ALTO Working Group Q. Wu Internet-Draft Huawei Intended status: Standards Track Y. Yang Expires: August 18, 2014 Yale University Y. Lee D. Dhody Huawei S. Randriamasy Alcatel-Lucent February 14, 2014 ALTO Traffic Engineering Cost Metrics draft-wu-alto-te-metrics-01 Abstract Cost Metric is a basic concept in Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO). It is used in both the Cost Map Service and the Endpoint Cost Service. Future extensions to ALTO may also use Cost Metric. Different applications may benefit from different Cost Metrics. For example, a Resource Consumer may prefer Resource Providers that have low delay to the Resource Consumer. However the base ALTO protocol [ALTO] has defined only a single cost metric, i.e., the generic "routingcost" metric (Sec. 14.2 of ALTO base specification [ALTO]). In this document, we define eleven Cost Metrics, derived from OSPF-TE and ISIS-TE, to measure network delay, jitter, packet loss, hop count, and bandwidth. The metrics defined in this document provide a relatively comprehensive set of Cost Metrics for ALTO focusing on traffic engineering (TE). Additional Cost Metrics such as financial cost metrics may be defined in other documents. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 1] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on August 18, 2014. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 2] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Conventions used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Metric: Delay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Metric: Delayjitter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 5. Metric: Pktloss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6. Metric: Hopcount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7. Metric: Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8. Metric: Maximum Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9. Metric: Maximum Reserved Bandwdith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 10. Metric: Unavailable Reserved Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 11. Metric: Residue Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 12. Metric: Available Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 13. Metric: Utilized Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 14. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 15. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 16. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 16.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 16.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 3] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 1. Introduction Cost Metric is a basic concept in Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO). It is used in both the Cost Map Service and the Endpoint Cost Service. In particular, applications may benefit from knowing network performance measured on several Cost Metrics. For example, a more delay sensitive application may focus on latency, and a more bandwidth-sensitive application may focus on available bandwidth. In this document, we define eleven Cost Metrics, extending the base ALTO protocol [ALTO], which has defined only a single Cost Metric, i.e., the generic "routingcost" metric (Sec. 14.2 of ALTO base specification [ALTO]). The Cost Metrics that we define in this document focus on traffic engineering. Additional metrics may be defined in other documents. In particular, the Cost Metrics that we define in this document can be gathered from routing systems; [RFC3630], [RFC3784], [OSPF-TE], [ISIS-TE], [BGP-LS] and [BGP-PM] define mechanisms that allow an ALTO Server to retrieve and derive the necessary information to provide the metrics that we define in this document. Note that the metrics that the ALTO Server retrieves may be defined for only links, and hence, the server will need to compose the link metrics to obtain path metrics used in services such as the Cost Map Service. In this definition, we define the metrics to be independent of link or path, considering that future ALTO extensions may define link-based services, and hence the defined metrics should still be usable. One challenge in defining the metrics is that performance metrics often depend on configuration parameters. For example, the value of packet loss rate depends on the measurement interval and varies over time. To handle this issue, ALTO server may collect data on time periods covering the past, present or only collect data on present time. The definitions of a set of Cost Metrics can allow us to extend the base protocol (e.g., allowing output and constraints use different Cost Metrics), but such extensions are not in the scope of this document. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 4] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 2. Conventions used in this document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [RFC2119]. Syntax specifications shown here use the augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) as described in [RFC5234], and are specified as in the base JSON specification [RFC4627]. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 5] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 3. Metric: Delay Cost Metric name: Delay Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal aggregated delay between the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. The delay is the time that the packet spends to travel from source to destination. Metric Unit: The unit is microsecond. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONNumber' type value containing a non-negative integer component that may be followed by an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The delay metric is part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect delay metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client,etc. When the delay metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE],the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 6] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, Either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for the delay metrics over a period of time are recorded, e.g., measured every hours and aggregated, or only the latest update is recorded. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value.It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 7] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 1: Delay value on source-destination endpoint pairs POST /endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type": {"cost-mode" : "numerical", "cost-metric" : "delay"}, "endpoints" : { "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ], "dsts": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta" :{ "cost-type": {"cost-mode" : "numerical", "cost-metric" : "delay" } }, "endpoint-cost-map" : { "ipv4:192.0.2.2": { "ipv4:192.0.2.89" : 10, "ipv4:198.51.100.34" : 20, "ipv4:203.0.113.45" : 30, } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 8] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 4. Metric: Delayjitter Cost Metric name: Delayjitter Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal aggregated jitter (latency variation) over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. Metric Unit: The unit is microsecond. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONumber' type value containing an integer component that may be followed by exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The delayjitter metric is part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect delayjitter metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client, etc. When the delayjitter metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE], the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 9] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for the delayjitter metrics over a period of time can be recorded, e.g., measured every hours,or only measure the latest update. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value.It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 10] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 2: Delayjitter value on source-destination endpoint pairs POST /endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type": {"cost-mode" : "numerical", "cost-metric" : "delayjitter"}, "endpoints" : { "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ], "dsts": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta": { "cost type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric":"delayjitter" } }, "endpoint-cost-map": { "ipv4:192.0.2.2": { "ipv4:192.0.2.89" : 0 "ipv4:198.51.100.34" : 1 "ipv4:203.0.113.45" : 5 } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 11] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 5. Metric: Pktloss Cost Metric name: pktloss Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal aggregated packet loss over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. Metric Unit: The unit is percentile. Metric Value Type: A single number value containing an integer component that may be followed by a fraction part and/or an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The pktloss metric is part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect pktloss metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client,etc. When the pktloss metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE], the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 12] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for this metric over a period of time can be recorded, e.g.,measured every hours,or only measure the latest update. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value. It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 13] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 3: pktloss value on source-destination endpoint pairs POST /endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type": {"cost-mode" : "numerical", "cost-metric" : "pktloss"}, "endpoints" : { "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ], "dsts": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta": { "cost type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric":"pktloss"} } }, "endpoint-cost-map": { "ipv4:192.0.2.2": { "ipv4:192.0.2.89" : 0, "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 1, "ipv4:203.0.113.45" : 2, } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 14] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 6. Metric: Hopcount The metric hopcount is mentioned in [ALTO] as an example. This section further clarifies its properties. Cost Metric name: Hopcount Metric Description: To specify the number of hops in the path between the source endpoint and the destination endpoint. Editor Note: Need to specify which level (AS, IP perhaps), details TBD for multiple-layer aspect. Metric Unit: The unit is integer number. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONNumber' type value containing an integer component. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value. It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 15] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 7. Metric: Bandwidth Cost Metric name: Bandwidth Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal aggregated bandwidth over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. Metric Unit: The units are bytes per second. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONNumber' type value containing an integer component that may be prefixed with an optional minus sign, which may be followed by a fraction part and/or an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is just a definition of a class of cost metric 'bandwidth'. The use of this cost metric is always in conjunction with what it represents, which could be Max Bandwidth (maxbw), Residual Bandwidth (residuebw) etc. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 16] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 This is intended to be a constraint attribute value It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 17] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 8. Metric: Maximum Bandwidth Cost Metric name: Maximum Bandwidth Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal maximum bandwidth over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the context interval. Metric Unit: The units are bytes per second. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONNumber' type value containing an integer component that may be followed by an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The Maximum Bandwidth metric is gathered using [RFC3630], [RFC3784] or [BGP-LS]. It is extended from Bandwidth cost metric and is part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect Maximum Bandwidth metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client,etc. When the Maximum Bandwidth metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE], the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 18] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for this metric over a period of time can be recorded, e.g.,measured every hours,or only measure the latest update. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value. It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 19] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 4: maxbw value on source-destination endpoint pairs POST/ endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "maxbw"}, "endpoints": { "srcs": [ "ipv4 : 192.0.2.2" ], "dsts": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta": { "cost-type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "maxbw" } }, "endpoint-cost-map": { "ipv4:192.0.2.2": { "ipv4:192.0.2.89": 0, "ipv4:198.51.100.34" : 2000, "ipv4:203.0.113.45": 5000, } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 20] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 9. Metric: Maximum Reserved Bandwdith Cost Metric name: Maximum Reserved Bandwidth Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal maximum reserved bandwidth over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. Metric Unit: The units are bytes per second. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONNumber' type value containing an integer component that may be followed by an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The Maximum Reserved Bandwdith is gathered using [RFC3630], [RFC3784] or [BGP-LS]. It is extended from Bandwidth Cost metric defined as part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect Maximum Reserved Bandwdith metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client,etc. When the Maximum Reserved Bandwdith metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE], the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 21] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for this metric over a period of time can be recorded, e.g.,measured every hours,or only measure the latest update. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute value. It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 22] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 5: maxresbw value on source-destination endpoint pairs POST/ endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type" { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "maxresbw"}, "endpoints": { "srcs": [ "ipv4 : 192.0.2.2" ], "dsts": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta": { "cost-type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "maxresbw" } }, " endpoint-cost-map": { "ipv4:192.0.2.2" { "ipv4:192.0.2.89" : 0, "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 2000, "ipv4:203.0.113.45": 5000, } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 23] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 10. Metric: Unavailable Reserved Bandwidth Cost Metric name: Unavailable Reserved Bandwidth Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal unavailable reserved bandwidth over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. Metric Unit: The units are bytes per second. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONArray' type with each value containing an integer component that may be followed by an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The Unavailable Reserved Bandwidth metric is gathered using [RFC3630], [RFC3784] or [BGP-LS]. It is extended from Bandwidth Cost metric and defined as part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect Unavailable Reserved Bandwidth metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client,etc. When the Unavailable Reserved Bandwidth metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE],the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 24] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for this metric over a period of time can be recorded, e.g.,measured every hours,or only measure the latest update. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute values. The values correspond to the bandwidth that can be reserved with a setup priority of 0 through 7. It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used Either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 25] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 6: unresbw value on source-destination endpoint pairs In this example, the Collection method specifies that the 'unresbw' values are defined as the 'unavailable bandwidth' specified in section 2.5.8 of RFC3630: 8 unavailable bandwidth value are reported in the same OSPF message using the same TLV. Each value is corresponding to the bandwidth that can be reserved with a setup priority of 0 through 7. POST/ endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type" { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "unresbw[1,8]" }, "endpoints": { "srcs": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.2" ], "dsts": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta": { "cost-type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "unresbw[1,8]" } }, "endpoint-cost-map" { "ipv4:192.0.2.2" { "ipv4:192.0.2.89" : [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0], "ipv4:198.51.100.34": [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,2000], "ipv4:203.0.113.45": [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,5000], } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 26] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 11. Metric: Residue Bandwidth Cost Metric name: Residue Bandwidth Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal residual bandwidth over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. Metric Unit: The units are bytes per second. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONArray' type with each value containing an integer component that may be followed by an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The Residue Bandwidth metric is gathered using [OSPF-TE], [ISIS-TE] or [BGP-PM]. It is extended from Bandwidth Cost metric and is part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect Residue Bandwidth metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client,etc. When the Residue Bandwidth metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE],the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 27] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for this metric over a period of time can be recorded, e.g.,measured every hours,or only measure the latest update. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute values. The values correspond to the bandwidth that can be reserved with a setup priority of 0 through 7. It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used Either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 28] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 7: residuebw value on source-destination endpoint pairs POST/ endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "residubw"}, "endpoints": { "srcs": [ "ipv4 : 192.0.2.2" ], "dsts": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta": { "cost-type" { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "residubw" } }, "endpoint-cost-map" { "ipv4:192.0.2.2" { "ipv4:192.0.2.89" : 0, "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 2000, "ipv4:203.0.113.45": 5000, } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 29] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 12. Metric: Available Bandwidth Cost Metric name: Available Bandwidth Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal availaible bandwidth over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. Metric Unit: The units are bytes per second. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONArray' type with each value containing an integer component that may be followed by an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The Available Bandwidth metric is gathered using [OSPF-TE], [ISIS-TE] or [BGP- PM]. It is extended from Bandwidth Cost metric and is part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect Available Bandwidth metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client,etc. When the Available Bandwidth metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE],the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 30] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for this metric over a period of time can be recorded, e.g.,measured every hours,or only measure the latest update. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute values. The values correspond to the bandwidth that can be reserved with a setup priority of 0 through 7. It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used Either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 31] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 8: availbw value on source-destination endpoint pairs POST /endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "availbw"}, "endpoints": { "srcs": [ "ipv4 : 192.0.2.2" ], "dsts": [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta": { "cost-type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "availbw" } }, "endpoint-cost-map": { "ipv4:192.0.2.2" { "ipv4:192.0.2.89" : 0, "ipv4:198.51.100.34": 2000, "ipv4:203.0.113.45": 5000, } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 32] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 13. Metric: Utilized Bandwidth Cost Metric name: Utilized Bandwidth Metric Description: To specify spatial and temporal utilized bandwidth over the specified source and destination. The spatial aggregation unit is specified in the query context (e.g., PID to PID, or endhost to endhost); and the temporal unit is specified as the measurement interval in the query context. Metric Unit: The units are bytes per second. Metric Value Type: A single 'JSONArray' type with each value containing an integer component that may be followed by an exponent part. Cost Mode: A Cost Mode is encoded as a US-ASCII string. The string MUST either have the value 'numerical' or 'ordinal'. Collection Method: The Utilized Bandwidth metric is gathered using [OSPF-TE], [ISIS-TE] or [BGP-PM]. It is extended from bandwidth cost metric and is part of ALTO information provided by ALTO server. ALTO server may collect Utilized Bandwidth metric from routing protocol or deploy data source to collect data to compute the delay metrics [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT]. The data source can be either log server or OAM system or P2P client,etc. When The Utilized Bandwidth metric is collected from routing protocol, it is measured over a measurement interval preconfigured by routing protocol. As described in Section 5 of [ISIS-TE],the default measurement interval is set to 30 seconds. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 33] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 ALTO server may also have additional data processing such as aggregating the results across multiple systems, remove outliers, create additional statistics. When the data is collected from data source or collected from routing protocol, either scheduling can be used so that the past and present results for this metric over a period of time can be recorded, e.g.,measured every hours,or only measure the latest update. ALTO Sample interval: The ALTO Server may collect values from the sources measurements done e.g. every second over a period of 30 seconds. The ALTO Server may then aggregate these values over ALTO Sample intevals of at least 30 seconds and provide updates every hour. Use and Applications: This is intended to be a constraint attribute values. The values correspond to the bandwidth that can be reserved with a setup priority of 0 through 7. It could be used as a cost metric constraint attribute used Either together with cost metric attribute 'routingcost' or on its own or as a returned cost metric in the response. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 34] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Example 9: utilbw value on source-destination endpoint pairs POST /endpointcost/lookup HTTP/1.1 Host: alto.example.com Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcostparams+json Accept: application/alto-endpointcost+json,application/alto-error+json { "cost-type": {"cost-mode" : "numerical", "cost-metric" : "utilbw"}, "endpoints": { "srcs" : [ "ipv4 : 192.0.2.2" ], "dsts" : [ "ipv4:192.0.2.89", "ipv4:198.51.100.34", "ipv4:203.0.113.45" ] } } HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Length: TBA Content-Type: application/alto-endpointcost+json { "meta": { "cost type": { "cost-mode": "numerical", "cost-metric": "utilbw" } }, "endpoint-cost-map": { "ipv4:192.0.2.2" { "ipv4:192.0.2.89" : 0, "ipv4:198.51.100.34" : 2000, "ipv4:203.0.113.45" : 5000, } } } Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 35] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 14. Security Considerations The properties defined in this document present no security considerations beyond those in Section 15 of the base ALTO specification [ALTO]. However concerns addressed in Sections "15.1 Authenticity and Integrity of ALTO Information", "15.2 Potential Undesirable Guidance from Authenticated ALTO Information" and "15.3 Confidentiality of ALTO Information" remain of utmost importance. Indeed, TE performance is a highly sensitive ISP information and sharing TE metric values in numerical mode requires full mutual confidence between the entities managing the ALTO Server and Client. Numerical TE performance information will most likely be distributed by ALTO Servers to Clients under strict and formal mutual trust agreements. One the other hand, ALTO Clients must be cognizant on the risks attached to such information that they would have acquired outside formal conditions of mutual trust. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 36] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 15. IANA Considerations IANA has added the following entries to the ALTO cost map Properties registry, defined in Section 3 of [RFCXXX]. +-----------+--------------+------------------------+ | Namespace | Property | Reference | +-----------+--------------+------------------------+ | | delay | [RFCxxxx], Section 3 | | | jitter | [RFCxxxx], Section 4 | | | pktloss | [RFCxxxx], Section 5 | | | hopcount | [RFCxxxx], Section 6 | | | bandwidth | [RFCxxxx], Section 7 | | | maxbw |[RFCxxxx], Section 8 | | | maxresbw |[RFCxxxx], Section 9 | | | unresdbw |[RFCxxxx], Section 10 | | | residbw |[RFCxxxx], Section 11 | | | availbw |[RFCxxxx], Section 12 | | | utilbw |[RFCxxxx], Section 13 | +-----------+--------------+------------------------+ Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 37] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 16. References 16.1. Normative References [ALTO] Alimi, R., "ALTO Protocol", ID draft-ietf-alto-protocol-16, May 2013. [BGP-LS] Gredler, H., "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using BGP", ID draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-03, May 2013. [BGP-PM] Wu, Q., "BGP attribute for North-Bound Distribution of Traffic Engineering (TE) performance Metrics", ID draft-wu-idr-te-pm-bgp-02, October 2013. [ISIS-TE] Giacalone, S., "ISIS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions", ID draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-01, October 2013. [OSPF-TE] Giacalone, S., "OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions", ID draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-04, June 2013. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", March 1997. [RFC4627] Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006. [RFC5234] Crocker, D., "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 5234, January 2008. 16.2. Informative References [ALTO-DEPLOYMENT] Stiemerling, M., Kiesel, S., Previdi, S., and M. Scharf, "ALTO Deployment Considerations", ID draft-ietf-alto-deployments-08, October 2013. [RFC6390] Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Framework for Performance Metric Development", RFC 6390, July 2011. Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 38] Internet-Draft ALTO TE Metrics February 2014 Authors' Addresses Qin Wu Huawei 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012 China Email: sunseawq@huawei.com Y. Richard Yang Yale University 51 Prospect St New Haven, CT 06520 USA Email: yry@cs.yale.edu Young Lee Huawei 1700 Alma Drive, Suite 500 Plano, TX 75075 USA Email: leeyoung@huawei.com Dhruv Dhody Huawei Leela Palace Bangalore, Karnataka 560008 INDIA Email: dhruv.ietf@gmail.com Sabine Randriamasy Alcatel-Lucent Route de Villejust Nozay, 91460 FRANCE Email: Sabine.Randriamasy@alcatel-lucent.com Wu, et al. Expires August 18, 2014 [Page 39]