlstmIncomingGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS { OBJECTS {
snmpTlstmCertToTSNCount, snmpTlstmCertToTSNCount,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTableLastChanged, snmpTlstmCertToTSNTableLastChanged,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint, snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType, snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNData, snmpTlstmCertToTSNData,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType, snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus
} }
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A collection of objects for maintaining "A collection of objects for maintaining incoming
incoming connection certificate mappings to connection certificate mappings to tmSecurityNames of an
tmSecurityNames of an SNMP engine that implements the SNMP engine that implements the SNMP TLSTM."
SNMP TLS Transport Model."
::= { snmpTlstmGroups 2 } ::= { snmpTlstmGroups 2 }
snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup OBJECT-GROUP snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS { OBJECTS {
snmpTlstmParamsCount, snmpTlstmParamsCount,
snmpTlstmParamsTableLastChanged, snmpTlstmParamsTableLastChanged,
snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint, snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint,
snmpTlstmParamsStorageType, snmpTlstmParamsStorageType,
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus, snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus,
snmpTlstmAddrCount, snmpTlstmAddrCount,
snmpTlstmAddrTableLastChanged, snmpTlstmAddrTableLastChanged,
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint, snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint,
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity, snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity,
snmpTlstmAddrStorageType, snmpTlstmAddrStorageType,
snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus
} }
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"A collection of objects for maintaining "A collection of objects for maintaining outgoing
outgoing connection certificates to use when opening connection certificates to use when opening connections as
connections as a result of SNMP-TARGET-MIB settings." a result of SNMP-TARGET-MIB settings."
::= { snmpTlstmGroups 3 } ::= { snmpTlstmGroups 3 }
snmpTlstmNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP snmpTlstmNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
NOTIFICATIONS { NOTIFICATIONS {
snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown, snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown,
snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate
} }
STATUS current STATUS current
DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION
"Notifications" "Notifications."
::= { snmpTlstmGroups 4 } ::= { snmpTlstmGroups 4 }
END END
<CODE ENDS>
5. Security Considerations 5. Security Considerations
This document updates a transport model that permits SNMP to utilize This document updates a transport model that permits SNMP to utilize
(D)TLS security services. The security threats and how the TLS (D)TLS security services. The security threats and how the TLSTM
transport model mitigates these threats are covered throughout this mitigates these threats are covered throughout this document and in
document and in [RFC6353]. Security considerations for TLS are [RFC6353]. Security considerations for TLS are described in
described in Section 10 and Appendix E of TLS 1.3 [RFC8446]. Section 10 and Appendix E of TLS 1.3 [RFC8446]. Security
Security considerations for DTLS are described in Section 11 of DTLS considerations for DTLS are described in Section 11 of DTLS 1.3
1.3 [RFC9147]. [RFC9147].
Implementations should consider the latest recommendations on the use Implementations should consider the latest recommendations on the use
of (DTLS), such as that documented in [RFC9325]. of (DTLS), such as those documented in [RFC9325].
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security.
Even if the network itself is secure (for example, by using IPsec), Even if the network itself is secure (for example, by using IPsec),
there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to
access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this
MIB module. MIB module.
It is RECOMMENDED that only SNMPv3 messages using the Transport It is RECOMMENDED that only SNMPv3 messages using the Transport
Security Model (TSM) or another secure-transport aware security model Security Model (TSM) or another secure-transport-aware security model
be sent over the TLSTM transport. be sent over the TLSTM transport.
6. IANA Considerations 6. IANA Considerations
IANA is asked to create a new registry called the SNMP-TLSTM IANA has created a new registry called "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms"
HashAlgorithm Registry in the Structure of Management Information within the "Structure of Management Information (SMI) Numbers (MIB
(SMI) Numbers (MIB Module Registrations) Group and to update the Module Registrations)" group. The description of this registry is
proposed URL reference in the above MIB (listed as "iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.snmpTlstmMIB.snmpTlstmHashAlgorithms
"https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml" (1.3.6.1.2.1.198.4)".
under SnmpTLSFingerprint), if needed, to accurately reflect its
location. The description of this registry should be:
iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.snmpTlstmMIB.snmpTlstmHashAlgorithms
(1.3.6.1.2.1.198.4). IANA is also asked to either 1) create the
snmp-tlstm-reg-review@ietf.org email address that appears later
within this section or 2) update the email address to an appropriate
address.
The registry should have the following fields: value, description, The registry has the following fields: Value, Description,
recommended, and reference. The range of values is zero to 255, with Recommended, and References. The range of values is zero to 255,
initial assignments shown in Section 2.1. The "recommended" column with initial assignments shown in Section 2.1. The "Recommended"
indicates "Y" for hashing algorithms that are standards track and are column indicates "Y" for hashing algorithms that are Standards Track
deemed to be acceptable for widely applicable current use and "N" for and are deemed to be acceptable for widely applicable current use and
hashing algorithms that reflect meanings that are not recommended "N" for hashing algorithms that reflect meanings that are not
(e.g., they do not provide sufficient security for modern systems, recommended (e.g., they do not provide sufficient security for modern
they are not standards track, they have limited applicability). A systems, they are not Standards Track, and they have limited
blank field indicates that no recommendation is made (e.g., because applicability). A blank field indicates that no recommendation is
the value is reserved or left for private use). made (e.g., because the value is unassigned or left for private use).
This registry is expected to be updated infrequently and, as such, This registry is expected to be updated infrequently; as such, its
its values are limited to one octet. values are limited to one octet.
The policy for updates to the SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithm Registry is The policy for updates to the "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms" registry is
Expert Review. Registry requests should be sent to the <snmp-tlstm- Expert Review [RFC8126]. Registry requests should be sent to the
reg-review@ietf.org> mailing list. Registration requests sent to the <mailto:snmp-tlstm-reg-review@ietf.org> mailing list. Registration
mailing list for review SHOULD use an appropriate subject (e.g., requests sent to the mailing list for review SHOULD use an
"Request to register value in SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithm Registry"). appropriate subject (e.g., 'Request to register value in "SNMP-TLSTM
In addition, designated experts should consult with the tls-reg- HashAlgorithms" registry'). In addition, designated experts should
review@ietf.org mailing list to make sure any new hash algorithms are consult with the <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org> mailing list to
considered for inclusion in this registry. make sure that any new hash algorithms are considered for inclusion
in this registry.
Designated experts SHOULD ascertain the existence of suitable Designated experts SHOULD ascertain the existence of suitable
documentation that defines a hash algorithm and SHOULD also verify documentation that defines a hash algorithm and SHOULD also verify
that the request does not conflict or duplicate other entries in the that the request does not conflict with or duplicate other entries in
registry. The experts should also provide a recommendation as to how the registry. The experts should also provide a recommendation as to
the recommended column of the registry should be updated. Only how the "Recommended" column of the registry should be updated. Only
publicly available specifications that represent current industry- publicly available specifications that represent current industry-
accepted practices should receive an assignment of "Y" in the accepted practices should receive an assignment of "Y" in the
recommneded column; all other specific assignments in the registry "Recommended" column; all other specific assignments in the registry
should receive an of "N". Assignments that are inspecific (e.g., should receive an assignment of "N". Assignments that are
reserved values) SHOULD not receive an assigned value for the nonspecific (e.g., reserved values) SHOULD NOT receive an assigned
recommended column. value for the "Recommended" column.
Within the three-week review period, the designated experts will Within the three-week review period, the designated experts will
either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this
decision to the review list and IANA. Denials SHOULD include an decision to the review list and IANA. Denials SHOULD include an
explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the
request successful. Registration requests that are undetermined for request successful. Registration requests that are undetermined for
a period longer than 21 days can be brought to the IESG's attention a period longer than three weeks can be brought to the IESG's
(using the <iesg@ietf.org> mailing list) for resolution. attention (using the <mailto:iesg@ietf.org> mailing list) for
resolution.
IANA MUST only accept registry updates from the designated experts IANA MUST only accept registry updates from the designated experts
and SHOULD direct all requests for registration to the review mailing and SHOULD direct all requests for registration to the review mailing
list. While future additions to the IANA TLS HashAlgorithm Registry list. While future additions to the "TLS HashAlgorithm" registry
(i.e., the registry from which the SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithm Registry (i.e., the registry from which the "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms"
was spawned) are not expected, any future addition to the IANA TLS registry was spawned) are not expected, any future additions to the
HashAlgorithm Registry MUST be consistent with the values assigned in "TLS HashAlgorithm" registry MUST be consistent with the values
the IANA SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithm Registry. assigned in the "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms" registry.
It is suggested that multiple designated experts be appointed who are It is suggested that multiple designated experts be appointed who are
able to represent the perspectives of different applications using able to represent the perspectives of different applications using
this specification, in order to enable broadly informed review of this specification, in order to enable broadly informed reviews of
registration decisions. In cases where a registration decision could registration decisions. In cases where a registration decision could
be perceived as creating a conflict of interest for a particular be perceived as creating a conflict of interest for a particular
Expert, that Expert SHOULD defer to the judgment of the other expert, that expert SHOULD defer to the judgment of the other
Experts. experts.
7. Acknowledgements
This document is based on [RFC6353]. This document was reviewed by
the following people who helped provide useful comments: Michaela
Vanderveen, Joe Clarke, Jurgen Schonwalder, and Tom Petch.
8. References 7. References
8.1. Normative References 7.1. Normative References
[RFC1123] Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - [RFC1123] Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123, Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123,
DOI 10.17487/RFC1123, October 1989, DOI 10.17487/RFC1123, October 1989,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1123>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1123>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3410, December 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3410>.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S., [RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008, (CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.
[RFC5890] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for [RFC5890] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for
Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework", Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework",
RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, August 2010, RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>.
skipping to change at page 33, line 17 skipping to change at line 1571
Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999. Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999. STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Conformance Statements for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999. STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/std58>
[STD62] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An [STD62] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An
Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62, RFC 3411, Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62, RFC 3411,
December 2002. December 2002.
Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen,
"Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network "Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3412, December Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3412, December
2002. 2002.
skipping to change at page 33, line 52 skipping to change at line 1608
STD 62, RFC 3416, December 2002. STD 62, RFC 3416, December 2002.
Presuhn, R., Ed., "Transport Mappings for the Simple Presuhn, R., Ed., "Transport Mappings for the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3417, Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3417,
December 2002. December 2002.
Presuhn, R., Ed., "Management Information Base (MIB) for Presuhn, R., Ed., "Management Information Base (MIB) for
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62,
RFC 3418, December 2002. RFC 3418, December 2002.
8.2. Informative References <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/std62>
7.2. Informative References
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security [RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008, DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.
[RFC5591] Harrington, D. and W. Hardaker, "Transport Security Model
for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
STD 78, RFC 5591, DOI 10.17487/RFC5591, June 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5591>.
[RFC5953] Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport [RFC5953] Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport
Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
RFC 5953, DOI 10.17487/RFC5953, August 2010, RFC 5953, DOI 10.17487/RFC5953, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5953>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5953>.
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
[RFC8422] Nir, Y., Josefsson, S., and M. Pegourie-Gonnard, "Elliptic [RFC8422] Nir, Y., Josefsson, S., and M. Pegourie-Gonnard, "Elliptic
Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer
Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier", RFC 8422, Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier", RFC 8422,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8422, August 2018, DOI 10.17487/RFC8422, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8422>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8422>.
[RFC8447] Salowey, J. and S. Turner, "IANA Registry Updates for TLS [RFC8447] Salowey, J. and S. Turner, "IANA Registry Updates for TLS
and DTLS", RFC 8447, DOI 10.17487/RFC8447, August 2018, and DTLS", RFC 8447, DOI 10.17487/RFC8447, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8447>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8447>.
skipping to change at page 34, line 45 skipping to change at line 1662
Integrity-Only Cipher Suites", RFC 9150, Integrity-Only Cipher Suites", RFC 9150,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9150, April 2022, DOI 10.17487/RFC9150, April 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9150>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9150>.
[RFC9325] Sheffer, Y., Saint-Andre, P., and T. Fossati, [RFC9325] Sheffer, Y., Saint-Andre, P., and T. Fossati,
"Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer "Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer
Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security
(DTLS)", BCP 195, RFC 9325, DOI 10.17487/RFC9325, November (DTLS)", BCP 195, RFC 9325, DOI 10.17487/RFC9325, November
2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9325>. 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9325>.
Acknowledgements
This document is based on [RFC6353]. This document was reviewed by
the following people, who helped provide useful comments: Michaela
Vanderveen, Joe Clarke, Jürgen Schönwälder, and Tom Petch.
Author's Address Author's Address
Kenneth Vaughn (editor) Kenneth Vaughn (editor)
Trevilon LLC Trevilon LLC
1060 Highway 107 South 1060 Highway 107 South
Del Rio, TN 37727 Del Rio, TN 37727
United States of America United States of America
Phone: +1 571 331 5670 Phone: +1 571 331 5670
Email: kvaughn@trevilon.com Email: kvaughn@trevilon.com
 End of changes. 190 change blocks. 
653 lines changed or deleted 720 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48.